bypass top and left hand navigationNational Science Board   HOME     PDF     SEARCH     HELP     COMMENTS     TEXT ONLY  
Science and Engineering Indicators 2004
  Table of Contents     Figures     Tables     Appendix Tables     Presentation Slides  
Chapter 8:
Overview
Secondary Education
Higher Education
Workforce
Financial Research and Development Inputs
R&D; Outputs
Science and Technology in the Economy

 

 

Data Tools
Feedback
Tell us what you think about the new state indicators chapter

State Indicators

PDFPrint this chapter (2.34MB)
Financial Research and Development Inputs

Select Indicator:

Quartiles | Findings | Description

Federal R&D obligations per individual in S&E occupation: 1999 Puerto Rico: $NA District of Columbia: $45,484 Maryland: $77,756 Delaware: $3,206 New Hampshire: $15,273 Massachusetts: $21,031 New Jersey: $21,957 Alaska: $14,937 Alabama: $41,731 Arizona: $20,053 Arkansas: $6,297 California: $31,708 Colorado: $14,847 Connecticut: $11,395 Florida: $18,572 Georgia: $23,553 Idaho: $12,947 Illinois: $8,480 Indiana: $7,390 Iowa: $11,049 Kansas: $6,102 Kentucky: $5,626 Louisiana: $6,175 Maine: $13,444 Michigan: $6,371 Minnesota: $10,847 Mississippi: $21,837 Missouri: $15,224 Montana: $11,098 Nebraska: $4,728 Nevada: $25,845 New Mexico: $72,318 New York: $12,449 North Carolina: $10,741 North Dakota: $12,755 Ohio: $27,749 Oklahoma: $5,901 Oregon: $9,403 Pennsylvania: $13,309 Rhode Island: $27,586 South Carolina: $5,758 South Dakota: $5,564 Tennessee: $15,421 Hawaii: $16,992 Texas: $15,123 Utah: $12,104 Vermont: $4,937 Virginia: $46,337 Washington: $12,874 West Virginia: $13,759 Wisconsin: $7,102 Wyoming: $7,337

Quartiles top

Quartile groups for federal R&D obligations per individual in S&E occupation: 1999*
1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile
($77,756 - $21,031) ($20,053 - $12,947) ($12,874 - $7,337) ($7,102 - $3,206)
Alabama Alaska Connecticut Arkansas
California Arizona Illinois Delaware
District of Columbia Colorado Indiana Kansas
Georgia Florida Iowa Kentucky
Maryland Hawaii Minnesota Louisiana
Massachusetts Idaho Montana Michigan
Mississippi Maine New York Nebraska
Nevada Missouri North Carolina Oklahoma
New Jersey New Hampshire North Dakota South Carolina
New Mexico Pennsylvania Oregon South Dakota
Ohio Tennessee Utah Vermont
Rhode Island Texas Washington Wisconsin
Virginia West Virginia Wyoming  
*States in alphabetical order, not data order.

SOURCES: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS), Federal Funds for Research and Development; and NSF/SRS, Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System (SESTAT). See table 8-14.

Findings top

  • The Federal Government obligated about $66.5 billion to the states in 1995, $68.4 billion in 1997, and $73.6 billion in 1999 for R&D.

  •  The number of people in S&E occupations grew at about the same rate as the Federal R&D obligations, yielding a fairly stable amount per person during this period, about $20,900 in 1999.

  •  Changes in state-by-state distribution of Federal R&D obligations resulted in significant changes in per-person funds for several states.

  •  A high score was evident for states in the national capital area. The state distribution on this indicator is highly skewed, with only 13 states above the national average.

Description top

This indicator demonstrates how Federal research and development obligations are distributed geographically based on individuals with a bachelor's or higher degree who work in science and engineering occupations. These positions include mathematical, computer, life, physical, and social scientists; engineers; and post-secondary teachers in any of these S&E fields. Positions such as managers and elementary and secondary school teachers are excluded.

Federal R&D dollars are counted where they are obligated but may be expended in many locations. Data on people in S&E occupations are sample based. For these reasons, estimates for sparsely populated states and the District of Columbia may be imprecise. A high value for this indicator may indicate the existence of major federally funded R&D facilities or the presence of large defense contractors in the state.

 


  Top Of Page