Systematic Evidence Review Number 24

Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection

File Inventory


Prepared by:

Oregon Health & Science University
Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center
Portland, OR 97239

Roger Chou, M.D.
Elizabeth Clark, M.D., M.P.H.
Mark Helfand, M.D., M.S.


File Name	Description				Software	Version	File	Size
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
01rept.doc	Microsoft Word® Document		MS Word®	2002	788KB	83 pages
Contents: Cover, Title Page, Preface, Abstract, Table of Contents; 
Chapter 1. Introduction: Published Guidelines, Burden of Suffering, Definitions, Natural History, 
 Analytic Framework and Key Questions; 
Chapter 2. Methods: Search Strategy, Inclusion Criteria, Data Extraction; 
Chapter 3. Results: Arrow 1: Does screening for hepatitis C reduce the risk or rate of harm and
   premature death and disability?,
  Arrow 2: Can clinical or demographic characteristics identify a subgroup of asymptomatic patients 
   at higher risk for HCV infection?,
  Arrow 3: What are the test characteristics of HCV antibody testing?,
  Arrow 4: What is the false-positive rate and what are the harms associated with screening for 
   hepatitis C virus?,
  Arrow 5a: What are the test characteristics off the work-up for treatable disease?,
  Arrow 5b: In patients found to be positive for hepatitis C antibody, what proportion of patients 
   would qualify for antiviral treatment?,
  Arrow 6: What are the harms associated with the work-up for active HCV disease?,
  Arrow 7a: How well does antiviral treatment reduce the rate of viremia, improve transaminase levels, 
   and improve histology?,
  Arrow 7b: How well does antiviral treatment improve health outcomes in asymptomatic patients 
   with hepatitis C?,
  Arrow 7c: How well do counseling and immunizations in asymptomatic patients with hepatitis C 
   improve clinical outcomes or prevent spread of disease?,
  Arrow 8: What are the harms (including intolerance to treatment) associated with antiviral treatment?,
  Arrow 9: Have improvements in intermediate outcomes (liver function tests, viral remission, 
   histologic changes) been shown to reduce the risk or rate of harm from hepatitis C?;
Conclusions; 
Future Research Priorities;
References
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
02tbl1.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	12KB	1 page
Contents: Table 1. Current HCV Screening Recommendations
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
03tbl2.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	9KB	1 page
Contents: Table 2. HCV Screening Test Results and Usual Interpretation
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
04tbl3.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	10KB	1 page
Contents: Table 3. Long-term Outcomes of Chronic HCV Infection in Community-based Cohorts 
Including Asymptomatic Patients
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
05tbl4.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	14KB	3 pages
Contents: Table 4. Independent Risk Factors for HCV Infection from Large Observational Studies
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
06tbl5.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	9KB	1 page
Contents: Table 5. Comparative Treatment Response Rates for HCV Infection
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
07tbl6.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	18KB	1 page
Contents: Table 6. Differences Between Responders and Non-responders in Baseline and 24 Week 
SF-36 Scores
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
08tbl7.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	23KB	4 pages
Contents: Table 7. Summary of Findings of Systematic Review
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
09tbl8.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	12KB	2 pages
Contents: Table 8. Estimated Yield of Screening for Hepatitis C Virus
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
10etbl1a.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	76KB	12 pages
Contents: Evidence Table 1a. Intermediate Outcomes
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
11etbl1b.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	30KB	2 pages
Contents: Evidence Table 1b. Quality of RCTs for Treatment-Intermediate Outcomes
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
12etbl2.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	36KB	4 pages
Contents: Evidence Table 2. Interferon Plus Ribavirin Intermediate Outcomes
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
13etbl3a.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	39KB	3 pages
Contents: Evidence Table 3a. Long-term Outcomes
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
14etbl3b.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet	M	S Excel®	2002	24KB	2 pages
Contents: Evidence Table 3b. Quality of RCTs for Long-Term Outcomes
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
15etbl4.xls	Microsoft Excel® Worksheet		MS Excel®	2002	20KB	2 pages
Contents: Evidence Table 4. Quality of Life
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
16fig1.ppt	Microsoft PowerPoint® Presentation	MS PowerPoint®	2002	54KB	1 page
Contents: Figure 1. Screening for Hepatitis C: Analytic Framework and Key Questions
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Current as of March 2004


Internet Citation:

Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection. File Inventory, Systematic Evidence Review Number 24. March 2004. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/prev/hepcinv.htm.


Return to Preventive Services Files Download
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Clinical Information
AHRQ Home Page
Department of Health and Human Services