NCEH in Partnership
With California
NCEH is the National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), a
part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
NCEH’s work focuses on three program areas: identifying
environmental hazards, measuring exposure to environmental
chemicals, and preventing health effects from environmental
hazards. NCEH has more than 450 employees and an annual budget for
2003 of approximately $182 million; its mission is to promote
health and quality of life by preventing or controlling those
diseases or deaths that result from interactions between people
and their environment.
NCEH and partners throughout California have teamed up on a
variety of environmental health projects throughout the state.
From fiscal years 2001 through 2003, NCEH awarded more than
$8.8 million in direct funds and services to California for
various projects. These projects include activities related to
asthma, biomonitoring planning, and childhood lead-poisoning
prevention. In addition, California also benefits from
national-level prevention and response activities conducted by
NCEH or NCEH-funded partners.
Identifying
Environmental Hazards
NCEH identifies, investigates, and tracks environmental hazards
and their effects on people’s health. Following are examples of
such activities that NCEH has conducted or supported in
California.
- Addressing Asthma From a Public Health Perspective—In September
2002, NCEH began funding California’s Addressing Asthma
From a Public Health Perspective program. This program pursues a
regional approach to implementing major components of California’s
Strategic Plan for Asthma. The program, now named California
Breathing, recognizes the need to build on existing regional
infrastructure to describe asthma in California, build a statewide
partnership for advancing public policy, and address disparities
in asthma hospitalizations and deaths among African Americans.
-
Pesticide Exposure Assessment—In 2001, NCEH began working
with the California Department of Health Services to learn
more about the pesticide levels in women in U.S. farming
communities. CDC recently improved the methods used to measure
pesticides, and the samples collected in Imperial County
were some of the first samples in the United States to be tested
with these new methods. These samples will help us begin to
understand whether women who live in Imperial County are different
in their pesticide exposures than are women in the general U.S.
population.
-
Environmental Public Health Tracking—NCEH is currently
funding three activities in the state of California that
contribute to building the National Environmental Public Health
Tracking Program. Two linkage demonstration programs are funded
with the state department of health, and the University of
California at Berkeley is funded to serve as a Center for
Excellence for the National Environmental Public Health Tracking
Program.
Back to Top
Measuring Exposure
to Environmental Chemicals
NCEH measures environmental chemicals in people to determine how
to protect people and improve their health. Following are examples
of such activities that NCEH has conducted or supported in
California.
Funding
- Antiterrorism Funding to Increase State Chemical Laboratory
Capacity—In fiscal year 2003, CDC provided more than $1.5
million to California to assist the state in expanding its
chemical laboratory capacity to prepare and respond to chemical
terrorism incidents and other chemical emergencies. This program
expansion will allow for full participation of chemical-terrorism
response laboratories in the Laboratory Response Network. NCEH
also continues to fund laboratory development and the purchase of
state-of-the-art equipment in California’s state public health
laboratory in support of developing a network of chemical
laboratories and of transferring technology to measure chemical
agents.
-
Biomonitoring Planning Grant—In fiscal years 2001 and 2002,
NCEH awarded grants to California to develop a plan for
implementing a biomonitoring program for the state. In this way,
the state could make decisions about which environmental chemicals
within its borders were of health concern and could make plans for
measuring levels of those chemicals in the California population.
Studies
- Ascertaining Exposure of Pregnant Women to Environmental
Tobacco Smoke—This study of pregnant women living in San
Diego County was conducted in collaboration with the
California Department of Health Services during the period
1999–2001. Biological samples (blood, urine, and umbilical cord
blood) were collected from each participant at the time pregnancy
was confirmed, at 15–19 weeks’ gestation, and at delivery. All
samples will be analyzed for cotinine, a major metabolite of
nicotine and a marker of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
(also called ETS, passive smoke, or secondhand smoke).
The purpose of the study was to describe the pattern of exposure
to both active smoking and ETS during pregnancy in the study
population and to compare the validity (relative to biomarker
information) of two proposed smoking-behavior questions that could
be posed to pregnant women at the time of delivery. This is
important because California is the only state that does not have
questions on its birth registry about exposure to tobacco through
either active or passive smoking.
-
Cigarette Nicotine Delivery—Many smokers believe that
smoking light or ultralight cigarettes is safer than smoking
full-flavor cigarettes; however, considerable evidence exists that
people who smoke light cigarettes take in as much nicotine as do
people who smoke high-yield cigarettes. However, data on exposure
levels to various tobacco toxins are limited. This 3-week
crossover study was conducted in collaboration with the
University of California at San Francisco. Participants were
volunteers who were active smokers.
The study compared their smoking behavior and exposure to
tobacco-smoke toxins while volunteers smoked their usual brand of
cigarettes for 1 week, while they smoked cigarettes of a different
yield for 1 week, and while they smoked their usual brand again
for 1 week. Half of the study participants were those who normally
smoked full-flavor cigarettes; the other half were those who
typically smoked light cigarettes. In addition to ascertaining
cigarette-puffing behaviors, scientists measured levels of
nicotine, carbon monoxide, various tobacco carcinogens, and
markers of exposure to tar.
-
Reducing Exposure to ETS Among Underserved Children With Asthma—Exposure
to tobacco smoke contributes to and exacerbates the symptoms of
asthma among children. The purpose of this ongoing study is to
implement and evaluate interventions intended to motivate Los
Angeles-area parents and other caregivers of area children
with asthma to establish smoke-free households. The predominantly
Hispanic and African-American children, aged 2–14 years, are from
low-income households. NCEH laboratory scientists measured urinary
levels of cotinine in these children. In addition to evaluating
the effectiveness of targeted educational interventions designed
to reduce exposure to ETS, other goals were to improve the
children’s pulmonary function, lessen their asthma symptoms,
reduce asthma-related hospitalizations, and improve parents’
knowledge about the relation between exposure to ETS and childhood
asthma.
-
Assessing Exposure to ETS Among Infants—NCEH is conducting
two studies to assess exposure to ETS among infants by measuring
levels of cotinine in their urine. One study includes infants
whose mothers were enrolled in the Women, Infants, and Children
Supplemental Food Program in San Diego County. The other
study includes infants enrolled in a clinic-based program in the
same region. The purpose of both studies is to evaluate the
effectiveness of a behavioral counseling program designed to
reduce maternal and infant exposure to ETS in the home. Another
goal is to examine the effects of this intervention program on the
smoking behavior of mothers in the study. The laboratory data will
provide biological confirmation of the effectiveness of the
intervention and also provide information on levels of exposure to
cotinine in the infants, who are a highly vulnerable population.
-
Reducing Exposure to ETS Among Latino Children With Asthma—This
ongoing study was done to evaluate the effectiveness of an
intervention program to reduce exposure of children aged 3–17
years to ETS in their homes. Two hundred Latino families living in
the San Diego area are participating in the study. The
study looks at parental reports about exposure to ETS and outcomes
of the interventions and compares these factors with levels of
cotinine measured several times during the study. Another study
goal is to examine changes in how parents manage their children’s
asthma once an intervention program is instituted.
-
Organophosphate (OP) Pesticides—As part of a prospective
birth cohort study called CHAMACOS (for the Center for Health
Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas) conducted by
the University of California at Berkeley, NCEH measured
levels of pesticides in the urine of approximately 500 pregnant
women. To date, the researchers have evaluated the relation
between a mother’s exposure to these pesticides and certain birth
outcomes, such as gestational age, birth length and weight, and
head circumference. The data suggest that a woman’s exposure to
the pesticides during her pregnancy can significantly decrease her
child’s gestational age. Additionally, OP pesticides were measured
in the urine of children of study women when the children were 6
months and 12 months of age. The analyses suggested that two
factors can significantly increase the exposure of these children
to OP pesticides: living near an agricultural field and having
parents who are farmers or farm workers.
Services
- Helping State Public Health Laboratories Respond to Chemical
Terrorism—NCEH is working with California’s public
health laboratory to prepare state laboratory scientists to
measure chemical terrorism agents or their metabolites in people’s
blood or urine. To date, NCEH has conducted training for these
scientists on operating state-of-the-art laboratory instruments
and on using specific methods to analyze these agents.
Additionally, NCEH has transferred methods for measuring nerve
agents, cyanide, and trace metals to the state laboratory and has
instituted a proficiency testing program to test the comparability
of analytical results from the state lab and NCEH.
-
Blood Lead Laboratory Reference System (BLLRS)—In California, 15
laboratories participate in NCEH’s standardization program to
improve the overall quality of laboratory measurements of blood
lead levels. This program assists laboratories nationwide in
evaluating their performance on these critical laboratory tests.
CDC provides BLLRS materials to the laboratories four times a year
without charge.
-
Lipid Standardization Program (LSP)—CDC provides
standardization support to 16 lipid research laboratories in
California that are involved in one or more ongoing lipid
metabolism longitudinal studies or clinical trials investigating
risk factors and complications associated with cardiovascular
disease. LSP, supported by CDC’s Lipid Reference Laboratory (the
cornerstone of the National Reference System for Cholesterol to
which these lipid measurements are traceable), provides quarterly
analytical performance challenges and statistical assessment
reports to allow program participants to monitor performance over
time and thus ensure the accuracy and comparability of study
results and findings.
Back to Top
Preventing Health Effects From Environmental Hazards
NCEH promotes safe environmental public health practices to
minimize exposure to environmental hazards and prevent adverse
health effects. Following are examples of such activities that
NCEH has conducted or supported in California.
- Childhood Lead-Poisoning Prevention—The California
Department of Health Services Childhood Lead-Poisoning Prevention
Branch provides screening services, medical and environmental
follow-up, and educational outreach services to the community. The
branch has received NCEH funding since 1992.
In California, the number of children younger than 6 years
of age who have been screened for blood lead levels has increased
18% from 2000 to 2001—from 12,717 to 15,040, respectively. In
addition to more children being tested, the number of children
younger than 6 years of age with elevated blood lead levels has
decreased 5%—from 1,475 in 2000 to 1,402 in 2001. The most
important thing that California has done in the last year is to
require universal laboratory reporting of blood lead levels to the
state.
-
Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net)—EHS-Net
is a collaborative project of CDC, eight CDC Emerging Infections
Program sites (including California), and the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration. Members of EHS-Net are gathering information
from food-service establishments to learn more about food-handling
practices and how they relate to foodborne illness—both what
happens to cause foodborne outbreaks and why foodborne outbreaks
occur.
Back to Top
Resources
NCEH develops materials that public health professionals, medical
care providers, emergency responders, decision makers, and the
public can use to identify and track hazards in the environment
that pose a threat to human health and to prevent or mitigate
exposure to those hazards. NCEH’s resources cover a range of
environmental public health issues, including air pollution and
respiratory health (e.g., asthma, carbon monoxide, and mold
issues), biomonitoring to determine whether and how much of
substances in the environment are getting into people, childhood
lead poisoning, emergency preparedness and response for chemicals
and radiation, environmental health services, environmental public
health tracking, international emergency and refugee health,
laboratory sciences as applied to environmental health, radiation
studies, safe chemical weapons disposal, specific health studies,
vessel sanitation, and veterans’ health.
For more information about NCEH programs, activities, and
publications and other resources, contact the NCEH Health Line
toll-free at 1-888-232-6789, e-mail
NCEHinfo@cdc.gov, or visit
the NCEH Web site at
www.cdc.gov/nceh.
February 2004
Back to Top
|