National Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety

1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449  |  Phone: 888-924-SAFE (7233)  |  Fax: 715-389-4996 | Contact Us | National Farm Medicine Center

Home

Projects Resources Staff Site Map About Us

Rural Youth Pedestrian-Motor Vehicle Traffic

July 2001

Background

Injuries resulting from pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes on public roadways are termed pedestrian-motor vehicle traffic (PMVT) injuries. In 1999, youth under age 15 accounted for 30% of all PMVT fatalities nationwide.1 Per mile traveled, pedestrians experience a 36 times higher fatality rate than motor vehicle occupants.2

National and State Injury Experience
Rural-Specific

General

Youth PMVT Fatalities in Rural Areas*
1995-1999 national data reveal the following about youth PMVT fatalities on rural roadways:

Youth 61% male
74% 5-14 years
Driver estimated 11% struck by impaired driver
Lighting 60% occurred from 3-9 p.m.
Vehicle

49% cars
26% pickup trucks
3% school bus

Roadway 97% paved roads
75% local roads and secondary roads in between small towns
50% mid-block locations
42% roads with posted speeds > 50 MPH**

Selected factors believed to be more problematic in rural areas include:

* Unincorporated area or an incorporated area of less than 5,000 people.
** Though posted speed is a proxy for actual speed traveled, a pedestrian hit at 20 MPH has a 95% chance of survival compared to virtually no chance if hit at 50 MPH or greater. 11

General Risk Factors for Youth PMVTs:

Prevention Recommendations
Rural-Specific

General

Selected Resources*
Rural-Specific

General Pedestrian

* These resources are provided as general information. In some cases, studies examining their effectiveness in reducing youth injury have not been conducted.

Citations

  1. National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Traffic Safety Facts 1999: Children. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2000.
  2. McCann B, Delille B. Mean Streets 2000: Pedestrian Safety, Health, and Federal Transportation Spending. Washington DC: Surface Transportation Policy Project; 2000. Downloaded January 5, 2001 at http://www.transact.org/Reports/ms2000/ms2000.pdf.
  3. Unpublished FARS data. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1995-1999.
  4. Unpublished WISQARS data: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 1996-1998.
  5. Roberts I, Norton R, Taua B. Child pedestrian injury rates: the importance of exposure to risk relating to socioeconomic and ethnic differences, in Auckland, New Zealand. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50:162-5.
  6. Mueller BA, Rivara FP, Bergman AB. Urban-rural location and the risk of dying in a pedestrian-vehicle collision. J Trauma. 1988;28:91-4.
  7. Calhoun AD, McGwin G, Jr., King WD, Rousculp MD. Pediatric pedestrian injuries: A community assessment using a hospital surveillance system. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:685-90.
  8. Highway Loss Data Institute. Q & A: Pedestrians. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 2000. Downloaded August 17, 2000 at: www.highwaysafety.org/safety_facts/qanda.peds.htm.
  9. SafeUSA. Walking Safety Factsheet. Silver Springs, MD; 2000 Downloaded September 21, 2000 at: www.cdc.gov/safeusa/walk/walking.htm.
  10. Kong LB, Lekawa M, Navarro RA, et al. Pedestrian-motor vehicle trauma: an analysis of injury profiles by age. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182:17-23.
  11. Pasanen E. Driving speeds and pedestrian Safety: A mathematical model. Copenhagen: Nordisk Kabel- og Traadfabriker; 1992:41.
  12. Smith S, Opiela K, Impett L. Planning and implementing pedestrian facilities in suburban and developing rural areas: Research report. Washington DC: National Research Council; 1987:92.
  13. Leaf W, Preusser D. Literature review on vehicle travel speeds and pedestrian injuries. Trumbull, CT 06611: Preusser Research Group, Inc.; 1999:67.
  14. Miles-Doan R, Kelly S. Inequities in health care and survival after injury among pedestrians: Explaining the urban/rural differential. J Rural Health. 1995;11:177-84.
  15. Wazana A, Krueger P, Raina P, Chambers L. A review of risk factors for child pedestrian injuries: Are they modifiable? [see comments]. Inj Prev. 1997;3:295-304.
  16. Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center. Child Pedestrians: Scope of Problem. Seattle, WA: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, 1997. Downloaded January 5, 2001 at http://depts.washington.edu/hiprc/childinjury/.
  17. Muttart J. Effects of Retroreflective Material Upon Pedestrian Identification at Night. ASTM Subcommittee Meeting on the establishment of Standards for Safety Clothing, 1998. Downloaded June 14, 2001 at http://docs.vircomnet.com/mobility/traffic_vc/pedestrian_identification.html.
  18. Guyer B, Talbot AM, Pless IB. Pedestrian injuries to children and youth. Pediatr Clin North Am 1985; 32:163-74.
  19. lassen TP, Morag MacKay J, Moher D, Walker A, Jones AL. Community-Based Injury Prevention Interventions. The Future of Children: Unintentional Injures in Childhood. 2000:10 (1):83-110.
  20. Schieber RA, Thompson NJ. Developmental risk factors for childhood pedestrian injuries. Inj Prev. 1996;2:228-36.
  21. Dunne RG, Asher KN, Rivara FP. Behavior and parental expectations of child pedestrians. Pediatrics 1992; 89:486-90.  

For more information:

National Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, a site of the Children’s Safety Network

National Farm Medicine Center
1000 North Oak Avenue
Marshfield, WI 54449
% 888-924-SAFE (7233)
Fax: 715-389-4996
Email: nccrahs@mmrf.mfldclin.edu

(updated: 7/24/02)

Take me to the Top!

Home Projects Resources Staff Site Map About Us NFMC

Copyright © 2000-2003 Marshfield Clinic. All rights reserved.