|
![](/peth04/20041105185958im_/http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/images/transparent4x1.gif) |
In a 1921 case before the U.S. Supreme Court involving the
business practices of trade associations, Justice Brandeis
wrote in the Court’s opinion about the role of trade
associations in providing information:
By substituting knowledge for ignorance….[information]
tends also to substitute research and reasoning for gambling
and piracy….In making such knowledge available to
the smallest concern, it creates among producers equality
of opportunity. In making it available, also, to purchasers
in the general public, it does all that can actually be
done to protect the community from extortion.
American Column & Lumber Company v. The United
States, 257 U.S. 377, 1921
Economists tend to speak less eloquently—but feel
every bit as passionately—about the importance of information
in facilitating fair and efficient exchange of goods between
buyers and sellers. To economists, information is the grease
for the wheels of the marketplace.
For goods like computers or cars, the marketplace is well-greased with several
sources of objective information, such as Consumer Reports magazine,
that help consumers assess quality and make informed buying decisions. Consumers
surely want safe food every bit as much as they want fast computers and reliable
cars, but it is very difficult for ordinary consumers to measure and assess
food safety. Economists have long argued that the so-called market for food
safety is “incomplete” because of the lack of accessible consumer
information.
Two articles in this issue make it clear that information has a growing role
in creating more workable markets for food safety. The feature on food safety
innovations explains how fast food chains and other buyers of large quantities
of meat use pathogen test results and other information to bolster the safety
of meat products delivered by their suppliers. These “savvy buyers” reward
suppliers for strengthening their food safety controls with price premiums
and long-term contracts, resulting in more efficient transactions between food
producers and retailers.
The feature on food traceability explains how information on the production
and distribution of food can help protect consumers from fraud and producers
from unfair competition. The information provided by traceability systems can
also help minimize the production and distribution of unsafe products by making
it easier to find and remove such products from the system. |
![photo: a tire on a rim](/peth04/20041105185958im_/http://www.ers.usda.gov/amberwaves/april04/upfront/upfronttire.jpg)
Photospin
|
As information systems
for food safety continue to evolve, the marketplace will
function more and more efficiently—and not just for
producers and retailers, but for consumers as well. We are
not there
yet, but it is no longer difficult to imagine an information
system for food safety as complete as Consumer Reports,
greasing the wheels for ordinary consumers and their marketplace.
![signature of Nicole Ballenger](/peth04/20041105185958im_/http://www.ers.usda.gov/amberwaves/april04/upfront/signature.gif)
Chief,
Diet, Safety, and Health Economics Branch
Food and Rural Economics Division, ERS
|
|
|