|
![](/peth04/20041028171517im_/http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/images/transparent4x1.gif) |
![photo: Traceability team members sitting around a restaurant table](/peth04/20041028171517im_/http://www.ers.usda.gov/amberwaves/April04/profiles/images/profilestraceability.jpg)
Thomas McDonald, USDA/ERS
|
The confirmation in December 2003 of a case of bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE, or mad cow disease) in the United States thrust
traceability to the forefront of the public consciousness. It was
the first time many Americans had ever heard of the concept of
tracking foods, food ingredients, and food animals as they move
from farms to processing to markets to consumers’ plates.
For the ERS Traceability Team, whose members are experts in food
labeling, food safety, biotechnology, commodity markets, and international
trade, traceability is far from an unknown concept. Team members
have been researching and analyzing different aspects of traceability
for the last few years. Their early efforts examined traceability
as it relates to genetically engineered crops, foods, and food
ingredients.
The team includes: Elise Golan and Fred Kuchler of the Food and Rural Economics
Division; and Linda Calvin, Barry Krissoff, and Kenneth Nelson of the Market
and Trade Economics Division. Team members authored the new traceability
briefing room on the ERS website,
and several related reports, including Traceability
in the U.S. Food Supply: Economic Theory and Industry Studies, Economics
of Food Labeling, and Country-of-Origin
Labeling: Theory and Observation. Two articles in this issue of Amber
Waves are drawn from this body of work. See Food Traceability: One
Ingredient in a Safe and Efficient Food Supply and Mandatory
Country-of-Origin Labeling—Will It Benefit Consumers?
In their recent traceability report, the researchers found that, for the most
part, the food industry is successfully developing and maintaining traceability
systems to meet changing objectives, though the speed and success of industry
responses have varied. Their analysis suggests that Government efforts to improve
the Nation’s traceback capabilities should focus on providing firms with
incentives to strengthen their safety and traceability systems without dictating
any specific process for doing so.
Up next for team members: an expansion of their traceability research into
other hot-button areas. They will be addressing
the role of government in facilitating trade when product safety and/or quality
is an issue, exploring the feasibility of animal
identification systems, and examining consumer demand for country-of-origin
labeling.
|