THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO Next Hit Forward New Bills Search Prev Hit Back HomePage Hit List Best Sections Help Contents Display
Congressional Record References
Printer Friendly Display - 4,129 bytes.[Help]
Billno should always have and extension i.e. h1.ih
HRES 568 IH
Mr. FEENEY (for himself, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. PITTS, Mr. HERGER, Mr. FORBES, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. DELAY, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. OTTER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. CRANE, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. HART, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. KELLER, Mr. TIAHRT, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. GOODE, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. CAMP, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. KLINE, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. CANNON, Mr. PENCE, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. OSE, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. RENZI, and Mr. FLAKE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
Whereas the Declaration of Independence announced that one of the chief causes of the American Revolution was that King George had `combined to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws';
Whereas the Supreme Court has recently relied on the judgments, laws, or pronouncements of foreign institutions to support its interpretations of the laws of the United States, most recently in Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 2474 (2003);
Whereas the Supreme Court has stated previously in Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898, 921 n.11 (1997), that `We think such comparative analysis inappropriate to the task of interpreting a constitution . . .';
Whereas Americans' ability to live their lives within clear legal boundaries is the foundation of the rule of law, and essential to freedom;
Whereas it is the appropriate judicial role to faithfully interpret the expression of the popular will through laws enacted by duly elected representatives of the American people and our system of checks and balances;
Whereas Americans should not have to look for guidance on how to live their lives from the often contradictory decisions of any of hundreds of other foreign organizations; and
Whereas inappropriate judicial reliance on foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncments threatens the sovereignty of the United States, the separation of powers and the President's and the Senate's treaty-making authority: Now, therefore, be it
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO Next Hit Forward New Bills Search Prev Hit Back HomePage Hit List Best Sections Help Contents Display