This web site was copied prior to January 20, 2005. It is now a Federal record managed by the National Archives and Records Administration. External links, forms, and search boxes may not function within this collection. Learn more.   [hide]

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 41

Ayurvedic Interventions for Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review


Under its Evidence-based Practice Program, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is developing scientific information for other agencies and organizations on which to base clinical guidelines, performance measures, and other quality improvement tools. Contractor institutions review all relevant scientific literature on assigned clinical care topics and produce evidence reports and technology assessments, conduct research on methodologies and the effectiveness of their implementation, and participate in technical assistance activities.

Overview / Reporting the Evidence / Methodology / Findings / Future Research / Availability of the Full Report


The objective of this evidence report was to conduct a search of the published literature on the use of Ayurvedic medicine/therapies for the treatment of health conditions and, on the basis of that search, to choose either a condition or a modality for a comprehensive review. A broad search of Ayurvedic medicine/therapies showed that there was sufficient literature to support a systematic review of the use of Ayurvedic therapies for the treatment of diabetes. Diabetes is a common illness, and many traditional medical systems have developed strategies to treat this condition. The Ayurvedic therapy most commonly used to treat diabetes was herbal therapy, which therefore became the primary focus of this review. A small number of studies looking at diet therapy were also found.

Empirical evidence of efficacy for the Ayurvedic treatment of diabetes would be helpful to health care providers managing diabetic patients and would be useful in identifying areas for future research. The specific questions addressed in this project were:

  1. What Ayurvedic therapies have been reported in the literature, for which conditions/body systems, and using what kinds of research designs?
  2. What is the efficacy of Ayurvedic medicine/therapies for the treatment of diabetes?

Return to Contents

Reporting the Evidence

An initial broad search of the literature found 2,565 titles, of which 1,214 were judged to represent Ayurvedic therapies that were neither veterinary nor agricultural in nature and thus potentially relevant to our review. To answer our first research question, these 1,214 titles were screened for subject, language, body system/disease state, study population, and study design. To answer our second research question, we further assessed the potentially relevant articles, including literature received from India. Fifty-four articles containing the results of 62 human clinical studies using Ayurvedic therapy for diabetes were identified. These studies were analyzed in detail to determine if evidence existed regarding the efficacy of Ayurvedic therapy for diabetes.

Return to Contents


A panel of technical experts representing diverse disciplines was established to advise us throughout the course of our research. A number of databases were searched: MEDLINE®, HealthSTAR, EMBASE®, Allied and Complementary Medicine™, MANTIS™, BIOSIS Previews®, CAB HEALTH, and CINAHL®. We used the MeSH terms "Ayurveda" or "Ayurvedic" combined with the botanical names of 16 herbs commonly used in Ayurvedic treatment. In addition, a strategy was developed to identify and retrieve literature from India. This involved using an abstracting service in India to identify potentially relevant literature.

There was no language restriction in the Western literature search. The Indian search was limited to studies published in English because we could not read studies in other languages and did not have the resources to have them translated. Additional articles were identified from supplemental searches that focused on the Ayurvedic herbs most often used for diabetes, on review articles, and on citations of articles. All titles, abstracts, and articles were reviewed by two reviewers, and all disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Data were collected using screening forms that we developed for this purpose. We analyzed the data regarding the general characteristics of the Ayurveda literature and used this information to select a topic for a focused review.

We then conducted a focused literature review using the articles we had identified from the Western literature and abstracts of articles published in India. We selected all articles identified as studying Ayurvedic therapies for diabetes in either the initial or the focused search. We identified 54 articles containing the results of 62 studies in this manner. Because of the heterogeneity of these studies, a meta-analysis was not possible. Approximately one-third of the studies were subjected to further analysis in which we calculated a common effect statistic. We also conducted a qualitative analysis on these studies.

Return to Contents


Return to Contents

Future Research

Our review has identified a number of interesting areas for future research. Basic scientific studies of Ayurvedic medicine have not been rigorously pursued. There are currently few RCTs and CCTs in the literature, which hinders the assessment of efficacy. Future trials need to enroll an adequate number of subjects. Interventions should be compared to placebo preparations, and care should be taken to construct placebos that cannot be distinguished from the trial drug.

The clinical trials of Ayurvedic therapies for diabetes need to be better reported. The method of patient selection and assignment to arms needs to be better described, and the reporting of results should follow good statistical practice. In addition, the trials need to be of sufficient length to determine a relevant clinical effect.

It would also be useful to investigate the efficacy of single-herb therapies versus the relatively complex Ayurvedic formulas used. It is not clear from the currently available literature if the formulas provide any additional benefit over single-herb therapies.

Field studies to determine how Ayurvedic medicine is used in real-life clinical practice should be conducted. The interaction between botanicals and other Ayurvedic modalities (yoga, for example) on diabetes could be assessed. The relationship between Ayurvedic diagnosis and Western diagnosis needs to be established.

Furthermore, trials incorporating more sophisticated diabetes research should be conducted. Studies evaluating the impact of Ayurveda using more current methods of assessing diabetes are also needed.

Return to Contents

Availability of the Full Report

The full evidence report from which this summary was taken was prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality by the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center/RAND under contract No. 290-97-0001. Print copies may be obtained free of charge from the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse by calling 1-800-358-9295. Requesters should ask for Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 41, Ayurvedic Interventions for Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review (AHRQ Publication No. 01-E040).

The Evidence Report is also online at or can be downloaded as a zipped file at

Return to Contents

AHRQ Publication Number 01-E039
Current as of June 2001

Internet Citation:

Ayurvedic Interventions for Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 41. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E039, June 2001. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.

Return EPC Evidence Reports
Clinical Information
AHRQ Home Page
Department of Health and Human Services