Research Awards:
Environments, Organizations, and Jobs: The Causes and Consequences of
Workplace Gender Segregation
Award number: 9511572
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $92,761
Investigator: William T. Bielby
Sponsor: University of California, Santa Barbara
This study examines the causes and consequences of gender segregation in the
workplace. It draws on theories in cognitive social psychology,
institutional organizational theory, and labor economics to construct
hypotheses about the conditions affecting individuals, jobs, organizations,
and their environments. Multiple data sources will be examined, including a
unique data set made up of class action suits relating to gender
discrimination. Statistical models are used to assess the following
questions: 1) why the gender composition of jobs varies within and across
organizations, 2) the mechanisms through which the gender composition of
jobs influence earnings and career advancement, and 3) the relationship
among gender, job segregation, and work effort.
This research explores the ways organizational structures and processes
shape labor market outcomes for men and women. It will search new empirical
sources for evidence to contribute to the continuing debate on gender
segregation in the workplace. It will also clarify the impact of Equal
Opportunity legislation on labor market dynamics.
Collusion in Exchange Networks: An Experimental Study
Award number: 9422883
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $118,160
Investigator: Phillip Bonacich
Sponsor: University of California, Los Angeles
This is a study of collusion in exchange networks. A series of laboratory
experiments, using a variety of networks of exchange and communication, will
test hypotheses about the positions in social networks most likely to
develop coalitions with each other, and the shapes of networks most
conducive to coalition formation. This research springs from the theoretical
work of Richard Emerson, who proposed that power in exchange networks tends
to equalize. Those initially with less power have strategies available to
increase their power, among which is the possibility of forming
countervailing coalitions. Individuals with less initial power can increase
their power by forming a single bargaining unit. The designs of previous
experiments have precluded this possibility by preventing non-bargaining
subjects from communicating with each other. The present research project
suggests a model predicting which positions will form coalitions in exchange
networks, and a series of experiments will test the model. The model is an
advance over Emerson's in two respects. First, it implies that coalitions
may form between weak positions that do not share a common trading partner,
and it predicts that coalitions may form between classes of positions that
are quite remotely connected in the network. Emerson's model was limited to
weak positions that shared a common trading partner. Second, it describes a
new incentive for forming coalitions: the reduction of uncertainty in
unstable networks. Unlike coalitions of the weak, these are coalitions
between exchange partners.
This project is fundamental research on the ways that coalitions may affect
the power of individuals in social networks of various shapes, and thus it
addresses crucial questions in theories of social capital. The work is
connected to emerging new theories of latent classes that can be tested in
the laboratory and then extended to help explain degrees of inequality in
actual communities. The structure of social networks may turn out to be a
major factor shaping the rewards individuals receive in social exchanges,
quite apart from the effect of their skills or other previously recognized
attributes of human capital.
Data Collection for the International Social Survey Program
Award number: 9511023
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $209,176
Investigators: James A. Davis and Thomas W. Smith
Sponsor: National Opinion Research Center
This research is the American part of an ongoing project in 22 countries to
collect comparable survey data on key social issues and processes. In the
present study, a national sample of adult respondents will be asked their
feelings about issues related to natiolal identity and their views of the
role of government. Data on national identity will identify some of the
subnational and supranational pressures that threaten the viability of
states and test hypotheses about factors leading to order and stability.
Data on the role of government will provide continuity with earlier studies
and will allow the tracking of changes in the attitudes of citizens toward
government.
Participation in the International Social Survey Program represents an
important part of the leadership role that the United States plays in
international social science. This research ensures the continuing
availability of high quality cross-national data otherwise inaccessible to
individual researchers. The data also make an important contribution to
teaching by providing graduate students with materials for theses and
undergraduates with experience in analyzing data.
Wage Trajectories in Occupations Segregated by Gender and Race
Award number: 9422236
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $102,576
Investigator: Paula England
Sponsor: University of Arizona
This is a study of wage trajectories in sex-segregated and race-segregated
jobs, using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, with survey
waves each year between 1979 and 1994, and information on when workers
changed employers. This research assesses whether favorable industrial
placement affects wage levels and returns to seniority to the same degree
for jobs with all race and sex compositions. The alternative hypothesis is
that industrial premiums, in higher wages or steeper wage trajectories,
apply primarily to jobs filled largely by white males. If this is true, then
the effects of sex and race composition on wages are greater in industries
with higher wages. Theories of "new structuralists" posit that high-wage
industries and firms also have steeper returns to seniority, because of
union-negotiated seniority-based raises or internal labor markets. Yet the
claim has never been tested on data with measures of seniority, nor has the
possible interaction of such effects with sex and race composition been
explored. The present research fills this crucial gap.
Scientific contributions of this Human Capital project include assessment of
whether: 1) the sex and race composition of jobs affects wage levels, with
composition measured for more detailed job categories than in previous
research; 2) the sex and race composition of jobs affects wage growth with
seniority; 3) higher paying firms also offer steeper wage growth as
seniority within an organization accumulates; 4) the sex and race
composition of jobs interacts with industry and firm characteristics such
that premiums in industries and organizations with higher starting wages and
higher returns to seniority accrue primarily to jobs filled by white males;
and 5) effects of industry or sex and race composition have diminished or
increased in recent years as the economy has restructured. Learning the
truth concerning these hypotheses will clarify the extent to which both
individuals and the nation suffer from the under-utilization of the skills
and abilities of many Americans.
Expected Value Model of Social Exchange
Award number: 9511782
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $135,956
Investigator: Noah E. Friedkin
Sponsor: University of California, Santa Barbara
This is a theoretical analysis and laboratory study of social exchange,
based on an expected value model of social power. In this model a power
structure indicates opportunities for exchange relations and a sample space
of exchange networks. The approach incorporates a micro-model of bargaining
that predicts exchange outcomes in each of these possible exchange networks.
When drawing on observed relative frequencies of exchange networks (such as
arise during repetitive trials of an experiment), the expected value model
currently provides the most accurate account of the distribution of benefits
among actors in exchange networks. However, the model does not predict the
relative frequency of exchange networks that may arise during the exchange
process and, in one instance, it fails to account for the observed
distribution of exchange payoffs. The model now has been elaborated to
include an account of the incidence of exchange networks, and it addresses
the anomalous finding reported in the literature. The present project will
assess the elaborated model both analytically and empirically, in comparison
with a competing graph-theoretic model, employing a set of networks that
have not been previously examined in the literature, for which the two
approaches make markedly contrasting predictions.
This is fundamental research on exchange, bargaining and power in social
networks, an area of research that is rapidly coming to a clear consensus
about the mathematical laws that describe a range of important phenomena.
Rigorous understanding of the dynamic and structural factors that influence
the concentration of social capital in real-world networks of exchange
depends upon working out the abstract relationships in theory and laboratory
experiments such as conducted in this project.
Family Social Capital and Academic Achievement of Immigrant
Children
Award number: 9512108
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $80,132
Investigator: Lingxin Hao
Sponsor: University of Iowa
This is a study of family social capital and academic achievement of
immigrant children. Four kinds of family social capital are identified as
relevant to child educational outcomes: 1) Networks with members of the
extended family, such as grandparents; 2) parent involvement in school, for
example attending parent-teacher meetings; 3) immigrant and ethnic culture;
4) parent-child interaction, such as supervising homework and discussing
materials learned in class. Theories on how these factors operate to enhance
education will be tested using data from NELS:88, a longitudinal survey that
collected data on eighth graders in 1988 with two follow-up waves at
two-year intervals, including oversamples of Asian and Hispanic students.
The analysis will involve three phases. First, cross-sectional analysis of
data on eight and twelfth graders will examine the creation and maintenance
of family social capital and identify its level effects. Second,
longitudinal analysis of academic achievement growth among Asian and
Hispanic immigrant students from eighth to twelfth grade will identify the
effect of changes in family social capital on achievement growth. Third, the
analyses in the first two phases will be extended to compare immigrant
results with those for the native-born children.
This study will contribute to the advancement of our knowledge about the
role of the family in children's academic achievement, by testing the effect
of family social capital on the reproduction of human capital in children
and comparing the results across immigrant and native-born ethnic groups. It
will also provide evidence for designing policies to strengthen the family
and school-family connections and help in the allocation of public resources
to improve parents' human capital and family social capital.
The Structure of Social and Economic Isolation in Underclass
Populations
Award number: 9512005
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $119,823
Investigators: Jeanne S. Hurlbert, Michael D. Irwin, Edward S. Shihadeh,
John J. Beggs, and Charles M. Tolbert
Sponsor: Louisiana State University
This is a study of the structure of social and economic isolation in
low-income populations. The project investigates three problems; the first
two relate to social capital theory, whereas the third is methodological.
First, the investigators will examine the micro-level behaviors and social
structures relevant to spatial mismatch theory, which concerns the lack of
low-skill employment opportunities in the immediate vicinity. Second, the
investigators will test the hypothesis that inner-city residents
paradoxically rely primarily on strong ties (e.g., close friends, relatives)
for day-to-day assistance, but lack the weak ties (friends of friends,
acquaintances) which would aid them in such instrumental action as
job-finding. Third, the work will explore the efficacy of standard survey
data collection methods in an inner-city neighborhood. This will be done
through interviews with 600 residents of a poor neighborhood in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana.
This project will improve our understanding of the social roots of the
increasing problems of low-income neighborhoods, including high rates of
poverty, unemployment, teenage pregnancy drug use, serious crime, and other
indicators of social disorganization. It will examine the linkage of
economic isolation (poverty and welfare dependence, loss of economic
capital, lack of access to jobs) with social isolation (the isolation of
low-income persons from mainstream individuals and institutions, and their
inability to gain access to the information, influence, and other
job-finding assistance that would allow them to escape poverty). The study
will be a major step forward in testing theories about the roots of poverty.
Interorganizational Networks and the Changing Employment Contract
Award number: 9507964
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $138,418
Investigator: Arne L. Kalleberg
Sponsor: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
COLLABORATIVE WITH:
Award number: 9507914
Expected total amount: $394,902
Investigator: David H. Knoke
Sponsor: University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
COLLABORATIVE WITH:
Award number: 9511715
Expected total amount: $122,966
Investigator: Peter V. Marsden
Sponsor: Harvard University
This is a study of how work establishments form ties with other
organizations in order to recruit and train workers. Using a national sample
of work establishments, stratified by size, in a two-wave panel, questions
will be asked about how those firms rely on outside organizations for labor
contracting and job training. Hypotheses tested deal with the effects of
stable organizational environments, tight labor markets, the role of labor
unions, and the institutionalization of common practices in labor
contracting and job training. By relying on a network perspective to
determine how links with recruiting and contracting organizations shape
individual firm decisions, this research makes a theoretical contribution
that sets it apart from two prevailing views. In one, there is the
assumption that labor costs are entirely external to the firm, and thus
dependent on market relations. In the other, there is the contrary
assumption that labor costs are entirely internal and therefore subject only
to hierarchical relations. Instead, these researchers look at
interorganizational networks as the basis of change within firms.
This research addresses fundamental questions about how changes in the
formation of human capital may be taking place when employers establish ties
with outside orgaanizations for the recruitmen and training of workers. It
will demonstrate how the characteristics of network relations between
employers and their sources of labor recruitment and training affect the the
employing firms and the opportunities available to their workers. Research
findings will have major implications for understanding how cost and quality
are affected by these recruitment and training practices.
Structural Determinants of Race-Sex Labor Market Segregation and
Earnings
Award number: 9422800
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $198,009
Investigator: Robert L. Kaufman
Sponsor: Ohio State University
This is a study of structural determinants of race-sex labor market
segregation and earnings. It will analyze differences between race and
gender groups in their distribution across industrial and occupational
segments and in the rewards they received from these positions, using census
data from 1980 and 1990. The work has three chief goals. First, it will
describe the linkage of rewards and allocation differentials, using an
earnings decomposition analysis which explicitly models the impact of the
differential distribution of race-sex groups across labor market positions.
This structural decomposition measures the extent to which earnings gaps
among race-sex groups can be attributed to: (1) group mean differences in
characteristics; (2) group differences in returns to characteristics, and
(3) group differences in their distributions across work positions that have
varying rewards. The second goal is to assess the linkage of allocation and
rewards differentials using a causal model of their determinants and their
inter-relationship. A two-stage model will be used to test hypotheses drawn
from an integration of segmented market theory and race-sex queue theory.
Predictors include structural contexts and conditions of work, aspects of
sex and race-stereotyped work situations, and the population redistribution
of the work force across positions. The third objective is to update and
disseminate improved measures of contemporary industrial structure.
This project will lead to an improved understanding of how race and gender
affect the utilization and financial reward of human capital in the United
States. For example, it will help us understand the extent to which the
concentration of blacks and women in low-paying jobs affects the average
incomes of these groups, in contrast with the underpayment of these groups
in the same jobs held by whites and males. In addition, the research will
clarify the extent to which both individuals and the nation suffer from the
under-utilization of the skills and abilities of many Americans.
Residential Patterns of Minorities in the Metropolis
Award number: 9507920
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $174,302
Funding was provided by the Department of Housing and Urban Development
Investigators: John R. Logan and Richard D. Alba
Sponsor: State University of New York, Albany
This is a study of residential patterns of minorities in the metropolis. It
will examine two important aspects of residential patterns that are only
indirectly captured by the traditional use of segregation indices. The first
is the geographic configuration of areas of minority group concentration as
"ethnic" or "minority" neighborhoods. The second is the determinants of
individual locational choices and outcomes. The study will include New York,
Chicago and Los Angeles and examine white, blacks, Hispanics and Asians in
each region. A more detailed analysis will focus on the major white ethnic
groups (such as Italians, Irish, Germans) and on national-origin subgroups
among Hispanics (e.g., Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, Dominicans), Asians (e.g.,
Chinese, Koreans), and blacks (treating separately blacks from the larger
non-US origin groups such as the English-speaking Caribbeans and Haitians).
The project will begin by calculating descriptive measures of the extent of
segregation in each area, and then test a variety of hypotheses concerning
ethnic concentration, drawn from the more recent sociological theories,
including the underclass and the ethnic enclave models.
This research will increase our knowledge about the degree to which several
ethnic and racial groups are becoming concentrated in certain urban
neighborhoods, and it will provide a scientific understanding of the factors
that cause such concentration. This is vital information on which to base
policy decisions concerning housing, city services, and schooling. In
addition, it will contribute to our understanding of the persistent
disadvantage suffered by some ethnic groups and neighborhoods.
The Evaluation of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
Award number: 9511461
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $102,630
Investigator: Michael W. Macy
Sponsor: Brandeis University
This study is designed to systematically map the evolution of cooperation in
a game where actors can avoid those they do not trust. It departs from a
long tradition in game theory, in which studies of the Prisoners' Dilemma
rested on the assumption that actors were not free to walk away from
undesirable partners. Computer simulations are used to systematically
explore the conditions under which actors learn when and with whom to
interact, to be later tested in laboratory experiments with human subjects.
The computer simulation uses artificial neural networks to model a
self-organizing system of interdependent, co-adaptive actors. The results
are expected to produce a learning theory model of adaptation to changing
conditions, relevant to the individual participant, in contrast to current
theories based on the Prisoners' Dilemma, which assume that adaptation
occurs through changes at the population level.
The proposed research will make fundamental contributions to social theory
by offering new insights into the ways individuals learn to handle social
dilemmas . It makes comparably innovative methodological contributions
through the use of artificial neural networks. These are also used to
provide a more realistic construction of social dilemmas that promises to be
applicable outside the laboratory.
Social Processes in Exchange Networks
Award number: 9422974
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $93,092
Investigator: Barry Markovsky and Michael J. Lovaglia
Sponsor: University of Iowa
This is a study of social processes in exchange networks. It extends a
program of theory-based investigations on power and social exchange into
other fundamental sociological and social psychological processes: status,
distributive justice, and legitimacy. The foundation for this research,
Network Exchange Theory has been tested chiefly within a specialized type of
experimental exchange setting in which agents linked in networks negotiate
over pools of resources under various conditions that govern transactions.
This new research will broaden the scope of Network Exchange Theory by
developing and testing exchange settings more akin to those found in
society. To this end, the researchers will adapt their experimental paradigm
to permit valued resources to enter the exchange system at different network
locations, and to move through the network as exchanges transpire. Agents in
the network thus engage in true exchanges of one type of resource for
another, rather than the simpler single-resource pool-divisions of previous
experiments. After calibrating the new setting and running tests with
different network structures, the researchers will integrate the social
processes. Status, distributive justice, and legitimacy are all predicted to
have specific, independent effects on resource distribution in exchange
networks. These occur through their influence on negotiation tactics and
evaluations of exchange outcomes, and are modeled by the theory.
This set of experiments is fundamental scientific research on social
capital, the capacity to gain resources that an individual may have on the
basis of position in a social network and of socially-ascribed status. Thus
it is a contribution to the fundamental knowledge base concerning human
capital, testing and developing formal models of how factors beyond
individual skill and motivation may affect the incomes and careers of
individuals.
Selection and Description Bias in Newspaper Coverage of Protest Amidst a
Democratic Transition: The Case of Minsk, Belarus
Award number: 9523439
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $36,513
Investigator: John D. McCarthy
Sponsor: Catholic University
This is an award under the Small Grants for Exploratory Research (SGER). It
is a study of newspaper coverage of public protest during a democratic
transition in Belarus. Belarus has begun to allow public demonstrations of
protest and the government now issues permits for peaceful demonstrations.
The study has the quality of a natural experiment, in which the researchers
will be able to obtain data both before and after the permitting system. The
study will contribute to theories about the relation among protest, media
coverage, and state activity and about the process of democratization.
Analysis is based on a systematic review of police records and major
newspapers from 1988 to 1995.
This research will contribute to a sociological understanding of the efforts
to control violent conflict through government permits allowing peaceful
demonstrations and of newspaper bias in how such demonstations are reported.
An examination of these events in Belarus will demonstrate the conditions
that contribute to the development of democratic institutions. In addition
to the scientific gains from this research, it will develop scientific ties
with researchers in Belarus.
Perceptions of Success and Failure in the Fall of the German
Democratic Republic (GDR)
Award number: 9423547
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $17,425
Investigator: Carol Mueller
Sponsor: Arizona State University, Tempe
This is a women's research planning grant to prepare a study of perceptions
of success and failure in the fall of the German Democratic Republic, that
will advance the scientific understanding of processes of democratization.
It will support travel by the investigator to the former German Democratic
Republic and consultation with German social movement scholars and activists
in Berlin, Leipzig, and Dresden, three cities central to the civic movement
mobilization. Consultations will concern appropriate questions and format
for an interview schedule and for a sampling strategy that will address the
complexities of the changing composition of the opposition groups in the
three cities over the course of 1989-1990, social movement careers of
activists selected from these groups before and since that period, and
differences in the composition, goals and success perceptions of activists
in the three cities.
This grant will provide the information necessary for writing an NSF grant
proposal to support interviewing in each of the three cities on differences
in the opposition movement and the careers of activists. This work is
supported under the Research Planning Grant program for women scientists and
engineers, and thus among its chief aims are to assist a promising woman
social scientist to prepare for a major research project, and to expand the
scientific personnel of the United States. The results of this study will be
valuable for policy-makers attempting to understand the social process of
democratization in formerly totalitarian societies.
Comparative Research on Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Protests and
Demonstrations
Award number: 9511748
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $122,246
Investigator: Pamela E. Oliver
Sponsor: University of Wisconsin, Madison
This study is designed to complete a three-city comparison of selection bias
in the coverage of protests and demonstrations. It compares a state capitol
in the United States with one in Germany and with the national capitol. The
research is tied to theories of social movements and collective action that
emphasize the interaction among institutionalized and non-institutionalized
forms of politics. Those theories give a central place to the role of the
mass media in spreading the message of protesting groups and shaping
evaluations of their importance. The research systematically examines the
ways in which the mass media report demonstrations and protests compared to
information about those events from official sources.
The proposed research will contribute to theories of democracy that focus on
the role of protest in enabling large numbers of people to demonstrate their
concerns and to persuade others of the importance of their cause. It will
also enlarge theories about the role of the mass media in spreading news
about protest and in both encouraging others to take up the cause and to
suppress it. There is also an important methodological contribution that
will result from its findings about the nature and extent of bias in
coverage. These findings will aid researchers who now rely on newspaper
reports as their primary source of information on protests and
demonstrations without knowing the directions of bias.
Prototype Internet Services for the General Social Survey
Award number: 9422556
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $101,920
Investigator: Richard C. Rockwell
Sponsor: University of Michigan
COLLABORATIVE WITH:
Award number: 9422785
Expected total amount: $137,808
Investigators: Thomas W. Smith and Reginald P. Baker
Sponsor: National Opinion Research Center
This is a prototype Internet service for the General Social Survey employing
NCSA Mosaic. The project will develop a system to provide enhanced access to
survey data, using the General Social Survey for implementation of these
integrated services, which will subsequently be extended to a variety of
other survey data sets. These services will provide facilities for hypertext
viewing and searching of complete survey documentation, customized and
documented extracts from data sets, statistical analysis, and File Transfer
Protocol delivery of full or extracted data sets. The General Social Survey
is an ideal source of survey material to develop the system, because it is a
highly diverse large dataset of complex structure, extensively documented in
terms of publications based on each item, and has already been the basis of
more than three thousand scientific publications and dissertations. The
system developed on the General Social Survey will then become the standard
not only for providing survey data over Internet, but also for research
design and data collection in new surveys.
This project is part of the Digital Library Initiative, adding questionnaire
survey data to the kinds of information that can be managed effectively over
Internet and contributing to the national information infrastructure. Not
only is the General Social Survey widely used in scientific research, but it
has proven to be an excellent teaching tool at both the graduate and
undergraduate levels. Survey data are used extensively in government and
commerce, so an advanced system for managing and distributing information of
this kind will contribute to effective government and economic growth.
Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Accomplishment-Based
Renewal
Award number: 9422805
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $112,130
Investigator: Steven Ruggles
Sponsor: University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
This is a project to create unified documentation for individual-level
samples of the United States census, covering the years: 1850, 1880, 1900,
1910, 1920, 1940, 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990. These microdata have proven to
be a valuable resource, since they allow researchers to make tabulations
tailored to their specific research questions and to overcome
incompatibilities in the published census tabulations. In addition, the
public use microdata samples have made it possible for researchers to move
beyond simple tabular analysis and apply increasingly sophisticated
multivariate techniques. This project will enhance the compatibility of
variables over time and incorporate the 1850 and 1920 census years into the
data series.
The public use microdata samples from United States population censuses are
of great value in several fields of social science, permitting a variety of
researchers to carry out scientific tests of general theories concerning
socio-economic trends, migration patterns, social change, and several other
aspects of American life. Proper documentation and comparability of
variables and coding across samples will increase the value of the data sets
for researchers and educators. Already some of these data and codebooks are
available over Internet or the World Wide Web, and they will be an important
part of the national information infrastructure
The Gender Division of Family Work Over the Life Course
Award number: 9510584
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $18,000
Investigator: Laura Sanchez
Sponsor: Tulane University
This proposal for a Research Planning Grant is intended to carry out
research on how time is defined and used. Results will be used to plan a
follow-up study about perceptions of fairness in work allocations and how
these may affect life course transitions. It adds to theories about family
stability and to generalizations about the demography of the life course by
its focus on the importance of the time it takes to fulfill work and family
obligations. Existing data sources at both the national and state level are
analyzed to expand definitions of time use and the scope of how time use may
affect important life course events. Focus group interviews with both men
and women will be conducted to explore the meanings that subjects attribute
to how they use time, particularly with respect to fairness in the
allocation of household responsibilities by gender. The results of the
quantitative analysis and the focus group interviews will form the basis for
the design of a new study, directly concerned with how beliefs about gender
roles are associated with conflict between household partners and how
beliefs affect transitions to marriage, cohabitation, or divorce.
The prevalence of households where two adults work outside the home, along
with the customary demands in running a household, are important for the
formation of the family's social capital. Although the division of labor
within the household begins with tasks, this research promises new insights
into how the family functions by focusing on how much time those tasks take.
With time the critical variable, the investigator will be able to move to a
consideration of beliefs about fairness in the allocation of tasks, and
their relation to interfamilial conflict and familial stability.
Testing and Extending a Dynamic Model for Interaction in Discussion
Groups
Award number: 9511127 Award Instr.: Standard Grant
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $31,965
Investigator: John Skvoretz
Sponsor: University of SC Columbia
COLLABORATIVE WITH:
Award number: 9511514
Expected total amount: $120,354
Investigators: Murray Webster and Joseph M. Whitmeyer
Sponsor: University of North Carolina, Charlotte
This is a study of how decisions are made in small groups. It tests and
extends a new model of interaction previously developed by one of the
investigators and already considered an important advance. The model takes
into account the effects of status differences among group members and how
their interaction develops to predict patterns of interaction and the
emergence of structures of inequality. The model has the added advantage of
taking into account the effects of non-participants on outcomes. Data are
collected from 80 four-person groups that vary in status characteristics.
The research will contribute to a fundamental understanding of how groups
reach decisions by taking into account the status characteristics that
individuals bring to the group, their expectations about distributions of
power, and the nature of the task performed. Carefully collected data will
be prepared to form a data bank for other small group researchers.
Escaping Distressed Neighborhoods
Award number: 9511732
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $140,475
Investigator: Scott J. South
Sponsor: State University of New York, Albany
This research is designed to study patterns and determinants of residential
mobility out of distressed neighborhoods in U.S. metropolitan areas. It is
concerned with understanding racial differences in mobility, in particular,
the characteristics of individuals, families, and social contexts that allow
some minority group members to leave poor neighborhoods for more desirable
ones. Data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics' Geocode-Match Files and
Census Extract Datasets will be used to select a nationally representative
sample of families and individuals and to test three theoretical models of
residential mobility. The human capital/life stage model argues that
residential mobility is a concomitant of social and occupational mobility
and of life cycle changes. The place model focuses on barriers to mobility,
especially those caused by racial discrimination. The housing availability
model relates moving to availability and to the constraints of renting or
ownership.
This research should contribute to new models of intra-metropolitan mobility
by taking into account the full range of relevant variables that can affect
moving by individuals and families located in distressed neighborhoods. By
explicitly modeling the effects of racial discrimination on housing search
and location choice it will provide a comprehensive examination of barriers
against and opportunities for residential mobility. The research should
result in attaching probabilities to the links between human capital and
neighborhoods, family, poverty, and disadvantage. Findings should be useful
to policy makers concerned with these issues as well as to social scientists
looking for more comprehensive theories.
Social Stratification in China in a Period of Transition
Award number: 9423453
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $324,684
Investigators: Donald J. Treiman and Ivan Szelenyi
Sponsor: University of California, Los Angeles
This is a study of social stratification in China. It will administer and
analyze a survey of a large scale national probability sample in the
People's Republic of China, consisting of both urban and rural adults,
village leaders, intelligentsia, entrepreneurs, and administrators of
organizations. The aim of this research is (a) to better understand the
system, of social stratification and mobility in China, particularly during
the recent period of market transition, but also earlier periods in the
Communist Era, particularly the Cultural Revolution; (b) to test specific
theories about the effect of the market transition on the relative
importance of political and economic assets; and (c) to compare China to
Eastern Europe, where the investigators are also conducting research, to
test various theories about the role of institutional arrangements in social
mobility.
An important feature of this project will be the creation of a sizable
research team of Chinese and U.S.-based researchers that will work together
for several years on the analysis of data and writing of research reports, a
research team that will overlap with and coordinate their work with a
similarly-constituted research group from six countries in eastern Europe.
Thus the project goes a long way toward creation of a world-wide network of
scientists conducting research on democratization and market transition. The
findings of the research will guide American policy makers in understanding
the vast social and economic changes currently in progress in China, the
most populous nation on earth and a vast market for American industry.
Gender Inequalities Across Metropolitan Labor Markets
Award number: 9422546
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $73,492
Investigator: Reeve D. Vanneman
Sponsor: University of Maryland, College Park
This is a study of gender inequalities across metropolitan labor markets.
Existing theory suggests that a principal cause promoting gender equality is
the growth of women's labor force participation. Participation rates are
themselves consequences of the demand for female labor, especially of the
degree to which a labor market has high concentrations of female-dominated
occupations. A high demand for female labor reduces other aspects of gender
inequality through market, normative, and political mechanisms. This
research will test the normative linkages by using survey data aggregated to
the area level. The political linkages will be tested with data from Equal
Employment Opportunity complaints and from other more general indicators of
women's political mobilization. Testing these ideas requires combining area
and individual data into three contextual analyses. First, area measures of
labor demand, norms, mobilization, and occupation will be related to the
size of the gender coefficient in a standard earnings function predicting
hourly wages. Second, the demand, normative, and political contexts will be
related to the gender composition of a worker's occupation. Third, a
standard labor supply analysis will be extended to include a measure of the
occupational composition of the area's labor force. A final analysis will
summarize all the contextual relationships within a single framework with
areas rather than individuals as the unit of analysis.
This research differs from earlier work on gender differences in the rewards
to human capital by emphasizing the role played by the economic, social, and
political environment in which women find themselves. Only some of the
progress towards gender equality that we have witnessed in recent years can
be understood as the result of the changing characteristics of individual
women. This project will systematically examine how differences in labor
markets, normative climate, and political mobilization might explain more of
the variation in gender equality than do studies based on individuals alone.
Thus it will strengthen our understanding of socio-political factors that
shape the rewards men and women receive for the human capital they possess.
The Impact of Democratization on Russian Families
Award number: 9511736
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $148,223
Investigator: Dana Vannoy
Sponsor: University of Cincinnati
This is a study of sex equality, gender attitudes and quality of
relationship in Russian marriages, interviewing a random sample of 1400
households in Moscow and its rural environs. Russia today presents a curious
mix of ideology and attitudes making it a important setting for research on
changing power relationships between the sexes. The contradictory factors
include: the heritage of the Communist regime which supposed gender
equality; the presence of an entrenched patriarchy and general lack of
awareness of socially constructed elements of gender difference; and the
recent return to subjugating women in the family. The theory to be tested
predicts that when spouses have traditional gender attitudes and wife's
occupational prestige, educational achievement or income are equal or
superior to husband's, partners will experience lower marital quality and
the wife will be more at risk for abuse. If the spouses have liberal gender
attitudes, the theory predicts, equal or superior wife status will not
diminish their marital quality. In addition to testing this and related
theories, the project will provide baseline information about the quality of
Russian marriages that will be valuable for future studies.
The large-scale processes of democratization and market transition occurring
in Russia and many other nations have serious consequences on the small
scale of family units. It may be the case that greater democracy at the
level of the society produces, at least for the duration of a transition
period, less democracy within families. Or, it may be that the short-term
consequences for families of democratization may depend in large part upon
the attitudes that family members bring to their relationships with each
other. Thus, this study will test general scientific theories about the
effect of great social stress on families, as well as providing a much
clearer picture of Russian marriages in this time of great challenge for
their society.
Securing Social Rights: Subordinate Group Challenges to Educational
Policy and the Transformation of Public Education 1880 to 1920
Award number: 9511835
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $50,932
Investigator: Pamela B. Walters
Sponsor: Indiana University, Bloomington
This study looks at Progressive-era conflict over education and educational
policy in four states to answer questions about when, and how effectively,
disadvantaged groups mobilize to influence the state. It draws on existing
theories on social movements, the state, group conflict, and educational
reform to develop new theories for explain the processes by which
subordinate groups acquire concerns about education and the means to
pressure the state to adopt their policy objectives. Critical attention is
paid to formal organizations that mobilize individuals and present group
demands and to the local and state structures that provide opportunities for
influencing policy. The study is based on an historical analysis of four
states, selected to vary on key attributes of race, ethnicity, and nativity
as well as in organizational and state resources.
The research will advance our knowledge of how individuals, although
disadvantaged because of their position in the community, may be able to
have political influence when they become part of organizations. It moves
beyond the usual perspective of educational sociology with an expanded
theory on the role of organizations in providing resources, shaping demands,
and expressing group interests. Through attention to historical detail, it
will spell out the processes of change and illuminate the ways in which
institutions are built.
The Impact of Unions on Wages and Unemployment
Award number: 9511473
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $90,740
Investigator: Bruce Western
Sponsor: Princeton University
This is a study of the labor market impact resulting from declining levels
of unionization in 18 OECD countries between 1973-1990. Although trade union
decline in membership has been carefully recorded, the effects of that
decline have not been analyzed previously in the ways proposed here. The
research argues that labor market trends are the result of political
struggles among workers, employers, and their representatives. It tests
hypotheses about the effects of centralized bargaining, the electoral
failure of social democratic parties, increased inequality in the work
force, and rival economic theories about the oil price shock and the growth
of world trade. The mutual dependence of union membership and unemployment
is examined using statistical techniques developed by the researcher.
Because of the possibility of strong sectoral trends in earnings and
employment , the research is supplemented with comparative case studies of
Britain, Germany, and the United States, where there are existing data to
examine export and sheltered sectors of the national economies.
The research will offer new sociological and institutional explanations of
important processes of social capital formation that will supplement, if not
challenge, existing economic explanations. Through its focus on the
struggles by workers and employers to affect economic outcomes, it links
stratification research with political sociology and presents the
possibility of an enlarged conception of economic sociology.
Power-at-a-Distance and Power Reversals: Testing New Predictions for
Exchange Networks
Award number: 9423231
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $241,347
Investigator: David E. Willer
Sponsor: University of South Carolina
This is a study of power in social exchange networks that will test two
extensions of Network Exchange Theory (NET) through laboratory
experimentation. In the first extension, NET offers predictions for
power-at-a-distance, where unlike previous studies power exercise is not
limited to immediately adjacent positions, but reaches outward two or three
network steps. In the second extension, NET predicts that coalitions which
eliminate power under some network conditions will bring power reversals
under other conditions. In the research, a system of linked microcomputers
called ExNet connects human subjects in experimental networks allowing
communications and facilitating resource transactions. The existing versions
of ExNet would not permit the intended experiments, so software will be
written to add these and other capabilities to ExNet, and the system will be
made available to the community of laboratory exchange researchers to
facilitate experiments of many kinds.
This work is an important step in linking laboratory experimentation on
social exchange with phenomena in the real world, most notably because it
increases the size and complexity of social network processes that can be
studied. These experiments are fundamental research on social-capital
aspects of human capital theory, exploring the ways that structural location
in a social network can be a vital resource conferring power and thus
resources, quite independently of the individual characteristics of the
person occupying that location. An extension of one of the most promising
lines of work in social-psychological research on group processes, this
project will contribute fundamental insights on how the structural
properties of social exchange networks influence the fates of human beings.
Doctoral Dissertation Awards:
In addition to the scientific gains to be achieved by the research, each
award will materially assist a highly promising student in completing
research for the Ph.D. dissertation. Thus it contributes to the thorough
training of the next generation of social scientists.
Career and Family Patterns among Female Executives in Finance-Related
Occupations
Award number: 9521237
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $4,500
Investigators: Andrew Abbott and Mary Blair-Loy
Sponsor: University of Chicago
This research will study career and family patterns of female executives in
finance-related fields. Existing theories explaining why women make up a
small proportion of higher management are reconsidered through an approach
that takes into account the combination of events that make up turning
points in women's lives. These turning points either sustain women in a
career trajectory or redirect them in other directions. Detailed interviews
from 58 senior female executives and 23 women who began promising careers in
the same field but did not continue at the same pace or left entirely will
be analyzed using optimal matching techniques, a form of sequence analysis.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of the
interrelations among work, family, and gender equality. Innovative methods
of analysis will be refined so that they can be of use to social scientists
studying career mobility. Findings will also be helpful to policy-makers
concerned with ways to increase equality in the work place and to strengthen
family relations.
Higher Education and Work Histories: Educational Attachment and the Labor
Force Attachment of Married Japanese Women
Award number: 9521033
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $2,400
Investigators: Joan Aldous and Keiko Hirao
Sponsor: University of Notre Dame
This study compares the factors that determine whether Japanese women will
stay in or leave the labor force after marriage, with particular attention
to the role of education. It tests the applicability of human capital theory
in the Japanese context and provides new comparisons with the United States.
The study will be based on a newly-collected survey of 2,000 women in
central Japan, with respondents selected to reflect different educational
experiences.
This study will contribute to the sociological understanding of the relation
between women's human capital and the continuity of social stratification.
It will also add to our understanding of Japanese society generally and the
ways it compares with the United States. Policy makers should find useful
information about the conflicts between work and family
Careers in Science
Award number: 9501420
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Charles E. Bidwell and Joseph Hermanowicz
Sponsor: University of Chicago
This study will examine self-conceptions of work and achievement among
academic physicists. Subjects are selected to vary by stage of career and by
the type of university in which they are employed. Theoretical issues
include how work setting shapes personal identity. Data come from 60
subjects, each of whom will supply information by participating in a lengthy
interview, completing a questionnaire, and supplying a curriculum vitae.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of careers,
academic professions, and academic and scientific institutions.
Chinese Scientific Elite -- A Chinese Test of the Universalism of
Scientific Elite Formation
Award number: 9521358
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,425
Investigators: Jonathan R. Cole and Cong Cao
Sponsor: Columbia University
The research examines the factors that contribute to the formation of the
Chinese scientific elite. The study uses a comparative perspective for
assessing applicability to the Chinese context of theories about Western
scientific knowledge. A variety of data are used, including biographies,
mail surveys, interviews with scientists, and documentary and archival
sources.
This research will contribute to the sociological understanding of science,
Chinese society, and comparative science policies.
Competing Definitions of Artistic, Literary and Social Value
Award number: 9520929
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Paul DiMaggio and Bethany P. Bryson
Sponsor: Princeton University
The research examines how artistic and literary excellence are defined and
how the subsequent criteria are applied. The research settings are two art
museums and two university literature departments, selected to contrast
cultural organizations where multiculturalism is the focus from those with
more traditional orientations. Theoretical concerns relate to the formation
of cognitive systems and their relation to social action. Data come from
careful observations and from 90 interviews with museum curators and
literature professors.
This research will contribute to the sociological understanding of cultural
systems by examining the relation between aesthetic standards and standards
used in other social situations.
The Impact of the Equal Opportunity Movement on the Labor-force
Experiences of Women and Blacks, 1960-1990
Award number: 9521292
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Neil Fligstein and Iona Mara-Drita
Sponsor: University of Cal Berkeley
The study will link theories of employment discrimination based on economic
outcomes with those based on institutional processes to present a more
comprehensive picture of the direct and indirect effects of laws on changing
patterns of employment discrimination. Analysis is based on civil cases of
employment discrimination by states using existing and recoded data, newly
assembled data from histories of state employment discrimination policies,
and measures of employment inequality using census data. The time covered is
from 1960 to 1990.
This study will contribute to sociological understanding of the variable
affects of anti-discrimination laws on the work experiences of women and
blacks and add to theory and research in the sociology of law, social
movements, and social stratification. The findings will be of use to
policy-makers concerned with the use of legal means to remedy discriminatory
practices.
Co-management and Conservation in the Philippines: Community-State
Differentiation, Conflict and Cooperation
Award number: 9412673
NSF program director: William Bainbridge
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Louise Fortmann and Melanie McDermott
Sponsor: University of California, Berkeley
This study will undertake a critical examination of co-management processes
as they are unfolding in three indigenous forest communities in the
Philippines. It seeks to understand the conditions under which co-management
arrangements lead to outcomes characterized by biological sustainability,
social equity, and self-determination for communities. Theoretical issues
include how stratification and power affect resource management practices.
The principal research methods are resource appraisal, censuses,
semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and secondary data
analysis.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of community
differentiation, resource partitioning, common property management,
state-locality interactions and the conditions for cooperation or conflict.
It will also improve the knowledge base for policy decisions concerning
resource management and the environment.
Ethnic Organization and Political Cultures: Italians and Jews in
Argentina and Venezuela
Award number: 9521235
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Calvin Goldscheider and Nelly Lejter
Sponsor: Brown University
This study compares the formation and changes in roles and activities of
ethnic organizations serving Jews and Italians in Argentina and Venezuela.
It draws on theories of immigrant and ethnic integration and tests their
applicability to Latin America. Data are based on existing records from 1940
to the 1990s obtained from newspapers, ethnic organizations, and ethnic
schools.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of how immigrant
ethnic groups form communities that foster (or impede) their integration
into host societies. It will also add generally to understanding Latin
American societies and how they compare to the United States.
The Impact of the Welfare State on Patterns of Occupational Sex
Segregation in Four Countries
Award number: 9501687
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $6,463
Investigators: David B. Grusky and Mariko L. Chang
Sponsor: Stanford University
This study examines the intersection among state policies, type of economy,
and the family in affecting occupational sex segregation. Theoretical issues
relate to gender stratification and the effects of institutional
arrangments. Data are from national censuses between 1960 and 1990 in the
United States, Sweden, Japan, and Hungary. The four countries have been
selected because they are expected to display four distinct patterns of sex
segregation.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of how state
policies affect the segregation of occupations according to the sex of
workers as well as the ways in which women deal with competing obligations
from work and family. The results should be useful to policy makers
concerned with equal opportunity for women and support for the family.
Pathways to Mobility within Internal Labor Markets
Award number: 9521320
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $5,505
Investigators: David B. Grusky and Manuela Romero
Sponsor: Stanford University
This study will examine the pathways to promotion within a single, large
multi-level firm with data from job histories of employees hired between
1975 and 1985. It seeks to answer the question of why individuals who begin
with what look like the same career chances often end up in different
positions. This question is both of practical significance and is rooted in
the theoretical literature on organizations. Analysis of career data will
test statistical models of multiple career trajectories as these apply
within firms.
This research contributes to sociological understanding of career mobility
and the barriers to equality of advancement that may develop within firms.
Social Networks and Economic Activity in Two Low Income
Communities
Award number: 9501509
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Martin S. Jankowski and Daniel Dohan
Sponsor: University of California, Berkeley
This study will examine how two low income Mexican-American communities use
social networks to deal with day to day economic issues. Theoretical issues
focus on how social capital that is manifested through social networks
facilitate or constrain economic participation. Fieldwork has been completed
in the first community, made up of Mexican migrants living in San Jose.
Funding is requested for establishing residence from which to conduct
participant observation of a second community, made up of Chicanos in Los
Angeles.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of poverty and
urban life, immigrant communities, and the economy and it will provide
policy makers with information about the ways to promote economic resources
in poor communities.
Welfare Recipients and the Job Matching Process
Award number: 9501488
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Christopher Jencks and Judith A. Levine
Sponsor: Northwestern University
This study will examine the conditions under which welfare recipients are
able to make the transition into the job market. Theories examined include
those relating to human capital, network links, and individual attitudes
about the self. A carefully selected sample of 50 AFDC recipients will be
interviewed to learn which characteristics are most likely to lead to
successful job transitions. Additional information will be obtained from
interviews with potential employers.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of urban
poverty, welfare policies, and the pathways to employment. The focus of this
research on welfare and the transition to work makes it valuable for policy
makers concerned with encouraging employment.
Legitimacy and Compliance in Bargaining Negotiations
Award number: 9500937
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $4,145
Investigators: Michael J. Lovaglia and Mouraine R. Baker
Sponsor: University of Iowa
This study will test the effect of legitimacy in encouraging compliance
based on three possible ways legitimacy may be acquired by those wielding
power. Theoretical issues relate to legitimacy, power, and decision making.
Data come from a series of laboratory experiments.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of power,
authority, and influence processes.
The Social Organization of the Rural Homeless
Award number: 9521006
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Eric M. Margolis and Peggy Southard
Sponsor: University of Oregon
The research examines the social organization of homeless people who camp on
publicly-owned lands. It tests prior theories about the homeless, comparing
older theories about social disaffiliation with newer ones on the culture of
resistance. The study builds on the co-investigator's four years of previous
research and observations on this population by using ethnographic methods
of data collection. New data will come from 120 days of observations and 60
intensive interviews.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of the lives of
homeless rural residents. It adds to a tradition that looks for insights
into how social organizations are formed and operate by examining those who
live unconventional lifestyles. Findings may also be of help to
policy-makers, concerned with programs for reducing homelessness.
The Social Composition of Occupations
Award number: 9501009
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $3,563
Investigators: J. Miller McPherson and Thomas Rotolo
Sponsor: University of Arizona
This study uses a model based on an ecological theory of competition. Niche
overlap--shared sociodemographic characteristics among occupations--is
expected to create competitive pressures that lead to changes in an
occupation's basic niche. The model is tested using data from the Current
Population Survey Annual Demographic Files.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of why
occupations vary in composition according to age, gender, race, and similar
characteristics and why occupations change their compositon over time. This
information should be of help to policy makers concerned with efforts to
encourage occupational diversity.
Social Exchange and Attributions
Award number: 9503285
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $2,400
Investigators: Linda D. Molm and Phillip A. Wiseley
Sponsor: University of Arizona
The study will examine the relations between attributions about exchange
partners and behavior in exchange relations. It ties together attribution
theory with social exchange theory in new and previously unexamined ways.
The research uses existing experimental data to test the effects of
structure and behavior on attributions and designs a fresh experiment to
test the effects of attributions on exchange behavior.
This research contributes to the sociological understanding of social
psychology by linking the subfields of cognition, concerned with how people
develop beliefs about behavior, with social exchange, concerned with how
people use resources to obtain the behavioral outcomes they desire.
A Cross-National Comparison of Recent Primary Health Care Utilization
Trends in Latin America
Award number: 9521327
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,100
Investigators: Alberto Palloni and Michael J. McQuestion
Sponsor: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Unlike Europe, where the demographic transition went along with rapid
industrialization, demographic shifts in Latin America appear as the result
of public health care programs. Yet there is considerable variation among
population groups in their use of primary health care programs and this
study will examine the factors affecting these differences. The study tests
demographic theories and social epidemiological theories of health and
disease. Three Latin American countries will be compared using existing data
sources, primarily from demographic and health surveys.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of population
changes and the social factors affecting the adoption of public health
measures at the household level. Findings will be of use to policy-makers
concerned with improving public health among households at high risk for
disease and early mortality.
Continuity and Change in the Environmental Movement
Award number: 9502365
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $6,017
Investigators: Harry R. Potter and Jill D. Stephens
Sponsor: Purdue University
This study is concerned with the environmental movement's bases of action,
composition, and organizational character. It appraises competing theories
of social movements--grievance-based, resource mobilization, and
identity-based. The research is based on face to face interviews and a
mailed survey, and survey results will be compared to a similar study
conducted in 1979.
The research will contribute to sociological understanding of social
movements and to the factors leading to continuity and change in the
environmental movement. It will be useful to formulating policies designed
to encourage citizen participation in efforts to protect the environment..
A Comparative Study Of Old-Age Pensions
Award number: 9502113
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,498
Investigators: Charles Ragin and Brian K. Gran
Sponsor: Northwestern University
This is a study of the factors contributing to the incidence and prominence
of private pensions as well as the relation between private and public
pensions. Theoretical issues deal with the role of old age pensions in the
growth and transformation of the welfare state. Countries compared are
Belgium, Canada, Denmark, the United States, and New Zealand. Analysis is
based on systematic qualitiative comparisons, case studies, and quantitative
cross-sectional data from 1960 to 1990.
This research will contribute to the sociological understanding of the
origins and effects of pension policies and the changing nature of the
welfare state. By examining alternative policies adopted by different states
and the implications that follow from these, the findings should be useful
to policy makers concerned about the growth of pension entitlements.
Determinants and Consequences of Contingent Work
Award number: 9501933
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,500
Investigators: Barbara F. Reskin and Naomi R. Cassirer
Sponsor: Ohio State University
The research deals with the growing phenomenon of contingent work of four
kinds: part-time, temporary, out-sourced, and independent contract. It
relates to theories of employment and labor force inequality. A number of
existing data sources will be used to compile a comprehensive data set for
analyzing the determinants of contingent work and its effects on inequality.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of social
stratification, work, and economic sociology. It will be of help to policy
makers concerned with labor force inequality and employment policies.
Planning for Retirement
Award number: 9505719
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $6,224
Investigators: Michael Schwartz and Megan Scott
Sponsor: State University of New York, Stony Brook
This is a study of saving and retirement planning among working and middle
class couples, particularly through the influence of gender and inequality.
Theoretical issues concern the influence of education, gender, and social
class on decision-making in the family. Data include interviews with 20
retired couples, interviewed together and separately, and survey data from
the National Longitudinal Survey (concentrating on the "older men" cohort
and their "mature" spouses) and from the Health and Retirement Study.
This research will contribute to sociological understanding of family
relations, financial planning, and social class differences. It will be of
help to policy makers concerned with family stability and the economic
well-being of the elderly.
Assets, Family andAchievement among Blacks and Whites
Award number: 9521011
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $5,550
Investigators: Seymour Spilerman and Dalton Conley
Sponsor: Columbia University
This study will look at a previously unstudied aspect of black-white
differences by examining the contributions of total family wealth or assets
to children's educational attainment and the subsequent contributions of
children's wealth on the likelihood of forming stable families. It builds on
theories of social stratification and uses data from the Panel Study of
Income Dynamics to statistically model the effects of wealth.
This study will contribute to sociological understanding of differences
between blacks and whites in family formation and stability and in
educational attainment. Its focus on the effects of family assets will also
be of use to policy makers concerned with stabilizing the family and
equalizing opportunity for children.
The Politics of Inclusion: Patterns of Contention in the American South,
1954-65
Award number: 9521536
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $5,142
Investigators: Charles Tilly and Joseph Luders
Sponsor: New School for Social Researsch
This is a study of how economic development and competition for resources
affected the reactions to civil rights protests in the American South. The
study draws together theories of economic development and competition into a
comprehensive explanatory model. It combines county-level event data from
1954 to 1965 with data from government sources and selected case studies
based on local-level sources.
This study will add to our sociological understanding of how economic
factors affect community reactions to collective protest. More generally, it
will contribute to understanding the dynamics of protest and of resistance
to change.
The Marketplace for Achievement for Young Women
Award number: 9505164
NSF program director: Mildred A. Schwartz
Expected total amount: $7,489
Investigators: Wayne J. Villemez and Lajuana S. Williams
Sponsor: University of Connecticut
This is a study of the work aspirations of young women as they are affected
by their local area of residence. The research ties together theories about
gender and work aspirations with broader issues dealing with the effects
from opportunity structures and from cultural and political milieus.
National data about aspirations are available from the National Longitudinal
Survey of Youth and information about place will come from a variety of
existing sources. More focused data will follow from intensive interviews
with 26 adolescents, gathered over three years, from two high schools in
Connecticut. Information on place to supplement those interviews will be
provided by a survey of the high schools along with additional data about
the communities.
This research will contribute to the sociological understanding of gender
roles, work aspirations, and local labor markets. By taking into account how
the local labor market is simultaneously an opportunity structure and a
cultural and political setting in which aspirations are shaped and
constrained, it will be of use to policy makers concerned with broadening
opportunities for women in the work world.
Research Training Site:
Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Site in Sociology
Award number: 9424006
NSF program director: Bonney Sheahan
Expected total amount: $51,990
Investigator: Ivan D. Chase
Sponsor: State University of New York, Stony Brook
This award provides funds for a Research Experiences for Undergraduates Site
in Sociology through SUNY, Stony Brook. The award provides the opportunity
for ten undergraduate students to be immersed into an active research
environment spanning the areas of social organizations across species,
stratification, demography, gender studies, homelessness, the sociology of
warfare, and intensive qualitative analysis. The students will work as
apprentices under the close supervision of faculty mentors and experienced
graduate students. The goal is to introduce students to research utilizing
the most current theoretical models and the latest, state-of-the-art
equipment and methodological techniques. In addition to the research
experience, participants will receive academic counseling and have access to
a variety of support services. This award contributes to the Foundation's
continuing efforts to attract talented students into careers in science
through active undergraduate research experiences.