Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC Home Search CDC CDC Health Topics A-Z    
Office of Genomics and Disease Prevention  
Office of Genomics and Disease Prevention
e-Journal Club
CYP19, CYP1A1 Polymorphisms and ER-positive Breast Cancer

April 13, 2004

Abstraction Template
     
Key variables & Description Article

Reference
Complete the bibliographic reference for the article according to AJE format.

 

Miyoshi Y, et al. Association of genetic polymorphisms in CYP19 and CYP1A1 with the oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer risk. European Journal of Cancer. 2003 March;39(17):2531-2537.

 

Category of HuGE information
Specify the types of information (from the list below) available in the article:

  1. Prevalence of gene variant
  2. Gene-disease association
  3. Gene-environment interaction
  4. Gene-gene interaction
  5. Genetic test evaluation/monitoring

 

1. Prevalence of gene variant
2. Gene-disease association
4. Gene-gene interaction

Study hypotheses or purpose
The authors study hypotheses or main purpose for conducting the study.

 

Investigation of the association of CYP19 and CYP1A1 with ER-positive vs. ER-negative breast cancers in order to evaluate their usefulness in assessing risk in candidates for chemoprevention with tamoxifen.

Gene(s)
Identification of the following:

  1. Gene name
  2. Chromosome location
  3. Gene product/function
  4. Alleles
  5. OMIM #

 

  1. Gene name: CYP19
  2. Chromosome location: 15q21.1
  3. Gene product/function: encodes P450 aromatase, which catalyzes the biosynthesis of estrogen
  4. Alleles: TTTA repeats, specifically TTTA 7(-3bp) allele (7 repeats with additional 3bp deletion)
  5. OMIM #: 107910
  1. Gene name: CYP1A1
  2. Chromosome location: 15q22-q24
  3. Gene product/function: encodes cytochrome P450, which catalyzes the hydroxylation of estrogen
  4. Alleles: 6235 T-->C
  5. OMIM #: 108330

 

Environmental factor(s)
Identification of the major environmental factors studied (infectious, chemical, physical, nutritional, and behavioral)

 

N/A

Health outcome(s)
Identification of the major health outcome(s) studied

 

1. Estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer
2. Estrogen receptor- negative breast cancer

Study design
Specification of the type of study design(s)
  1. Case-control
  2. Cohort 
  3. Cross-sectional
  4. Descriptive or case series
  5. Clinical trial
  6. Population screening

 

1. Case-control
Case definition
For study designs 1, 4, and 5, define the following if available:
  1. Disease case definition
  2. Exclusion criteria
  3. Gender
  4. Race/ethnicity
  5. Age
  6. Time period
  7. Geographic location
  8. Number of participants

 

  1. Disease case definition: Women living in Osaka, Japan with histologically confirmed breast cancer that had been treated with mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery
  2. Exclusion criteria: not specified
  3. Gender: Women
  4. Race/ethnicity: Japanese
  5. Age: 27 - 78 years (Mean: 51.3 years)
  6. Time period: February 1998 - March 2001
  7. Geographic location: Osaka , Japan
  8. Number of participants: 257

 

 

Control definition
For study design 1, define the following if available:
  1. Control selection criteria
  2. Matching variables
  3. Exclusion criteria
  4. Gender
  5. Race/ethnicity
  6. Age
  7. Time period
  8. Geographic location
  9. Number of participants

 

  1. Control selection criteria: Attendees of a breast cancer screening program in Osaka , Japan
  2. Matching variables: None
  3. Exclusion criteria: none
  4. Gender: Female
  5. Race/ethnicity: Japanese
  6. Age: 23 - 69 years (Mean: 49.7 years)
  7. Time period: April 2001 - March 2002
  8. Geographic location: Osaka , Japan
  9. Number of participants: 191

 

 

Assessment of environment factors
For studies that include gene-environment interactions, define the following, if available:
  1. Environmental factor
  2. Exposure assessment
  3. Exposure definition
  4. Number of participants with exposure data (% of total eligible)

 

N/A

 

Genotyping
Specify the following:
  1. Gene
  2. DNA source
  3. Methodology
  4. Number of participants genotyped (% of total eligible) 
  1. Gene: CYP19
  2. DNA source: blood mono-nucleated cells
  3. Methodology: Polymorphisms were amplified using PCR and sized by electrophoresis.
  4. Number of participants genotyped: 448 (100% of total eligible)
  1. Gene: CYP1A1
  2. DNA source: blood mono-nucleated cells
  3. Methodology: Polymorphisms were amplified using PCR and sized by electrophoresis.
  4. Number of participants genotyped: 448 (100% of total eligible)
Results
Describe the major results under each of the following HuGE categories. Include tables when data are provided:
  1. Prevalence of gene variant
  2. Gene-disease association
  3. Gene-environment interaction
  4. Gene-gene interaction
  5. Genetic test evaluation/monitoring


1. Prevalence of gene variant
Note: Though allele frequency data were presented for 8 different tetranucleotide (TTTA) repeat polymorphisms, CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp) was selected for further analysis.

Prevalence of CYP19 and CYP1A1 polymorphisms in cases and controls.

 

Cases
N=257
# (%)

Control
N=191
# (%)

CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp)

Carrier

121 (47.1)

74 (38.7)

Non-carrier

136 (52.9)

117 (61.3)

CYP1A1 6235C

Carrier

137 (53.3) 117 (61.3)

Non-carrier

120 (46.7) 74 (38.7)

2. Gene-disease association
Association of polymorphisms with ER-positive breast cancer

 

Cases
N=156
# (%)

Control
N=191
# (%)

OR
(95%CI)*

CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp)

Carrier

79 (50.6)

74 (38.7)

1.72
(1.10-2.69)

Non-carrier

77 (49.4)

117 (61.3)

1.00

CYP1A1 6235C

Carrier

79 (50.6)
117 (61.3)
0.65
(0.42-1.02)

Non-carrier

77 (49.4)
74 (38.7)
1.00

* Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) adjusted for age, family history, parity and body mass index.

 

 

Cases
N=88
# (%)

Control
N=191
# (%)

OR
(95%CI)*

CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp)

Carrier

35 (39.8)

74 (38.7)

1.11
(0.65-1.90)

Non-carrier

53 (60.2)

117 (61.3)

1.00

CYP1A1 6235C

Carrier

51 (58.0)
117 (61.3)
0.88
(0.51-1.90)

Non-carrier

37 (42.0)
74 (38.7)
1.00

* Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) adjusted for age, family history, parity and body mass index.

No. of high risk genotypes*

Cases†
N=156
# (%)

Control
N=191
# (%)

OR
(95%CI)^

 All women

0

46 (29%)

67 (35%)

1.00

1

64 (41%)

100 (52%)

0.89
(0.53-1.48)

2

46 (29%)

24 (13%)

3.00
(1.56-5.74)

 Pre-menopausal

0

29 (32%)
34 (37%)

1.00

1

37 (40%)
46 (51%)

0.87
(0.43-1.77)

2

26 (28%)
11 (12%)

2.29
(0.92-5.68)

 Postmenopausal

0

17 (27%)
33 (33%)

1.00

1

27 (42%)
54 (54%)

1.06
(0.47-2.38)

2

20 (31%)
13 (13%)

5.37
(1.74-16.63)

*High-risk genotypes are (TTTA) 7(-3bp) carriers for CYP19 and 6235C non-
carriers for CYP1A1 .0=neither polymorphism, 1=either CYP19 (TTTA) (TTTA) 7(-3bp) or absence of CYP1A1 6235 C, and 2=at least one copy of each of these "high-risk alleles"
†Cases are women diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancer.
^Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) adjusted for age, family history, parity and body mass index.

 

Conclusion
State the author's overall conclusions from the study

CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp) carriers had increased risk for ER-positive, but not
ER-negative breast cancer.  CYP1A1 6235C alone appeared to be inversely associated with ER-positive breast cancer, but the result was not statistically significant. However, the combination of the two high-risk genotypes ( CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp) and absence of CYP1A1 6235C) was the
greatest predictor of ER-positive breast cancer. The authors state that this information would be useful in the selection of candidates for chemoprevention with tamoxifen.

Neither CYP19 nor CYP1A1 polymorphisms, individually or combined, were significantly associated with elevated serum estrogen levels in the post-menopausal controls.

 

Comments
Provide additional insight, including methodologic issues and/or concerns about the study
  • Controls were chosen from women who attended a breast cancer screening function. Their attendance may suggest an inherent belief of increased risk due to factors such as family history. Family history was, however, controlled for in the analysis.
  • Previous studies in Caucasian women have shown associations between other CYP19 TTTA repeats and increased breast cancer risk . However, in this study, the only allele associated with breast cancer was CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp).
  • Smoking was not controlled for or examined for interaction with the polymorphisms. CYP1A1 is believed to be induced by and act on carcinogens found in tobacco smoke (1).
  • The population attributable fraction (AF) for the presence of the high risk CYP19 variant was 22%. The AF for the presence of both high-risk genotypes with ER+ breast cancer is 20.1% in all women, 10.0% in premenopausal women, and 36.2% in post-menopausal women. It is important to note that the finding for post-menopausal women was based on only 20 cases and 13 controls. In fact, in the analysis that stratified on number of high-risk alleles and menopausal status, none of the odds ratios were statistically significant. Though this information may not be relevant to the general population, it does appear that it may be a significant source of information for women debating the use of tamoxifen.
  • Currently, this prophylaxis is recommended only for high-risk women. Therefore, the prediction of ER-positive breast cancer is relevant to chemoprophylaxis only in a high-risk population. No results are presented stratified on family history. The predictive value of CYP19 (TTTA) 7(-3bp) or CYP1A1 6235C) in a high-risk
    population could be different.

References

  1. Dunning A, et al. A systematic review of genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk.
    Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 1999 Oct;8(10):843-54.

Last Updated August 25, 2004