Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention		 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC Home Search CDC CDC Health Topics A-Z    
Office of Genomics and Disease Prevention  
Office of Genomics and Disease Prevention
 
chromosome fact sheet
Androgen Receptor Gene and Prostate Cancer
 Rovshan Ismailov, MD, MPH
University of Pittsburgh

                                                                          Published May, 2002
 
chromosome   AR Gene The androgen receptor (AR) gene is located in the Xq11.2–q12 chromosome and consists of eight exons. This gene is a member of the steroid/nuclear receptor gene superfamily. There are two domains that are directly responsible for the transactivation activity of the AR protein. Of these domains, the ligand-independent AF-1 is encoded within exon 1.
chromosome
 
 

Prevalence of Gene Variants

 There are three known AR gene polymorphisms: the (CAG)n trinucleotide repeat, the (GGC)n trinucleotide repeat, and the R726L single nucleotide polymorphism (1).  Studies have suggested that twenty-seven alleles ranging from 5 to 31 repeats were observed in various populations.  Short CAG repeats (less than or equal to 22 repeats) were found to be more prevalent in African-American males who are at high risk for prostate cancer and less prevalent in Asians who are at lower risk for this disease (2). This observation reveals that variation in androgen receptor CAG repeat length differs considerably among human populations. African Americans have the lowest frequency (20%) of the GGC allele with 16 repeats; the comparable values for intermediate-risk whites were 57% and low-risk Asians were 70% (2). 
Disease Burden In recent years, prostate cancer has become the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the United States. There is a 65-fold difference in incidence of prostate cancer between the populations with the highest (African-American) and lowest (Asian) risk (3). Compared with rates of prostate cancer in the United States, rates are slightly lower in some countries of Western Europe such as Denmark, United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain. In Asia, prostate cancer rates in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Bombay are less than half of those in Israel (4).

Consistent with the interracial variation in CAG and GGC distributions, there was an excess among white patients with fewer than 22 CAG and not-16 GGC repeats relative to white controls (relative risk, 2.1; one-sided P = 0.08) (2). No linkage disequilibrium was observed between the two numbers of CAG and GGC repeats among unaffected subjects.  However, there was a statistically significant negative association between the numbers of CAG and GGC repeats among the prostate cancer patients studied (two-sided P = 0.008). The (CAG)n repeat was found to play a role in predisposition to prostate cancer.  In one of the case-control studies conducted in Australia, the odds ratio of prostate carcinoma for a change of 5 CAG repeats was 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.15); therefore, investigators concluded that the AR CAG repeat polymorphism was not a risk factor for prostate carcinoma. However, in this study, a shorter repeat sequence was found to be associated with earlier age at diagnosis (5).

In another study conducted in China, Chinese men have been found to have  longer CAG (equal or longer than 23) repeats compared with western men. Another finding of this study suggests that even in a very low-risk population, a shorter CAG repeat length confers a higher risk of clinically significant prostate cancer.  Chinese men with a CAG repeat length shorter than 23 (median length) had a 65% increased risk of prostate cancer (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.39) (6).  Finally, according to the study by Miller et al., the (CAG)n and (GGN)n repeats do not play a major role in familial prostate cancer (7).
Interactions

Studies show a two-fold increase in relative risk for combination of CAG and GGN short repeats (less or equal to 22). The AR, by transactivating some genes, might influence prostate cancer risk through several pathways. Other genes can directly or indirectly activate the AR, augmenting prostate cancer risk.   For instance, HSD17B3, the gene that encodes 17 b -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type III, the testicular 17-ketoreductase, favors the reduction of androstenedione to testosterone in the testis and can indirectly (through dihydrotestosterone) activate AR.

In the study by Xue et al. (8), men who carry a short AR CAG (less or equal to 22) allele and who also carry two copies of the PSA G allele, had a nearly 3-fold increase in risk of advanced prostate cancer; however, the limitation of this study was a small sample size, and results need to be replicated before they can be considered conclusive.

The study by Yeh et al. (9) suggests that the BRCA1 may function as an AR coregulator and play positive roles in androgen-induced cell death in prostate cancer cells and other androgen/AR target organs. BRCA1 has been identified by linkage studies with a familial history of prostate cancer in addition to breast and ovarian cancer. Struewing et al. reported a risk of prostate cancer of up to 25% by the age of 70 years for carriers of any of the two BRCA1 mutations, whereas the risk was only 5% for carriers of the BRCA2 mutation and 3.8% for those who were not carriers (10).

There is strong evidence that environmental factors can influence the risk of prostate cancer: The wide variation in disease incidence observed worldwide, the observation that prostate cancer rates among immigrants tend to approach those of the host country, and results from studies such as the Physicians' Health Study that showed that men who consumed at least two and a half servings of dairy foods daily were about 30% more likely to develop prostate cancer than men who consume only half a serving per day. No studies have examined the interaction between specific environmental risk factors for prostate cancer and the AR gene.

Larger studies are needed to evaluate the combined effect of CAG and GGN repeats. Because gene-gene and gene-environment interactions may potentially contribute to prostate cancer risk, it would be desirable to conduct studies in which both biomarkers (or other measures) of exposure and polymorphism of multiple genes are examined.

Laboratory Tests
CAG and GGC genotypes were assayed by separating radioactively labeled polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products on polyacrylamide gels. In addition, automated sequencing systems have been used to assay these polymorphisms.
 
Population Testing No laboratory tests are available to the general public for AR gene diagnostic purposes.
 
References

  1. Mononen N, Syrjakoski K, Matikainen M, Tammela TL, Schleutker J, Kallioniemi OP, Trapman J, Koivisto PA. Two percent of Finnish prostate cancer patients have a germ-line mutation in the hormone-binding domain of the androgen receptor gene. Cancer Res 2000;60(22):6479-81.

  2. Irvine RA, Yu MC, Ross RK: The CAG and GGC microsatellites of the androgen receptor gene are in linkage disequilibrium in men with prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1995; 55(9):1937-40.

  3. Stanford JL, Stephenson RA, Coyle LM, Cerhan J, Correa R, Eley JW, Gilliland F, Hankey B, Kolonel LN, Kosary C, Ross R, Severson R, West D. Prostate Cancer Trends 1973-1995, SEER Program, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 99-4543. Bethesda, MD, 1999.

  4. Hsing AW, Tsao L, Devesa SS. International trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int J Cancer 2000; 85:60-7.

  5. Beilin J, Harewood L, Frydenberg M, et al. A case-control study of the androgen receptor gene CAG repeat polymorphism in Australian prostate carcinoma subjects. Cancer 2001; 92(4):941-949.   

  6. Hsing AW, Gao YT, Wu G, Wang X, Deng J, Chen YL, Sesterhenn IA, Mostofi FK, Benichou J, Chang C. Polymorphic CAG and GGN repeat lengths in the androgen receptor gene and prostate cancer risk: a population-based case-control study in China. Cancer Res 2000;60(18):5111-6.

  7. Miller EA, Stanford JL, Hsu L, Noonan E, Ostrander EA. Polymorphic repeats in the androgen receptor gene in high-risk sibships. Prostate 2001; 48(3): 200-5.

  8. Xue W, Irvine AR, Yu CM., Ross R., Coetzee GA, Ingles SA.  Susceptibility to prostate cancer: interaction between genotypes at the androgen receptor and prostate-specific antigen loci. Cancer Res 2000;60, 839-41.  

  9. Yeh S, Hu YC, Rahman M, Lin HK, Hsu CL, Ting HJ, Kang HY, Chang C. Increase of androgen-induced cell death and androgen receptor transactivation by BRCA1 in prostate cancer cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97(21):11256-61, 2000 Oct 10.  

  10. Struewing J, Hartge P, Wacholder S, et al. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1401-8.
Web sites

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

National Cancer Institute- Prostate Cancer Home Page

National Cancer Institute- Planning for Prostate Cancer Research

National Cancer Institute - The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program

British Columbia Cancer Research Center

The National Cancer Institute of Canada

American Cancer Society

HuGENet™ Review
  Androgen Receptor (AR) CAG Repeats and Prostate Cancer

 

  chromosome
Last Updated January 13, 2004