Farmers combine land, water, commercial
inputs, labor, and their management skills into practices and systems
to produce food and fiber. To sustain production over time, farmers
must make a profit and preserve their resource and financial assets.
Society wants food and fiber products that are low-cost, safe to consume,
and aesthetically pleasing, and wants production systems that preserve
or enhance the environment. These often competing goals and pressures
are reflected not only in the inputs made available for production,
but also in how the inputs are selected, combined, and managed at
the farm level. Increasingly, farmers are facing pressures to change
from conventional production practices to more environmentally friendly
practices. ERS research examines the critical role of economic and
environmental factors in the adoption of management practices and
technologies, including the use of conservation tillage, integrated
pest management practices, precision farming, nutrient testing, organic
farming, and biotechnology.
This research program evaluates agricultural
technologies and practices and their contributions to sustainable
agricultural production systems. What factors influence the decisions
of farmers to use environmentally preferred pest, nutrient, and
soil management practices, what are the environmental and economic
effects of these decisions, and how can government policies influence
those decisions and consequences? Modeling the adoption of individual
technologies and systems of practices draws heavily from the annual
Agricultural Resource Management Surveys (ARMS) and the Vegetable
and Fruit Chemical Use Surveys.
Research is organized in three programs to develop information
on pest management, soil management, and nutrient management.
Each program includes consideration of how individual management
practices and technologies fit with the production system, and how
they contribute to sustainability.
Pest management
Farmers rely heavily upon pesticides to combat the significant
yield and quality losses to crops caused by insects, disease, and
weeds. However, biological and cultural methods, genetically engineered
crops, and biological products such as Bacillus thuringiensis
are increasingly used to control pests. This project examines the
economics of alternative pest control methods and how policiessuch
as the USDA/EPA implementation of the Food Quality Protection Act
(FQPA) and the methyl bromide phaseout provisions of the Clean Air
Actaffect farmers' pest management choices. Survey data will
show the extent of chemical and nonchemical pest management practices
on major field crops and selected fruit and vegetable crops, as
well as the factors that influence their adoption.
Contact: Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo
and Craig Osteen.
Soil management
The way farmers manage soil, including their tillage and rotation
systems, can greatly alter fertilizer, pesticide and other input
use. Responsible soil management can reduce soil erosion and limit
water and chemical infiltration and runoff. This project examines
the characteristics of soil management practices such as tillage
and rotation systems, and analyzes the economic and policy factors
that influence farmers to adopt them. The project will assess the
economic and environmental effects of these choices.
Contact: Richard Magleby.
Nutrient management
Crop and livestock production often delivers excess nutrients (nitrogen,
phoshphate, etc.) to the environment, which can pollute ground and
surface waters and harm human and ecosystem health. Certain technologies
and practicessoil testing, crop rotation, nitrogen inhibitors,
the use of manure, fertilizer application method and timing, and precision
agriculturemay reduce these harmful impacts. This project will
assess the extent to which such nutrient management strategies are
adopted, and analyze the effects of policies and regulations imposed
on animal feeding operations.
Contact: Stan Daberkow
and Noel Gollehon.
for more information, contact:
Lee Christensen
web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov
page updated: March 22, 2001
|