GREETINGS!
This is the first in a series of updates from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to keep you
informed of the planning progress for the proposed Alameda National Wildlife Refuge (NWR).
This update explains how to get involved in the planning process for the refuge, describes some of the concepts and options for managing lands transferred to the Service, and includes a schedule of upcoming public workshops and other events.
HELP US PLAN THE PROPOSED ALAMEDA REFUGE
The planning process has just begun. This is a good opportunity for you to help the Fish and
Wildlife Service identify issues and concerns, and for us to answer your questions. Your
participation is an integral part of the development of this proposed new refuge, and we would
like to meet you and get acquainted with your concerns. A public workshop/open house is
scheduled for August 12, 1997.
PUBLIC WORKSHOP/OPEN HOUSE
This is the first public planning meeting for the proposed Alameda National Wildlife Refuge.
WHEN: 6 p.m.- 9 p.m., August 12, 1997
WHERE: Alameda High School Cafeteria, located on Central Avenue between Walnut and Oak
Streets.
DIRECTIONS TO OPEN HOUSE:
If you are traveling on Highway 880 (Nimitz Freeway), take the High Street exit. Go west toward
Alameda. After crossing a small bridge, continue several blocks to Central Avenue. Turn right
and drive approximately 10 blocks to 2200 Central Avenue. This is the address of the Kofman
Auditorium, a large building with tall columns. The cafeteria is located in the building next to the
auditorium (no address on front).
PARKING: Limited parking is permitted on site. A parking lot is available 1 ½ blocks north on
Walnut. Please make sure that your car is parked in a legal space; cars parked illegally will be
towed.
WORKSHOP/OPEN HOUSE AGENDA
At 6 p.m., the Fish and Wildlife Service will give a brief presentation regarding the refuge
program and the planning process. The open house will start about 6:30 p.m. Staff from Service
offices in California and the Regional Office in Portland, Oregon will be available to discuss
habitat management options for the proposed Alameda NWR.
SUBMITTING COMMENTS
If you have questions or concerns, please bring them to the workshop/open house, call one of the
numbers on the "Who to Contact" list, or send us a letter or e-mail message. The issue
identification period ends September 12, 1997, so make sure we receive your comments by that
date.
Please provide written comments to Charles Houghten, Chief, Planning Branch, ARW/RE, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11th Ave., Portland, Oregon 97232-4181. Please send e-mail comments (with "Alameda NWR" typed in the subject line) to r1planning_guest@fws.gov.
WHAT'S NEXT?
The issues identified in this part of the planning process are the driving factors for the next step
in the process--developing wildlife management and habitat protection alternatives. These
alternatives, which will address the concerns and issues of affected parties, will be described and
analyzed in a management plan and environmental assessment.
You will have an opportunity to review both documents and provide comments. You will also be notified of any public meetings or workshops that may be held in the future.
PLANNING SCHEDULE, PROPOSED ALAMEDA NWR
Planning Step and Completion Dates*
Planning Update 1 issued; open house announced, July 1997
Public workshop/open house, Aug. 12, 1997
Issue identification period ends, Sept. 12, 1997
Alameda NWR Draft Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Assessment released, Nov. 1997 Public workshop/Open house, Dec. 1997
Comment period ends, Jan. 1998
Final Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Assessment released, March 1998
Public notice of decision for Alameda NWR, March 1998
*Unforeseen circumstances could cause changes. We will keep you posted if any major planning
dates change.
FWS PLANNING DOCUMENTS
The comprehensive management plan will present an overview of the Service's proposed
management approaches to wildlife and habitats, public uses and wildlife-dependent recreational
activities, facilities, and public outreach within the proposed refuge. These proposed
management actions would only apply to lands and waters within the National Wildlife Refuge
System.
The environmental assessment will analyze alternative proposals for protection of wildlife and habitat in the proposed refuge and the potential effects of those alternatives.
PROJECT BACKGROUND AND WILDLIFE
The 2,796-acre Naval Air Station Alameda was closed on April 25, 1997. The Service has
requested 900 acres (525 acres of land and 375 acres of open water) for use as a wildlife refuge .
Thus, the lands and waters within the proposed Alameda National Wildlife Refuge would
continue their importance for "flight operations"-- for bird species.
More than 200 pairs of California least terns, an endangered species, nest adjacent to an airport taxiway each spring/summer. This tern colony is at the northern limit of its range and is extremely important to overall species survival. The nesting site ranks in the top three for chick production and is especially important during "El Nino" years when tern production in southern California decreases. The Navy was a very good tern steward, monitoring the colony, maintaining the nest site substrate, constructing a protective fence, and removing predators.
The breakwater within the proposed Alameda NWR is a summer/fall roost site for more than 400 endangered California brown pelicans. It is considered the most important roost, and the only known night roost, in San Francisco Bay. The breakwater is also used by harbor seals, including pups, as a haul-out area. The second largest western gull colony in central and northern California nests on the breakwater. Wetland areas within the proposed refuge boundaries support the largest Caspian tern nesting colony on the Pacific coast (as many as 1,000 nests!), and nesting ducks, geese, shorebirds, and other waterbirds. Burrowing owl, northern harrier, and loggerhead shrike are other sensitive or rare species that nest within the proposed refuge.
PRELIMINARY GOALS FOR THE PROPOSED ALAMEDA REFUGE
KEY AREAS OF MANAGEMENT FOCUS
The following section describes some of the management approaches that are being considered if
the refuge is established.
On national wildlife refuges, wildlife management activities are always the primary land use. However, the Service promotes the wildlife-dependent recreational activities of wildlife observation and photography, interpretation, environmental education, hunting, and fishing, whenever those uses are compatible with the purpose of the refuge. Other public and economic uses may be considered if they are compatible with refuge purposes.
The primary management focus for the proposed Alameda NWR would be wildlife protection and habitat management. The Service is committed to providing high-quality, safe, and accessible wildlife-dependent interpretive, recreational, and educational opportunities at the proposed Alameda NWR within the capabilities of available staff and budget.
Your input will be used to help develop the refuge management plan. The following ideas are a beginning point for our discussion of management of the proposed Alameda NWR.
Habitat Management. The primary focus of habitat management would be the protection and recovery of California least tern. Potential actions could include control of exotic vegetation; maintenance, enhancement, and expansion of the existing breeding site; installation of additional electric fence around nesting sites; and construction and maintenance of a chain-link perimeter fence to protect terns from terrestrial predators, human trespass, and other disturbance. A secondary objective would be the enhancement and recovery of existing wetland habitat, which could include removing exotic vegetation, restoring native vegetation species, and implementing other management measures for the benefit of wetland and wildlife species.
Population Monitoring. Monitoring of the tern colony during breeding season (March through August) would be similar to that presently occurring under Navy management. The tern monitoring would document the presence of adults, nesting success, and the presence of fledglings until all chick fledge.
Nuisance Species Management. The Service proposes a proactive approach to predator management, similar to that occurring at other tern nesting sites throughout California. Preventative measures, including the reduction of predator habitat and raptor perches immediately adjacent to the tern nesting site, would be attempted first. When preventative measures are ineffective, a variety of other management techniques would be employed. Nonnative target mammals such as red foxes and feral cats would be trapped and removed. Other predators may be controlled if they are considered a threat to nesting birds or if populations are determined to be artificially high due to human influence. The Service would seek a population balance for natural predatory animals.
Public Use Opportunities. Lands within the proposed Alameda NWR are owned by the Department of the Navy and have been open in the past to limited use by the public. Once these lands become a refuge, stewardship of the natural resources would be the paramount goal and public use that supported this goal would be considered. Wildlife-dependent use is generally encouraged on national wildlife refuges as long as those uses are compatible with the primary purpose(s) for which the refuge is established, adequate funding and staff are available, and the uses are consistent with other management programs.
Because of its location in a major urban area, the proposed Alameda NWR will offer an excellent opportunity for public contact. Environmental education would be an important element of public use. Docent-led tours of the area are being considered.
The refuge intends to cooperate with the East Bay Regional Park District to plan a perimeter trail for public access around the airfield site. During the tern breeding season, the portion of the trail from runway wetland to the northwest edge of the west wetland would be closed to public access.
Interpretive activities and an opportunity to view the least tern colony would be provided in the adjacent control tower or observation deck. In addition, a viewing platform is being considered for the north end of the west wetland to allow the public to view the Caspian tern colony and other water birds. Interpretive signs and panels would be located in viewing areas to inform the public about wildlife and access restrictions.
Public use regulations are needed to insure public safety, maintain the quality of the outdoor experience, and protect natural resources. General public use regulations for national wildlife refuges are found in Subchapter C, Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations. Public and other secondary uses that are generally not authorized may be permitted through a special use permit on a case-by-case basis, if these uses are compatible with the refuge purposes.
Non-recreational Uses. The Service is considering leasing a portion of the runway and taxiways as a limited-use private airport, if it is determined that this activity is compatible with refuge purposes and the Alameda community agrees on the need for an airfield. Since the tern colony flourished under past airport operations, an even more restricted airport operation may be compatible.
Road Access. Trail access would be limited to pedestrians and bicycles only. No vehicle access to the perimeter trail would be granted to the general public.
Law Enforcement. An on-site assistant refuge manager would have law enforcement authority to control trespass, violation of wildlife laws, and other violations. Additional law enforcement assistance will be provided by staff from the San Francisco Bay NWR Complex in Fremont.
Facilities Management. The site has several existing bunkers and small supply buildings. Bunkers may be maintained for refuge purposes or leased to private individuals. Unnecessary structures would be removed to minimize raptor perches in proximity to tern nest sites. Boundaries of any lands acquired by the Service would be posted with refuge signs.
Who to Contact
If you have comments or questions, please write or call us at the following locations:
Information on Proposed Alameda NWR Management
Marge Kolar, Project Leader
San Francisco Bay NWR Complex
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 524
Newark, California 94560
(510) 792-0222; fax (510) 792-5828
Joelle Buffa, Wildlife Biologist
San Francisco Bay NWR Complex
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 524
Newark, California 94560
(510) 792-0222; fax (510) 792-5828
Information on Proposed Alameda NWR Planning
Cathy Osugi, Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
911 NE 11th Avenue, 3rd Floor West
Portland, Oregon 97232-4181
(503) 231-2231 or (800) 662-8933
Fax (503) 231-6161
Information on Alameda County Endangered Species Issues
Jim Browning, Fish and Wildlife Biologist
Mike Thabault, Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 130
Sacramento, California 95821-6340
(916) 979-2752; fax (916) 979-2744
Information on Land Acquisition
Jackie Cumpton, Realty Specialist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
2233 Watt Avenue, Suite 375
Sacramento, California 95825-0509
(916) 979-2085; fax (916) 979-2092