Joint DMS/NIGMS Initiative to Support Research in the Area of Mathematical
Biology
NSF 02-125
DIVISION OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
DIRECTORATE FOR MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
DEADLINE(S): |
August 11, 2002 |
|
June 30, 2003 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
NATIONAL
INSTITUTE FOR GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES
NATIONAL
SCIENCE FOUNDATION
The National Science Foundation promotes
and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding
grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences,
mathematics, and engineering.
To get the latest information about program deadlines, to
download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit
the NSF Web Site at:
Location: |
4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230 |
For General Information (NSF Information Center): |
(703) 292-5111 |
TDD (for the hearing-impaired): |
(703) 292-5090 |
To Order Publications or Forms: |
|
Send an e-mail to: |
pubs@nsf.gov |
or telephone: |
(301) 947-2722 |
|
|
To Locate NSF Employees: |
(703) 292-5111 |
SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
Program Title: Joint DMS/NIGMS Initiative to Support Research in the
Area of Mathematical Biology
Synopsis of Program: The Division of Mathematical Sciences in the Directorate
for Mathematical and Physical Sciences at the National Science Foundation and
the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at the National Institutes
of Health plan to support research in mathematics and statistics related to
mathematical biology research. Both agencies recognize the need for additional
research at the boundary between the mathematical sciences and the life sciences.
This competition is designed to encourage new collaborations at this interface,
as well as to support existing ones. Awards made through this competition are
dependent upon responsiveness of the proposals to the announcement, the quality
of the proposed research, and the availability of funds. DMS and NIGMS anticipate
making 20-25 awards totaling about $6 million, in each of fiscal years 2003-2005.
The projected range is from $100,000 to $400,000 per award per year (total
costs), with durations of 4-5 years. Awards made from this competition may
be made by either DMS or NIGMS, at the option of the agencies, not the grantee.
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
-
Dr. Keith N. Crank (General Questions), Mathematical Sciences, Program
Director, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Mathematical Sciences,
Room 1025, telephone: 703-292-4880, e-mail: kcrank@nsf.gov.
-
Dr. Michael H. Steuerwalt (Mathematical Questions), Applied and Computational
Mathematics, Program Director, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division
of Mathematical Sciences, Room 1025, telephone: 703-292-4860, e-mail: msteuerw@nsf.gov.
-
Dr. John Stufken (Statistical Questions), Statistics, Program Director,
Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Mathematical Sciences, Room
1025, telephone: 703-292-4881, e-mail: jstufken@nsf.gov.
-
Dr. John Whitmarsh (Biological Questions), Program Director, Division of
Cell Biology and Biophysics, NIGMS, Building 45, NIGMS, NIH, telephone: 301-594-0828,
e-mail: whitmarj@nigms.nih.gov.
-
Dr. James Anderson (Biological Questions), Program Director, Division of
Genetics and Developmental Biology, NIGMS, Room 2AS.25A, Building 45, NIGMS,
NIH, telephone: 301-594-0943, e-mail: andersoj@nigms.nih.gov.
-
Dr. Samuel M. Scheiner (Biological Questions), Program Director, Directorate
for Biological Sciences, Division of Environmental Biology, Room 635,
telephone: 703-292-7175, e-mail: sscheine@nsf.gov
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):
- 47.049 --- Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- 93.821 --- NIGMS Cell Biology and Biophysics
- 93.862 --- NIGMS Genetics and Developmental Biology
- 93.859 --- NIGMS Pharmacology, Physiology and Biological Chemistry
ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
- Organization Limit: None
- PI Eligibility Limit: None
- Limit on Number of Proposals: None
AWARD INFORMATION
- Anticipated Type of Award: Standard or Continuing Grant
- Estimated Number of Awards: 20-25
- Anticipated Funding Amount: $6 million in each of FY 2003-2005,
subject to availability of funds. Award sizes are expected to range from
$100,000 to $400,000 per year with durations of 4-5 years.
PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
- Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: Deviations From Standard
Preparation Guidelines
- The program announcement/solicitation contains deviations from the standard
Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) proposal preparation guidelines. Please see
the full program announcement/solicitation for further information.
B. Budgetary Information
- Cost Sharing Requirements: Cost Sharing is not required
- Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: None
- Other Budgetary Limitations: None
C. Deadline/Target Dates
- Letter of Intent Due Date(s): None
- Preproposal Due Date(s): None
- Full Proposal Due Date(s): August 11, 2002, June 30, 2003, and June
30, 2004
D. FastLane Requirements
- FastLane Submission: Required
- FastLane Contact(s):
- Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Mathematical
Sciences, Room 1005, telephone: 703-292-8802, e-mail: dmsfl@nsf.gov.
PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
- Merit Review Criteria: National Science Board and NIH approved criteria.
Additional merit review considerations apply. Please see the full program
announcement/solicitation for further information.
AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
- Award Conditions: Additional award conditions apply. Please see
the program announcement/solicitation for further information.
- Reporting Requirements: Additional reporting requirements apply.
Please see the full program announcement/solicitation for further information.
SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
- ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
- AWARD INFORMATION
- PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
- Proposal Preparation Instructions
- Budgetary Information
- Deadline/Target Dates
- Fastlane Requirements
- PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
- NSF Proposal Review Process
- Review Protocol and Associated Customer Service
Standard
- AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
- Notification of the Award
- Award Conditions
- Reporting Requirements
- CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
- OTHER PROGRAMS OF INTEREST
Revolutionary opportunities have emerged for mathematically
driven advances in biological research. These opportunities are recognized
by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), as well as by
the National Science Foundation (NSF). Expertise of the NSF in the mathematical
sciences, along with its ties to the mathematical sciences research community,
and the expertise of the NIH in biological and biomedical research make this
an area where cooperation between the two agencies is appropriate.
This competition is designed to support research on mathematical problems
related to biological problems in areas supported by NIGMS. A direct relationship
between
a biological application and the mathematics is expected. Research teams,
which include scientists from both the life sciences community and the mathematical
sciences community, are encouraged. Both new and existing collaborations
will
be supported. Proposals from individual investigators will need to make the
case that the individual has expertise in both areas.
Successful proposals will identify innovative mathematics or statistics needed
to solve an important biological problem. Research which would apply known
mathematics or statistics to solve biological problems is not appropriate for
this competition and should be submitted directly to NIH. Similarly, research
in mathematics or statistics, which is not tied to a specific biological problem,
should be submitted to the appropriate DMS Program at NSF. Applications designed
to create new software tools based on existing models and methods will not
be accepted in this competition.
II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Division of Mathematical Sciences within the Directorate for Mathematical
and Physical Sciences and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences
anticipate supporting research in the mathematical sciences with biological
applications. Appropriate application areas are those currently supported by
the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.
Proposals which are not appropriate for funding by NIGMS will be returned
without review. Investigators are strongly encouraged to talk with an NIGMS
contact person before submitting a proposal. Other questions should be addressed
to the appropriate person in the list of contacts.
Examples of areas of research that are appropriate under this competition
are the following:
- Evolutionary theory and practice arising from genomics advances;
- Statistical and other approaches to the discovery of genes contributing
to complex behavior, and their environmental interactions;
- Explanatory and predictive models of the cellular state;
- Growth, motility, cell division, membrane trafficking, and other cellular
behavior;
- Metabolic circuitry and dynamics;
- Signal transduction;
- Informational molecule dynamics;
- Design principles and dynamics of pattern formation in development and
differentiation;
- New approaches to the prediction of molecular structure;
- Improved algorithms for structure determination by x-ray crystallography,
NMR and electron microscopy;
- Simulations of the human systemic responses to burn, trauma and other injury;
- New approaches to understanding system wide effects of pharmacological
agents and anesthetics, and their genetic and environmental modifiers.
These areas of research are examples only. They are not meant to be inclusive.
The categories of proposers identified in the Grant
Proposal Guide are eligible to submit proposals under this program announcement/solicitation.
This includes scientists at Federally Funded Research and Development Centers
(FFRDCs). Scientists at foreign institutions may also be supported, but proposals
must be submitted by a US institution.
IV. AWARD INFORMATION
It is estimated that approximately $6 million will be available
for each year of this competition. Award sizes are expected to range from $100,000
to $400,000 per year (total costs) with durations of 4-5 years. Estimated program
budget, number of awards and average award size/duration are subject to the
availability of funds.
Upon conclusion of the review process, meritorious applications may be recommended
for funding by either NIGMS or DMS, at the option of the agencies, not the
applicant. Subsequent grant administration procedures will be in accordance
with the individual policies of the awarding agency.
V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
Full Proposal Instructions:
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement/solicitation
should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines
contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of
the GPG is available electronically on the NSF Web Site at: http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpg.
Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse,
telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
Biographical Sketches are limited to three pages each and are required for
all senior personnel. In addition to the information required by the GPG, each
Biographical Sketch must include a paragraph describing that person's role
in the project.
Both NSF and NIH have rules regarding the use of human subjects and/or vertebrate
animals in research. Proposals MUST include the information required by both
agencies. See the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (Proposal Preparation, Special Guidelines)
AND the PHS Form 398 (http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/section_1.html#e_humansubs and http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/section_1.html#f_vertebrate_ani
mals) for additional information.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program solicitation number (Not Specified)
in the program announcement/solicitation block on the proposal Cover Sheet.
Proposals should be submitted to the Infrastructure Program, in the Division
of Mathematical Sciences. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining
the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information
may delay processing.
B. Budgetary Information
Cost sharing is not required in proposals submitted under this Program Announcement.
Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: None
Other Budgetary Limitations: None
C. Deadline/Target Dates
Proposals must be submitted by the following date(s):
Full Proposals by 5:00 PM local time: August 11, 2002
June 30, 2003
June 30, 2004
D. FastLane Requirements
Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals
for this Program Announcement through the FastLane system. Detailed instructions
for proposal preparation and submission via FastLane are available at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm.
For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or
e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane
Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane
system. Specific questions related to this Program Announcement should be referred
to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this announcement/solicitation.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational
Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit
the required proposal certifications (see Chapter
II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications).
The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working
days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Proposers are no
longer required to provide a paper copy of the signed Proposal Cover Sheet
to NSF. Further instructions regarding this process are available on the FastLane
website at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov.
VI. PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
- A. Proposal Review Process
- Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise
in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. These
reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of
the review process. Although the applicant, at the time of submission must
not suggest the names of potential reviewers, NSF invites the proposer to
list the names of inappropriate reviewers. Care is taken to ensure
that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made
to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority-serving institutions,
or adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal.
- Proposals will be reviewed against the following general review criteria
established by the National Science Board. Following each criterion are potential
considerations that the reviewer may employ in the evaluation. These are
suggestions and not all will apply equally to any given proposal. Each reviewer
will be asked to address only those that are relevant to the proposal and
for which he/she is qualified to make judgements.
-
- What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? (This criterion
also includes the main considerations that are used by NIH to assess the
merit of applications and assign priority scores. The specific NIH criteria
are shown in Italics following the NSF considerations.)
-
- How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding
within its own field or across different fields? Significance: Does this
study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved,
how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these
studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field?
-
- How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project?
(If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior
work.) Investigator: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well
suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the
experience level of the principal investigator and other researchers (if
any)?
-
- To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and
original concepts? Innovation: Does the project employ novel concepts,
approaches or methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project
challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?
-
- How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Approach: Are
the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed,
well integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant
acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics?
-
- Is there sufficient access to resources? Environment: Does the scientific
environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability
of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features
of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements?
Is there evidence of institutional support?
-
- What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting
teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden
the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability,
geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for
research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and
partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific
and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed
activity to society?
Principal Investigators should address the following elements in their
proposal to provide reviewers with the information necessary to respond fully
to both of the above-described merit review criteria. NSF staff will give
these elements careful consideration in making funding decisions.
- Integration of Research and Education
One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration
of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities
it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide
abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities
as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint
efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich
research through the diversity of learning perspectives.
-
- Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens --
women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities
-- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF
is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs,
projects, and activities it considers and supports.
-
Additional Review Criteria
Proposals submitted to this competition will be evaluated based on their value
in advancing mathematical or statistical theory or methodology, as well as
their impact on important biological problems.
Where relevant, applications will also be reviewed with respect to
the following:
- The adequacy of the plans to include both genders, minorities and their
subgroups, and children as appropriate to the scientific goals of the research.
If the proposed research includes human subjects plans for the recruitment
and retention of subjects should be included. (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/guidelines_update.htm and http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm)
- The reasonableness of the proposed budget and duration in relation to the
proposed research.
- The adequacy of the proposed protection for humans, animals, or the environment,
to the extent they may be adversely affected by the project proposed in the
application.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and signed by
each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents.
Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent
to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Director. In
addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award
or decline funding.
- B. Review Protocol and Associated Customer Service
Standard
- All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside
NSF/NIH who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal.
Proposals submitted in response to this announcement/solicitation will be
reviewed by Panel Review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support
or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's
review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
- NSF will be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined
or recommended for funding within six months for 95 percent of proposals.
The time interval begins on the proposal deadline or target date or from
the date of receipt, if deadlines or target dates are not used by the program.
The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's
recommendation.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals
recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements
for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing
and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that
only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or
awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment
on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions
with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that
makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative
agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at its
own risk.
- For those grants to be considered for funding by NIH, the applicant will
be asked to prepare a second submission on the standard PHS 398 form. The
results of the review will be presented to the National Advisory General
Medical Sciences Council for the second level of review. This review is
designed to assess the relevance of proposals to the mission of NIGMS.
Subsequent to the Council review, NIGMS will make its funding determination
and selected awards will be made.
-
This section provides and overview of the award administration policies and
process for the NSF. The NIH has similar procedures and requirements with some
differences in details and deadlines. For more information on NIH policy and
requirements for grants, see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm.
Specific questions on NIH and NIGMS policies can be addressed to the contacts
listed at the end of this announcement.
- Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by
a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements or by a Grants
Management Officer at NIGMS. Organizations whose proposals are declined will
be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program Division
administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the
identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal
Investigator. (See section VI.A. for additional information on the review
process.)
- An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special
provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2)
the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which
NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals
or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in
the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General
Conditions (NSF-GC-1)* or Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Terms and
Conditions* and (5) announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated
by reference in the award letter. Cooperative agreement awards also are administered
in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions (CA-1).
Electronic mail notification is the preferred way to transmit NSF awards
to organizations that have electronic mail capabilities and have requested
such notification from the Division of Grants and Agreements.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/home/grants/grants_gac.htm.
Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone
(301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
- More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in the
NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, available electronically
on the NSF Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpm.
The GPM is also for sale through the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402. The telephone number at GPO
for subscription information is (202) 512-1800. The GPM may be ordered
through the GPO Web site at http://www.gpo.gov.
-
C. Reporting Requirements
- Grants made by NSF will be subject to NSF's reporting requirements. Grants
made by NIH will be subject to NIH's reporting requirements. The following
information is for NSF grants only. For information about NIH reporting
requirements, contact the NIH grants officer listed in the next section.
- For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants),
the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer
at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after the expiration of an award, the PI also is required
to submit a final project report.
- Approximately 30 days before expiration, NSF will send a notice to remind
the PI of the requirement to file the final project report. Failure to
provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending
proposals for that PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports
in advance to assure availability of required data.
NSF has implemented an electronic project reporting system, available
through FastLane. This system permits electronic submission and updating
of project reports, including information on: project participants (individual
and organizational); activities and findings; publications; and other specific
products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information
previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the
electronic system.
VIII. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
General inquiries regarding Joint NSF/NIGMS Initiative to Support Research
in the Area of Mathematical Biology should be made to:
- Dr. Keith N. Crank (General Questions), Mathematical Sciences, Program
Director, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Mathematical Sciences,
Room 1025, telephone: 703-292-4880, e-mail: kcrank@nsf.gov.
- Dr. Michael H. Steuerwalt (Mathematical Questions), Applied and Computational
Mathematics, Program Director, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division
of Mathematical Sciences, Room 1025, telephone: 703-292-4860, e-mail: msteuerw@nsf.gov.
- Dr. John Stufken (Statistical Questions), Statistics, Program Director,
Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Mathematical Sciences, Room
1025, telephone: 703-292-4881, e-mail: jstufken@nsf.gov.
- Dr. John Whitmarsh (Biological Questions),Program Director, Division of
Cell Biology and Biophysics, NIGMS, Building 45, NIGMS, NIH, telephone: 301-594-0828,
e-mail: whitmarj@nigms.nih.gov.
- Dr. James Anderson (Biological Questions), Program Director, Division of
Genetics and Developmental Biology, NIGMS, Room 2AS.25A, Building 45, NIGMS,
NIH, telephone: 301-594-0943, e-mail: andersoj@nigms.nih.gov.
- Dr. Samuel M. Scheiner (Biological Questions), Program Director, Directorate
for Biological Sciences, Division of Environmental Biology, Room 635, telephone:
703-292-7175, e-mail: sscheine@nsf.gov
- For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact:
-
- Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Division of Mathematical
Sciences, Room 1005, telephone: 703-292-8802, e-mail: dmsfl@nsf.gov.
For questions related to NIGMS grants management issues,
contact:
- Joe Ellis, Grants Management Officer, NIGMS, NIH; telephone: 301-594-5135,
e-mail: ellisj@nigms.nih.gov.
IX. OTHER PROGRAMS OF INTEREST
- The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research
and education in science, mathematics, and engineering. The NSF Guide
to Programs is available electronically at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp.
General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information
for proposal submission are provided in each chapter.
Many NSF programs offer announcements or solicitations concerning specific
proposal requirements. To obtain additional information about these requirements,
contact the appropriate NSF program offices. Any changes in NSF's fiscal
year programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs will
be announced in the NSF E-Bulletin,
which is updated daily on the NSF Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin,
and in individual program announcements/solicitations. Subscribers can
also sign up for NSF's Custom
News Service (http://www.nsf.gov/home/cns/start.htm)
to be notified of new funding opportunities that become available.
- NIGMS has a number of programs related to complex systems and the desire
to bring mathematicians into the area of biomedical research. Information
can be obtained at: http://www.nigms.nih.gov/funding/complex_systems.html.
ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
- The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in
most fields of science and engineering. Awardees are wholly responsible
for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication.
Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or
their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and
educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities and persons
with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with
Federal statutes, regulations and NSF policies, no person on grounds of
race, color, age, sex, national origin or disability shall be excluded
from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF (unless
otherwise specified in the eligibility requirements for a particular program).
- Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED)
provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons
with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research
assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the program announcement/solicitation
for further information.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD)
and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals
with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs,
employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090,
FIRS at 1-800-877-8339.
The National Science Foundation is committed to making all of the information
we publish easy to understand. If you have a suggestion about how to improve
the clarity of this document or other NSF-published materials, please contact
us at plainlanguage@nsf.gov.
PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENTS
- The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited
under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as
amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with
the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees
will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive
Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified
reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process;
to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding
the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of
awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers
and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government
agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order
to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in
a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party.
Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer
file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers
or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal
Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register
267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated
Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the
information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information,
however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless it
displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this collection
is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other
aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing
this burden, to: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, Division of
Administrative Services, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230,
or to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk
Officer for National Science Foundation (3145-0058), 725 17th Street, N.W.
Room 10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.
- OMB control number: 3145-0058.
- Replaces NSF 01-128