NATIONAL SCIENCE
FOUNDATION |
|
|
|
Directorate for Geosciences
Full Proposal Deadline(s):
November 6, 2002
by 5:00 p.m. submitters local time
REVISIONS AND UPDATES
Effective October 29, 2002, the deadline date was changed from October
30, 2002 to November 6, 2002.
SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
General Information
Program Title:
Synopsis of Program:
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
- Michael A. Mayhew, Program Director, Division
of Earth Sciences, Education and Human Resources, 785 S, telephone:
(703) 292-8557, fax: (703) 292-9025, email: mmayhew@nsf.gov
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number(s):
Eligibility Information
- Organization Limit: None
Specified.
- PI Eligibility Limit: None
Specified.
- Limit on Number of Proposals:
None Specified.
Award Information
- Anticipated Type of Award: Continuing
Grant
- Estimated Number of Awards: Not Specified.
- Anticipated Funding Amount:
$1.2 million in FY 2003 pending availability
of funds.
Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
B. Budgetary Information
- Cost Sharing Requirements: Cost Sharing is not required.
- Indirect Cost (F&A;) Limitations: Not Applicable.
- Other Budgetary Limitations: Not Applicable.
C. Due Dates
- Full Proposal Deadline Date(s):
November 6, 2002
by 5:00 p.m. submitters local time
D. FastLane Requirements
- FastLane Submission: Full proposal submission is required.
- FastLane Contact(s):
- Brian E. Dawson, Information Technology
Specialist, 705 N, telephone: (703) 292-4727, fax: (703) 292-9042,
email: bdawson@nsf.gov
Proposal Review Information
- Merit Review Criteria: National Science Board approved criteria.
Additional merit review considerations apply. Please see the full funding
opportunity document for further information.
Award Administration Information
- Award Conditions: Additional award conditions apply. Please
see the full funding opportunity document for further information.
- Reporting Requirements: Standard NSF reporting requirements
apply.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Program Requirements
- Introduction
- Program Description
- Eligibility Information
- Award Information
- Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
- Proposal Preparation Instructions
- Budgetary Information
- Due Dates
- FastLane Requirements
- Proposal Review Information
- NSF Proposal Review Process
- Review Protocol and Associated Customer
Service Standard
- Award Administration Information
- Notification of the Award
- Award Conditions
- Reporting Requirements
- Contacts for Additional Information
- Other Programs of Interest
I. INTRODUCTION
The Digital Library for Earth System Education (DLESE) is a distributed,
community-based electronic library dedicated to improving the quality,
quantity, and efficiency of teaching and learning about the Earth system
at all educational levels. It capitalizes on developments
in modern information technology to make full use of, and bring order
to, the World Wide Web for the purpose of empowering any teacher, learner,
or citizen seeking to understand the Earth system to easily discover
the right educational materials for their purposes and be assured of
their high quality.
DLESE is a product of the wide recognition of the need for improved
science education across the national, state, and local levels and greater
access to quality science education for all. Emerging information
and communications technologies present a means of maximizing investments
in science education by providing the necessary integration services
and community support to promote synergy across otherwise disparate
projects.
DLESE was founded at the seminal 1999 Portal to the Future workshop,
at which the basic program structure and mechanisms for community-based
governance were established. The full program plan was subsequently
articulated in the DLESE Community Plan, which laid out the community's
vision for the first stages of library development; the plan was later
codified in a DLESE Strategic Plan. Both plans can be found
at www.dlese.org under "Documents
About DLESE". The Strategic Plan articulates a pathway
to a reliable, robust, operational library that is designed to integrate
across distributed community collections.
Two NSF awards since 1999 have supported the initial phases of library
development. A DLESE Program Center (DPC) was established
at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) as an
operational hub to support the development of the technical infrastructure
of the library (the scope of the technical support provided by the DPC
can be seen at www.dlese.org under
"About DLESE"). A collaboration of the DPC, Carleton
College, Montana State,
and the University of Colorado
"in partnership with other important
institutions and with extensive community input" has produced a
working prototype library. Over 2000 resources in the initial
collection can be accessed by a discovery system that enables users
to search by grade level, educational resource type, and keyword. This
version also contains a Resource Cataloger, community-oriented services
such as discussion forums for established working groups and "discussion
groups", and a community opportunities and announcements posting
tool. The working library prototype can be accessed
via www.dlese.org.
DLESE has always been conceived as a grass-roots organization, community-built
and community-governed. Community governance is effected
by the Steering Committee and its four Standing Committees: Users, Collections,
Technology, and Services (see www.dlese.org under
"About DLESE"). The Steering Committee provides
guidance and oversight to an operational core. As DLESE now
moves into a fully operational phase, the operational core is to consist
of five tightly-integrated service areas headed by an Executive Director. The
Executive Director will head a Management Council, on which each of
the service areas is represented. The first of the service
areas is the DPC, hosted by UCAR. NSF funding for the DPC
is being sought through a stand-alone proposal separate from this solicitation. Proposals
for operation of the other four service areas are being invited through
the present solicitation. These are:
- Collections Services: Extensive outreach
to individuals and institutions to identify and enable the accession
of high-quality Earth system resources into the library and to facilitate
the early establishment of a rigorous peer-review system. As
presently envisioned, the system will enable multiple pathways to
a reviewed DLESE collection.
- Community Services: Extensive
outreach to individuals and institutions to facilitate the use of
and contributions to the library, to enable community interaction
via the library, and to nurture the use of best practices to enable
learning about the Earth system.
- Data Services: Engage
projects involving the development and use of tools in order to facilitate
access via DLESE to Earth system data sets residing on remote servers,
promote exemplary use of data in educational applications, and organize
interaction between data providers and data users.
- Evaluation Services: Ongoing
monitoring of efficacy of use of DLESE collections and its value in
substantively improving learning about the Earth system.
The nature of the DLESE core services will be elaborated in the next
section.
Although each of the non-DPC services is conceived as a high-priority
focus for DLESE in its own right, close interaction among the services
and especially between each service and the DPC will be crucial to the
effective operation of the DLESE core in building the library. Coordinating
and promoting the effective interaction of the core services will be
the job of the DLESE Executive Director.
DLESE operates within the framework of the NSF-sponsored National Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Digital Library (NSDL) (www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/DUE/programs/nsdl). DLESE
is the geoscience disciplinary component of NSDL. Members
of the DLESE community are part of the NSDL leadership. It
is a fundamental principle that DLESE collections must be interoperable
with NSDL collections, and that in general DLESE technical standards
are compatible with NSDL standards. It will be important
that each of the DLESE core services interface closely with NSDL.
II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The intent of this solicitation is to invite proposals from the community
to provide four key DLESE services, which, together with the DLESE Program
Center (a fifth core service), will constitute the comprehensive operational
facility needed to support the building of the library. Awardees
will be providing a service to the community, not as an isolated activity,
but as part of a larger, well-integrated team.
Thus, PIs whose proposals are rated as highly meritorious in peer review
will be expected as a condition of award, in a post-review process of
negotiation involving the relevant parties and NSF, to coordinate their
work through the DLESE Executive Director with other potential projects
and the DPC. It is anticipated that a Letter of Agreement
(LOA) will be developed between a potential PI's institution and that
of the Executive Director that 1) specifies the goals of
the service and a time line for achieving them, 2) describes
how the PIs will operate their service once it reaches operational readiness,
3) spells out how a particular service will collaborate with and support
other services, and 4) specifies how the DPC will support the service. PIs
will need to agree via the LOA to adhere to the overall guidance of
the Executive Director and also adhere to agreed-on time lines. NSF
will assist in the process of generation of draft Letters of Agreement
and will approve the final documents.
Lest this guidance seem overly restrictive, within the constraints
needed to ensure good coordination and a well-integrated operation,
it is also anticipated that PIs will have much latitude to operate creatively
on behalf of the community; this will be welcome.
The leader of each function will be expected to participate as a member
of the DLESE Management Council (MC). Through regular meetings
and conference calls, the MC fosters communication and coordination,
assesses progress toward common goals, and develops policy options for
consideration by the DLESE Steering Committee.
NSF invites proposals seeking to operate one of the four non-DPC core
services: 1) Collections, 2) Community, 3) Data, and 4) Evaluation. The
services are described below. Awards are expected to be made
for 36 months duration. For expected award amounts and anticipated
numbers of awards for the four services, see Section IV ("AWARD INFORMATION")
below. NSF plans to issue a new program solicitation during
year three to continue support for DLESE core services beyond that time.
Partnerships or collaborations are encouraged. While each
service will involve one coherent "project", it may well be
collaborative in nature, involving multiple institutions. This
may come about via the submission of a priori collaborative
proposals. Or NSF may encourage collaborations among
PIs of independent highly-rated proposals post-review.
Proposers for each of the service areas described below should include
in their budgets support for anticipated expertise necessary to support
technical interoperability and effective communication with the technical
staff at the DPC. They should also build in to their budgets
travel expenses for an anticipated two Management Council meetings per
year (in Boulder), two Steering
Committee meetings per year (location varies), and the annual DLESE
Community Meeting (location varies).
Collections Services
Management of the collections service involves extensive outreach to
individuals and organizations holding valuable educational materials
in digital form and facilitating the process of bringing these materials
into the DLESE collection. Such materials will take a wide
variety of forms, for example:
- tools to use data in educational applications
- text (scientific papers, summaries, indices and abstracts)
- images, models, simulations
- animations, videos, multimedia
- lesson plans and curricula, including assessment tools
- guided inquiry sets, modules, problem sets, classroom and lab activities
- tutorials about the Earth for students
- interactive mini-tutorials about pedagogy for faculty
- virtual field trips
- student portfolios
Over 2000 individual resources have already been contributed to the
DLESE collection. Current accessioning practice for individual
resources involves development by the contributor of metadata records
following standards that assure interoperability within DLESE, with
NSDL, and with other libraries (for information about the process, see
the Metadata Working Group site, dlese.org/Metadata/index.htm).
It is recognized that it is important for DLESE to have the capability
of accessioning large, specialized, thematic collections developed by
organizations such as government agencies, professional societies, and
publishers. This will include high-quality content produced
through special agency competitions such as NSF's NSDL, Geoscience Education,
and Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement programs at NSF and
similar programs of other agencies. The DLESE Collections
Standing Committee is heading the development of policies governing
the process; the collections core service will be an important contributor
to this ongoing effort, and will have an important role in outreach
to such organizations.
The DLESE Strategic Plan calls for a two-tiered library containing
1) a "broad" collection consisting of a large number of meritorious
resources or collections of resources intended to fill the needs of
a wide range of users (which may be in various stages of development
and may include valuable "work in progress") and 2) a reviewed
collection consisting of resources which have been through a rigorous
peer review process. An ongoing process is envisioned in
which resources in the broad collection can make their way into the
peer review process and potentially be added to the reviewed collection. For
DLESE to become the "Portal of Choice" for anyone seeking resources
pertaining to the Earth system, attention to quality control is crucial. This
applies to the broad collection as well as the reviewed collection.
With regard to the ongoing development of the broad collection, operators
of collections services will be expected to :
-
Work with the Collections Committee to develop
guidelines for future growth of the broad collection that ensure that
the desirability of creating a large, rich collection is balanced
against the need for an appropriate degree of selectivity, so that
DLESE users can be confident that they can easily find resources that
meet their needs and meet some minimum standard of quality.
-
Develop a specific, rational plan--with time
lines--for "populating the shelves" and a plan for measuring
progress on an ongoing basis. The plan should clearly articulate
how collection development efforts will support the DLESE vision of
a coherent Earth system approach and include strategies for measuring
progress on an ongoing basis.
-
Provide for a small staff dedicated to ongoing
cataloging of resources within the established quality control guidelines
in order to ensure steady collections growth and fill out the general
collection.
-
Work closely with individuals and groups within
the community who are developing specialized collections under NSDL
or other funding to facilitate the accession of their collections
into DLESE consistent with quality control guidelines and an appropriate
Earth systems context.
Resources within the DLESE Reviewed Collection will be limited to those
that have been through a rigorous peer review process. The
peer review system will provide a valuable means for contributors to
improve their materials and ultimately gain professional
recognition for their contributions. Projects are under way
that aim to develop rational pathways to the Reviewed Collection. (see
dlese.ldeo.columbia.edu and
www.usra.edu/esse/jesse/nsf9944.html
). It is expected that other peer review processes will be
developed and become part of the DLESE peer review system. The
Collections core function will work closely with them, and with supporting
tool development efforts at the DPC, to bring the DLESE peer review
system on line at an early date.
Other activities of the collections core service, in collaboration
with the DPC, will include, but not be limited to:
- Development of controlled Earth system science vocabularies and
thesauri
- Incorporation of tools for building personal collection developed
by UC Santa Barbara, NSDL, or elsewhere as they emerge in collaboration
with the DPC
- Cataloging for the DLESE Broad Collection, enlisting the aid of
professional catalogers where necessary
- Collections partnerships with journals, professional societies,
and federal/state agencies
- Cataloging and authoring components for existing resource development
tools or course management systems
The collections function will interface strongly with the DLESE Collections
Standing Committee in the ongoing process of developing policies and
procedures for this area. Proposers should consult the committee's
Web site (www.ldeo.columbia.edu/DLESE/collections),
which is rich in information on policies (Collections Policy, Scope
Policy, Terms of Use) and collections-building concepts.
The DPC will support the collections function through a close collaborative
effort. Currently-planned related technical work at the DPC
includes:
- Extending metadata resource description framework supporting AAAS
Benchmarks, Geography for Life standards, and an expanded Earth System
Science vocabulary
- Developing strategic partnerships (including NSDL) to capitalize
on emerging automatic metadata generation techniques
- Creating collections development and management tools
- Extending resource characterization tools to support indexing by
temporal and spacial dimensions (geo-referenced discovery)
- Developing tools to support community peer review mechanisms
- Refining and automating quality assurance processes
Community Services
The concept of DLESE as a grass-roots organization is of basic importance. The
rationale is that substantive participation of the geoscience community
in its broadest sense, not only in using the library, but
in building it, will result in an operational library that optimally
meets the full spectrum of community needs and have the greatest impact
on learning.
Community Services is envisioned as having a primary responsibility
in this context in three ways: 1) in pursuing
an aggressive outreach program aimed at engaging a wide range of individuals
and organizations with DLESE, thus building the community, 2) in operating
a community center that facilitates the use of a variety of communications
networks serving users and builders of the library for the purpose of
optimizing its benefit to the community, and 3) increasing diversity
in the geoscience community.
While the process of outreach to the community in order to engage individuals
and organizations with the library is a large and multifaceted task
that necessarily needs to be shared by all components of the DLESE core,
Community Services will have special responsibility for leadership in
this important area. Proposers should present an outreach
plan that extends, not only to individuals and organizations engaged
in Earth system education at all levels, but to other important sectors
where partnerships are important to building the library, such as companies
and groups carrying out IT research related to digital libraries, other
digital libraries, publishers, software developers, and the traditional
library community. The outreach activity should rapidly
increase awareness in the community, promote wide usage, facilitate
quality contributions, and bring important external resources to bear
on the library-building process.
Beyond providing high-quality educational resources for teaching and
learning in Earth system science, DLESE is envisioned as an intellectual
commons where users can interact and collaborate in a wide variety of
contexts, including the sharing of information on effective methods
of teaching that link pedagogy and content, methodologies for assessing
impacts on learning, results of research on learning in the geosciences,
and special educational initiatives related to focused research programs. Toward
such ends, operation of the community center will involve the facilitation
of the development and use of effective communications networks.
It is expected that Community Services will work with the DPC in ongoing
development of tools to support topical networks called working groups
or discussion groups (a number of such groups have already been formed:
see "Find/Join a Group" at www.dlese.org) that
can address issues, create an information exchange, and generally facilitate
discussion. It should be possible for community members to
start up new networks of special interest. It will also be
important for the community center to work with the DPC to continue
to develop a clearing house for sharing community information and opportunities.
It is expected that the community center will support community members
in effectively using DLESE resources to improve teaching and learning. Community
Services can 1) work with Collections Services to locate, catalog, and
promote development of resources that provide information on effective
pedagogy, successful teaching practice, and assessment of learning and
2) with the DPC explore mechanisms that support users in
integrating this information with their use of DLESE resources; this
may extend to organizing workshops--both traditional and virtual--for
this purpose.
DLESE has the potential of contributing greatly to the cause of increasing
diversity in the geosciences, an important and formidable challenge. Organizing
this effort must be an important part of the Community Services part
of the DLESE core, and proposers to this element should include a plan
for organizing a DLESE diversity initiative. Proposers are
encouraged to consider the formation of partnerships that effectively
serve this purpose.
The information technology behind DLESE will allow the aggregation
of quality materials that are most appropriate and effective for a given
learning situation and individual learning styles, thus supporting a
wide diversity of learners. It will be possible to disseminate
reviewed and tested materials that have proven to enhance learning across
a wide spectrum. It can provide a forum for discussion of
diversity-related issues, and tools for organizing action addressing
particular issues. DLESE can help to overcome the digital
divide by identifying components of the collections that are suitable
for use by those with limited access to Web technology and by offering
training to educators in use of available technology to access DLESE
in order to improve teaching and learning in all venues.
DLESE has made a start toward a diversity initiative and made it a
high priority. A diversity workshop was held and a report
issued, a focus group was formed, and an initial diversity Web resource
was established. Proposers should consult the DLESE diversity
site, which can be found via "cross-cutting issues" for the Web site;
the discussion area is under Find/Join a Group. They may
also wish to consult the NSF Geosciences diversity site at www.geo.nsf.gov/geo/diversity. A
diversity "workspace" is being developed for the NSDL Communication
Portal (comm.nsdlib.org),
and may be available to proposers.
It is envisioned that Community Services will interface with the Steering
Committee in the development of library policies and procedures via
the Users Standing Committee (oceanography.geol.ucsb.edu/dlese)
and the Services Standing Committee www.atmos.uiuc.edu/dlese.
Data Access Services
Research in the geosciences is typically based on the use of large,
rich data sets. Use of such data in Earth system science
educational applications is of such high pedagogical value that the
challenge of accessing and using such data is included as a DLESE core
activity.
DLESE began an initiative in this area by establishing the DAtaset
Working Group (DAWG). A workshop was held in February, 2001,
to organize a collaboration among some formidable partners to pursue
the challenges of tool development for data access and easy use in educational
applications. Proposers can see the results of this workshop
via www.dlese.org under "Find/Join
a Group."
Another important data initiative is the NSDL-sponsored Thematic Realtime
Environmental Data Distributed Services (THREDDS) project (www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/THREDDS/Overview.htm),
also a collaboration of numerous formidable partners. The
idea of THREDDS is that advances in the technologies of scientific data
management and digital libraries have made it in principle possible
to discover widely distributed data sets and to use subsets of data
with analysis tools to 1) visualize complex multidimensional data, 2)
integrate and overlay data from multiple sources, and 3) easily deal
with multiple coordinate systems, measurable quantities,
units, and sampling.
The present solicitation will not support development of data discovery
tools or applications per se, but rather is aimed at supporting
a service that will ensure that existing activities are actively pursued
and brought to DLESE in an organized manner. Specifically,
the activities of this service on behalf of the DLESE community will
include:
- Ongoing support for and organization of the efforts of the DAtaset
Working Group in pursuit of the goals established at the DAWG workshop.
- Close interaction with the THREDDS initiative--and other such initiatives--to
ensure full access via DLESE to the data discovery tools developed.
- Use of the DLESE Resource Cataloger to compile information on existing
tools, Web resources, and projects involving integrated access to
Earth data for educational purposes and applications of such data
in exemplary educational modules.
- Organization of workshops and other meetings that bring together
data providers, interface providers, and developers of educational
resources.
In short, the intent of this service is to be a catalyst in advancing
the frontier of use of "real" data in Earth system science education.
Proposers to this element may wish to consult the NSDL "Using Data
in the Classroom" Web site, usingdata.comm.nsdlib.org.
Evaluation Services
As DLESE evolves, it will be critically important to have ongoing measures
of its success, so that the service provided to the community can be
continually improved. This will involve use of metrics and
user feedback to evaluate how efficiently and effectively DLESE services
are being provided, but must also include analysis of the impact of
DLESE on improving student learning in Earth system science and the
degree to which DLESE is contributing to the important cause of educational
reform. The DLESE Community Plan identifies three key areas for evaluation:
community, dimensions (collections, access to data sets, a discovery
and distribution system, services for users, and communications networks),
and educational improvement. They will constitute the
basis for Evaluation Services activities.
The starting point for this element is the DLESE Evaluation Plan (www.dlese.org under
"Documents About DLESE/Plans"), which provides a strong platform
for proposers under this element to build on. The evaluation plan calls
for three types of evaluation work to judge the progress and achievements
across the three areas identified in the Community Plan:
-
Formative evaluation. This
involves action items to inform the development of the dimensions
of DLESE, such as:
-
Evaluating the impact of DLESE on science
education. DLESE expects to improve science learning by enabling
new teaching practices, access to rich resources for science learning
and support for inquiry-based learning. Impact evaluation will document
and represent usage, effectiveness and merit of DLESE for improved
science learning. Impact evaluation includes:
-
Evolution and engagement is
intended to build the capacity of the DLESE community to engage in
long-term and cohesive evaluation; this element calls for:
III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
The categories of proposers identified in the Grant
Proposal Guide are eligible to submit proposals under this program
announcement/solicitation.
IV. AWARD INFORMATION
V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
Full Proposal Instructions:
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement/solicitation
should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines
contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text
of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF Web Site at: http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpg.
Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse,
telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement/solicitation
number (02-158) in the program announcement/solicitation
block on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation.
Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant
proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may
delay processing.
Cost Sharing:
Cost Sharing is not required in proposals submitted under this Program
Solicitation.
C.
Due Dates
Proposals must be submitted by the following date(s):
Full Proposal Deadline(s) :
November 6, 2002
by 5:00 p.m. submitters local time
D. FastLane Requirements
Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this announcement/solicitation
through the FastLane system. Detailed instructions for proposal preparation
and submission via FastLane are available at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm.
For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188
or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The
FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the
use of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program
announcement/solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff
contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this announcement/solicitation.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized
Organizational Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal
Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter
II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications).
The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five
working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Proposers
are no longer required to provide a paper copy of the signed Proposal
Cover Sheet to NSF. Further instructions regarding this process are available
on the FastLane website at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov
VI. PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
A. NSF Proposal Review
Process
Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise
in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project.
These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight
of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest, at the time
of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. Care
is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer.
Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions,
minority-serving institutions, or adjacent disciplines to that principally
addressed in the proposal.
The two National Science Board approved merit review criteria are listed
below (see the Grant
Proposal Guide Chapter III.A for further information). The criteria
include considerations that help define them. These considerations are
suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers
must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address
only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered
and for which he/she is qualified to make judgements.
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding
within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is
the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate,
the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent
does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts?
How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient
access to resources?
What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting
teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity
broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity,
disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure
for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks,
and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance
scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of
the proposed activity to society?
NSF staff will give careful consideration to the following in making
funding decisions:
Integration of Research and Education
One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster
integration of research and education through the programs, projects,
and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These
institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently
assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where
all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement
of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives.
Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens
-- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities
-- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering.
NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to
the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.
Additional
Review Criteria
Additional criteria to be used in evaluating proposals submitted to
this competition are:
Do the proposed activities align with the guiding principles for the
DLESE Strategic Plan? Are the proposed activities likely
to expand and diversify the capabilities and numbers of users of and
contributors to DLESE? In the case of Collections Services,
will any educational resources produced under the proposed work be fully
compatible with DLESE Program Center guidelines
as expressed in the DLESE "Guide to Contributors and Federated Partners"? Does
the proposed budget include adequate funds and clear descriptions of
activities to work with other DLESE Core Services, including the DLESE Program Center?
B. Review Protocol and Associated Customer
Service Standard
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons
outside NSF who are experts in the particular field represented by the
proposal. Proposals submitted in response to this announcement/solicitation
will be reviewed by
Ad Hoc and/or panel review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support
or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's
review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted
by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents.
Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are
sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Director.
In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision
to award or decline funding.
NSF is striving to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals
have been declined or recommended for funding within six months for 70
percent of proposals. The time interval begins on the date of receipt.
The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's
recommendation.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals
recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and
Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications
and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers
are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments,
obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of
funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical
or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator
or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence
of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements
Officer does so at its own risk.
VII. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
A. Notification of the Award
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization
by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations
whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by
the cognizant NSF Program Division administering the program. Verbatim
copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be
provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See section VI.A.
for additional information on the review process.)
B. Award Conditions
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special
provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto;
(2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense,
on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific
approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal
referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such
as Grant General Conditions (NSF-GC-1); * or Federal Demonstration Partnership
(FDP) Terms and Conditions * and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance
that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative
agreement awards also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative
Agreement Terms and Conditions (CA-1). Electronic mail notification is
the preferred way to transmit NSF awards to organizations that have electronic
mail capabilities and have requested such notification from the Division
of Grants and Agreements.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Web site at
http://www.nsf.gov/home/grants/grants_gac.htm.
Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse,
telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained
in the NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, available electronically
on the NSF Web site at
http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpm. The GPM is also for sale through
the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington,
DC 20402. The telephone number at GPO for subscription information is
(202) 512-1800. The GPM may be ordered through the GPO Web site at http://www.gpo.gov.
Special Award Conditions:
C. Reporting Requirements
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants),
the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer
at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after the expiration
of an award, the PI also is required to submit a final project report.
Approximately 30 days before expiration, NSF will send a notice to remind
the PI of the requirement to file the final project report. Failure to
provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending
proposals for that PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required
reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
NSF has implemented an electronic project reporting system, available
through FastLane. This system permits electronic submission and updating
of project reports, including information on project participants (individual
and organizational), activities and findings, publications, and other
specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter
information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier
updates using the electronic system.
VIII. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:
- Michael A. Mayhew, Program Director, Division
of Earth Sciences, Education and Human Resources, 785 S, telephone:
(703) 292-8557, fax: (703) 292-9025, email: mmayhew@nsf.gov
For questions related to the use of FastLane,
contact:
- Brian E. Dawson, Information Technology
Specialist, 705 N, telephone: (703) 292-4727, fax: (703) 292-9042, email:
bdawson@nsf.gov
IX. OTHER PROGRAMS OF INTEREST
The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research
and education in science, mathematics, and engineering. The NSF Guide
to Programs is available electronically at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp.
General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility
information for proposal submission are provided in each chapter.
Many NSF programs offer announcements or solicitations concerning specific
proposal requirements. To obtain additional information about these requirements,
contact the appropriate NSF program offices. Any changes in NSF's fiscal
year programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs
will be announced in the NSF E-Bulletin, which is updated daily
on the NSF web site at http://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin,
and in individual program announcements/solicitations. Subscribers can
also sign up for NSF's Custom News Service (http://www.nsf.gov/home/cns/start.htm)
to be notified of new funding opportunities that become available.
ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in
most fields of science and engineering. Awardees are wholly responsible
for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for
publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such
findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and
educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities and persons
with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with
Federal statutes, regulations and NSF policies, no person on grounds of
race, color, age, sex, national origin or disability shall be excluded
from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF
(unless otherwise specified in the eligibility requirements for a particular
program).
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED)
provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons
with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research
assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the program announcement/solicitation
for further information.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD)
and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable
individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation
about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed
at (703) 292-5090, FIRS at 1-800-877-8339.
The National Science Foundation is committed to making all of the information
we publish easy to understand. If you have a suggestion about how to improve
the clarity of this document or other NSF-published materials, please
contact us at plainlanguage@nsf.gov.
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific
progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and
cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences,
mathematics, and engineering.
To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download
copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit
the NSF Web Site at http://www.nsf.gov
|
4201 Wilson Blvd.
Arlington, VA 22230 |
- For General Information
(NSF Information Center):
|
(703) 292-5111 |
- TDD (for the hearing-impaired):
|
(703) 292-5090 |
- To Order Publications or Forms:
|
|
Send an
e-mail to: |
pubs@nsf.gov |
or telephone: |
(301) 947-2722 |
|
(703) 292-5111 |
|
PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENTS
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited
under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as
amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection
with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by
awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the
Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed
to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review
process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data
regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration
of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers
and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government
agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order
to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party
in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a
party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer
file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers
or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal
Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register
267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated
Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the
information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information,
however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless
it displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this
collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including
the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden
estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, Division of Administrative Services, National Science Foundation,
Arlington, VA 22230, or to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for National Science Foundation (3145-0058),
725 17th Street, N.W. Room 10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.
OMB control number: 3145-0058.
|