Research on Gender in Science and Engineering FY 2005 (GSE)
Program Solicitation
|
National Science Foundation |
||
Preliminary Proposal Due Date(s) (required):
October 18, 2004
Research Proposals - Preliminary
January 06, 2005
Gender in S&E; Extension Service Proposals - Preliminary
Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
November 16, 2004
Dissemination Proposals
February 01, 2005
Research Full Proposals
April 22, 2005
Gender in S&E; Extension Service Full Proposals
April 22, 2005
Dissemination Proposals
The funding for Research and Dissemination is the same as FY 2004.
A new track is added for Gender in Science and Engineering Extension Services. The goal of the track is to support adaptation and implementation of evidence-based practices and the use of high quality information products already developed. It is assumed that the agents will serve a certain geographic region and specified communities within the region. They may have a specialization by content area (engineering or information technologies, for example) or by target population.
Proposals for GSE Extension Services will require a preliminary proposal.
The FY 2004 offering of Supplements to Integrate Research-Based Practices is not continued.
Program Title:
Research on Gender in Science and Engineering FY 2005 (GSE)
Synopsis of Program:
The program seeks to broaden the participation of girls and women in all fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education by supporting research, dissemination of research, and extension services in education that will lead to a larger and more diverse domestic science and engineering workforce. Typical projects will contribute to the knowledge base addressing gender-related differences in learning and in the educational experiences that affect student interest, performance, and choice of careers; and how pedagogical approaches and teaching styles, curriculum, student services, and institutional culture contribute to causing or closing gender gaps that persist in certain fields. Projects will disseminate and apply findings, evaluation results, and proven good practices and products.
The Research on Gender in Science and Engineering program has been funding these objectives since 1993, under the prior names "Program for Women and Girls" (PWG), "Program for Gender Equity in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology" (PGE), and "Gender Diversity in STEM Education" (GDSE).
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
Ruta P. Sevo, Program Director, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4676, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: rsevo@nsf.gov
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):
There is no organization limit for proposals to any of the tracks.
One of the National Science Foundation's (NSF) key strategic goals is to invest in People: "to enable the Foundation to meet its mission of promoting the progress of science, while facilitating the creation of a diverse, competitive, and globally-engaged U.S. workforce of scientists, engineers, technologists and well-prepared citizens." ( see http://www.nsf.gov/od/gpra/start.htm). Investments are directed at programs that strengthen scientific and engineering (S&E) research potential and education programs at all levels. These outcomes are essential to the Nation as we progress toward an increasingly technological job market and a scientifically complex society.
The Division of Human Resource Development (HRD) manages a portfolio of programs that aims to broaden the participation of traditionally underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) learning and in the STEM workforce. Programs are in place to address the learning, interest and participation of women, underrepresented minorities (African-American, Hispanic, Native American), and persons with disabilities, at all levels.
The program for Research on Gender in Science and Engineering seeks to build resources - developing the Nation's knowledge capital, social capital, and human capital -- toward the goal of broadening the participation of girls and young women in STEM education from kindergarten through undergraduate education.
A. ISSUES
Issues of concern underlying the need for the Program include:
Statistical profiles of STEM participation, with analyses, are documented in Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women (National Center for Education Statistics, U. S. Department of Education, NCES 2000-030) and the biannual publication Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (National Science Foundation, NSF 04-317) among others. (See http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/wmpd/start.htm.)
B. GOALS
The goal of Research on Gender in Science and Engineering (GSE) is to advance participation of women and girls in STEM fields where they continue to be underrepresented, in accord with NSF's goal of developing a diverse science and engineering workforce. In the context of that overarching goal, the GSE program supports activities that address the following types of objectives.
Research
Dissemination
Extension Services
The goals of the GSE program, which originated in 1993 under the name "Program for Women and Girls" (PWG), parallel those of many other education and diversity programs at NSF except that they emphasize gender aspects.
C. DESCRIPTION - RESEARCH PROPOSALS
Proposals in the Research area may seek to enhance the multidisciplinary understanding of STEM learning to the extent that differences are evident based on gender. Behavioral, cognitive, affective, and social differences may be investigated using methods of sociology, psychology, anthropology, economics, and statistics disciplines.
Successful proposals will incorporate relevant advances in research methodologies and theoretical models. They should capitalize on the development of new instrumental, computational or statistical methods, models, and tools of observation and analysis.
Proposals for research projects should include testable hypotheses and carry the expectation that the results obtained will be of sufficient significance to merit peer review and publication. They should present the disciplinary and conceptual framework for the study. If a population sample is used, the proposal should describe the sample, rationale for sample selection, and the project's access to the sample population. The proposal should address whether the design is premised on special needs and interests due to educational level, race, ethnicity, economic status, or disability, in addition to gender, and to what extent data will be disaggregated for multiple characteristics.
The effort should provide a research foundation for educational approaches, curriculum, and technological tools that are already developed or can be developed in the future, bridging research and educational practice in settings such as classrooms, informal learning sites, and technological learning environments. The research foundation is assumed to provide a strong base of support for sustained improvement in STEM educational practice. Strong research designs will produce rigorous, cumulative, reproducible, and usable findings.
Investigators might:
Research proposals should address dissemination of findings to a national audience, particularly to education practitioners. Since the goal of the program is to contribute to a national knowledge base, it is important to show that the investigator is aware of appropriate channels -- specific peer-reviewed journals, publications, web sites, professional association conferences -- and is committed (including allocating resources) to make sure that the investment in the project leads to this contribution and that peers in the community will benefit.
D. DESCRIPTION - DISSEMINATION PROPOSALS
Dissemination projects provide a mechanism for informing a wider audience about issues, research findings, and strategies for changing educational practice. Proposals for dissemination must justify a significant investment to reach a regional audience or national attention.
Investigators might:
Outcomes. Dissemination proposals should address how they will assess whether the method and content were successful, and budget for some assessment. Examples of measures are:
E. DESCRIPTION - GENDER IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING EXTENSION SERVICES PROPOSALS
Extension Services will offer proactive dissemination, consulting, implementation assistance, and reporting on experience in the field. They will be a conduit for understanding of research and for adoption of research-based approaches on the participation of women in science and engineering.
The Services will concentrate access to the knowledge base so that they provide expert knowledge. They will integrate various findings into a unified program of change, and communicate it in simple language to educators within a specified region. The word “Center” is intentionally not used, so as to indicate that the “Services” must meet the business standards of the best customer services: proactive, responsive, quality, timely, customized for educators in the region, and informed by feedback. (Cf. Wilson & Daviss, 1994, pp. 17-20)
“Proactive” means that there is an explicit, communicated, ambitious plan for leading change. The plan should be developed following business best practices, for example, involving the customer. The “quality” aspect means that the services will show sophistication and credibility in advancing “a unified program of change.” They will utilize the latest peer-reviewed research and draw on the knowledge of researchers who have produced the knowledge base. “Responsive” means the services understand educators and methods of effective professional development of educators. “Customized” means that the services are in touch with the culture of the regional community and take advantage of opportunities and other resources unique to the region. “Informed by feedback” means the services are evaluated and improved continuously.
Investigators might:
The target community may be a mix of teachers, counselors, parents, community leaders, administrators, faculty, and others. (Since the aim of the services is to change educational systems, direct services to students are not in scope.) The target community should be described, especially if the design of the services is premised on special needs and interests based on educational level, race, ethnicity, economic status, and disability, in addition to gender.
Dissemination. The Extension Services have a strong mandate to disseminate information to a regional community. In addition, there should be some plans to network with other educational improvement efforts and professional associations.
Outcome Measures. The goal of the Extension Services is not to prove a new model for dissemination or implementation. In the spirit of good management they should address methods for collecting formative feedback and for evaluating and reporting on the success of the services.
Summary of Key Characteristics. Extension Services are characteristically different from the other tracks in the following ways:
F. REFERENCES
American Association of University Women (2000). Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. See www.aauw.org
American Association of University Women (2004). Under the Microscope: a Decade of Gender Equity Projects in the Sciences.
Building Engineering and Science Talent (2004). A Bridge for All: Higher Education Design Principles to Broaden Participation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. See www.bestworkforce.org
Campbell, Patricia B., Eric Jolly, Lesli Hoey, Lesley K. Perman (2002). Upping the Numbers: Using Research-Based Decision Making to Increase Diversity in the Quantitative Disciplines. Commissioned by the GE Fund, January, 2002. Available at www.edc.org/spotlight/equity/upping.htm
Clewell, Beatriz Chu, Bernice Taylor Anderson, Margaret E. Thorpe (1992). Breaking the Barriers: Helping Female and Minority Students Succeed in Mathematics and Science. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Clewell, B.C., & Campbell, P.B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we've been, where we are, where we're going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3-4), 255-284. See www.campbell-kibler.com
Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering (2002). Biennial Report to the United States Congress. See www.nsf.gov/od/ceose
Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Develoment (September 2000). Land of Plenty, Diversity as America's Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology. See www.nsf.gov/od/cawmset
Darke, Katherine, Beatriz Clewell, and Ruta Sevo (2002). Meeting the Challenge: The Impact of the National Science Foundation's Program for Women and Girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3&4), 285-303.
Davis, Cinda-Sue, Angela Ginorio, Carol Hollenshead, Barbara Lazarus, Paula Rayman, et al (1996). The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Dietz, James S., Bernice Anderson, and Conrad Katzenmeyer (2002). Women and the Crossroads of Science: Thoughts on Policy, Research, and Evaluation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3&4), 395-408.
Ginorio, Angela and Michelle Huston (2001). Si, Se Puede! Yes, We Can: Latinas in School. AAUW Education Foundation. See www.aauw.org
Margolis, Jane and Allan Fisher (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2000). Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. NCES 2000-601 See nces.ed.gov
National Center for Educational Statistics (2000). Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women. NCES 2000-030
National Council for Research on Women (2001). Balancing the Equation: Where Are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering and Technology? Written by Mary Thom. See www.ncrw.org
National Science Foundation (2003). New Formulas for America's Workforce: girls in science and engineering. Arlington, VA, 2003 (NSF 03-207 printed book, NSF 03-208 brochure+CD) See www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/hrd/pge.asp
Wilson, Kenneth G. and Bennett Daviss (1994). Redesigning Education.
G. INFORMATION ABOUT PREVIOUS AWARDS
HRD's web site provides links to abstracts for and other information about awards made by this program under prior names (http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/hrd/). Historically, the program has been called "Program for Women and Girls" (PWG), "Program for Gender Equity in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology" (PGE), and "Gender Diversity in STEM Education" (GDSE).
NSF's web site provides the ability to search awards using custom queries ( http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/index.jsp). To retrieve only GSE-related awards, use the query:
To find more specific awards, it is possible to narrow the search:
A compendium of profiles of projects funded in the first decade of the program, with a comprehensive index, is available as a printed book, CD-ROM, and, as an online PDF file. It may be accessed at http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/hrd/pge.asp , or, http://www.nsf.gov/pubsys/ods/ using one of the publication numbers:
National Science Foundation (2003). New Formulas for America's Workforce: Girls in Science and Engineering. Arlington, VA, 2003 (NSF 03-207 printed book, NSF 03-208 brochure+CD)
The categories of proposers identified in the Grant Proposal Guide are eligible to submit proposals under this program announcement/solicitation.
Anticipated funding for new grants in all tracks in FY 2005 is $6,000,000 pending the availability of funds.
Research proposals may request up to $500,000 for up to three years, pending availability of funds. The proposal should include a budget for each year and a summary budget if there are multiple years. (Awards may be fully funded in the first year.)
Dissemination proposals may request up to $200,000 for up to 24 months, pending availability of funds.
Gender in Science and Engineering Extension Services proposals may request up to $500,000 each year for five years, pending availability of funds. Continued funding in years four and five are contingent on performance. Funding will be cut if performance is not satisfactory.
NSF expects to fund 10 Research proposals, 10 Dissemination proposals, and 2 Extension Services proposals, depending on the quality of the submissions and availability of funds.
The proposed start dates should be at least seven months from the full proposal deadline.
Funds should be budgeted for the principal investigator to attend a two-day grantees' meeting in the Washington, D.C. area, each award year (February/March time frame).
A limited equipment request (<10% of total budget) is allowed for projects intensive in educational technology, for development. Equipment for participants in student or educator demonstration programs, and office equipment for project staff are expected to come from other sources.
GSE research projects are eligible for REU (Research Experiences for Undergraduates) supplements, which expressly support the participation of undergraduate students on the project research team, if funds are available. Please see the REU announcement for complete parameters and the method for making a request for an REU supplement (see http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/reu/start.htm). Proposers should consult the Program Director in advance of a request for REU supplements.
Preliminary Proposals
(required):
A preliminary proposal is applicable for Research and GSE Extension Services proposals. It is required prior to the submission of a full proposal. It will be reviewed by NSF staff and/or external reviewers to provide input for developing a full proposal. A full proposal will be Encouraged or Discouraged based on the review of the preliminary.
The preliminary proposal must be submitted via Fastlane.
Cover Sheet: Be sure to check the PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL box. Select the program name "Research on Gender in Science and Engineering" in the Education and Human Resources Directorate, Human Resource Development.
PROJECT SUMMARY: A short abstract (one page or less, single spaced) that clearly identifies the major features of the project. Address each NSF criterion separately: intellectual merit and broader impacts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The narrative is limited to 5 pages in length. It should sketch, in broad terms, the essential features of the project:
RESEARCH
GSE EXTENSION SERVICES
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH of the PI and co-PI's is required. No budget pages are required; a requested total amount on the cover sheet is sufficient. Supplemental materials or appendices are NOT permitted for preliminary proposals.
Full Proposal Instructions:
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement/solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF Website at: http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpg. Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
The following instructions supplement the GPG guidelines for full proposals.
FULL PROPOSALS
On the COVER SHEET, select the program name "Research on Gender in Science and Engineering" in the Education and Human Resources Directorate, Human Resource Development.
The TITLE should be prefaced with an abbreviation identifying the GSE goal supported by the proposal:
The PROJECT SUMMARY should:
The Research PROJECT DESCRIPTION should address:
Common weaknesses in research proposals (according to Dietz, et al, 2002) are:
The Dissemination PROJECT DESCRIPTION should address:
The Extension Services PROJECT DESCRIPTION should address:
Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement/solicitation number (04-608) in the program announcement/solicitation block on the proposal Cover Sheet. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
Cost Sharing:
Cost sharing is not required in proposals submitted under this Program Solicitation.
Other Budgetary Limitations:
Research budgets may be up to $500,000.
Dissemination budgets may be up to $200,000.
GSE Extension Services budgets may be up to $2,500,000.
Funds should be budgeted for the principal investigator or a project member to attend a two-day grantees' meeting in the Washington, D.C. area, each award year, in February/March. A limited equipment request (<10% of total budget) may be allowed. (See Section IV.)
Proposals must be submitted by the following date(s):
Preliminary Proposals
(required):
Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this announcement/solicitation through the FastLane system. Detailed instructions for proposal preparation and submission via FastLane are available at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program announcement/solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this announcement/solicitation.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications). The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Proposers are no longer required to provide a paper copy of the signed Proposal Cover Sheet to NSF. Further instructions regarding this process are available on the FastLane Website at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov
Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest, at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority-serving institutions, or adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal.
The National Science Board approved revised criteria for evaluating proposals at its meeting on March 28, 1997 (NSB 97-72). All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.
On July 8, 2002, the NSF Director issued Important Notice 127, Implementation of new Grant Proposal Guide Requirements Related to the Broader Impacts Criterion. This Important Notice reinforces the importance of addressing both criteria in the preparation and review of all proposals submitted to NSF. NSF continues to strengthen its internal processes to ensure that both of the merit review criteria are addressed when making funding decisions.
In an effort to increase compliance with these requirements, the January 2002 issuance of the GPG incorporated revised proposal preparation guidelines relating to the development of the Project Summary and Project Description. Chapter II of the GPG specifies that Principal Investigators (PIs) must address both merit review criteria in separate statements within the one-page Project Summary. This chapter also reiterates that broader impacts resulting from the proposed project must be addressed in the Project Description and described as an integral part of the narrative.
Effective October 1, 2002, NSF will return without review proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria within the Project Summary. It is believed that these changes to NSF proposal preparation and processing guidelines will more clearly articulate the importance of broader impacts to NSF-funded projects.
The two National Science Board approved merit review criteria are listed below (see the Grant Proposal Guide Chapter III.A for further information). The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which he/she is qualified to make judgments.
NSF staff will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions:
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal. Proposals submitted in response to this announcement/solicitation will be reviewed by Panel Review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Director. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.
In most cases, proposers will be contacted by the Program Officer after his or her recommendation to award or decline funding has been approved by the Division Director. This informal notification is not a guarantee of an eventual award.
NSF is striving to be able to tell proposers whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on the closing date of an announcement/solicitation, or the date of proposal receipt, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program Division administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See section VI.A. for additional information on the review process.)
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (NSF-GC-1); * or Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Terms and Conditions * and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative agreement awards also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions (CA-1). Electronic mail notification is the preferred way to transmit NSF awards to organizations that have electronic mail capabilities and have requested such notification from the Division of Grants and Agreements.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at http://www.nsf.gov/home/grants/grants_gac.htm. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in the NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, available electronically on the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpm. The GPM is also for sale through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402. The telephone number at GPO for subscription information is (202) 512-1800. The GPM may be ordered through the GPO Website at http://www.gpo.gov.
Special Award Conditions:
GSE Extension Services awards will be made for up to five years. Funding for years four and five is contingent on performance, as evaluated from annual reports and site visit reports. If performance is not satisfactory, then funding will be cut.
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Within 90 days after the expiration of an award, the PI also is required to submit a final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for the PI and all Co-PIs. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project reporting system, available through FastLane, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. This system permits electronic submission and updating of project reports, including information on project participants (individual and organizational), activities and findings, publications, and other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system.
General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:
Ruta P. Sevo, Program Director, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4676, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: rsevo@nsf.gov
For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact:
Gloria Strothers, Lead Program Assistant, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4718, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: gstrothe@nsf.gov
Toni Edquist, Program Assistant, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4649, email: tedquist@nsf.gov
Victoria A. Smoot, Program Specialist, Directorate for Education & Human Resources, Division of Human Resource Development, 815 N, telephone: (703) 292-4677, fax: (703) 292-9018, email: vsmoot@nsf.gov
The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research and education in science, mathematics, and engineering. The NSF Guide to Programs is available electronically at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp. General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information for proposal submission are provided in each chapter.
Many NSF programs offer announcements or solicitations concerning specific proposal requirements. To obtain additional information about these requirements, contact the appropriate NSF program offices. Any changes in NSF's fiscal year programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs will be announced in the NSF E-Bulletin, which is updated daily on the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin, and in individual program announcements/solicitations. Subscribers can also sign up for NSF's Custom News Service (http://www.nsf.gov/home/cns/start.htm) to be notified of new funding opportunities that become available.
Research on Gender in Science and Engineering is among NSF education programs, and among programs that promote the participation of under-represented groups. For a complete list of programs in Education and Human Resources see http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/. For a complete list of programs in the Division for Human Resource Development see http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/hrd/. Most of the programs listed below potentially support special emphasis on gender, minority, and disability issues. Some are funding projects like those funded by this program in the past.
Curriculum
Teacher Preparation
Informal Education
Technology/IT
Research
Engineering
Mathematics
Addressing Under-representation
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. Awardees are wholly responsible for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities and persons with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and NSF policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF, although some programs may have special requirements that limit eligibility.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the GPG Chapter II, Section D.2 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov
|
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, Division of Administrative Services, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230.
OMB control number: 3145-0058.
nsf.gov |
| About NSF | Funding | Publications | News & Media | Search | Site Map | Help | |
The National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA Tel: 703-292-5111, FIRS: 800-877-8339 | TDD: 800-281-8749 |
Policies Contact NSF Customize |