|
SOUTH CAROLINA PROBLEM IDENTIFICATIONThe South Carolina Department of Education, Office of Transportation, is responsible for training, testing, and licensing all public school bus drivers. Several years ago, most of the state’s school bus drivers were 16, 17, and 18 year-old students. The school bus drivers’ training curriculum, training methodology, training aids and materials were designed to accommodate the learning styles of this age group. After April 1, 1988, the state was mandated to discontinue using teenagers as school bus drivers. Since that time, the entire school bus driving force has been converted to an all-adult driving force; however, the school bus driver’s training course and training methodology have not changed to accommodate the adult learner. Furthermore, the current curriculum does not address issues related to Commercial Driver License (CDL) requirements. The Office of Transportation needs a revised and expanded curriculum that addresses new statutes and issues surrounding today’s bus drivers. GOALS AND OBJECTIVESThe primary goal of this project was to reduce school bus crashes by five percent by the end of the grant period. The Office of Transportation would develop and implement a comprehensive curriculum and training plan that highlighted defensive driving strategies and commercial vehicle safety techniques for the state’s school bus drivers. The new curriculum would include:
STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIESThe new bus driver-training curriculum required a collaborative effort by the Department of Education’s Office of Transportation, curriculum developers from the Greenville County School District, and local transportation officials. This curriculum was based in part on the subject matter expertise of all of the participants in the consortium. The Greenville County School District researched and developed a revised school bus driver curriculum. The Department of Education established a Project Advisory Committee, comprised of persons with traffic safety expertise to assist in developing the overall direction of the curriculum. Committee members also made recommendations about the content and design, support materials, and presentation methodology. RESULTSThe new training brought tremendous results during FY 1999.
|