Bicycle Helmet Blitz Program |
PENNSYLVANIA |
|
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
During 1995, 830 bicyclists accounted
for 2 percent of all traffic fatalities nationally. Although 70 to 80 percent
of bicycle fatalities involved head injuries (one-third of victims were
between 5- and 15-years-old), only 10 to 15 percent of bicyclists used a
helmet. Montgomery County, Pennsylvania statistics mirrored these national
data in 1994, reporting 49 bicyclists hospitalized for bicycle-related injuries
and 36 percent of young bicyclists never using a helmet. Although Pennsylvania
law requires bicycle helmet use by all bicyclists below 12-years-old, statistics
clearly indicated a problem.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The goal of the Bicycle Helmet Blitz Program was to reduce injuries and
fatalities resulting from bicycle-related traffic crashes. A program was
designed to meet this goal aided by the following objectives:
STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES
The Bicycle Helmet Blitz Program was initiated in 1997 through the collaborative
efforts of the Montgomery County Health Department and local police departments
within the county. The Highway Safety Specialist from the Health Department's
Highway Safety Program patrolled in a police car with a uniformed police
officer in areas where bicyclists frequently rode. All bicyclists (including
adult bicyclists) were stopped and educated about bicycle safety. Children
wearing a helmet were praised for their safety awareness, and given a water
bottle as positive reinforcement.
Bicyclists under the age of 12 who were not
wearing a helmet, were educated about the law and the need for protection.
In blitz areas where younger children were riding close to home, the Health
Department and officers frequently found an opportunity to educate the parents
as well as the children. Bicyclists were sent on their way with bicycle
safety information and the water bottles in a small plastic litter bag designed
to be hung on the handle bars of the bicycle.
The Bicycle Helmet Blitz Program was implemented in four local communities
during the summer of 1997. With each bicycle stopped during a blitz, the
following information was collected: bicyclist age, gender, and race; use
or non-use of a helmet at time of the blitz; self- reported reason for non-use
of a helmet; ownership of a helmet; and the specific location of the event.
These responses were synthesized and analyzed to determine factors that
may indicate reasons for non-compliance with the helmet law, which could
ultimately aid in developing strategies for strengthening compliance.
RESULTS Ownership of a helmet did not appear to assure use. Forty-four percent of bicyclists not wearing a helmet reported owning a helmet. The most commonly reported reason for not wearing a helmet among this group was that it had been left at home. Other reasons included outgrowing a helmet and not replacing it, the economic cost of purchasing a helmet, riding close to home (the perception being that the closer to home, the safer one becomes), and appearance/comfort. Teenage bicyclists claimed that wearing a helmet was not only uncomfortable, but did not fit with their image. It is anticipated that the high visibility of the program will significantly contribute to meeting the goal of reduction of bicycle-related fatalities and injuries. |
|
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration | Winter 1998 |