|
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATIONUntil 1996, there was little or no coordinated statewide training between law enforcement officers and prosecuting attorneys. Additionally, officers and prosecuting attorneys were not taught about the issues that faced each other’s discipline. For example, prosecuting attorneys did not understand the technical aspects of an investigation, such as accident reconstruction and toxicology. Conversely, law enforcement officers had little contact with the legal aspects of a case and the impact an investigation would have on those legal issues. GOALS AND OBJECTIVESThe goal of the Driving While Under the Influence (DWI) Trial Advocacy Training program was to increase the number of successful investigations and prosecutions of DWI/Vehicular homicide. There are two components to the program, each with it’s own program objective:
STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIESDWI/Vehicular Homicide Conference – Columbia, Missouri
Lethal Weapon Trial School – Kansas City, Missouri
|
RESULTSDWI/Vehicular Homicide ConferenceApproximately 130 participants attended this conference (78 law enforcement officers, 41 prosecutors and staff, 9 DOR attorneys, and 2 others) from over 66 jurisdictions statewide, as well as the Missouri State Highway Patrol. Training concentrated on multidisciplinary efforts within the counties and participants were encouraged to communicate with various disciplines not represented in their counties to enhance investigations and prosecutions. Lethal Weapon Homicide CourseStudents received two full days of training on specific accident reconstruction and toxicology formulas and techniques. They attended one and one-half days of lab classes in which they actually cross-examined accident reconstructionists and toxicologists, and were critiqued by experienced trial attorneys. Comments indicated that the biggest benefits of teaching such technical information to attorneys were the ability to understand and analyze investigation reports, to better question experts in the field, and to give feedback to investigators regarding the need to conduct certain investigations. Consensus was that this was an excellent course that taught prosecutors and assistants difficult concepts in an understandable way. |
|
|
WINTER 2002 |