|
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATIONAiken County, located in the midwest region of South Carolina, is the state’s second largest county with a population of 133,000. The county is home to major industry, as well as many high profile cultural events, and an interstate system that runs the length of the county. Over the past three years, Aiken County has experienced a dramatic increase in traffic crashes and fatalities, reaching a record high of 50 fatalities in 1998. During that same year, alcohol or drugs were probable causes in 143 crashes resulting in six deaths and 98 injuries. Speed accounted for 32 percent of reported crashes. Prior to the grant award, traffic enforcement was virtually non-existent and there weren’t any proactive traffic safety programs in the unincorporated areas because of manpower restraints. Aiken County needed aggressive educational programs and increased enforcement levels in order to reduce the number of traffic crashes. GOALS AND OBJECTIVESThe goals of the Alcohol Enforcement Program are to:
STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIESTo combat the high number of traffic crashes in Aiken County, a three person Traffic Enforcement Unit (TEU) was formed to provide proactive traffic enforcement throughout the county. Officers received training that helped them in their enforcement efforts while detecting, apprehending, and prosecuting impaired drivers were the primary focus of the unit. After reviewing crash data, the TEU determined target areas for selective and aggressive traffic enforcement. In order to educate the public about the dangers of drinking and driving, the TEU planned and conducted presentations for several different groups including schools, churches, and businesses. The TEU also conducted special enforcement activities and DUI-related activities throughout the grant period. The media was contacted regularly to keep the public informed about the efforts of the Alcohol Enforcement Program. |
RESULTSUpon receipt of the grant award, the Aiken County Sheriff’s Office initially encountered opposition from the citizens and county government. However, the media was very receptive to the program and offered positive coverage, which helped to gain the public’s support.
|
|
|
WINTER 2002 |