December 19, 2001
For more information on these science news and feature
story tips, please contact the public information
officer at the end of each item at (703) 292-8070.
Editor: Peter West
Contents of this News Tip:
The fragmenting of habitats worldwide may be more devastating
than scientists thought. Fragments are widely considered
to be inferior to intact habitats because they are
more likely to lose species. But new research shows
that fragments are also more vulnerable to hunting,
fires, drought and other kinds of ecological stress.
"Such negative synergisms potentially could be one
of the most important, and least understood, aspects
of the modern environmental crisis," according to
William Laurance of the Smithsonian Tropical Research
Institute in Balboa, Panama.
Laurance and his colleagues published a five-paper
special section on habitat fragmentation in the December
issue of the journal Conservation Biology.
His work was funded by the National Science Foundation
(NSF).
Laurance notes, for example, that fragmentation of
the Amazon forest makes it more susceptible to damage
from droughts caused by the phenomenon known as El
Niņo. During the 1997 droughts, trees near fragment
edges were 50 percent more likely to die than trees
in the interior. These fragments are already particularly
vulnerable to fire because they have dry edges and
often adjoin cattle pastures, which are burned regularly.
Global climate change could make Amazon forest fragments
even more vulnerable to fire by exacerbating the periodic
droughts, Laurance says. [Cheryl Dybas]
Top of Page
The National Center for Supercomputing Applications
(NCSA) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
and Russia's Kurchatov Institute have chosen an independent
vendor to develop a high-performance computer network
connection that will give the two nations' scientific
communities unprecedented access to each other and
facilitate joint scientific and educational projects.
The link, called FASTnet (For Advanced Science and
Technology Network), is funded in part by a $2 million
NSF grant. Russian support for the link is from the
Russian Ministry of Industry, Science and Technology.
Teleglobe, a worldwide networking company, was chosen
to develop the link.
The 155 megabit-per-second FASTnet will increase the
bandwidth between the U.S. and Russia by orders of
magnitude and will facilitate communications through
high quality video-conferencing that has never been
possible on such a wide basis between the U.S. and
Russian scientists.
"FASTnet represents a new level of communication infrastructure
between the U.S. and Russia and it introduces new
possibilities for collaboration and cooperative work,"
said Dan Reed, director of NCSA and the National Computational
Science Alliance. "The primary purpose of this network
infrastructure is to enable scientists in both countries
to explore new research opportunities in a variety
of disciplines."
Among those are joint responses to natural and man-made
disasters, safeguards of nuclear material, better
understanding of the human genome, joint exploration
of space, distributed monitoring of seismic events,
high energy physics collaborations and atmospheric
and other environmental studies and simulations. [Tom
Garritano]
Top of Page
After more than 13 years, NSF's IBM mainframe computer
-- the workhorse of NSF proposal, grant and financial
processing - has been put out to pasture.
It took three years to deploy new applications for
the client-server/local area network that replaced
the mainframe. Now all users and corporate application
processes are off the IBM Mainframe. The official
"retirement" occurred in late October 2001 when the
mainframe was physically powered down. It was removed
from the building in early December.
"This transition is symbolic of ongoing changes at
NSF," said Al Charity, the chief of NSF's infrastructure
management branch. "When NSF initiated FastLane in
1995, we set the standard for federal agencies to
conduct electronic business with their customers.
But good customer service calls for constant monitoring
and improvement of the [Information Technology] architecture
and business processes. This upgrade is part of both.
The move off the IBM Mainframe positions our IT architecture
to take advantage of emerging technologies and to
pursue goals identified within our five-year IT Plan."
[Mary Hanson]
Top of Page
|