Assessing Fundamental Science: IV. Concluding Points
IV. Concluding Points
- The passage of GPRA offers scientists and science managers the
opportunity to adapt the best planning and management methods
to build world-class science programs and to share the significance
and excitement of the discoveries made by these programs with
policy makers and with the public.
- The cornerstone of the effort to build world-class science will
continue to be merit review with peer evaluation. This will assure
the excellence of agency programs and their contribution to the
leadership status of the United States.
- The science community is actively working to develop the measurement
tools and other methods needed to assess and communicate the many
contributions of fundamental science to national well being--when
the necessary enabling conditions are present.
- Currently, existing data and methods capture only a subset of
the spectrum of research outputs and outcomes. The creative and
dynamic nature of the science enterprise means that existing methods
developed in more conventional contexts will understate the total
productivity of any fundamental science program because the total
long-term pay-off from eventual applications of new fundamental
knowledge is never immediately known.
- The science agencies have launched an evolutionary process to
develop better methods. As anticipated in GPRA, some period of
experimentation and special studies will be required. The pilot
projects now underway and other agency efforts, current and future,
will yield new methods for assessing the results of agency programs.