Table 32.
Comparison of Energy Consumption, Gross Domestic Product, and Energy Intensity
Results
for EIA and Five-Lab Study Analyses
Projection |
1990 |
1996 |
2010 |
|||||
Five-Lab Study |
EIA |
|||||||
Business as Usual |
50 HE/LC |
Reference |
1990+24% |
1990+9% |
1990+9% |
|||
Energy Use by Sector |
||||||||
Buildings |
29.8 | 34.3 | 36.0 | 32.0 | 38.6 | 36.1 | 32.2 | 33.3 |
Industrial | 31.4 | 34.6 | 37.4 | 33.6 | 40.0 | 38.5 | 36.9 | 34.6 |
Transportation | 22.7 | 24.9 | 32.3 | 27.8 | 32.6 | 31.9 | 30.5 | 29.8 |
Total | 83.9 | 93.8 | 105.7 | 93.4 | 111.2 | 106.5 | 99.6 | 97.7 |
Gross Domestic Product | ||||||||
Billion 1992 Chain-Weighted Dollars | 6,139 | 6,928 | 9,185 | 9,185 | 9,429 | 9,333 | 9,241 | 9,277a |
Change
From Reference Projection (Percent) |
| | | 0.0 | | -1.0 | -2.0 | -1.65 |
Energy Intensity | ||||||||
Thousand Btu per Dollar of GDP | 13.67 | 13.54 | 11.51 | 10.17 | 11.79 | 11.42 | 10.78 | 10.54a |
Annual Percent Change, 1996-2010 | | | -1.2 | -2.0 | -1.0 | -1.25 | -1.65 | -1.78 |
aThe GDP and intensity values are approximations derived without using the full DRI
model. = not applicable. Sources: Five-Lab StudyInterlaboratory Working Group on Energy-Efficient and Low-Carbon Technologies, Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions: Potential Impacts of Energy-Efficient and Low Carbon Technologies by 2010 and Beyond (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and Argonne National Laboratory, September 1997), Table 1.1. EIANational Energy Modeling System, runs KYBASE.D080398A, FD24ABV.D080398B, FD09ABV.D080398B, and HITECH09.D080498B. |