Dr. Joseph Bordogna
Deputy Director
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Tennessee Valley Corridor Economic Summit 2000
Cannon Caucus Room (345 Cannon HOB)
May 29, 2001
See also slide presentation.
If you're interested in reproducing any of the slides,
please contact
The Office of Legislative and Public Affairs: (703)
292-8070.
Good afternoon to all of you. I'm delighted to be here
today to talk about the National Science Foundation's
research and education priorities for the coming fiscal
year. Thanks to Congressman Zack Wamp, Congressman
Bud Cramer, and Congressman Van Hillary for hosting
this summit and to Tom Ballard for his good work with
the Tennessee Valley Corridor.
I've been asked to say a few words about how NSF fits
into the overall context for science and engineering
- and what are some of the major challenges we see.
I hope to pull these two threads together, because
today, the context for science and engineering shapes
the challenges and opportunities that lie before us.
What do I mean? Consider that today's terascale computing
systems give us 2 to 3 orders of magnitude more computing
power than we've ever had before. At the same time,
advances in nanoscale science and engineering give
us the ability to manipulate matter and build machines
that are 3 orders of magnitude smaller than ever before.
This means one thing: the future will not look like
the past. We can't predict what it will look like,
but it's our job collectively to lay the foundation
today for these future achievements and opportunities.
The National Science Foundation aims at nothing less
than U.S. world leadership in science, engineering,
and technology. That's what we're about, and our budget
priorities reflect that mission - in both research
and education, and their integration.
[NSF Vision Statement]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
I want to set my remarks within the context of the
NSF vision statement. It's direct and crisp."
"Enabling the nation's future through discovery, learning,
and innovation."
Not too long ago, the vision statement would have focused
only on discovery. Now we include learning and innovation
on an equal footing. The boundaries that once separated
discovery, learning, and innovation are known now
not to be as distinct as they once were thought to
be. There is a more forthright coupling among them,
and constant interaction.
[NSF Outcome Goals: People,
Ideas, Tools]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
We've developed a new set of goals to complement the
new NSF vision, a sharply focused set on which we
can focus our investments, and by which we can be
held accountable. We call these People, Ideas, and
Tools.
You'll notice that People are at the top of the list.
That's intentional. NSF is as much about building
a world-class workforce as it is about discovery.
We're putting a renewed focus on preparing the science,
engineering and technology workforce.
Knowledge workers - scientists, mathematicians, engineers,
educators - will be in increasingly high demand. Other
nations know this: A 24-year-old in Japan is three
times more likely to hold a bachelor's degree in engineering
than one in the U.S.
Of course, Ideas, the new knowledge that is powering
innovation and productivity in our economy today,
will always be central to everything NSF does. And,
finally, we need sophisticated Tools to advance the
frontiers in nearly every field.
[NSF Core Strategies]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
We've adopted three core strategies to accomplish these
goals. These are: develop intellectual capital, integrate
research and education, and promote partnerships.
This is where the rubber hits the road. It's where
we design the solutions to get the job done effectively.
I've taken this jaunt through NSF planning territory
for a reason. As I give you the details of the NSF
FY 2002 budget request, I'd like you to keep NSF's
vision, goals and strategies in mind. We try to use
the budget resources we have in a thoughtful and strategic
way to realize our objectives.
Now, on to the budget.
[NSF Budget Request by
Appropriation]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
Here's the bottom line. NSF is requesting a total of
$4.47 billion. Funding levels for each of NSF's appropriation
accounts at the FY 2002 Request and FY 2001 Current
Plan levels are shown in this chart.
I'll move right to the top priorities in NSF's budget
request for FY 2002.
[Science & Math Partnerships]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
At the center of NSF's budget request is an initial
$200 million dollar downpayment on a five year, $1
billion dollar investment K-12 science and math education.
The President has asked NSF to lead the Math and Science
Partnerships program as part of the No Child Left
Behind education initiative. NSF will fund states
and local school districts to join with institutions
of higher education.
This program aims to strengthen math and science standards,
improve curricula and textbooks, and raise the quality
of teacher professional development.
[Graduate student stipends]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
We're also placing a special focus on graduate student
stipends. A recent study found that 57 percent of
bachelor's degree recipients did not apply to science
and engineering graduate programs for financial reasons.
The average stipend for graduate students in these
fields is less than half the average wage for those
who start working as soon as they receive their undergraduate
degrees.
The budget includes $8 million dollars to increase
graduate stipends for Fellows in a number of NSF programs.
The stipends would increase from $18,000 to $20,500.
That's a good beginning, but we want to see this figure
increase even more in the near years ahead, perhaps
on the order of $25 to $30 thousand dollars.
[Interdisciplinary Mathematics]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
Now, let me move on to NSF's $20 million dollar Interdisciplinary
Mathematics program. It's the centerpiece of our core
investments in FY 2002. The program aims to strengthen
fundamental research in mathematics, and at the same
time enhance its contributions to other fields.
[Priority Areas]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
We're also continuing to support key emerging capabilities.
These are priority areas that hold exceptional promise
to advance knowledge. The FY 2002 budget focuses on
four of these.
First is Biocomplexity in the Environment. The term
"biocomplexity" refers to the dynamic web of relationships
that arise when living things at all levels - from
cells to ecosystems - interact with their environment,
both natural and human-made.
Second is Information Technology Research. NSF funding
will deepen fundamental research on software, networking,
scalability and communications that will take us to
the next generation of applications.
The third priority area is Nanoscale Science and Engineering.
If IT can give us the capability to do things three
orders of magnitude faster, nanotechnology will let
us work on a scale three orders of magnitude smaller.
The final priority area I'll mention is a group of
related activities we call Learning for the 21st Century.
There's been tremendous progress in research in a
range of fields: cognitive neuroscience, computational
linguistics, human and computer interactions, and
learning environments. The time is ripe to bring these
fields together to develop a better understanding
of the entire process of learning.
[Where Discoveries Begin]
(Use "back" to return to the text.)
Let me conclude my remarks by highlighting a few key
points.
- An economy rooted in science, engineering,
and technology can't sustain itself without a
vibrant basic research enterprise and a world
class cadre of scientists and engineers.
- We also need to keep lifting the capabilities
of our core disciplines through our priority investments
while striking out in new directions at the frontiers
of research and education.
- And, we need to continue creating and
nurturing our partnerships among industry, academe,
and government.
I'll stop there, because that's where you come in.
|