United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home Feedback

Table 1: Selected Production Function Studies
AUTHOR EQUATION DATA ELASTICITY* COMMENTS
ASCHAUER (1989) Cobb-Douglas production function and TFP regressions time series 1949-85
Private Business Economy
0.39- 0.36
0.37-0.41
Significant
Constant returns to scale (CRS) in all inputs, including public capital input
MUNNELL (1990a) Cobb-Douglas production function reproduces Aschauer time series 1948-1987 private non- farm sector 0.34-0.41
Significant
CRS in all inputs; also priv. and publ. cap. coef. equal
MUNNELL (1990b) Cobb-Douglas production function cross-sect. time series 48 states 1970-1986 0.15 see Munnell 1991 and other references
MUNNELL (1991) Cobb-Douglas production function cross-sect. Average 1970-1986 states values
12 high endowm.
26 mid. endowm.
10 low endowm.
0.14
0.11
0.22
Significant
Returns to Scale
1.01
1.03
1.04
GARCIA-MILA AND McGUIRE (1988) Cobb-Douglas production function cross-sect. time series 14 annual obs. of 48 states gross state prod. labor, capital expenditures on education and highways Highways:
0.045-0.044
Education:
0.16-0.072
Significant
Returns to Scale
1.04
Cannot reject increasing returns to scale
EBERTS (1988) Translog production function cross-sect. manufacturing 1958-1978 38 Metropolitan Areas 0.04
Significant
CRS; public and private capital substitutes public and labor complements
HULTEN AND SCHWAB (1991a) Cobb-Douglas production function with first differences. time series 1949-1985 same as Aschauer 0.42
Significant
0.028
Insignificant
(-) coeff. for labor
TATOM (1991) Cobb-Douglas production function including energy price, with first differences. time series 1974-1987 Business Sect. 0.146
Insignificant
CRS
MERA (1972) Cobb-Douglas production function Japan pooled data of regions and time 3 sectors
4 classifications of social overhead capital
0.22
0.20 (.50)
0.12-0.18
Significant
 
FORD AND PORET (1991) TFP regressions USA and 11 OECD countries time series and country cross-section Half of countries significant effect after 1960
Mixed support of Aschauer results
 
HULTEN AND SCHWAB (1991b) TFP regressions cross section time series regional study of Snow-Sun Belt 1970-1986 Gross output value added public capital insignif. in all regressions private capital insignif. in gross output regres. signif. in value added implying scale .88  

*Coefficient of infrastructure capital in logarithmic equation.

Table 2: Cost or Profit Function Estimates
  DESCRIPTION     DIRECT EFFECT   INDIRECT EFFECT  
Author Unit of
Analysis
Specification Public Capital Cost Labor Capital Intermediate
BERNDT AND HANSSON (1991) Sweden Private Sector 1960-1988 Variable Cost Labor Requirement Function Core Public Capital Cost Savings Unclear Short-run complements ---- ----
DENO (1988) USA 36 SMSA Manufacturing Industries 1970-78
Pooled
Profit Truncated Translog Highway, Water and Sewer Adjusted with the proportion of population employed by the sector Profit increase
Elasticity = .08 to .5
Gross complements
Elasticity = 0.1 to .4
Gross complements
Elasticity = 0.11 to .4
----
CONRAD AND SEITZ (1992) West Germany Manufacturing Construction, Trade and Transport 1960-1988 Time-Series Cost Translog and MR=MC Total Adjusted with capacity utilization rate Cost Savings Substitutes Complements Substitutes
KEELER AND YING (1988) USA Trucking Industry 1960-1988 Regional Pooled Cost Translog Highway Stock Cost Savings ---- ---- ----
LYNDE AND RICHMOND (1992) USA Nonfinancial Corporate Business Sector 1958-1989 Time-Series Cost Translog
P = MC and CRS
Total Federal and State Cost Savings Substitutes
Elasticity = -.45 to -.49
Complements Elasticity = .71 to .90 ----
LYNDE AND RICHMOND (1993) U.K. Manufacturing sector 1966:1 to 1992:2 value added Cost translog Total Cost Savings ---- Substitutes ----
MORRISON AND SCHWARTZ (1991) USA Manufacturing by State 1971-1987 Pooled by Region State specific Effects Variable Cost Generalized Leontief P=MC Core Cost Savings Elasticity = -.10 to -.27 ---- ---- ----

Table 2: Cost or Profit Function Estimates (Cont'd)
  DESCRIPTION     DIRECT EFFECT   INDIRECT EFFECT  
Author Unit of
Analysis
Specification Public Capital Cost Labor Capital Intermediate
NADIRI AND MAMUNEAS (1991) USA Manufacturing 12 2-digit industries 1955-1986 Pooled Industry Specific Effects Cost Translog CRS for Private Inputs Total Stock Adjusted with Capacity Utilization Rate Cost Savings
Elasticity = 0 to -.21
Substitutes
Elasticity = 0 to -1.4
Substitutes
Elasticity = -.02 to -1.4
Complements
Elasticity =.12 to .76
SEITZ (1992a) West Germany 31 2-digit Industries 1970-1989 Pooled Industry Specific Effects Cost Generalized Leontief Public Roads
Length of Motorway System
Cost Savings Substitutes
Elasticity = -.0004
Complements
Elasticity = .03 to .04
----
SEITZ (1992b) West Germany 31 2-digit Industries 1970-1989 Pooled Industry Specific Effects Cost Generalized Leontief Total
Core
Cost Savings Substitutes
Elasticity = -.15 to -.13
Complements
Elasticity = .34 to .86
----
SHAH (1992) Mexican Manufacturing Sector 26 3-digit Industries Pooled Variable Cost Translog Total Adjusted with industries' output proportion Cost Savings Complements
Elasticity = -.006
Complements
Elasticity = -.002
Substitutes
Elasticity = .005

NOTE: CRS = Constant Returns to Scale


FHWA Home | HPTS Home | Feedback
FHWA
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration