American Association for the Advancement of Science and Centre for Science Research and Statistics (AAAS/CSRS). 2001. Comparative study of national R&D policy and R&D data systems in the United States and Russia (draft). Washington, DC.

Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, pp. 609–25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bas, C. L., and C. Sierra. 2002. Location versus home country advantages in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals' location strategies. Research Policy 31:589–609.

Bloom, N., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen. 2002. Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics 85:1–31.

Bozeman, B. 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy 29:627–55.

Branscomb, L. M., and R. Florida. 1998. Challenges to technology policy in a changing world economy. In L. M. Branscomb and J. H. Keller, Investing in Innovation- Creating a Research and Innovation Policy That Works, pp. 3–39. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Brealey, R., and S. Myers. 1996. Principles of Corporate Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Brod, A., and A. N. Link. 2001. Trends in cooperative research activity. In M. P. Feldman and A. Link, eds., Technology Policy for the Knowledge-Based Economy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

Colwell, R. 2001. Director's forum lecture. Speech presented to the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 7 November, Washington, DC.

Coombs, R., and L. Georghiou. 2002. A new "industrial ecology." Science 296 (April).

Fraumeni, B. and S. Okubo. 2002. R&D in the national income and product accounts: A first look at its effect on GDP. Paper presented at the Conference on Measuring Capital in the New Economy, April 26–27, Washington, D.C. National Bureau of Economic Research and Federal Reserve Board. Available at http://www.bea.gov/bea/working_papers.htm.

Hagedoorn, J. 2001. Interfirm R&D partnership: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. In J. E. Jankowski, A. N. Link, and N. S. Vonortas, eds., Strategic Research Partnerships: Proceedings of an NSF Workshop. NSF 01–336. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Hagerdoorn, J., A. N. Link, and N. S. Vonortas. 2000. Research partnerships. Research Policy 29:567–586.

Hall, B., and J. Van Reenen. 2000. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29:449–469.

Howells, J., and A. James. 2001. Corporate decision-making on the sourcing of technological knowledge. Discussion Paper 01-01. Manchester, U.K.: The University of Manchester Institute for Policy Research in Engineering, Science, and Technology (PREST).

Industrial Research Institute (IRI). 2003. IRI's R&D trends forecast for 2003. Research Technology Management 46(1):17.

Jankowski, J. 2001. Measurement and growth of R&D within the service economy. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(4):323–336.

Kaiser, F., A. M. Klemperer, A. Gorrnitzka, E. G. Schrier, B. J. R. van der Meulen, and P. A. M. Maassen. 1999. Separating Teaching and Research Expenditure in Higher Education. Overijssel, Netherlands: University of Twente Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.

Knezo, G. J. 2002. Federal Research and Development Budgeting and Priority-Setting Issues, 107th Congress. Issue Brief for Congress, IB 10088. Washington, DC: U.S. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

Kuemmerle, W. 1999. Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries-Results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy 28:179–93.

Kumar, N. 2001. Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: The case of U.S. and Japanese corporations. Research Policy 30:159–74.

Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles-Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Leyden, D. P., and A. N. Link. 1999. Federal laboratories as research partners. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17:575–592.

Link, A. N. 1999. Public/private partnerships in the United States. Industry and Innovation 6(2):191–217.

Link, A. N. 2003. Science parks indicators workshop. Final report submitted to the National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Link, A. N. and K. R. Link. 2003. On the growth of U.S. science parks. Journal of Technology Transfer 28:81–85.

Meeks, R. 2002. Proposed FY 2003 Budget Would Complete Plan to Double Health R&D Funding, Considerably Expand Defense R&D. NSF InfoBrief 02–326. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/infbrief/nsf02326/start.htm.

Mowery, D. C. 1983. The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940. Explorations in Economic History 20:351–374.

Nakamura. L. 2001. Investing in intangibles: Is a trillion dollars missing from GDP? Business Review Q4:27–37. Available at http://www.phil.frb.org/econ/br/br01.html.

National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 1995. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) 1990. Federal Register 55(24) (5 February): 3885.

National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Measuring the Science and Engineering Enterprise. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2003. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Science Board (NSB). 1998. U.S. and international research and development: Funds and alliances. Science and Engineering Indicators - 1998. NSB-98-1. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Board (NSB). 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators - 2000. Vol. I. NSB-00-1. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Board (NSB). 2002. U.S. and international research and development: Funds and alliances. Science and Engineering Indicators - 2002. Vol. I. NSB-02-1. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2002. Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions: Fiscal Year 2000. NSF 02–319. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf02319/start.htm.

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). Forthcoming. Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2001, 2002, 2003.

Nelson, R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 49:297–306.

Niosi, J. 1999. The internationalization of industrial R&D: From technology transfer to the learning organization. Research Policy 28:107–17.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1996. Fiscal Measures to Promote R&D and Innovation. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1999. Research and Development in Industry: Expenditure and Researchers, Scientists and Engineers 1976–97. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2000. Science and Technology Main Indicators and Basic Statistics in the Russian Federation 1992–98. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2001. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard: Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002a. Analytical Business Enterprise Research and Development (ANBERD) Database.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002d. Main Science and Technology Indicators Database.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002e. Measuring the Information Economy. Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002f. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development (Frascati Manual). Paris.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002g. Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook. Paris.

Poterba, J., ed. 1997. Borderline Case: International Tax Policy, Corporate Research and Development, and Investment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Red Iberomericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Iberomerican Network on Science & Technology Indicators) (RICYT). 2002. Principales Indicadores de Ciencia Y Tenologia 2001. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Rosenberg, N., and R. R. Nelson. 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23:323–348.

Schacht, W. H. 2000. Patent ownership and Federal research and development: A discussion on the Bayh-Dole Act and the Stevenson-Wydler Act. U.S. Congressional Research Service Report RL30320. Washington, DC.

Schacht, W. H. 2003. Cooperative R&D: Federal Efforts to Promote Industrial Competitiveness. Issue Brief for Congress, IB 89056. Washington, DC: U.S. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

Steelman, J. R. 1947. Science and Public Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Reprinted 1980. New York: Arno Press.

Tassey, G. 1996. Choosing government R&D policies: Tax incentives vs. direct funding. Review of Industrial Organization 11(5):579–600.

Tassey, G. 1997. The Economics of R&D Policy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

Tassey, G. 1999. R&D Trends in the U.S. Economy: Strategies and Policy Implications. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (U.S. BEA). 2003. Industry accounts data: Gross domestic product by industry. http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn2/gpoc.htm. Accessed 25 March 2003.

U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), Office of the Secretary. 2002. Summary Report on Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer, 2002: Report to the President and the Congress Under the Technology Transfer and Commercialization Act. Washington, DC.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration (U.S. DOC/TA). 2002. U.S. Corporate R&D Investment, 1994–2000 Final Estimates. Available at http://www.ta.doc.gov/Reports.htm.

U.S. General Accounting Office (U.S. GAO). 2001a. Federal Research and Development: Contributions to and Results of the Small Business Technology Transfer Program. GAO-01-867T. Washington, DC.

U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001b. Research and Development: Reported Gap Between Data From Federal Agencies and Their R&D Performers: Results From Noncomparable Data. GAO-01-512R. Washington, DC.

U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2002. Technology Transfer-Several Factors Have Led to a Decline in Partnerships at DOE's Laboratories. GAO-02-465. Washington, DC.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB) 2000. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB). 2001. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB). 2003a. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB). 2003b. Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

van Beuzekom, B. 2001. Biotechnology statistics in OECD member countries: Compendium of existing national statistics. Working Paper 2001/6. Paris: Directorate for Science, Technology, and Industry (STI), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

von Zedtwitz, M., and O. Gassmann. 2002. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy 31:569–588.

Vonortas, N. S. 1997. Cooperation in Research and Development. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

Ward, M. 1985. Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures in the OECD. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Zeile, W. J. 2002. U.S. affiliates of foreign companies-Operations in 2000. Survey of Current Business August: 149–166.

National Science Board
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics
Science and Engineering Indicators 2004
Arlington, VA (NSB 04-01) [May 2004]