BIPARTISAN CAMPAIGN REFORM ACT CASES

Displayed jurisdictional statements and briefs were submitted to the Court electronically. The official documents are on file in the Clerk's Office. The displayed documents might not be exact duplicates of the official documents and may not constitute a complete set of the jurisdictional statements and briefs filed in the cases.

Media Advisories

• Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Audiotapes
• Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Cases

Jurisdictional Statements, Briefs, etc.

No. 02-1674, McCONNELL, SENATOR, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Vol. 1 Appendix (applies to all cases)
• Vol. 2 App.
• Vol. 3 App.
• Vol. 4 App.
• Jurisdictional statement
• Response to jurisdictional statement of Intervenors-Appellees
• Reply in support of Jurisdictional statement
• Brief on merits of McConnell, et al. (FINAL)
• Appendix to McConnell, et al. brief
• Brief on merits of FEC, et al (FINAL)
• Reply brief on merits of McConnell, et al.
• Joint appendix Volume I
• Joint appendix Volume II
• Joint appendix Volume III
• Joint appendix Volume IV
• Joint appendix Volume V

No. 02-1675, NRA, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Response to jurisdictional statement of Intervenors-Appellees
• Brief on merits of NRA, et al. (FINAL)
• Reply Brief on merits of NRA, et al.

No. 02-1676, FEC, ET AL. V. McCONNELL, SENATOR, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Brief on merits of Echols, et al. (FINAL)
• Reply Brief on merits of Echols, et al.

No 02-1702, McCAIN, SENATOR, ET AL. V. McCONNELL, SENATOR

• Jurisdictional statement
• Motion of McCain et al. to file their brief under seal with redacted copies
• Brief on merits of McCain, et al. (Redacted) (FINAL)

No. 02-1727, REPUBLICAN NAT. COMM. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Response to jurisdictional statement of Intervenors-Appellees
• Brief on merits of the Political Parties (also for 02-1733 & 02-1753) (FINAL)
• Reply brief on merits of the Political Parties

No. 02-1733, NAT. RIGHT TO LIFE, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Response to jurisdictional statement of Intervenors-Appellees
• Brief on merits of Nat. Right to Life, et al. (FINAL)
• Reply Brief on merits of Nat. Right to Life, et al.
• Appendix to reply brief

No. 02-1734, ACLU V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional Statement
• Response to jurisdictional statement of Intervenors-Appellees
• Brief on merits of ACLU
• Reply brief on merits of ACLU

No. 02-1740, ADAMS, VICTORIA J., ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Brief on merits of Adams, et al. (FINAL)
• Reply brief on merits of Adams, et al.

No. 02-1747, PAUL, CONGRESSMAN, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Brief on merits of Paul, Congressman, et al. (FINAL)
• Appendix to Brief
• Reply Brief on merits of Paul, Congressman, et al.

No. 02-1753, CA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement

No. 02-1755, AFL-CIO, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Response to jurisdictional statement of Intervenors-Appellees
• Brief on merits of AFL-CIO (FINAL)
• Reply Brief on merits of AFL-CIO

No. 02-1756, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ET AL. V. FEC, ET AL.

• Jurisdictional statement
• Response to jurisdictional statement of Intervenors-Appellees
• Brief on merits of Chamber of Commerce, et al. (FINAL)
• Reply Brief on merits of Chamber of Commerce, et al.

Amicus Curiae Briefs

• CATO Institute and Institute for Justice
• States of Virginia, et al.
• Rodney A. Smith
• American Civil Rights Union
• Hon. J. Dennis Hastert
• David Moshman
• Center for Governmental Studies
• International Experts
• Interfaith Alliance Foundation, et al.
• Fred Thompson
• Common Cause and AARP
• Center for Responsive Politics
• League of Women Voters of the United States
• Former Leaders of ACLU
• California Student Public Interest Research Group, et al.
• Committee for Economic Development, et al.
• Bipartisan Former Members of the United States Congress
• Iowa, et al.

Oral Arguments

• Motion of Adams, et al., for oral argument
• Motion of McConnell, Senator, et al., Republican Nat. Comm., Nat. Right to Life Comm., ACLU, CA Democratic Party, AFL-CIO, and Chamber of Commerce for divided argument
• Motion of McCain, Senator, et al. for divided argument
• Motion of NRA, et al. for divided argument
• Motion of FEC, et al. for divided argument
• Motion of Paul, Congressman, et al. for separate oral argument
• Motion of Echols, et al. for divided argument
• Response of Echols, et al. to motions for divided argument
• Response of Paul, Congressman, et al. to motion for divided argument filed by McConnell, Senator, et al., Republican Nat. Comm., Nat. Right to Life Comm., ACLU, CA Democratic Party, AFL-CIO, and Chamber of Commerce.
• Response of McCain, Senator, et al., to motions for divided argument
• Response of McConnell, Senator, et al. Republican Nat. Comm., Nat. Right to Life Comm., ACLU, CA Democratic Party, AFL-CIO, and Chamber of Commerce to motions for divided argument
• Response of NRA to motion for divided argument filed by McConnell, Senator, et al., Republican Nat. Comm., Nat. Right to Life Comm., ACLU, CA Democratic Party, AFL-CIO, and Chamber of Commerce
• Response of FEC, et al., to motions for divided argument
• Motion of Paul, Congressman, et al., for reconsideration of their motion for divided argument
• Response of McConnell, Senator, et al., to motion for reconsideration filed by Paul, Congressman, et al.
• Motion of NRA, et al., for reconsideration of their motion for divided argument
• Response of McConnell, Senator, et al., to motion for reconsideration filed by NRA, et al.
• DAY CALL for September 8, 2003 Arguments

Opinions and Orders

• Order noting probable jurisdiction
• Order setting forth page limitations
• Order on divided argument motions
• Order on motions for reconsideration of motions for divided argument
• Opinion in McConnell v. Federal Election Comm'n.

HOME | ABOUT THE COURT | DOCKET | ORAL ARGUMENTS | BAR ADMISSIONS | COURT RULES
CASE HANDLING GUIDES | OPINIONS | ORDERS | VISITING THE COURT | PUBLIC INFORMATION | JOBS | LINKS

(To view PDF files)      Adobe Access PDF to HTML conversion

Last Updated: December 10, 2003
Page Name: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/bcra/bcra.html