OMB Seal
Welcome to the Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
White House Seal
OMB Home Page
White House Home Page
  Site Search     
First Blue StarSecond Blue Star Third Blue Star Fourth Blue Star
 
Printer-Friendly Version

OVERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT’S 2005 BUDGET

    The President’s 2005 Budget continues to support and advance three overriding national priorities: winning the war on terror, protecting the homeland, and strengthening the economy.

    The President is committed to spending what is necessary to provide for our security––and restraining spending elsewhere. Since September 11, 2001, more than three-quarters of the increase in discretionary spending has been directly related to our response to the attacks, enhanced homeland security, and the War on Terror. The President’s 2005 Budget continues this spending trend: significant increases in funding our security programs combined with a dramatic reduction in the growth of discretionary spending unrelated to security.

    The President’s Budget:

Growth rates exclude supplemental appropriations. Supplementals increase defense and homeland security growth rates dramatically (these categories received 90 percent of supplemental funding).
Enhanced Security—Restraint Elsewhere is the name of the bar chart. The chart shows the percentage change from 2001–2005 in the areas of Defense, Homeland Security, and non-Defense/non-Homeland. Defense: 2001 5%, 2002 8%, 2003 11%, 2004 3%, 2005 7%. Homeland Security: 2001 14%, 2002 21%, 2003 85%, 2004 18%, 2005 10%. Non-Defense/non-Homeland: 2001 15%, 2002 6%, 2003 5%, 2004 4%, 2005 1%.

    For the second year in a row, the President’s Budget is built on the sensible premise that Government spending should grow no faster than the average increase in American family incomes of approximately four percent. This Budget proposes to hold the growth in total discretionary spending to 3.9 percent and to reduce the growth in non-defense, non-homeland security spending to 0.5 percent, below the rate of inflation. In the last budget year of the previous administration (2001), discretionary spending unrelated to defense or homeland security soared by 15 percent. With the adoption of President Bush’s first budget (2002), that growth rate was reduced to six percent; then five percent the following year; and four percent for the current fiscal year. The President’s 2005 Budget continues this trend and will also provide new budget enforcement mechanisms, establishing statutory controls to restrain the growth in both discretionary and mandatory spending.

    The President’s Budget builds on the pro-growth economic policies that have laid the foundation for the strong recovery now underway, and for sustained economic growth and job creation in the years ahead.

    The President’s tax cuts have been critical to achieving his priority of strengthening the economy and creating jobs. Perhaps the best timed in American history, these tax cuts deserve much credit for today’s brightening economic picture, which includes:

President’s Six-Point Economic Growth Plan
1. Making health care costs more affordable and predictable.
2. Reducing the lawsuit burden on the economy.
3. Ensuring an affordable, reliable energy supply.
4. Streamlining regulations and reporting requirements.
5. Opening new markets for American products.
6. Enabling families and businesses to plan for the future with confidence by making the tax cuts permanent.

    These indicators suggest that job growth, which typically lags recovery, should continue to strengthen in the months ahead. There is more to do however, and the President has put forward a six-point plan for economic and jobs growth, including making permanent the tax relief that has fueled our economic recovery. The sustained growth that this Budget supports will be good news for our budget picture as well: As the economy improves, Treasury revenues will too.

    The Federal budget––like America itself––is in solid shape considering the extraordinary strains placed upon it: a stock market collapse that began in early 2000; a recession that was fully underway by early 2001; revelation of corporate scandals; and, of course, the September 11th attacks and ensuing War on Terror.

With continued pro-growth economic policies and spending restraint reflected in the Budget, deficits fall sharply.
A bar chart titled, Defecits as a percent of GDP. The years start in 2004 through 2009 and the charts shows the deficits decreasing each year. There is a line going through the chart stating that the 40–year historical average is -2.2%.

    With Treasury receipts only beginning to reflect a recovering economy––and major ongoing expenditures in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the War on Terror––we still face a projected $521 billion deficit for the 2004 fiscal year. Although a legitimate matter of concern, that size deficit, at 4.5 percent of GDP, is not historically out of range. Deficits have been this large or larger in six of the last 25 years, including a peak of 6.0 percent in 1983.

    The Administration remains committed to dramatic deficit reduction in the coming years. With continuation of the President’s economic growth policies and sound spending restraint as reflected in this Budget, our projections show the deficit will be cut by more than half over the next five years. Indeed, our projections show the deficit falling from 4.5 percent of GDP in 2004 to 1.6 percent by 2009––which is also well below the 2.2 percent average deficit during the last 40 years.

    Since President Bush took office, our Nation has confronted a cascading set of challenges. President Bush and the Congress responded on all fronts, with tax relief to get the economy going, the largest reorganization of the Federal Government in 50 years to create a new Department of Homeland Security, and the largest increases in the defense budget since the Reagan Administration to wage and win the War on Terror. The President’s 2005 Budget builds on this record of accomplishment. With renewed economic growth and the Congress’ cooperation in restraining spending and focusing it on our most critical priorities, we can accomplish the great goals the President has set for the country, while dramatically improving our budget situation.