|
 |
|
Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
[June 28, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 123)]
[Unified Agenda]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID: f:ua040424.wais]
[Page 38154-38319]
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part XXIV
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
[[Page 38154]]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
_______________________________________________________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
40 CFR Ch. I
FRL-7659-4
Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.
_______________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda to update the public about:
• Regulations and major policies currently under development,
• Reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and
• Regulations and major policies completed or canceled since the
last Agenda.
TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA MAILING LIST: If you would like to
subscribe, please send an e-mail with your name and address to:
ncepimal@one.net, or call 800-490-9198. There is no charge for single
copies of the Agenda.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions or comments
about a particular action, please get in touch with the agency contact
listed in each Agenda entry. If you have general questions about or
suggestions for improving the Agenda or questions about EPA's decision
making process, please contact: Phil Schwartz (1803A), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460;
phone: (202)564-6564; e-mail: schwartz.philip@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
A. What Are EPA's Goals in Developing Regulations-and-Policies and What
Key Principles, Statutes, and Executive Orders Drive Our Rule-and-
Policymaking Process?
B. How Can You Be Involved in EPA's Rule and Policymaking Process?
C. What Actions Are Included in the Agenda?
D. How Is the Agenda Organized?
E. What Information Is in Agenda Entries?
F. How Can You Find Out More About EPA Rulemakings?
G. What Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small
Businesses, Small Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations?
H. Acknowledgment of Those Involved in the Rulemaking Process
A. What are EPA's Goals in Developing Regulations and Policies and What
Key Principles, Statutes, and Executive Orders Drive Our Rule and
Policymaking Process?
Our primary objective is to protect human health and the
environment. To achieve this objective and ensure that our
decisions are cost-effective and fully protective, we conduct high
quality scientific, economic, and policy analyses. These analyses
are planned and initiated at early stages in the regulatory
development process, so that Agency decision makers are well
informed of the qualitative and quantitative benefits and costs as
they select among alternative approaches. It is also important that
we continue to apply new and improved methods to protect the
environment, such as: building flexibility into regulations from
the very beginning, creating strong partnerships with the regulated
community, vigorously engaging in public outreach and involvement,
and using effective nonregulatory approaches. Research, testing and
adoption of new environmental protection methods are also a central
tenet in environmental problem solving. The integration of all
these elements via a well managed regulatory development process
and a strong commitment to innovative solutions will ensure that we
all benefit from significant environmental improvements that are
fair, efficient, and protective. Our overall success is measured by
our effectiveness in protecting human health and the environment.
Besides the fundamental environmental laws authorizing EPA
actions such as the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, there are
legal requirements that apply to the issuance of regulations that
are generally contained in the Administrative Procedure Act, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act, the Paperwork Reduction Act, the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act, and the Congressional Review Act.
We also must meet a number of requirements contained in
Executive Orders. Of particular significance for EPA rulemakings
are Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review; 58 FR
51735; October 4, 1993), 12898 (Environmental Justice; 59 FR 7629;
February 16, 1994), 13045 (Children's Health Protection; 62 FR
19885; April 23, 1997), 13132 (Federalism; 64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments; 59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000), and 13211 (Energy; 66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
You can find information on these laws and Executive orders
through links from www.epa.gov/regagenda.
B. How Can You Be Involved in EPA's Rule and Policymaking Process?
You can make your voice heard by getting in touch with the
contact person provided in each Agenda entry. We urge you to
participate as early in the process as possible. You may also
participate by commenting on proposed rules that we publish in the
Federal Register. To be most effective, comments should contain
information and data that support your position, and you also
should explain why we should incorporate your suggestion in the
rule or non-regulatory action. You can be particularly helpful and
persuasive if you provide examples to illustrate your concerns and
offer specific alternatives.
We believe our actions will be more cost-effective and
protective if our development process includes stakeholders working
with us to identify the most practical and effective solutions to
problems and we stress this point most strongly in all of our
training programs for rule and policy developers. Democracy gives
real power to individual citizens, but with that power comes
responsibility. Democracy is not a spectator sport. We urge you to
become involved in EPA's rule and policymaking process.
C. What Actions Are Included in the Agenda?
EPA includes regulations and certain major policy documents in
the Agenda. We generally do not include minor amendments or the
following categories of actions:
• Administrative actions such as delegations of authority,
changes of address or phone numbers.
• Under the Clean Air Act: Revisions to State Implementation
Plans; Equivalent Methods for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring; Deletions
from the New Source Performance Standards source categories list;
[[Page 38155]]
Delegations of Authority to States; Area Designations for Air Quality
Planning Purposes.
• Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act:
Decision documents defining and establishing registration standards;
decision documents and termination decisions for the Special Review
Registration process; and data call-in requests made under section
3(c)(2)(B).
• Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Actions
regarding pesticide tolerances and food additive regulations, including
the tolerance reassessment process.
• Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act:
Authorization of State solid waste management plans; hazardous waste
delisting petitions.
• Under the Clean Water Act: State Water Quality Standards;
deletions from the section 307(a) list of toxic pollutants; suspensions
of toxic testing requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES); delegations of NPDES authority to States.
• Under the Safe Drinking Water Act: Actions on State
underground injection control programs.
There is no legal significance to the omission of an item from
the Agenda.
D. How Is the Agenda Organized?
We have organized the Agenda:
First, into fourteen divisions based on the law that would
authorize a particular action. These divisions are:
1. General, which includes cross-cutting actions, such as rules
authorized by multiple statutes and general acquisition rules
2. The Clean Air Act (CAA)
3. The Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
4. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
5. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
6. The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
7. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
8. Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory
Relief Act
9. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
10. The Oil Pollution Act (OPA)
11. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act Superfund (CERCLA)
12. The Clean Water Act (CWA)
13. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
14. The Shore Protection Act (SPA)
Second, by the current stage of development. The stages are:
1. Prerulemaking - Prerulemaking actions are generally intended to
determine whether EPA should initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings may
include anything that influences or leads to rulemaking, such as
advance notices of proposed rulemaking (ANPRMs), significant studies or
analyses of the possible need for regulatory action, announcement of
reviews of existing regulations required under section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Ac, requests for public comment on the need for
regulatory action, or important preregulatory policy proposals.
2. Proposed Rule - This section includes EPA rulemaking actions that
are within a year of proposal (publication of Notices of Proposed
Rulemakings (NPRMs)).
3. Final Rule - This section includes rules that will be issued as a
final rule within a year.
4. Long-Term Action - This section includes rulemakings for which the
next scheduled regulatory action is after April 2005.
5. Completed Action - This section contains actions that have been
promulgated and published in the Federal Register since publication of
the Fall 2003 Agenda. It also includes actions that we are no longer
considering. If an action appears in the completed section, it will not
appear in future Agendas unless we decide to initiate action again, in
which case it will appear as a new entry. EPA also announces the
results of our Regulatory Flexibility Act section 610 reviews in this
section of the Agenda.
Third, by the Regulation Identifier Number assigned when an
action is added to the Agenda.
E. What Information Is in Agenda Entries?
Agenda entries include the following information, where
applicable:
Sequence Number: This indicates where the entry appears in the Agenda.
Title: Titles for new entries (those that have not appeared in
previous Agendas) are preceded by a bullet ([bullet]). The notation
``Section 610 Review'' follows the title if we are reviewing the
rule as part of our periodic review of existing rules under section
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 610).
Priority: Entries are placed into one of five categories
described below. OMB reviews all significant rules including both
of the first two categories, ``economically significant'' and
``other significant.''
Economically Significant: Under Executive Order 12866, a
rulemaking action that may have an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities.
Other Significant: A rulemaking that is not economically
significant but is considered significant for other reasons. This
category includes rules that may:
1. Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency;
2. Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients; or
3. Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates,
the President's priorities, or the principles in Executive Order 12866.
Substantive, Nonsignificant: A rulemaking that has substantive
impacts but is neither Significant, nor Routine and Frequent, nor
Informational/Administrative/Other.
Routine and Frequent: A rulemaking that is a specific case of
a recurring application of a regulatory program in the Code of
Federal Regulations (e.g., certain State Implementation Plans,
National Priority List updates, Significant New Use Rules, State
Hazardous Waste Management Program actions, and Tolerance
exemptions). If an action that would normally be classified Routine
and Frequent is reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
under E.O. 12866, then we would classify the action as either
``Economically Significant'' or ``Other Significant.''
[[Page 38156]]
Informational/Administrative/Other: An action that is not a
rulemaking that is primarily informational or pertains to agency
matters not central to accomplishing the Agency's regulatory
mandate, but that the Agency places in the Agenda to inform the
public of the activity; or other action that is not within the
scope of E.O. 12866.
Also, if we believe that a rule may be ``major'' as defined in
the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801, et seq.) because it is
likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or meets other criteria specified in this law, we indicate
this under the ``Priority'' heading with the statement ``Major
under 5 U.S.C. 801.''
Legal Authority: The sections of the United States Code
(U.S.C.), Public Law (P.L.), Executive Order (E.O.), or common name
of the law that authorizes the regulatory action.
CFR Citation: The sections of the Code of Federal Regulations
that would be affected by the action.
Legal Deadline: An indication of whether the rule is subject to
a statutory or judicial deadline, the date of that deadline, and
whether the deadline pertains to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, a
Final Action, or some other action.
Abstract: A brief description of the problem the action will address.
Timetable:The dates (and citations) that documents for this
action were published in the Federal Register and, where possible,
a projected date for the next step. Projected publication dates
frequently change during the course of developing an action. The
projections in the Agenda are our best estimates as of the date we
submit the Agenda for publication. For some entries, the timetable
indicates that the date of the next action is ``to be determined.''
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Indicates whether EPA
has prepared or anticipates that it will be preparing a regulatory
flexibility analysis under section 603 or 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). Generally, such an analysis is required for
proposed or final rules subject to the RFA that EPA believes may
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small Entities Affected: Indicates whether we expect the rule
to have any effect on small businesses, small governments, or small
nonprofit organizations
Government Levels Affected: Indicates whether we expect the
rule to have any effect on levels of government and, if so, whether
the governments are State, local, tribal, or Federal.
Federalism Implications: Indicates whether the action is
expected to have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Unfunded Mandates: Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act generally requires an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits if a rule includes a mandate that may result in
expenditures of more than $100 million in any one year by State,
local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector. If we expect to exceed this $100 million threshold, we note
it in this section.
Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the action is a significant
energy action under Executive Order 13211.
Agency Contact: The name, address, phone number, and e-mail
address, if available, of a person who is knowledgeable about the
regulation.
SAN Number: A code number that EPA uses to identify and track
rulemakings.
URLs: For some of our actions we include the Internet addresses
for: reading copies of rulemaking documents; submitting comments on
proposals; and getting more information about the rulemaking and
the program of which it is a part.
RIN: The Regulatory Identifier Number is used by OMB to
identify and track rulemakings. The first four digits of the RIN
stand for the EPA office with lead responsibility for developing
the action.
F. How Can You Find Out More About EPA Rulemakings?
1. Public Dockets When EPA publishes either an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking or a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register, the Agency may establish an official docket to accumulate
materials throughout the development process for that rulemaking. The
official docket serves as the repository for the collection of
documents or information related to a particular agency action or
activity. EPA most commonly uses dockets for rulemaking actions, but
dockets may also be used for Regulatory Flexibility Act section 610
reviews of rules with significant impacts on a substantial number of
small entities and various non-rulemaking activities, such as Federal
Register documents seeking public comments on draft guidance, policy
statements, information collection requests under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and other non-rule activities. In 2002, EPA released its
online electronic docket and comment system, EDOCKET at
http://www.epa.gov/edocket.
2. EPA Websites Some of the actions listed in the Agenda include a URL
that provides additional information.
3. Regulatory Agenda Databases and Search Engines If you have access to
the Internet you can use databases and their accompanying search
engines developed by the EPA and the Regulatory Information Service
Center (RISC) at the General Services Administration to help you locate
actions that are of interest to you. The EPA Regulatory Agenda search
engine is located at www.epa.gov/regAgenda. We thoroughly update this
database each spring and fall and we partially update it several other
times during the year. RISC's searchable databases are at
http://www.ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/
4. Appendices to the Agenda There are five appendices that provide:
a. A list of the existing rules that we are reviewing under section 610
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
b. A list of actions that may have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small businesses, small governments, or small
non-profit organizations
c. A list of actions that may have some impact on some small
businesses, small governments, or small non-profit organizations but
which may either have less than a significant impact or affect fewer
than a substantial number of them
d. A list of actions that may affect State, local, or tribal governments
e. A list of actions that may have federalism implications as defined
in Executive Order 13132
There is a sixth appendix included in the Unified Regulatory
Agenda, a subject matter index. This appendix is not included in
EPA's Agenda reprints
[[Page 38157]]
for reasons of costs and because of the availability of the search
engines described in [greek-i]3, immediately above.
5. The Regulatory Agenda Collection in the EPA History Office has a
complete collection of Regulatory Agendas and related materials. A list
of the contents including exact citations for all Agendas is at:
http://www.epa.gov/history/collection/aid41.htm
6. Listservers If you want to get automatic e-mails about areas of
particular interest, we maintain 12 collections including:
a. Air
b. Water
c. Wastes and emergency response
d. Pesticides
e. Toxic substances
f. Right-to-know and toxic release inventory
g. Environmental impacts
h. Endangered species
i. Meetings
j. The Science Advisory Board
k. Daily full-text notices with page numbers, and
l. General information.
For more information and to subscribe via our FR Web site,
visit: http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/subscribe. If you have e-mail
without full Internet access, please send an e-mail to
envsubset@epa.gov to request instructions for subscribing to the
EPA Federal Register listservers
7. EPA's FY04 Regulatory Plan The Regulatory Plan covers the core of
our priority actions that we expected to be published by September
2004. We have 30 actions in the Plan which was published December 22,
2003. There are entries for each of these actions in the Spring 2004
Regulatory Agenda, but we discuss them in greater detail in the Plan.
You can view the Plan at http://www.epa.gov.regagenda
G. What Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small
Businesses, Small Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations?
For each of our rulemakings we consider whether there will be
any adverse impact on any small entity. We attempt to fit the
regulatory requirements, to the extent feasible, to the scale of
the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to the regulation. Under RFA/SBREFA, the Agency must
prepare a formal analysis of the potential negative impacts on
small entities, convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel
(proposed rule stage), and prepare a Small Entity Compliance Guide
(final rule stage) unless the Agency certifies a rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. For more detailed information about the Agency's policy
and practice with respect to implementing RFA/SBREFA, please visit
the RFA/SBREFA website at http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/.See Appendix B
at the end of the Agenda, ``Index to Environmental Protection
Agency Entries for which a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is
Required'' for a list of these rules. See Appendix C for a list of
the rules that may affect small entities, but which we do not
expect will have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of them.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) section 610 requires that
an agency review, within 10 years of promulgation, each rule that
has or will have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (SISNOSE). There are nine rules for which
we are conducting section 610 reviews this year. We undertake these
reviews to decide whether we should continue the rule unchanged,
amend it, or withdraw it. We announce our forthcoming section 610
reviews in the ``Prerule'' section of the Agenda. We encourage
small entities to provide comments on the need to change these
rules. We will consider all of your comments as we decide whether
to continue, amend, or withdraw these rules. We particularly
encourage comments by small entities about how these rules could be
made clearer, more effective, or remove conflicting or overlapping
requirements with other Federal or State regulations. The nine reviews are:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review RIN[greek-i]
and EDOCKET
ID[greek-i]
Rule Being Reviewed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2050-AG19; RCRA-2004-0004 Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III: Decharacterized Wastewaters,
Carbamate Wastes, and Spent Potliners
2050-AG17 RCRA-2004-0003 Land Disposal Restrictions Phase II: Universal Treatment Standards, and
Treatment Standards for Organic Toxicity Characteristic Wastes and Newly
Listed Wastes
2070-AD65; OPPT-2003-0015 Lead; Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Activities in Target Housing and
Child-Occupied Facilities
2070-AD66; OPP-2003-0115 Worker Protection Standards for Pesticides
2040-AD96; OW-2003-0016 Sewage Sludge Round 1
2060-AM39; OAR-2004-0054 Emission Standards for New Nonroad Spark-Ignition Engines At or Below 19
Kilowatts
2060-AM38; OAR-2004-0053 Fuels and Fuel Additives Registration Regulations
2060-AM41; OAR-2004-0055 NESHAP: Petroleum Refineries
2060-AM40; OAR-2004-0056 NESHAP: Secondary Lead Smelting
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has established an official public docket for each of these
610 Reviews under a docket identification (ID) number as indicated
above. The official public docket is the collection of materials
that is available for public viewing at the docket facility. An
electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's
electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket to submit or view
public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA
Dockets. Information claimed as confidential business information
(CBI) and other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will
not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be
placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only
in printed, paper form in the official public
[[Page 38158]]
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials
will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a
document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system
will identify whether the document is available for viewing in
EPA's electronic public docket. Although not all docket materials
may be available electronically, you may still access any of the
publicly available docket materials through the docket facility
identified above. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic
access to all of the publicly available docket materials through
EPA's electronic public docket.
Unless otherwise indicated, please direct your comments to the
identified Docket ID number for the specific 610 Review item. For
these 610 Reviews, please DO NOT submit CBI or information that is
otherwise protected by statute. You may submit comments
electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/courier using one
of the following methods:
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed
below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and
an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your
comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any
disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the
disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made
available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit
comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving
comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket, and
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the
system, select ``search,'' and then key in the appropriate Docket ID
number. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA
will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you mail to the mailing address identified below. These
electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII
file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption.
2. By Mail. Send your comments, identified by the appropriate Docket ID
number, to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection
Agency, Mailcode: [insert [greek-i]], 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW,
Washington, DC, 20460
3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments, identified by
the appropriate Docket ID number, to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA
West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1742. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation as identified below.
For public comments, it is important to note that EPA's policy
is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on
paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA's
electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change,
unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA
identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will
provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment
that is placed in EPA's electronic public docket. The entire
printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be
available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on
computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be
transferred to EPA's electronic public docket. Public comments that
are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in
EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects
will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA's
electronic public docket along with a brief description written by
the docket staff.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the
specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the
comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to
consider these late comments. For these actions, please DO NOT
submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute.
H. Acknowledgment of Those Involved in the Rulemaking Process
Finally, I would like to thank the members of the public who
have taken the time to get involved in the rulemaking process.
Experience has taught us that we must listen to and involve our
stakeholders if we hope to fully understand the issues and write
the most effective rules. Over the years you, the public, have
submitted an enormous number of comments on our rulemakings. We
have heard all of them and adopted many. Protecting human health
and the environment is one of our nation's most important quests.
We thank you for joining us in this endeavor.
Dated: May 17, 2004
Jessica L. Furey,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation.
GENERAL--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3040 SAN 3580. Incorporation of Class Deviations Into EPAAR................................ 2030-AA37
3041 SAN 4292. Proposed Revision to EPA's Implementing NEPA Regulations.................... 2020-AA42
[[Page 38159]]
3042 SAN 4693. Privacy Act Regulations (Revised)........................................... 2025-AA13
3043 SAN 4191. Revision to EPAAR 1552.211-73, Level of Effort.............................. 2030-AA64
3044 SAN 4319. Revisions to Acquisition Regulation Concerning Conflict of Interest......... 2030-AA67
3045 SAN 4742. Continuation of Implementing the Empowerment Initiative..................... 2030-AA81
3046 SAN 4814. On-Site and Off-Site Background Checks Performed by EPA and Contractors..... 2030-AA85
3047 SAN 4812. Contract Bundling Requirements.............................................. 2030-AA86
3048 SAN 4904. Security Requirements for Toxic Substances Control Act Confidential Business 2030-AA88
Information Access for Contractors....................................................
3049 SAN 4903. Award Term Contracting...................................................... 2030-AA89
3050 SAN 4761. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) FY 2002 Report to Congress............... 2060-AK79
3051 SAN 4463. Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) Pollutants Strategy............ 2070-AD45
3052 SAN 4836. Project XL Site Specific Rulemaking for the NASA White Sands Test Facility 2090-AA35
in Las Cruces, New Mexico (Phases III-VI).............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3053 SAN 4747. Implementation of Authority To Appoint Research Scientists Under 42 USC..... 2030-AA83
3054 SAN 4270. Cross-Media Electronic Reporting (ER) and Recordkeeping Rule (CROMERRR)..... 2025-AA07
3055 SAN 4733. Background Investigations for Contractors Performing Services Onsite........ 2030-AA80
3056 SAN 4813. Miscellaneous Revisions to EPAAR Clauses.................................... 2030-AA84
3057 SAN 4925. Technical Amendments to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human 2080-AA11
Subjects..............................................................................
3058 SAN 4536. Project XL Site Specific Rulemaking for NASA White Sands Test Facility 2090-AA27
Electronic Reporting in Las Cruces, New Mexico (Phases I and II)......................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3059 SAN 4056. Utilization of Small, Minority and Women's Business Enterprises in 2020-AA39
Procurement Under Assistance Agreements...............................................
3060 SAN 3240. Public Information and Confidentiality Regulations.......................... 2025-AA02
3061 SAN 3671. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment................................... 2080-AA06
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3062 SAN 4842. Report to Congress on Enforcement Data Concerning Small Entities............ 2020-AA45
3063 SAN 4473. Regulatory Incentives for the National Environmental Performance Track 2090-AA13
Program...............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3064 SAN 4699. Revisions to Clarify the Scope of Certain Monitoring Requirements for 2060-AK29
Federal and State Operating Permits Programs..........................................
3065 SAN 4759. Revision to Policy on Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)........... 2060-AK75
3066 SAN 4871. Control of Emissions From New Locomotives and New Marine Diesel Engines Less 2060-AM06
Than 30 Liters per Cylinder...........................................................
[[Page 38160]]
3067 SAN 4922. Fuels and Fuel Additives Registration Regulations (Section 610 Review)...... 2060-AM38
3068 SAN 4921. Emission Standards for New Nonroad Spark-Ignition Engines At or Below 19 2060-AM39
Kilowatts (Section 610 Review)........................................................
3069 SAN 4924. NESHAP: Secondary Lead Smelting (Section 610 Review)........................ 2060-AM40
3070 SAN 4923. NESHAP: Petroleum Refineries (Section 610 Review)........................... 2060-AM41
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3071 SAN 4266. Review National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide........... 2060-AI43
3072 SAN 4255. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. 2060-AI44
3073 SAN 3649. Amendments to Method 24 (Water-Based Coatings).............................. 2060-AF72
3074 SAN 4070. General Conformity Regulations; Revisions................................... 2060-AH93
3075 SAN 3939. NESHAP: Group I Polymers and Resins and Group IV Polymers and Resins- 2060-AH47
Amendments............................................................................
3076 SAN 3751. NSPS and Emission Guidelines for Other Solid Waste Incinerators............. 2060-AG31
3077 SAN 3975. Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country................... 2060-AH37
3078 SAN 4752. Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule................................. 2060-AK74
3079 SAN 3380. NSPS: SOCMI--Wastewater and Amendment to Appendix C of Part 63 and Appendix 2060-AE94
J of Part 60..........................................................................
3080 SAN 4119. Performance Specification 16 - Specifications and Test Procedures for 2060-AH84
Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources..........................
3081 SAN 4478. Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Municipal Solid Waste 2060-AJ41
Landfills: Amendment..................................................................
3082 SAN 4310. NESHAP: Printing and Publishing Industry; Amendments........................ 2060-AI66
3083 SAN 4585. Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry NESHAP: Amendment to Implement Court 2060-AJ78
Remand................................................................................
3084 SAN 4620. National Emission Standards for Coke Oven Batteries - Residual Risk 2060-AJ96
Standards.............................................................................
3085 SAN 4655. NESHAP: Gasoline Distribution (Stage I) Residual Risk Standards............. 2060-AK10
3086 SAN 4660. NESHAP: Industrial Process Cooling Towers Residual Risk Standards........... 2060-AK16
3087 SAN 4662. NESHAP: Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities Residual Risk Standards... 2060-AK18
3088 SAN 4667. NESHAP: Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations -- Residual Risk Standards.. 2060-AK21
3089 SAN 4782. Petition To Delist Hazardous Air Pollutant: 4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl 2060-AK84
Diisocyanate..........................................................................
3090 SAN 4309. National VOC Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Proposed Amendments.. 2060-AI62
3091 SAN 4748. Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources..................... 2060-AK70
3092 SAN 4535. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Critical Uses of 2060-AJ63
Methyl Bromide........................................................................
3093 SAN 4599. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone- 2060-AK26
Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide................................................
3094 SAN 4697. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjusting Allowances for Class I 2060-AK45
Substances for Export to Article 5 Countries..........................................
3095 SAN 4542. Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the Billings/Laurel, Montana Sulfur 2008-AA00
Dioxide (SO2) Area....................................................................
3096 SAN 3262. Inspection/Maintenance Recall Requirements.................................. 2060-AE22
3097 SAN 4421. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Regulations: Revisions....................... 2060-AJ25
3098 SAN 4570. Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles and Engines: Alternative Low- 2060-AJ72
Sulfur Highway Diesel Fuel Transition Program for Alaska..............................
3099 SAN 4547. Modification of Authority to Grant Alternative Method Approvals............. 2060-AJ83
3100 SAN 4584. Performance Specifications for Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems...... 2060-AJ86
3101 SAN 4632. Modification of Anti-dumping Baselines for Gasoline Produced or Imported for 2060-AK02
Use in Hawaii, Alaska and the U.S. Territories........................................
3102 SAN 4633. Performance-Based Measurement System For Fuels: Criteria For Self-Qualifying 2060-AK03
Alternative Test Methods; Description of Optional Statistical Quality Control Measures
3103 SAN 4634. Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Extension of California Enforcement 2060-AK04
Exemptions for Reformulated Gasoline to California Phase 3 Gasoline...................
3104 SAN 4811. 20 Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments for New 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 2060-AL73
National Ambient Air Quality Standards................................................
3105 SAN 4793. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source 2060-AL75
Review (NSR): Allowables Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL), Aggregation, and
Debottlenecking.......................................................................
3106 SAN 4794. Clean Air Interstate Rule; Formerly Titled Interstate Air Quality Rule...... 2060-AL76
3107 SAN 4095.1. Section 126 Rule: Lifting the 8-Hour Stay................................. 2060-AL79
3108 SAN 4796. Section 126 Rule: Withdrawal of Findings for Sources in Michigan............ 2060-AL83
[[Page 38161]]
3109 SAN 4797. Lifting the Stay of the Eight-Hour Portion of the Findings of Significant 2060-AL84
Contribution and Rulemaking for Purposes of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport (NOx
SIP Call).............................................................................
3110 SAN 4802. Amendments to Leather Finishing NESHAP...................................... 2060-AL89
3111 SAN 4804. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Allowance System for Controlling HCFC 2060-AL90
Production, Import and Export; Correction.............................................
3112 SAN 4808. Amendments to the NESHAP for Cellulose Products Manufacturing............... 2060-AL91
3113 SAN 4809. Control of Emissions of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: On-Board 2060-AL92
Diagnostic Requirements for Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles Above 14,000 Pounds and In-
Use, Not-To-Exceed Emission Standard Test.............................................
3114 SAN 4820. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Quantity Allocation of Methyl Bromide for 2060-AL95
Critical Use Exemptions After the Phaseout............................................
3115 SAN 4829. 5-Year Review of MACT Standards for Large MWC............................... 2060-AL97
3116 SAN 4830. Alternative Work Practice for Leak Detection and Repair..................... 2060-AL98
3117 SAN 4846. NESHAP: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills--Amendments......................... 2060-AM08
3118 SAN 4844. Addition of CO Emission Limit for Large MWC Using Fluid Bed Combustion 2060-AM11
Technology (Section 129)..............................................................
3119 SAN 4859. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Ethylene Oxide Hospital Sterilization........ 2060-AM14
3120 SAN 4851. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Restriction on the Sales of Pre-Charged 2060-AM15
Split Systems.........................................................................
3121 SAN 4845. Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles: In-Use, Not-To-Exceed 2060-AM17
Emission Standard Testing for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles..................
3122 SAN 4849. Petition To Delist a Hazardous Air Pollutant From Section 112 of the Clean 2060-AM20
Air Act: Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK)................................................
3123 SAN 4854. Amendments to Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Requirements To 2060-AM21
Address New 8-Hour Ozone Standard.....................................................
3124 SAN 4867. NESHAP: Hydrochloric Acid Production Amendments............................. 2060-AM25
3125 SAN 4865. Strategy for Addressing Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations........ 2060-AM26
3126 SAN 4853. Requirements for Transmix Processing and Blending Under the Reformulated 2060-AM27
Gasoline and Gasoline Sulfur Rules....................................................
3127 SAN 4866. NESHAP: Site Remediation; Amendments........................................ 2060-AM30
3128 SAN 4868. Exemption of Area Sources From Title V Operating Permit Program............. 2060-AM31
3129 SAN 4880. Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle 2060-AM32
Engines: Amendments to Evaporative Emissions Regulations and Technical Amendments.....
3130 SAN 4881. Prevention of Significant Deterioration for Nitrogen Oxides................. 2060-AM33
3131 SAN 4882. Control of Emissions from Spark-Ignition Engines and Fuel Systems From 2060-AM34
Marine Vessels and Small Equipment....................................................
3132 SAN 4883. Test Procedures for Highway and Nonroad Engines............................. 2060-AM35
3133 SAN 4891. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous 2060-AM43
Organic Chemical Manufacturing; Amendments............................................
3134 SAN 4885. Flexible Air Permit Rule.................................................... 2060-AM45
3135 SAN 4905. National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Architectural 2060-AM47
Coatings; Amendments..................................................................
3136 SAN 4899. Control of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel Lubricity........................... 2060-AM48
3137 SAN 4916. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Refrigerant Recycling; Certification of 2060-AM49
Recovery and Recovery/Recycling Equipment Intended for Use with Substitute
Refrigerants..........................................................................
3138 SAN 4893. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Essential Use Allowances 2060-AM50
for Calendar Year 2005................................................................
3139 SAN 4901. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Modifications to the Technician 2060-AM55
Certification Requirements Under Section 608 of the Clean Air Act.....................
3140 SAN 4894. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Extension of the Laboratory and 2060-AM56
Analytical Use Exemption for Essential Class I Ozone Depleting Substances.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3141 SAN 4315. Source-Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Navajo Generating Station; 2009-AA00
Navajo Nation.........................................................................
3142 SAN 3569. Source-Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Navajo Generating Station; 2009-AA01
Four Corners Power Plant..............................................................
3143 SAN 4768. Amendment to Subparts H and I for Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than 2060-AK81
Radon from DOE Facilities.............................................................
3144 SAN 3470.1. Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models (Appendix W to 40 CFR Part 2060-AK60
51): Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and Complex Terrain) Dispersion
Model and Other Revisions.............................................................
[[Page 38162]]
3145 SAN 3656. NESHAP: Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine............................ 2060-AG63
3146 SAN 3837. NESHAP: Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters 2060-AG69
3147 SAN 3525. Prot. of Strat. Ozone: Update of the Substitutes List Under (SNAP) Program.. 2060-AG12
3148 SAN 4683. Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds - 2060-AK37
Exclusion of 4 Compounds..............................................................
3149 SAN 2915. Methods for Measurement of Visible Emissions--Addition of Methods 203A, 2060-AF83
203B, and 203C to Appendix M of Part 51...............................................
3150 SAN 3900. Addition of Method 207 to Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51 Method for Measuring 2060-AG88
Isocyanates in Stationary Source Emissions............................................
3151 SAN 4625. Clean Air Ozone Implementation Rule (Part 1 and 2).......................... 2060-AJ99
3152 SAN 3958. Amendments to Standard of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Monitoring 2060-AH23
Requirements (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix F, Procedure 3)................................
3153 SAN 4555. Electric Arc Furnace NSPS Amendment......................................... 2060-AJ68
3154 SAN 4681. Revision of Combustion Turbines NSPS--Part 60, Subpart GG................... 2060-AK35
3155 SAN 4161. Update of Continuous Instrumental Test Methods.............................. 2060-AK61
3156 SAN 3820. NESHAP: Plywood and Composite Wood Products................................. 2060-AG52
3157 SAN 4115. NESHAP: Chromium Electroplating Amendment................................... 2060-AH69
3158 SAN 4107. NESHAP: Asphalt/Coal Tar Application on Metal Pipes......................... 2060-AH78
3159 SAN 4313. Petitions To Delist Hazardous Air Pollutants: MEK........................... 2060-AI72
3160 SAN 4571. Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit MACT Regulation...................... 2060-AJ65
3161 SAN 4672. NESHAP: Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil: Amendments.................... 2060-AK32
3162 SAN 4712. NESHAP: Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) Amendments........................... 2060-AK49
3163 SAN 4713. NESHAP for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants; Amendments.................... 2060-AK50
3164 SAN 4714. NESHAP for Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic 2060-AK51
Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units; Amendments................................
3165 SAN 4719. NESHAP: General Provisions; Amendments for Pollution Prevention Alternative 2060-AK54
Compliance Requirements...............................................................
3166 SAN 4751. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary 2060-AK73
Combustion Turbines--Petition to Delist...............................................
3167 SAN 4763. NESHAP: Ethylene Processes; Amendments...................................... 2060-AK80
3168 SAN 4464. Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions from New York and Connecticut Regarding 2060-AJ36
Sources in Michigan; Revision of Definition of Applicable Requirement for Title V
Operating Permit Programs.............................................................
3169 SAN 4689. Section 126 Rule Withdrawal Provision....................................... 2060-AK41
3170 SAN 4340. Transportation Conformity Amendments: Response to March 2, 1999, Court 2060-AI56
Decision..............................................................................
3171 SAN 4030. Expanded Definitions for Alternative-Fueled Vehicles and Engines Meeting Low- 2060-AH52
Emission Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards...........................................
3172 SAN 4604. Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data Used 2060-AJ82
in Development of an Individual Baseline..............................................
3173 SAN 4675. Control of Emissions of Air Pollution From Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel.. 2060-AK27
3174 SAN 4757. Emissions Durability Procedures for New Light-Duty Vehicles and Light-Duty 2060-AK76
Trucks................................................................................
3175 SAN 2665. Importation of Nonconforming Vehicles; Amendments to Regulations............ 2060-AI03
3176 SAN 4682. Revisions to the Appeal Procedures and the Federal NOx Budget Trading 2060-AK36
Program, Parts 78 and 97..............................................................
3177 SAN 4487. Federal Implementation Plans for Indian Reservations in Idaho, Oregon and 2012-AA01
Washington............................................................................
3178 SAN 4254. Revision to the Definition of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) to Exclude 2060-AI45
Tertiary Butyl Acetate................................................................
3179 SAN 4450. Clean Air Visibility Rule................................................... 2060-AJ31
3180 SAN 4621. Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources: Default Baseline 2060-AJ97
Revision and Minor Corrections........................................................
3181 SAN 4631. Adoption of the Amended International NOx Standard for Aircraft Engines..... 2060-AK01
3182 SAN 4722. California Gasoline Technical Correction.................................... 2060-AK56
3183 SAN 4706. Anti-Dumping Baseline Recalculation for Downstream Oxygenate Addition....... 2060-AK69
3184 SAN 4758. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to Standards and 2060-AK77
Requirements for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Including Butane Blenders and
Attest Engagements....................................................................
3185 SAN 3560.1. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Refrigerant Recycling; Certification of 2060-AL77
Recovery and Recovery/Recycling Equipment Intended for Use with Substitute
Refrigerants..........................................................................
3186 SAN 4800. Consideration of Industry Petition to Remove Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether 2060-AL87
from the Clean Air Act List of Hazardous Air Pollutants...............................
3187 SAN 4819. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Emergency Uses of 2060-AL94
Methyl Bromide........................................................................
3188 SAN 4837. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Amendment to 2060-AM02
Reflect Court Order Vacating Certain Rules............................................
3189 SAN 4839. Clean Air Ozone Designations................................................ 2060-AM03
[[Page 38163]]
3190 SAN 4840. Clean Air Fine Particle Designations........................................ 2060-AM04
3191 SAN 3560.2. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Refrigerant Recycling; Substitute 2060-AM05
Refrigerants; Leak Repair Requirements for Refrigeration and Air-conditioning
Equipment.............................................................................
3192 SAN 4863. NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic Composites--Amendments........................... 2060-AM23
3193 SAN 4857. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone- 2060-AM24
Depleting Substances--Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection.......................
3194 SAN 4864. NESHAP: Surface Coating of Metal Cans--Amendments........................... 2060-AM28
3195 SAN 4862. NESHAP: Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles-- 2060-AM29
Amendments............................................................................
3196 SAN 4895. Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Gasoline and Diesel Test Methods..... 2060-AM42
3197 SAN 4900. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Import Petitioning Requirements for Halon- 2060-AM46
1301 Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Vessels..............................................
3198 SAN 4892. National Emission Standards for Pharmaceuticals Production; Amendments...... 2060-AM52
3199 SAN 4918. Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Alternatives for the Mobile Air 2060-AM54
Conditioning Sector Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program......
3200 SAN 4816. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Site-Specific 2090-AA33
Regulation for Packaging Corporation of America in Tomahawk, Wisconsin................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3201 SAN 4695. NESHAP: Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations Residual Risk Standard....... 2060-AK68
3202 SAN 4607. Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under 2050-AE95
the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(7); Availability of Information to the Public;
Technical Amendment...................................................................
3203 SAN 4619. Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs under 2050-AE96
the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(3); Revisions to the List of Substances.............
3204 SAN 4531. Evaluation of Updated Test Procedures for the Certification of Gasoline 2060-AJ61
Deposit Control Additives.............................................................
3205 SAN 1002. NAAQS: Sulfur Dioxide (Response to Remand).................................. 2060-AA61
3206 SAN 3919. Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality: Permit Application 2060-AH01
Review Procedures for Non-Federal Class I Areas.......................................
3207 SAN 4096. Phase I (FIP) To Reduce the Regional Transport of Ozone in the Eastern 2060-AH87
United States.........................................................................
3208 SAN 4653. NESHAP: Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Residual Risk 2060-AK08
Standards.............................................................................
3209 SAN 4654. NESHAP: Ethylene Oxide for Sterilization Facilities - Residual Risk 2060-AK09
Standards.............................................................................
3210 SAN 4657. NESHAP: Group II Polymers and Resins - Residual Risk Standards.............. 2060-AK13
3211 SAN 4661. NESHAP: National Emission Standards for Marine Tank Vessel Loading 2060-AK17
Operations - Residual Risk Standard...................................................
3212 SAN 4665. NESHAP: Secondary Lead Smelting Residual Risk Standards..................... 2060-AK19
3213 SAN 4666. NESHAP: Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Surface Coating -- Residual Risk 2060-AK20
Standards.............................................................................
3214 SAN 4668. NESHAP: Halogenated Solvent Cleaning - Residual Risk Standards.............. 2060-AK22
3215 SAN 4669. NESHAP: Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations Residual Risk Standard....... 2060-AK23
3216 SAN 4664. NESHAP: Printing and Publishing Industry - Residual Risk Standards.......... 2060-AK24
3217 SAN 4663. NESHAP: Petroleum Refineries--Residual Risk Standards....................... 2060-AK25
3218 SAN 4750. National Emission Standards for Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative 2060-AK72
Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks - Residual Risk Standards........
3219 SAN 4656. NESHAP: Group I Polymers and Resins -- Residual Risk Standards.............. 2060-AK12
3220 SAN 4659. NESHAP: Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) Residual Risk Standards.............. 2060-AK14
3221 SAN 4658. NESHAP: Group IV Polymers and Resins--Residual Risk Standards............... 2060-AK15
3222 SAN 4383. Interstate Ozone Transport: Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions From the 2060-AI99
District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey..............................
3223 SAN 3910. Streamlined Evaporative Test Procedures..................................... 2060-AH34
3224 SAN 4393. Control of Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)............................... 2060-AJ00
3225 SAN 3412. Operating Permits: Revisions (Part 70)...................................... 2060-AF70
3226 SAN 3922. Revised Permit Revision Procedures for the Federal Operating Permits Program- 2060-AG92
Part 71...............................................................................
3227 SAN 4700. Selection of Sequence of Mandatory Sanctions to be Applied Pursuant to 2060-AK46
Section 502 of the Clean Air Act......................................................
3228 SAN 3263. Performance Warranty and Inspection/Maintenance Test Procedures............. 2060-AE20
3229 SAN 3917. Transportation Conformity Rule Amendment: Clarification of Trading 2060-AH31
Provisions............................................................................
[[Page 38164]]
3230 SAN 4348. Inspection Maintenance Program Requirements for Federal Facilities; 2060-AI97
Amendment to the Final Rule...........................................................
3231 SAN 4391. Rescinding Finding That Preexisting PM10 Standards No Longer Applicable in 2060-AJ05
Northern Ada County/Boise, Idaho......................................................
3232 SAN 4691. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source 2060-AK42
Review (NSR): Clean Units.............................................................
3233 SAN 4557.1. Amendments to the Requirements on Variability in the Composition of 2060-AK62
Additives Certified Under the Gasoline Deposit Control Program........................
3234 SAN 4783. Voluntary Superior Monitoring............................................... 2060-AK85
3235 SAN 4798. Deferral of Effective Date of Nonattainment Designations for 8-hour Ozone 2060-AL85
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Early Action Compact Areas.................
3236 SAN 4799. Consideration of Industry Petition To Remove the 2-Piece Can Subcategory 2060-AL86
From the Clean Air Act Hazardous Air Pollutant Source Category List...................
3237 SAN 4810. NESHAP: Ferroalloys Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese Residual 2060-AL93
Risk Standards........................................................................
3238 SAN 4825. Mineral Wool Production Residual Risk Standard.............................. 2060-AL96
3239 SAN 4831. NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production: Residual Risk Standards... 2060-AL99
3240 SAN 4832. NESHAP: Pharmaceuticals Production: Residual Risk Standards................. 2060-AM00
3241 SAN 4861. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Paint Stripping.............................. 2060-AM07
3242 SAN 4856. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair 2060-AM09
Regulations...........................................................................
3243 SAN 4855. NESHAP: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing--Amendments.... 2060-AM10
3244 SAN 4873. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Glass Manufacturing Industry................. 2060-AM12
3245 SAN 4860. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Acrylic/ Modacrylic Fiber (AMF) Production... 2060-AM13
3246 SAN 4875. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Oil and Natural Gas Production............... 2060-AM16
3247 SAN 4847. NESHAP: Oil and Natural Gas Production Residual Risk Standards.............. 2060-AM18
3248 SAN 4874. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Industrial Inorganic Chemicals Manufacturing. 2060-AM19
3249 SAN 4848. NESHAP: Total Facility Low Risk Determination (TFLRD) for Residual Risk..... 2060-AM22
3250 SAN 4879. Area Source National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 2060-AM36
(NESHAP) for Iron and Steel Foundries.................................................
3251 SAN 4886. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Plating and Polishing........................ 2060-AM37
3252 SAN 4884. Area Source National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 2060-AM44
(NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers........................
3253 SAN 4917. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Substitute Refrigerant Recycling; 2060-AM51
Amendment to the Definition of Refrigerant............................................
3254 SAN 4906. NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Clay Ceramics Industry....................... 2060-AM53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3255 SAN 4755. Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050-AF09
Requirements Under Clean Air Act Section 112(r)(7); Amendments to the Submission
Schedule and Data Requirements........................................................
3256 SAN 4415. Petitions to Delist Source Categories from the Source Category List, 2060-AJ23
Developed Pursuant to Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act.............................
3257 SAN 4532. Motor Vehicle and Engine Compliance Program Fees for: Light-Duty Vehicles 2060-AJ62
and Trucks; Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Engines; Nonroad Engines; and Motorcycles.........
3258 SAN 3657. NESHAP: Combustion Turbine.................................................. 2060-AG67
3259 SAN 3343. NESHAP: Iron and Steel Foundries............................................ 2060-AE43
3260 SAN 3452. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous 2060-AE82
Organic Chemical Manufacturing........................................................
3261 SAN 2841. NESHAP: Chromium Electroplating Amendment (Tin-Free Steel).................. 2060-AH08
3262 SAN 3452.1. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous 2060-AK59
Coating Manufacturing.................................................................
3263 SAN 4433. Interstate Ozone Transport: Response to Court Decisions on the NOx SIP Call, 2060-AJ16
NOx SIP Call Technical Amendments, and Section 126 Rules..............................
3264 SAN 4508. Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Volatile Organic Liquid 2060-AJ53
Storage Vessels; Amendments...........................................................
3265 SAN 4605. Proposed Amendments to Performance Standards and Monitoring Requirements for 2060-AJ88
Particulate Matter at Stationary Sources..............................................
3266 SAN 3449. NESHAP: Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants.................................... 2060-AE85
[[Page 38165]]
3267 SAN 3825. NESHAP: Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products (Surface Coating)............ 2060-AG56
3268 SAN 3651. NESHAP: Lime Manufacturing.................................................. 2060-AG72
3269 SAN 3906. NESHAP: Surface Coating of Metal Cans....................................... 2060-AG96
3270 SAN 3907. NESHAP: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks................ 2060-AG99
3271 SAN 3924. NESHAP: Primary Magnesium Refining.......................................... 2060-AH03
3272 SAN 3968. NESHAP: Site Remediation.................................................... 2060-AH12
3273 SAN 3971. NESHAP: Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline)......................... 2060-AH41
3274 SAN 4380. NESHAP: Taconite Iron Ore Processing Industry............................... 2060-AJ02
3275 SAN 4426. Clarification to Existing Part 63 NESHAP Delegations' Provisions............ 2060-AJ26
3276 SAN 4479. NESHAP: Gasoline Distribution Facilities--Amendment......................... 2060-AJ42
3277 SAN 4591. Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP; Amendments................................. 2060-AJ87
3278 SAN 4685. NESHAP: Chlorine Production................................................. 2060-AK38
3279 SAN 4785. NESHAP: Perchlorethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (Completion of a Section 2060-AK64
610 Review)...........................................................................
3280 SAN 4441. Federal Plan Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste 2060-AJ28
Incineration Units Constructed On or Before November 30, 1999.........................
3281 SAN 4626. Control of Emissions from Highway Motorcycles............................... 2060-AJ90
3282 SAN 4756. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Ban on Trade of Methyl Bromide to Non- 2060-AK67
Parties to the Montreal Protocol......................................................
3283 SAN 3556. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Supplemental Rule Regarding a Recycling 2060-AF36
Standard Under Section 608............................................................
3284 SAN 3560. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Refrigerant Recycling; Substitute 2060-AF37
Refrigerants..........................................................................
3285 SAN 3673. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Reconsideration of Section 608 Sales 2060-AG20
Restriction...........................................................................
3286 SAN 4548. Compilation of Source-Specific Alternative Methods Being Approved for Source- 2060-AJ84
Category Wide Application.............................................................
3287 SAN 4569.1. Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles; Addendum to Second 2060-AK63
Amendment to the Tier 2/Gasoline Sulfur Regulations...................................
3288 SAN 4622.1. Amendment to Marine Diesel Rule........................................... 2060-AL81
3289 SAN 4791. Revisions to Federal Operating Permits Program Fee Payment Deadlines for 2060-AL82
California Agricultural Sources.......................................................
3290 SAN 4801. Amendments to the Phase 2 Requirements for Spark-Ignition Nonroad Engines 2060-AL88
less than 19 Kilowatts................................................................
3291 SAN 4833. Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Essential Use Allowances 2060-AM01
for Calendar Year 2004................................................................
3292 SAN 4278. Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Andersen Corporation's Facility in 2090-AA21
Bayport, Minnesota....................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3293 SAN 4054. Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Disposal of Low- 2060-AH63
Activity Mixed Radioactive Waste......................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3294 SAN 4403. Revision of the 40 CFR Part 194 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance 2060-AJ07
Criteria..............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3295 SAN 4003. Technical Change to Dose Methodology for 40 CFR Part 190, Subpart B and 40 2060-AH90
CFR 191, Subpart A....................................................................
[[Page 38166]]
3296 SAN 4054.1. Approaches to an Integrated Framework for Management and Disposal of Low- 2060-AL78
Activity Radioactive Waste: Request for Comment.......................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3297 SAN 4686. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) FY 2001 Report to Congress............... 2060-AK39
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3298 SAN 4727. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP); Chemical Selection Approach 2070-AD59
for Initial Round of Screening........................................................
3299 SAN 4789. Pesticide Worker Protection Rule (Section 610 Review)....................... 2070-AD66
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3300 SAN 2687. Pesticides; Data Requirements for Conventional Chemicals.................... 2070-AC12
3301 SAN 4173. Pesticides; Data Requirements for Antimicrobials............................ 2070-AD30
3302 SAN 4728. Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program (EDSP); Implementing the Screening and 2070-AD61
Testing Phase.........................................................................
3303 SAN 4170. Pesticides; Procedures for the Registration Review Program.................. 2070-AD29
3304 SAN 4216. Pesticides; Emergency Exemption Process Revisions........................... 2070-AD36
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3305 SAN 2659. Pesticide Management and Disposal; Standards for Pesticide Containers and 2070-AB95
Containment...........................................................................
3306 SAN 3731. WPS; Pesticide Worker Protection Standard (WPS); Glove Amendment............ 2070-AC93
3307 SAN 3892. Pesticides; Registration Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide Products.. 2070-AD14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3308 SAN 4596. Pesticides; Data Requirements for Biochemical and Microbial Products........ 2070-AD51
3309 SAN 4027. Pesticides; Tolerance Processing Fees....................................... 2070-AD23
3310 SAN 4175. Pesticide Tolerance Reassessment Program.................................... 2070-AD24
3311 SAN 4602. Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for those Based on Viral 2070-AD49
Coat Proteins.........................................................................
3312 SAN 4611. Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Derived Through 2070-AD55
Genetic Engineering From Sexually Compatible Plants...................................
3313 SAN 4612. Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for PIPs that Act by 2070-AD56
Primarily Affecting the Plant.........................................................
3314 SAN 4610. Acceptability of Research Using Human Subjects.............................. 2070-AD57
3315 SAN 4618. Revision of Procedural Rules for Hearings on Cancellations, Suspensions, 2020-AA44
Changes in Classifications, and Denials of Pesticide Registrations....................
[[Page 38167]]
3316 SAN 3222. Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule.............................. 2070-AC46
3317 SAN 4609. Pesticides; Exemption of Medical Devices Treated with Antimicrobial 2070-AD54
Pesticides............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3318 SAN 4876. Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP).................... 2070-AC27
3319 SAN 4788. Lead; Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Activities in Target Housing and 2070-AD65
Child-Occupied Facilities (Section 610 Review)........................................
3320 SAN 4858. Notification of Chemical Exports Under TSCA Section 12(b)................... 2070-AJ01
3321 SAN 3557.1. Lead-Based Paint Activities; Voluntary Program for Renovation and 2070-AJ03
Remodeling............................................................................
3322 SAN 4878. TSCA Inventory Nomenclature for Enzymes and Proteins........................ 2070-AJ04
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3323 SAN 4635. Amendment to the Premanufacture Notification Exemptions; Revisions of 2070-AD58
Exemptions for Polymers...............................................................
3324 SAN 2563. Test Rule; Certain Chemicals on the ATSDR Priority List of Hazardous 2070-AB79
Substances............................................................................
3325 SAN 4395. Test Rule; Multiple Substance Rule for the Testing of Developmental and 2070-AD44
Reproductive Toxicity.................................................................
3326 SAN 3301.1. TSCA Inventory Update Rule Revisions...................................... 2070-AD63
3327 SAN 1923. Follow-Up Rules on Existing Chemicals....................................... 2070-AA58
3328 SAN 4512. Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Selected Flame Retardant Chemical 2070-AD48
Substances for Use in Residential Upholstered Furniture...............................
3329 SAN 4870. Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Pentabromodiphenylether and 2070-AJ02
Octabromodiphenylether................................................................
3330 SAN 2150.1. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Exemption Request From U.S. Maritime 2070-AJ05
Administration (MARAD)................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3331 SAN 1976. Significant New Use Rules (SNURs); Follow-Up Rules on Non-5(e) New Chemical 2070-AA59
Substances............................................................................
3332 SAN 3495. Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Chemical-Specific SNURs To Extend 2070-AB27
Provisions of Section 5(e) Orders.....................................................
3333 SAN 3493. Test Rules and Enforceable Consent Agreements Under the Toxic Substances 2070-AB94
Control Act (Generic Entry)...........................................................
3334 SAN 3990. Test Rule; Testing of Certain High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals........ 2070-AD16
3335 SAN 2178. TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rules.................. 2070-AB08
3336 SAN 1139. TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules.................... 2070-AB11
3337 SAN 3493.1. Testing Agreement for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)....................... 2070-AJ06
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3338 SAN 3148. Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan Revisions................................. 2070-AC51
3339 SAN 3252. Lead Fishing Sinkers; Response to Citizens Petition and Proposed Ban........ 2070-AC21
3340 SAN 4376. Lead-Based Paint Activities; Training, Accreditation, and Certification Rule 2070-AC64
and Model State Plan Rule--Bridges and Structures.....................................
3341 SAN 3508. Lead; Management and Disposal of Lead-Based Paint Debris.................... 2070-AC72
[[Page 38168]]
3342 SAN 3557. Lead-Based Paint Activities; Abatement Amendments for Renovation and 2070-AC83
Remodeling............................................................................
3343 SAN 2150. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Exemptions From the Prohibitions Against 2070-AB20
Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce...............................
3344 SAN 4597. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Disposal of PCBs; Implementation Issues... 2070-AD52
3345 SAN 3487. Test Rule; Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs).................................. 2070-AC76
3346 SAN 3882. Test Rule; Certain Metals................................................... 2070-AD10
3347 SAN 4174. Testing Agreement for Certain Oxygenated Fuel Additives..................... 2070-AD28
3348 SAN 3528. Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Refractory Ceramic Fibers (RCFs)........... 2070-AC37
3349 SAN 4176. Voluntary High Production Volume (HPV) Chemical Challenge Program........... 2070-AD25
3350 SAN 4598. TSCA Policy Statement on Oversight of Transgenic Organisms (Including 2070-AD53
Plants)...............................................................................
3351 SAN 4777. Lead; Amendments to Requirements for Disclosure of Known Lead-Based Paint or 2070-AD64
Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Target Housing............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3352 SAN 4172. Lead; Notification Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Abatement Activities 2070-AD31
and Training..........................................................................
3353 SAN 4425. Test Rule; In Vitro Dermal Absorption Rate Testing of Certain Chemicals of 2070-AD42
Interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.........................
3354 SAN No. 3118 TSCA Section 8(e) Policy; Notice of Clarification........................ 2070-AC80
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3355 SAN 4753. Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: Modification to the 2050-AF08
Threshold Planning Quantity Methodology for the Extremely Hazardous Substances that
are Solids in Solution................................................................
3356 SAN 4692. Addition of Toxicity Equivalency (TEQ) Reporting and Quantity Data for 2025-AA12
Individual Members of the Dioxin and Dioxin-like Compounds Category Under EPCRA,
Section 313...........................................................................
3357 SAN 4896. Toxics Release Inventory Reporting Burden Reduction Rule.................... 2025-AA14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3358 SAN 3994. Response to a Petition Requesting Deletion of Phosmet From the Extremely 2050-AE42
Hazardous Substances (EHS) List.......................................................
3359 SAN 4595. Rulemaking to Change Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting Requirements 2025-AA10
From Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes to North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) Codes...................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3360 SAN 3215. Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: Amendments and 2050-AE17
Streamlining Rule.....................................................................
3361 SAN 4015. TRI; Review of Chemicals on the Original TRI List........................... 2025-AA03
3362 SAN 2425. TRI; Responses to Petitions Received To Add or Delete or Modify Chemical 2025-AA00
Listings on the Toxic Release Inventory...............................................
3363 SAN 4265. TRI; Revisions to the Otherwise Use Activity Exemptions and the Coal 2025-AA06
Extraction Activities Exemption.......................................................
3364 SAN 2847. TRI; Pollution Prevention Act Information Requirements...................... 2025-AA09
[[Page 38169]]
3365 SAN 4616. Clarify TRI Reporting Obligations Under EPCRA Section 313 for the Metal 2025-AA11
Mining Activities of Extraction and Beneficiation.....................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3366 SAN 4781. Trade Secrecy Claims for Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know 2050-AF10
Information; and Trade Secret Disclosures to Health Professionals; Amendment..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3367 SAN 4898. Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III: Decharacterized Wastewaters, Carbamate 2050-AG17
Wastes, and Spent Potliners (Section 610 Review)......................................
3368 SAN 4897. Land Disposal Restrictions Phase II: Universal Treatment Standards, and 2050-AG19
Treatment Standards for Organic Toxicity Characteristic Wastes and Newly Listed Wastes
(Section 610 Review)..................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3369 SAN 4230. Revisions to Solid Waste Landfill Criteria--Leachate Recirculation on 2050-AE67
Alternative Liners....................................................................
3370 SAN 4606. Revisions for Transboundary Shipments of Hazardous Waste for Recovery Within 2050-AE93
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.............................
3371 SAN 2647. RCRA Subtitle C Financial Test Criteria (Revision).......................... 2050-AC71
3372 SAN 4743. Land Disposal Restrictions: Determination of Equivalent Treatment for 2050-AF12
Macroencapsulation of Radioactive Lead Solids; Definition of Macroencapsulation.......
3373 SAN 4828. RCRA Incentives for Performance Track Members............................... 2090-AA34
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3374 SAN 4028. Standardized Permit for RCRA Hazardous Waste Management Facilities.......... 2050-AE44
3375 SAN 3545. Revisions to the Comprehensive Guideline for Procurement of Products 2050-AE23
Containing Recovered Materials........................................................
3376 SAN 3989. Methods Innovation Rule..................................................... 2050-AE41
3377 SAN 3147. Hazardous Waste Manifest Regulation......................................... 2050-AE21
3378 SAN 4084. Office of Solid Waste Burden Reduction Initiative........................... 2050-AE50
3379 SAN 3066. Listing Determination and LDR for Wastes Generated During the Manufacture of 2050-AD80
Azo, Anthraquinone, and Triarylmethane Dyes and Pigments..............................
3380 SAN 4092. Recycling of Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) and Mercury-Containing Equipment: 2050-AE52
Changes to Hazardous Waste Regulations................................................
3381 SAN 4501. Revision of Wastewater Treatment Exemptions for Hazardous Waste Mixtures.... 2050-AE84
3382 SAN 3333. NESHAPS: Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste 2050-AE01
Combustors............................................................................
3383 SAN 4439. Project XL -- Ortho-McNeil Pilot Project Allowing On-Site Treatment of Low- 2090-AA14
Level Mixed Wastes Without RCRA Permit................................................
[[Page 38170]]
3384 SAN 4565. Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for the IBM Semiconductor Manufacturing 2090-AA29
Facility in Hopewell Junction, New York...............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3385 SAN 3856. Management of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD)........................................ 2050-AE34
3386 SAN 4470. Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes Generated by 2050-AE81
Commercial Electric Power Producers...................................................
3387 SAN 4469. Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes--Non-Power Producers 2050-AE83
and Minefilling.......................................................................
3388 SAN 4411. Regulation of Hazardous Oil-bearing Secondary Materials from Petroleum 2050-AE78
Refining Industry and other Hazardous Secondary Materials Processed in a Gasification
System to Produce Synthesis Gas-Final Rule............................................
3389 SAN 4735. RCRA Burden Reduction Initiative, Phase 2................................... 2050-AF01
3390 SAN 4701. E-Cycling Pilot Project for Region 3 States (ECOS); Streamlining RCRA 2003-AA00
Regulations to Encourage Reuse, Recycling, and Recovery of Electronic Equipment.......
3391 SAN 3189. Final Determination of the Applicability of the Toxicity Characteristic Rule 2050-AD69
to Petroleum Contaminated Media and Debris from Underground Storage Tanks.............
3392 SAN 4091. Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Industrial 2050-AE51
Wipes.................................................................................
3393 SAN 4651. Increase Metals Reclamation from F006 Waste Streams......................... 2050-AE97
3394 SAN 4670. Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste.................................. 2050-AE98
3395 SAN 4778. Revisions of the Lead-Acid Battery Export Notification and Consent 2050-AF06
Requirements..........................................................................
3396 SAN 4834. Regulatory Amendments to the F019 Hazardous Waste Listing To Exclude the 2050-AG15
Wastewater Treatment Sludges From the Chemical Conversion Coating Process (Zinc
Phosphating) of Automobile Bodies of Aluminum.........................................
3397 SAN 4920. Streamlining Laboratory Waste Management in Academic and Research 2050-AG18
Laboratories..........................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3398 SAN 4588. Research, Development, and Demonstration Permits for Municipal Solid Waste 2050-AE92
Landfill..............................................................................
3399 SAN 4534. Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for Anne Arundel County Millersville 2090-AA25
Landfill, Severn, Maryland............................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OIL POLLUTION ACT (OPA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3400 SAN 2634. Revisions to the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) Rule. 2050-AG16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3401 SAN 3439. National Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites: Proposed 2050-AD75
and Final Rules.......................................................................
3402 SAN 4739. Standards and Practices for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries............ 2050-AF04
3403 SAN 4177. Revise 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart O: Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State 2050-AE62
Contracts for Superfund Response Actions..............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 38171]]
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3404 SAN 3423. Reportable Quantity Adjustments for Carbamates and Carbamate-Related 2050-AE12
Hazardous Waste Streams; Reportable Quantity Adjustment for Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing Process Waste (K178)....................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3405 SAN 4201. Criteria for the Designation of Hazardous Substances Under CERCLA Section 2050-AE63
102(a)................................................................................
3406 SAN 4736. Administrative Reporting Exemption for Certain Air Releases of NOx.......... 2050-AF02
3407 SAN 4737. Correction of Errors and Adjustment of CERCLA Reportable Quantities......... 2050-AF03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3408 SAN 4344. Water Quality Standards for Indian Country Waters........................... 2040-AD46
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3409 SAN 4526. Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency 2050-AE87
Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule Listing Requirements.................................
3410 SAN 4357. Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces--Phase 2040-AD39
II....................................................................................
3411 SAN 4543. Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact from Cooling Water Intake Structures 2040-AD70
at Existing Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, Phase 3...........
3412 SAN 3999. NPDES Permit Requirements for Municipal Sanitary and Combined Sewer 2040-AD02
Collection Systems, Municipal Satellite Collection Systems, Sanitary Sewer Overflows,
and Peak Excess Flow Treatment Facilities.............................................
3413 SAN 4690. Policy Regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit 2040-AD87
Requirements for Municipal Wastewater Treatment During Wet Weather Conditions.........
3414 SAN 4852. Water Quality Standards for Pathogens and Pathogen Indicators for Coastal 2040-AE63
Recreation Waters.....................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3415 SAN 4280. Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development 2040-AD42
Industry..............................................................................
3416 SAN 4406. Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Concentrated Aquatic Animal 2040-AD55
Production Industry...................................................................
3417 SAN 4407. Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point 2040-AD56
Source Category (Revisions)...........................................................
3418 SAN 4766. Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/2005.............................. 2040-AD92
3419 SAN 4378. Test Procedures: Revisions to Method Detection and Quantitation for the 2040-AD53
Clean Water Act.......................................................................
3420 SAN 4540. Test Procedures: New and Updated Test Procedures for the Analysis of 2040-AD71
Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act......................
3421 SAN 4474. Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact From Cooling Water Intake Structures 2040-AD62
at Existing Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, Phase 2...........
3422 SAN 3663. Streamlining the General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New 2040-AC58
Sources of Pollution..................................................................
3423 SAN 3288. Comparison of Dredged Material to Reference Sediment........................ 2040-AC14
3424 SAN 4822. Effluent Guidelines and Standards: Recodification of Various Effluent 2040-AE61
Guidelines............................................................................
3425 SAN 3925. Uniform National Discharge Standards for Armed Forces Vessels--Phase II..... 2040-AE64
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 38172]]
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3426 SAN 4370. Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point 2040-AD49
Source Category, Dissolving Kraft and Dissolving Sulfite Subcategories (Phase III)....
3427 SAN 3702. Test Procedures for the Analysis of Trace Metals Under the Clean Water Act.. 2040-AC75
3428 SAN 3714. Test Procedures: Increased Method Flexibility for Test Procedures Approved 2040-AC92
for Clean Water Act Compliance Monitoring.............................................
3429 SAN 3713. Test Procedures: Performance-Based Measurement System (PBMS) Procedures and 2040-AC93
Guidance for Clean Water Act Test Procedures..........................................
3430 SAN 4049. Test Procedures for the Analysis of Co-Planar and Mono-Ortho-Substituted 2040-AD09
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Under the Clean Water Act............................
3431 SAN 3786. NPDES Streamlining Rule -- Round III........................................ 2040-AC84
3432 SAN 4623. Watershed Rule: Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Revisions........... 2040-AD82
3433 SAN 4493. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Regulation Revisions Re: Use as Matching 2040-AD68
Funds.................................................................................
3434 SAN 4746. Regulations for Gray and Black Water Discharges From Cruise Ships Operating 2040-AD89
in Certain Alaskan Waters.............................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3435 SAN 4776. Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment Point 2040-AD95
Source Category (Revision)............................................................
3436 SAN 4264. Water Quality Standards for Alabama--Phase II............................... 2040-AD35
3437 SAN 3488. Round 2 Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge.................. 2040-AC25
3438 SAN 4624. Modification to Competitive Process Used by EPA for Wetland Program 2040-AD83
Development Grants....................................................................
3439 SAN 4792. Sewage Sludge Round I (Completion of a Section 610 Review).................. 2040-AD96
3440 SAN 4803. Sludge: Agency Response to the National Research Council Report on Biosolids 2040-AE59
Applied to Land and the Results of EPA's Review of Existing Sewage Sludge Regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3441 SAN 3238. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Aldicarb....................... 2040-AC13
3442 SAN 4770. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation for Public Water Systems 2040-AD93
Revisions.............................................................................
3443 SAN 4826. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Analytical Method for Uranium.. 2040-AE62
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3444 SAN 2340. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Groundwater Rule............... 2040-AA97
3445 SAN 4795. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Minor Corrections and 2040-AE58
Clarification to Drinking Water Regulations...........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3446 SAN 2281. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radon.......................... 2040-AA94
3447 SAN 4341. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface 2040-AD37
Water Treatment Rule..................................................................
3448 SAN 4342. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts 2040-AD38
Rule..................................................................................
[[Page 38173]]
3449 SAN 4404. National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR): Methyl Tertiary Butyl 2040-AD54
Ether (MTBE) and Technical Corrections to the NSDWR...................................
3450 SAN 4775. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Revisions to the Total Coliform 2040-AD94
Monitoring and Analytical Requirements and Additional Distribution System Requirements
3451 SAN 4745. Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 3................................. 2040-AD99
3452 SAN 4236. Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs..................... 2040-AD40
3453 SAN 4821. Drinking Water: Regulatory Determinations Regarding Contaminants on the 2040-AE60
Second Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List......................................
3454 SAN 4703. Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 2................................. 2060-AD86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3455 SAN 4769. National Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations: Approval of 2040-AD90
Additional Method for the Detection of Coliforms and E. Coli. in Drinking Water.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHORE PROTECTION ACT (SPA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3456 SAN 2820. Shore Protection Act, Section 4103(b) Regulations........................... 2040-AB85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3040. INCORPORATION OF CLASS DEVIATIONS INTO EPAAR
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 40 USC 486(c)
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1537; 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency has approved a number of class deviations (e.g.,
changes to reporting requirements and monthly progress reports) to the
EPAAR since its promulgation in April 1994. This proposed rule would
incorporate most of the class deviations to the EPAAR.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3580.
Agency Contact: Frances Smith, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4368
Fax: 202 565-2475
Email: smith.frances@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA37
_______________________________________________________________________
3041. PROPOSED REVISION TO EPA'S IMPLEMENTING NEPA REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 4321
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 6
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed revision is necessary to clarify and update
EPA's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulation. The revision
would clarify Agency responsibilities for: Congressionally funded
special appropriation projects and EPA-funded grant programs. The
revision would clarify public involvement procedures and organization
responsibilities. The proposal would revise the list of actions which
are categorically excluded from analyses. The revision is also needed
to incorporate a number ofExecutive orders and other cross-cutting
requirements into the NEPA process.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/05
Final Action 02/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4292.
[[Page 38174]]
Agency Contact: Katherine Biggs, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2252A, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-7144
Fax: 202 564-0070
Email: biggs.katherine@epamail.epa.gov
Joseph Montgomery, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2252A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7157
Fax: 202-564-0072
Email: montgomery.joseph@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2020-AA42
_______________________________________________________________________
3042. PRIVACY ACT REGULATIONS (REVISED)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 5 USC 552a
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 16 (Revised)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action proposed to revise the Privacy Act regulation to
exempt new systems and systems currently claiming to be exempt from the
Act. Other revisions are generally minor and include revising the
access provision so that a copy of a record can be obtained without a
personal inspection; changing the time limit for appeals of denials
from 10 days to 30 days; changing the process for accessing Privacy Act
records and contesting Privacy Act records from the system manager to
the Freedom of Information Office; and referring appeals from denials
of system of records maintained by the Office of Inspector General to
that office for decision. The proposed rule does not have implications
on small businesses nor state/local/tribal government.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4693.
Agency Contact: Judy Hutt, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2822T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1668
Fax: 202 566-1639
Email: hutt.judy@epamail.epa.gov
Deborah Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2822T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1659
Fax: 202 566-1648
Email: williams.deborah@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA13
_______________________________________________________________________
3043. REVISION TO EPAAR 1552.211-73, LEVEL OF EFFORT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301 ``Sec 205(c)''; ``63 Stat 390 as amended''
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will revise EPAAR 1552.211-73, Level of Effort, to
define more concisely the services being acquired, and to more
accurately reflect the relationship between services provided and fee
payments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4191.
Agency Contact: Larry Wyborski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4369
Fax: 202 565-2551
Email: wyborski.larry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA64
_______________________________________________________________________
3044. REVISIONS TO ACQUISITION REGULATION CONCERNING CONFLICT OF
INTEREST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of this rule is to revise the Agency's conflict
of interest (COI) acquisition regulations. The specific revisions
involve more stringent requirements for submission of relevant
information from Agency contractors and potential contractors regarding
their relationships with parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries,
and sister companies. Current Agency regulations do not require the
submission of this level of information. Receipt and evaluation of this
information is critical in order for the Agency to decide whether or
not COI situations exist and how they are to be handled. This revised
rule will also codify several COI clauses that have been developed
since the issuance of the previous rule in 1994.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4319.
Sectors Affected: 5413 Architectural, Engineering and Related Services;
54162 Environmental Consulting Services; 5416 Management, Scientific
and Technical Consulting Services; 5417 Scientific Research and
Development Services; 562 Waste Management and Remediation Services
Agency Contact: Daniel Humphries, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4377
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: humphries.daniel@epamail.epa.gov
Cal McWhirter, Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and
Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4379
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: mcwhirter.cal@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA67
_______________________________________________________________________
3045. CONTINUATION OF IMPLEMENTING THE EMPOWERMENT INITIATIVE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
[[Page 38175]]
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA's Office of Acquisition Management conducted an internal
assessment of its organization and determined that in some situations
there were too many levels of review required prior to making contract
awards and other contract-related decisions. Consequently, steps were
taken to revise internal policies to eliminate certain higher level
reviews and give authority and responsibility for making decisions
relating to contract actions to the qualified individuals most familiar
with the contracting action. This rule is being issued as a direct
final rule because the changes being made are not considered
controversial and adverse comments are not expected.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4742.
Agency Contact: Jill Robbins, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1981
Fax: 202 565-2475
Email: robbins.jill@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA81
_______________________________________________________________________
3046. ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE BACKGROUND CHECKS PERFORMED BY EPA AND
CONTRACTORS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301; Sec 205(c), 63 Stat 390, as amended; 40 USC
486 (c); 41 USC 418 (b)
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1511; 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register, Jan.
22, 2003, and required contractors to perform background checks and
make suitability determinations before contractors can perform services
on site. On Feb. 10, 2003, EPA transmitted an information collection
request (ICR) to OMB. On May 13, 2003, OMB disapproved the ICR and the
proposed rule, citing concerns regarding contractors performing
suitability determinations which OMB considers to be an inherently
governmental function. Since that time, EPA staff have been in
discussions with OMB, and we are currently developing different options
to address the issue of background checks for contractors. The current
proposed rule is expected to be replaced with a revised proposed rule
in FY 2004.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4814.
Agency Contact: Judy Davis, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4310
Email: davis.judy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA85
_______________________________________________________________________
3047. CONTRACT BUNDLING REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301; 41 USC 418 (b); Sec 205(c), 63 Stat 390, as
amended
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1519; 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In March of 2003, the President called on the Office of
Management and Budget to prepare a strategy for unbundling federal
contracts. Federal contracting opportunities for Small Businesses have
been dramatically reduced because of contract bundling. Contract
bundling occurs when two or more procurement requirements for goods or
services previously provided or performed under separate, smaller
contracts is consolidated into a solicitation of offers for a single
contract that is unlikely to be suitable for award to a small business
concern. OMB's plan will require all agencies to uniformly review
requirements prior to contract bundling. In addition, the plan will
require contract bundling reviews for task and delivery orders under
multiple award contract vehicles. Senior agency management will be held
accountable for eliminating unnecessary contract bundling and
mitigating the effects of necessary and justified contract bundling. In
acquisitions where contract bundling is determined tobe necessary and
justified, actions will be taken to mitigate the effects by increasing
subcontracting opportunities for small business. EPA's Office of Small
and Disadvantage Business Utilization and OAM will be working closely
to eliminate unnecessary contract bundling and mitigating the effects
of necessary contract bundling. Additional agency guidance and training
will be forthcoming.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4812.
Agency Contact: Patrick Murphy, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4382
Email: murphy.patrick@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA86
_______________________________________________________________________
3048. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES
CONTROL ACT CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION ACCESS FOR CONTRACTORS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301 sec 205 (c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended; 40
USC 486 (c); 41 USC 418b
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1552; 48 CFR 1535
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Current security requirements for Toxic Substances Contract
Act Confidential Business Information (TSCA CBI) access for contractors
are implemented in three Environmental Protection Agency contract
clauses, 1552.235-75, 1552.235-76, and
[[Page 38176]]
1552.235-78. Security requirements for the Government and contractors
have been updated in a 2003 TSCA CBI Protection Manual. This rulemaking
will implement the new TSCA CBI requirements into the three EPAAR
clauses cited above.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4904.
Agency Contact: Linda Clement, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4356
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: clement.linda@epamail.epa.gov
Harry Lewis, Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and
Resources Management, 7407, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8642
Email: lewis.harry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA88
_______________________________________________________________________
3049. AWARD TERM CONTRACTING
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 41 USC 418(b; 5 USC 301, sec 205(c); 63 Stat 390, as
amended
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1516 and 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
amend the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to add guidance on the use
of award-term contracts. The guidance is necessary for contracting
officers seeking to include award-term provisions in contracts. This
guidance will establish a solicitation provision and contract clause in
the EPAAR.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 02/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4903.
Agency Contact: Ed Chambers, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4376
Email: chambers.ed@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA89
_______________________________________________________________________
3050. WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT (WIPP) FY 2002 REPORT TO CONGRESS
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: PL 102-579 sec 23(a)(2)
CFR Citation: 00 CFR NYD
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This Report to Congress is required by Section 23(a)(2) of
the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, which requires EPA to submit an annual
report to Congress ``on the status of and resources required for the
fulfillment of the Administrator's responsibilities under the Act''
regarding the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This report
summarizes the activities and progress EPA has made in fulfilling its
responsibilities under the Act and outlines the resources required for
the Agency to meet its commitments. The WIPP is an underground
repository for the permanent disposal of radioactive waste generated as
by-products from nuclear weapons production. It was constructed by the
Department of Energy (DOE) and is located near Carlsbad, New Mexico. In
1998, EPA certified that the WIPP complies with EPA's radioactive waste
disposal standards at subpart B and C of 40 CFR 191 and EPA's WIPP
compliance criteria at 40 CFR 194, and thus is safe to contain
radioactive waste. Since that time, the DOE has begun emplacing waste
in the WIPP. The waste is stored approximately 2,100 feet underground
in excavated, natural salt formations. EPA also has responsibility for
assuring continual compliance with EPA's radioactive waste disposal
standards. EPA continues to have an oversight role at the WIPP to
ensure that it continues to protect human health and the environment.
This Report summarizes EPA's activities past and present.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Report to Congress 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4761.
Agency Contact: Ray Lee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4625
Fax: 202 343-2305
Email: lee.ray@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK79
_______________________________________________________________________
3051. PERSISTENT, BIOACCUMULATIVE, AND TOXIC (PBT) POLLUTANTS STRATEGY
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As described in the Agency's 1998 PBT Strategy, EPA is
developing and implementing National Action Plans for certain priority
PBT pollutants. These pollutants pose risks because they are toxic,
persist in ecosystems, and accumulate in fish and up the food chain.
The PBT challenges remaining stem from the pollutants' ability to
travel long distances, to transfer rather easily among air, water, and
land, and to linger for generations. EPA is forging a new approach to
reduce risks from and exposures to priority PBT pollutants through
increased coordination among EPA national and regional programs. This
approach also requires the significant involvement of stakeholders,
including international, state, local, and tribal organizations, the
regulated community, environmental groups, and private citizens. EPA is
initially focusing action on 12 substances either individually or as
categories and two major cross-cutting issues (monitoring and outreach/
risk communication). The action plans will use the full range of tools
to prevent and reduce releases of these substances. These tools include
international, voluntary, outreach, programmatic, remedial, compliance
monitoring and assistance, enforcement, research, and regulatory tools.
EPA will integrate and sequence actions within and across action plans,
and will seek to leverage these actions on international and industry-
sector bases. Beyond these first 12 substances EPA will identify
additional PBTs for
[[Page 38177]]
development of National Action Plans. Although these Plans are not
regulatory actions, EPA has included them in the Regulatory Agenda to
inform the public and regulated community because the Action Plans may
discuss regulatory alternatives for consideration.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice: Draft for Mercury 11/17/98 63 FR 63926
Notice: PBT Strategy 11/17/98 63 FR 63926
Notice: Draft for Great Lakes 11/01/99 64 FR 58841
Notice: Draft for Alkyl-lead 08/25/00 65 FR 51823
Notice: Draft for OCS 08/25/00 65 FR 51825
Notice: Draft for Alkyl-lead
Reopened 10/25/00 65 FR 63861
Notice: Draft for Level 1
Pesticides 11/01/00 65 FR 65314
Notice: Draft for HCB 12/08/00 65 FR 77026
Notice: Final for Alkyl-lead 07/23/02 67 FR 48177
Notice: Draft for B(a)P 12/00/04
Notice: Final for HCB 12/00/04
Notice: Final for OCS 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4463.
Agency Contact: Tom--HQ Murray, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7409M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8810
Fax: 202 564-8901
Email: murray.tom-hq@epamail.epa.gov
Paul Matthai, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7409M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8839
Fax: 202 564-8899
Email: matthai.paul@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD45
_______________________________________________________________________
3052. PROJECT XL SITE SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR THE NASA WHITE SANDS TEST
FACILITY IN LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO (PHASES III-VI)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 33 USC 2701 to 2761; 42 USC 300(f) to 300(j)-26; 42
USC 6901 to 6992(k)
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered
into a Final Project Agreement with the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) White Sands Test Facility in Las Cruces, Mexico
that would modify the reporting requirements under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA). The rule will allow the facility to submit regulatory reports
and permit information electronically rather than on paper to the New
Mexico Environment Department (NMED) Solid Waste Bureau, Hazardous
Waste Bureau, Groundwater Bureau, and Air Quality Bureau. Doing so will
significantly reduce its regulatory reporting costs and enhance the
State's ability to analyze and manage the facility's regulatory and
permit information. The electronic reporting involves six phases that
will transition NASA from submitting data on a CD-ROM to utilizing the
Internet to transmit data to NMED. This rule covers Phases III-VI of
the project, the previous NASA White Sands Test Facility Final Rule
covered Phases I-II.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4836.
Agency Contact: Adam Levitan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-1466
Fax: 202 566-2210
Email: levitan.adam@epamail.epa.gov
Donna Perla, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1802, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2177
Fax: 202 566-2200
Email: perla.donna@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA35
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3053. IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTHORITY TO APPOINT RESEARCH SCIENTISTS UNDER
42 USC
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed regulation will implement the Agency's authority
under 42 USC 6A.I.61 section 209(f) and 209(g) to appoint research
scientists and to take related personnel actions. Under 42 USC, the
Agency has authority to make appointments of research scientists and to
take related personnel actions including determining qualifications,
method of recruitment, selection, duration of appointment and pay. The
Agency's authority under 42 USC is separate from and not limited by 5
USC. The authority granted to the Agency under 42 USC derives from one
of the foundation documents of the Agency: Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1970.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4747.
Agency Contact: John O'Brien, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3620M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7876
Fax: 202 564-2904
Email: obrien.johnt@epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA83
[[Page 38178]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3054. CROSS-MEDIA ELECTRONIC REPORTING (ER) AND RECORDKEEPING RULE
(CROMERRR)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: PL 104-13; PL 105-277
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 3 (New); 40 CFR 9 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As proposed, the Cross-Media Electronic Reporting (ER) and
Recordkeeping Rule (CROMERRR) was intended to provide a uniform legal
framework for paperless electronic reporting and recordkeeping,
including electronic signature/certification, across EPA's
environmental compliance programs. Based on public comment, however,
EPA now plans to focus on finalizing the electronic reporting
components of the proposed CROMERRR, and to defer further action on the
electronic recordkeeping components until a later time. Under current
plans, the final electronic reporting (ER) rule will address electronic
reporting by companies regulated under all of EPA's programs: air,
water, pesticides, toxic substances, wastes, and emergency response.
The final rule will remove existing regulatory obstacles to electronic
reporting, and it would set requirements for companies choosing to
report electronically. In addition, the rule would set the conditions
for allowing electronic reporting under State, tribal or local
environmental programs that operate under EPA authorization. The final
ER rule is intended to make electronic reporting as simple, efficient,
and cost-effective as possible for regulated companies, while ensuring
that a transition from paper to electronic reporting does not
compromise EPA's compliance and enforcement programs. Consequently, the
Agency's strategy is to impose as few specific requirements as
possible, and to keep those requirements neutral with respect to
technology, so the rule will pose no obstacles to adopting new
technologies as they emerge. To ensure that authorized programs at the
State, tribal, and local levels meet EPA's electronic reporting goals,
the final ER rule would specify a set of criteria that these program's
must satisfy as they initiate electronic reporting. In response to
public comments, EPA is also planning to include provisions for a
streamlined process for EPA to review and approve authorized program
revisions or modifications to allow electronic reporting. EPA is
required by the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) of 1998 to
make the option of electronic reporting and recordkeeping available,
where practicable, to its regulated community by October 2003.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/31/01 66 FR 46162
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4270. Formerly listed as RIN 2020-AA41.
Agency Contact: Evi Huffer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2136 (WSM Room 445D WT), Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-566-1697
Fax: 202 260-9322
Email: huffer.evi@epamail.epa.gov
David Schwarz, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental
Information, 2823T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1704
Fax: 202 566-1684
Email: schwarz.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA07
_______________________________________________________________________
3055. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR CONTRACTORS PERFORMING SERVICES
ONSITE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, September 6, 2002.
Final, Statutory, December 5, 2002.
Abstract: Executive Orders 10450 and 12968 require that all persons
entering Federal service, including contract employees, be investigated
for suitability. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
to amend the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to add a clause
requiring contractors (and subcontractors) to perform background checks
and make suitability determinations for contractor (and subcontractor)
employees performing services on or within Federally-owned or leased
space and facilities, commercial space primarily occupied by Federal
employees, and Superfund, Oil Pollution Act, and Stafford Act sites.
The clause will require contractors (and subcontractors) to perform
background checks and make suitability determinations on their
employees before the employees can perform on-site contract services
for the EPA. Contracting Officers will be allowed to waive the
requirements of the clause on a case-by-case basis. The process
contemplated by the clause will allow EPA to mitigate any actual or
potential threat to the public health, welfare and the environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/22/03 68 FR 2988
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4733.
Agency Contact: Paul Schaffer, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4366
Fax: 202 565-2475
Email: schaffer.paul@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA80
_______________________________________________________________________
3056. MISCELLANEOUS REVISIONS TO EPAAR CLAUSES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301; Sec (c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended; 40 USC
486 (c); 41 USC 418(b)
CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1515; 48 CFR 1535; 48 CFR 1552
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule includes administrative changes to various EPAAR
clauses, such as address changes and points of contact. Nothing
substantive will be affected.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 06/00/04
NPRM 07/00/04
[[Page 38179]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4813.
Agency Contact: Dan Humphries, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4377
Email: humphries.daniel@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2030-AA84
_______________________________________________________________________
3057. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL POLICY FOR
THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule implements three technical amendments to the Common
Rule which governs the conduct of human studies in several agencies.
The agencies listed in this document are individually amending the
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, which was
published in the Federal Register on June 18, 1991, to change all
references to the Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR) to
the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP); revise the footnote
found at the end of section 101(i) by deleting references to research
involving fetuses, pregnant women, or human in vitro fertilization and
subpart B of 45 CFR part 46; and update the Control Number for the
approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of the
information collection requirements of this Federal Policy. HHS is the
lead Agency in developing the language for this rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4925.
Agency Contact: Dennis Utterback, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Research and Development, 8104R, Washington DC, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6638
Fax: 202 565-2911
Email: utterback.dennis@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2080-AA11
_______________________________________________________________________
3058. PROJECT XL SITE SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR NASA WHITE SANDS TEST
FACILITY ELECTRONIC REPORTING IN LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO (PHASES I AND II)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: ``Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 USC 300f to 300J-26;
Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 USC 6901 to 6992k''
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has entered
into an XL (eXcellence and Leadership) Final Project Agreement (FPA)
with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) White
Sands Test Facility (WSTF) in Las Cruces, NM to implement a project
that would modify reporting requirements under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA), Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Clean Air Act (CAA). The purpose
of this NASA WSTF Electronic Reporting site-specific rule is to enable
the NASA WSTF to electronically submit compliance reports and permit
information to the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) in lieu of
submitting paper reports. The rule will set forth guidelines to ensure
that the information submitted by NASA WSTF to NMED is accurate by
outlining procedures for data authentication, use of electronic
signature and encryption processes. This rule will address Phases I and
II of the project covering reporting requirementsunder RCRA and the
SDWA. A second and subsequent rule will address Phases III-VI of the
project covering additional reporting requirements under the CWA and CAA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/31/01 66 FR 55050
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4536.
Agency Contact: Kristina Heinemann, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of the Administrator, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2183
Fax: 202 566-2220
Email: heinemann.kristina@epamail.epa.gov
Gerald Filbin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2182
Fax: 202 566-2220
Email: filbin.gerald@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA27
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3059. UTILIZATION OF SMALL, MINORITY AND WOMEN'S BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN
PROCUREMENT UNDER ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: PL 101-507; PL 102-389; PL 101-549 ``sec 1001''; 42
USC 9605(f); PL 100-590; EO 12432; EO 12138; EO 11625
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 33
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The regulation will codify revisions to the Agency's program
for the utilization of Small, Minority and Women's Business Enterprises
in procurements under assistance agreements (i.e., grants and
cooperative agreements awarded by EPA as well as grants and cooperative
agreements awarded by other agencies under interagency agreements with
EPA). The revisions are necessary to ensure
[[Page 38180]]
consistency with the Supreme Court's decision in Adarand Constructors,
Inc. v. Pena, 115 S.Ct. 2097 (1995), and were identified as part of the
Clinton Administration's review of affirmative action programs. They
include: (1) placing greater emphasis on requiring assistance agreement
recipients to submit documentation supporting proposed fair share
procurement objectives for Minority Business Enterprises (MBEs) and
Women's Business Enterprises (WBEs) based on the availability of
qualified MBEs and WBEs in the relevant geographic market; (2)
authorizing or requiring recipients and their prime contractors to
takereasonable race/gender-conscious measures (e.g., bidding credits)
in the event that race/gender-neutral efforts prove inadequate to meet
fair share objectives; and (3) administering statutory MBE/WBE
objectives as a national goal, allowing smaller or larger fair share
objectives for particular grants or cooperative agreements based on the
availability standard.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/24/03 68 FR 43824
Final Action 05/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4056.
Agency Contact: Kimberly Patrick, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 1230, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-5386
Fax: 202 501-0139
Email: patrick.kimberly@.epa.gov
David Sutton, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance, 1230A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4444
Fax: 202 501-0756
Email: sutton.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2020-AA39
_______________________________________________________________________
3060. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2005; 15 USC 2601 et seq; 21 USC 346; 33 USC
1251 et seq; 33 USC 1414; 42 USC 11001 et seq; 42 USC 300(f) et seq; 42
USC 4912; 42 USC 6901 et seq; 42 USC 7401 et seq; 42 USC 9601 et seq; 5
USC 552; 7 USC 136 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 2; 40 CFR 57; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 145;
40 CFR 233; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 270; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 281; 40 CFR 350;
40 CFR 403; 40 CFR 85; 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, August 31, 2000, Proposed rule to
eliminate the special treatment of CBI substantiations.
Abstract: EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, provide
procedures for handling and disclosing information claimed as
confidential business information (CBI). Although the current
regulations have succeeded in protecting CBI, changes in Agency
workload, practice, and statutory authority have made it difficult to
handle CBI activities as expeditiously as desired. EPA is examining its
CBI regulations to determine whether changes are needed to make them
more efficient and effective. Provision 40 CFR 2.205(c), which
automatically protects CBI substantiations claimed as confidential, is
being examined individually and as part of the CBI regulations as a whole.
NOTE: EPA has examined its CBI regulations and decided to withdraw from
taking further actions on revising the CBI regulations--40 CFR part 2,
subpart B. However, consideration for eliminating special treatment of
substantiations is still pending court ruling.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 1 11/23/94 59 FR 60446
NPRM 2 10/25/99 64 FR 57421
NPRM 3 12/21/99 64 FR 71366
NPRM 4 08/30/00 65 FR 52684
ANPRM 12/21/00 65 FR 80394
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3240.
Agency Contact: Doreen Sterling, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2822-T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1642
Fax: 202 566-1639
Email: sterling.doreen@epamail.epa.gov
Joe Sierra, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental
Information, 2822T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1683
Fax: 202 566-1639
Email: sierra.joe@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA02
_______________________________________________________________________
3061. GUIDELINES FOR CARCINOGEN RISK ASSESSMENT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency will use these guidelines to evaluate suspect
carcinogens in line with the policies and procedures established in the
statutes administered by the EPA. These guidelines revise and replace
EPA Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment published at 51 FR 33992,
September 24, 1986. These guidelines provide EPA staff and
decisionmakers with the directions and perspectives necessary to
develop and use risk assessments. The guidelines also provide the
general public with basic information about the Agency's approaches to
risk assessment.
To develop guidelines the Agency must find a balance between
consistency and innovation. Consistent risk assessments provide
consistent bases to support regulatory decision-making. On the other
hand, innovation is necessary so the Agency will base its decisions on
current scientific thinking. In balancing these and other science
policies, the Agency relies on input from the general scientific
community through established scientific peer review processes. The
guidelines incorporate basic principles and science policies based on
evaluation of the currently available information. The revisions place
increased emphasis on the role of carcinogenic mechanisms in risk
assessment and clearer explication of underlying assumptions in risk
assessment.
These guidelines will have minimal to no impact on small businesses or
State, local, and tribal governments.
[[Page 38181]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Reproposed Guidelines 04/23/96 61 FR 17960
Implementation Policy 06/25/96 61 FR 32799
Final Guidelines To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3671.
Agency Contact: William Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Research and Development, 8103, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3358
Email: wood.bill@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2080-AA06
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
General
_______________________________________________________________________
3062. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON ENFORCEMENT DATA CONCERNING SMALL ENTITIES
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
CFR Citation: None
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Report to Congress 01/20/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Gerard Kraus
Phone: 202-564-6047
Fax: 202 564-0017
Email: kraus.gerard@epamail.epa.gov
Deborah Thomas
Phone: 202-564-5041
Fax: 202 564-0037
Email: thomas.deborah@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2020-AA45
_______________________________________________________________________
3063. REGULATORY INCENTIVES FOR THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
TRACK PROGRAM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 262
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/22/04 69 FR 21737
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Agency Contact: Robert Sachs
Phone: 202-566-2884
Fax: 202-566-0966
Email: sachs.robert@.epa.gov
David Guest
Phone: 202-566-2872
Fax: 202 566-2985
Email: guest.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA13
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3064. REVISIONS TO CLARIFY THE SCOPE OF CERTAIN MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
FOR FEDERAL AND STATE OPERATING PERMITS PROGRAMS
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70.6(c)(1); 40 CFR 71.6(c)(1)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The final rule for this action was published on January 22,
2004 (69 FR 3202). The purpose of the final rule was to clarify the
regulatory language and EPA interpretation of the ``umbrella
monitoring'' rules [(40 CFR 70.6(c)(1) and 71.6(c)(1)]
of the State and
federal operating permits program rules under title V of the Clean Air
Act (Act). The final rule declines to adopt the changes to the
regulatory text of the monitoring rules that were proposed on September
17, 2002 (67 FR 58561) and it announces a different interpretation of
the umbrella monitoring rules from that set forth in the preamble to
that proposal. Under the final rule, the umbrella monitoring rules do
not provide a basis for adding monitoring to title V permits
independent of monitoring required under existing federal air pollution
control rules and State implementation plan (SIP) rules (i.e.,
monitoring required under ``applicable requirements''), including
monitoring required under the compliance assurance monitoring(CAM) rule
where it applies, and such monitoring as may be required under the
periodic monitoring rules [40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(i)(B) and
71.6(a)(3)(i)(B)]. Accordingly, EPA interprets the umbrella monitoring
rules to require that title V permits contain monitoring required under
applicable requirements, including monitoring required under the CAM
rule where it applies, and such monitoring as may be required under the
periodic monitoring rules. Together, such monitoring will constitute
monitoringsufficient to assure compliance as required by the Act. In
the final rule, EPA also announded plans for three additional steps.
One step will involve encouraging States to improve monitoring
requirements in certain SIP rules through guidance to be developed in
connection with a separate rulemaking concerning the implementation of
the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate
matter to be published in the near term. Another step involves
publication of an advance ce of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) in the near
term to ask for comments on inadequate monitoring in applicable
requirements (in addition to any monitoring addressed in the fine
particulate guidance and rulemaking) and on appropriate methods for
upgrading such monitoring. Finally, EPA expects to conduct a separate
notice and comment rulemaking to address what types of existing
monitoring are ``periodic'' under the periodic monitoring rules, and when
[[Page 38182]]
the periodic monitoring rules apply, what types of monitoring satisfy
the monitoring criteria contained in the periodic monitoring rules.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/17/02 67 FR 58561
Interim Final Action 09/17/02 67 FR 58529
Final Action 01/22/04 69 FR 3202
ANPRM 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4699.
Agency Contact: Jeff Herring, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C304-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3195
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: herring.jeff@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Hitte, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C304-
04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0886
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hitte.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK29
_______________________________________________________________________
3065. REVISION TO POLICY ON CONTROL OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering the proposal of revisions to its policy on
control of volatile organic compounds (VOC), including the use of
photochemical reactivity in controlling VOCs. As a first step, an ANPRM
will be issued soliciting public comment on various policy options.
Subsequent steps could range from taking no further action to
publishing a policy statement in the Federal Register. The ANPRM is to
announce that EPA is considering revision of its VOC policy which
appeared in the July 8, 1977 ederal Register (42 FR 35314) under the
title ``Recommended Policy on Control of Volatile Organic Compounds.''
That policy statement gave a broad description about how EPA would
approach VOC control. This policy also said that we would be exempting
certain organic compounds from control in volatile organic compound
regulations (to meet ozone ambient air quality limits) due to these
compounds having very low ozone forming potential. A list of exempt
compounds was later codified in the definition of VOC at 40 CFR
51.100(s) which was adopted on February 3, 1992 (57 FR 3941) for use in
State Implementation Plans. The ANPRM will ask for public comments on
various approaches EPA may use in the future to take photochemical
reactivity into account in controlling VOCs. The ANPRM could lead to a
policy statement, such as the 1977 policy statement, which would give a
broad outline of the new approach EPA would take in the future. This
would not be a rulemaking, but the revised policy could lead to new
rules being adopted still further in the future. (Any such rules would
be separately noticed in the Regulatory Agenda.) For example, the ANPRM
could eventually lead to a revision of the definition of VOC at 40 CFR
51.100(s).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4759.
Agency Contact: William L. Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5245
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: johnson.williaml@epamail.epa.gov
Terry Keating, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6103A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-1174
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: keating.terry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK75
_______________________________________________________________________
3066. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NEW LOCOMOTIVES AND
NEW MARINE DIESEL ENGINES LESS THAN 30 LITERS PER CYLINDER
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7522 to 7621
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 92 and 94
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will set an additional tier of more stringent
exhaust emission standards for new locomotives and new marine
compression-ignition engines below 30 liters per cylinder. These new
standards are expected to reflect the emission reductions achievable
through the application of advanced emission control technologies,
including high-efficiency catalytic exhaust emission control devices,
and the availability and use of low sulfur diesel fuel. The standards
build on our existing locomotive andmarine diesel engine emission
control programs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 06/00/04
NPRM 07/00/05
Final Action 05/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4871.
Agency Contact: Jean--Marie Revelt, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, 6401A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4822
Email: revelt.jean-marie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM06
_______________________________________________________________________
3067. FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES REGISTRATION
REGULATIONS (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 211
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 79
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On June 27, 1994 (59 FR 33042), EPA promulgated a rulemaking
laying out the requirements for
[[Page 38183]]
registering fuel and fuel additives under section 211 of the Clean Air
Act. These requirements are codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
at 40 CFR part 79. In developing this rule, EPA performed a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis which indicated the rule could have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA then used this
analysis to develop the rule in a way that mitigatedsmall-entity impact
to the extent possible while still fulfilling the Clean Air Act's mandates.
EPA is now initiating a review of this rule under Section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to determine if the rule should be continued
without change, or should be amended or rescinded, to minimize adverse
economic impacts on small entities. EPA will consider, and solicits
comments on, the following factors: (1) The continued need for the
rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received concerning the
rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule
overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local
government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic
conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the
rule. Comments must be received by July 31, 2004. In submitting
comments, please reference Docket ID number OAR-2004-0053, and follow
the instructions provided in Unit G of the preamble to the Spring
Regulatory Agenda.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Begin Review 06/00/04
End Review 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4922.
Agency Contact: Thomas Eagles, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6103A, Washington DC, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1952
Fax: 202 564-1554
Email: eagles.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM38
_______________________________________________________________________
3068. EMISSION STANDARDS FOR NEW NONROAD SPARK-
IGNITION ENGINES AT OR BELOW 19 KILOWATTS (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Section 202 et seq; Regulatory
Flexibility Act
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 90
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On July 3, 1995 (60 FR 34582), EPA promulgated a rulemaking
laying out new emission standards for new nonroad spark-ignition
engines at or below 19 kilowatts under sections 202, 203, 204, 205,
206, 207, 208, 209, 213, 215, 216, and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act.
These requirements are codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at
40 CFR Part 90. In developing this rule, EPA performed a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis which indicated the rule could have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA then used this
analysis to develop the rule in a way that mitigated small-entity
impact to the extent possible while still fulfilling the Clean Air
Act's mandates.
EPA is now initiating a review of this rule under Section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to determine if the rule should be continued
without change, or should be amended or rescinded, to minimize adverse
economic impacts on small entities. EPA will consider, and solicits
comments on, the following factors: (1) the continued need for the
rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received concerning the
rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule
overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local
government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic
conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the
rule. Comments must be received by July 31, 2004. In submitting
comments, please reference Docket ID number OAR-2004-0054, and follow
the instructions provided in Unit G of the preamble to the Spring
Regulatory Agenda.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Begin Review 06/00/04
End Review 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4921.
Agency Contact: Thomas Eagles, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6103A, Washington DC, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1952
Fax: 202 564-1554
Email: eagles.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM39
_______________________________________________________________________
3069. NESHAP: SECONDARY LEAD SMELTING (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Regulatory Flexibility Act
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart X
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On June 23, 1995 (60 FR 32587), EPA promulgated a rulemaking
laying out new National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for the secondary lead smelting industry under Section 112 of
the Clean Air Act. These requirements are codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart X. In developing this
rule, EPA performed a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis which indicated
the rule could have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. EPA then used this analysis to develop the rule in a
way that mitigated small-entity impact to the extent possible while
still fulfilling the Clean Air Act's mandates.
EPA is now initiating a review of this rule under Section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to determine if the rule should be continued
without change, or should be amended or rescinded, to minimize adverse
economic impacts on small entities. EPA will consider, and solicits
comments on, the following factors: (1) The continued need for the
rule; (2) The nature of complaints or comments received concerning the
rule; (3) The complexity of the rule; (4) The extent to which the rule
overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local
government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic
conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the
rule. Comments must be received by July 31, 2004. In submitting
comments, please reference Docket ID number OAR-2004-0056, and follow the
[[Page 38184]]
instructions provided in Unit G of the preamble to the Spring
Regulatory Agenda.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Begin Review 06/00/04
End Review 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4924.
Agency Contact: Thomas Eagles, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6103A, Washington DC, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1952
Fax: 202 564-1554
Email: eagles.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM40
_______________________________________________________________________
3070. NESHAP: PETROLEUM REFINERIES (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112; Regulatory Flexibility Act
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart CC
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On August 18, 1995 (60 FR 43244), EPA promulgated a
rulemaking laying out new National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for the petroleum refining industry under section
112 of the Clean Air Act. These requirements are codified in the Code
of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR part 63 subpart CC. In developing this
rule, EPA performed a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis which indicated
the rule could have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. EPA then used this analysis to develop the rule in a
way that mitigated small-entity impact to the extent possible while
still fulfilling the Clean Air Act's mandates.
EPA is now initiating a review of this rule under Section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to determine if the rule should be continued
without change, or should be amended or rescinded, to minimize adverse
economic impacts on small entities. EPA will consider, and solicits
comments on, the following factors: (1) The continued need for the
rule; (2) The nature of complaints or comments received concerning the
rule; (3) The complexity of the rule; (4) The extent to which the rule
overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local
government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic
conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the
rule. Comments must be received by July 31, 2004. In submitting
comments, please reference Docket ID number OAR-2004-0055, and follow
the instructions provided in Unit G of the preamble to the Spring
Regulatory Agenda.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Begin Review 06/00/04
End Review 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4923.
Agency Contact: Thomas Eagles, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6103A, Washington DC, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1952
Fax: 202 564-1554
Email: eagles.tom@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM41
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3071. REVIEW NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CARBON MONOXIDE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 31, 2001, Clean Air Act requires
reviews every five years.
Abstract: Review of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
for carbon monoxide (CO) every 5 years is mandated by the Clean Air
Act. This review assesses the available scientific data about the
health and environmental effects of CO and translates the science into
terms that can be used in making recommendations about whether or how
the standards should be changed. The last review of the CO NAAQS was
completed in 1994 with a final decision that revisions were not
appropriate at that time.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/05
Final Action 05/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4266.
Agency Contact: Dave Mckee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5288
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: mckee.dave@epamail.epa.gov
Harvey Richmond, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5271
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: richmond.harvey@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI43
_______________________________________________________________________
3072. REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
PARTICULATE MATTER
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, March 31, 2005, -.
Final, Judicial, December 20, 2005, -.
Abstract: On July 18, 1997, the EPA published a final rule revising the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter
(PM) (62 FR 38652). While retaining the PM10 standard levels, new
standards were added for fine particles (PM2.5)
[[Page 38185]]
to provide increased protection against both health and environmental
effects of PM. On the same day, a Presidential Memorandum (62 FR 38421)
was published that, among other things, anticipated that EPA would
complete the next review of the PM NAAQS by July 2002. The EPA's plans
and schedule for the next periodic review of the PM NAAQS were
published on October 23, 1997 (62 FR 55201). Due to the unprecedented
volume of new research, the completion of the Criteria Document has
been extended. As result the overall schedule for the review of the PM
NAAQS has extended beyond the original target of July 2002. As with
other NAAQS reviews, a rigorous assessment of relevant scientific
information will be presented in a Criteria Document (CD) prepared by
EPA's National Center for Environmental Assessment. The EPA's Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards will then prepare a Staff Paper (SP)
for the Administrator which will evaluate the policy implications of
the key studies and scientific information contained in the CD and
additional technical analyses and identify critical elements that EPA
staff believe should be considered in reviewing the standards. The CD
and SP will be reviewed by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
(CASAC) and the public, and both final documents will reflect the input
received through these reviews. As the PM NAAQS review is completed,
the Administrator's proposal to revise or reaffirm the PM NAAQS will be
published with a request for public comment. Input received during the
public comment period will be considered in the Administrator's final
decision.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/05
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4255.
Agency Contact: Mary Ross, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5170
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: ross.mary@epamail.epa.gov
Karen Martin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5274
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: martin.karen@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI44
_______________________________________________________________________
3073. AMENDMENTS TO METHOD 24 (WATER-BASED COATINGS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 15, 2001, -.
Abstract: The determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
content of a surface coating by reference Method 24 involves
determination of its water content and calculation of its VOC content
as the difference of the two measurements (volatile content minus water
content). Method 24 is inherently less precise for water-based coatings
than it is for solvent-based coatings and the imprecision increases as
water content increases. This action will amend Method 24 by adding a
direct measurement procedurefor measuring VOC content of water-based
coatings, thereby improving the method's precision.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/05
Final Action 03/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3649.
Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-1064
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: sorrell.candace@epamail.epa.gov
Conniesue Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D205-02, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF72
_______________________________________________________________________
3074. GENERAL CONFORMITY REGULATIONS; REVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401-7671
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.850 to 51.860; 40 CFR 93.150 to 93.160
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act prohibits Federal
entities from taking actions which do not conform to the State
implementation plan (SIP) for the attainment and maintenance of the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). In November 1993, EPA
promulgated two sets of regulations to implement section 176(c). First,
on November 24, EPA promulgated the Transportation Conformity
Regulations to establish the criteria and procedures for determining
that transportation plans, programs, and projects which are funded
under title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act conform with the SIP.
Then, on November 30, EPA promulgated regulations, known as the General
Conformity Regulations, to ensure that other Federal actions also
conformed to the SIPs. The EPA has not reviewed or revised the General
Conformity Regulations since their 1993 promulgation. Several Federal
agencies have identified concerns over the implementation of the
General Conformity Regulations, including the requirements for areas
designated nonattainment for the newly promulgated NAAQS. In
conjunction with an ad hoc work group of representatives from several
Federal agencies, EPA will review the implementation of the General
Conformity Regulations. The EPA will then propose and promulgate any
appropriate revision to those regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/04
Final Action 11/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
[[Page 38186]]
Additional Information: SAN 4070.
Agency Contact: Annie Nikbakht, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-02, Durham, NC 27701
Phone: 919-541-5246
Fax: 919-541-0824
Email: nikbakht.annie@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Stonefield, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5350
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: stonefield.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH93
_______________________________________________________________________
3075. NESHAP: GROUP I POLYMERS AND RESINS AND GROUP IV POLYMERS AND
RESINS-AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.480 to 63.506 (Revision); 40 CFR 63.1310 to
63.1335 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: During the development of the National Emission Standard for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for elastomers (Group I polymers and
resins) and thermoplastics (Group IV polymers and resins) (RINs 2060-
AD56 and 2060-AE37), many of the provisions contained in the Hazardous
Organic NESHAP (HON) were referenced directly by these polymers and
resins regulations due to similarities in processes, emission
characteristics, and control technologies. On January 17, 1997, the EPA
promulgated changes to the HON to remove ambiguity, to clearly convey
EPA intent, and to make the rule easier to understand and implement in
response to industry petitions. It is necessary to make parallel
changes to the polymers and resins NESHAP; otherwise inconsistencies
will exist for NESHAPs regulating similar source categories. An ANPRM
was published in the Federal Register on 11/25/96 (61 FR 59849), to
explain the nature of changes planned. Subsequently, six litigants have
petitioned for review of the elastomers and thermoplastics regulations.
Four companies have petitioned EPA to reconsider specific provisions in
the thermoplastics regulation. Revisions will be proposed to parallel
HON changes and to resolve petitioners' issues.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 11/25/96 61 FR 59849
NPRM 1 03/09/99 64 FR 11559
Direct Final 2 06/08/99 64 FR 30406
NPRM 3 06/08/99 64 FR 60456
Direct Final 3 08/29/00 65 FR 52319
NPRM 4 08/29/00 65 FR 52319
Direct Final 4 10/26/00 65 FR 64161
Final 1 07/16/01 66 FR 36924
Final 2 08/06/01 66 FR 40903
NPRM 5 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3939.
Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH47
_______________________________________________________________________
3076. NSPS AND EMISSION GUIDELINES FOR OTHER SOLID WASTE INCINERATORS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7509 ``CAA 129''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, November 30, 2004, -.
Final, Judicial, November 30, 2005, -.
Abstract: Section 129 of the Clean Air Act of 1990 requires the Agency
to promulgate New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission
Guidelines (EG) for solid waste incinerators. Section 129 specifically
required the Administrator to publish a schedule for regulating Other
Solid Waste Incinerators (OSWI). A notice published on November 9, 2000
announced that the Administrator would promulgate OSWI standards by
November 15, 2005. The notice also listed what classes of incinerators
might be covered bythe OSWI standards. Standards will be set for the
following pollutants: particulate matter, opacity, sulfur dioxide,
hydrogen chloride, oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide, lead cadmium,
mercury, and dioxins and dibenzofurans.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice 11/09/00 65 FR 66850
NPRM 11/00/04
Final Action 11/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 3751.
Agency Contact: Fred Porter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5251
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: porter.fred@epamail.epa.gov
RobertJ Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG31
_______________________________________________________________________
3077. REVIEW OF NEW SOURCES AND MODIFICATIONS IN INDIAN COUNTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As required by the Clean Air Act's New Source Review (NSR)
provisions, the EPA is proposing Federal regulations governing
preconstruction permitting of major and minor stationary sources of air
pollution in Indian country. Pursuant to the Tribal Air Rule, eligible
Indian Tribes may receive EPA authorization to develop and implement
such programs. The Federal NSR permitting programs would be effective
throughout Indian country and would be implemented by EPA if eligible
Indian Tribes do not elect, or do not receive authorization, to manage such
[[Page 38187]]
programs. The proposed Federal NSR rule would require sources in Indian
country, with certain exceptions, to obtain a permit prior to
construction if they are: (1) new minor sources, (2) existing minor
sources undergoing modification, (3) new major sources in nonattainment
areas in Indian country, or (4) existing major sources in nonattainment
areas in Indian country undergoing minor modification. The proposed
rule also would allow new or existing stationary sources of regulated
NSR pollutants and HAPs to accept enforceable limits on their
production capacity or hours of operation in order to be considered
minor sources and avoid being subject to other Clean Air Act
requirements such as the title V operating permits program. These rules
would not impose any mandates on Tribal governments to implement NSR
permitting programs. Tribal governments may be affected, however,
insofar as they own or operate sources that must obtain a permit from
the EPA under the final Federal permitting program regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/05
Final Action 12/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Tribal
Energy Effects: Statement of Energy Effects planned as required by
Executive Order 13211.
Additional Information: SAN 3975.
Agency Contact: Raj Rao, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5344
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov
Laura McKelvey, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5497
Email: mckelvey.laura@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH37
_______________________________________________________________________
3078. CLEAN AIR FINE PARTICLE IMPLEMENTATION RULE
Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7501 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In 1997, EPA promulgated revised National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM-2.5). The rule
described in this paragraph -- the Implementation Rule for PM-2.5 NAAQS
-- will include requirements and guidance for State and local air
pollution agencies to develop and submit State implementation plans
(SIPs) designed to bring the areas into attainment with the 1997
standards. These SIP-development activities include conducting
technical analyses to identify effective strategies for reducing
emissions contributing to PM-2.5 levels, and adopting regulations as
needed in order to attain the standards. Ambient air quality monitoring
for 1999-2001 shows that areas exceeding the standards are located
throughout the eastern half of the U.S. and in California. Estimates
show that compliance with the standards will prevent thousands of
premature deaths from heart and lung disease, tens of thousands of
hospital admissions and emergency room visits, and millions of absences
from school and work every year.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4752.
Agency Contact: Rich Damberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5592
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov
Joe Paisie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5556
Email: paisie.joe@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK74
_______________________________________________________________________
3079. NSPS: SOCMI--WASTEWATER AND AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX C OF PART 63 AND
APPENDIX J OF PART 60
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 -- SOCMI Wastewater and Appendix J; 40 CFR 63
appendix C
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: These standards are based on a combination of control
techniques that require removal or destruction of volatile organic
compounds from wastewater at the synthetic organic chemical
manufacturing industry plant. Designated chemical process units, i.e.,
process lines or process units, would be subject to the rule.
Constructed, reconstructed, or modified designated chemical process
units would be required to apply appropriate controls to affected
wastewater tanks, surface impoundments, containers, individual drain
systems, and oil and water separators, and to treat process wastewater
to remove or destroy the volatile organic compounds. On September 12,
1994, EPA proposed Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources:
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from the Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Wastewater (40 CFR part 60, subpart
YYY). On October 11, 1995, the EPA issued a supplemental proposal,
which clarified and revised the previously proposed rule andproposed to
add Appendix J to 40 CFR part 60. On December 9, 1998, EPA published a
supplement to the proposed rule that consisted of revised definitions,
alternative test procedures, and clarifications of requirements. The
final rule encompasses the clarifications and revisions to Subpart YYY
and Appendix J that will reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds
(VOC). VOC, when emitted into the ambient air, are precursors to the
formation of tropospheric ozone. A wide variety of acute and chronic
respiratory health effects and welfare (agricultural, ecosystem)
effects have been attributed
[[Page 38188]]
to concentrations of ozone commonly measured in the ambient air
throughout the U.S.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM (NSPS) 09/12/94 59 FR 46780
Supp NPRM 1 10/11/95 60 FR 52889
Supp NPRM 2 12/09/98 63 FR 67988
NPRM (Appendix C Amendments) 07/00/04
Final Action 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3380.
Sectors Affected: 3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Kissell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-4516
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: kissell.mary@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE94
_______________________________________________________________________
3080. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION 16 - SPECIFICATIONS AND TEST PROCEDURES
FOR PREDICTIVE EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS IN STATIONARY SOURCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Performance Specification 16 is being proposed to provide
performance criteria for predictive emission monitoring systems.
Predictive systems represent a new technology that uses process
information or parameters to predict pollutant emissions instead of
directly measuring them. The Agency is allowing their use in recently-
promulgated rules and they are being considered by a number of
regulated facilities. The specification lists the requirements for
acceptable systems that are met by passing tests that compare the
monitoring system with standardized methods and audit gases to
determine system accuracy and stability. Performance Specification 16
will primarily apply to facilities whose emissions can be predicted
from process parameters such as combustion processes (including gas
turbines and internal combustion engines).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN 4119.
Sectors Affected: 336399 All Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing;
333618 Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing; 33241 Power Boiler and
Heat Exchanger Manufacturing; 333611 Turbine and Turbine Generator Set
Unit Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Foston Curtis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1806A, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-1063
Fax: 202-564-7299
Email: curtis.foston@epamail.epa.gov
Conniesue Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D205-02, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH84
_______________________________________________________________________
3081. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES: MUNICIPAL
SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS: AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7416; 42
USC 7429; 42 USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.750; 40 CFR 60.751; 40 CFR
60.752(b)(2)(iii)(B); 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2)(iii)(C); 40 CFR
60.752(b)(2)(iii)(D); 40 CFR 60758
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will amend the existing regulation entitled
Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills, subpart WWW of 40 CFR Part 60, promulgated on March
12, 1996. The amendment is being undertaken in response to requests to
clarify our intent regarding what constitutes an adequate landfill gas
treatment system. This action also clarifies our intent to exempt from
control landfill gas that is treated/upgraded. Furthermore, it
clarifies who is responsible for control of untreated landfill gas that
is sold. This action is necessary to clarify our intent regarding the
issues discussed above. It will improve implementation and compliance
with this regulation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Proposed Amdmt 05/23/02 67 FR 36476
Supplemental NPRM 07/00/04
Final Action 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4478.
Sectors Affected: 562212 Solid Waste Landfill
Agency Contact: Jolynn Collins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5671
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: collins.jolynn@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ41
_______________________________________________________________________
3082. NESHAP: PRINTING AND PUBLISHING INDUSTRY; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 1994, -.
Abstract: The amendments will clarify the rule and ensure it reflects
the EPA's intent.
[[Page 38189]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Final Action 02/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 4310.
Agency Contact: Dave Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI66
_______________________________________________________________________
3083. PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY NESHAP: AMENDMENT TO
IMPLEMENT COURT REMAND
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1340 to 63.1359
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry NESHAP was
promulgated June 14, 1999, and has been codified in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations 63, Subpart LLL. The Sierra Club and the National Lime
Association petitioned the court to review Subpart LLL, while the
American Portland Cement Alliance (APCA) opted to negotiate a
settlement agreement. (Note that there is currently a separate rule
under development to amend Subpart LLL to implement the settlement
agreement with the APCA -- SAN 4524, RIN 2060-AJ57.) On December 15,
2000, a panel of the D.C. Circuit issued its opinion in National Lime
Ass'n v. EPA. The Court remanded the three standards for which we
established floors of no control (hydrogen chloride [HCl], total
hydrocarbon [THC], and mercury [Hg]). The Court found that we committed
error in not considering other means of control, in particular, control
of HAPs in raw materials and in fossil fuels. The Court also remanded
that we consider setting beyond-the-floor standards for HAmetals, for
which particulate matter (PM) is a surrogate. This action will consist
of amendments to respond to the court remand.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4585.
Sectors Affected: 32731 Cement Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Keith Barnett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5605
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: barnett.keith@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ78
_______________________________________________________________________
3084. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR COKE OVEN BATTERIES - RESIDUAL
RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, October 27, 2001, National Emission
Standards for Coke Ovens - Residual Risk Standards.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 112(f), standard to protect
health and the environment is the statutory authority for this
rulemaking. In accordance with Section 112(f)(2), EPA must promulgate
residual risk standards 8 years after promulgation of emission
standards. We promulgated emission standards for charging, topside
leaks, and door leaks at coke ovens on October 27, 1993. This rule will
further reduce coke oven emissions from charging, topside leaks, and
door leaks at the affected coke plants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4620.
Sectors Affected: 331111 Iron and Steel Mills
Agency Contact: Lula Melton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2910
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: melton.lula@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ96
_______________________________________________________________________
3085. NESHAP: GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION (STAGE I) RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 14, 2002.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA. The current action, required
by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety. The facilities covered by the 112(d) standard and under
investigation in this project include both bulk gasoline terminals and
pipeline breakout stations that emit or at plant sites that emit major
source levels of airtoxics. Initial risk analyses have determined that
there are some facilities with non-low risk. An ample margin of safety
demonstration is under development.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4655.
Agency Contact: Steve Shedd, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
[[Page 38190]]
and Radiation, C439-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5397
Fax: 919 685-3195
Email: shedd.steve@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK10
_______________________________________________________________________
3086. NESHAP: INDUSTRIAL PROCESS COOLING TOWERS RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 30, 2002, -.
Abstract: A national emission standard for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for industrial process cooling towers (IPCT) was previously
promulgated under Section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. That standard
effectively bans the use of chromium-based water treatment chemicals in
IPCT used to remove heat from chemical or industrial processes. The
Clean Air Act Section 112(f) requires us to assess within 8 years of
promulgation of a NESHAP the remaining risk to the public and to
develop additional more stringent standards if such standards are
needed to protect the public health with an ample margin of safety.
This action is to examine the remaining risk from IPCT and, if
warranted, to develop new risk based standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4660.
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK16
_______________________________________________________________________
3087. NESHAP: PERCHLOROETHYLENE DRY CLEANING FACILITIES RESIDUAL RISK
STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based emission standards for this
source category under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. The current
action, required by Section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act, is to assess
residual risks and develop additional emission standards, as necessary,
to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4662.
Sectors Affected: 81232 Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-
Operated)
Agency Contact: Rhea Jones, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2940
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK18
_______________________________________________________________________
3088. NESHAP: WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS -- RESIDUAL RISK
STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 7, 2003, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart JJ. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from wood-
furniture manufacturing, including wood finishing, gluing, and
painting. The current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is
to assess residual risks from this same source category, and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4667.
Sectors Affected: 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing;
337211 Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Lynn Dail, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2363
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK21
_______________________________________________________________________
3089. PETITION TO DELIST HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT: 4,4'-METHYLENE
DIPHENYL DIISOCYANATE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to regulate 188 compounds that
are listed as air toxics, also known as hazardous air pollutants. Air
toxics are those pollutants known, or suspected, to cause cancer and
other human health problems. The law allows EPA to consider petitions
to modify the list, by adding or removing substances. Individuals
seeking to remove a substance must demonstrate that there are adequate
data to determine that emissions, outdoor concentrations,
bioaccumulation, or atmospheric deposition of the substance may not
reasonably be anticipated to damage human health or the environment. The
[[Page 38191]]
Agency received a petition to remove 4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl
Diisocyanate (MDI) from the American Chemistry Council on December 26,
2002. Once EPA receives a petition, it conducts two reviews: a
completeness review, to determine whether there is sufficient
information on which to base a decision; and a technical review, to
evaluate the merits of the petition. The EPA also requests and
considers information from the public. After a comprehensive technical
review of both the petition and the information received from the
public to determine whether the petition satisfies the requirements of
the CAA, the review team is required to make a recommendation to the
Administrator on whether to grant the petition. If the Administrator
decides to grant a petition, a proposed rule is published in the
Federal Register which proposes a modification of the HAP list and
presents the reasoning fordoing so. The proposed rule is open to public
comment and public hearing and all additional substantive information
received during the public's involvement is evaluated prior to the
decision on the issuance of a final rule. However, if the Administrator
decides to deny a petition, a notice setting forth an explanation of
the reasons for denial is published instead. A notice of denial
constitutes final Agency action of nationwide scope and applicability,
and is subject to judicial review as proded in the CAA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4782.
Agency Contact: Scott Jenkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1167
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: jenkins.scott@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK84
_______________________________________________________________________
3090. NATIONAL VOC EMISSION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS; PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511b
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Amendments to the consumer products rule are being proposed
to clarify and correct the rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Final Action 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4309.
Sectors Affected: 32599 All Other Chemical Product Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bruce Moore, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5460
Fax: 919 541-0072
Email: moore.bruce@epamail.epa.gov
Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5396
Fax: 919 541-0072
Email: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI62
_______________________________________________________________________
3091. CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FROM MOBILE SOURCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80; 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Motor vehicles are significant contributors to national
emissions of several hazardous air pollutants. These pollutants are
known or suspected to have serious health or environmental impacts.
Reducing emissions of these pollutants will reduce risk to public
health and welfare. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to periodically
revise requirements to control emissions of these pollutants from
mobile sources. EPA committed to this rulemaking in the preamble of the
last rulemaking on this topic, promulgated on March 29, 2001.
This rule will address the need for additional requirements, beyond
those associated with existing programs and other forthcoming rules, to
control hazardous air pollutants (air toxics) from motor vehicles,
nonroad engines and vehicles, and their fuels. Previous mobile source
programs for highway and nonroad sources and fuels have already reduced
air toxics significantly and will provide substantial further
reductions in coming years as new standards and programs are phased in.
This mobile-source air toxics rule will provide an overview of these
mobile source programs and associated toxics emissions reductions. The
rule will then address potential changes to gasoline fuel parameters to
reduce toxics such as benzene and the potential for additional vehicle
controls. We are also considering portable fuel container controls due
to their significant contribution to VOC emissions overall and the
potential for exposure to evaporative benzene emissions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/05
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4748.
Sectors Affected: 3361 Motor Vehicle Manufacturing; 3363 Motor Vehicle
Parts Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 4227 Petroleum and
Petroleum Products Wholesalers
Agency Contact: Christopher Lieske, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, ASD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4584
Fax: 734 214-4050
Email: lieske.christopher@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK70
[[Page 38192]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3092. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: PROCESS FOR EXEMPTING CRITICAL
USES OF METHYL BROMIDE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671c
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: With this action, EPA will revise the accelerated phaseout
regulations that govern the production, import, export, transformation
and destruction of substances that deplete the ozone layer. The
amendments will incorporate exemptions permitted under the Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and recent changes
to the Clean Air Act. Specifically, the amendments will create a
process to exempt production and consumption of quantities of methyl
bromide for critical and emergency uses from the 2005 phaseout of
methyl bromide. Because this is an exemption, the rule will confer a
benefit on affected entities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4535.
Agency Contact: Hodayah Finman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9246
Fax: 202 565-2079
Email: finman.hodayah@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ63
_______________________________________________________________________
3093. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: LISTING OF SUBSTITUTES FOR
OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES: N-PROPYL BROMIDE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule would list whether n-propylbromide (nPB) is an
acceptable substitute for class I and class II ozone depleting
substances used as solvents for general metals, precision, and
electronics cleaning, as well as in aerosol solvent and adhesives end
uses. This could provide another alternative to solvents with higher
ozone depletion potential that industry is interested in using. The
rule also would propose specific conditions on the use of nPB as a
solvent. These might include limiting thespecific applications in which
it may be used to those with low emissions and requiring exposure
limits consistent with industry practices. This will ensure that nPB is
used in a manner that is safe and environmentally protective. OSHA does
not currently regulate nPB. EPA would revise our ruling to adopt
whatever OSHA requires if OSHA later regulates the use of nPB. If
finalized as proposed, this rule would be consistent with most existing
industry practices and would impose little or no burden on industry.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/03/03 68 FR 33284
NPRM Correction 10/02/03 68 FR 56809
NPRM for Coatings 11/00/04
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4599. Split from RIN 2060-AJ58. The
previous ANPRM was under SAN No. 3525.
Sectors Affected: 331 Primary Metal Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal
Product Manufacturing; 333 Machinery Manufacturing; 334 Computer and
Electronic Product Manufacturing; 336 Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing; 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing; 32615
Urethane and Other Foam Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9163
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: sheppard.margaret@epamail.epa.gov
Erin Birgfeld, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9079
Fax: 202 343-2342
Email: birgfeld.erin@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK26
_______________________________________________________________________
3094. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ADJUSTING ALLOWANCES FOR CLASS
I SUBSTANCES FOR EXPORT TO ARTICLE 5 COUNTRIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action reinforces the economic incentives related to the
transition of Article 5 countries to ozone-depleting substance
alternatives. Currently, Article 5 allowances are determined as a
percentage of total production allowances assigned to US companies for
Class I ozone-depleting substances. In accordance with the Beijing
Amendments of the Montreal Protocol, this action establishes Article 5
allowances independently of total production allowances.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4697.
Agency Contact: Kate Choban, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9337
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: choban.kate@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
[[Page 38193]]
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK45
_______________________________________________________________________
3095. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (FIP) FOR THE BILLINGS/LAUREL, MONTANA
SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) AREA
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 12 USC 1701 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The State of Montana submitted a sulfur dioxide (SO2) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Billings/Laurel, Montana area. On 5/
2/02 and 5/22/03 we partially approved and partially disapproved
Montana's SO2 SIP for Billings/Laurel. EPA intends to propose a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) to cover those parts of the State's plan we
disapproved. EPA's FIP will assure that the Billings/Laurel area will
attain and maintain the SO2 NAAQS.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4542.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Laurie Ostrand, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office Denver, 8P-AR, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 303-312-6437
Fax: 303 312-6064
Email: ostrand.laurie@epamail.epa.gov
Cynthia Cody, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office Denver,
8P-AR, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 303-312-6228
Fax: 303 312-6064
Email: cody.cynthia@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2008-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________
3096. INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE RECALL REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511(a)(2)(b); 42 USC 7511(a)(2)(b)(2)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action specifies requirements for enhanced I/M programs
to establish a program to ensure compliance with recall notices. This
is pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 05/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3262.
Agency Contact: Buddy Polovick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4928
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: polovick.buddy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE22
_______________________________________________________________________
3097. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING REGULATIONS: REVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (Revision); 40 CFR 53 (Revision); 40 CFR 58
(Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Air pollution control authorities use air quality data to
determine compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and in subsequent work to develop air pollution mitigation strategies.
The data come primarily from ambient air monitoring stations run by
state and local agencies, although federal, tribal, and industrial
organizations also run stations. The design of the monitoring networks
is regulated under 40 CFR 58. This rule was originally written in 1979
and several revisions have been made in the intervening years. Air
pollution control authorities have improved their parts of the network
in response to changes in air quality, advances in the understanding of
the movements and health effects of air pollutants, and developments in
air pollution measurement technology. EPA has also cooperated with air
pollution control authorities to improve the networks, but we have not
revised the applicable regulations comprehensively. The proposed
revisions would remove real or perceived constraints on redeploying air
monitoring stations; more accurately reflect the roles of EPA and other
control authorities in designing, reviewing, and modifying networks;
bring provisions related to quality assurance up to date; and recognize
technological changes. The current regulations require states to
develop plans to deploy air monitoring networks. States generally
develop new plans only when new monitoring is needed, such as for a new
NAAQS. The regulations need to be revised to reflect the roles of EPA
and the state and local agencies.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Final Action 05/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4421.
Sectors Affected: 92411 Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste
Management; 334519 Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing
URL For Public Comments:
oar-2004-0018
Agency Contact: Tim Hanley, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-4417
Fax: 919 541-1903
Email: hanley.tim@epamail.epa.gov
Michael Papp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C339-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2408
Fax: 919 541-1903
[[Page 38194]]
Email: papp.michael@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ25
_______________________________________________________________________
3098. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES AND ENGINES:
ALTERNATIVE LOW-SULFUR HIGHWAY DIESEL FUEL TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR ALASKA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7625-1
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 69 and 80 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will carry out a flexibility provision for Alaska
that was included in EPA's heavy-duty diesel rule, which was
promulgated on January 18, 2001. That rule established more stringent
national emission standards for heavy-duty highway vehicles and engines
for the 2007 model year, and a technology-enabling sulfur limit of 15
ppm for highway diesel fuel beginning in 2006. In that rule, EPA
recognized Alaska's unique geographical, meteorological, air quality,
and economic factors and provided Alaska an opportunity to develop its
own plan to transition to low-sulfur highway diesel fuel, as an
alternative to the national transition program. Our goal in offering
this flexibility is to transition Alaska into the low-sulfur fuel
program in a manner that minimizes costs, while ensuring that the new
vehicles and engines receive the low-sulfur fuel they need. As stated
in the Federal Register notice for the diesel rule, if Alaska submits
an alternative plan by April 1, 2002, and if EPA determines that it
provides a reasonable alternative, EPA intends to initiate rulemaking
and, within one year from the date of Alaska's submittal, promulgate a
final rule to incorporate the alternative plan. A stakeholder process
to develop options is already underway in Alaska, and the State
informed EPA that it intends to submit an alternative transition plan
in late 2001 or early 2002. This action will be in response to that
anticipated submittal. We are also adding a related re-proposal to
implement nationwide diesel fuel content standards for nonroad,
locomotive and marine engines as it applies to Alaska's rural areas.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4570.
Sectors Affected: 336112 Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Richard Babst, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, EN-340-F, 6406-J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9473
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: babst.richard@epamail.epa.gov
Mike Shields, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406-
J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-9035
Fax: 202 565-2085
Email: shields.mike@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ72
_______________________________________________________________________
3099. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO GRANT ALTERNATIVE METHOD APPROVALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Currently, stationary source regulations cite specific test
methods to demonstrate compliance. If a source locates a test method
which will measure the regulated pollutant(s) with similar precision
and accuracy to the method cited in the regulation, and would like to
use the alternative method, the source must petition the EPA (along
with data documenting the applicability of the alternative) to allow
the alternative method. Each of these alternative method approvals by
letter may currently only be granted to a specific source. Source
category-wide approvals must be published for comment in the Federal
Register. Due to budgetary and time constraints, the process constrains
industry trade associations from developing and submitting alternative
test methods. Therefore, the purpose of this rulemaking is to modify
the regulations to allow source category-wide alternative method
approvals to be issued by letter.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4547.
Agency Contact: Rima Howell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, D205-02, EMC Building, D205-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0443
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: howell.rima@epamail.epa.gov
Conniesue Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D205-02, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ83
_______________________________________________________________________
3100. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTINUOUS PARAMETER MONITORING
SYSTEMS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 app B; 40 CFR 60 app F
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action proposes Performance Specification 17 (PS-17),
Quality Assurance (QA) Procedure 4, and amendments to Appendix F, QA
Procedure 1. Performance Specification 17 and QA Procedure 4 apply to
continuous parameter monitoring systems (CPMS). Many of the rules
promulgated under 40 CFR part 63 require owners and operators of
affected emission units to install and operate CPMS to monitor various
parameters, such as temperature, pressure, flow rate, and pH,
associated with the operation and performance of emission control
devices. However, few, if any, of those rules specify complete
procedures for ensuring the quality of the data measured by CPMS. The
proposed PS-17 establishes procedures and other requirements that will
ensure that those CPMS are properly selected, installed, and placed
[[Page 38195]]
into operation. The proposed QA Procedure 4 specifies procedures that
will ensure that those CPMS provide quality data on an ongoing basis.
Both PS-17 and QA Procedure 4 will help to ensure compliance with
emission limitations established under 40 CFR part 63. Procedure 1 of
Appendix F currently addresses QA procedures for continuous emission
monitoring systems (CEMS) that measure a single pollutant. The proposed
amendments to QA Procedure 1 broadens the procedure to address the
unique requirements of CEMS that are used for monitoring multiple
pollutants. Because several of the regulations promulgated under 40 CFR
part 63 require multiple pollutant CEMS, these amendments are needed to
ensure those CEMS are operated in a manner that ensures the quality of
the emission data collected. This action is not expected to have any
impacts on small entities or State, local, or tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4584.
Sectors Affected: 31-33 Manufacturing; 21 Mining; 486 Pipeline
Transportation; 562213 Solid Waste Combustors and Incinerators; 562212
Solid Waste Landfill; 22 Utilities
Agency Contact: Barrett Parker, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, EN-341W, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5635
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: parker.barrett@epamail.epa.gov
Fred Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2707
Email: thompson.fred@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ86
_______________________________________________________________________
3101. MODIFICATION OF ANTI-DUMPING BASELINES FOR GASOLINE PRODUCED OR
IMPORTED FOR USE IN HAWAII, ALASKA AND THE U.S. TERRITORIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: ``Dumping'' refers to the practice whereby refiners making
clean fuels for certain markets (such as reformulated gasoline for
clean-air purposes) take the pollutants removed from the clean fuels
and ``dump'' them into other fuels they are producing for other
markets. This, if allowed, would make those other fuels even dirtier
than before, and so the Clean Air Act prohibits this practice. EPA has
existing ``anti-dumping'' rules on the books that codify this Clean Air
Act prohibition. This action proposes to allow refiners and importers
of conventional gasoline produced or imported for use in Hawaii,
Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to petition EPA to
modify their baselines to use the most appropriate seasonal baseline
and Complex Model for purposes of compliance with the RFG program's
anti-dumping requirements. Specifically, this action would allow
refiners and importers to petition EPA to use the summer Complex Model
for all anti-dumping baseline and compliance determinations for
conventional gasoline produced or imported for use in Hawaii, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. This action would allow
refiners and importers to petition EPA to use the winter Complex Model
for all anti-dumping baseline and compliance purposes in Alaska. We are
proposing this action to address certain inconsistencies in the RFG
program's anti-dumping provisions which may have significant unintended
negative impacts on refiners and importers. In addition, this action
proposes to modify the anti-dumping provisions to address compliance in
certain situations where a refinery becomes non-operational during the
annual averaging period. This action is intended to address compliance
issues where a refinery does not produce sufficient ``summer'' gasoline
to offset the higher emissions of ``winter'' gasoline due to the
refinery becoming non-operational during the annual averaging period.
Today's proposed actions would not compromise the environmental goals
of the RFG program, or result in any environmental degradation. Today's
proposed actions would not have any negative impact on small businesses
or state/local/tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4632.
Agency Contact: Marilyn Bennett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9624
Email: bennett.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK02
_______________________________________________________________________
3102. PERFORMANCE-BASED MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR FUELS: CRITERIA FOR SELF-
QUALIFYING ALTERNATIVE TEST METHODS; DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONAL STATISTICAL
QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Transportation fuels (like gasoline and diesel fuel) are
regulated by EPA under the Clean Air Act to control the emissions that
result when they are burned in engines, and also to protect engines'
emission control equipment. Fuels regulations require measurement of
various of the fuels' properties, and prescribe ``designated''
analytical methods for that purpose. This regulation is intended to
provide a way for regulated parties to self-qualify alternatives to the
designated measurement methods that may be cheaper, quicker, simpler,
more amenable to automation, or otherwise preferable. The regulation
will also prescribe a minimum level of statistical quality control for
all fuels test methods, designated or alternative. The regulations
should quicken the
[[Page 38196]]
adoption of new measurement technologies by removing the need for
multiple method-specific rulemakings, but to do so in a way that will
not degrade the performance of the overall measurement system. The
qualification criteria are designed to admit only methods that are as
precise as the designated methods and can be made to accurately predict
designated method measurements. Introduction of statistical quality
control for all methods should improve measurement precision and
accuracy in actual practice across all methods.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4633.
Sectors Affected: 324199 All Other Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing; 54199 All Other Professional, Scientific and Technical
Services; 42271 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals; 48691 Pipeline
Transportation of Refined; 334516 Analytical Laboratory Instrument
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: John Holley, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9305
Fax: 202 233-9557
Email: holley.john@epamail.epa.gov
Joe Sopata, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9034
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: sopata.joe@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK03
_______________________________________________________________________
3103. REGULATION OF FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVES: EXTENSION OF CALIFORNIA
ENFORCEMENT EXEMPTIONS FOR REFORMULATED GASOLINE TO CALIFORNIA PHASE 3
GASOLINE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.81
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing to exempt refiners, importers, and blenders
of gasoline subject to the State of California's reformulated gasoline
regulations from certain enforcement provisions in the federal
reformulated (RFG) regulations. Certain exemptions under the federal
RFG program already apply to California Phase 2 gasoline, but
additional exemptions are necessary to cover Phase 3 gasoline.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4634.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 32511 Petrochemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Anne--Marie Pastorkovich, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9623
Email: pastorkovich.anne-marie@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Kortum, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9022
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: kortum.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK04
_______________________________________________________________________
3104. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY RULE AMENDMENTS FOR NEW 8-HOUR OZONE AND
PM2.5 NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 and 93
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The transportation conformity rule ensures that
transportation planning is consistent with a state's plans for
achieving the air quality standards. These amendments to the existing
transportation conformity rule are necessary as a result of the new 8-
hour ozone and PM2.5 air quality standards. The main issues that will
be addressed in these amendments are the regional emissions tests that
apply before new SIPs are submitted and which particulate matter
provisions of the rule apply to PM2.5.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/05/03 68 FR 62690
Supplemental NPRM 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
Additional Information: SAN 4811. 2060-AI56 was merged into this action
May 2004
Agency Contact: Meg Patulski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4842
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: patulski.meg@epamail.epa.gov
Angela Spickard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 49105
Phone: 734-214-4283
Email: spickard.angela@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL73
_______________________________________________________________________
3105. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AND NONATTAINMENT
NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR): ALLOWABLES PLANTWIDE APPLICABILITY LIMIT (PAL),
AGGREGATION, AND DEBOTTLENECKING
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: These rules clarify when less than significant emissions
increases from multiple activities at a single major stationary source
must be considered together for the purposes of determining major new
source review (NSR) applicability (aggregation). We are also changing
in the way emissions from permitted emissions units upstream or
downstream from those undergoing a physical change or change in the
method of operation are considered when determining if a proposed
project will result in a
[[Page 38197]]
significant emissions increase (debottlenecking). The rules also
provide an allowables plantwide applicability limit (PAL) option that
is based on the allowable emissions from major stationary sources. A
PAL is an optional approach that provides the owners or operators of
major stationary sources with the ability to manage facility-wide
emissions without triggering major NSR. The added flexibility of a PAL
allows sources to respond rapidly to market changes consistent with the
goals of the NSR program. The regulations for aggregation and
debottlenecking are intended to improve implementation of the program
by articulating principles for determining major NSR applicability that
were previously addressed through guidance only. The purpose of the
allowables PAL rule is to encourage major stationary sources to install
state-of-the-art controls in exchange for regulatory certainty and
flexibility.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Final Action 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4793.
Agency Contact: Raj Rao, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5344
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov
Juan Santiago, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C33903, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1084
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL75
_______________________________________________________________________
3106. CLEAN AIR INTERSTATE RULE; FORMERLY TITLED INTERSTATE AIR QUALITY
RULE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, 72, 75, 96
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Many pollutant types and sources contribute to ambient levels
of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone that exceed national air
quality standards, and to regional haze that adversely affects
visibility in federal Class I areas. Some of these pollutants may
originate tens or hundreds of miles from the areas where violations of
the national ambient air quality standards are detected, from sources
that are outside the jurisdiction of the State that is harmed. The
Clean Air Act requires that a State take steps to prevent emissions
from sources located within its boundaries from interfering with a
downwind State's ability to meet air quality standards, or interfering
with measures to protect visibility. EPA believes it is important to
address interstate transport of PM2.5 and 8-hour ozone prior to the
time when State plans addressing nonattainment of the standards are
completed, so that States can rely on upwind reductions when developing
plans for attaining the standards. The Bush Administration has proposed
Clear Skies legislation that will help reduce interstate transport of
pollution from the largest emitters in the power generation sector.
This mandatory program would dramatically reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2),
nitrogen oxides (NOx), and mercury by setting a national cap on
emissions of each pollutant from power generators. Trading would
provide sources with flexibility to reduce their emissions in most
efficient and least costly way. EPA prefers to address the issue of
transported pollution from power generators through Clear Skies
legislation rather than rulemaking. Because enactment of legislation is
inherently uncertain, in addition to promoting legislation EPA is
initiating this rulemaking as a potential substitute to achieve part of
what would be achieved by Clear Skies. Also, if analysis warrants, this
rulemaking could supplement legislation by addressing categories of
emissions sources not covered by the legislation. Further, EPA will
conduct updated tranport analyses to determine whether emission
reductions beyond the already-promulgated NOx SIP Call (63 FR 57355)
are warranted for purposes of the 8-hour ozone standard. Under the
interstate air quality rule, EPA would establish state-level emissions
reduction requirements for transported pollutants, and offer compliance
flexibility in the form of an emissions trading program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/30/04 69 FR 4566
Supplemental NPRM 06/00/04
Notice of Data Availability 08/00/04
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4794.
Agency Contact: Scott Mathias, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, C539-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5310
Fax: 919-541-0237
Email: mathias.scott@epamail.epa.gov
Joe Paisie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5556
Email: paisie.joe@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL76
_______________________________________________________________________
3107. SECTION 126 RULE: LIFTING THE 8-HOUR STAY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 75; 40 CFR 97
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 29, 2004, Statutory Final:
Must be signed and sent to the Hill by 11/29/04 or the section 126
findings will be triggered on 11/30/04.
Abstract: Section 126 of the CAA allows States to petition EPA for a
finding that emissions from stationary sources in other States
significantly contribute to nonattainment problems in the petitioning
State. If EPA approves a petition, EPA would establish Federal
requirements for the sources. In April 1999, EPA finalized action on 8
petitions submitted by Northeastern States for purposes of mitigating
interstate transport of NOx, one of the main precursors of ground-level
ozone. Subsequent court rulings caused EPA to stay the portion of the
rule based on the 8-hour ozone standard. Now, the aforementioned
[[Page 38198]]
court challenges have been resolved, enabling EPA to lift the stay on
the 8-hour portion of the rule. This action would accomplish the
removal of that stay and complete EPA's action on the 8-hour petitions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4095.1. Split from RIN 2060-AH88.
Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL79
_______________________________________________________________________
3108. SECTION 126 RULE: WITHDRAWAL OF FINDINGS FOR SOURCES IN MICHIGAN
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52.34
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In response to petitions submitted by four Northeastern
States, in January 2000, EPA issued the Section 126 Rule which required
sources in Michigan and certain other States to reduce nitrogen oxides
(NOx) emissions for the purpose of reducing interstate ozone transport.
EPA coordinated the Section 126 Rule with another rule known as the NOx
State implementation plan (SIP) Call, which also addresses ozone
transport in the eastern half of the United States. EPA established a
mechanism in the Section 126 Rule whereby the rule would be withdrawn
for sources in a State if the State submitted, and EPA approved, a SIP
that complied with the NOx SIP Call. This was a practical way to
address the overlap between the two rules and avoid having sources be
subject to two sets of potentially different NOx transport control
requirements. As the result of court actions, the compliance dates for
the Section 126 Rule and the NOx SIP Call have been delayed and the NOx
SIP Call has been divided into two phases. Therefore, in a separate
action, EPA proposed to revise the Section 126 Rule withdrawal
provision so that it will continue to operate under these new
circumstances. Under that proposal, where a State submits a NOx SIP
that meets only Phase 1 of the NOx SIP Call, EPA would need to make a
determination that the SIP controls the total group of Section 126
sources to the same stringency as the Section 126 Rule would before the
Section 126 Rule could be withdrawn. The EPA has reviewed and isin the
process of approving the Michigan NOx SIP. In this current action, EPA
is proposing that the SIP meets the newly proposed Section 126 Rule
withdrawal criteria, and therefore, EPA is proposing to withdraw the
redundant Section 126 Rule for sources in Michigan.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local
Additional Information: SAN 4796.
Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov
Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: grano.doug@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL83
_______________________________________________________________________
3109. LIFTING THE STAY OF THE EIGHT-HOUR PORTION OF THE FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION AND RULEMAKING FOR PURPOSES OF REDUCING
INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT (NOX SIP CALL)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.121
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In the Nitrogen Oxides State Implementation Plan Call (NOx
SIP Call)(63 FR 57356, October 27, 1998), EPA found that emissions of
NOx from 22 States and the District of Columbia (hereinafter referred
to as `23 States') significantly contribute to downwind areas'
nonattainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA also separately found that
NOx emissions from the same 23 States significantly contribute to
downwind nonattainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Subsequently, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for theDistrict of Columbia Circuit (D.C.
Circuit) remanded the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. [American Trucking
Associations, Inc. v. EPA, 175 F.3d 1027 on rehearing 195 F.3d 4 (D.C.
Cir. 1999).]
EPA stayed the 8-hour basis of the NOx SIP Call rule on
September 18, 2000 (65 FR 56245) based on the uncertainty created by
the D.C. Circuit's decision. EPA has now completed the actions
necessary to address the aforementioned remand, and therefore is now
conducting rulemaking to lift the stay. EPA is proposing tolift the
stay of our findings in the NOx SIP Call contained in 40 CFR Sec.
51.121(a)(2), related to the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). This action does not create any new requirements; it
merely reinstitutes a requirement of the NOx SIP Call that had
previously been stayed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/05
Final Action 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Local, State
Additional Information: SAN 4797.
Agency Contact: Jan King, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5665
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: king.jan@epamail.epa.gov
Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
[[Page 38199]]
Email: grano.doug@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL84
_______________________________________________________________________
3110. AMENDMENTS TO LEATHER FINISHING NESHAP
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On February 27, 2002, EPA promulgated National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Leather
Finishing Operations industry. EPA was subsequently petitioned by two
affected facilities concerning the definition of specialty leather. EPA
has engaged in negotiations with these facilities concerning the
definition and is issuing these technical corrections to address the
concerns. The amendments to the rule will clarify the definition of
specialty leather and provide a means of determining what kinds of
leather meet the definition of specialty leather.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4802.
Agency Contact: William Schrock, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5032
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: schrock.bill@epa.gov
Andrew Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 214-665-7332
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: waite.andrew@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL89
_______________________________________________________________________
3111. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE; ALLOWANCE SYSTEM FOR
CONTROLLING HCFC PRODUCTION, IMPORT AND EXPORT; CORRECTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Although an allowance allocation system for controlling
hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) production, import, and export was
established with publication of the final rule on January 21, 2003 (SAN
4120, RIN 2060-AH67), several issues associated with that system have
arisen that need to be amended for clarity and consistency.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4804.
Agency Contact: Vera Au, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9215
Fax: 202-343-2337
Email: au.vera@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL90
_______________________________________________________________________
3112. AMENDMENTS TO THE NESHAP FOR CELLULOSE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On July 11, 2002, EPA promulgated National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Cellulose Products
Manufacturing industry. The EPA was subsequently petitioned by two
affected facilities concerning several issues. The EPA has engaged in
negotiations with these facilities concerning the issues and is issuing
these amendments to address the concerns. The amendments clarify
several definitions and provide clearer and consistent directions on
complying with the standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Final Action 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4808.
Agency Contact: Bill Schrock, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5032
Email: schrock.bill@epamail.epa.gov
Andrew Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 214-665-7332
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: waite.andrew@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL91
_______________________________________________________________________
3113. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR VEHICLES: ON-
BOARD DIAGNOSTIC REQUIREMENTS FOR HEAVY-DUTY ENGINES AND VEHICLES ABOVE
14,000 POUNDS AND IN-USE, NOT-TO-EXCEED EMISSION STANDARD TEST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing to establish On-Board Diagnostic (OBD)
requirements for Heavy-Duty On-Highway and Non-Road vehicles and
engines greater than 14,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. This action
will also propose to require manufacturers of these vehicles and
engines to make available emissions-related service information to
after market service providers. OBD systems are intended to monitor the
performance of emission controls on these vehicles and engines to
ensure proper functionality and compliance with emissions standards.
This notice also proposes a manufacturer run in use testing program for
heavy-duty engines and vehicles to assess compliance with the
applicable not to exceed standards beginning in 2007. This portion of
the notice has a court-ordered date for May 2004 and final May 2005 as
a result
[[Page 38200]]
of a settlement between EPA, ARB, and Engine Manufacturers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4809.
Agency Contact: Arvon Mitcham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4522
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: mitcham.arvon@epamail.epa.gov
Holly Pugliese, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4288
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: pugliese.holly@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL92
_______________________________________________________________________
3114. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: QUANTITY ALLOCATION OF METHYL
BROMIDE FOR CRITICAL USE EXEMPTIONS AFTER THE PHASEOUT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: PL 105-277, sec 764
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on
substances that deplete the ozone layer, this rule will seek to
allocate quantities of methyl bromide for critical use exemptions to
entities within the United States based on amounts of methyl bromide
authorized by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol for use after the
2005 phase-out date. This action is a deregulatory action that will
reduce burden on producers, importers, distributors and applicators of
methyl bromide as well as end-users of methyl bromide who are growers
and owners of stored food products.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/04
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4820.
Agency Contact: Marta Montoro, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9321
Fax: 202 343-2337
Email: montoro.marta@epamail.epa.gov
Hodayah Finman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9246
Fax: 202 565-2079
Email: finman.hodayah@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL95
_______________________________________________________________________
3115. 5-YEAR REVIEW OF MACT STANDARDS FOR LARGE MWC
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, April 28, 2006.
Abstract: Under section 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required
to adopt and implement maximum achievable control technology (MACT)
standards for both new and existing large municipal waste combustion
units (MWC). Those MACT standards have been adopted and fully
implemented with all retrofits completed. Section 129(a)(5)of the CAA
requires EPA to review and, if necessary, revise those standards every
5 years. This rulemaking addresses those requirements and is the first
5-year review of the MACT standards. Implementation of these MACT
standards has been highly effective and has reduced dioxin/furan
emissions by more than 99 percent since 1990 and mercury emissions by
more than 95 percent since 1990. Similar reductions have occurred for
other CAA section 129 pollutants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/04
Final Action 05/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4829.
Agency Contact: Walt Stevenson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C-439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5264
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: stevenson.walt@epamail.epa.gov
RobertJ Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL97
_______________________________________________________________________
3116. ALTERNATIVE WORK PRACTICE FOR LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60, 61, and 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule would amend existing regulations controlling
emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) under the Clean Air Act.
These regulations are codified at 40 CFR Part 60, 61, and 63. These
regulations require periodic leak detection and repair (LDAR) of pumps
and valves. The current work practice requires each pump and valve to
be individually monitored for leaks. Facilities have had LDAR programs
in place for nearly 20 years and view them as burdensome because they
are labor intensive.Newer laser based monitoring technology is being
developed which will detect leaks at a reduced costs because of the
ability to monitor multiple components at one time. This rule would
amend the existing regulations to enable the plant operators to use the
new technology.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/05
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4830.
[[Page 38201]]
Agency Contact: David Markwordt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C435-B, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0837
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: markwordt.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL98
_______________________________________________________________________
3117. NESHAP: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS--
AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1960; 40 CFR 63.1975; 40 CFR 63.1980
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will address issues concerning the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills, that was published on January 16, 2003. We will revise the
startup, shutdown, and malfunction provisions promulgated in the rule
in response to requests for more flexibility. We will clarify that the
moisture balance calculations should be calculated on a wet weight
basis as a response to requests about the intent of the promulgated
rule. We will correct errors in the compliance dates for the rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4846.
Agency Contact: Jolynn Collins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5671
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: collins.jolynn@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM08
_______________________________________________________________________
3118. ADDITION OF CO EMISSION LIMIT FOR LARGE MWC
USING FLUID BED COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY (SECTION 129)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 and 62
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA adopted air emission
regulations (``emission guidelines'') for both large and small existing
municipal waste combustors (MWC). The emission guidelines were adopted
under the CAA section 129 and were based on the application of maximum
achievable control technology. The emission guidelines for large MWC
were adopted in December 1995, and the emission guidelines for small
MWC were adopted in December 2000. The emission guidelines are
implemented through State plans developed under CAA section 111(d)/129.
Where a State plan has not been developed, a Federal plan implements
the emission guidelines. The emission guidelines for both large and
small MWC include application of good combustion practices (GCP) to
minimize the generation of air pollutants during combustion. The GCP
includes emission limits for CO. The emission guidelines include
different CO limits for different combustor types. The emission
guidelines for small MWC included a unique CO limit for fluidized bed
combustion technology firing mixtures of wood and municipal waste
(mixed fuels). The guidelines for large MWCs did not include such a
unique CO limit because this there were no known large MWCs that used
this technology. In late 1999, an enforcement action determined an MWC
classified as a small MWC was actually a large MWC. The EPA
reclassified that MWC as a large MWC, and it was therefore required to
meet the large-MWC guidelines. However, the large MWC emission
guidelines do not currently contain a unique CO limit for this
combustor type, and so the unique limit must be added by amending the
original guidelines. This rulemaking action would add a unique CO limit
to the large MWC guidelines (subpart Cb) and Federal Plan (subpart
FFF). The CO limit we propose to add is the same 200 ppmV CO limit
contained in the small MWC emission guidelines.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Amendments 06/00/04
DFRM Amendments 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4844.
Agency Contact: Walt Stevenson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C-439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5264
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: stevenson.walt@epamail.epa.gov
RobertJ Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM11
_______________________________________________________________________
3119. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--ETHYLENE OXIDE
HOSPITAL STERILIZATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to list source categories
that contribute to the emissions of 30 listed (or area source) HAPs,
and that are, or will be, subject to standards under section 112 of the
Act. Sterilization processes use ethylene oxide which is one of the 30
listed HAPs. Hospital sterilization is a major source of ethylene oxide
relative to other are source categories considered for listing.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/05
Final Action 04/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4859.
Agency Contact: David Markwordt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C435-B, Washington, DC 20460
[[Page 38202]]
Phone: 919-541-0837
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: markwordt.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM14
_______________________________________________________________________
3120. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: RESTRICTION
ON THE SALES OF PRE-CHARGED SPLIT SYSTEMS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On January 27, 1995, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) temporarily stayed the sales and distribution restriction for
class I and class II ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) used as
refrigerants, as it applies to refrigerant contained in appliances
without fully assembled refrigerant circuits (i.e., split system air
conditioners). On May 9, 1995, EPA extended the stay on the sales and
distribution prohibition for class I and class II ODSs used as
refrigerants, only as it applies to split systems consisting of parts
that are pre-charged with a class I or class II ODS. Today's action
proposes to rescind the partial stay, and proposes to restrict the sale
of split systems consisting of parts that are pre-charged with a class
I or class II ODS, to section 608 technicians certified in accordance
with the applicable refrigerant regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/30/04
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4851.
Agency Contact: Jabeen Akhtar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9313
Fax: 202-564-2155
Email: akhtar.jabeen@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM15
_______________________________________________________________________
3121. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR
VEHICLES: IN-USE, NOT-TO-EXCEED EMISSION STANDARD TESTING FOR HEAVY-DUTY
DIESEL ENGINES AND VEHICLES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 1065
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, June 3, 2004, Lawsuit settlement
agreement regarding not-to-exceed (NTE) emission standards, engine
manufacturers vs. EPA.
Final, Judicial, May 1, 2005, Lawsuit settlement agreement regarding
not-to-exceed (NTE) emission standards, engine manufacturers vs. EPA.
Abstract: EPA and the Engine Manufacturers Association reached a
lawsuit settlement agreement that will result in a manufacturer-run,
in-use emissions testing program for heavy-duty diesel trucks.
Manufacturers will monitor compliance with certain emission standards,
called the Not-to-Exceed (NTE) standards, by testing in-use diesel
engines during normal vehicle operation using portable emission
measurement systems for the first time.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4845.
Agency Contact: Rich Wilcox, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4390
Email: wilcox.rich@epamail.epa.gov
Rick Gezelle, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9267
Email: gezelle.rick@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM17
_______________________________________________________________________
3122. PETITION TO DELIST A HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT
FROM SECTION 112 OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT: METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (MIBK)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Ketones Panel of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) has
petitioned the Agency to remove methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) from the
Clean Air Act (CAA) hazardous air pollutant (HAP) list. The ACC
originally submitted the petition in April of 1997. EPA suspended
review of the petition pending the completion of 2-generation
reproductive effects study. The study is now complete. On October 17,
2003, the ACC submitted an addendum to the 1997 petition which
includes: the results of the 2-generationreproductive effects study, a
presentation of the updated EPA IRIS file for MIBK, updated air
dispersion modeling and an analysis of potential transformation
products. Based on this new submission, the ACC requests that EPA
reopen its review of the MIBK petition.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/05
Final Action 04/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4849.
Agency Contact: Mark Morris, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5416
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: morris.mark@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM20
[[Page 38203]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3123. AMENDMENTS TO VEHICLE INSPECTION AND
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS TO ADDRESS NEW 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: We propose to amend the current vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M) rule to establish deadlines for areas newly required
to begin I/M testing as a result of their classification under the 8
hour ozone standard. Specifically, the amendments will address: the
deadline for submitting I/M State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for those
new areas; the deadline for the new program start-up; and the model
year coverage and evaluation timeframes associated with new programs
that willl potentially be required as part of EPA's implementation of
the 8-hour ozone standard.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/04
Final Action 10/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN 4854.
Agency Contact: Dave Sosnowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4823
Fax: 734 214-4906
Email: sosnowski.dave@epamail.epa.gov
Joe Pedelty, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4410
Email: pedelty.joe@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM21
_______________________________________________________________________
3124. NESHAP: HYDROCHLORIC ACID PRODUCTION AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On April 17, 2003, EPA promulgated national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for the Hydrochloric
Acid Production industry. Subsequent to promulgation, EPA received a
number of concerns and issues from the industry related to technical
corrections, definitions, and applicability matters. The EPA is
amenable to making many of the suggested corrections but believe that
proposal of the changes is necessary. In addition, the OSWER would like
to include the storage and transfer operations at sources subject to
their HCl production rule to the subpart NNNNN rule which would also
require proposal. The amendments are expected to have little or no
impact on the plants now covered by the HCl production rule. No adverse
economic impacts are expected. the total nationwide capital and annual
costs associated with the amendments are negligible. No price impacts
are projected. No significant impacts on a substantial number of small
entities are expected.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4867.
Agency Contact: Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov
RobertJ Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM25
_______________________________________________________________________
3125. STRATEGY FOR ADDRESSING AIR EMISSIONS FROM
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 12 USC 1701 et seq
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This notice describes a strategy for addressing air emissions
from animal feeding operations (AFOs). In this notice, we summarize the
public concerns that have been raised about emissions from AFOs and
explain the substantial scientific uncertainties pertaining to emission
levels, public health and welfare effects, and emission control
techniques for this industry. Resolving all the uncertainties will
require substantial time and research. Nevertheless, some cost
effective management practices for reducing emissions are available
today, and the use of these practices will mitigate some of the adverse
effects of these emissions. Early public input on a set of goals for an
emission control program for AFOs and on an intended regulatory
approach to begin reducing AFO emissions and solving some of the
environmental problems based on information that is available today.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 06/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4865.
Agency Contact: Bill Schrock, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5032
Email: schrock.bill@epamail.epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM26
_______________________________________________________________________
3126. REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSMIX PROCESSING AND
BLENDING UNDER THE REFORMULATED GASOLINE AND GASOLINE SULFUR RULES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545(c); 42 USC 7545(k)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 38204]]
Abstract: This rule codifies existing guidance for transmix processors
and blenders in the Reformulated Gasoline regulations. Transmix is a
mixture of gasoline and distillate produced by pipelines - transmix
processors distill the transmix into separate gasoline and distillate
products, and transmix blenders blend small amounts of transmix into
gasoline. The rule also establishes gasoline sulfur standards for
transmix processors and blenders that are consistent with the sulfur
standards for other entities downstream of refineries, such as
pipelines and terminals, in the gasoline distribution system. The rule
will provide operational flexibility for transmix processors and
blenders without causing any adverse environmental impacts.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4853.
Agency Contact: Chris McKenna, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9037
Fax: 240 363-8260
Email: mckenna.chris@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM27
_______________________________________________________________________
3127. NESHAP: SITE REMEDIATION; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Site Remediation regulation was promulgated on October 8,
2003. This action is intended to revise language in the final rule to
correct errors or language that doesn't reflect our intent.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4866.
Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3078
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: nizich.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM30
_______________________________________________________________________
3128. EXEMPTION OF AREA SOURCES FROM TITLE V
OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 502
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would implement the Agency's decision on whether
to require title V permits for six area (nonmajor) sources subject to
air toxic requirements under Clean Air Act. The affected source
categories are: dry cleaners, halogenated solvent degreasers, chrome
plating, ethylene oxide sterilizers, secondary lead, and secondary
aluminum. Under the Act, these sources are subject to operating permit
programs; however, EPA may exempt them from such programs if it finds
that permitting would be impracticable, infeasible or unnecessarily
burdensome on the sources. This action makes these findings for all
categories except secondary lead and presents them for public comment.
Secondary lead would remain subject to permitting because it few area
sources are affected and most have already been permitted.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/04
Final Action 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4868.
Agency Contact: Ray Vogel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C304-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3153
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: vogel.ray@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM31
_______________________________________________________________________
3129. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR
VEHICLES AND NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ENGINES: AMENDMENTS TO EVAPORATIVE
EMISSIONS REGULATIONS AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action includes technical amendments to several portions
of certification requirements and test procedures applicable to light-
duty vehicles, light duty trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles. These
amendments include minor revisions to clarify regulations. These
amendments also include revisions to the evaporative compliance
procedures, which are intended to reduce the certification burden
associated with conducting 2-day, 3-day, and ORVR procedures without
affecting the level of stringency, ref. EPA guidance letter CCD-02-20,
December 31, 2002; (Subject: Request for Comments on Potential
Evaporative Regulation Changes; Evaporative Guidance for Certification
and In-use Testing).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Direct Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4880.
Agency Contact: Julia Rege, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4614
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: rege.julia@epamail.epa.gov
Lynn Sohacki, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
[[Page 38205]]
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4851
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: sohacki.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM32
_______________________________________________________________________
3130. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION FOR
NITROGEN OXIDES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: None
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, September 30, 2004.
Final, Judicial, September 30, 2005.
Abstract: Section 166 of the Clean Air Act authorizes the Environmental
Protection Agency to establish regulations to prevent significant
deterioration of air quality due to emissions of nitrogen oxides. On
October 17, 1988, EPA promulgated regulations which included maximum
allowable increases in ambient nitrogen dioxide concentrations (NO2
increments) allowed in an area above the baseline concentration.
Following promulgation, the Environmental Defense (formerly the
Environmental Defense Fund) filed a petition asking the Court to order
EPA to remand the regulations and to impose an immediate deadline of
two years for promulgating new regulations. In 1990, the Court did not
impose a deadline but remanded the case for EPA to develop an
interpretation of Section 166 that considered the statutory provisions
contained in subsections (c) and (d), and if necessary to take new
evidence and modify the regulations. In July 2003, Earthjustice, on
behalf of Environment Defense, asked the Court to put EPAon an
enforceable schedule to issue new regulations under the original court
remand. Consequently, EPA agreed to a two-year schedule for
promulgating such regulations by September 30, 2005. At a minimum, the
regulations will provide EPA's interpretation of the statutory
requirements for developing adequate increments to prevent significant
deterioration for nitrogen oxides. Based on our interpretation, we will
consider the need for revising the existing increments for nitrogen
dioxide, including both an annual and short-term averaging period, and
the regulation of other nitrogen oxide compounds other than nitrogen
dioxide.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 09/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4881.
Agency Contact: Dan Deroeck, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5593
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: deroeck.dan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM33
_______________________________________________________________________
3131. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM SPARK-IGNITION
ENGINES AND FUEL SYSTEMS FROM MARINE VESSELS AND SMALL EQUIPMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521 to 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 90
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, December 1, 2004.
Final, Statutory, December 31, 2005.
Abstract: In this action, we are proposing exhaust emission standards
for spark-ignition marine engines and small land-based engines (< 19
kW). We are also proposing evaporative emission standards for vessels
and equipment using these engines. Nationwide, these emission sources
contribute to ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM)
nonattainment. These pollutants cause a range of adverse health
effects, especially in terms of respiratory impairment and related
illnesses. The proposed standards would help States achieve and
maintain air quality standards. In addition, these standards would help
reduce acute exposure to CO, air toxics, and PM.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Final Action 12/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4882.
Agency Contact: Glenn Passavant, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4408
Email: passavant.glenn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM34
_______________________________________________________________________
3132. TEST PROCEDURES FOR HIGHWAY AND NONROAD ENGINES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1065
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulation aims to harmonize test procedures from the
various EPA programs for controlling engine emissions. It will not
address emission standards, nor will it lead to additional emission
reductions. Rather, it will amend 40 CFR part 1065, which contains
laboratory specifications for equipment and test fuels, instructions
for preparing engines and running tests, calculations for determining
final emission levels from measured values, and instructions for
running emission tests using portable measurement devices outside the
laboratory. This action is needed because EPA has historically drafted
a full set of testing specifications for each vehicle or engine
category subject to emission standards as each program was developed
over the past three decades. This patchwork approach has led to some
variation in test parameters across programs, which we hope to address
by adopting a common set of test requirements. The primary goal of this
effort is to create unified testing requirements for all engines, which
when implemented will streamline laboratory efforts for EPA and
industry. This action will also include other technical changes
intended to clarify and better define requirements, which in some cases
will increase manufacturers' flexibility and decrease burden.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Final Action 07/00/05
[[Page 38206]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4883.
Agency Contact: Glenn Passavant, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4408
Email: passavant.glenn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM35
_______________________________________________________________________
3133. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS: MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The final rule was published on November 10, 2003. Several
parties petitioned the rule and this action will address issues raised
by the petitioners.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4891.
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5402
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM43
_______________________________________________________________________
3134. FLEXIBLE AIR PERMIT RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act title V
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is conducting a flexible permits rulemaking based on what
it has learned from its experiences with flexible permitting over the
past decade. The term ``flexible permit'' is used to describe air
permits with conditions designed to reduce the administrative
``friction''--costs, time, delay, uncertainty, and risk--experienced by
sources and permitting authorities when implementing a permit or making
changes under the permit. This is accomplished by allowing a source to
make certain types of advanced approved changes (e.g., modifications to
a source's method of operation, equipment, raw materials, emission
factors, monitoring parameters, and/or the addition of new equipment
capacity) without requiring additional permitting or approval, provided
the source meets certain criteria outlined in its operating and
relevant construction permits. Such criteria might include the
maintenance of plant-wide emissions levels below enforceable caps and
application of certain control approaches. Over thepast decade, the EPA
and State and local permitting authorities have piloted specific
permitting techniques and tools to accomplish advance-approval for
certain types of changes that might take place over the course of a
permit term. While chosen solutions will depend on individual State
permitting rules and requirements, such techniques typically include:
descriptions of advance-approved changes or categories of changes in
the permit; procedures for testing pollution control device
performanceand updating emission factors or parameter values without
requiring the permit to be amended or reopened; elimination of
redundant requirements by applying the most stringent applicable
requirement; provisions to explicitly encourage pollution prevention;
and one or more emission caps to safeguard relevant ambient standards
and increments.
Flexible permitting has the potential to benefit a wide variety of
types of facilities that are regulated under the Clean Air Act's title
V operating permits program. Among the benefits flexible permits are
anticipated to provide are: improved knowledge of a facility's
emissions for the entire site and of its compliance status; improved
public understanding of a facility's activities over an extended
period, (each proposed advance approval must describe the type and
magnitude of the potential emissions increases that can occur); a
better perspective of the type and amount of planned growth at a
facility, at a time when public comment can influence the direction of
the proposed changes; increased environmental protection from the use
of emission caps, which limit future emissions increases and, in some
cases, reduce overall emissions; and increased use of better add-on
control devices and/or pollution prevention practices, which allow
industry flexibility to adjust their processes as necessary to remain
under an emissions cap.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4885.
Agency Contact: Chad Carbone, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1807 T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2178
Fax: 202 566-2211
Email: carbone.chad@epamail.epa.gov
Anna Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6103A,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-1664
Fax: 202 564-1554
Email: wood.anna@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM45
_______________________________________________________________________
3135. NATIONAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59 subpart D
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would amend the national volatile organic
compound emission standards for architectural coatings by adding new
coating categories for certain coating chemistries which did not exist
when the original rule was promulgated. We are reviewing new data from
one architectural coating manufacturer and
[[Page 38207]]
after this review, we will determine if these amendments are necessary.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4905.
Agency Contact: David Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epa.gov
Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM47
_______________________________________________________________________
3136. CONTROL OF ULTRA LOW SULFUR DIESEL FUEL
LUBRICITY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action proposes to establish a new lubricity quality
requirement for ultra low sulfur diesel fuel used in diesel engines.
This requirement will seek to eliminate the incidence of emissions non-
compliance due to premature wear of fuel injection equipment caused by
inadequate fuel lubricity levels.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
FRM 12/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4899.
Agency Contact: Chris Laroo, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4937
Fax: 734 214-4055
Email: laroo.chris@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM48
_______________________________________________________________________
3137. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE; REFRIGERANT
RECYCLING; CERTIFICATION OF RECOVERY AND RECOVERY/RECYCLING EQUIPMENT
INTENDED FOR USE WITH SUBSTITUTE REFRIGERANTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act
CFR Citation: None
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is amending the rule on refrigerant recycling equipment
intended for use with Substitute Refrigerants: EPA is amending the rule
on refrigerant recycling, promulgated under section 608 of the Clean
Air Act, to clarify how the requirements of section 608 extend to
refrigerant recovery and/or recycling equipment intended for use with
substitutes for CFC and HCFC refrigerants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4916.
Agency Contact: Nancy Smagin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9126
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: smagin.nancy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM49
_______________________________________________________________________
3138. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ALLOCATION
OF ESSENTIAL USE ALLOWANCES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2005
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.4(n)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will allocate essential use allowance for import
and production of class I stratospheric ozone depleting substances
(ODSs) for calendar year 2005. Essential use allowances enable a person
to obtain controlled class I ODSs as an exemption to the regulatory ban
on production and import of these chemicals, which became effective on
January 1, 1996. EPA allocates essential use allowances for exempted
production or import of a specific quantity of class I ODSs solely for
use in medically essential asthma inhalers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4893.
Agency Contact: Scott Monroe, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9712
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: monroe.scott@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM50
_______________________________________________________________________
3139. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE:
MODIFICATIONS TO THE TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION
608 OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414, 7601, 7671 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is amending appendix D to subpart F of 40 CFR part 82-
Standards for Becoming a Certifying Program for Technicians. The
Refrigerant Recycling Regulations governing standards for certifying
programs for technicians were promulgated under section 608 of the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (May 1994; 59 FR 28660). These
regulations were amended in November 9, 1994 (59 FR 559120) to clarify
the scope of the technician certification requirements and to provide a
limited exemption from certification requirements for apprentices. Today's
[[Page 38208]]
amendment to the regulation will provide specific requirements for
programs applying to become certifying organizations, will specify
reporting and recordkeeping requirements in order to enhance
implementation of the program, and will define other administrative
components of the program to improve accountability.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/05
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4901.
Agency Contact: Nancy Smagin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9126
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: smagin.nancy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM55
_______________________________________________________________________
3140. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: EXTENSION OF
THE LABORATORY AND ANALYTICAL USE EXEMPTION FOR ESSENTIAL CLASS I OZONE
DEPLETING SUBSTANCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule extends the period of applicability of an existing
exemption to the ban on import and production of class I ozone
depleting substances (ODSs), authorized by the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and consistent with the Clean
Air Act Amendments. The exemption applies to production and import of
ODSs for essential laboratory and analytical uses as defined by the
Montreal Protocol. The Montreal Protocol has permitted this exemption
since 1994. At the 2003 Meeting of the Parties, the Parties took
Decision XV/8, which extended the period of the exemption through
December 31, 2007. EPA is updating its regulations to incorporate
Decision XV/8. The rule also proposes to make typographical changes to
its regulations for the essential use program. Earlier rules published
by EPA shifted the paragraph order but did not update all of the
references to deleted paragraphs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4894.
Agency Contact: Scott Monroe, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9712
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: monroe.scott@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM56
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3141. SOURCE-SPECIFIC FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR NAVAJO GENERATING
STATION; NAVAJO NATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 49 CFR 123
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA proposes to federalize standards from the Arizona and New
Mexico State Implementation Plans (SIPS) applicable to the Navajo
generating station. Where necessary, EPA's proposed emission standards
modify the standards extracted from the States' regulatory programs to
ensure comprehensive emission control and Federal consistency.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/08/99 64 FR 48725
Notice 01/26/00 65 FR 4244
Reproposal 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4315. Formerly listed as RIN 2060-AI79
Agency Contact: Doug McDaniel, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office San Francisco, AIR5, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 415-947-4106
Fax: 415-947-3579
Email: mcdaniel.doug@epamail.epa.gov
Colleen McKaughan, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office San
Francisco, AIR1, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 520-498-0118
Fax: 520-498-1333
Email: mckaughan.colleen@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2009-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________
3142. SOURCE-SPECIFIC FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR NAVAJO GENERATING
STATION; FOUR CORNERS POWER PLANT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 1740
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA proposes to federalize standards from the Arizona and New
Mexico State Implementation Plans (SIPS) applicable to the Four Corners
Plant, respectively. Where necessary, EPA's proposed emission standards
modify the standards extracted from the States' regulatory programs to
ensure comprehensive emission control and Federal consistency.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/08/99 64 FR 48731
Reproposal 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
[[Page 38209]]
Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3569. NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/
EPA-AIR/1999/September/Day-08/a23277.htm. Formerly listed as RIN
2060-AF42
Agency Contact: Doug McDaniel, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office San Francisco, AIR5, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 415-947-4106
Fax: 415-947-3579
Email: mcdaniel.doug@epamail.epa.gov
Colleen McKaughan, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office San
Francisco, AIR1, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 520-498-0118
Fax: 520-498-1333
Email: mckaughan.colleen@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2009-AA01
_______________________________________________________________________
3143. AMENDMENT TO SUBPARTS H AND I FOR EMISSIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES OTHER
THAN RADON FROM DOE FACILITIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: PL 95-95; ``CAAA 112(g) or (q)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Subparts H and I of 40 CFR Part 61 establish standards under
the Clean Air Act for emissions of radionuclides other than radon from
Department of Energy (DOE) and other non-DOE federal facilities. Under
subparts H and I, regulated entities currently determine compliance
with the emission standards by utilizing the approved computer models
CAP88 and AIRDOS-PC or any other procedures for which EPA has granted
prior approval. Since promulgation of Subparts H and I, EPA has
developed an additional model, GENII-NESHAPS, which is suitable for
regulated entities to use to determine compliance, in addition to the
currently-approved models mentioned above. The model was developed to
incorporate the internal dosimetry models recommended by the
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the
radiological risk estimating procedures of Federal Guidance Report 13
into updated versions of existing environmental pathway analysis
models. The model was developed under the direction of OAR's Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air, in consultation with OAR's Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). Also, GENII-NESHAPs has
undergone Science Advisory Board (SAB) review. In this direct final
rule, EPA is updating Subparts H and I to include GENII-NESHAPS as an
approved compliance model.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 4768.
Agency Contact: Eleanord Thornton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9773
Fax: 202 343-2065
Email: thornton.eleanord@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK81
_______________________________________________________________________
3144. REVISION TO THE GUIDELINE ON AIR QUALITY MODELS (APPENDIX W TO 40
CFR PART 51): ADOPTION OF A PREFERRED GENERAL PURPOSE (FLAT AND COMPLEX
TERRAIN) DISPERSION MODEL AND OTHER REVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410 ``CAAA 110(a)(2)''; ``CAAA 165(e)'';
``CAAA 172(a)''; ``CAAA 172(c)''; 42 USC 7601 ``CAAA 301(a)(1)'';
``CAAA 320''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.112; 40 CFR 51.160; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would revise the Guideline on Air Quality Models,
published as appendix W to 40 CFR part 51. The Guideline provides EPA-
recommended models for use in predicting ambient concentrations of
pollutants for programs ranging from Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) to State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for
controlling air pollution sources. The Guideline fulfills a Clean Air
Act mandate for EPA to specify models for air management purposes. This
revision would enhance the Guideline by incorporating a new, general-
purpose dispersion model called AERMOD, which would replace the
existing Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) model in many air-quality
assessments, including those involving complex terrain. An earlier
version of the AERMOD revision was previously proposed (65 FR 21505, 4/
21/2000; see SAN 3470), but not promulgated. We are re-proposing it to
reflect changes made in response to public comment we received on the
April 2000 proposal.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/21/00 65 FR 21505
Notice of Data Availability 09/08/03 68 FR 52934
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3470.1.
Split from RIN 2060-AF01.
Agency Contact: Tom Coulter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C302-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-0832
Email: coulter.tom@epamail.epa.gov
Mark Evangelista, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2803
Email: evangelista.mark@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK60
_______________________________________________________________________
3145. NESHAP: RECIPROCATING INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 ``CAA 112''; PL 101-549
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000, -.
Final, Judicial, February 27, 2004, consent decree.
[[Page 38210]]
Abstract: The stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine
source category is listed as a major source of hazardous air pollutants
(HAPs) under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). A major source is
one which emits more than 10 tons/yr of one HAP or more than 25 tons/yr
of a combination of 189 HAPs. The reciprocating internal combustion
engine (RICE) MACT was published in the Federal Register on December
19, 2002. A public hearing was held on January 21, 2003 and the public
comment period closed on February 18, 2003. Comments and data received
during the comment period are being evaluated. The anticipated date of
the final RICE rule being signed by the Administrator is February 27,
2004.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/19/02 67 FR 77830
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 3656.
Agency Contact: Sims Roy, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5263
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: roy.sims@epamail.epa.gov
RobertJ Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG63
_______________________________________________________________________
3146. NESHAP: INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BOILERS AND
PROCESS HEATERS
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000, -.
Final, Judicial, February 27, 2004, consent decree.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, requires EPA to
develop emission standards for sources of hazardous air pollutants
(HAPs). Industrial boilers, institutional/commercial boilers and
process heaters are among the potential source categories to be
regulated under section 112 of the CAA. Emissions of HAPs will be
addressed by this rulemaking for both new and existing sources. EPA
promulgated an NSPS for these source categories in 1987 and 1990. The
standards for the NESHAP are to be technology-based and are to require
the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) as described in
section 112 of the CAA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/13/03 68 FR 1660
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 3837.
Agency Contact: Jim Eddinger, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5426
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: eddinger.jim@epamail.epa.gov
Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG69
_______________________________________________________________________
3147. PROT. OF STRAT. OZONE: UPDATE OF THE SUBSTITUTES LIST UNDER (SNAP)
PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671(k) ``CAA 612''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82; 40 CFR 9
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 612 of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to identify
alternatives to Class I and II ozone depleting substances and to
publish lists of acceptable and unacceptable substitutes. Producers of
substitutes must notify EPA at least 90 days before alternatives are
introduced into interstate commerce. Unlike acceptable alternatives
(see Notices), substitutes which are deemed by EPA to be unacceptable
or acceptable subject to use restrictions must go through notice and
comment rulemaking. Substitute lists are updated intermittently
depending on the volume of notifications.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 01/16/92 57 FR 1984
NPRM 05/12/93 58 FR 28094
Final 03/18/94 59 FR 13044
Notice 1 08/26/94 59 FR 44240
NPRM 1 09/26/94 59 FR 49108
Notice 2 01/13/95 60 FR 3318
Final 1 06/13/95 60 FR 31092
Notice 3 07/28/95 60 FR 38729
Notice of Prop Settlement 09/22/95 60 FR 49275
Notice: Denial 1 09/25/95 60 FR 49407
NPRM 2 10/02/95 60 FR 51383
Notice 4 02/08/96 61 FR 4736
Final 2 05/22/96 61 FR 25585
NPRM 3 05/22/96 61 FR 25604
Notice: Denial 2 09/03/96 61 FR 51018
Notice 5 09/05/96 61 FR 47012
Final 3 10/16/96 61 FR 54030
Notice 6 03/10/97 62 FR 10700
NPRM 4 05/21/97 62 FR 27874
Notice 7 06/03/97 62 FR 30275
NPRM 5 02/03/98 63 FR 5491
Notice 8 02/24/98 63 FR 9151
Notice 9 05/22/98 63 FR 28251
Notice: denial 3 01/21/99 64 FR 3272
Interim Final 7 01/26/99 64 FR 3861
Interim Final 8 01/26/99 64 FR 3865
ANPRM 12 02/18/99 64 FR 8043
NPRM 6 02/18/99 64 FR 8038
Final 5 03/03/99 64 FR 10373
ANPRM 12: Correct. 03/25/99 64 FR 14417
NPRM 6: Correct 03/25/99 64 FR 14417
Final 4 04/28/99 64 FR 22981
Notice 10 06/08/99 64 FR 30410
Notice 11 12/06/99 64 FR 68039
Notice 12 04/11/00 65 FR 19327
Final 6 04/26/00 65 FR 24387
Notice 13 06/19/00 65 FR 37900
NPRM 10 Foams 07/11/00 65 FR 42653
Notice 14 12/18/00 65 FR 78977
Correction Notice 14 03/07/01 66 FR 13655
NODA rule 10 foams 05/23/01 66 FR 28408
Notic 15 05/23/01 66 FR 28179
NPRM 9 Rescind Rule 01/29/02 67 FR 4222
Notice 16 03/22/02 67 FR 13272
Final 10 Foams 07/22/02 67 FR 47703
Notice 17 12/20/02 67 FR 77927
Notice 17 Corr 04/07/03 68 FR 16728
[[Page 38211]]
Notice 18 08/21/03 68 FR 50533
NODA for rule 10 Foams (HCFC-
141b) 03/10/04 69 FR 11358
Final 10 Foams (HCFC-141b) 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3525.
Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9163
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: sheppard.margaret@epamail.epa.gov
Jeff Cohen, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9005
Fax: 202-565-2095
Email: cohen.jeff@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG12
_______________________________________________________________________
3148. AIR QUALITY: REVISION TO DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
- EXCLUSION OF 4 COMPOUNDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7407(d)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This is a deregulatory action to exclude four compounds from
the list of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the basis that these
compounds make a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone
formation. These four compounds are: 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-
methoxy-propane (n-C3F7OCH3; 3-ethoxy-,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-
dodecafluoro-2- (trifluoromethyl) hexane (known as HFE-7500, HFE-s702,
T-7145, and L-15381); 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (known as HFC
227ea); and methyl formate (HCOOCH3). These compounds have potential
for use as refrigerants, fire suppressants, aerosol propellants,
sterilants, blowing agents (used in the manufacture of foamed plastic),
and solvents. This action will remove the necessity to control these
four compounds as VOCs in State Implementation Plans for attaining the
ozone standard.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/03/03 68 FR 52373
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4683.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Dave Sanders, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3356
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: sanders.dave@epamail.epa.gov
William L. Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5245
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: johnson.williaml@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK37
_______________________________________________________________________
3149. METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS--ADDITION OF METHODS
203A, 203B, AND 203C TO APPENDIX M OF PART 51
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401(b)(1); 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7470 to 7479;
42 USC 7501 to 7508; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking adds Test Methods 203A, 203B, and 203C to 40
CFR part 51, appendix M (entitled Example Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans). These methods describe procedures for estimating
the opacity of visible emissions. States have requested that EPA
promulgate these methods so that they can use them in State
Implementation Plans in enforcing visible emissions regulations from
Stationary Sources.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/22/93 58 FR 61639
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 2915.
Agency Contact: Solomon Ricks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5242
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: ricks.solomon@epamail.epa.gov
Fred Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2707
Email: thompson.fred@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF83
_______________________________________________________________________
3150. ADDITION OF METHOD 207 TO APPENDIX M OF 40 CFR PART 51 METHOD FOR
MEASURING ISOCYANATES IN STATIONARY SOURCE EMISSIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 listed certain
isocyanate compounds as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The Agency
does not have any published test methods that would measure air
emissions of these isocyanate compounds from stationary sources. This
action would add a validated test method to measure isocyanate
emissions to appendix M of part 51. Test methods in part 51 can be
adopted by any State for use in any regulation that requires the
measurement of any of the isocyanate compounds on the HAP list. This
action would not impose any new regulatory requirements that do not
already exist. It should benefit State governments by providing them
with a validated test procedure for measuring the emissions of
isocyanate compounds.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/08/97 62 FR 64532
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
[[Page 38212]]
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3900.
Agency Contact: Gary McAlister, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-1062
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: mcalister.gary@epamail.epa.gov
Fred Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2707
Email: thompson.fred@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG88
_______________________________________________________________________
3151. CLEAN AIR OZONE IMPLEMENTATION RULE (PART 1 AND 2)
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7501-7511f; 42 USC
7601(a)(1)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50; 40 CFR 81
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule would provide specific requirements for State and
local air pollution control agencies and Tribes to prepare State
implementation plans (SIPs) and Tribal Implementation Plans (TIPs)
under the 8-hour national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for
ozone, published by EPA on July 18, 1997. The Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires EPA to set ambient air quality standards and requires States
to submit SIPs to implement those standards. The 1997 standards were
challenged in court, but in February 2001, the Supreme Court determined
that EPA has authority to implement a revised ozone standard, but ruled
that EPA must reconsider its implementation plan for moving from the 1-
hour standard to the revised standard. The Supreme Court identified
conflicts between different parts of the CAA related to implementation
of a revised NAAQS, provided some direction to EPA for resolving the
conflicts, and left it to EPA to develop a reasonable approach for
implementation. Thus, this rulemaking must address the requirements of
the CAA and the Supreme Court's ruling. This rule would provide
detailed provisions to address the CAA requirements for SIPs and TIPs
and would thus affect States and Tribes. States with areas that are not
attaining the 8-hour ozone NAAQS will have to develop -- as part of
their SIPs -- emission limits and other requirements to attain the
NAAQS within the timeframes set forth in the CAA. Tribal lands that are
not attaining the 8-hour ozone standard may be affected, and could
voluntarily submit a TIP, but would not be required to submit a TIP. In
cases where a TIP is not submitted, EPA would have the responsibility
for planning in those areas.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/02/03 68 FR 32802
Final Action (Phase 1) 04/30/04 69 FR 23951
Final Action (Phase 2) 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4625.
Agency Contact: John Silvasi, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5666
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: silvasi.john@epamail.epa.gov
Denise Gerth, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5550
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: gerth.denise@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ99
_______________________________________________________________________
3152. AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES;
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (40 CFR PART 60, APPENDIX F, PROCEDURE 3)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 15, 2001, -.
Abstract: This rulemaking proposes to add a method, Method 203, for the
measurement of opacity from stationary sources, to appendix M (Example
Test Methods for State Implementation Plans) in 40 CFR part 51. This
action provides States with an instrumental test method which can be
used in determining, on a continuous basis, compliance with stationary
source opacity emission limitations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/07/92 57 FR 46114
Supplemental NPRM 05/08/03 68 FR 24692
Final Action 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3958.
Agency Contact: Solomon Ricks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5242
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: ricks.solomon@epamail.epa.gov
Fred Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2707
Email: thompson.fred@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH23
_______________________________________________________________________
3153. ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE NSPS AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.270 to 60.276a
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Sources affected by the NSPS for electric arc furnaces
(Subparts AA, and AAa) have expressed concerns with the requirements in
the NSPS to use a continuous opacity monitor (COM) to monitor opacity
and report periods when the COM indicated greater than 3 percent
opacity as periods of excess emissions, and have petitioned the EPA to
reconsider the COM requirements. These concerns arise from recent
information that indicate that COM readings may have an error of up to
4 percent, which in itself isgreater than the 3 percent excess
emissions threshold. The EPA is reconsidering the COM requirements, and
may amend the NSPS to add alternative monitoring requirements.
[[Page 38213]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/16/02 67 FR 64014
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4555.
Agency Contact: Kevin Cavender, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-2364
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: cavender.kevin@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ68
_______________________________________________________________________
3154. REVISION OF COMBUSTION TURBINES NSPS--PART 60, SUBPART GG
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The NSPS for Combustion Turbines has not been revised since
1980. Revisions are needed to reduce the burden on EPA and State/Local
agencies, of approving, on a case by case basis, alternate testing and
monitoring protocols due to advances in emission control technologies.
The revisions are also intended to bring consistency between the
monitoring and testing requirements in the Combustion Turbines NSPS
(Part 60) and the Acid Rain Program (Part 75) so that the same data can
be used to comply with both regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 04/14/03 68 FR 18003
DF Withdrawn 05/28/03 68 FR 31611
Final Action Amendments 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Local, State
Additional Information: SAN 4681.
Sectors Affected: 211111 Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction;
2211 Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution; 211112
Natural Gas Liquid Extraction; 221 Utilities
Agency Contact: Jaime Pagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5340
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: pagan.jaime@epamail.epa.gov
Sims Roy, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-01,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5263
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: roy.sims@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK35
_______________________________________________________________________
3155. UPDATE OF CONTINUOUS INSTRUMENTAL TEST METHODS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411
CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 60
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, and 20 of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A
are instrumental methods that are being revised to make their
performance criteria consistent. Analyzer calibration error tests and
sampling system bias tests now required in Methods 3A, 6C, and 7E are
being added to Methods 10 and 20. Inconsistent acceptance criteria for
other performance tests and calibration gas quality are also being made
uniform. Performance criteria currently determined based on the
instrument span is being revised to an emission limit basis. This
change will fix the acceptance limits for all source tests on the
applicable emission limit and not on a span value that sources have
some discretion in choosing. These revisions were proposed on August
27, 1997 in an announcement entitled ``Amendments for Testing and
Monitoring Provisions.'' They were considered not significant at that
time. The public did not feel that the preamble to the rule provided
adequate notice of the changes being made to themethods. The commenters
requested a reproposal of these revision to the instrumental methods to
allow for adequate public review. Methods 7F and 7G are new methods
that measure nitrogen oxides electrochemically. These methods are being
proposed in response to requests made by vendors/sources. These methods
will add flexibility to the testing provisions currently in place and
will not add requirements or affect the stringency of the underlying
emission standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/10/03 68 FR 58838
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4161.
Agency Contact: Foston Curtis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1806A, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-1063
Fax: 202-564-7299
Email: curtis.foston@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK61
_______________________________________________________________________
3156. NESHAP: PLYWOOD AND COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(d)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 2000, -.
Final, Judicial, February 27, 2004, consent decree.
Abstract: This project is to develop national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) by establishing maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) for facilities manufacturing wood panels and
engineered wood products. MACT standards are under development to
reduce the release of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from all
industries to protect the public health and environment. Emissions of
HAP from this industry have been associated with, but are not limited
to, the drying of wood and binders. This rule is anticipated to apply
to the manufacture of products involving wood and some
[[Page 38214]]
kind of binder or bonding agent. This project may include, but is not
limited to, facilities that manufacture hardboard, oriented strandboard
(OSB), medium density fiberboard (MDF), particleboard, hardwood and
softwood plywood, glue-laminated lumber, laminated veneer lumber, and
engineered wood products. The source category may also include lumber
drying kilns at sawmills. The project may also include some coatings
operations. The name of the source category was formerly Plywood and
Particleboard MACT.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/09/03 68 FR 1276
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3820.
Sectors Affected: 32121 Veneer, Plywood, and Engineered Wood Product
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mary Kissell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-4516
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: kissell.mary@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG52
_______________________________________________________________________
3157. NESHAP: CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This final amendment will also allow hard chromium
electroplating facilities using fume suppressants for emission control
to meet a surface tension limit similar to the requirements for
decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing facilities
instead of the present requirement to meet an emission limit.
Facilities choosing to use fume suppressants for emission control would
be required to monitor the surface tension at the same frequency
currently required for decorative chromium and chromium anodizing tanks
and demonstrate compliance with the surface tension operating limit.
Like decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing
facilities, hard chromium electroplating facilities would now be
allowed to monitor surface tension to demonstrate compliance in lieu of
performance testing.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/05/02 67 FR 38810
Final Rule Amendments 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4115.
Sectors Affected: 332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing
and Coloring
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH69
_______________________________________________________________________
3158. NESHAP: ASPHALT/COAL TAR APPLICATION ON METAL PIPES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, November 15, 2000, -.
Abstract: The Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended in 1990, requires the EPA
to (1) publish an initial list of all categories of major and area
sources of the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in section 112(b)
of the CAA, (2) promulgate a schedule establishing a date for the
promulgation of emission standards for each of the listed categories of
HAPs emission sources, and (3) develop emission standards for each
source of HAPs. These standards are to be technology-based and are to
require the maximum degree of emission reduction determined to be
achievable by the Administrator. The Agency has determined that the
application of asphalt or coal tar to metal pipes may reasonably be
anticipated to emit several of the 189 HAPs listed in section 112(b) of
the CAA. As a consequence, a regulatory development program is being
pursued for the asphalt/coal tar application on metal pipes industry to
promulgate emission standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/13/02 67 FR 52780
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4107. This action will be covered under
Misc. Metal Parts & Products, SAN 3825, RIN 2060-AG56
Sectors Affected: 332812 Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and
Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers
Agency Contact: Kim Teal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5580
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: teal.kim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH78
_______________________________________________________________________
3159. PETITIONS TO DELIST HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: MEK
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: ``Clean Air Act Section 112(b)(3)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, February 28, 2000.
Abstract: The Agency has received a petition to remove methyl ethyl
ketone (MEK) from the list of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) under
Section 112(b)
[[Page 38215]]
of the Clean Air Act. The Agency must review the petitions and either
grant or deny the petition within 18 months of the date the complete
petition was received. If the Agency grants a petition, a notice of
proposed rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register, allowing
the opportunity for public comment. If the Agency denies a petition, a
notice of denial will be published in the Federal Register providing an
explanation for such denial. If the Agency grants a petition and
ultimately removes the pollutant from the HAP list then sources
emitting such pollutants would not be required to meet MACT emissions
standards for the pollutant. If on the other hand, the Agency denies
the petition, then MACT standards would be issued as currently planned
under Section 112(c) and 112(d) of the Clean Air Act for sources
emitting such pollutants. Depending on the 4 individual determinations,
the Agency will issue separate notices for each.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/30/03 68 FR 32606
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4313.
Agency Contact: Kelly Rimer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2962
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: rimer.kelly@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI72
_______________________________________________________________________
3160. ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM GENERATING UNIT MACT REGULATION
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, December 15, 2003, -.
Final, Judicial, December 15, 2004, -.
Abstract: On January 30, 2004, the EPA proposed alternative approaches
to regulating mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility steam
generating units and nickel emissions from oil-fired electric utility
steam generating units.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/30/04 69 FR 4754
Supplemental NPRM 03/16/04 69 FR 12298
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4571.
Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation
Agency Contact: RobertJ Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ65
_______________________________________________________________________
3161. NESHAP: SOLVENT EXTRACTION FOR VEGETABLE OIL: AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On April 12, 2001, EPA promulgated National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for solvent extraction
of vegetable oil. This amendment will consider adjustments to that
NESHAP in light of information gained since its promulgation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4672. Split from RIN 2060-AH22.
Sectors Affected: 311225 Fats and Oils Refining and Blending; 311223
Other Oilseed Processing; 311222 Soybean Processing
Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3078
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: nizich.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK32
_______________________________________________________________________
3162. NESHAP: HAZARDOUS ORGANIC NESHAP (HON) AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 ``CAA 112''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action proposes to amend the Hazardous Organic NESHAP to
allow vapor balancing as a control option for storage vessels.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4712.
Agency Contact: Mark Morris, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5416
[[Page 38216]]
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: morris.mark@epamail.epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK49
_______________________________________________________________________
3163. NESHAP FOR PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLANTS; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The NESHAP for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants was
promulgated in 1997 (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LL). The amendments
described here would revise the emission limit for polycyclic organic
matter applicable to one subcategory of source based on newly available
data more representative of performance from the top five performing
sources. The proposed amendments would also clarify language on
compliance dates and add specific provisions for startup of new or
reconstructed affected sources and affected sources that restart after
being idled for long periods of time. More time would be allowed due to
the nature of the process operation, depending on the type of source.
No additional costs or information collection requirements would be
incurred as a result of the amendments. There also are no significant
policy issues. State agency and industry representatives concur with
the changes, which will improve implementation of the 1997 rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/17/03 68 FR 12645
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4713.
Agency Contact: Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK50
_______________________________________________________________________
3164. NESHAP FOR PETROLEUM REFINERIES: CATALYTIC CRACKING UNITS,
CATALYTIC REFORMING UNITS, AND SULFUR RECOVERY UNITS; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The NESHAP for Petroleum Refineries is an existing rulemaking
(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUU) to control hazardous air pollutant
emissions from equipment in the petroleum refining industry. This
rulemaking will amend the Petroleum Refinery NESHAP to incorporate
additional compliance options for catalytic reforming units at
refineries. Clarifying language and missing tables will also be added.
This action will not increase costs or change the emission reductions
expected for this rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4714.
Agency Contact: Bob Lucas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0884
Fax: 919-541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK51
_______________________________________________________________________
3165. NESHAP: GENERAL PROVISIONS; AMENDMENTS FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION
ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.2; 40 CFR 63.17
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: We are proposing amendments to the Part 63 General Provisions
that would allow facilities that are subject to a maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) Subpart to discontinue unnecessary
requirements if, through pollution prevention measures, they achieve
and can demonstrate continued hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emission
reductions equivalent to or better than the MACT level of control. We
are proposing these amendments to encourage and promote pollution
prevention, which is our strategyof first choice in reducing HAP
emissions. We expect these amendments to result in no additional burden
for sources and air pollution control agencies. This effort is the
product of discussions with State and local air pollution control
officials. There also are no significant policy issues.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Proposed Amdmt 05/15/03 68 FR 26249
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4719.
Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5262
Email: colyer.rick@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK54
[[Page 38217]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3166. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR
STATIONARY COMBUSTION TURBINES--PETITION TO DELIST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, 12 months from the date of the
receipt of the last information completing the petition.
Abstract: The Agency has received a petition to remove the Gas Turbines
source category from the list of hazardous air pollutant sources under
Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act. The Agency must review the
petition and either grant or deny the petition within 12 months of the
date the complete petition is received. If the Agency grants the
petition, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the FR,
allowing the opportunity for public comment. If the Agency denies the
petition, a notice of denial will be published in the FR providing an
explanation of the denial.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM -- Delisting 04/07/04 69 FR 18338
NPRM-Stay 04/07/04 69 FR 18327
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4751.
Sectors Affected: 3336 Engine, Turbine, and Power Transmission
Equipment Manufacturing; 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Kelly Rimer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2962
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: rimer.kelly@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK73
_______________________________________________________________________
3167. NESHAP: ETHYLENE PROCESSES; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subparts XX and YY
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Ethylene Production NESHAP was promulgated on Friday,
July 12, 2002 (67 FR 46258) without petition for judicial review.
However, we did receive a letter from the affected industry association
requesting that we consider certain technical corrections. Following
review of this request, we believe some changes to the final rule are
necessary for clarity and consistency. This correction requires an
action in the form of a direct final rule which will contain rule
changes, technical amendments and clarifications.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4763.
Agency Contact: Warren Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5124
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: johnson.warren@epamail.epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK80
_______________________________________________________________________
3168. RULEMAKING ON SECTION 126 PETITIONS FROM NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT
REGARDING SOURCES IN MICHIGAN; REVISION OF DEFINITION OF APPLICABLE
REQUIREMENT FOR TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 75; 40 CFR 97
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The EPA is proposing to revise the Section 126 Rule in light
of the March 3, 2000 court decision on the NOx SIP Call. The court
vacated, and remanded to EPA for further consideration, the inclusion
of Georgia and Missouri in the NOx SIP Call in light of the Ozone
Transport Assessment Group conclusions that emissions from coarse grid
portions of States did not merit controls. The reasoning of the Court
regarding the significance of NOx emissions from sources in Georgia and
Missouri calls into question the inclusion of the coarse grid portion
of Michigan in the NOx SIP Call. In a separate proposal, EPA is
proposing to withdraw the NOx SIP Call requirements for the Michigan
coarse grid area. The Section 126 Rule is based on many of the same
analyses and information used for the NOx SIP call and covers part of
Michigan. Thus, EPA is proposing to withdraw its section 126 findings
and control requirements with respect to sources located in the small
part of the coarse grid portion of Michigan that is currently covered
by the Section 126 Rule. The EPA has not identified any existing
section 126 sources that would be affected by the proposal, however
this proposal would eliminate findings and control requirements for new
sources locating in the coarse grid. This proposal does not create any
new requirements, thus there are no associated costs. The EPA is also
proposing to revise the definition ``applicable requirement'' for title
V operating permit programs by providing expressly thatany standard or
other requirement under section 126 is an applicable requirement and
must be included in operating permits issued under title V of the CAA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/22/02 67 FR 8386
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4464. Split from RIN 2060-AH88.
Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
[[Page 38218]]
and Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Helms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-02,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5527
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: helms.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ36
_______________________________________________________________________
3169. SECTION 126 RULE WITHDRAWAL PROVISION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing to revise one narrow aspect of the Section
126 Rule, which was promulgated January 18, 2000. The rule requires
certain sources located in the eastern United States to reduce their
NOx emissions for purposes of reducing ozone transport. EPA coordinated
the Section 126 Rule with a related ozone transport rule, known as the
NOx State implementation plan call (NOx SIP Call), which also addresses
ozone transport in the eastern United States. The EPA established the
same compliance date for both rules, May 1, 2003. The EPA included a
provision in the Section 126 Rule which provided that where a State
adopted, and EPA approved, a SIP controlling transport under the NOx
SIP Call, and with a May 1, 2003 compliance date, EPA would withdraw
the Section 126 requirements for sources in that State. This was a
practical way to address the overlap between the two rules and avoid
having sources be subject to two sets of potentially different NOx
transport control requirements.As the result of court actions, the
compliance dates for the Section 126 Rule and the NOx SIP Call have
both been delayed until May 31, 2004. In addition, the NOx SIP Call has
been divided into two phases. Therefore, it is necessary to revise the
Section 126 Rule withdrawal provision so that it will continue to
operate under these new circumstances.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/04/03 68 FR 16644
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4689.
Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov
Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: grano.doug@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK41
_______________________________________________________________________
3170. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY AMENDMENTS: RESPONSE TO MARCH 2, 1999,
COURT DECISION
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 93
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to promulgate rules that
establish the criteria and procedures for determining whether highway
and transit plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality
plans. Conformity means that the transportation actions will not cause
or worsen violations of air quality standards or delay timely
attainment of the standards. The original conformity rule was finalized
on November 24, 1993, and most recently amended on August 15, 1997. On
March 2, 1999, the U.S. Court of Appeals overturned certain provisions
of the 1997 conformity amendments. This rulemaking will amend the
conformity rule in compliance with the court decision. The rulemaking
will formalize the May 14, 1999 EPA guidance and the June 18, 1999 DOT
guidance that was issued to guide action on this issue until a
rulemaking could be issued. Specifically, the rulemaking will clarify
the types of projects that can be implemented in the absence of a
conforming transportation plan. It will also explain EPA's process for
reviewing newly submitted air quality plans and when those submissions
can be used for conformity purposes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/30/03 68 FR 38974
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Local, State
Additional Information: SAN 4340.
Agency Contact: Angela Spickard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 49105
Phone: 734-214-4283
Email: spickard.angela@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI56
_______________________________________________________________________
3171. EXPANDED DEFINITIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE-FUELED VEHICLES AND ENGINES
MEETING LOW-EMISSION VEHICLE EXHAUST EMISSION STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2001; 15 USC 2002; 15 USC 2003; 15 USC 2005; 15
USC 2006; 15 USC 213; 42 USC 7521; 42 USC 7522; 42 USC 7524; 42 USC
7525; 42 USC 7541; 42 USC 7542; 42 USC 7549; 42 USC 7550; 42 USC 7552
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 88
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will ease the burden of certification for both
Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and after-market conversion
entities. This action will, for vehicles and engines meeting LEV
emission standards, broaden the definition of the term dedicated fuel
system, broaden the criteria for engine families, and provide an
exemption from certification fees. This action is not a deregulatory
action. This action will provide another means for small business to
remain active entities in supplying alternatively fueled vehicles to
the market place. The above three changes are intended to reduce the
cost of complying with the requirements of certification, and small
business will benefit from these changes. This action will enhance the
ability for the regulated industry to provide alternatively fueled
vehicles to the consumer in support of the Executive Order 13031.
[[Page 38219]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/20/98 63 FR 38767
Notice 05/14/99 64 FR 26410
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4030.
Agency Contact: Dan Harrison, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4281
Email: harrison.dan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH52
_______________________________________________________________________
3172. MODIFICATION OF THE ANTI-DUMPING BASELINE DATE CUT-OFF LIMIT FOR
DATA USED IN DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL BASELINE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91(b)(1)(i); 40 CFR 80.93(a)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: ``Dumping'' refers to the practice whereby refiners making
clean fuels for certain markets (such as reformulated gasoline for
clean-air purposes) take the pollutants removed from the clean fuels
and ``dump'' them into other fuels they are producing for other
markets. This, if allowed, would make those other fuels even dirtier
than before, and so the Clean Air Act prohibits this practice. EPA has
existing ``anti-dumping'' rules on the books that codify this Clean Air
Act prohibition. This regulation is a minor technical amendment to
those existing regulations. It would amend a portion of those
regulations to allow the use of data collected after January 1, 1995 in
the development of baselines, and it would establish a cut-off date of
January 1, 2002 for the submission of all individual baselines under
the anti-dumping program. This date is the same as that allowed for
foreign refineries seeking a unique individual baseline under the anti-
dumping program.)
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4604.
Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, 20460
Phone: 734-214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: brunner.christine@epamail.epa.gov
Patrice Simms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 202-564-5593
Email: simms.patrice@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ82
_______________________________________________________________________
3173. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NONROAD DIESEL ENGINES
AND FUEL
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2002
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 89
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On May 23, 2003, EPA proposed new emission controls for
nonroad diesel engines, which are generally used in industrial, mining,
and agricultural applications. The control strategies proposed focused
around the use of advanced exhaust aftertreatment technologies for the
first time in these applications. This technology reduces emissions of
NOx, NMHC, and PM of over 90%. The standards would phase-in between
2008 and 2014, with different implementation schedules applicable to
each of the fiveengine horsepower categories. Less stringent standards
would apply to the smallest horsepower category. Coupled with these
proposed engine standards is a two-step reduction in fuel sulfur
levels, going from uncontrolled levels to 500 ppm in 2007 and then to
15 ppm in 2010. All nonroad diesel fuel, including that used in
locomotive and marine applications, is covered in the first step while
locomotive and marine fuel is not involved in the second step. This
overall program builds on the successful 2007 highway diesel program
the Agency completed in 2000.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/23/03 68 FR 28328
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
Additional Information: SAN 4675.
Agency Contact: Cleophas Jackson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, ASD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4824
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: jackson.cleophas@epamail.epa.gov
William Charmley, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
ASD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4466
Fax: 734 214-4050
Email: charmley.william@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK27
_______________________________________________________________________
3174. EMISSIONS DURABILITY PROCEDURES FOR NEW LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES AND
LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On October 22, 2002 the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit vacated durability provisions that
automotive manufacturers used to demonstrate that the emissions of
their vehicles would comply with emission standards for the useful
lives of those vehicles. The Court also required EPA to issue new
regulations. This action fulfills the mandate. The new durability
regulations will include options that a manufacturer may choose from to
age pre-production vehicles to determine the rate of emission
deterioration over the vehicle's useful life. The options
[[Page 38220]]
will include a prescribed fixed driving cycle and a prescribed bench
aging cycle that are used to age prototype vehicles or emission control
components to the equivalent of the useful life period of the vehicle
in a manner that replicates the aging that the vehicle or components
would see in actual use. This rule does not change the federal emission
standards or the test procedures used to quantify emissions. Although
there is no court-ordered deadline, this is a court-ordered action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/02/04 69 FR 17532
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4757.
Sectors Affected: 3361 Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Eldert Bontekoe, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4442
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: bontekoe.eldert@epamail.epa.gov
Linda Hormes, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4502
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: hormes.linda@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK76
_______________________________________________________________________
3175. IMPORTATION OF NONCONFORMING VEHICLES; AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7522 ``CAA 203''; 42 USC 7525 ``CAA 206''; 42
USC 7541 ``CAA 207''; 42 USC 7542 ``CAA 208''; 42 USC 7601 ``CAA 301'';
42 USC 7522 ``CAA 203''; 42 USC 7550 ``CAA 216''; 42 USC 7601 ``CAA 301''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will amend the regulations in 40 CFR part 85,
subpart P to allow entry into the United States of vehicles which are
originally sold in Canada and which are identical to their U.S.
counterparts, without obtaining a certificate of conformity from EPA.
This action is in response to a petition for review of import rules.
The final rule also will address certain other issues in part 85,
subpart P and subpart R, including: (1) formalizing a long-standing EPA
policy regarding the importation of owned vehicles that are proven to
be identical to a vehicle certified for sale in the United States (2)
establishing new emission standards applicable to imported
nonconforming vehicles; (3) clarifying the regulatory language that
concerns exclusions and exemptions from meeting Federal emission
requirements; and (4) providing several minor clarifications to the
existing regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/24/94 59 FR 13912
Supplemental NPRM 02/12/96 61 FR 5840
Final Action 01/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 2665.
Agency Contact: Bob Doyal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6405J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9258
RIN: 2060-AI03
_______________________________________________________________________
3176. REVISIONS TO THE APPEAL PROCEDURES AND THE FEDERAL NOX BUDGET
TRADING PROGRAM, PARTS 78 AND 97
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7651 et seq; 42 USC 7401; 42 USC
7403:; 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 75 (Revision); 40 CFR 97 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule is a set of revisions which will simplify and
streamline the interface between the existing Acid Rain Program and the
NOx Budget Trading Program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/13/01 66 FR 31978
NPRM ECP 07/27/01 66 FR 39123
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4682. Split from RIN 2060-AJ43.
Sectors Affected: 221111 Hydroelectric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Dwight Alpern, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6204N, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9151
Fax: 202-565-2141
Email: alpern.dwight@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK36
_______________________________________________________________________
3177. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR INDIAN RESERVATIONS IN IDAHO,
OREGON AND WASHINGTON
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49.121 to 49.139; 40 CFR 49.9861 to 49.17810
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) proposes basic air
rules to apply on Indian Reservations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
The rules provide some basic air quality protection similar to what the
state implementation plans (SIPs) require for Idaho, Oregon, and
Washington. These rules are needed to establish a level playing field
and create basic federally enforceable rules under the Clean Air Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/15/02 67 FR 11748
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4487. EPA Region 10 would be responsible
for implementing and enforcing these proposed rules. Tribes can choose
to assist EPA or take over responsibility for their reservations, and
EPA would provide funding to tribes through grants to support their
efforts.
Agency Contact: Regina Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency,
[[Page 38221]]
Regional Office Seattle, OAQ-107, Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-553-6379
Fax: 206-553-4672
Email: thompson.regina@epamail.epa.gov
Bonnie Thie, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office Seattle,
OAQ-107, Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-553-1189
Fax: 206 553-0110
Email: thie.bonnie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2012-AA01
_______________________________________________________________________
3178. REVISION TO THE DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC) TO
EXCLUDE TERTIARY BUTYL ACETATE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The definition of VOC is proposed to be revised to add
tertiary butyl acetate to the list of negligibly reactive compounds.
This is a deregulatory action that will remove tertiary butyl acetate
from the necessity to be controlled as a VOC in SIPs for attaining the
ozone standard.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/30/99 64 FR 52731
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4254.
Agency Contact: William Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5245
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: johnson.williaml@epa.gov
Terry Keating, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6103A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-1174
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: keating.terry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI45
_______________________________________________________________________
3179. CLEAN AIR VISIBILITY RULE
Priority: Economically Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7421; 42 USC 7470 to
7479; 42 USC 7491; 42 USC 7492; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7602
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.308(e)(1); 40 CFR 51 app Y (New)
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, April 15, 2004, Consent Decree: April
15, 2004.
Final, Judicial, April 15, 2005, Consent Decree: April 15, 2005.
Abstract: To meet the Clean Air Act's requirements, EPA published the
regional haze rule on July 1, 1999 (64 FR 35714). On May 24, 2002, the
DC Circuit vacated certain provisions of the regional haze rule related
to best available retrofit technology (BART). Because of this court
decision, we need to propose and publish revised BART provisions in the
regional haze rule. The purpose of this effort is to provide the
appropriate changes to the BART requirements and guidelines, and to
address additional issues related to reasonable progress goals for the
visibility program. On July 20, 2001, we proposed guidelines intended
to add further clarifications to the BART requirements in the regional
haze rule. Since then, due to additional information that has come to
light since that proposal, we have decided that a supplemental proposal
is needed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/20/01 66 FR 38108
Supplemental NPRM 05/05/04 69 FR 25184
Final Action 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4450.
Agency Contact: Kathy Kaufman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-0102
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: kaufman.kathy@epamail.epa.gov
Todd Hawes, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5591
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: hawes.todd@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ31
_______________________________________________________________________
3180. CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FROM MOBILE SOURCES: DEFAULT
BASELINE REVISION AND MINOR CORRECTIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, October 31, 2001, 80.855(b)(2)
directs EPA to revise the default baseline by this date.
Abstract: The final rule, Control of Emissions of Hazardous Air
Pollutants From Mobile Sources (66 FR 17230, 3/29/01), directed EPA to
revise the default toxics baselines in the rule to include year 2000
data when it becomes available. When revised, the default toxics
baseline values will be the average toxics values for gasoline over the
period 1998-2000. This data is now available, and this rule will
promulgate those revised baseline values, and also incorporate several
minor technical corrections tothe existing rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4621.
Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, 20460
Phone: 734-214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: brunner.christine@epamail.epa.gov
Paul Cort, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, ORC2,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 415-972-3921
Fax: 415-972-3570
Email: cort.paul@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ97
[[Page 38222]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3181. ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED INTERNATIONAL NOX STANDARD FOR AIRCRAFT
ENGINES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; ``CAA 231 to 232''; 42 USC 7571 to
7572; 5 USC 552(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 87.1; 40 CFR 87.21; 40 CFR 87.64; 40 CFR 87.71; 40
CFR 87.10; 40 CFR 87.31(b); 40 CFR 87.82; 40 CFR 87.89
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of this final rulemaking is to amend the existing
United States regulations governing the exhaust emissions from new
commercial aircraft gas turbine engines. The amendment will codify into
United States law the recently amended voluntary NOx emission standard
of the United Nation's International Civil Aviation Organization
(ICAO), thus bringing the United States emission standards into
alignment with the internationally adopted standards. This NOx standard
was adopted at the ICAO/Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection
(CAEP) 4 meeting in 1998. The implementation of the standard is to
begin in January 2004. Further, this amendment will establish
consistency between U.S. and international requirements and test
procedures. This action is necessary to ensure that domestic commercial
aircraft meet international standards and the public can be assured
that they are receiving the air quality benefits of the international
standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/30/03 68 FR 56226
Final Action 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4631.
Sectors Affected: 33641 Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing;
336412 Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing; 3336 Engine,
Turbine, and Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing; 336413 Other
Aircraft Part and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bryan Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6407, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4832
Fax: 734 214-4018
Email: manning.bryan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK01
_______________________________________________________________________
3182. CALIFORNIA GASOLINE TECHNICAL CORRECTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.81(a)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule corrects final regulations which were published in
the Federal Register on March 29, 2001 (66 FR 17230). The corrected
regulatory provision restores the definition of California gasoline as
used in the enforcement exemptions for California gasoline under the
regulation of fuels and fuel additives.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4722.
Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, 20460
Phone: 734-214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: brunner.christine@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK56
_______________________________________________________________________
3183. ANTI-DUMPING BASELINE RECALCULATION FOR DOWNSTREAM OXYGENATE
ADDITION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule would allow a refiner who added oxygenate after
sampling and just before shipment to exclude that oxygenate from its
anti-dumping baseline determination. This exclusion of oxygenate is
already allowed for a refinery's gasoline to which oxygenate was added
outside of the refinery gate. This rule will have limited application,
and could provide relief to small refiners.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4706.
Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, 20460
Phone: 734-214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: brunner.christine@epamail.epa.gov
Patrice Simms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 202-564-5593
Email: simms.patrice@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK69
_______________________________________________________________________
3184. REGULATION OF FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES: MODIFICATIONS TO STANDARDS
AND REQUIREMENTS FOR REFORMULATED AND CONVENTIONAL GASOLINE INCLUDING
BUTANE BLENDERS AND ATTEST ENGAGEMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7454(c); 42 USC 7454(k); 42 USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Through the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Congress
mandated that EPA promulgate regulations for reformulated and
conventional gasoline. The purpose of this mandate was to reduce
vehicle emissions of toxic and ozone-forming compounds. EPA published
the regulations on February 16, 1994. On July 11, 1997, EPA published a
proposed rule that included various minor adjustments to the 1994 rule.
The emissions benefits achieved from the reformulated gasoline and
conventional gasoline programs would not be reduced by the proposed
changes. On December 31, 1997, EPA finalized many of the proposed
[[Page 38223]]
changes. This rule would finalize the remaining changes that were not
included in the December 31, 1997 final rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/11/97 62 FR 37338
Final (Partial) 12/31/97 62 FR 68196
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4758.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 42271 Petroleum Bulk
Stations and Terminals
Agency Contact: Marilyn Bennett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9624
Email: bennett.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK77
_______________________________________________________________________
3185. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE; REFRIGERANT RECYCLING;
CERTIFICATION OF RECOVERY AND RECOVERY/RECYCLING EQUIPMENT INTENDED FOR
USE WITH SUBSTITUTE REFRIGERANTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; 42 USC 7671(g) ``CAA 608''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82(F)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is amending the rule on refrigerant recycling equipment
intended for use with Substitute Refrigerants: EPA is amending the rule
on refrigerant recycling, promulgated under section 608 of the Clean
Air Act, to clarify how the requirements of section 608 extend to
refrigerant recovery and/or recycling equipment intended for use with
substitutes for CFC and HCFC refrigerants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/11/98 63 FR 32044
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3560.1. Split from RIN 2060-AF37.
Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9870
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL77
_______________________________________________________________________
3186. CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRY PETITION TO REMOVE ETHYLENE GLYCOL
MONOBUTYL ETHER FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT LIST OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency received a petition to remove Ethylene Glycol
Monobutyl ether (EGBE, 2-Butoxyethanol) from the American Chemistry
Council on August 29, 1997, with additional submittals through December
21, 1998. This action will address that petition. A final decision on
the petition will involve the resolution of toxicological issues with
EGBE, including whether or not it is a human carcinogen. The
institutional structure under which the petition will be considered is
as follows: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to regulate 188 compounds
that are listed as air toxics, also known as hazardous air pollutants.
Air toxics are those pollutants known, or suspected, to cause cancer
and other human health problems. The law allows EPA to consider
petitions to modify the list, by adding or removing substances.
Individuals seeking to remove a substance must demonstrate that there
are adequate data to determine that emissions, outdoor concentrations,
bioaccumulation, or atmospheric deposition of the substance may not
reasonably be anticipated to damage human health or the environment.
Once EPA receives a petition, it conducts two reviews: a completeness
review, to determine whether there is sufficient information on which
to base a decision; and a technical review, to evaluate the merits of
the petition. The EPA also requests and considers information from the
public. After a comprehensive technical review of both the petition and
the information received from the public to determine whether the
petition satisfies the requirements of the CAA, the review team
recommends to the Administrator whether to grant the petition. If the
Administrator decides to grant a petition, we propose a rule in the
Federal Register which proposes a modification of the HAP list and
presents the reasoning for doing so. The proposed rule is open to
public comment and public hearing If the Administrator decides to deny
a petition, a notice setting forth an explanation of the reasons for
denial is published instead. A notice of denial constitutes final
Agency action of nationwide scope and applicability, and is subject to
judicial review as provided in the CAA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/21/03 68 FR 65648
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4800.
Agency Contact: Kelly Rimer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2962
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: rimer.kelly@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL87
_______________________________________________________________________
3187. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: PROCESS FOR EXEMPTING EMERGENCY
USES OF METHYL BROMIDE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: PL 105-277, sec 764
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
[[Page 38224]]
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on
substances that deplete the ozone layer, this rule will seek to create
an exemption for emergency uses of methyl bromide, an ozone depleting
substance, after the phase-out date of 2005. This exemption will be
limited to no more than 20 metric tons per emergency event. This is a
deregulatory action that will decrease burden on producers, importers,
distributors and applicators of methyl bromide as well as end-users of
methyl bromide who are growers and owners of stored food products while
still achieving the environmental objectives of the program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4819.
Agency Contact: Kate Choban, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9337
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: choban.kate@epamail.epa.gov
Hodayah Finman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9246
Fax: 202 565-2079
Email: finman.hodayah@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL94
_______________________________________________________________________
3188. NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER;
AMENDMENT TO REFLECT COURT ORDER VACATING CERTAIN RULES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; 5 USC 553
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50, 53, 58
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., v. EPA, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated revisions to the
PM10 national ambient air quality standards issued by EPA in 1997, and
left intact the pre-existing PM10 standards. To conform the Code of
Federal Regulations to the court's decision, it is necessary to remove
the revised standards and all associated regulations and interpretative
materials. Because this is purely a ministerial action, final
rulemaking without opportunity for public review and comment is
justified under ``good cause'' provisions of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
DFRM Amendment 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4837.
Agency Contact: Eric Ginsburg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C304-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0877
Fax: 919 541-4511
Email: ginsburg.eric@epamail.epa.gov
Karen Martin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5274
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: martin.karen@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM02
_______________________________________________________________________
3189. CLEAN AIR OZONE DESIGNATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7407, 7501 to 7515,7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81
Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, April 15, 2004.
Abstract: In 1997, EPA promulgated the revised National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. This action is intended to
promulgate designations and classifications for areas across the
country as attainment/unclassifiable or nonattainment. The CAA defines
a nonattainment area to include the area that is violating the NAAQS
and any nearby areas that are contributing to the violation of the
NAAQS. The process for designations following promulgation of a NAAQS
is contained in Section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. EPA requested States and
Tribes to make recommendations regarding attainment of their areas by
July 15, 2003. EPA reviewed the recommended designations and made
modifications as deemed necessary to these recommendations on December
3, 2003. EPA's December 3rd letters provided an opportunity for States
and Tribes to defend their recommended positions. In cases where the
States or Tribes do not submit recommendations, EPA will promulgate the
designations for areas it deems appropriate. Final ozone designations
will be promulgated on April 15, 2004. At that time EPA will designate
all areas either ``attainment'' or ``nonattainment'' for the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. This notice is also intended to take final action to defer
on a rolling basis the effective date of nonattainment designations for
certain areas of the country that do not meet the 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
Early Action Compact areas (EACs) have agreed to reduce ground-level
ozone pollution earlier than the CAA requires and toattain the standard
by December 31, 2007. This final rule establishes the first of three
dates by which EPA will defer the effective date of nonattainment
designation for compact areas or portions of compact areas, so long as
these areas meet agreed-upon milestones. The impact of the
nonattainment designation for these areas will be deferred first until
September 30, 2005. Prior to the time the first deferral expires, EPA
intends to take further action to propose and promulgate a second
deferred effective date of nonattainment designation until December 31,
2006 for those areas that continue to fulfill all compact obligations.
Prior to the time the second deferral expires, EPA intends to propose
and promulgate a third and final deferral until April 15, 2008, for
those areas that continue to meet all compact milestones.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/30/04 69 FR 23858
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4839. Promulgation of SAN 4839 will include
the material formerly proposed as SAN
[[Page 38225]]
4798. SAN 4798 has been merged into SAN 4839.
Agency Contact: Annie Nikbakht, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-02, Durham, NC 27701
Phone: 919-541-5246
Fax: 919-541-0824
Email: nikbakht.annie@epamail.epa.gov
Sharon Reinders, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5284
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: reinders.sharon@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM03
_______________________________________________________________________
3190. CLEAN AIR FINE PARTICLE DESIGNATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7404(d)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule sets out final air quality designations and
classifications for all areas of the United States as required by
section 107 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The air quality status of an
area is represented by the designation of the area. Designations are
objectively based upon air quality monitoring data and other relevant
information pertaining to the air quality of the area. Area
designations of attainment/unclassifiable means that the area has
sufficient data to determine that the area is meeting the PM-2.5 NAAQS,
or that due to no data being available for the area, or insufficient
data being available, EPA cannot make a determination for the area.
States and Tribes were requested to make their recommendations to EPA
on the attainment status of their respective areas by February 2004.
EPA will review the recommended designations and may make modifications
as deemed necessary. If EPA determines that a modification to the
recommendations is required, EPA will notify the State orTribe of their
decision no later than 120 days prior to promulgating a final
designation, which provides an opportunity for them make a case for why
EPA's modification may be inappropriate. In cases where a State or
Tribe does not make a recommendation, the EPA will promulgate the
designation that it deems appropriate. The final date for promulgating
designations for PM-2.5 will be December 31, 2004
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4840.
Agency Contact: Larry Wallace, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, C504-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0906
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: wallace.larry@epamail.epa.gov
Rich Damberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5592
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM04
_______________________________________________________________________
3191. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE; REFRIGERANT RECYCLING;
SUBSTITUTE REFRIGERANTS; LEAK REPAIR REQUIREMENTS FOR REFRIGERATION AND
AIR-CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; 42 USC 7671(g) ``CAA 608''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82(F)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is amending the leak repair requirements for commercial,
comfort cooling, and industrial process refrigeration appliances,
promulgated under section 608 of the Clean Air Act. This rule will
address methods to calculate leak rates, amend definitions concerning
leak repair, and clarify how the leak repair requirements of section
608 extend to appliances using refrigerants that are substitutes for
CFC and HCFC refrigerants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/11/98 63 FR 32044
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3560.2. Split from RIN 2060. Split from RIN
2060-AF37.
Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washignton, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9870
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM05
_______________________________________________________________________
3192. NESHAP: REINFORCED PLASTIC COMPOSITES--AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.5780 to 63.5935 (Revisions)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Since publication of the final Reinforced Plastic Composites
NESHAP, we have discovered several minor errors. We also have been told
that some of the rule language is confusing. This action will correct
those errors and clarify some of the rule language. It should not make
any substantive changes to the stringency of the rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4863.
Agency Contact: Keith Barnett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5605
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: barnett.keith@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Washington, DC 20460
[[Page 38226]]
Phone: 919-541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM23
_______________________________________________________________________
3193. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: LISTING OF
SUBSTITUTES FOR OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES--FIRE SUPPRESSION AND
EXPLOSION PROTECTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414, 7601, 7671 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule would list whether several powdered aerosol fire
suppressants are acceptable (subject to narrowed use limits) for use as
substitutes for ozone-depleting halon 1301 (bromotrifluoromethane) as
total flooding agents. Use would be restricted to the applications and
locations suggested by the manufacturers of these alternative fire
suppressants (e.g., use only in normally unoccupied areas). For one
fire suppressant the current restriction on use in occupied areas would
be removed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4857.
Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9163
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: sheppard.margaret@epamail.epa.gov
Bella Maranion, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9749
TDD Phone: 630-443-4376
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: maranion.bella@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM24
_______________________________________________________________________
3194. NESHAP: SURFACE COATING OF METAL CANS--AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for metal can surface coating operations located at major
sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) were promulgated on 11/13/
2003 (68 FR 64432). The final standards implement section 112(d) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring these operations to meet HAP emission
standards reflecting the application of the maximum achievable control
technology (MACT). The final rule will protect air quality and promote
public health by reducing emissions of HAP from facilities in the metal
can surface coating source category. This action provides technical
amendments to correct equations used in demonstrating compliance with
the emission limits in the final rule. This action does not change the
emission limits promulgated in the final rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4864.
Agency Contact: Paul Almodovar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM28
_______________________________________________________________________
3195. NESHAP: PRINTING, COATING, AND DYEING OF
FABRICS AND OTHER TEXTILES--AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for existing and new fabric and other textile coating,
printing, slashing, dyeing, and finishing operations were promulgated
on May 12, 2003. The final standards implement section 112(d) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring all major sources to meet the
hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emission standards reflecting the
application of the maximum achievable control technology (MACT). This
action provides amendments to the final rule to clarify the
applicability of the rule to certain synthetic fiber manufacturing
operations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4862.
Agency Contact: Paul Almodovar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM29
_______________________________________________________________________
3196. REGULATION OF FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVES: GASOLINE
AND DIESEL TEST METHODS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.46(a)(1); 40 CFR 80.46(a)(2); 40 CFR
80.46(f)(3)(i); 40 CFR 80.46(g)(2)(i); 40 CFR 80.580(a)(2)(i); 40 CFR
80.580(a)(3)(ii)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Fuel manufacturers of gasoline and diesel fuel are required
to measure certain properties in order to demonstrate compliance with
our motor vehicle fuels programs at 40 CFR part 80. This rule
promulgates test method changes which are approved under the
jurisdiction of the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM).
The American Petroleum Institute (API) recently recommended these test
method changes to the Agency. The Agency has evaluated these
recommended test methods
[[Page 38227]]
changes, agrees with them, and believes they are based on good science.
Furthermore, they would provide additional flexibility to the regulated
parties. Specifically, the following changes would occur by this
action: 1) Remove the current sunset provision of September 1, 2004,
for the alternative test methods, ASTM D 4815 and ASTM D 1319, and
continue to allow their use as alternative test methods until a
performance-based test method (PBTM) rule is promulgated by the Agency.
In the future, EPA intends to promulgate a PBTM rule which would set
criteria for the qualification of alternative test methods. Since we
believe the use of these two alternative test methods has been
effective, we believe it would be prudent to continue to allow the use
of these two alternative test methods until a PBTM rule is promulgated.
Once a PBTM rule has been established, these alternative test methods
would likely qualify under the PBTM rule's criteria. The rule that is
the subject of this abstract would remove the current sunset provision
for these two alternative test methods. 2) Designate ASTM D 6667 as the
designated test method for measuring sulfur in butane because its more
readily available and a better test method than the current designated
test method, ASTM D 3246. This rule would allow the use of the
originally designated test method, ASTM D 3246, as an alternative test
method until a PBTM rule is promulgated. 3) This rule would update two
current ASTM test methods allowed by the Agency for measuring sulfur in
gasoline and diesel fuel to their most recent ASTM version.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4895.
Agency Contact: Joe Sopata, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9034
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: sopata.joe@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Kortum, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9022
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: kortum.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM42
_______________________________________________________________________
3197. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: IMPORT PETITIONING REQUIREMENTS
FOR HALON-1301 AIRCRAFT FIRE EXTINGUISHING VESSELS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will provide an exemption under the import
petitioning requirements for used ozone-depleting substances. The
petitioning requirements outline the information that importers must
submit to the Administrator at least forty working days before a
shipment is to leave the foreign port of export. This rule will reduce
the administrative burden of anyone petitioning to import aircraft fire
extinguishing spherical pressure vessels containing halon-1301 (``halon
bottles'') for hydrostatic testing in the United States. The rule would
require importers to adhere to all import petitioning requirements but
would require one petition to be submitted annually for all shipments
rather than submission of a petition for each individual shipment forty
working days prior to export. Halon bottles are individual bottles
containing halon-1301 that are connected to a larger fire suppression
system within an aircraft. The halon bottles are brought into the
United States for hydrostatic testing in which the halon is removed,
the bottles are tested to ensure durability and effectiveness, and the
same amount or more of halon is replaced back in the bottles and
exported once again. The halon bottles must be routinely tested under
Federal Aviation Administration and United States Department of
Transportation regulations. The exemption to minimize the import
petitioning requirements is being initiated because the bottles are not
being imported for the eventual use or resale of the halon contained in
the bottles and because hydrostatic testing of the bottles is required
under FAA and DOT regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4900.
Agency Contact: Jabeen Akhtar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9313
Fax: 202-564-2155
Email: akhtar.jabeen@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM46
_______________________________________________________________________
3198. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS PRODUCTION;
AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action amends wastewater provisions in the final rule to
be more consistent with later standards for chemical manufacturing.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4892.
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5402
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM52
[[Page 38228]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3199. PROTECTION OF THE STRATOSPHERIC OZONE:
ALTERNATIVES FOR THE MOBILE AIR CONDITIONING SECTOR UNDER THE
SIGNIFICANT NEW ALTERNATIVES POLICY (SNAP) PROGRAM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671k
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.180
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking will list two new alternatives to ozone
depleting substances in the mobile air conditioning sector and outline
the conditions necessary for their safe use. These new alternatives
have better energy efficiency and lower impacts on the environment than
currently available systems. By approving these systems under SNAP, EPA
will provide additional choices to the automotive industry which, if
adopted would reduce the impact of mobile air conditioners on the
global environment. The automotive industry, if they chose to adopt
these technologies, would be required to comply with the conditions
necessary to deploy these systems in a safe manner.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4918.
Agency Contact: Erin Birgfeld, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9079
Fax: 202 343-2342
Email: birgfeld.erin@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Godwin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9324
Fax: 202-343-2363
Email: godwin.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM54
_______________________________________________________________________
3200. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: SITE-
SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA IN TOMAHAWK,
WISCONSIN
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.443; 40 CFR 63.457; 40 CFR 63.453
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This site specific regulation will allow Packaging
Corporation of America (PCA) to operate its semi-chemical pulp and
paper mill with an alternative control technology for its hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs). This alternative treatment has been approved by the
EPA and its use will be conducted as a pilot project under the May 5,
1998, Joint State/EPA Agreement to Pursue Regulatory Innovation. An
applicable federal air rule requires semi-chemical pulp and paper mills
to collect and incinerate their vent gases. As an alternative
treatment, PCA will collect and hard-pipe vent gas condensates to their
on-site wastewater treatment plant. The vent gas condensates contain a
large proportion of the vent gas HAPs, and the HAPs are effectively
treated in the wastewater treatment plant. PCA has agreed to accept as
an enforceable limit a methanol destruction rate of approximately two
times the amount of methanol that would be destroyed with the
technology prescribed in the federal air rule. Methanol is an
appropriate surrogate for the total HAPs in the vent gases. Data from a
full scale treatability study conducted by PCA in June 2001 indicate
that the alternative treatment technology may be capable of achieving
approximately five times greater methanol treatment than prescribed in
the air rule, although PCA will not have to commit to achieving this
greater destruction rate.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4816.
Agency Contact: Eileen Furey, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, C-14J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 312-886-7950
Fax: 312-886-0747
Email: furey.eileen@epamail.epa.gov
David Beck, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, E14302, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5421
Email: beck.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA33
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3201. NESHAP: OFF-SITE WASTE AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS RESIDUAL RISK STANDARD
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, July 1, 2004.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based emissions standards (``MACT''
standards]
for this source category under section 112(d) of the Clean
Air Act, codified in 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD. The current action,
required by Section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act, is to assess residual
risks after compliance with Subpart DD, and develop additional emission
standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4695.
Sectors Affected: 56221 Waste Treatment and Disposal
[[Page 38229]]
Agency Contact: Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK68
_______________________________________________________________________
3202. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(7); AVAILABILITY OF
INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC; TECHNICAL AMENDMENT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: ``CAA 112(r)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.210
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and its
implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 68 require certain stationary
sources to report an Off-site Consequence Analysis (OCA), including a
worst-case release scenario, in a Risk Management Plan (RMP) that is to
be made available to the public. In response to concerns that posting
OCA information on the Internet might increase the risk of terrorist
and other criminal activities, on August 5, 1999 the Chemical Safety
Information, Site Securityand Fuels Regulatory Relief Act (CSISSFRRA)
was enacted. The Act requires the President to promulgate regulations
governing the distribution of the OCA sections of RMPs that, in the
opinion of the President, would minimize the likelihood of accidental
releases and the risk of terrorist and other criminal activities
associated with posting this information. The President delegated his
rulemaking authority to the Attorney General and the Administrator of
EPA, who jointly promulgated the required regulations at 40 CFR Part
1400. The Part 1400 regulations restrict the public's access to the OCA
sections of RMPs in certain ways. As currently drafted, however,
section 68.210(a) of Part 68 states that RMPs are available to the
public under CAA section 114, which makes information collected under
the CAA, including RMPs in their entirety, available to the public,
except for confidential business information. EPA is therefore revising
40 CFR Section 68.210(a) to reflect the August 2000 rulemaking. The
revision will state that OCA data is made available to the public under
the provisions of 40 CFR Part 1400. This revision is not meant to
regulate any new entities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4607.
Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE95
_______________________________________________________________________
3203. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(3); REVISIONS TO THE
LIST OF SUBSTANCES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: ``CAA 112(r)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.130
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The list of substances subject to the Chemical Accident
Prevention requirements at 40 CFR Part 68 was promulgated on January
31, 1994. The Clean Air Act states that the list may be revised from
time to time by EPA's own motion or by petition and shall be reviewed
at least every 5 years. Since the January 1994 final list rule, EPA has
modified the listing for hydrochloric acid; deleted a category of
explosive chemicals; exempted flammable substances in gasoline used as
fuel and in naturally occurring hydrocarbon mixtures prior to initial
processing; and excluded flammable substances used as a fuel or held
for sale as a fuel at a retail facility. In fulfillment of the
statute's five-year review requirement, EPA has conducted a thorough
review of the list. Based on that review, EPA is proposing additions,
deletions and modifications to the list of substances. Deletions are
based on EPA's review of the chemical toxicity, physical property,
production/use quantity and accident history of currently listed
substances and new information or erroneous data that impacts the basis
of the chemical's listing. Other toxic and flammable chemicals are
proposed to be added because they meet the criteria for listing a toxic
or flammable substance. In addition, EPA proposes to revise the
reporting threshold and toxic endpoints of several toxic substances
based on updated toxicity information. Facilities (such as chemical
manufacturers, processors, and users), with more than the threshold
quantity of a listed substance in a process, are required to develop a
Risk Management Program and submit a Risk Management Plan to EPA. The
proposed changes to the list will ensure that facilities are properly
managing risks of the most acutely toxic and flammable chemicals that
could have an adverse impact on the facility and surrounding community
in event of an accidental release.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4619.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Kathy Franklin, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7987
Fax: 202 564-8444
Email: franklin.kathy@epamail.epa.gov
Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE96
[[Page 38230]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3204. EVALUATION OF UPDATED TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF
GASOLINE DEPOSIT CONTROL ADDITIVES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: ``CAA 211''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: All gasoline must contain additives to control the formation
of deposits in the fuel supply system and engine of motor vehicles. If
uncontrolled, such deposits can result in a significant increase in
motor vehicle emissions. This action will propose that updated test
procedures be adopted for the certification of gasoline deposit control
additives regarding their ability to control fuel injector and intake
valve deposits. The adoption of the updated procedures will ensure that
the gasoline deposit control program continues to ensure an adequate
level of deposit control, thereby preventing an increase in motor
vehicle emissions. The updated test procedures require less time to
perform and are less costly. Therefore, the adoption of the proposed
procedures will reduce the burden on industry of complying with the
gasoline deposit control program. The proposed action will not impact
small businesses, or state, local, or tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4531.
Agency Contact: Jeff Herzog, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, ASD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4227
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: herzog.jeff@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ61
_______________________________________________________________________
3205. NAAQS: SULFUR DIOXIDE (RESPONSE TO REMAND)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409 ``CAA 109''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50.4; 40 CFR 50.5
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On November 15, 1994, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) proposed not to revise the existing 24-hour and annual primary
standards. The EPA sought public comment on the need to adopt
additional regulatory measures to address the health risk to asthmatic
individuals posed by short-term peak sulfur dioxide exposure. On March
7, 1995, EPA proposed implementation strategies for reducing short-term
high concentrations of sulfur dioxide emissions in the ambient air. On
May 22, 1996, EPA published its final decision not to revise the
primary sulfur dioxide NAAQS. The notice stated that EPA would shortly
propose a new implementation strategy to assist States in addressing
short-term peaks of sulfur dioxide. The new implementation strategy -
the Intervention Level Program - was proposed on January 2, 1997. In
July 1996, the American Lung Association and the Environmental Defense
Fund petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for a
judicial review of EPA's decision not to establish a new 5-minute
NAAQS. On January 30, 1998, the court found that EPA did not adequately
explain its decision and remanded the case so EPA could explain its
rationale more fully. EPA published a schedule for responding to the
remand in the May 5, 1998 Federal Register. Since that notice, EPA has
continued to work on the proposed response to the remand by reviewing
additional SO2 air quality information. EPA published an informational
notice in the Federal Register on January 9, 2001 (66 R 1665). EPA
conducted monitoring to evaluate sources of SO2 peaks and is currently
analyzing these data.. The results of this project will inform the
response to the remand.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM NAAQS Review 11/15/94 59 FR 58958
NPRM NAAQS implementation 03/07/95 60 FR 12492
Final NAAQS Review 05/22/96 61 FR 25566
NPRM rev. NAAQS impl 01/02/97 62 FR 210
Notice resp to remand 05/05/98 63 FR 24782
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 1002.
Agency Contact: Dave Mckee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5288
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: mckee.dave@epamail.epa.gov
Susan Stone, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-1146
Email: stone.susan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AA61
_______________________________________________________________________
3206. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION OF AIR QUALITY: PERMIT
APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR NON-FEDERAL CLASS I AREAS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7670-7479 ``CAA 160-169''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act's prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) program, a State or tribe may redesignate their
lands as class I areas to provide enhanced protection for their air
quality resources. This rule will clarify the PSD permit review
procedures for new and modified major stationary sources near these
non-Federal class I areas. EPA seeks to develop clarifying PSD permit
application procedures that are effective, efficient, and equitable.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 05/16/97 62 FR 27158
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3919.
Agency Contact: Darrel Harmon, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6101A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7416
Fax: 202 501-1153
[[Page 38231]]
Email: harmon.darrel@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH01
_______________________________________________________________________
3207. PHASE I (FIP) TO REDUCE THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE IN THE
EASTERN UNITED STATES
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 97
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, January 25, 2003, EPA is required to
promulgate FIPs by January 25 2003 unless EPA approves the State
submitted plans.
Abstract: This action would promulgate Federal Implementation Plans
(FIPs) which require nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions decreases. The
intended effect is to reduce the transport of ozone (smog) pollution
and one of its main precursors (NOx) across State boundaries in the
eastern half of the United States. On October 27, 1998, EPA published a
final rule (the NOx SIP Call) which allowed States 12 months to
develop, adopt, and submit revisions to their State Implementation
Plans (SIPs) to address the transport problem. The Administrator is
required to promulgate a FIP within 2 years of: (1) finding that a
State has failed to make a required submittal or (2) finding that a
submittal is not complete or (3) disapproving a SIP submittal. On June
22, 2000, the D.C. Court of Appeals assigned a new SIP submittal date
of October 30, 2000. Eleven States (Virginia, West Virginia, Alabama,
Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, and Ohio) and the District of Columbia had not submitted
adequate SIPs, as announced in a findings rule published on December
26, 2000. All of these States have since submitted approvable plans.
(Note: The FIPs discussed here would apply to all elements of the NOx
SIP call that were not remanded to EPA by the court on March 3, 2000.
The portions of the SIP call that were remanded to EPA will be covered
under Phase 2 SIPs, and if necessary, separate FIP actions would be
prepared for those.)
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/21/98 63 FR 56393
Findings Action 12/26/00 65 FR 81366
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 4096.
Sectors Affected: 333415 Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating
Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment
Manufacturing; 325188 All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing;
325199 All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing; 325998 All Other
Miscellaneous Chemical Product Manufacturing; 324199 All Other
Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing; 33611 Automobile and Light
Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing; 32731 Cement Manufacturing; 331221
Cold-Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing; 221121 Electric Bulk Power
Transmission and Control; 221122 Electric Power Distribution; 327211
Flat Glass Manufacturing; 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation;
327213 Glass Container Manufacturing; 32512 Industrial Gas
Manufacturing; 325131 Inorganic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing; 331111
Iron and Steel Mills; 322122 Newsprint Mills; 333618 Other Engine
Equipment Manufacturing; 327212 Other Pressed and Blown Glass and
Glassware Manufacturing; 322121 Paper (except Newsprint) Mills; 32213
Paperboard Mills; 32511 Petrochemical Manufacturing; 48621 Pipeline
Transportation of Natural Gas; 325211 Plastics Material and Resin
Manufacturing; 32211 Pulp Mills; 22133 Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply
Agency Contact: Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: grano.doug@epamail.epa.gov
Jan King, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-02,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5665
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: king.jan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH87
_______________________________________________________________________
3208. NESHAP: AEROSPACE MANUFACTURING AND REWORK FACILITIES RESIDUAL
RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 30, 2003, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart GG. The current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA,
is to assess residual risks from the same source category, and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4653.
Sectors Affected: 33641 Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Tony Wayne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C435-09, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5439
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wayne.tony@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK08
_______________________________________________________________________
3209. NESHAP: ETHYLENE OXIDE FOR STERILIZATION FACILITIES - RESIDUAL
RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 6, 2002, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart O. This source category covers ethylene
[[Page 38232]]
oxide commercial sterilizers. The current action, required by section
112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks and develop additional
emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.
We have completed the risk assessment, received Work Group comments,
and are planning to submit for internal peer review. The assessment
results show cancer incidence less than 1.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4654.
Sectors Affected: 3254 Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing;
311942 Spice and Extract Manufacturing
Agency Contact: David Markwordt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C435-B, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0837
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: markwordt.david@epamail.epa.gov
Chris Stoneman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-
15, C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-0823
Email: stoneman.christopher@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK09
_______________________________________________________________________
3210. NESHAP: GROUP II POLYMERS AND RESINS - RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, March 8, 2003, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA. This source category covers
certain chemical process units used to manufacture products. The
current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess
residual risks from this same source category, and develop additional
emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4657.
Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5402
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK13
_______________________________________________________________________
3211. NESHAP: NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR MARINE TANK VESSEL LOADING
OPERATIONS - RESIDUAL RISK STANDARD
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 19, 2003, Final Action.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart Y. This source category covers tanks or ships that contain
gasoline, crude oil, or HAPs in bulk. The current action, required by
section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks from this same
source category, and develop additional emission standards, as
necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4661.
Sectors Affected: 483 Water Transportation
Agency Contact: David Markwordt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C435-B, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0837
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: markwordt.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK17
_______________________________________________________________________
3212. NESHAP: SECONDARY LEAD SMELTING RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 23, 2003, -.
Abstract: National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for secondary lead smelting were promulgated on June 23, 1995
under Clean Air Act Section 112(d). The standards establish emission
limitations and work practice standards for all new and existing
secondary lead smelters that produce refined lead from lead scrap,
mainly lead acid batteries. Clean Air Act Section 112(f) requires us to
assess within 8 years of promulgation of a NESHAP the remaining risk to
the public and to develop additional more stringent standards if such
standards are needed to protect the public health with an ample margin
of safety. This action is to examine the remaining risk from secondary
lead smelters and to develop new risk based standards, if warranted.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4665.
Sectors Affected: 331492 Secondary Smelting, Refining, and Alloying of
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and Aluminum)
Agency Contact: Iliam Rosario, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5308
[[Page 38233]]
Fax: 919 541-5308
Email: rosario.iliam@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK19
_______________________________________________________________________
3213. NESHAP: SHIPBUILDING AND SHIP REPAIR SURFACE COATING -- RESIDUAL
RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 31, 2003, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart II. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from the
painting, welding, and sandblasting of ships under construction or
repair at major sources. The current action, required by section 112(f)
of the CAA, is to assess residual risks from this same source category,
and develop additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an
ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4666.
Sectors Affected: 336611 Ship Building and Repairing
Agency Contact: Mohamed Serageldin, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, C539-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2379
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: serageldin.mohamed@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK20
_______________________________________________________________________
3214. NESHAP: HALOGENATED SOLVENT CLEANING - RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 2, 2002, -.
Abstract: This action is required by the CAA to assess residual risk
and develop standards as necessary to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/05
Final Action 08/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4668.
Sectors Affected: 335999 All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment
and Component Manufacturing; 332999 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated
Metal Product Manufacturing; 336999 All Other Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing; 337124 Metal Household Furniture Manufacturing; 332116
Metal Stamping; 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing; 336 Transportation
Equipment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Lynn Dail, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2363
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK22
_______________________________________________________________________
3215. NESHAP: MAGNETIC TAPE MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS RESIDUAL RISK STANDARD
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 15, 2002, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA. The current action, required
by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety. The facilities covered by the 112(d) standard and under
investigation in the project are Magnetic Tape coatings facilities that
manufacture audio and video recording and computer information storage,
and emit major source levels of air toxics. There are a total of six
facilities manufacturing magnetic tape in the nation. Half of these are
located in the State of Alabama. We have completed the risk assessment,
received Work Group comments, and are preparing for internal peer
review.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4669.
Sectors Affected: 334613 Magnetic and Optical Recording Media
Manufacturing; 33461 Manufacturing and Reproducing Magnetic and Optical
Media
Agency Contact: Lynn Dail, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2363
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK23
_______________________________________________________________________
3216. NESHAP: PRINTING AND PUBLISHING INDUSTRY - RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 30, 2004, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart KK. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from many
activities located at printing and publishing facilities -- primarily
the printing process itself, plus affiliated equipment such as
cleaning, ink and solvent mixing, chemical storage, and solvent
recovery. The current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is
to assess residual
[[Page 38234]]
risks from this same source category, and develop additional emission
standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4664.
Sectors Affected: 322221 Coated and Laminated Packaging Paper and
Plastics Film Manufacturing; 322222 Coated and Laminated Paper
Manufacturing; 323112 Commercial Flexographic Printing; 323111
Commercial Gravure Printing; 322212 Folding Paperboard Box
Manufacturing; 322225 Laminated Aluminum Foil Manufacturing for
Flexible Packaging Uses; 323119 Other Commercial Printing; 322223
Plastics, Foil, and Coated Paper Bag Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Dave Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK24
_______________________________________________________________________
3217. NESHAP: PETROLEUM REFINERIES--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, August 31, 2003.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart CC. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from
equipment at petroleum refineries, such as process vents, storage
vessels, and valve leaks. The current action, required by section
112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks from this same source
category, and develop additional emission standards, as necessary, to
provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4663.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Bob Lucas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0884
Fax: 919-541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK25
_______________________________________________________________________
3218. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR CHROMIUM EMISSIONS FROM HARD AND
DECORATIVE CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AND CHROMIUM ANODIZING TANKS -
RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, January 25, 2003, -.
Abstract: A national emission standard for chromium emissions from hard
and decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks was
previously promulgated under Section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. That
standard set emission limits for chromium emissions from hard and
decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks. The
Clean Air Act Section 112(f) requires us to assess within 8 years of
promulgation of a NESHAP the remaining risk to the public and to
develop additional more stringent standards if such standards are
needed to protect the public health with an ample margin of safety.
This action is to examine the remaining risk from hard and decorative
chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks and, if warranted,
to develop new risk based standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4750.
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK72
_______________________________________________________________________
3219. NESHAP: GROUP I POLYMERS AND RESINS -- RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 00 CFR NYD
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 6, 2004, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart U. This source category covers process units used to
manufacture elastomer products from raw materials. The current action,
required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks from
this same source category, and develop additional emission standards,
as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4656.
[[Page 38235]]
Sectors Affected: 325212 Synthetic Rubber Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK12
_______________________________________________________________________
3220. NESHAP: HAZARDOUS ORGANIC NESHAP (HON) RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, April 22, 2003, -.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA. The current action, required
by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety. This rule will cover the major sources of air emissions
within the synthetic organic chemical industry.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4659.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Mark Morris, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5416
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: morris.mark@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK14
_______________________________________________________________________
3221. NESHAP: GROUP IV POLYMERS AND RESINS--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 12, 2004.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart JJJ. This source category covers chemical process units used to
manufacture thermoplastic products from raw materials. The current
action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual
risks from this same source category, and develop additional emission
standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4658.
Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK15
_______________________________________________________________________
3222. INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT: RULEMAKING ON SECTION 126 PETITIONS
FROM THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND NEW JERSEY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 97
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 14, 1999, The rulemaking
includes action on 4 separate petitions. See Additional Information.
Abstract: In April through July 1999, 3 Northeastern States (New
Jersey, Maryland, and Delaware) and the District of Columbia submitted
individual petitions to EPA in accordance with section 126 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). Each petition specifically requests that EPA make a
finding that nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from certain stationary
sources in other States significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment
and maintenance problems with respect to the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone
standards in the petitioning State. If EPA makes such a finding of
significant contribution, EPA is authorized to establish Federal
emissions limits for the sources. The petitions rely on the analyses
from EPA's NOx SIP call. The sources targeted by the petitions are
large electricity generating units and large non-electricity generating
units, as defined in EPA's NOx SIP call. The EPA took rulemaking action
on similar petitions from 8 other Northeastern States that were
submitted in 1997.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4383. There is a different statutory
deadline associated with each petition based on the date of receipt by
EPA: New Jersey - 12/14/99, Maryland - 01/01/00, Delaware - 02/10/00,
District of Columbia - 03/07/00
Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
[[Page 38236]]
and Radiation, MD-15, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov
David Cole, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-15,
C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5565
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: cole.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI99
_______________________________________________________________________
3223. STREAMLINED EVAPORATIVE TEST PROCEDURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521(m)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will streamline the test procedure used to
establish compliance with evaporative emission requirements for light
duty vehicles and trucks. The current test procedure requires both two
and three day diurnal emission tests, as well as running-loss testing.
The revisions will delete the three day requirement and add
flexibilities for running-loss compliance. This will enable
manufacturers to save significant resources without any decrease in
environmental benefits.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3910.
Agency Contact: David Good, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 49105
Phone: 734-214-4450
Email: good.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH34
_______________________________________________________________________
3224. CONTROL OF METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: ``Not Yet Determined''
CFR Citation: 00 CFR NYD
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering taking action to control the use of Methyl
Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE), which is an organic compound that is
primarily used as a fuel additive in gasoline. MTBE has been used to
meet the oxygen requirement established by the Federal Reformulated
Gasoline Program (RFG) established by the 1990 amendments to the Clean
Air Act (CAA). Over 85 percent of reformulated gasoline contains MTBE.
EPA is concerned that the widespread use of MTBE may have resulted in
the contamination of groundwater and drinking water supplies,
threatening their future use. While current detections levels are
generally believed to be below levels that may cause public health
concerns, low level MTBE contamination may render water unpotable due
to offensive taste and odor. In November of 1998, EPA established a
Blue Ribbon Panel to investigate air quality benefits and water quality
concerns associated with oxygenates, including MTBE, in gasoline, and
to provide independent advice and recommendations on ways to maintain
air quality while protecting water quality. In September, 1999, the
panel recommended that the use of MTBE be substantially reduced. EPA is
now evaluating the Blue Ribbon Panel's recommendations, and has
conducted a preliminary review of authorities available to address
risks associated with MTBE. EPA issued an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to inform the public of this preliminary inquiry, and to
solicit public comment on possible regulatory action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 03/24/00 65 FR 16094
NPRM 11/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN 4393.
Agency Contact: Joseph Bachman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 5402, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9373
Fax: 202 565-2084
Email: bachman.joseph@epamail.epa.gov
Robert Perlis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2333A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5636
Email: perlis.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ00
_______________________________________________________________________
3225. OPERATING PERMITS: REVISIONS (PART 70)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7661 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 70
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In response to litigation on the operating permits rule
regulations, 40 CFR part 70, to provide more effective implementation
of part 70, and to address comments provided in response to notices of
proposed rulemaking, parts 70, 51 and 52 are being revised. The changes
will streamline the procedures for revising stationary-source operating
permits issued by State and local permitting authorities under title V
of the Clean Air Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Original 08/29/94 59 FR 44460
Supp NPRM 1 04/27/95 60 FR 20804
Supp NPRM 08/31/95 60 FR 45530
NPRM 07/27/98 63 FR 40053
Supp NPRM 3 To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 3412.
Agency Contact: Ray Vogel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C304-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3153
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: vogel.ray@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Hitte, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C304-
04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0886
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hitte.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF70
[[Page 38237]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3226. REVISED PERMIT REVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE FEDERAL OPERATING
PERMITS PROGRAM-PART 71
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7661(a)(d)(3)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 71.7
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The proposed regulatory change would streamline permit
revisions procedures for stationary air sources that are subject to the
Federal operating permits program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3922.
Agency Contact: Scott Voorhees, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5348
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: voorhees.scott@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Hitte, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C304-
04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0886
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hitte.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG92
_______________________________________________________________________
3227. SELECTION OF SEQUENCE OF MANDATORY SANCTIONS TO BE APPLIED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 502 OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7661a(d); 42 USC 7661a(g); 42 USC 7661a(i)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule would establish the order of sanctions for
operating permits program deficiencies under the mandatory sanctions
provisions of title V of the Clean Air Act. This rule would stipulate
that an emission offset sanction applies first and a highway funding
sanction six months later. Sanction application under section 502 of
the Clean Air Act is automatic under the timeframes prescribed once EPA
selects the sanction order; EPA's only discretion concerns the ordering
of sanctions as discussedabove. Thus, the only relevant potential
impact is the effect of applying, as a general matter, the emission
offset sanction six months before the highway sanction. The EPA does
not believe this will have a significant impact given the short period
of time the offset sanction will apply before the highway sanction
would apply when States fail to correct title V deficiencies. Moreover,
EPA also believes that, in the event applying the highway sanction is
not necessary six months following the offset sanction, because the
State has corrected the deficiency prompting the finding, applying the
offset sanction first eliminates the need for EPA and other agencies to
bear the greater administrative and implementation burden of having to
effectuate the highway sanction.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4700.
Agency Contact: Scott Voorhees, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5348
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: voorhees.scott@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Hitte, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C304-
04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0886
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hitte.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK46
_______________________________________________________________________
3228. PERFORMANCE WARRANTY AND INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE TEST PROCEDURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7541; 42 USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 85
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action establishes a new short test procedure for use in
I/M programs required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Vehicles
that are tested and failed using this procedure and that meet
eligibility requirements established by the act would be eligible for
free warranty repair from the manufacturers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/05
Final Action 12/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3263.
Agency Contact: Buddy Polovick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4928
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: polovick.buddy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE20
_______________________________________________________________________
3229. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY RULE AMENDMENT: CLARIFICATION OF TRADING
PROVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671 ``CAA 176(c)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 93
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The transportation conformity rule, promulgated in November
1993, ensures that transportation and air quality planning are
consistent with Clean Air Act air quality standards. The Open Market
Trading Guidance provides guidance to states for establishing a method
to quantify emissions reductions (called discrete emissions reductions
or DERs) that can be traded among parties and how such trading should
occur. This action will amend the transportation conformity rule to
clarify how emissions trading could be reconciled in the conformity
process.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
[[Page 38238]]
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3917.
Agency Contact: Angela Spickard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 49105
Phone: 734-214-4283
Email: spickard.angela@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH31
_______________________________________________________________________
3230. INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
FACILITIES; AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (Revision); 40 CFR 93 (New)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has had oversight
and policy development authority for Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
programs since the passage of the Clean Air Act (CAA) in 1970. The 1977
amendments to the CAA mandated I/M for certain areas with long-term air
quality problems and the 1990 amendments set forth standards for
implementation of I/M programs. EPA used the statutory requirements of
the Act, including I/M requirements for Federal facilities, to
promulgate regulations which states would use in the development of
their I/M State Implementation Plans (SIPs). Those rule requirements
effectively gave States certain authorities over the Federal
government. The Department of Justice has now ruled that Federal
sovereign immunity was not fully waived under the CAA for those
requirements and EPA should amend its rule to remove the requirement
that States include those elements in their SIPs. EPA is proposing to:
(1) Amend the Federal facilities I/M requirements by removing that
section; (2) correct existing I/M SIP approval actions which include
these elements; (3) establish new Federal facilities I/M program
requirements which Federal facilities in I/M program areas must meet in
order to comply with the Act; and (4) designate for each State which
section of the Act Federal agencies must comply with based on how that
State promulgated its I/M regulations. These changes will have minimal
to no impact on the States as no new requirements are being created.
The States are under no obligation, legal or otherwise, to modify
existing SIPs meeting the previously applicable requirements as a
result of this action, nor will emissions reduction credit be affected.
However, the changes will clarify for affected Federal facilities what
they must do to meet the CAA requirements by establishing new
regulations per those requirements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4348.
Agency Contact: Buddy Polovick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4928
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: polovick.buddy@epamail.epa.gov
Sara Schneeberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5592
Email: schneeberg.sara@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AI97
_______________________________________________________________________
3231. RESCINDING FINDING THAT PREEXISTING PM10 STANDARDS NO LONGER
APPLICABLE IN NORTHERN ADA COUNTY/BOISE, IDAHO
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50.6(d); 40 CFR 52.676; 40 CFR 81.313
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The EPA had previously taken action to revoke the PM-10
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for the Boise/Ada County
area in anticipation that a revised PM-10 NAAQS would soon be in place.
However, the DC Circuit court subsequently vacated the revised PM-10
NAAQS, the effectiveness of which served as the underlying basis for
EPA's decision to revoke the preexisting PM-10 NAAQS. Therefore, in
order to protect public health in the Boise/Ada County area, EPA is
proposing to reinstate the pre-existing PM-10 NAAQS. Without this
action there would be no Federal PM-10 NAAQS applicable to this area.
This action is tentatively subject to the terms of a settlement
agreement that was signed by all parties in January 2001. A Federal
Register notice of the proposed settlement requesting public comment
was published January 30, 2001 in accordance with section 113(g) of the
Act. No negative comments were received. EPA/DOJ signed the settlement
agreement and the State is in the processof carrying out its
obligations under the settlement agreement. The State submitted its
maintenance plan for Boise on 9/27/2002. Under the settlement, EPA
agreed to take final action on the State's submittal by 9/30/2003. On
July 30, 2003 a Federal Register notice was published proposing to
rescind the finding that the 1987 PM10 NAAQS are not applicable in the
Ada County/Boise, Idaho area, and simultaneously, to approve a PM10 SIP
maintenance plan for the Ada County/Boise Idaho area and to redesignate
the area from nonattainment to attainment. There will be a 30-day
comment period. Written comments must be received on or before August
29, 2003. Under the settlement agreement, we must sign and forward to
the Federal Register office our final action by September 30, 2003.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 1 06/26/00 65 FR 39321
Notice 07/26/00 65 FR 45953
NPRM 07/30/03 68 FR 44715
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Local, State
Additional Information: SAN 4391.
Agency Contact: Gary Blais, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, C504-02, RTP, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-3223
Fax: 919 541-5489
[[Page 38239]]
Email: blais.gary@epamail.epa.gov
Geoffrey Wilcox, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2344A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5601
Email: wilcox.geoffrey@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ05
_______________________________________________________________________
3232. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AND NONATTAINMENT
NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR): CLEAN UNITS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This proposed rule would revise the provisions for the clean
unit test contained in the major New Source Review (NSR) requirements.
This action proposes to revise the length of the clean unit designation
period contained in the final NSR rules. The current rules allow for
clean unit designation to be used for 10 years provided the source
meets the requirements to maintain clean unit status. This proposed
rule would recognize that the average life expectancy of control
equipment is 15 years rather than the 10 years contained in the final
rules. Permitting agencies and industry will benefit from this action
by potentially reducing the number of future permit actions. As a
result, this action reduces the compliance burden, including annual
compliance costs, for all sources subject to the major NSR program
requirements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/07
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4691.
Agency Contact: Juan Santiago, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C33903, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1084
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov
Lynn Hutchinson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C33903, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5795
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hutchinson.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK42
_______________________________________________________________________
3233. AMENDMENTS TO THE REQUIREMENTS ON VARIABILITY IN THE COMPOSITION
OF ADDITIVES CERTIFIED UNDER THE GASOLINE DEPOSIT CONTROL PROGRAM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, May 30, 2001, Settlement Agreement
with American Chemistry Council in 8/2000 requires publication of NPRM
``as expeditiously as practicable.''.
Abstract: A Direct Final Rule (DFRM) and parallel Notice of Proposed
Rule (NPRM) was published on November 5, 2001 in response to a
settlement agreement reached with the American Chemical Council (ACC)
regarding their litigation on the Gasoline Deposit Control Additive
Rule. This litigation pertained to the information that manufacturers
must provide on additive composition at the time of certification.
Adverse comments were received on two of the four amendments. A partial
withdrawal notice was published on January 24, 2002 which withdrew the
amendments on which we received adverse comments. In this action, we
plan to finalize the provisions that were withdrawn. The provisions we
plan to finalize are based on an ACC consensus position, which reduces
the burden on manufacturers in demonstrating compliance with limits on
the compositional variability of the deposit control additives, while
maintaining the emissions control benefits of the gasoline deposit
control program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 1 11/05/01 66 FR 55885
Final Action 2 11/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4557.1. Split from RIN 2060-AJ69. Action is
consistent with Settlement Agreement signed with American Chemistry
Council in January 2000, which became final in August, 2000 (no
comments were received in the public notice and comment). ACC v. EPA,
D.C. Cir. No. 94-1778 (consol).
Sectors Affected: 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jeff Herzog, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, ASD, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734-214-4227
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: herzog.jeff@epamail.epa.gov
Andrea Medici, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
ARLO/PTSLO, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5634
Fax: 202 564-5653
Email: medici.andrea@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK62
_______________________________________________________________________
3234. VOLUNTARY SUPERIOR MONITORING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 to 61; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Voluntary Superior Monitoring (VSM) project has been
revised from a regulatory to non-regulatory effort. Initially, the VSM
project was designed to provide incentives to industry to induce them
to conduct better or ``superior'' emissions monitoring than what is
required through regulation and permitting. We had planned to revise
the Parts 60, 61, and 63 general provisions to allow sources an option
to install and operate better emissions monitoring (than what is
regulatorily required) in return for incentives. This approach was
deemed unworkable, therefore we revised the goals of the VSM project to
aim for identifying opportunities for better or superior monitoring in
new rulemakings. Thus, the focus of VSM now is to work with OAQPS
regulation writers to find rules that would benefit from voluntary
upgrades of emissions monitoring. For example, we have inserted
language in an upcoming rule that allows states to
[[Page 38240]]
receive SIP credits for requiring sources to install better emissions
monitors. This is a ``win-win'' situation. Sources install the superior
monitors, find problems sooner, correct them quicker, and emit less
pollutants. This measure can save sources money in maintenance of
control devices while emitting less pollutants. Additionally, this
measure is much less expensive, but just as effective, than other
control measures.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4783.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal
Product Manufacturing; 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing;
333 Machinery Manufacturing; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing; 322 Paper Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing; 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 331
Primary Metal Manufacturing; 323 Printing and Related Support
Activities; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 221 Utilities;
321 Wood Product Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Tom Driscoll, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5135
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: driscoll.tom@epamail.epa.gov
Barrett Parker, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, EN-
341W, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5635
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: parker.barrett@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK85
_______________________________________________________________________
3235. DEFERRAL OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATIONS FOR 8-
HOUR OZONE NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR EARLY ACTION
COMPACT AREAS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7407; 42 USC 7601
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing to defer the effective date of nonattainment
air quality designations for ``Early Action Compact Areas'' that are
violating the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard, but
have agreed to reduce ground-level ozone pollution earlier than the
Clean Air Act requires. This proposal establishes the first of three
dates by which EPA would defer the effective date of nonattainment
designations for any of these areas that continues to meet all compact
milestones. In a separateaction, EPA will designate these areas
``nonattainment'' by April 15, 2004; however, as long as Early Action
Compact areas meet agreed-upon milestones, the impact of nonattainment
designation for the 8-hour ozone standard will be deferred until
September 30, 2005.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/16/03 68 FR 70108
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 4798. This action has been merged with SAN
4839. All further action will be under SAN 4839. SAN 4798 is hereby
withdrawn.
Agency Contact: David Cole, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5565
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: cole.david@epamail.epa.gov
Valerie Broadwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3310
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: broadwell.valerie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL85
_______________________________________________________________________
3236. CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRY PETITION TO REMOVE THE 2-PIECE CAN
SUBCATEGORY FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT SOURCE
CATEGORY LIST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 CFR 63
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency has received a petition to remove the 2-piece Can
subcategory from the Metal Can Surface Coating source category, which
is on the list of hazardous air pollutant source categories under
Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act. The Agency must review the
petition and either grant or deny the petition within 12 months of the
date the complete petition is received. If the Agency grants the
petition, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the FR,
allowing the opportunity for public comment. If the Agency denies the
petition, a notice of denial will be published in the FR providing an
explanation of the denial. The Can Manufactures Association submitted
the petition on November 4, 1996, and provided additional materials
through April 4, 1999. At that time we determined the petition was
complete. A final decision on the merits of the petition has been
delayed due to outstanding toxicological issues regarding 2 pollutants
(formaldehyde and ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE)), and due to a
technically weak ecological assessment prepared by the petitioner.
Issues with formaldehyde and EGBE should be resolved soon and we are
still awaiting an updated ecological assessment from the petitioner.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4799.
[[Page 38241]]
Agency Contact: Kelly Rimer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2962
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: rimer.kelly@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL86
_______________________________________________________________________
3237. NESHAP: FERROALLOYS PRODUCTION: FERROMANGANESE AND SILICOMANGANESE
RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 20, 2007.
Abstract: EPA developed technology-based emission standards for this
source category under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. The current
action, required by section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act, is to assess
residual risks and develop additional emission standard, as necessary,
to provide an ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4810.
Agency Contact: Margaret Sieffert, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 312-353-1151
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: sieffert.margaret@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL93
_______________________________________________________________________
3238. MINERAL WOOL PRODUCTION RESIDUAL RISK STANDARD
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: PL 91-190, sec 203; 42 USC 7401
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1175 to 63.1199
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs us to
assess the risk remaining (residual risk) after the application of
control technology standards under section 112(d) (MACT). The EPA is to
promulgate more stringent standards for a category or subcategory of
sources subject to MACT standards under section 112(d) if promulgation
of such standards is necessary to protect public health with an ample
margin of safety or to prevent (taking into consideration various
factors) adverse environmental effects. In particular, the CAA
specifies the cancer risk of concern for setting more stringent
standards. The CAA states that if the MACT standards do not reduce
lifetime excess cancer risk to the individual most exposed to
emissions. . . to less than one in one million, the Administrator shall
promulgate standards under this subsection for such source categories.
The standards to be promulgated under this subsection must provide an
ample margin of safety to protect public health in accordance with this
section (as in effect before the date of enactment of the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990), unless the Administrator determines that a more
stringent standard is necessary to prevent, taking into consideration
costs, energy, safety, and other relevant factors, an adverse
environmental impact. Section 112(f)(2)(B) expressly preserves EPA's
interpretation of an ample margin of safety developed in the 1989
benzene NESHAP final rule. EPA will review the mineral wool production
MACT standard and conduct analyses to determine whether the residual
risk warrants further regulation. The CAA requires that the residual
risk rules be promulgated (if necessary) within eight years [nine for
the two-year bin standards]
after the promulgation of the associated
MACT standard. The MACT rule for the mineral wool production source
category was promulgated on June 1, 1999. Therefore, the statutory
deadline for promulgating a residual risk rule (if necessary) for this
source category is Jue 1, 2007.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4825. Legal: Legislative deadline for the
residual risk rule is 8 years after promulgation of that source
category's MACT rule.
Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C-504-05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5167
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL96
_______________________________________________________________________
3239. NESHAP FOR FLEXIBLE POLYURETHANE FOAM PRODUCTION: RESIDUAL RISK
STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA promulgated technology-based emission standards for this
source category in 1998 under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act.
These standards are codified at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart III. The
current action, required by section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act, is to
assess residual risks that remain once that standard becomes effective,
and develop additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an
ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
[[Page 38242]]
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4831.
Agency Contact: Maria Noell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5607
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: noell.maria@epamail.epa.gov
Warren Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5124
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: johnson.warren@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL99
_______________________________________________________________________
3240. NESHAP: PHARMACEUTICALS PRODUCTION: RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, October 21, 2010, Residual risk
standards if necessary, otherwise, finding of no residual risk.
Abstract: EPA promulgated technology-based emission standards for this
source category in 1998 under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act.
These standards are codified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart FFF. The
current action, required by section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act, is to
assess residual risk that remains once that rule becomes effective, and
develop additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an
ample margin of safety.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4832.
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5402
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Randy Waite, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C540-
04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM00
_______________________________________________________________________
3241. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--PAINT STRIPPING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: This regulation is being pursued under the Clean Air Act,
Section 112(k). Under section 112(k), EPA developed a national strategy
to address air-toxic pollution from ``area'' sources, which are sources
consisting of several smaller pollution sources grouped within one
site. As part of that strategy, several area-source categories were
listed for possible regulation. Paint stripping area sources was listed
as one of those categories, and this rulemaking will address measures
to control pollution from the paint-stripping category.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4861.
Agency Contact: Tony Wayne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C435-09, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5439
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wayne.tony@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM07
_______________________________________________________________________
3242. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: AMENDMENTS
TO THE SECTION 608 LEAK REPAIR REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82, subpart F
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking will propose changes and amendments to the
refrigerant leak repair regulations (40 CFR 82, subpart F) promulgated
under Section 608 of the Clean Air Act. The goal of the regulations is
to protect the stratospheric ozone layer by promulgating regulations
that reduce the use and emissions of ozone-depleting refrigerants to
the lowest achievable level. This proposal will clarify the leak repair
regulations by requiring that owners and operators of comfort cooling,
commercial refrigeration, and industrial process refrigeration
appliances that have ozone-depleting charges greater than 50 pounds
calculate leak rates, verify all repairs, and document repair efforts.
This rulemaking will provide further clarity by adding definitions and
discussing compliance scenarios.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4856.
Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washignton, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9870
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov
Nancy Smagin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9126
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: smagin.nancy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM09
_______________________________________________________________________
3243. NESHAP: ASPHALT PROCESSING AND ASPHALT ROOFING
MANUFACTURING--AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is a direct final amendment with an accompanying
proposal to the national emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants for asphalt processing and asphalt
[[Page 38243]]
roofing manufacturing that will correct minor errors in that rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4855.
Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5262
Email: colyer.rick@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM10
_______________________________________________________________________
3244. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--GLASS
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) outlines the statutory
requirements for the EPA's stationary source air toxics program. The
ESD is currently working on the section 112(k) area source strategy to
address area source contributions of air toxic substances. With the
finalization of the Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy in July of
1999, the EPA introduced and outlined its ``risk based'' air toxics
program, which includes both regulatory and non-regulatory programs and
actions. The IntegratedUrban Air Toxics Strategy lists the goals of the
EPA's air toxics program, which are as follows: (1) reduce the
incidence of cancer attributable to exposure to hazardous air
pollutants by 75% nationally; (2) reduce national non-cancer risks
substantially; and (3) address risks which are disproportionately posed
on specific sub-populations and geographic areas. In order to
accomplish these goals, the EPA has integrated it's air toxics program
into four components. The first component is source specific regulatory
programs. This component includes the development of MACT standards
under section 112(d), MACT or generally available control technology
(GACT) standards112(k), residual risk standards under 112(f), and other
standards to regulate emissions of air toxics from specific sources.
The EPA will consider development of a NESHAP for glass manufacturing
area sources under section 112(k). Section 112(k) requires the
development of standards for area sources which account for 90% of
theemissions in urban areas of the 33 urban hazardous air pollutants
(HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy. These area
source standards can require control levels which are equivalent to
either MACT or GACT, as defined in section 112. The processes involved
in glass manufacturing are known to emit arsenic and lead. In 1986, EPA
promulgated the NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Glass
Manufacturing Plants. Since that time, EPA has re-evaluated both the
carcinogenicit4/10/1998) and the oral RfD assessment (02/01/1993) for
arsenic.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4873.
Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C-504-05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5167
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM12
_______________________________________________________________________
3245. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--ACRYLIC/
MODACRYLIC FIBER (AMF) PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, September 15, 2005.
Final, Statutory, September 15, 2006.
Abstract: This regulation is being pursued under the Clean Air Act,
section 112(k). Under section 112(k), EPA developed a national strategy
to address air-toxic pollution from ``area'' sources, which are sources
consisting of several small pollution sources grouped within one site.
As part of that strategy, several area-source categories were listed
for possible regulation. Acrylic/modacrylic fiber production sources
was listed as one of those categories, and this rulemaking will address
measures to control pollution from AMF facilities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4860. There is only one existing facility
in the USA that will be subject to this rule. The facility is currently
meeting the standards for major sources under 40 CFR 63 Subpart YY.
Agency Contact: Tony Wayne, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C435-09, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5439
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: wayne.tony@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM13
_______________________________________________________________________
3246. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.760 to 779
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: This regulation is being pursued under the Clean Air Act,
Section 112(k). Under section 112(k),
[[Page 38244]]
EPA developed a national strategy to address air-toxic pollution from
``area'' sources, which are sources that emit hazardous air pollutants
(HAP) below the major source level of 10 tons/year of a single HAP and
25 tons/year of all HAP. As part of that strategy, several area-source
categories were listed for regulation. Oil and Natural Gas (ONG)
production sources was listed as one of those categories,and this
rulemaking will address measures to control pollution from ONG
facilities. Oil and natural gas production processes are known to emit
benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene and xylene. In 1999, EPA promulgated
the NESHAP for Oil and Natural Gas Production.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4875.
Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3078
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: nizich.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM16
_______________________________________________________________________
3247. NESHAP: OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.760 to 63.779
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 17, 2007.
Abstract: EPA promulgated technology-based emission standards for this
source category in 1999 under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act.
These standards are codified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart HH. The current
action, required by section 112(f) and d(6) of the Clean Air Act, is to
assess residual risk that remains once that rule becomes effective, and
develop additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an
ample margin of safety; and to review the MACT standards promulgated in
1999 for developments in practices, processes and control technologies
and revise, as necessary, existing standards.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4847.
Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-04, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-3078
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: nizich.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM18
_______________________________________________________________________
3248. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS
MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will regulate hazardous air pollutant (HAP)
emissions from the industrial inorganic chemicals manufacturing
industry. This source category was listed for regulation under the
Urban Air Toxic Strategy to address HAP emissions from area sources.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4874.
Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5262
Email: colyer.rick@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Crowder, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5596
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: crowder.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM19
_______________________________________________________________________
3249. NESHAP: TOTAL FACILITY LOW RISK DETERMINATION
(TFLRD) FOR RESIDUAL RISK
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act requires that we assess
residual risk remaining after MACT and develop additional emission
standard, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety. Many
facilities have numerous MACT standards that they are subject to. This
action will provide a procedure for facilities to assess risk, and if a
facility wide low risk determination can be shown, to avoid applicable
residual risk standards. The evaluation will be made on a facility wide
HAP emissions basis.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4848.
Agency Contact: Bob Lucas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-0884
Fax: 919-541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
[[Page 38245]]
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM22
_______________________________________________________________________
3250. AREA SOURCE NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (NESHAP) FOR IRON AND STEEL FOUNDRIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) outlines the statutory
requirements for the EPA's stationary source air toxics program.
Section 112(k) requires the development of standards for area sources
which account for 90% of the emissions in urban areas of the 33 urban
hazardous air pollutants (HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air
Toxics Strategy. These area source standards can require control levels
which are equivalent to either maximum achievable control technology
(MACT) or generally available control technology (GACT), as defined in
section 112.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/07
Final Action 01/00/08
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4879.
Agency Contact: Conrad Chin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1512
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: chin.conrad@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM36
_______________________________________________________________________
3251. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--PLATING AND POLISHING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Section 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) outlines the statutory
requirements for the EPA's stationary source air toxics program.
Section 112(k) requires the development of standards for area sources
which account for 90% of the emissions in urban areas of the 33 urban
hazardous air pollutants (HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air
Toxics Strategy. These area source standards can require control levels
which are equivalent to either maximum achievable control technology
(MACT) or generally available control technology (GACT), as defined in
section 112. The Integrated Urban Air Toxics Strategy lists plating and
polishing as an area source category.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4886.
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-C439-02, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM37
_______________________________________________________________________
3252. AREA SOURCE NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (NESHAP) FOR INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND
INSTITUTIONAL BOILERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: C;lean Air Act sec112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.
Abstract: Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) outlines the statutory
requirements for EPA's stationary source air toxics program. Section
112(k) requires development of standards for area sources which account
for 90 percent of the emissions in urban areas of the 33 urban
hazardous pollutants (HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics
Strategy. These area source standards can require control levels which
are equivalent to either maximum achievable control technology (MACT)
or generally available control technology (GACT). The Integrated Air
Toxics Strategy lists industrial boilers and commercial/institutional
boilers as area source categories.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4884.
Agency Contact: Jim Eddinger, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-5426
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: eddinger.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RobertJ Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM44
_______________________________________________________________________
3253. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: SUBSTITUTE
REFRIGERANT RECYCLING; AMENDMENT TO THE DEFINITION OF REFRIGERANT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.154(a)
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 38246]]
Abstract: This action will correct the final rule entitled ``Protection
of Stratospheric Ozone: Refrigerant Recycling; Substitute
Refrigerants'' which was promulgated in the Federal Register on March
12, 2004 (69 FR 11946). Specifically, EPA is amending the regulatory
text for the definition of ``refrigerant'' at 40 CFR 82.152 and the
prohibition against venting substitute refrigerants at 40 CFR
82.154(a). These corrections reflect the preamble and intent of the
March 12, 2004 rule that maintained the statutory venting prohibition
while not otherwise regulating the sales or handling of substitute
refrigerants that do not consist of an ozone-depleting substance (ODS),
namely pure hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) and perfluorocarbon (PFC)
refrigerants. Failure to make this correction would result in the
unintentional regulation of substances that do not damage the ozone
layer. EPA has not been granted authority to promulgate such
regulations under the CAA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4917.
Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washignton, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9870
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM51
_______________________________________________________________________
3254. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--CLAY CERAMICS INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 112 or the Clean Air Act (CAA) outlines the statutory
requirements for the EPA's stationary source air toxics program.
Section 112(k) requires the development of standards for area sources
which account for 90 percent of the emissions in urban areas of the 33
urban hazardous air pollutants (HAP) listed in the Integrated Urban Air
Toxics Strategy. These area source standards can require control levels
which are equivalent to either maximum achievable control technology
(MACT) or generally available control technology (GACT), as defined in
section 112.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/06
Final Action 05/00/07
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4906.
Agency Contact: Joseph Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5446
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: wood.joe@epa.gov
Keith Barnett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5605
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: barnett.keith@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM53
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3255. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS REQUIREMENTS UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 112(R)(7); AMENDMENTS
TO THE SUBMISSION SCHEDULE AND DATA REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/09/04 69 FR 18819
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Vanessa Rodriguez
Phone: 202-564-7913
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: rodriguez.vanessa@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF09
_______________________________________________________________________
3256. PETITIONS TO DELIST SOURCE CATEGORIES FROM THE SOURCE CATEGORY
LIST, DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO SECTION 112(C) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn 05/18/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Kelly Rimer
Phone: 919-541-2962
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: rimer.kelly@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Guinnup
Phone: 919-541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ23
_______________________________________________________________________
3257. MOTOR VEHICLE AND ENGINE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FEES FOR: LIGHT-DUTY
VEHICLES AND TRUCKS; HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES AND ENGINES; NONROAD ENGINES;
AND MOTORCYCLES
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 (Revision)
[[Page 38247]]
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 05/11/04 69 FR 26221
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Trina Vallion
Phone: 734-214-4449
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: vallion.trina@epamail.epa.gov
Dan Harrison
Phone: 734-214-4281
Email: harrison.dan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ62
_______________________________________________________________________
3258. NESHAP: COMBUSTION TURBINE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 03/05/04 69 FR 10512
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Sims Roy
Phone: 919-541-5263
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: roy.sims@epamail.epa.gov
RobertJ Wayland
Phone: 919-541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG67
_______________________________________________________________________
3259. NESHAP: IRON AND STEEL FOUNDRIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/22/04 69 FR 21905
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Kevin Cavender
Phone: 919-541-2364
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: cavender.kevin@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE43
_______________________________________________________________________
3260. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS:
MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 11/10/03 68 FR 63852
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Randy McDonald
Phone: 919-541-5402
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov
Randy Waite
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE82
_______________________________________________________________________
3261. NESHAP: CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AMENDMENT (TIN-FREE STEEL)
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn 05/05/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine
Phone: 919-541-5289
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH08
_______________________________________________________________________
3262. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS:
MISCELLANEOUS COATING MANUFACTURING
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/11/03 68 FR 69164
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Randy Mcdonald
Phone: 919-541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epamail.epa.gov
Randy Waite
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK59
_______________________________________________________________________
3263. INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT: RESPONSE TO COURT DECISIONS ON THE NOX
SIP CALL, NOX SIP CALL TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS, AND SECTION 126 RULES
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (Revision)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/21/04 69 FR 21603
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Agency Contact: Jan King
Phone: 919-541-5665
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: king.jan@epamail.epa.gov
Carla Oldham
Phone: 919-541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ16
[[Page 38248]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3264. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES: VOLATILE
ORGANIC LIQUID STORAGE VESSELS; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major under 5 USC 801.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 10/15/03 68 FR 59328
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Mark Morris
Phone: 919-541-5416
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: morris.mark@epamail.epa.gov
Randy Waite
Phone: 919-541-5447
Fax: 919-541-3470
Email: waite.randy@epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ53
_______________________________________________________________________
3265. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER AT STATIONARY SOURCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 Appendix B; 40 CFR 60 Appendix F
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 01/12/04 69 FR 1785
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Dan Bivins
Phone: 919-541-5244
Fax: 919 541-0516
Email: bivins.dan@epamail.epa.gov
Conniesue Oldham
Phone: 919-541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ88
_______________________________________________________________________
3266. NESHAP: MERCURY CELL CHLOR-ALKALI PLANTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/19/03 68 FR 70904
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Iliam Rosario
Phone: 919-541-5308
Fax: 919 541-5308
Email: rosario.iliam@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AE85
_______________________________________________________________________
3267. NESHAP: MISCELLANEOUS METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS (SURFACE COATING)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 01/02/04 69 FR 130
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
Agency Contact: Kim Teal
Phone: 919-541-5580
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: teal.kim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG56
_______________________________________________________________________
3268. NESHAP: LIME MANUFACTURING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 01/05/04 69 FR 394
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Joe Wood
Phone: 919-541-5446
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: wood.joe@epamail.epa.gov
Keith Barnett
Phone: 919-541-5605
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: barnett.keith@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG72
_______________________________________________________________________
3269. NESHAP: SURFACE COATING OF METAL CANS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 11/13/03 68 FR 64433
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Paul Almodovar
Phone: 919-541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG96
_______________________________________________________________________
3270. NESHAP: SURFACE COATING OF AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/26/04 69 FR 22601
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Local, State
Agency Contact: Dave Salman
Phone: 919-541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG99
_______________________________________________________________________
3271. NESHAP: PRIMARY MAGNESIUM REFINING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 10/10/03 68 FR 58615
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
[[Page 38249]]
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Agency Contact: Lula Melton
Phone: 919-541-2910
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: melton.lula@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH03
_______________________________________________________________________
3272. NESHAP: SITE REMEDIATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 10/08/03 68 FR 58172
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Agency Contact: Greg Nizich
Phone: 919-541-3078
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: nizich.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Martha Smith
Phone: 919-541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH12
_______________________________________________________________________
3273. NESHAP: ORGANIC LIQUIDS DISTRIBUTION (NON-GASOLINE)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 02/03/04 69 FR 5038
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Martha Smith
Phone: 919-541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH41
_______________________________________________________________________
3274. NESHAP: TACONITE IRON ORE PROCESSING INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 10/30/03 68 FR 61768
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Agency Contact: Conrad Chin
Phone: 919-541-1512
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: chin.conrad@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh
Phone: 919-541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ02
_______________________________________________________________________
3275. CLARIFICATION TO EXISTING PART 63 NESHAP DELEGATIONS' PROVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 06/23/03 68 FR 37334
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: Tom Driscoll
Phone: 919-541-5135
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: driscoll.tom@epamail.epa.gov
Robin Segall
Phone: 919-541-0893
Fax: 919 541-0896
Email: segall.robin@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ26
_______________________________________________________________________
3276. NESHAP: GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES--AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart R
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/19/03 68 FR 70960
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Steve Shedd
Phone: 919-541-5397
Fax: 919 685-3195
Email: shedd.steve@epamail.epa.gov
Martha Smith
Phone: 919-541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ42
_______________________________________________________________________
3277. BENZENE WASTE OPERATIONS NESHAP; AMENDMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/04/03 68 FR 67932
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Bob Lucas
Phone: 919-541-0884
Fax: 919-541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epamail.epa.gov
Kent Hustvedt
Phone: 919-541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ87
_______________________________________________________________________
3278. NESHAP: CHLORINE PRODUCTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/19/03 68 FR 70949
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Iliam Rosario
Phone: 919-541-5308
Fax: 919 541-5308
Email: rosario.iliam@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Fruh
Phone: 919-541-2837
[[Page 38250]]
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK38
_______________________________________________________________________
3279. NESHAP: PERCHLORETHYLENE DRY CLEANING FACILITIES (COMPLETION OF A
SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412; 5 USC 610
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On September 22, 1993 (58 FR 49354), EPA promulgated
standards to control perchlorethylene emissions from drycleaning
facilities under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. (See 40 CFR part 63,
subpart M). Pursuant to Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
EPA has reviewed this rule to determine if it should be continued
without change, or should be amended or rescinded, to minimize adverse
economic impacts on small entities. The full results of EPA's review
have been summarized in a reportand placed in docket number OAR-2003-
0029 in EPA's electronic docket system (www.epa.gov/edocket). These
results are briefly summarized here.
EPA has concluded that there is continued need for this rule to protect
public health by reducing harmful perchloroethylene (PCE) emissions as
mandated by Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. EPA's review also
addressed the following issues: complaints received, complexity,
duplication and overlap. Regarding complaints, several commenters urged
EPA tomake the rule more stringent to further reduce or eliminate PCE
use. The Agency is currently addressing these kinds of considerations
as part of its review of the NESHAP under Clean Air Act Sections
112(d)(6) and 112(f), and therefore will not address these issues
further here.
A number of commenters cited recordkeeping burdens, but some also
acknowledged that the requirements promote efficiency and are
consistent with good business practices. Other commenters note that
while recordkeeping does impose some paperwork burden, they do not
believe it translates into significant economic cost. Another commenter
proposed ways to lessen monitoring and recordkeeping burden. The Agency
finds that revising the requirements as proposed by the commenters may
lead to increased PCE emissions and may fail to demonstrate continued
compliance.
The Agency also found that the rule's complexity is necessary to
minimize economic impacts on small businesses while ensuring emissions
reductions. The Agency received no comments requesting simplification
of the rule requirements. EPA therefore finds that revisions to the
NESHAP based on rule complexity are not necessary.
The extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with
other Federal, State, or local government rules was also assessed as
part of this review. The Agency is not aware of any instance where the
NESHAP conflicts with state, local, or other requirements, and received
no comments to that effect.
Finally, the Agency must consider the degree to which technology,
economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area of the
rule. As noted above, although the Agency finds that no revisions to
the NESHAP are necessary for the purpose of this RFA review, the Agency
will continue to assess advances in technology as part of the ongoing
review of the NESHAP that is required by section 112(d)(6) of the Clean
Air Act.
In light of the considerations outlined above, EPA has decided to
continue this rule in effect without change. A fuller explanation of
the results of this review is given in the aforementioned report which
has been placed in the docket established for this review.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Begin Review 06/01/03
End Review 10/01/03
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4785.
Agency Contact: Tom Eagles, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6103A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-1952
Email: eagles.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK64
_______________________________________________________________________
3280. FEDERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SOLID
WASTE INCINERATION UNITS CONSTRUCTED ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 30, 1999
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 10/03/03 68 FR 57518
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Agency Contact: David Painter
Phone: 919-541-5515
Fax: 919 541-2664
Email: painter.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ28
_______________________________________________________________________
3281. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM HIGHWAY MOTORCYCLES
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 94
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 01/15/04 69 FR 2398
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Roberts French
Phone: 734-214-4380
Fax: 734 214-4050
Email: french.roberts@epamail.epa.gov
Glenn Passavant
Phone: 734-214-4408
Email: passavant.glenn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ90
_______________________________________________________________________
3282. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: BAN ON TRADE OF METHYL BROMIDE
TO NON-PARTIES TO THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 07/25/03 68 FR 43930
[[Page 38251]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Tom Land
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
Kate Choban
Phone: 202-343-9337
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: choban.kate@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK67
_______________________________________________________________________
3283. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: SUPPLEMENTAL RULE REGARDING A
RECYCLING STANDARD UNDER SECTION 608
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82(F)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 07/24/03 68 FR 43786
Final Action-Correction 09/18/03 68 FR 54677
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Julius Banks
Phone: 202-343-9870
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF36
_______________________________________________________________________
3284. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: REFRIGERANT RECYCLING;
SUBSTITUTE REFRIGERANTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82(F)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 03/12/04 69 FR 11946
Final Action Effective 05/11/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Julius Banks
Phone: 202-343-9870
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AF37
_______________________________________________________________________
3285. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: RECONSIDERATION OF SECTION 608
SALES RESTRICTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82(F)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn 05/14/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Julius Banks
Phone: 202-343-9870
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Land
Phone: 202-343-9185
Fax: 202-565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AG20
_______________________________________________________________________
3286. COMPILATION OF SOURCE-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVE METHODS BEING APPROVED
FOR SOURCE-CATEGORY WIDE APPLICATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 00 CFR NYD
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn 05/21/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Rima Howell
Phone: 919-541-0443
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: howell.rima@epamail.epa.gov
Conniesue Oldham
Phone: 919-541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ84
_______________________________________________________________________
3287. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR VEHICLES; ADDENDUM TO
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TIER 2/GASOLINE SULFUR REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80; 40 CFR 86
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule 06/12/02 67 FR 40169
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Mary Manners
Phone: 734-214-4873
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: manners.mary@epamail.epa.gov
Robin Moran
Phone: 734-214-4781
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: moran.robin@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK63
_______________________________________________________________________
3288. AMENDMENT TO MARINE DIESEL RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 94
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 09/19/03 68 FR 54956
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Agency Contact: Karl Simon
Phone: 202-564-1106
Email: simon.karl@epamail.epa.gov
Alan Stout
Phone: 734-214-4805
Fax: 734-214-4834
Email: stout.alan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL81
[[Page 38252]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3289. REVISIONS TO FEDERAL OPERATING PERMITS PROGRAM FEE PAYMENT
DEADLINES FOR CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL SOURCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 42 CFR 71.9(f)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule 06/27/03 68 FR 38197
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State
Agency Contact: Candace Carraway
Phone: 919-541-3189
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: carraway.candace@epamail.epa.gov
David Wampler
Phone: 415-972-3975
Fax: 415-947-3579
Email: wampler.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL82
_______________________________________________________________________
3290. AMENDMENTS TO THE PHASE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR SPARK-IGNITION NONROAD
ENGINES LESS THAN 19 KILOWATTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 90 (Revision)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/12/04 69 FR 1836
Direct Final Rule 01/12/04 69 FR 1824
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Philip Carlson
Phone: 734-214-4270
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: carlson.philip@epamail.epa.gov
Glenn Passavant
Phone: 734-214-4408
Email: passavant.glenn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL88
_______________________________________________________________________
3291. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ALLOCATION OF ESSENTIAL USE
ALLOWANCES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2004
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.4
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/28/03 68 FR 61382
Final Action 01/28/04 69 FR 4059
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Scott Monroe
Phone: 202-343-9712
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: monroe.scott@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AM01
_______________________________________________________________________
3292. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR ANDERSEN CORPORATION'S
FACILITY IN BAYPORT, MINNESOTA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn 03/12/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Brian Barwick
Phone: 312-886-6620
Email: barwick.brian@epamail.epa.gov
David Beck
Phone: 919-541-5421
Email: beck.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA21
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3293. ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR THE DISPOSAL OF
LOW-ACTIVITY MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 2021 ``Atomic Energy Act of 1954'';
``Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970''; ``Nuclear Waste Policy Act of
1982''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 193
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking would address the problem of disposal of low-
activity mixed radioactive wastes, consisting of a chemically hazardous
component and low levels of radioactivity. These wastes are anticipated
to arise in the commercial sector from various sources. The rulemaking
is intended to increase disposal options for these wastes and offer a
streamlined regulatory process which melds hazardous chemical
protection and radioactivity protection requirements while protecting
public health and safety. The rule would not mandate a disposal method,
but rather would permit an alternative to existing disposal methods.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is anticipated to be the
implementing Agency for the application of this rule. An Advanced
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is being issued to solicit early public
input on this issue -- see SAN 4054.1 elsewhere in this issue of the
Regulatory Agenda.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 11/18/03 68 FR 65120
NPRM 01/00/05
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4054.
Agency Contact: Daniel Schultheisz, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9349
Fax: 202 343-2304
Email: schultheisz.daniel@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH63
[[Page 38253]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3294. REVISION OF THE 40 CFR PART 194 WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT
COMPLIANCE CRITERIA
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: ``106 Stat. 4777 as amended by the 1996 LWA
Amendments''; PL 102-579; PL 104-201; ``Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Land Withdrawal Act of 1992''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 194.8(b)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is finalizing several alternative provisions to the
compliance criteria in 40 CFR Part 194: (1) addition of a process for
making minor changes to the provisions of the Compliance Criteria
(194.6); (2) changes to the approval process for waste characterization
programs at the Department of Energy transuranic (TRU) waste sites
(194.8(b)); (3) changes to allow for submission of compliance
applications and reference materials in alternative format (e.g.,
compact disk) (194.12 & 194.13); and replacement of the term ``process
knowledge'' with ``acceptable knowledge''. The second item is the most
significant change. Section 194.8(b) requires EPA to inspect TRU waste
sites on a waste stream basis, and to initiate a notice-and-comment
process for each inspection. If a site receives our approval to ship a
single waste stream or group of waste streams, that site cannot ship a
different waste stream until we perform an additional 194.8(b)
inspection. Based on actual site inspection experience, we have learned
that for regulatory purposes emphasis is better placed on the processes
used to characterize the wastes streams rather than on the particular
waste streams themselves. Also, we had witnessed DOE's capacity to
properly characterize numerous waste streams at different waste
generator sites. On this basis, we are proposing to alter the waste
characterization approval process so that only one approval would be
issued per site. EPA will assign reporting requirements for waste
characterization activities and specify any limitations that would
necessitate additional inspections. The purpose of the revisions to
194.8(b) is to achieve process and resources efficiencies while
maintaining our confidence in DOE's technical capability to
characterize wastes destined for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/09/02 67 FR 51929
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4403.
Agency Contact: Ray Lee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4625
Fax: 202 343-2305
Email: lee.ray@epamail.epa.gov
Betsy Forinash, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6602J, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9233
Email: forinash.betsy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AJ07
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3295. TECHNICAL CHANGE TO DOSE METHODOLOGY FOR 40 CFR PART 190, SUBPART
B AND 40 CFR 191, SUBPART A
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 2021 ``Atomic Energy Act of 1954'';
``Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970''; ``Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 190(B); 40 CFR 191(A)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The purpose of this action is to make a technical change to
the dose methodology used in subpart A of 40 CFR 191, entitled
Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Management and
Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Waste and Transuranic Waste
The current methodology is outdated. The dose methodology used in the
rule published on September 19, 1985, was based on the target organ
approach recommended by the International Commission on Radiological
Protection (ICRP) in Report [greek-i]2. Since that time science has
progressed and a new methodology based on an effective dose equivalent
approach is currently being recommended by the ICRP in Report
[greek-i]26. This action would update the 40 CFR 191, subpart A dose
limits published in 1985 from the target organ to the state-of-the-art
effective dose equivalent system. There would be no change in the level
of protection, just the scientific methodology for determining
compliance with the levels of protection established in 1985.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4003.
Agency Contact: Ray Clark, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9198
Fax: 202 343-2065
Email: clark.ray@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AH90
_______________________________________________________________________
3296. APPROACHES TO AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
OF LOW-ACTIVITY RADIOACTIVE WASTE: REQUEST FOR COMMENT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 2021 ``Atomic Energy Act of 1954'';
``Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970''; ``Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 193
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) will
solicit public comment on voluntary approaches that would allow
additional options for the disposal of low-activity mixed wastes. The
wastes intended to be disposed of in these cells are Federally-
regulated mixed wastes, consisting of a chemically hazardous component
and low levels of
[[Page 38254]]
radioactivity. These wastes are anticipated to arise in the commercial
sector from various sources, but may also be generated by Federal
government activities. The intention of this effort is to increase
disposal options for these wastes and offer a streamlined regulatory
process which melds hazardous chemical protection and radioactivity
protection requirements while protecting public health and safety. It
is envisioned that any rule that would be promulgated in this area
would not mandate a disposal method, but rather permit an alternative
to existing disposal methods. (See SAN 4054 elsewhere in today's
Regulatory Agenda.) In this ANPRM, public comment will be solicited on
application of such a rule to other low-activity radioactive wastes not
currently regulated at the Federal level, and on possible non-
regulatory approaches to improved management. The U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission is anticipated to be the implementing Agency for
the application of any rule that would follow this ANPRM.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 11/18/03 68 FR 65120
ANPRM Comment Period Extended 03/12/04 69 FR 11826
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4054.1. Split from RIN 2060-AH63.
Agency Contact: Daniel Schultheisz, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-343-9349
Fax: 202 343-2304
Email: schultheisz.daniel@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AL78
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3297. WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT (WIPP) FY 2001 REPORT TO CONGRESS
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 194
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Report to Congress 04/20/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Raymond Lee
Phone: 202-343-9463
Fax: 202 343-2305
Email: lee.raymond@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AK39
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3298. ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR SCREENING PROGRAM (EDSP); CHEMICAL SELECTION
APPROACH FOR INITIAL ROUND OF SCREENING
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA''; 21 USC 346(a) ``FFDCA''; 42 USC
300(a)(17) ``SDWA''; 7 USC 136 ``FIFRA''
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA published a proposed policy statement in the Federal
Register setting forth the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program on
December 28, 1998. In that FR Notice, the Agency described the major
elements of the Program EPA had developed to comply with the
requirements of FFDCA section 408(p) as amended by FQPA. One of those
elements is Priority Setting which was defined as the collection,
evaluation, and analysis of relevant information to determine the
general order in which chemical substances and mixtures will be
subjected to screening and testing. Under this current action, EPA is
developing a priority setting approach to be used by the Agency to
identify the initial list of chemicals for which Tier 1 testing will be
required. On December 30, 2002, EPA published in the Federal Register
for public comment a proposed chemical selection approach for this
initial list of chemicals. The public comment period on this proposed
approach was extended to April 1, 2003 in a Federal Register notice
dated February 26, 2003. Following consideration of comments on this
proposed approach, EPA will issue a Federal Register notice setting
forth its final approach. Although this action is not a rulemaking, the
Agency has included it in the Regulatory Agenda to help inform the public.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice: Proposed Approach 12/30/02 67 FR 79611
Notice: Final Approach 01/00/05
Notice: Draft Initial List 02/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4727. Split from RIN 2070-AD26.
Agency Contact: Mary Belefski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7201M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8461
Fax: 202-564-8452
Email: belefski.mary@epamail.epa.gov
Gary Timm, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7201M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8474
Fax: 202 564-8482
[[Page 38255]]
Email: timm.gary@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD59
_______________________________________________________________________
3299. PESTICIDE WORKER PROTECTION RULE (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 7 USC 135
CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 156; 40 CFR Part 170
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On August 21, 1992, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
issued final revisions to the Worker Protection Standards governing the
protection of workers from agricultural pesticides. These revised
regulations expand the scope of the standards to include not only
workers performing hand labor operations in fields treated with
pesticides, but employees in forests, nurseries, and greenhouses and
employees who handle (mix, load, apply, etc.) pesticides for use in
these locations. The revised regulations became effective January 1,
1995, and are applicable to agricultural farm workers and pesticide
handlers working on farms, forests, nurseries, and greenhouses. In 1995
and 1996, the standard was amended to address specific concerns of the
regulation community. EPA is reviewing this regulation pursuant to
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 USC 610). The purpose
of this review is to determine whether the rule should be continued
without change, or should be amended or rescinded, to minimize economic
impacts on small entities while still complying with the provisions of
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). EPA has
already solicited comment on the continued need for the rule; the
complexity of the rule; the extent to which it overlaps, duplicates, or
conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government rules; and the
degree to which technology, economic conditions or other relevant
factors have changed since the rule was promulgated. We expect to
announce the completion of this review and report its outcome in 2004.
See EPA Docket ID number OPP-2003-0115 at www.epa.gov/edocket.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 1 08/21/92 57 FR 38102
Begin Review 05/27/03 68 FR 30942
Comment Period End 12/22/03 68 FR 73543
End Review 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4789.
Sectors Affected: 111 Crop Production; 1114 Greenhouse, Nursery and
Floriculture Production; 115 Support Activities for Agriculture and
Forestry; 1131 Timber Tract Operations
Agency Contact: Donald Eckerman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-5062
Email: eckerman.donald@epamail.epa.gov
Kathy Davis, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-7002
Email: davis.kathy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD66
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3300. PESTICIDES; DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONAL CHEMICALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) to 136(y)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will propose revisions to its data requirements for the
registration of conventional pesticide products. In this action, the
Agency is proposing revisions to the data requirements that pertain to
product chemistry, toxicology, residue chemistry, applicator exposure,
post-application exposure, nontarget terrestrial and aquatic organisms,
nontarget plant protection, and environmental fate. The proposed data
requirements reflect current scientific knowledge and understanding.
These revisions will improve the Agency's ability to make regulatory
decisions about the human health and environmental effects of pesticide
products to better protect wildlife, the environment, and people,
including sensitive subpopulations. Couple with revision data
requirements, EPA proposes to reformat the requirements and revise its
general procedures and policies associated with data submission. By
codifying existing data requirements which are currently applied on a
case-by-case basis, the pesticide industry, along with other partners
in the regulated community, would attain a better understanding and
could better prepare for the pesticide registration process. EPA
intends to propose a series of revisions to the data requirements,
covering different data disciplines and product types.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 2687.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Melissa Chun, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-305-4027
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: chun.melissa@epamail.epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
[[Page 38256]]
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC12
_______________________________________________________________________
3301. PESTICIDES; DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTIMICROBIALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) to 136(y)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will update and revise its pesticide data requirements
for antimicrobial products. The data requirements specify the data that
are required for EPA to evaluate the registrability of a pesticide
product. The revisions will also clarify the data requirements for all
antimicrobials to reflect current practice.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4173.
Sectors Affected: 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 32551
Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 32561 Soap and Cleaning Compound
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Paul Parsons, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-308-9073
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: parsons.paul@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD30
_______________________________________________________________________
3302. ENDOCRINE DISRUPTER SCREENING PROGRAM (EDSP); IMPLEMENTING THE
SCREENING AND TESTING PHASE
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA''; 21 USC 346(a) ``FFDCA''; 42 USC
300(a)(17) ``SDWA''; 7 USC 136 ``FIFRA''
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The screening and testing phase of the Endocrine Disruptor
Screening Program (EDSP) potentially will encompass a broad range of
types of chemicals, including pesticide chemicals, TSCA chemicals,
chemicals that may be found in sources of drinking water, chemicals
that may have an effect that is cumulative to the effect of a pesticide
chemical, chemicals that are both pesticide chemicals and TSCA
chemicals, and other chemicals that are combinations of these types of
chemicals. EPA is developing the procedures and processes that the
Agency will use when implementing the screening and testing phase of
the EDSP. Specifically, depending on decisions that the Agency makes
regarding implementation of the testing phase of the EDSP, the action
will describe the authorities that EPA may invoke to require testing by
the chemical manufacturers and pesticide registrants and, if necessary,
establish the process that the Agency will use to require the testing.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Policy/NPRM 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4728. Split from RIN 2070-AD26. In August
2000, the Agency submitted the required Status Report to Congress. In
March 2002, the Agency submitted the requested status report to
Congress on the Endocrine Disruptor Methods Validation subcommittee
under the National Advisory Council on Environmental Policy and
Technology.
Agency Contact: Jane--Scott Smith, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7201M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8476
Fax: 202-564-8483
Email: smith.jane-scott@epamail.epa.gov
Joe Nash, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8886
Fax: 202-564-4765
Email: nash.joseph@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD61
_______________________________________________________________________
3303. PESTICIDES; PROCEDURES FOR THE REGISTRATION REVIEW PROGRAM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a (g); 7 USC 136w
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency will establish procedures to implement section
3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
which provides for periodic review of pesticide registrations. The goal
of these regulations is to review a pesticide's registration every 15
years.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 04/26/00 65 FR 24586
NPRM 02/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4170.
Sectors Affected: 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
32551 Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 32532 Pesticide and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 32561 Soap and Cleaning Compound
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Vivian Prunier, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-308-9341
Fax: 703 308-5884
Email: prunier.vivian@epamail.epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD29
_______________________________________________________________________
3304. PESTICIDES; EMERGENCY EXEMPTION PROCESS REVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136p; 7 USC 136w
[[Page 38257]]
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 166
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the
Federal Register proposing several improvements to the pesticide
emergency exemption process under section 18 of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Two of these
potential improvements are currently being tested through a limited
pilot, and are based on recommendations from the States which are the
primary applicants for emergency exemptions. EPA has established
regulations under section 18 of FIFRA which allow a Federal or State
agency to apply for an emergency exemption to allow an unregistered use
of a pesticide for a limited time when such use is necessary to
alleviate an emergency condition.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice: Limited Pilot 04/24/03 68 FR 20145
NPRM 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4216.
Sectors Affected: 9241 Administration of Environmental Quality Programs
Agency Contact: Joe Hogue, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-308-9072
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: hogue.joe@epamail.epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD36
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3305. PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL; STANDARDS FOR PESTICIDE
CONTAINERS AND CONTAINMENT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(q) ``FIFRA sec 19''; 7 USC 136(a) ``FIFRA
sec 3''; 7 USC 136(w) ``FIFRA sec 25''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 156; 40 CFR 165
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 24, 1991, -.
Abstract: FIFRA sec. 19 gives EPA authority to regulate the management
of pesticides and their containers, including storage, transportation
and disposal. As proposed, this rule would establish standards for
removal of pesticides from containers and for rinsing containers;
facilitate the safe use, refill, reuse, and disposal of pesticide
containers by establishing standards for container design, labeling and
refilling; and establish requirements for containment of stationary
bulk containers and for containment of pesticide dispensing areas.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM original 02/11/94 59 FR 6712
Supp NPRM 1 10/21/99 64 FR 56918
Supp NPRM 2 12/21/99 64 FR 71368
Notice: Reopen Comment Period 06/00/04
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 2659.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing; 11511 Support Activities for Crop Production; 42291 Farm
Supplies Wholesalers
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/containers.htm
Agency Contact: Nancy Fitz, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-305-7385
Fax: 703 308-3259
Email: fitz.nancy@epamail.epa.gov
Jude Andreasen, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-9342
Fax: 703-308-3259
Email: andreasen.jude@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB95
_______________________________________________________________________
3306. WPS; PESTICIDE WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD (WPS); GLOVE AMENDMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(w)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 170
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This final rule would create greater flexibility in
requirements of the 1992 Worker Protection Standard related to the use
of gloves by workers and applicators.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/09/97 62 FR 47544
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3731.
Sectors Affected: 111 Crop Production; 1114 Greenhouse, Nursery and
Floriculture Production; 1131 Timber Tract Operations; 115 Support
Activities for Agriculture and Forestry
Agency Contact: Nancy Vogel, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-305-6475
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: vogel.nancy@epamail.epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC93
[[Page 38258]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3307. PESTICIDES; REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTIMICROBIAL PESTICIDE
PRODUCTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a)(h); 7 USC 136(w)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 15, 2000, The Final Rule is
due 240 days after close of comment period.
Abstract: This regulation will specify antimicrobial registration
reforms that will reduce to the extent possible the review time for
antimicrobial pesticides. The regulation will clarify criteria for
completeness of applications, and will specify or refer to a definition
of the various classes of antimicrobial pesticide use patterns and the
associated data and labeling requirements that would be consistent with
the degree and type of risk presented by each class. In addition, the
regulation will also include labeling standards for public health
antimicrobial products.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/17/99 64 FR 50671
Notice 11/16/99 64 FR 62145
Final Original 12/14/01 66 FR 64759
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3892.
Sectors Affected: 32519 Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 32551
Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 32561 Soap and Cleaning Compound
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
Cleo Pizana, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7510C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-6431
Email: pizana.cleo@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD14
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3308. PESTICIDES; DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR BIOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIAL
PRODUCTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA will update the data requirements necessary to register a
biochemical or microbial pesticide product. The revisions will codify
data requirements to reflect current regulatory and scientific
standards. The data requirements will cover all scientific disciplines
for biochemical and microbial pesticides, including product chemistry
and residue chemistry, toxicology and environmental fate and effects.
The revision will not include plant incorporated protectants.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4596.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Candace Brassard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-6598
Fax: 703 305-5884
Email: brassard.candace@epamail.epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD51
_______________________________________________________________________
3309. PESTICIDES; TOLERANCE PROCESSING FEES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In 1996, the Food Quality Protection Act amended the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require EPA to charge tolerance fees
that, in the aggregate, will cover all costs associated with processing
tolerance actions, including filing a tolerance petition, and
establishing, modifying, leaving in effect, or revoking a tolerance or
tolerance exemption. This rule would have adjusted the fee structure
and fee amounts for tolerance actions. However, under the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of2004, signed on January 23, 2004, EPA is
prohibited from collecting any tolerances fees until September 30,
2008. Accordingly, this rule will not be issued.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/09/99 64 FR 31039
Supplemental NPRM 07/24/00 65 FR 45569
Supplemental NPRM 2 08/31/00 65 FR 52979
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4027.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD23
[[Page 38259]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3310. PESTICIDE TOLERANCE REASSESSMENT PROGRAM
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) to 346(q)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, August 3, 2006, See additional
information.
Abstract: EPA will reassess pesticide tolerances and exemptions for raw
and processed foods established prior to August 3, 1996, to determine
whether they meet the reasonable certainty of no harm standard of the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). FFDCA sec. 408(q), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). FQPA requires that
EPA conduct this reassessment on a phased 10-year schedule. Based on
its reassessment, EPA will take a series of regulatory actions to
modify or revoke tolerances. Since such actions are issued on a
chemical-by-chemical basis, this regulatory plan entry does not list
the individual actions that are likely to occur under this program. For
status information about the individual chemicals, go to http://
www.epa.gov/pesticides.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 08/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4175. LEGAL DEADLINE CONT: EPA is required
to complete reassessments on a phased schedule of: 33% by August 3;
1999; 66% by August 3; 2002; and 100% by August 3; 2006. The Agency
will continue to assess pesticide tolerances throughout each year.
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Robert McNally, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7508C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-308-8085
Fax: 703 308-8041
Email: mcnally.robert@epamail.epa.gov
Joseph Nevola, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7508C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8037
Email: nevola.joseph@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD24
_______________________________________________________________________
3311. PLANT INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS (PIPS); EXEMPTION FOR THOSE BASED
ON VIRAL COAT PROTEINS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) et seq; 7 USC 136 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering the addition of plant-incorporated
protectants based on viral coat proteins to its plant-incorporated
protectants exemptions at 40 CFR 174. Substances which plants produce
for protection against pests, and the genetic material necessary to
produce them, are pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), if humans intend these substances to
``prevent, repel or mitigate any pest''. These substances are also
``pesticide chemical residues'' under theFederal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). Therefore, EPA is concurrently considering the
exemption of plant-incorporated protectants based on viral coat
proteins from the requirement of a tolerance under section 408 of the
FFDCA. Due to public interest and new scientific information,
additional public comment on this proposal, originally published in
1994, was requested in a 2001 Supplemental Proposal (66 FR 37855).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/23/94 59 FR 60496
Supp NPRM 1 07/22/96 61 FR 37891
Supp NPRM 2 05/16/97 62 FR 27132
Supp NPRM-RCAN 04/23/99 64 FR 19958
Final Resubmittal 07/19/01 66 FR 37855
Final Action 10/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4602. This action is a continuation of the
action described in RIN 2070-AC02. Since several pieces of that action
are now finalized, the Agency is splitting this piece into a separate
Agenda entry so that it can continue to be tracked separately.
Sectors Affected: 111 Crop Production; 32532 Pesticide and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 54171 Research and Development in
the Physical Sciences and Engineering Sciences
Agency Contact: Melissa Kramer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7202M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8497
Fax: 202 564-8502
Email: kramer.melissa@epamail.epa.gov
Tom McClintock, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7202M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8488
Fax: 202-564-8502
Email: mcclintock.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD49
_______________________________________________________________________
3312. PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS (PIPS); EXEMPTION FOR THOSE DERIVED
THROUGH GENETIC ENGINEERING FROM SEXUALLY COMPATIBLE PLANTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq; 21 USC 346a et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering the addition of plant-incorporated
protectants derived through genetic engineering from sexually
compatible plants to its plant-incorporated protectants exemptions at
40 CFR 174. Substances which plants produce for protection against
pests, and the genetic material necessary to produce them, are
pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), if humans intend these substances to ``prevent, repel or
mitigate any pest''. These substances are also ``pesticide chemical
residues`` under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
Therefore, EPA is concurrently considering the exemption of plant-
incorporated protectants derived through genetic engineering from
sexually compatible plants from the requirement of a tolerance under
section 408 of the
[[Page 38260]]
FFDCA. Due to public interest and new scientific information,
additional public comment on this proposal, originally published in
1994, was requested in a recent Supplemental Proposal (66 FR 37855).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/23/94 59 FR 60496
Supp NPRM 1 07/22/96 61 FR 37891
Supp NPRM 2 05/16/97 62 FR 27132
Supp NPRM 3 04/23/99 64 FR 19958
Supp NPRM 4 07/19/01 66 FR 37855
Supp NPRM 5 08/20/01 66 FR 43552
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4611.
This action is a continuation of the action described in RIN 2070-AC02.
Since several pieces of that action are now finalized, the Agency is
splitting this piece into a separate Agenda entry so that it can
continue to be tracked separately.
Sectors Affected: 111 Crop Production; 32532 Pesticide and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 54171 Research and Development in
the Physical Sciences and Engineering Sciences
Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7202M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8492
Fax: 202 564-8501
Email: milewski.elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov
Janet Andersen, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7511C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8712
Fax: 703 308-7026
Email: andersen.janet@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD55
_______________________________________________________________________
3313. PLANT INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS (PIPS); EXEMPTION FOR PIPS THAT ACT
BY PRIMARILY AFFECTING THE PLANT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq; 21 USC 346a et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 174
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering the addition of plant-incorporated
protectants that act by primarily affecting the plant to its plant-
incorporated protectants exemptions at 40 CFR 174. Substances which
plants produce for protection against pests, and the genetic material
necessary to produce them, are pesticides under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), if humans intend
these substances to ``prevent, repel or mitigate any pest''. Due to
public interest and new scientific information, additional public
comment on this proposal, originally published in 1994, was requested
in a recent Supplemental Proposal (66 FR 37855).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Original 11/23/94 59 FR 60496
Supplemental NPRM 07/22/96 61 FR 37891
Supp NPRM 1 05/16/97 62 FR 27132
Supp NPRM 2 04/23/99 64 FR 19958
Supp NPRM 3 07/19/01 66 FR 37855
NPRM To Be Determined
Final FFDCA To Be Determined
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4612. This action is a continuation of the
action described in RIN 2070-AC02. Since several pieces of that action
are now finalized, the Agency is splitting this piece into a separate
Agenda entry so that it can continue to be tracked separately.
Sectors Affected: 111 Crop Production; 32532 Pesticide and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 54171 Research and Development in
the Physical Sciences and Engineering Sciences
Agency Contact: Elizabeth Milewski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7202M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8492
Fax: 202 564-8501
Email: milewski.elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov
Janet Andersen, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7511C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8712
Fax: 703 308-7026
Email: andersen.janet@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD56
_______________________________________________________________________
3314. ACCEPTABILITY OF RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 301; 7 USC 136a; 7 USC 136w; 15 USC 2603; 21 USC
346a; 42 USC 300v-1(b); 42 USC 7601; 33 USC 1361; 42 USC 9615; 42 USC
11048; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 300j-9
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 26 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is evaluating its current policy with respect to the
protection of human research subjects in testing not conducted or
supported by the Federal government. Current EPA regulations in 40 CFR
part 26 apply to research conducted or supported by the Agency or
``otherwise subject to regulation.'' No action has been taken yet to
give effect to the ``otherwise subject to regulation'' phrase. In
addition, EPA has asked for and received the advice of the National
Academy of Sciences (NAS) on several issues surrounding the
acceptability and interpretation of third party studies involving
deliberate dosing of human subjects for the purpose of defining or
quantifying toxic endpoints. EPA will seek public comment on issues
related to Agency use of human research data in its regulatory
decisionmaking. EPA believes the process being initiated will serve two
important Agency goals: ensuring the availability of sound and
appropriate scientific data in its decisions, and protection of the
rights andsafety of human research subjects. EPA may issue one or more
documents, which may include policy statements, rulemaking or requests
for public comment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 05/07/03 68 FR 24410
Notice/NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4610.
[[Page 38261]]
Sectors Affected: 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: William Jordan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7501C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-305-1049
Fax: 703-308-4776
Email: jordan.william@epamail.epa.gov
John Carley, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7501C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-7019
Fax: 703-305-5060
Email: carley.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD57
_______________________________________________________________________
3315. REVISION OF PROCEDURAL RULES FOR HEARINGS ON CANCELLATIONS,
SUSPENSIONS, CHANGES IN CLASSIFICATIONS, AND DENIALS OF PESTICIDE
REGISTRATIONS
Priority: Economically Significant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a(c) to 136a(d); 7 USC 136b(d) to 136b(f); 7
USC 136d(b) to 7 USC 136d(e); 7 USC 136w(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 164 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is preparing a comprehensive revision of the Rules of
Practice governing the conduct of licensing adjudications under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The
existing Rules of Practice were originally promulgated by EPA in 1973.
In the subsequent 30 years, Congress has substantially amended FIFRA,
creating a number of additional types of licensing adjudications which
are not expressly provided for in the existing Rules of Practice. In
order to include provisionstailored to these new types of proceedings,
and to incorporate the standard practices which have evolved and the
precedents which have been established since these rules were first
promulgated, EPA intends to comprehensively revise the FIFRA Rules of
Practice.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4618.
Sectors Affected: 112 Animal Production; 111 Crop Production; 32532
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Scott Garrison, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2333A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4047
Fax: 202 564-5644
Email: garrison.scott@epamail.epa.gov
Robert Perlis, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance, 2333A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5636
Fax: 202 564-5644
Email: perlis.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2020-AA44
_______________________________________________________________________
3316. GROUNDWATER AND PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN RULE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) ``FIFRA sec 3''; 7 USC 136(w)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.170
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulation as proposed would establish Pesticide
Management Plans (PMPs) as a new regulatory requirement for certain
pesticides. Unless a State or tribal authority had an EPA-approved Plan
specifying risk-reduction measures, use of the chemical would be
prohibited. The rule would also specify procedures and deadlines for
development, approval and modification of plans by States and tribal
authorities. Several parameters of the program described in the
proposed rule are being reconsidered to determine whether the program
can address water quality issues rather than ground-water only, and to
determine the best partnership approach to implementation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/26/96 61 FR 33259
Notice 02/23/00 65 FR 8925
Supplemental NPRM 03/24/00 65 FR 15885
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3222.
Sectors Affected: 9241 Administration of Environmental Quality Programs
Agency Contact: Arty Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-305-5239
Fax: 703 308-3259
Email: williams.arty@epamail.epa.gov
Jean Frane, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7506C, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-305-5944
Email: frane.jean@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC46
_______________________________________________________________________
3317. PESTICIDES; EXEMPTION OF MEDICAL DEVICES TREATED WITH
ANTIMICROBIAL PESTICIDES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 7 USC 136a; 7 USC 136w
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152.20
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will exempt from the requirements of FIFRA
medical devices treated with antimicrobial pesticides. EPA has
determined that these treated medical devices are adequately regulated
by the Food and Drug Administration. This action would eliminate dual
regulation of these products by EPA and FDA. EPA would continue to
regulate the antimicrobial pesticide used to treat the medical device.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
[[Page 38262]]
Additional Information: SAN 4609.
Sectors Affected: 32619 Other Plastics Product Manufacturing; 31499 All
Other Textile Product Mills
Agency Contact: Melba Morrow, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7510C, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 703-308-2716
Fax: 703 308-8481
Email: morrow.melba@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD54
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3318. VOLUNTARY CHILDREN'S CHEMICAL EVALUATION PROGRAM (VCCEP)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq (TSCA)
CFR Citation: None
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This is a voluntary program to evaluate commercial chemicals
to which children may have a high likelihood of exposure. Designed with
extensive stakeholder participation, the purpose of this voluntary
program is to obtain toxicity and exposure data needed to assess the
risk of childhood exposure to commercial chemicals. EPA launched a
pilot of this program on December 26, 2000. Manufacturers of 20 of the
23 pilot chemicals have volunteered to sponsor their chemicals in tier
1 in the pilot. A workshop was held in December 2001 to provide
sponsors with additional guidance on the scope and content of the
exposure assessments they will prepare. A peer consultation process is
being used to evaluate the scientific merits of the hazard, exposure,
and risk assessments submitted by sponsors. Assessments for six
chemicals have been evaluated in the peer consultation process.
Information on VCCEP and the chemical assessments submitted to date are
available to the public at www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep1. Although not
currently involving a rulemaking, EPA has included this pilot program
in the Regulatory Agenda to inform the public about activities like
this related to its chemical testing program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice Announcing VCCEP & Pilot 12/26/00 65 FR 81700
Notice of Public Review 12/00/04
Notice: Status of Pilot 01/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4876.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/chemrtk/vccep
Agency Contact: Ward Penberthy, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, 7405M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8171
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: penberthy.ward@epamail.epa.gov
Catherine Roman, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8172
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: roman.catherine@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC27
_______________________________________________________________________
3319. LEAD; REQUIREMENTS FOR LEAD-BASED PAINT ACTIVITIES IN TARGET
HOUSING AND CHILD-OCCUPIED FACILITIES (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: TSCA 402/404; 15 USC 2682; 15 USC 2684
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 subpart L; 40 CFR 745 subpart Q
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In August, 1996, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
promulgated regulations under section 402 of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) to ensure that individuals conducting lead-based
paint activities in target housing and child-occupied facilities are
properly trained and certified, that training programs providing
instruction in such activities are accredited and that these activities
are conducted according to reliable, effective and safe work practice
standards. EPA also finalizeda Federal regulation under section 404 of
TSCA that allows States and Indian Tribes to seek authorization to
administer and enforce the regulations developed under section 402 for
the training and certification of individuals conducting LBP activities
and the accreditation of training programs for LBP activities in 1996
(August 29, 1996, 61 FR 45778). EPA performed an analysis of the
potential impacts on small entities and determined that this action is
likely to have a modest adverse economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities. The TSCA section 404 regulations became effective
August 29, 1998. The final rule then provided for an additional phase-
in period for the requirements for training program accreditation,
individual and firm certification, and work practice standards.
Regulations for accreditation of training programs became effective on
March 1, 1999. Regulations for certification of individuals and firms
became fully effective on March 1, 2000. EPA is reviewing the 1996
regulation pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
USC 610). The purpose of this review is to determine whether the rule
should be continued without change, or should be amended or rescinded,
to minimize economic impacts on small entities while still complying
with the provisions of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EPA has
already solicited comment on the continued need for the rule; the
complexity of the rule; the extent to which it overlaps, duplicates, or
conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government rules; and the
degree to which technology, economic conditions or other relevant
factors have changed since the rule was promulgated. We expect to
announce the completion of this review and report its outcome in 2004.
See EPA Docket ID number
[[Page 38263]]
OPPT-2003-0015 at www.epa.gov/edocket.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 1 08/29/96 61 FR 45778
Review Begin 05/27/03 68 FR 30942
Comment Period End 12/22/03 68 FR 73543
Review End 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4788.
Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-566-0484
Fax: 202 566-0471
Email: wheeler.cindy@epamail.epa.gov
Mike Wilson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0521
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: wilson.mike@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD65
_______________________________________________________________________
3320. NOTIFICATION OF CHEMICAL EXPORTS UNDER TSCA
SECTION 12(B)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2611
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 707
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 12(b)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
states, in part, that any person who exports or intends to export to a
foreign country a chemical substance or mixture for which submission of
data is required under section 4 or 5(b), or for which a rule, action
or order has been proposed or promulgated under section 5, 6, or 7,
shall notify the EPA Administrator of such export or intent to export.
The Administrator in turn will notify the government of the importing
country of EPA's regulatory action with respect to the substance.
Legislation is currently pending to address the implementation in the
US of the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent (PIC), which
itself includes export notification requirements. In order to address
these concerns, and additional concerns expressed by other
stakeholders, EPA intends to report to OMB in one year on the status of
PIC implementation in the US. If the PIC agreement is in force in the
US in August 2004, EPA will develop a plan of action for considering
potential amendments to the 12(b) regulation. If the PIC Agreement is
not yet in force in one year, EPA will take stock of the status of the
PIC agreement in the US and, if appropriate, develop a plan of action
for considering potential changes to the 12(b) regulation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Review Begin 08/00/04
Review End 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4858.
Agency Contact: Greg Schweer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Dave Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 913-551-7625
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: williams.dave@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AJ01
_______________________________________________________________________
3321. LEAD-BASED PAINT ACTIVITIES; VOLUNTARY PROGRAM
FOR RENOVATION AND REMODELING
Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682 ``TSCA 4 402''; PL 102-550 ``sec
402(c)(3)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under section 402(c)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) title IV, EPA conducted a study of the extent to which persons
engaged in renovation and remodeling activities in target housing are
exposed to lead in the conduct of such activities or disturb lead and
create a lead-based paint hazard. EPA refers to the results of this
study and consult with interested parties to determine which categories
of renovation and remodeling activities require training and
certification and which of the training and certification regulations
originally developed for individuals performing lead-based paint
abatement under section 402(a) of TSCA should be revised to apply them
to the renovation and remodeling categories. If EPA determines that any
category does not require certification, EPA must publish an
explanation of the basis for that determination. As an alternative to
the regulatory program, EPA is working with stakeholders to develop a
voluntary program for renovations and remodeling activities. The
voluntary program would partner the Agency and notional organizations
together to promote an initiative which could provide incentives to
participating contractors and property owners who incorporate lead safe
work practices into their standard operating procedures. The Agency
plans, in an ANPRM to be published in fall of 2004, to introduce the
voluntary program, discuss its component parts, and review how it will
be evaluated.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice Announcing 1st Pilot 09/00/04
Notice Announcing 2nd Pilot 05/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3557.1. Split from RIN 2070-AC83.
Agency Contact: Mike Wilson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-566-0521
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: wilson.mike@epamail.epa.gov
Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
[[Page 38264]]
Phone: 202-566-1980
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: simpson.julie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AJ03
_______________________________________________________________________
3322. TSCA INVENTORY NOMENCLATURE FOR ENZYMES AND PROTEINS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720.45
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This notice will alert interested parties that EPA is
considering new procedures and regulations for naming enzymes and
proteins when listing such substances on the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) Chemical Substances Inventory (Inventory). More
specifically, this notice outlines four identification elements that
EPA currently believes are appropriate for use in developing unique
TSCA Inventory nomenclature for proteinaceous enzymes. This notice also
solicits public comment on several specific questions relating to this
topic.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4878.
Agency Contact: Jim Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8974
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: alwood.jim@epamail.epa.gov
Henry Lau, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, TS-793, 7406M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8572
Email: lau.henry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AJ04
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3323. AMENDMENT TO THE PREMANUFACTURE NOTIFICATION EXEMPTIONS; REVISIONS
OF EXEMPTIONS FOR POLYMERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 723
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action will eliminate exemptions under the
Polymer Exemption Rule for certain polymers containing perfluoralkyl
sulfonate (PFAS), perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFAC), perfluoroalky-
containing telomers, and other polymers containing perfluoroalkkyl
groups. Based on data on perfluorooctyl sulfonate (PFOS) and
perfluorooctonic acid (PFOA), and other chemical substances containing
perfluoroalkyl groups, EPA believes that these substances may persist
in the environment, bioaccumulate, and be toxic. Certain polymers which
contain PFAS, PFAC, perfluoroalkyl-containing telomers, or other
substances with perfluoroalkyl groups, would no longer qualify for
exemption from TSCA section 5 reporting.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/04
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4635.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral
Product Manufacturing; 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Rebecca Cool, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-9138
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: cool.rebecca@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD58
_______________________________________________________________________
3324. TEST RULE; CERTAIN CHEMICALS ON THE ATSDR PRIORITY LIST OF
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''; 15 USC 2611 ``TSCA 12''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing a test rule under section 4(a) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) requiring manufacturers and processors of
eight chemicals to fulfill data needs identified by the Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the National Toxicology
Program (NTP), and EPA pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) section 104(i).
Under CERCLA, ATSDR is to establish a list of priority hazardous
substances found at superfundsites, develop toxicological profiles for
the hazardous substances, identify priority data needs, and establish a
research program obtaining the necessary data. This action is a
component of ATSDR's research program. Data from this action would
provide specific information about the substances for the public and
scientific community. The information would be used in conducting
comprehensive public health assessments of populations living near
hazardous waste sites. Scientific data improves the quality of risk
assessments used by EPA, other Federal agencies, and State and local
governments. The risk assessments affect standards, guidelines,
listing/delisting, and other decisions affecting public health and the
environment. In addition, this action would require manufacturers and
processors to develop data for these chemicals that will be used by EPA
under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to evaluate residual risks from hazardous
air pollutants (HAPs) on the list of HAPs in the CAA under section
112(f), 42 USC 7412(f) and sections 112(d and e). Data from this action
would also be used to support implementation of several provisions of
section 112 of the CAA including, determining risks remaining after the
application of technology based standards under section 112(d) of the
[[Page 38265]]
CAA, estimating the risks associated with accidental releases, and
determining whether or not substances should be removed (delisted) from
section (b)(1) of the CAA list of HAPS.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 2563.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Robert Jones, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8161
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: jones.robert@epamail.epa.gov
Greg Schweer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB79
_______________________________________________________________________
3325. TEST RULE; MULTIPLE SUBSTANCE RULE FOR THE TESTING OF
DEVELOPMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''; 15 USC 2607(a) ``TSCA 8''; 15
USC 2611 ``TSCA 12''; 15 USC 2625 ``TSCA 26''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799; 40 CFR 704
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is reproposing a test rule under section 4 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) that would require manufacturers, defined
by statute to include importers, and processors of seven (7) substances
to conduct testing for developmental and/or reproductive toxicity. EPA
is also proposing reporting rules for two of the seven substances.
These rules would require the reporting of production volumes so it
will be possible to determine when the testing program can be triggered
for the two substances without causing a significant impact on
revenues. This is a re-proposal of a test rule announced March 4, 1991
(56 FR 9092).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM original 03/04/91 56 FR 9092
NPRM 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4395.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Catherine Roman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8172
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: roman.catherine@epamail.epa.gov
Greg Schweer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD44
_______________________________________________________________________
3326. TSCA INVENTORY UPDATE RULE REVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(a) ``TSCA 8(a)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 710
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In this follow-on action to the Inventory Update Rule
Amendments (IURA) (RIN 2070-AC61) that was finalized in January 2003,
EPA is making additional changes to the IUR to adjust the submission
period, the reporting frequency, and the recordkeeping period, and to
clarify language associated with petitioning to be partially exempt
from reporting requirements and with reporting information on imported
materials. Additionally, certain technical corrections, such as
removing obsolete regulatory text associated with IUR reporting that
occurred in 2002 and correcting certain paragraph references will be
included. EPA anticipates adverse comments on moving the submission
period and therefore is first proposing these changes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3301.1. Split from RIN 2070-AC61.
Sectors Affected: 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing; 325
Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Susan Sharkey, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7406M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8789
Fax: 202 564-8893
Email: sharkey.susan@epamail.epa.gov
Robert Lee, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7406M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8786
Fax: 202 564-8893
Email: lee.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD63
_______________________________________________________________________
3327. FOLLOW-UP RULES ON EXISTING CHEMICALS
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 ``TSCA 5''; 15 USC 2607 ``TSCA 8''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 707; 40 CFR 710; 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has established a program to monitor the commercial
development of existing chemicals of concern and/or to gather
information to support planned or ongoing risk assessments on such
chemicals. As these chemicals are identified, EPA will initiate
rulemakings under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) sections 5
and/or 8 to require reporting of appropriate needed information by the
manufacturers, importers and/or processors of these chemicals.
Individual proposed or final rules will
[[Page 38266]]
be published on at least the chemicals listed below.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM-2-4 Original 09/27/89 54 FR 39548
NPRM-Chloranil 05/12/93 58 FR 27980
NPRM-Benzidine 08/30/95 60 FR 45119
Final-Benzidine 10/07/96 61 FR 52287
NPRM-Heavy 01/15/02 67 FR 1937
NPRM-p- Aminophenol 06/00/04
NPRM-2-4 12/00/04
Final-Heavy 06/00/05
NPRM-2-Etho 06/00/05
NPRM- Benzidine-amend 06/00/05
NPRM-Methylcyclo 06/00/05
NPRM-Certain 09/00/05
NPRM-o-Tolodine 09/00/05
Final- Benzidine-amend 06/00/06
Final-Chloranil 12/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 1923.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Diane Sheridan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8176
Fax: 202 564-4775
Email: sheridan.diane@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8974
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: alwood.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AA58
_______________________________________________________________________
3328. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE (SNUR); SELECTED FLAME RETARDANT CHEMICAL
SUBSTANCES FOR USE IN RESIDENTIAL UPHOLSTERED FURNITURE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 ``TSCA 5''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 707; 40 CFR 710
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under
section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) covering certain
flame retardant chemicals for use in residential upholstered furniture.
The SNUR would require companies wanting to import or manufacture these
chemicals for the significant new uses described in the proposed rule
to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to the Agency at least 90
days prior to beginning those activities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM: Penta/Octa 10/00/04
NPRM: SFR 12/00/04
Final Action: Penta/Octa 10/00/06
Final Action: SFR 12/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: State
Additional Information: SAN 4512.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 313 Textile Mills; 337121
Upholstered Household Furniture Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Carolyn Grandson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8109
Fax: 202 564-4775
Email: grandson.carolyn@epamail.epa.gov
John Bowser, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8082
Fax: 202 564-4775
Email: bowser.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD48
_______________________________________________________________________
3329. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE (SNUR);
PENTABROMODIPHENYLETHER AND OCTABROMODIPHENYLETHER
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 ``TSCA section 5''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704, 707, 710, 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Pentabromodiphenyl ether and octabromodiphenyl ether are two
members of the class of chemicals called polybrominated diphenyl
ethers, or PBDEs. There are commercial mixtures of PBDEs with different
average amounts of bromination: penta-, octa-, and decaBDE. These
chemicals are major components of commercial formulations often used as
fire retardants in furniture foam (pentaBDE), plastics for TV cabinets,
wire insulation, and backcoatings for draperies and upholstery
(decaBDE), and plastics for personal computers (octaBDE). Environmental
monitoring programs in Europe, Asia, North America, and the Arctic have
detected several PBDEs in human breast milk, fish, aquatic birds, and
elsewhere in the environment, with tetra- to hexabrominated BDEs being
the most frequently detected. The exact mechanisms or pathways by which
these PBDEs end up in the environment and humans would include releases
from manufacturing or processing of the chemicals into products like
plastics or textiles, aging and wear of the end consumer products, and
direct exposure during use (e.g., from furniture). The limited toxicity
test data that is currently available indicate the potential for
adverse effects to humans and environmental organisms, especially for
lower brominated mixtures, and existing hazard and exposure information
on PBDEs is incomplete. These factors, taken together, raise concerns
for long term potential adverse effects in people and wildlife over
time if the lower brominated pentaBDE and octaBDE should continue to be
produced, released, and built up in the environment. EPA believes that
pentaBDE and octaBDE are manufactured and imported in the United States
only by the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation. Great Lakes has committed
to phase out these chemicals voluntarily by discontinuing their
manufacture by the end of 2004. EPA believes that any manufacture or
import of these chemicals occurring after Great Lakes' phase-out dates
would increase the magnitude and duration of exposure to these chemicals.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
[[Page 38267]]
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4870.
Agency Contact: Kenneth Moss, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-9232
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: moss.kenneth@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AJ02
_______________________________________________________________________
3330. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS); EXEMPTION
REQUEST FROM U.S. MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARAD)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 ``TSCA 6(e)(3)(B)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD) is responsible for
disposing of surplus Navy non-combatant ships; many of these ships
contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in electrical equipment, and
are contaminated with more than 50 ppm PCBs in paint, gaskets and cable
that cannot be easily removed. In 2003, MARAD exported 4 surplus ships
to a shipyard in the United Kingdom, Able UK, for scrapping; however,
the planned export of an additional 9 ships has been prevented by a
temporary restraining order issued by the U.S. District Court for D.C.
A hearing will be held in June to determine if the export of these 9
vessels can proceed and the Able UK facility must reapply for various
national and local permits before it can proceed with scrapping of any
MARAD vessels. Following issuance of a letter of enforcement discretion
in May 2003, MARAD has made plans to submit a petition for an export
ban exemption under TSCA 6(e)(3)(B). EPA can grant these petitions
through notice-and-comment rulemaking for a period of up to one year,
provided it can make a finding of no unreasonable risk and good faith
efforts to find substitutes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 2150.1. Split from RIN 2070-AB20.
Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-566-0515
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: gimlin.peter@epamail.epa.gov
Tony Baney, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0514
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: baney.tony@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AJ05
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3331. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULES (SNURS); FOLLOW-UP RULES ON NON-5(E) NEW
CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 ``TSCA 5''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA regulates the commercial development of new chemicals
that have completed premanufacture notice (PMN) review. In a PMN
review, the Agency assesses whether or not a chemical's manufacture,
import, process, distribution, use, or disposal outside the activities
described in the PMN may present an unreasonable risk. EPA will issue
Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) requiring 90-day notification to EPA
from any manufacturer, importer, or processor who would engage in
activities that are designated as significant new uses. Under the
Expedited Follow-up Rule (EFUR) which became effective on October 12,
1989, EPA will identify such new chemicals and publish them in a batch
SNUR 3-4 times per year. Chemicals that were subject to a proposed SNUR
before the effective date of the EFUR or do not qualify under the EFUR,
may be regulated individually by notice and comment rulemaking and are
listed below.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM: 84-1056 06/11/86 51 FR 21199
NPRM: 86-566 12/08/87 52 FR 46496
NPRM 06/11/93 58 FR 32628
Final Rule: 84-1056 12/00/04
Final Rule: 86-566 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 1976.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and Coal
Products Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jim Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8974
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: alwood.jim@epamail.epa.gov
Rebecca Cool, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-9138
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: cool.rebecca@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AA59
_______________________________________________________________________
3332. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE (SNUR); CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC SNURS TO EXTEND
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5(E) ORDERS
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 ``TSCA 5''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 38268]]
Abstract: When the Agency determines that uncontrolled manufacture,
import, processing, distribution, use or disposal of a premanufacture
notification (PMN) substance may present an unreasonable risk, it may
issue a section 5(e) consent order to limit these activities. However,
such orders apply only to the PMN submitter. Once the new substance is
entered on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) chemical inventory,
others can manufacture, import or process the substance without
controls. Therefore, EPAextends the controls to apply to others by
designating manufacture, import or processing of the substances for
uses without the specified controls as significant new uses. Under the
Expedited Follow-Up Rule, which became effective on October 10, 1989
(54 FR 31314), EPA routinely publishes batch SNURs containing routine
section 5(e) and non-5(e) SNURs. However, certain activities, such as
modifications, withdrawals, revocations, and SNURs upon which comments
are received in the direct final publication process, are subject to
notice and comment rulemaking and are listed below.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 1 06/06/94 59 FR 29255
NPRM 2 12/19/94 59 FR 65289
NPRM 3 06/26/97 62 FR 34421
NPRM 4 09/09/98 63 FR 48157
Final 1 12/00/04
Final 2 12/00/04
Final 3 12/00/04
Final Action 4 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3495.
Sectors Affected: 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing; 325
Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jim Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8974
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: alwood.jim@epamail.epa.gov
Rebecca Cool, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-9138
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: cool.rebecca@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB27
_______________________________________________________________________
3333. TEST RULES AND ENFORCEABLE CONSENT AGREEMENTS UNDER THE TOXIC
SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (GENERIC ENTRY)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''; 15 USC 2611 ``TSCA 12''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 4 of TSCA gives EPA the authority to require chemical
manufacturers and processors to test existing chemicals. Under Section
4, EPA can by rule require testing after finding that (1) a chemical
may present an unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the
environment, and/or the chemical is produced in substantial quantities
that could result in significant or substantial human or environmental
exposure, (2) the available data to evaluate the chemical are
inadequate, and (3) testingis needed to develop the needed data. The
Chemical Testing Program in EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics (OPPT) also works with members of the U.S. chemical industry to
develop needed data via TSCA Section 4 Enforceable Consent Agreements
(ECAs) and Voluntary Testing Agreements (VTAs). ECAs and VTAs are
usually less resource intensive than formal TSCA rule-making and allow
EPA to consider agreed-upon pollution prevention and other types of
product stewardship initiatives by the chemical industry as a possible
substitute for or adjunct to certain types of needed testing. EPA is
considering whether to require testing on the chemicals listed below
through rulemaking, or enforceable consent agreements (ECAs), or will
publish a notice which provides the reasons for not doing so for
chemicals listed herein. These chemicals have been designated for
priority testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee
(ITC) or recommended for testing consideration (for which the 12-month
statutory requirement does not apply). The list also includes chemicals
or categories of chemicals which have been identified for testing
consideration by other Federal or other EPA offices through EPA review
processes.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM (Aryl Phos) 12/29/83 48 FR 57452
NPRM (BFRs) 06/25/91 56 FR 29140
NPRM (Aryl Phos) 01/17/92 57 FR 2138
Final Action-ECA (DBE) 08/05/99 64 FR 42692
Final Action-ECA (TCE) 06/15/00 65 FR 37550
Final Action-ECA (EDC) 06/03/03 68 FR 33125
Final Action-ECA (H.F.) 12/00/04
Final Action-ECA (M.A.) 12/00/04
Final Action-ECA (P.A.) 12/00/04
Final Action-ECA (ArylP) 06/00/05
Final Action-ECA (DEA) 06/00/05
Supplemental NPRM (BFRs) 03/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3493.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Greg Schweer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Dave R. Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8179
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: williams.daver@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB94
_______________________________________________________________________
3334. TEST RULE; TESTING OF CERTAIN HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME (HPV)
CHEMICALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603; 15 USC 2611 to 261212; 15 USC 2625 to 2626
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 38269]]
Abstract: This rule will require testing and recordkeeping requirements
for certain high production volume (HPV) chemicals (i.e., chemicals
which are manufactured (including imported) in the aggregate at more
than 1 million pounds on an annual basis). Although varied based on
specific data needs for the particular chemical, the data generally
collected under this rule may include: acute toxicity, repeat dose
toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, mutagenicity,
ecotoxicity, and environmental fate. The first rule proposed testing
for 37 HPV chemicals with substantial worker exposure. The number may
be reduced based on new information on annual production volumes,
worker exposure, and commitments to the HPV Challenge Program. The
action is part of the Chemical Right-to-Know Initiative, which is
described in The Regulatory Plan.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/26/00 65 FR 81658
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3990. See also the Regulatory Plan entry
entitled Chemical Right-to-Know Initiative (RIN 2070-AD25; SAN 4176).
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries
Agency Contact: Catherine Roman, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8172
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: roman.catherine@epamail.epa.gov
Greg Schweer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD16
_______________________________________________________________________
3335. TSCA SECTION 8(A) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT INFORMATION RULES
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(a) ``TSCA 8(a)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 712
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: These rules add chemicals to the list of chemicals and
designated mixtures subject to the requirements of the Toxic Substances
Control Act section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (40
CFR part 712). These chemicals have been identified by the Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, other EPA offices, and other Federal
agencies, as well as recommended for testing consideration by the
Interagency Testing Committee. Manufacturers and importers are required
to submit exposure-relateddata (EPA Form No. 7710-35) on the chemicals.
These data will be used to monitor the levels of production, import
and/or processing of these substances and the avenues of human and
environmental exposure to these substances. These data will also
support risk assessment and test rule decisions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final 37th ITC List 02/28/96 61 FR 7421
Final 38th ITC List 10/29/96 61 FR 55871
Final 38th ITC List-Stay 12/11/96 61 FR 65186
Final 38th-tech stay 01/07/98 63 FR 684
Final 38th ITC-rev 01/11/00 65 FR 1548
Final 39th ITC List 01/11/00 65 FR 1548
Final 41st ITC List 07/05/00 65 FR 41371
Final 42nd ITC List 07/24/00 65 FR 45535
Final 47th ITC List 07/26/01 66 FR 38955
Final 51st ITC List 06/11/03 68 FR 34832
Final 53rd ITC List 11/00/04
Final 54th ITC List 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 2178.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Gerry Brown, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8086
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: brown.gerry@epamail.epa.gov
Joseph Nash, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8886
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: nash.joseph@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB08
_______________________________________________________________________
3336. TSCA SECTION 8(D) HEALTH AND SAFETY DATA REPORTING RULES
Priority: Routine and Frequent
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(d) ``TSCA 8(d)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 716
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: These rules require manufacturers, importers and processors
to submit unpublished health and safety data on chemicals added to the
requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act section 8(d) Health
and Safety Data Reporting Rule (40 CFR part 716). These chemicals have
been identified by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, other
EPA offices, and other Federal agencies, as well as recommended for
testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final: 38th ITC List 10/29/96 61 FR 55871
Final: 38th ITC List 12/11/96 61 FR 65186
Final: 38th ITC List 01/07/98 63 FR 684
Final: 38th ITC List 01/11/00 65 FR 1548
Final: 43, 47, 50 & 51st ITC
Lists 05/04/04 69 FR 24517
Final: 54th ITC List 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 1139.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Gerry Brown, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8086
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: brown.gerry@epamail.epa.gov
[[Page 38270]]
John Harris, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8156
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: harris.john@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB11
_______________________________________________________________________
3337. TESTING AGREEMENT FOR PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID (PFOA)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: PFOA is a synthetic (manmade) chemical that does not occur
naturally in the environment. EPA identified data gaps regarding the
sources and exposure pathways of PFOA and is seeking additional data
concerning the potential relationship between fluoropolymer and
fluorotelomer based polymer chemicals and PFOA. EPA has invited
interested parties to monitor or participate in negotiations for
developing several industry sponsored testing programs concerning
fluoropolymers and fluorotelomer based polymers which may metabolize or
degrade to PFOA. These testing programs would be set in place
preferably as publicly negotiated enforceable consent agreements (ECAs)
under section 4 of theToxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) among EPA,
industry, and interested parties under section 4 of TSCA, but may also
be established as negotiated memoranda of understanding (MOUs) where
circumstances preclude moving forward under ECAs. The goal of the PFOA
ECA process is to better understand the sources andexposure pathways
leading to the presence of PFOA in humans and the environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3493.1. Split from RIN 2070-AB94.
Agency Contact: Greg Schweer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Dave R. Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8179
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: williams.daver@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AJ06
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3338. ASBESTOS MODEL ACCREDITATION PLAN REVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2646 ``TSCA 206''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 763
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 28, 1992, -.
Abstract: The Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act
(ASHARA) amended TSCA to require that EPA revise its asbestos model
accreditation plan (MAP) to extend training and accreditation
requirements to include persons performing certain asbestos-related
work in public or commercial buildings, to increase the minimum number
of training hours required for accreditation purposes and to effect
other changes necessary to implement the amendments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Model Plan 05/13/92 57 FR 20438
Interim Final Action 02/03/94 59 FR 5236
Final Action 05/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3148.
Sectors Affected: 611519 Other Technical and Trade Schools
Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8593
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: courtnage.robert@epamail.epa.gov
Tony Baney, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0514
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: baney.tony@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC51
_______________________________________________________________________
3339. LEAD FISHING SINKERS; RESPONSE TO CITIZENS PETITION AND PROPOSED
BAN
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 ``TSCA 6''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On October 20, 1992, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF),
Federation of Fly Fishers, Trumpeter Swan Society, and North American
Loon Fund petitioned EPA under section 21 of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA), and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), to
initiate rulemaking proceedings under section 6 of TSCA to require that
the sale of lead fishing sinkers be accompanied by an appropriate label
or notice warning that such products are toxic to wildlife. EPA granted
the petition, however, the Agency believes that a labeling provision
would not adequately address the risk of injury to waterfowl and other
birds (waterbirds), from ingestion of lead fishing sinkers. In
addition, EPA also believes that zinc fishing sinkers adversely affect
waterbirds, and can cause mortality.
[[Page 38271]]
Therefore, EPA has proposed a rule under section 6(a) of TSCA to
prohibit the manufacturing, processing, and distribution in commerce in
the United States, of certain smaller size fishing sinkers containing
lead and zinc, and mixed with other substances, including those made of
brass.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 05/13/91 56 FR 22096
NPRM 03/09/94 59 FR 11122
Final Action 12/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3252.
Agency Contact: Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-566-1980
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: simpson.julie@epamail.epa.gov
Mike Wilson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0521
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: wilson.mike@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC21
_______________________________________________________________________
3340. LEAD-BASED PAINT ACTIVITIES; TRAINING, ACCREDITATION, AND
CERTIFICATION RULE AND MODEL STATE PLAN RULE--BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''; PL 102-550 ``sec 402''; PL
102-550 ``sec 404''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, April 28, 1994.
Abstract: The Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992
mandates EPA promulgate regulations governing lead-based paint (LBP)
activities to ensure that individuals engaged in such activities are
properly trained, that LBP training programs are accredited, and that
contractors engaged in such activities are certified. In addition, EPA
must promulgate a Model State program which may be adopted by any State
which seeks to administer and enforce a State Program. EPA promulgated
regulations fortraining and certification of training programs for LBP
activities and child occupied facilities in 1996 (see 40 CFR 745).
Regulations for LBP activities in public and commercial buildings and
bridges and other structures are still under development.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/05
Final Action 12/00/07
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4376.
Sectors Affected: 23411 Highway and Street Construction; 611519 Other
Technical and Trade Schools
Agency Contact: Joel Wolf, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-260-3890
Fax: 202 566-0471
Email: wolf.joel@epamail.epa.gov
Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1980
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: simpson.julie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC64
_______________________________________________________________________
3341. LEAD; MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF LEAD-BASED PAINT DEBRIS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682; 15 USC 2684; 42 USC 6901 to 6992
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Currently, waste derived from lead-based paint (LBP)
abatements is managed under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) hazardous waste regulations. Other Federal agencies (Department
of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Health and Human
Services) and several States and advocacy groups expressed concern that
the costs associated with the disposal of large volume architectural
components (e.g., doors and windows) may interfere with abatement
activities. EPA's Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
and the Office of Solid Waste initiated a joint rulemaking to address
the disposal of these architectural components. The proposed rule
developed disposal standards for these components under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) title IV, (the definition of abatement
under TSCA title IV, section 401(1)(B), includes disposal). The TSCA
proposal established appropriate disposal standards for LBP
architectural components and identified recycling and incineration
activities that would be controlled or prohibited. To minimize
duplication of waste management requirements, EPA is developed a
companion RCRA rule to suspend temporarily hazardous waste management
regulations applicable to lead-based paint debris which will be subject
to the new TSCA standards. On July 31, 2000, the Office of Solid Waste
clarified that any LBP waste generated from LBP abatements or
renovation and remodeling activities in households, including single
and multiple residences and hotels, qualifies for the household waste
exemption from the RCRA hazardous waste requirements of Subtitle C. The
primary purpose of these amendments was to create less expensive
disposal options for LBP waste. The proposal also indicated that EPA
had no plans to finalize the 1998 proposal as it pertained to the RCRA
program. On June 18, 2003, OSW issued its final rule entitled
``Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities.'' The
final TSCA rule will address remaining issues affecting disposal,
reuse, and transportation and containerization of LBP debris.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/18/98 63 FR 70189
Comment Extension 02/12/99 64 FR 7159
[[Page 38272]]
NPRM (OSW) 10/23/01 66 FR 53566
Final Action (OSW) 06/18/03 68 FR 36487
Final Action 10/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3508. See also RCRA companion rule:
Temporary Suspension of Toxicity Characteristic Rule for Specified
Lead-Based Paint Debris (SAN 4263; RIN 2050-AE68).,
NPRM-http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-
TRI/1998/December/Day-18/tri33326.htm
Sectors Affected: 233 Building, Developing and General Contracting;
23332 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction; 23542
Drywall, Plastering, Acoustical and Insulation Contractors; 23592 Glass
and Glazing Contractors; 23521 Painting and Wall Covering Contractors;
23511 Plumbing, Heating and Air-Conditioning Contractors; 23321 Single
Family Housing Construction; 562111 Solid Waste Collection; 54138
Testing Laboratories; 23594 Wrecking and Demolition Contractors
Agency Contact: Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1980
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: simpson.julie@epamail.epa.gov
Cindy Wheeler, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0484
Fax: 202 566-0471
Email: wheeler.cindy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC72
_______________________________________________________________________
3342. LEAD-BASED PAINT ACTIVITIES; ABATEMENT AMENDMENTS FOR RENOVATION
AND REMODELING
Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682 ``TSCA 402''; PL 102-550 ``sec 402(c)(3)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, October 28, 1996.
Abstract: In accordance with section 402(c)(3) of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA), EPA may consider introducing regulatory
requirements for renovation and remodeling contractors who work in
target housing and child-occupied facilities where, as a result of
their work, lead hazards are created. In anticipation of these
requirements, the Agency is reviewing the existing training and
certification requirements for abatement contractors codified at 40 CFR
part 745, subpart L. The modifications to the abatement requirements
will ensure compatibility between the existing requirements and any
future renovation requirements. This is necessary because there is
considerable overlap between the workforce and techniques associated
with the two regulated activities. These revisions will also provide an
opportunity for the Agency to address minor technical and procedural
amendments that correct long-standing errors in the existing
requirements or update them based on program experiences to date.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/08
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3557.
Sectors Affected: 23599 All Other Special Trade Contractors; 23551
Carpentry Contractors; 53111 Lessors of Residential Buildings and
Dwellings; 23322 Multifamily Housing Construction; 23521 Painting and
Wall Covering Contractors; 531311 Residential Property Managers; 23321
Single Family Housing Construction; 54138 Testing Laboratories
Agency Contact: Mike Wilson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0521
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: wilson.mike@epamail.epa.gov
Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1980
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: simpson.julie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC83
_______________________________________________________________________
3343. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS); EXEMPTIONS FROM THE PROHIBITIONS
AGAINST MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING, AND DISTRIBUTION IN COMMERCE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605 ``TSCA 6(e)(3)(B)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 6(e)(3)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
provides that the Administrator may grant, by rule, exemptions from the
prohibitions against manufacturing, processing and distribution in
commerce of PCBs upon finding that 1) no unreasonable risk to health or
the environment will occur, and 2) good faith efforts have been made by
the petitioner to develop a substitute for PCB which does not pose an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/06/94 59 FR 62875
NPRM 1 09/17/02 67 FR 58567
Final 1 01/31/03 68 FR 4934
NPRM: MARAD Petition 09/00/04
Final Action 12/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 2150.
Sectors Affected: 2211 Electric Power Generation, Transmission and
Distribution; 31-33 Manufacturing; 5133 Telecommunications
Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC
20460
[[Page 38273]]
Phone: 202-566-0515
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: gimlin.peter@epamail.epa.gov
Tony Baney, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0514
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: baney.tony@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AB20
_______________________________________________________________________
3344. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS); DISPOSAL OF PCBS; IMPLEMENTATION
ISSUES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607 ``TSCA 6''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This proposed regulation will clarify and expand on
implementation issues that have arisen as a result of the publication
of the 1998 PCB Disposal Amendments (63 FR 35384). Topics will include
but not be limited to, Use Authorizations, Public Participation
Process, Appeals Process, Natural Gas Pipelines, Testing and Analysis,
Manifesting of PCB Waste, Publication Process for Validated Alternate
Decontamination Solvents and PCB Analytical Methods and Storage of
Dedicated PCB Equipment. The action to authorize certain non-liquid PCB
applications is also included in this action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4597.
Sectors Affected: 31-33 Manufacturing; 81 Other Services (except Public
Administration); 54 Professional, Scientific and Technical Services; 92
Public Administration; 53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing; 48-49
Transportation; 22 Utilities; 562 Waste Management and Remediation
Services
Agency Contact: Laura Casey, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1982
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: casey.laura@epamail.epa.gov
Tony Baney, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0514
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: baney.tony@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD52
_______________________________________________________________________
3345. TEST RULE; HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (HAPS)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''; 15 USC 2611 ``TSCA 12''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is proposing health effects testing under TSCA section 4
in support of programs and activities required under section 112 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA), governing Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs). Section
112 of the CAA directs EPA to determine the risk to health and the
environment remaining after application of technology-based emissions
standards to major and area sources. Section 112 also sets forth a
mechanism for revising and modifying the statutory list of 189 HAPs
under section 112(b), and requirements for an accidental release
control program. These data will also be important for the right-to-
know program given the large release of these chemicals to the
atmosphere. In order to implement these and other programs and
requirements under section 112, EPA must identify the health and
environment effects of potential concern from exposure to HAPs,
ascertain the minimum data needed to adequately characterize those
health and environmental effects, and assess the risks posed by HAPs.
In addition, under section 103(d), EPA is required to conduct a
research program on the short- and long-term effects of air pollutants
on human health, ascertain the minimum data needed to adequately
characterize those health and environmental effects, and assess the
risks posed by HAPs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/26/96 61 FR 33178
Supp NPRM 12/24/97 62 FR 67466
Supp NPRM 2 04/21/98 63 FR 19694
NPRM - Reproposal 06/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3487.
Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325 Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Rich Leukroth, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8167
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: leukroth.rich@epamail.epa.gov
Dave R. Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8179
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: williams.daver@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC76
_______________________________________________________________________
3346. TEST RULE; CERTAIN METALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''; 15 USC 2611 ``TSCA 12''; 15
USC 2625 ``TSCA 26''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is coordinating an evaluation of the data needs for
assessing potential adverse affects that exposures to metals pose for
health and the environment with the Agencies efforts to develop a
framework for assessing potential risks from exposures to metals. This
activity is intended to lead to EPA proposing a test rule under section
4(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). A test rule would
require manufacturers and processors of certain metals (beryllium,
chromium, manganese, mercury, nickel, and selenium) to fulfill data
needs identified by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR), the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and EPA
pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental
[[Page 38274]]
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) section 104(I), the
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112 and other statutes requiring risk
assessments, health assessments, permits, standards, guidelines,
listing/delisting, and other decisions affecting public health and the
environment. Under CERCLA, ATSDR is to establish a list of priority
hazardous substances found at superfund sites, develop toxicological
profiles for the hazardous substances, identify priority data needs,
and establish a research program obtaining the necessary data. This
action is a component of ATSDR's research program. Data from this
action would provide specific information about the substances for the
public and scientific communities. Data from this action would also be
used to implement several provisions of section 112 of the CAA,
including determining risks remaining after the application of
technology based on standards under section 112(d) of the CAA,
estimating the risks associated with accidental releases, and
determining whether or not substances should be removed from the CAA
section (b)(1) list of HAPs (delisting).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3882.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Robert Jones, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8161
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: jones.robert@epamail.epa.gov
Greg Schweer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD10
_______________________________________________________________________
3347. TESTING AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN OXYGENATED FUEL ADDITIVES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2603 ``TSCA 4''; 15 USC 2611 ``TSCA 12''; 15
USC 2625 ``TSCA 26''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA's Office of Air and Radiation (OAR), in the
administration of section 211 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), has requested
that OPPT use its TSCA section 4 testing authority to obtain health
effects data on a number of Oxygenated Fuel Additives (OFAs). These
data are needed by EPA and others to increase understanding of the
toxicity of these substances individually and in comparison to each
other as well as to other OFAs such as methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE). EPA
will be soliciting interested parties to work on an Enforceable Consent
Agreement (ECA) under TSCA section 4, through which responsible parties
can agree to provide data to EPA. Although not currently a rulemaking,
EPA is including this in the Regulatory Agenda to inform the public of
this activity which will have a regulatory impact once an ECA is finalized.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice to solicit 06/00/05
Notice ECA 12/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4174.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Ward Penberthy, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, 7405M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8171
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: penberthy.ward@epamail.epa.gov
George Semeniuk, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8174
Fax: 202-564-4765
Email: semeniuk.george@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD28
_______________________________________________________________________
3348. SIGNIFICANT NEW USE RULE (SNUR); REFRACTORY CERAMIC FIBERS (RCFS)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 ``TSCA 5''; 15 USC 2605 ``TSCA 6''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704; 40 CFR 721
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has instituted a program to monitor the commercial
development of existing chemicals of concern and/or to gather
information to support risk assessments on such chemicals. As these
chemicals are identified, EPA will initiate rulemakings under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) sections 5 and/or 6 to require reporting
by the manufacturers, importers and/or processors of these chemicals.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/21/94 59 FR 13294
Final Action 09/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3528.
Sectors Affected: 327999 All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral
Product Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8593
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: courtnage.robert@epamail.epa.gov
Peter Gimlin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0515
Fax: 202 566-0473
Email: gimlin.peter@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC37
[[Page 38275]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3349. VOLUNTARY HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME (HPV) CHEMICAL CHALLENGE PROGRAM
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq (TSCA)
CFR Citation: None
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: One of the key components of the Chemical Right-to-Know
(ChemRTK) Initiative is the HPV Challenge Program. The goal of this
program is to ensure that a baseline set of health and environmental
effects data on approximately 2,800 high production volume (HPV)
chemicals is made available to EPA and the public. U.S. HPV chemicals
are industrial chemicals that are manufactured or imported into the
United States in volumes of 1 million pounds or more per year. U.S.
Manufacturers and importers of HPV chemicals were invited to
voluntarily sponsor chemicals in the HPV Challenge Program. Sponsorship
entails the identification and initial assessment of the adequacy of
existing information, the conduct of new testing only if adequate
information does not exist, and making the new and existing test
results available to the public. Any needed testing on the HPV
chemicals in the HPV Challenge Program should be completed by 2004 with
all data available to the public by 2005. The Agency intends to
consider specific chemicals which are not voluntarily sponsored in the
HPV Challenge Program as candidates for test rules under Section 4 of
the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Although this Initiative is
not a rulemaking, EPA has included it in the Regulatory Agenda to
inform the public.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice 12/26/00 65 FR 81686
Notice: Initiative Complete 12/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4176. See also items identified under the
following RINs 2070-AD09; 2070-AD38; RIN 2070-AD16; RIN 2070-AC27.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum Refineries
Agency Contact: Diane Sheridan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-564-8176
Fax: 202 564-4775
Email: sheridan.diane@epamail.epa.gov
Jim Alwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8974
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: alwood.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD25
_______________________________________________________________________
3350. TSCA POLICY STATEMENT ON OVERSIGHT OF TRANSGENIC ORGANISMS
(INCLUDING PLANTS)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As a follow-up to the final Biotechnology Rule under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) EPA intends to address TSCA
oversight of transgenic plants and other organisms. Recent information
indicates that transgenic plants and other organisms are being
developed for uses which appear to be subject to TSCA jurisdiction. For
example, plants are being genetically modified to produce industrial
grade, rather than food grade, oils. Many of these plants are subject
to oversight by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
of the U.S. Department of Agriculture while being tested in the
environment. Following APHIS approval of a petition for non-regulated
status filed pursuant to APHIS' regulations implementing the Federal
Plant Pest Act at 7 CFR Part 340, however, these plants cease to be
subject to regulation by USDA. Additionally, transgenic animals that
are not under the jurisdiction of FDA appear to be subject to TSCA.
Such animals may be genetically improved livestock forcommercial
purposes. The policy statement would address whether EPA should
exercise jurisdiction under TSCA over such transgenic organisms prior
to their commercial use.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4598.
Agency Contact: Flora Chow, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8983
Fax: 202 564-9062
Email: chow.flora@epamail.epa.gov
Rebecca Cool, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7405, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-9138
Fax: 202 564-9490
Email: cool.rebecca@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD53
_______________________________________________________________________
3351. LEAD; AMENDMENTS TO REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURE OF KNOWN LEAD-
BASED PAINT OR LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS IN TARGET HOUSING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 4852d
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745.100; 40 CFR 745.101; 40 CFR 745.102; 40 CFR
745.103; 40 CFR 745.107; 40 CFR 745.110; 40 CFR 745.113; 40 CFR
745.115; 40 CFR 745.118; 40 CFR 745.119
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Amendments will clarify to which target housing transactions
the rule applies; add or clarify definitions of important terms;
clarify the disclosure responsibilities of agents; clarify what
information must be disclosed; clarify recordkeeping requirements to
support enforcement; and will amend existing regulatory text to resolve
some inconsistent interpretations and to incorporate interpretations
that have been issued through guidance. Small businesses and state/
local/tribal governments that sell or lease target housing will be
affected in that they will need to become familiar with new/revised
requirements
[[Page 38276]]
that apply to these transactions. Overall burden is not expected to
increase significantly.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/00/06
Final Action 05/00/08
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4777.
Sectors Affected: 53111 Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings;
53121 Offices of Real Estate Agents and Brokers; 531311 Residential
Property Managers; 92511 Administration of Housing Programs; 522292
Real Estate Credit
Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-566-0484
Fax: 202 566-0471
Email: wheeler.cindy@epamail.epa.gov
Julie Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 7404T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1980
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: simpson.julie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD64
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3352. LEAD; NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LEAD-BASED PAINT ABATEMENT
ACTIVITIES AND TRAINING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/08/04 69 FR 18495
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Agency Contact: Mike Wilson
Phone: 202-566-0521
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: wilson.mike@epamail.epa.gov
Julie Simpson
Phone: 202-566-1980
Fax: 202 566-0469
Email: simpson.julie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD31
_______________________________________________________________________
3353. TEST RULE; IN VITRO DERMAL ABSORPTION RATE TESTING OF CERTAIN
CHEMICALS OF INTEREST TO THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 04/26/04 69 FR 22402
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Agency Contact: Catherine Roman
Phone: 202-564-8172
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: roman.catherine@epamail.epa.gov
Greg Schweer
Phone: 202-564-8469
Fax: 202 564-4765
Email: schweer.greg@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AD42
_______________________________________________________________________
3354. TSCA SECTION 8(E) POLICY; NOTICE OF CLARIFICATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 06/03/03 68 FR 33129
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Richard Hefter
Phone: 202 564-7649
Fax: 202 564-7460
Email: hefter.richard@epa.gov
Terry O'Bryan
Phone: 202 564-7656
Fax: 202 564-7450
Email: obryan.terry@epa.gov
RIN: 2070-AC80
[[Page 38277]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Emergency Planning and Community Right--to--Know Act (EPCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3355. EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT: MODIFICATION
TO THE THRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY METHODOLOGY FOR THE EXTREMELY
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES THAT ARE SOLIDS IN SOLUTION.
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering an alternative approach for the threshold
planning quantity (TPQ) for chemicals on the Extremely Hazardous
Substances (EHS) List that are handled as solids in solution. The
current TPQ for solids in solution is based on a very conservative
assumption that the entire quantity of the solid chemical at a facility
could potentially be released to air in event of an accident. EPA will
propose a rule to revise the TPQ for solids in solution and seek
comment on an alternative approach based on industry's request to
revisit the TPQ rationale for the chemical paraquat dichloride (handled
as a solid in aqueous solution). Use of this experimental data would
likely raise the TPQ for solids in solution and result in relieving
some facilities (number and type unknown at this time) from the
regulatory emergency planning and notification requirements under
Section 302-304 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
Act (EPCRA). EPA will evaluate various experimental data for accidental
air releases of solutions containing solid chemicals when developing
revised TPQs. EPA would also seek public comment on the appropriateness
of considering aerosol size as a factor for potential off-site exposure
to communities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4753.
Agency Contact: Kathy Franklin, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7987
Fax: 202 564-8444
Email: franklin.kathy@epamail.epa.gov
Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF08
_______________________________________________________________________
3356. ADDITION OF TOXICITY EQUIVALENCY (TEQ) REPORTING AND QUANTITY DATA
FOR INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE DIOXIN AND DIOXIN-LIKE COMPOUNDS CATEGORY
UNDER EPCRA, SECTION 313
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) (i.e., the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)),
dioxin and dioxin-like compounds are reported in units of grams for the
category. This project will add toxic equivalency (TEQ) reporting for
the category and quantity data for individual members of the category
to the grams only reporting currently required for the category under
EPCRA section 313. TEQs are a weighted quantity measure based on the
toxicity of each dioxin congener relative to the most toxic dioxin
congeners, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 1,2,3,7,8-
pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. The addition of TEQ reporting will allow
better understanding of the releases and waste management quantities
currently reported to the TRI for dioxin and dioxin-like compounds. TEQ
reporting will also make it easier to compare TRI data on dioxin and
dioxin-like compounds with other EPA activities which present data on
dioxin and dioxin-like compounds in terms of TEQs. Several industry
groups have written OMB supporting the addition of TEQ reporting to TRI.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/04
Final Action 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4692. TRI has not converted to NAICS so the
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes are listed: SIC Code 10
Metal Mining (except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094), SIC Code 12 Coal
Mining (except SIC code 1241), SIC Code 20-39 Manufacturing, SIC Codes
4911, 4931, and 4939 Electric Utilities (limited to facilities that
combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for
distribution in commerce), SIC Code 4953 Commercial Hazardous Waste
Treatment (limited to facilities regulated under the RCRA, subtitle C,
42 U.S.C. section 6921 et seq.), SIC Code 5169 Chemicals and Allied
Products-Wholesale, SIC Code 5171 Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants,
SIC Code 7389 Solvent Recovery Services (limited to facilities
primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis).
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/tri
Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0743
Fax: 202 566-0741
Email: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0742
Fax: 202-566-0741
Email: dombrowski.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA12
_______________________________________________________________________
3357. TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORY REPORTING BURDEN
REDUCTION RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The primary goal of this effort by EPA is to reduce burdens
associated with TRI reporting while at the same time continuing to
provide valuable information to the public consistent with the goals
and statutory requirements of the TRI program. But at the same time
ensures that Toxics
[[Page 38278]]
Release Inventory (TRI) continues to provide communities with the same
high level of significant chemical release and other waste management
information.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/00/05
Final Action 05/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4896.
Agency Contact: Cassandra Vail, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0753
Fax: 202 566-0741
Email: vail.cassandra@epamail.epa.gov
Evangeline Cummings, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0621
Fax: 202-566-0706
Email: cummings.evangeline@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA14
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Emergency Planning and Community Right--to--Know Act (EPCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3358. RESPONSE TO A PETITION REQUESTING DELETION OF PHOSMET FROM THE
EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (EHS) LIST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11002; 42 USC 11004; 42 USC 11048
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has received a petition requesting that phosmet be
removed from the list of Extremely Hazardous Substances (EHS) under the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). The
petitioner claims that phosmet does not meet the acute toxicity
criteria for listing. The proposed rule was published on November 12,
2003. EPA received nine comments, eight of those were from
organizations which supported the delisting of phosmet. EPA is in the
process of finalizing this action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/12/03 68 FR 64041
Final Action 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3994.
Sectors Affected: 42291 Farm Supplies Wholesalers; 11133 Noncitrus
Fruit and Tree Nut Farming; 111421 Nursery and Tree Production
Agency Contact: Kathy Franklin, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7987
Fax: 202 564-8444
Email: franklin.kathy@epamail.epa.gov
Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE42
_______________________________________________________________________
3359. RULEMAKING TO CHANGE TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY (TRI) REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS FROM STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC) CODES TO
NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NAICS) CODES
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: ``Not Yet Determined''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a Federal
Register Notice of final decision (62 FR 68) to adopt the North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) for the United States.
This rulemaking initiates the conversion from TRI Reporting using
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes to TRI Reporting using
NAICS codes. The TRI Program will convert to NAICS without producing
any changes in the facilities that are now subject to TRI reporting.
Therefore, there should be no increased burden resulting from this action.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/21/03 68 FR 13872
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4595.
Sectors Affected: 212 Mining (except Oil and Gas); 221 Utilities; 562
Waste Management and Remediation Services; 422 Wholesale Trade,
Nondurable Goods
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/tri
Agency Contact: Judith Kendall, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0750
Fax: 202 566-0741
Email: kendall.judith@epamail.epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0742
Fax: 202-566-0741
Email: dombrowski.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA10
[[Page 38279]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Emergency Planning and Community Right--to--Know Act (EPCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3360. EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT: AMENDMENTS AND
STREAMLINING RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11002; 42 USC 11004; 42 USC 11048; 42 USC
11021; 42 USC 11022
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 355; 40 CFR 370
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will address the remaining issues from the proposed
rule of June 8, 1998. (Reporting thresholds for gasoline and diesel
fuel at retail gas stations were included in a separate final rule; 64
FR 7031, February 11, 1999.) This supplemental proposal will address
reporting thresholds for chemicals that pose minimal risk. The final
rule to the June 8, 1998 proposal and this supplemental proposal will
address: reporting thresholds for rock salt, sand, gravel and other
chemicals that pose minimal risk; plain language rewrite; and may
consider reporting thresholds for facilities with some similarities to
gas stations (motor pools, marinas, etc.) and guidance on approaches to
State flexibility.
This supplemental rule, when finalized, will minimize burden for those
facilities that are currently reporting chemicals that pose minimal
risk under sections 311 and 312 of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act. This rule, when finalized, may also reduce the
number of facilities subject to these reporting requirements. The
reporting requirements under sections 311 and 312 are intended to
enhance communities' and emergency response officials' awareness of
chemical hazards; to facilitate the development of State and local
emergency response plans; and to aid communities and emergency response
officials in preparing for and responding to emergencies safely and
effectively. By proposing to provide relief from routine reporting of
substances with minimal hazards and minimal risk, State and local
officials can focus on chemicals that may pose more significant hazard
or may present greater risks to the community.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/08/98 63 FR 31268
Supp NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Local, State
Additional Information: SAN 3215.
Agency Contact: Vanessa Rodriguez, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7913
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: rodriguez.vanessa@epamail.epa.gov
Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE17
_______________________________________________________________________
3361. TRI; REVIEW OF CHEMICALS ON THE ORIGINAL TRI LIST
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 1101 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: When TRI was established by Congress in 1986, the statutory
language placed 309 chemicals and 20 categories of chemicals on the TRI
list; that is referred to as the original TRI list. The chemicals on
the original list were taken from two existing lists of toxic
substances: the Maryland Chemical Inventory Report List of Toxic or
Hazardous Substances, and the New Jersey Environmental Hazardous
Substances list. This action constitutes the first systematic review of
toxicology and environmental data for all the chemicals on the original
TRI list to determine whether data for those chemicals conform with the
statutory criteria for listing of chemicals on TRI. Chemicals for which
data do not meet the statutory criteria will be delisted.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4015. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AD18.
AFFECTED SECTORS: Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39 plus the
following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except
SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC
code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial
Hazardous Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied
Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169) Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants
(SIC code 5171); and Solvent RecoveryServices (SIC code 7389).
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/tri
Agency Contact: Steve Devito, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0755
Fax: 202 566-0741
Email: devito.steve@epamail.epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0742
Fax: 202-566-0741
Email: dombrowski.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA03
_______________________________________________________________________
3362. TRI; RESPONSES TO PETITIONS RECEIVED TO ADD OR DELETE OR MODIFY
CHEMICAL LISTINGS ON THE TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013 ``EPCRA 313''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This is an ongoing action to cover all chemical petitions
received by the TRI Program. These actions grant or deny petitions
received to add or delete or modify chemicals on the list of toxic
chemicals under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right to Know Act (EPCRA) that are subject to reporting under the Toxic
Chemical Release Reporting Rule. The actions cover individual chemicals
or groups of chemicals for which petitions have been received.
[[Page 38280]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice-DBNPA 10/27/95 60 FR 54949
NPRM-Diisononyl phthalate 09/05/00 65 FR 53681
Report-Alloys 08/22/01 66 FR 44107
Response- Acetonitrile 02/00/05
Response-Chromium Antimony
Titanate 02/00/05
Final-DBNPA 08/00/05
Final-Diisononyl phthalate 11/00/05
Response-19 Volatile corrosion
inhibitor chemicals To Be Determined
Response-Nitrogen tetroxide To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 2425. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC00.
Statutory deadline: Within 180 days of receipt the Agency must either
initiate rulemaking or explain why not in the Federal Register.
Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39 plus the following
industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10 except SIC codes
1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except SIC code 1241);
Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939); Commercial Hazardous
Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and Allied Products-
Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants (SIC
code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389).
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/tri
Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0743
Fax: 202 566-0741
Email: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0742
Fax: 202-566-0741
Email: dombrowski.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________
3363. TRI; REVISIONS TO THE OTHERWISE USE ACTIVITY EXEMPTIONS AND THE
COAL EXTRACTION ACTIVITIES EXEMPTION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) requires reporting from
facilities that manufacture or process at least 25,000 pounds of a
listed non-PBT chemical, or otherwise use 10,000 pounds of a listed
non-PBT chemical. The activity thresholds are lower for listed PBT
chemicals. In determining amounts of listed chemicals that are
manufactured, processed or otherwise used, facilities may consider
specific exemptions from reporting. EPA is presently reviewing a group
of these exemptions. The categories of exemptions presently being
reconsidered by EPA are the personal use exemption, and the motor
vehicle maintenance exemption. Also known as otherwise use exemptions
because they are limited to otherwise use activities, these exemptions
are expressly provided for at 40 CFR 372.38(c). EPA is also considering
changes to the coal mining extraction activities exemption provided for
at 40 CFR 372.38(g).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4265. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AD39. By
Statute and Regulation, this rule will affect SIC codes 20-39, 10
(except SIC codes 1011, 1081, 1094), 12 (except SIC code 1241), 4911,
4931, 4939, 4953, 5169, 5171, and 7389.
Agency Contact: Marc Edmonds, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0758
Fax: 202 566-0741
Email: edmonds.marc@epamail.epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0742
Fax: 202-566-0741
Email: dombrowski.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA06
_______________________________________________________________________
3364. TRI; POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11013 ``Pollution Prevention Act''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Section 6607(b) of the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA)
(Pub. L. 101-508) requires the addition of several data elements to the
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements as
promulgated under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) (Pub. L. 99-499). Section 313 of
EPCRA requires owners or operators of certain facilities that
manufacture, process, or otherwise use listed toxic chemicals to
annually report their releases of these chemicals to each environmental
medium. The PPA mandates that section 313 covered facilities also
report on source reduction and recycling activities relating to the
toxic chemicals beginning with the 1991 reporting year. Since 1991
covered facilities have been providing this information to EPA in
section 8, Source Reduction and Recycling Activities, of EPA Form R. On
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48475), EPA proposed regulations which would
provide definitions and instructions for reporting thePPA data elements
on the EPA Form R. In this action, EPA will amend certain aspects of
the September 25, 1991, proposed rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/25/91 56 FR 48475
Notice of receipt 03/31/99 64 FR 15324
Response To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
[[Page 38281]]
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 2847. Formerly listed as RIN 2070-AC24.
Affected Sectors Include: Manufacturing industries in SIC codes 20-39
plus the following industries and SIC codes: Metal Mining (SIC code 10
except SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094); Coal Mining (SIC code 12 except
SIC code 1241); Electric Utilities (SIC codes 4911, 4931, 4939);
Commercial Hazardous Waste Treatment (SIC code 4953); Chemicals and
Allied Products-Wholesale (SIC code 5169); Petroleum Bulk Terminals and
Plants (SIC code 5171); and, Solvent Recovery Services (SIC code 7389).
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/tri
Agency Contact: John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0742
Fax: 202-566-0741
Email: dombrowski.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA09
_______________________________________________________________________
3365. CLARIFY TRI REPORTING OBLIGATIONS UNDER EPCRA SECTION 313 FOR THE
METAL MINING ACTIVITIES OF EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) currently requires
reporting from metal mining facilities if they manufacture or process
25,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical or otherwise use 10,000
pounds or more of a listed chemical. These mining facilities engage in
the removal of naturally occurring materials from the earth. EPA had
considered naturally occurring materials to be manufactured by natural
processes. A recent court order set aside EPA's interpretation of
manufacture stating that naturally occurring ores can not be
manufactured within the meaning of EPCRA section 313. EPA is
considering clarifying how the definitions of manufacturing and
processing under EPCRA section 313 apply to the mining sector processes
of extraction and beneficiation. This action will not affect the coal
extraction activities exemption.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/05
Final Action 09/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4616.
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/tri
Agency Contact: Marc Edmonds, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Environmental Information, 2844, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0758
Fax: 202 566-0741
Email: edmonds.marc@epamail.epa.gov
John Dombrowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2844T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0742
Fax: 202-566-0741
Email: dombrowski.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2025-AA11
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Emergency Planning and Community Right--to--Know Act (EPCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3366. TRADE SECRECY CLAIMS FOR EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-
TO-KNOW INFORMATION; AND TRADE SECRET DISCLOSURES TO HEALTH
PROFESSIONALS; AMENDMENT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 350.16; 40 CFR 350.17; 40 CFR 350.27
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/14/03 68 FR 64726
Direct Final 11/14/03 68 FR 64719
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob
Phone: 202-564-8019
Fax: 202 564-8233
Email: jacob.sicy@epamail.epa.gov
Larry Reisman
Phone: 202-566-0751
Fax: 202 564-0741
Email: reisman.larry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF1
[[Page 38282]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3367. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PHASE III:
DECHARACTERIZED WASTEWATERS, CARBAMATE WASTES, AND SPENT POTLINERS
(SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 610
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 148; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 403
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In April 1996, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
promulgated regulations establishing land disposal restrictions (LDR)
treatment standards for certain hazardous wastes (61 FR 15566 and 61 FR
15660, April 8, 1996). EPA issued the LDR regulations under the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act. They became effective on April 5, 1996. EPA did not
perform a regulatory flexibility analysis for this rule because, at
that time, no data on potentially affected small entities were
available. Also, due to the statutory requirements of the LDR program,
no legal avenues existed for the Agency to provide relief from the LDRs
for small entities.
This gives notice that EPA will review the LDR regulations pursuant to
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 USC 610). EPA solicits
comments on the continued need for the rule; the complexity of the
rule; the extent to which it overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with
other Federal, State, orlocal government rules; and the degree to which
technology, economic conditions, or other relevant factors have changed
since the rule was promulgated. This rule is statutorily required.
While EPA may be able to make amendments in accordance with comments
received, the rule may not be rescinded. EPA also will welcome comments
on any other aspect of the rule. In submitting comments, please
reference Docket ID number RCRA-2004-0004, and follow the instructions
provided in Unit G of the preambleto the Regulatory Agenda.
EPA continues to view this regulation as a vital component of efforts
to protect human health and the environment. EPA intends to continue to
require compliance with the regulation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Begin Review 06/00/04
End Comment Period 07/00/04
End Review 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4898.
Agency Contact: Rhonda Minnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8771
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: minnick.rhonda@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AG17
_______________________________________________________________________
3368. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PHASE II: UNIVERSAL
TREATMENT STANDARDS, AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR ORGANIC TOXICITY
CHARACTERISTIC WASTES AND NEWLY LISTED WASTES (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 5 USC 610
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 148; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR
265; 40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In September 1994, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
promulgated regulations establishing land disposal restrictions (LDR)
treatment standards for certain hazardous wastes (59 FR 47982,
September 19, 1994). EPA issued the LDR regulations under the Hazardous
and Solid Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act. They became effective on December 19, 1994. EPA did not perform a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this rule because, at that time, no
data on potentially affected small entities were available. Also, due
to the statutory requirements of the LDR program, no legal avenues
existed for the Agency to provide relief from the LDR's for small
entities.
This gives notice that EPA will review the LDR regulations pursuant to
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 USC 610). EPA solicits
comments on the continued need for the rule; the complexity of the
rule; the extent to which it overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with
other Federal, State, or local government rules; and the degree to
which technology, economic conditions, or other relevant factors have
changed since the rule was promulgated. This rule is statutorily
required. While EPA may be able to make amendments in accordance with
comments received, the rule may not be rescinded. EPA also will welcome
comments on any other aspect of the rule. In submitting comments,
please reference Docket ID number RCRA-2004-0003, and follow the
instructions provided in Unit G of the preamble to the Regulatory Agenda.
EPA continues to view this regulation as a vital component of efforts
to protect human health and the environment. EPA intends to continue to
require compliance with the regulation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Begin Review 06/00/04
End Comment Period 07/00/04
End Review 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4897.
Agency Contact: Rhonda Minnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8771
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: minnick.rhonda@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AG19
[[Page 38283]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3369. REVISIONS TO SOLID WASTE LANDFILL CRITERIA--LEACHATE RECIRCULATION
ON ALTERNATIVE LINERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6944; 42 USC 6949a
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA plans to propose a rule amending the Federal criteria for
municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLF) to allow leachate recirculation
over alternative liner systems which meet the performance standard
specified by the MSWLF criteria. The performance determination would be
made by the State director of an approved MSWLF program. EPA also plans
to propose a new section to the MSWLF criteria which will allow the
alternative of clean closure of landfills rather than require the
installation of a landfill cap, which would allow the solid waste in
the MSWLF to be totally removed from the site and be properly disposed
of at another site. Finally, EPA plans to propose an additional factor
for determining the frequency of ground water monitoring for the
detection monitoring program specified in this subpart. The additional
factor for consideration concerns liner performance where there is some
direct system for determining liner performance. However, the minimum
monitoring frequency would still be no less than once a year as stated
in the existing regulation.
The Federal role is to establish minimum protective criteria. This
proposal would allow additional flexibility for facility managers of
municipal landfills to achieve compliance with the criteria. By
providing additional flexibility this proposal will reduce potential
costs while providing alternative means of environmental protection.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NODA 04/06/00 65 FR 18014
NPRM 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4230.
Sectors Affected: 562 Waste Management and Remediation Services
Agency Contact: Craig Dufficy, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-9037
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: dufficy.craig@epamail.epa.gov
Deborah Hanlon, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-5824
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: hanlon.deborah@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE67
_______________________________________________________________________
3370. REVISIONS FOR TRANSBOUNDARY SHIPMENTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR
RECOVERY WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6901 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262 subpart H (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency is considering changing the existing regulation 40
CFR 262 subpart H, which regulates transboundary movement of hazardous
waste within all countries that are members of the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This is in response to the
fact that there is now approximately $30 to 40 billion in annual trade
among developed countries in waste recyclables, with the United States
having a positive trade balance. Because each of the developed
countries (the 30 OECD countries) had a different system for
controlling the exports and imports of waste, including recyclables,
the international recycling market was not as efficient as it could be.
A more streamlined, uniform system for exports and imports will also
increase recycling and lessen disposal. The United States was actively
involved in the negotiation of a legally binding OECD multilateral
agreement to create a more streamlined system. OECD member countries
are then obligated to transfer the terms of the multilateral agreement
to their domestic regulations in order for the multilateral agreement
to have legal authority. This regulation would be amended to comply
with changes passed by the OECD Council. Existing waste lists may be
restructured to comply with the new OECD waste lists. As such,
previously existing waste lists may be renamed according to adopted
OECD terminology. Shipments of small waste amounts destined for
laboratory analysis may be exempted from filing certain paperwork
requirements that are otherwise required. A certificate of recovery may
be required upon final recovery of wastes and timeframes for recovery
operations may be changed to reflect the decisions made by the OECD
Council. This needs to have a Federal solution because international
exports and imports are overseen at the Federal level due to the
foreign powers authority clause.
Many alternatives were considered by government and industry during the
intensive negotiations on the legally binding multilateral agreement,
with the United States having a great deal of influence over which
alternatives were in the final agreement. The Agency plans to codify
the streamlining provisions of the OECD multilateral agreement,
regulating exporters and importers of waste recyclables.
Exporters and importers of waste recyclables will need to implement the
international uniform procedures of the OECD multilateral agreement,
however these costs will be less than would be needed to deal with 30
different national export and import systems. In addition, some common
existing export and import procedures were streamlined so that the new
procedures are even more efficient than was common in the past. The
benefits are greater administrative efficiency for U.S. exporters and
importers in the international recycling market, and a lower level of
waste disposal in the United States since there is more efficient
access to other recycling markets.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/05
Direct Final 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4606.
[[Page 38284]]
Agency Contact: Maximo Diaz, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-0439
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: diaz.maximo@epamail.epa.gov
Frank Mcalister, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8196
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: mcalister.frank@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE93
_______________________________________________________________________
3371. RCRA SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL TEST CRITERIA (REVISION)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) ``RCRA 2002(a)''; 42 USC 6924 ``RCRA
3004''; 42 USC 6925 ``RCRA 3005''; 42 USC 6926 ``RCRA 3006''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 280; 40 CFR 761
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA's regulations require companies to provide financial
assurance for environmental obligations, and allow companies that meet
certain requirements to self insure their environmental obligations for
closure, post-closure care and third party liability. EPA proposed a
revised financial test because the revised test would be better at
predicting which firms will enter bankruptcy and not be able to cover
their financial assurance obligations at hazardous waste treatment,
storage and disposal facilities. If such a firm were to enter
bankruptcy, the government could incur the clean up liability.
EPA's regulations set the minimum national standards for state
hazardous waste programs, and so a change in federal requirements would
be necessary to ensure consistent improvements in the test. Without
rulemaking, states would have the option of not adopting these changes,
and so the improvement in the test would not be implemented in states
that cannot have regulations that are more stringent than Federal standards.
The proposal considered several alternative financial tests, and the
analysis supporting the original proposal found that the savings from
the proposed alternative would be $19 million in public and private
costs. If EPA promulgates a revised financial test, it may affect
companies that treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM Original 07/01/91 56 FR 30201
NPRM 10/12/94 59 FR 51523
NODA 12/00/04
Final 06/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 2647.
Sectors Affected: 325188 All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing; 325199 All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing;
33299 All Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing; 333999 All
Other General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing; 325998 All Other
Miscellaneous Chemical Product Manufacturing; 336399 All Other Motor
Vehicle Parts Manufacturing; 331311 Alumina Refining; 4411 Automobile
Dealers; 323110 Commercial Lithographic Printing; 334 Computer and
Electronic Product Manufacturing; 22111 Electric Power Generation;
332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing and Coloring;
325193 Ethyl Alcohol Manufacturing; 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power
Generation; 45431 Fuel Dealers; 4471 Gasoline Stations; 811111 General
Automotive Repair; 32512 Industrial Gas Manufacturing; 325131 Inorganic
Dye and Pigment Manufacturing; 33271 Machine Shops; 56292 Materials
Recovery Facilities; 333319 Other Commercial and Service Industry
Machinery Manufacturing; 32551 Paint and Coating Manufacturing; 32511
Petrochemical Manufacturing; 42271 Petroleum Bulk Stations and
Terminals; 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325211 Plastics Material and
Resin Manufacturing; 323114 Quick Printing; 22132 Sewage Treatment
Facilities; 48422 Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking,
Local; 311942 Spice and Extract Manufacturing; 336 Transportation
Equipment Manufacturing; 56211 Waste Collection; 56221 Waste Treatment
and Disposal
Agency Contact: Dale Ruhter, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5303W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8192
Fax: 703 308-8609
Email: ruhter.dale@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AC71
_______________________________________________________________________
3372. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS: DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT
FOR MACROENCAPSULATION OF RADIOACTIVE LEAD SOLIDS; DEFINITION OF
MACROENCAPSULATION
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6924
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 268.42
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA anticipates taking action to grant a national
determination of equivalent treatment petition at the request of the
Department of Energy. Currently the use of containers is prohibited for
the disposal of radioactive lead solids. This necessitates the
segregation and separation of radioactive lead solids from other
debris. Containers of high density polyethylene (HDPE) can be
constructed that provide a resistant barrier to degradation by the
wastes and materials into which it may come into contact after
disposal. We believe these changes in disposal practices will promote
more efficient cleanup of contaminated sites by removing a regulatory
distinction between radioactive lead solids and other forms of
hazardous debris, reduce worker exposures, and promote further
advancement in new technologies for disposal. The use of containers are
expected to be less costly than extrusion coatings and, therefore, this
action would be cost neutral to cost beneficial to the Department of
Energy and other generators of radioactive lead solids.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/04
Direct Final Rule 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
[[Page 38285]]
Additional Information: SAN 4743. Action is of equivalent regulatory
stringency. States and Tribes will not be required to adopt rule.
Agency Contact: Nicole Schindler, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-0146
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: schindler.nicole@epamail.epa.gov
Hugh Davis, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-306-0206
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: davis.hugh@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF12
_______________________________________________________________________
3373. RCRA INCENTIVES FOR PERFORMANCE TRACK MEMBERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 279
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Performance Track program provides recognition and
incentives for facilities that demonstrate to the Agency that they are
top environmental performers. Performance Track is a voluntary,
facility based program that reviews applicants twice a year for
conformance to four core criteria. These criteria are: a commitment to
continuous improvement, a well-functioning Environmental Management
system in place for at least one year, a solid record of compliance,
and a commitment to community outreach and annual public reporting.
Currently there are 344 members in Performance Track. In this action,
EPA plans to propose permit modifications, performance based standards
for tanks and generator standards, and reduced duplication between RCRA
and CAA standards. These incentives will be available only to
facilities that are members of the Performance Track program. Should a
facility choose to leave the program, any regulatory benefits they
receive will no longer be available. Performance Track facilities
commit to environmental improvements that reach beyond regulatory
compliance, and as such benefits are quantifiable via each member
facilities' annual report, and in aggregate through EPA's progress
reports on the program. In EPA's first Performance Track progress
report, member facilities collectively reduced: energy use by 1.1
million mmBtus, water use by 475 million gallons, hazardous materials
use by 908 tons, emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by 329
tons, emissions ofair toxics by 57 tons, emission of nitrogen oxides
(NOx) by 152 tons, discharges to water of biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total suspended solids (TSS)
by 1,227 tons, toxic discharges to water 5,543 tons, solid waste by
150,000 tons, and hazardous waste by 692 tons.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 12/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4828.
Agency Contact: Robert Sachs, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1808T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2884
Fax: 202-566-0966
Email: sachs.robert@.epa.gov
David Guest, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1808T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2872
Fax: 202 566-2985
Email: guest.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA34
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3374. STANDARDIZED PERMIT FOR RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42
USC 6927; 42 USC 6974
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 267; 40 CFR 270
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA has proposed creating a new type of general permit,
called a standardized permit, for facilities that generate waste and
routinely manage the waste on-site in tanks, containers, and
containment buildings. Under the standardized permit, facility owners
and operators would certify compliance with generic design and
operating conditions set on a national basis. The permitting agency
would review the certifications submitted by the facility owners and
operators. The permitting agency would alsobe able to impose additional
site-specific terms and conditions for corrective action or other
purposes, as called for by RCRA. Ensuring compliance with the
standardized permit's terms and conditions would occur during
inspection of the facility after the permit has been issued. The
standardized permit should streamline the permit process by allowing
facilities to obtain and modify permits more easily while maintaining
the protectiveness currently existing in the individual RCRA permit
process.EPA estimates that the potential average annual cost savings to
eligible facilities from implementation of this rule will range from
approximately $100 to $5,800 (i.e., 2 to 140 burden hours) per permit
action, depending on such things as the type of permit and the type of
storage equipment. The proposal raised issues for public comment on how
all facilities receiving RCRA permits can satisfy RCRA corrective
action requirements under appropriate alternative state cleanup
programs and on financial assurance issues. The Agency is developing a
final rule addressing this topic.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/12/01 66 FR 52192
Final Action 02/00/05
[[Page 38286]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4028.
Sectors Affected: 3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing; 332813
Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing and Coloring; 32551 Paint
and Coating Manufacturing; 32532 Pesticide and Other Agricultural
Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum Refineries; 325211 Plastics
Material and Resin Manufacturing; 3252 Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and
Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Jeff Gaines, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5303W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8655
Fax: 703-308-8609
Email: gaines.jeff@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE44
_______________________________________________________________________
3375. REVISIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE GUIDELINE FOR PROCUREMENT OF
PRODUCTS CONTAINING RECOVERED MATERIALS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) ``RCRA 6002(e)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 247
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: RCRA section 6002 and E.O. 13101 require EPA to prepare
guidelines in the Federal Register which designate items that are or
can be made with recovered materials and to issue recommendations for
government procurement of these items. Once designated, procuring
agencies are required to purchase these items with the highest
percentage of recovered materials practicable. Government procurement
of EPA-designated items containing recovered materials fosters markets
for recovered materials and, thereby, closes the recycling loop. To
date, EPA has designated 54 items under three Comprehensive Procurement
Guidelines (CPG1, CPG2 and CPG3). EPA has also issued a Recovered
Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) with each CPG which provides
recommendations on buying the designated items. The E.O. requires EPA
to update the CPG every two years. EPA will propose item designations
in CPG5. Shortly afterwards, EPA will issue final item designations in
CPG4. EPA recently published a Notice of Data Availability for a
prospective designation of nylon carpet.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice-PPRMA 06/08/98 63 FR 31214
Notice-RMAN1 06/08/98 63 FR 31217
NPRM 08/26/98 63 FR 45558
Final-CPG3-RMAN3 01/19/00 65 FR 3069
Notice-NAFD 01/19/00 65 FR 3082
NPRM- CPG4-RMAN4 08/28/01 66 FR 45256
Notice 07/16/03 68 FR 42040
NPRM-CPG5 12/10/03 68 FR 68813
Final-CPG4-RMAN4 04/30/04 69 FR 24028
Final CPG 5 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 3545.
Sectors Affected: 92111 Executive Offices; 92119 All Other General
Government
Agency Contact: Susan Nogas, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0199
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: nogas.sue@epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE23
_______________________________________________________________________
3376. METHODS INNOVATION RULE
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6926; 42 USC 6927; 42 USC
6930; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6936; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6938;
42 USC 6939; 42 USC 6974; 42 USC 9601; 42 USC 9614(c)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR
265; 40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 270; 40 CFR 279
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods (also known as SW-846) ensures the availability of
established, validated methods for the measurements and monitoring
needed for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program.
EPA's process for releasing analytical methods through the SW-846
methods compendium, which support the RCRA program, has been through
publishing FR notices and taking public comment. SW-846 methods are
widely used, but the majority of the methods are not required by any
particular regulation. Therefore, EPA has proposed a streamlined
process for releasing analytical methodologies to the public, while
also promoting the Performance Base Measurement Approach in the Methods
Innovation Proposed Rule (MIR). The comment period was extended until
February 28, 2003. In addition EPA has been working to break down the
barriers that the environmental monitoring community faces when trying
to use new monitoring techniques. As a first step, EA has accelerated
its review process for new methods by eliminating several unnecessary
internal review steps. However, there are currently 32 citations in
title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) where the use of SW-
846 methods is required. As a second step for speeding up the approval
process, EPA proposed to remove the requirements to use SW-846 methods
for other than method defined parameters (i.e., where the method
defines the regulations, such as the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure) from 40 CFR. This action will likely lead to an even more
streamlined approval process since SW-846 will then be able to be
handled strictly as guidance and not need the regulatory process for
approval. This additional streamlining will permit new, more cost-
effective methods to attain public and regulatory authority acceptance
in much less time, allowing required monitoring to be done more
cheaply, faster and, in some cases, more accurately.
Since many advances have occurred in waste sampling strategies since
initial guidance was published in 1984, along with the proposal EPA has
announced the availability of a new guidance document for public
comment entitled, ``RCRA Waste Sampling Draft Technical Guidance.'' One
main advantage to releasing the guidance is that the document provides
new approaches to waste sampling, with real life examples which we
expect will lead to improved
[[Page 38287]]
ability to characterize waste streams. We believe that the release of
this MIR and Waste Sampling Guidance will be widely accepted by the
regulated, scientific, and academic community because they provide
state of the art approaches for determining hazardous waste and
sampling characteristic techniques.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/30/02 67 FR 66252
Final Action 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3989.
Agency Contact: Kim Kirkland, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5307W, 5307W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-0490
Fax: 703 308-0511
Email: kirkland.kim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE41
_______________________________________________________________________
3377. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST REGULATION
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922 ``RCRA 3002''; 42 USC 6923 ``RCRA 3003'';
42 USC 6924 ``RCRA 3004''; 42 USC 6926 ``RCRA 3006''; PL 105-277;
``Government Paperwork Elimination Act 17''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 263; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR
265; 40 CFR 271
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (Form 8700-22) is a
multicopy form used to identify the quantity, composition, origin,
routing, and destination of hazardous waste during its transportation.
Waste handlers (e.g., generators and transporters) are required to use
the manifest, and States may not require a different manifest in its
place. However, the manifest has State blocks which allow States, at
their option, to require the entry of additional specific information
to serve their State's regulatory needs. Under the current regulations
more than 20 states print the manifest form in accordance with the
format specified in Federal regulations. However, the variability among
State manifest programs associated with state optional blocks,
different copy distribution schemes, and the manifest hierarchical
acquisition scheme has drawn complaints from the regulated community.
Variability among States' manifest programs and the manifest system's
current reliance on paper result in significant paperwork and cost
burden to waste handlers and States who choose to collect manifest
information. The Agency intends to standardize further the manifest
form elements, and to specify one format for the manifests that may be
used in all States. In addition, the Agency intends to announce
standard requirements for tracking rejected wastes, container residues,
and international shipments of hazardous wastes. Finally, the Agency
intends to pursue an optional approach that would use information
technologies to conduct the manifest process electronically, thereby
reducing paperwork burden, and improving the speed and accuracy of
preparing, transmitting, and recordkeeping the manifest form. However,
the Agency will bifurcate the manifest rule so that the form revisions
may be expedited, while additional analysis on the e-manifest continues.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/22/01 66 FR 28240
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 3147. Because of significant issues
identified during the public comment period on the electronic manifest
part of the rule, this part of the rule has been separated from the
form revisions part of the rule for purposes of publishing a final
action. The form revisions part of the rule will be finalized first,
while final action on the electronic manifest must await further
stakeholder outreach and analysis.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 2211 Electric Power
Generation, Transmission and Distribution; 332 Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing; 2122 Metal Ore Mining; 2111 Oil and Gas Extraction; 326
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 331 Primary Metal
Manufacturing; 323 Printing and Related Support Activities; 3221 Pulp,
Paper, and Paperboard Mills; 482 Rail Transportation; 484 Truck
Transportation; 5621 Waste Collection; 5622 Waste Treatment and
Disposal; 483 Water Transportation
Agency Contact: Rich Lashier, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8796
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: lashier.rich@epamail.epa.gov
Bryan Groce, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8750
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: groce.bryan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE21
_______________________________________________________________________
3378. OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE BURDEN REDUCTION INITIATIVE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6926; 42 USC 6927; 42 USC
6930; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6938; 42 USC 6939;
42 USC 6944; 42 USC 6949(a); 42 USC 6974; PL 104-13
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.38; 40 CFR 264.16; 40 CFR 264.52; 40 CFR
264.56; 40 CFR 264.73; 40 CFR 264.98 et seq; 40 CFR 265.16; 40 CFR
265.52; 40 CFR 265.56; 40 CFR 265.73; 40 CFR 265.98 et seq; 40 CFR
266.103; 40 CFR 261.4; 40 CFR 268.7; 40 CFR 268.9
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA plans to reduce the burden imposed by the RCRA reporting
and recordkeeping requirements to help meet the Federal Governmentwide
goal established by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
In June 1999, EPA published a Notice of Data Availability (NODA) in the
Federal Register (64 FR 32859) to seek comment on a number of burden
reduction ideas to eliminate duplicative and nonessential paperwork.
After reviewing the comments received on the NODA, EPA proposed (67 FR
2518, 1/17/02) to implement many of these
[[Page 38288]]
ideas. EPA issued a notice (68 FR 61662; 10/29/03) seeking further
input on a number of changes we proposed. EPA plans to finalize this
burden reduction effort.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NODA 1 06/18/99 64 FR 32859
NPRM 01/17/02 67 FR 2518
NODA 2 10/29/03 68 FR 61662
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4084. Applicable SIC codes: Chemicals and
Allied Products (28), Primary Metal Industries (33), Fabricated Metals
(34), Industrial Machinery and Equipment (35), Electrical Equipment
(36), Transportation Equipment (37), Other Manufacturing,
Transportation and Utilities (40-49), Wholesale Trade (50-51), Services
(70-89) and Other SIC Groups
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 334 Computer and
Electronic Product Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing; 326
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 331 Primary Metal
Manufacturing; 323 Printing and Related Support Activities; 562 Waste
Management and Remediation Services
Agency Contact: Robert Burchard, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8450
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: burchard.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE50
_______________________________________________________________________
3379. LISTING DETERMINATION AND LDR FOR WASTES GENERATED DURING THE
MANUFACTURE OF AZO, ANTHRAQUINONE, AND TRIARYLMETHANE DYES AND PIGMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921 ``RCRA 3001''; 42 USC 9602 ``CERCLA 102''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 148; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR
268; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 302
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, November 10, 2003, -.
Final, Judicial, February 15, 2005, -.
Abstract: This action is mandated by the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments and a consent decree (EDF v. Browner, Civil Action No. 89-
0598, D.D.C.). This action addresses the potential human health and
environmental risks posed by wastes from the manufacture of dyes and
pigments, and determines whether these wastes should be listed as
hazardous wastes under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) to control any potentially unacceptable risks. If listed under
RCRA, these wastes would alsobe added to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
On November 25, 2003, we proposed to list nonwastewaters from the
production of dyes and/or pigments when those wastes contain mass
loadings of any of eight specific organic constituents of concern above
proposed listing levels on an annual basis. We proposed a contingency
that would exempt these wastes if they are managed in landfills meeting
appropriate design criteria (so long as a mass loadinglevel for
toluene-2,4-diamine is not exceeded). This proposal will provide the
benefit of protecting human health and the environment. At the same
time, we are providing specific risk-reduction goals for industry,
which, if met, will significantly reduce the regulatory burden
associated with the listing determination. The estimated incremental
compliance costs for the proposal to the dyes and/or pigments
industries are in the range of $0.5 to $4.3 million per year, depending
on total waste quantity manage, nonconditional mass loading levels, and
the number of affected facilities. We expect impacts on small
businesses to be minimal.
The current action is a re-proposal of prior actions. We proposed
listing decisions for most of the targeted wastes in 1994, and several
other wastes in 1999. The 1994 and 1999 proposals were incomplete
because they did not contain information claimed to be confidential by
industry (the data are subject to an injunction prohibiting their
release). The current action does not rely on the contested data and
replaces the 1994 and 1999 proposals. The re-proposal also identifies
land disposal restrictions for the wastes of concern.
The current action is targeted on wastes from the manufacture of dyes
and pigments, with specific emphasis on certain product classes (azos,
anthraquinones, triarylmethanes). Manufacturers of these products will
need to assess their wastes to determine whether they meet the final
listing definitions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM-Dyes1 12/22/94 59 FR 66072
NPRM- Dyes 2 07/23/99 64 FR 40192
NPRM3 11/25/03 68 FR 66164
Final Action 02/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3066.
Sectors Affected: 325132 Organic Dye and Pigment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Gwen Dipietro, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8285
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: dipietro.gwen@epamail.epa.gov
Robert Kayser, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-7304
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: kayser.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AD80
_______________________________________________________________________
3380. RECYCLING OF CATHODE RAY TUBES (CRTS) AND MERCURY-CONTAINING
EQUIPMENT: CHANGES TO HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923;
42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 273
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will ultimately revise the existing Federal
hazardous waste regulations to encourage recycling and better
management of
[[Page 38289]]
Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) by providing a conditional exclusion from the
definition of solid waste for CRTs being recycled. A CRT is the display
component of a television or computer monitor. A CRT is made largely of
specialized glasses, some of which contain lead to protect the user
from X-rays inside the CRT. Due to the lead, when they are disposed of
or reclaimed, some CRTs are hazardous wastes under the Federal Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. This rule will also
streamline RCRA requirements for managing mercury-containing equipment
by adding such equipment to the universal waste rule. This rule is
planned in response to a June 9, 1998 recommendation on CRT recycling
from the Common Sense Initiative (CSI) Council to the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), and in response to a petition from the
Utilities Solid Waste Activities Group regarding mercury-containing
equipment. The goal of this action is to improve management and
encourage recycling, thereby minimizing disposal of mercury, increasing
resource recovery, and enhancing protection of human health and the
environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/12/02 67 FR 40507
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4092.
Sectors Affected: 334411 Electron Tube Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Marilyn Goode, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8800
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: goode.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE52
_______________________________________________________________________
3381. REVISION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXEMPTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE
MIXTURES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6924;
42 USC 6926
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A) to 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This revision to the wastewater treatment exemptions for
hazardous waste mixtures has been proposed to address inconsistencies
in the regulations, as well as provide regulatory relief. Current EPA
mixture rule exemptions have not kept up with more recent additions to
solvent listings, Clean Air Act regulations, wastewater treatment
technology, and policies affecting other hazardous wastes. Therefore,
the need exists for a Federal deregulatory solution to resolve these
inconsistencies. It is estimated that this rule, if finalized, will
save $11 to 49 million in compliance costs. EPA proposed to add two
solvents (benzene and 2-ethoxyethanol) to the hazardous waste
exemptions for mixtures of spent solvents in wastewater treatment
plants (headworks rule) at 40 CFR 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A) - (B). EPA
proposed not to take action on two other solvents, 2-nitropropane and
1,1,2-trichloroethane. In addition, EPA has proposed (1) changing the
implementation of the rule from using mass balance only, to choice of
using direct monitoring; (2) revising the types of facilities and the
types of wastes eligible for the de minimis exemption under section
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(D); and clarifying the applicability of the exemption
to scrubber waters from the incineration of spent solvents. Facilities
affected by this action include industrial facilities with on-site
wastewater treatment plants, commercial wastewater treatment
facilities, and certain Federal facilities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/08/03 68 FR 17234
Final Action 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4501. This rule has been nominated for
reform in OMB's Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of
Regulation, Appendix A. OMB has given it a high priority level.
Sectors Affected: 31-33 Manufacturing; 562 Waste Management and
Remediation Services
URL For Public Comments:
www.epa.gov/edocket
Agency Contact: Lisa Lauer, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-7418
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: lauer.lisa@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE84
_______________________________________________________________________
3382. NESHAPS: STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR HAZARDOUS
WASTE COMBUSTORS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6924 ``RCRA 3004''; 42 USC 6925 ``RCRA 3005'';
42 USC 7412 ``CAA 112''; 42 USC 7414 ``CAA 114''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 270
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, March 31, 2004, Consent decree for
Phase 2 portion of rule.
Final, Judicial, June 15, 2005, Consent decree.
Abstract: On September 30, 1999, EPA promulgated standards to control
emissions of hazardous air pollutants from incinerators, cement kilns,
and lightweight aggregate kilns that burn hazardous waste (referred to
as the Phase I Rule). A number of parties, representing interests of
both industry and the environmental community, sought judicial review
of the rule. The Court ruled against EPA and vacated the Phase I rule.
On October 19, 2001, EPA, together with all petitioners, filed a joint
motion asking the Court to stay the issuance of its mandate to allow
them time to develop interim standards. These stop-gap interim
standards were promulgated on February 13 and 14, 2002. They replace
the vacated standards temporarily, until revised replacement standards
are promulgated by June 15, 2005. EPA will ultimately finalize the
Phase I replacement standards. Also, EPA is developing emission
standards for hazardous waste burning industrial, institutional,
commercial boilers, process heaters, and hydrochloric acid production
furnaces. These sources are referred to as Phase II Sources because the
standards were originally scheduled to be promulgated after Phase I source
[[Page 38290]]
standards were finalized; however, a separate consent decree now
requires us to finish developing emission standards for the Phase II
sources by the same date as those for Phase I (June 15, 2005). EPA has
developed options for calculating the emission standards that are
considered to be consistent with both the statutory requirements and
the opinion of the Court. EPA has proposed emission standards and
compliance provisions for both the Phase I and Phase II sources.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM-CK 04/19/96 61 FR 17358
Final-Fasttrack 06/19/98 63 FR 33782
Final-CK 09/30/99 64 FR 52828
NODA 07/27/00 65 FR 39581
DF 1 07/03/01 66 FR 35087
NPRM-Phase1 07/03/01 66 FR 35126
Parallel Proposal 07/03/01 66 FR 35124
Direct Final Action 10/15/01 66 FR 52361
Final Compliance Exten. 12/06/01 66 FR 63313
Interim Final Action 02/13/02 67 FR 6792
Final HAP 02/14/02 67 FR 6968
NPRM-Phases 1&2 04/20/04 69 FR 21197
Final Action 06/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3333. For information on the Phase I
portion of this effort, see SAN 4418, RIN 2050-AE79.
Sectors Affected: 3335 -; 3343 Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing;
3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing; 3273 Cement and Concrete Product
Manufacturing; 3271 Clay Product and Refractory Manufacturing; 3328
Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating and Allied Activities; 3342
Communications Equipment Manufacturing; 3341 Computer and Peripheral
Equipment Manufacturing; 2211 Electric Power Generation, Transmission
and Distribution; 45431 Fuel Dealers; 3332 Industrial Machinery
Manufacturing; 3274 Lime, Gypsum and Gypsum Product Manufacturing; 3327
Machine Shops, Turned Product, and Screw, Nut and Bolt Manufacturing;
3362 Motor Vehicle Body and Trailer Manufacturing; 3361 Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing; 3363 Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing; 2123 Non-
Metallic Mineral Mining and Quarrying; 3259 Other Chemical Product
Manufacturing; 3329 Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing; 3339
Other General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing; 3279 Other Nonmetallic
Mineral Product Manufacturing; 3255 Paint, Coating, Adhesive, and
Sealant Manufacturing; 3253 Pesticide, Fertilizer and Other
Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing; 3241 Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing; 4227 Petroleum and Petroleum Products Wholesalers; 3254
Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing; 3231 Printing and Related
Support Activities; 5629 Remediation and Other Waste Management
Services; 3252 Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial and Synthetic
Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing; 3344 Semiconductor and Other
Electronic Component Manufacturing; 22132 Sewage Treatment Facilities;
5622 Waste Treatment and Disposal
Agency Contact: Rhonda Minnick, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8771
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: minnick.rhonda@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE01
_______________________________________________________________________
3383. PROJECT XL -- ORTHO-MCNEIL PILOT PROJECT ALLOWING ON-SITE
TREATMENT OF LOW-LEVEL MIXED WASTES WITHOUT RCRA PERMIT
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6924(y); 42 USC 6938
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This site-specific rulemaking would allow Ortho-McNeil
Pharmaceutical (OMP) to treat small volumes of low-level mixed wastes
on-site using a bench-scale catalytic oxidizing treatment unit as an
alternative to long-term storage and off-site transportation and land
disposal at a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-licensed, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act permitted Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Facility. This treatment effectively destroys the organic component of
the wastestream, yielding a residual that is only a low-level
radioactive waste and can be disposed at an NRC-licensed low-level
radioactive waste disposal facility. OMP is also working with various
companies to develop and test recovery technologies that could be used
in lieu of disposal.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/24/01 66 FR 38395
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4439.
Agency Contact: Sandra Panetta, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1807, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2184
Fax: 202 566-2218
Email: panetta.sandra@epamail.epa.gov
Donna Perla, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1802, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2177
Fax: 202 566-2200
Email: perla.donna@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA14
_______________________________________________________________________
3384. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR THE IBM SEMICONDUCTOR
MANUFACTURING FACILITY IN HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NEW YORK
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6924(y); 42 USC 6938
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.4(a)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rulemaking provides a site-specific exclusion from the
regulatory definition of solid waste for certain wastewater treatment
sludges (otherwise designated as Hazardous Waste No. F006) when they
are used as ingredients in the production of cement. Without this
exclusion, the sludges being legitimately recycled as substitutes for
raw materials would remain subject to hazardous waste regulatory
requirements, including the need for a storage permit by the cement
manufacturer, which is a major disincentive to recycling the sludges in
this manner. This XL project tests the
[[Page 38291]]
presumption that these sludges can be safely recycled without
regulatory oversight.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/06/01 66 FR 30349
Supplemental NPRM 04/14/03 68 FR 18042
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4565.
Agency Contact: Sandra Panetta, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1807, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2184
Fax: 202 566-2218
Email: panetta.sandra@epamail.epa.gov
Andrew Baca, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 5301W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-6787
Fax: 703 308-0513
Email: baca.andrew@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA29
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3385. MANAGEMENT OF CEMENT KILN DUST (CKD)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a) ``RCRA 2002(a)''; 42 USC 6921(a) ``RCRA
3001(a)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 256; 40 CFR 259; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 264
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In December 1993, EPA submitted a Report to Congress with its
findings on the nature and management practices associated with cement
kiln dust (CKD). In 1995, EPA determined that some additional control
of CKD was needed and published a regulatory determination (60 FR 7366,
2/7/95). On August 20, 1999, EPA issued a proposed rule (64 FR 45632)
outlining the Agency's preferred regulatory approach (i.e., an
exemption from hazardous waste listing for properly managed CKD) and
several optional approaches including requirements solely under RCRA
subtitle D. On July 25, 2002, the Agency published a notice (67 FR
48648) to announce the availability for public inspection and comment
of recently acquired data on CKD.
The Agency is now considering an approach whereby it would finalize the
proposed option of issuing the protective CKD management standards as
described in the August 20, 1999 proposal as a RCRA subtitle D rule.
The Agency would temporarily suspend its active consideration of the
proposed listing of mismanaged CKD as a hazardous waste, and assess how
CKD management practices and state regulatory programs evolve over the
next three to five years. Based on this assessment, EPA will then
proceed to either formally withdraw or promulgate the portion of the
1999 proposal that classifies as a RCRA hazardous waste CKD that has
been egregiously mismanaged.
EPA will be promoting pollution prevention, recycling, and safer
disposal of CKD by considering finalization of protective management
standards for this waste. The Agency believes that these management
standards are a creative, affordable, and common sense approach that
can protect human health and the environment without imposing
unnecessary regulatory burdens on the cement kiln industry. These
standards provide a new, tailored framework that safeguards ground
water and limits risk from releases of dust to air.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Regulatory Determination 02/07/95 60 FR 7366
NPRM 08/20/99 64 FR 45632
Notice - Extend Comment Period 10/28/99 64 FR 58022
NODA 1 07/25/02 67 FR 48648
Notice-Extend Comment Period 11/08/02 67 FR 68130
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 3856.
Sectors Affected: 32731 Cement Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Anthony Carrell, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-0458
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: carrell.anthony@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Souders, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8431
Fax: 703-308-8686
Email: souders.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE34
_______________________________________________________________________
3386. STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COAL COMBUSTION WASTES GENERATED
BY COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCERS
Priority: Economically Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907(a)(3); 42 USC 6944(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is for the development of non-hazardous waste
regulations under subtitle D of the RCRA statute. The regulations will
apply to landfill and surface impoundment facilities that manage coal
combustion wastes generated by steam electric power generators, i.e.,
electric utilities and independent power producers. This action results
from EPA's regulatory determination for fossil fuel combustion wastes
(see 65 FR 32214, May 22, 2000), which concluded that waste management
regulations underRCRA are appropriate for certain coal combustion
wastes. The utility industry has made significant improvement in its
waste management
[[Page 38292]]
practices over recent years, and most state regulatory programs are
similarly improving. However, public comment and other analyses have
convinced the Agency that coal combustion wastes could pose significant
risks to human health and the environment if they are not properly
managed. There is sufficient evidence that adequate controls may not be
in place. For example, 62 percent of existing utility impoundments do
not have groundwater monitoring; thus, their impact on ground and
surface waters cannot be evaluated in light of numerous damage cases
identified by the Agency that involve management of these wastes. The
intended benefits of this action will be to prevent contamination or
damage to ground waters and surface waters, thereby avoiding risk to
human health and the environment, including ecological risks. The
Agency is currently analyzing the human health and eco risks, costs,
and economic impact of this action as it develops the proposed
regulation. The Agency has considered alternatives to this action,
including regulating these wastes as hazardous wastes under subtitle C
of RCRA, but has rejected this approach as discussed in the regulatory
determination (see 65 FR 32214, May 22, 2000). EPA has also considered
issuing guidance instead of regulations to industry and state and local
governments to focus on these remaining waste management issues but
concluded that there will probably continue to be some gaps in
practices and controls and is concerned at the possibility that these
will go undressed. The Agency also believes the timeframe for
improvement of current practices is likely to be longer in the absence
of federal regulation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/07
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4470. This rule may also impact federal,
state, local or tribal governments that own coal-burning commercial
electric power generating facilities.
Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation
Agency Contact: Alexander Livnat, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-7251
Fax: 703-308-8686
Email: livnat.alexander@epamail.epa.gov
Steve Souders, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8431
Fax: 703-308-8686
Email: souders.steve@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE81
_______________________________________________________________________
3387. STANDARDS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COAL COMBUSTION WASTES--NON-POWER
PRODUCERS AND MINEFILLING
Priority: Economically Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907(a)(3); 42 USC 6944
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is for the development of non-hazardous waste
regulations under subtitle D of the RCRA statute. The regulations will
apply to landfill and surface impoundment facilities that manage coal
combustion wastes generated by non-utility combustors. Non-utility
combustors are commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities
that burn coal in boilers to generate steam. The regulations will also
apply to mine facilities where any coal combustion wastes are managed,
(i.e., backfilled into mined areas). This action results from EPA's
regulatory determination for fossil fuel combustion wastes (see 65 FR
32214, May 22, 2000), in which the Agency concluded that coal
combustion wastes could pose significant risks to human health and the
environment if they are not properly managed. As described in the
regulatory determination, there is sufficient evidence that adequate
controls may not be in place. The intended benefits of this action will
be to prevent contamination or damage to ground waters and surface
waters, thereby avoiding risk to human health and the environment,
including ecological risks. The Agency has completed information
collection efforts and is currently analyzing this information. The
Agency will also analyze the human health and eco risks, costs, and
economic impact of this action as it develops the proposed regulations.
The Agency has considered alternatives to this action, including
regulating these wastes as hazardous wastes under subtitle C of RCRA,
buthas rejected this approach as discussed in the regulatory
determination (see 65 FR 32214, May 22, 2000). EPA has also considered
issuing guidance to industry and state and local governments to focus
on the waste management issues but concluded that there will probably
continue to be some gaps in practices and controls and is concerned at
the possibility that these will go undressed. The Agency is considering
alternatives to regulation of mine placement under RCRA per this
action, including consulting with the U.S. Department of the Interior
on appropriate measures under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act (SMCRA) or some combination of both SMCRA and RCRA.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/07
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4469. This rule may also impact Federal,
State, local or tribal governments that own/operate coal-burning
facilities (excluding facilities that primarily generate electric power
for sale) or coal mines that accept coal combustion wastes.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 2121 Coal Mining; 22112
Electric Power Transmission, Control and Distribution; 311 Food
Manufacturing; 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing; 62
Health Care and Social Assistance; 322 Paper Manufacturing; 331 Primary
Metal Manufacturing; 313 Textile Mills;
[[Page 38293]]
336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Bonnie Robinson, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5306W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8429
Fax: 703-308-8686
Email: robinson.bonnie@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE83
_______________________________________________________________________
3388. REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS OIL-BEARING SECONDARY MATERIALS FROM
PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY AND OTHER HAZARDOUS SECONDARY MATERIALS
PROCESSED IN A GASIFICATION SYSTEM TO PRODUCE SYNTHESIS GAS-FINAL RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6926; 42 USC 6927; 42 USC
6930; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6938; 42 USC 6939;
42 USC 6974
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering
finalizing revisions to the RCRA hazardous regulations to exclude oil-
bearing secondary materials, generated by the petroleum refining
industry and others, from the definition of solid waste if the
materials are destined to be processed in a gasification device
manufacturing synthesis gas fuel. We are considering this exclusion in
order to clarify and simplify RCRA jurisdiction, and to be consistent
with other comparable existing exclusions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/25/02 67 FR 13684
Final Action 06/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4411. This is an extension of a previous
notice that contained the following RIN 2050-AD88.
Agency Contact: Larry Gonzalez, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8605
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: gonzalez.larry@epamail.epa.gov
William Brandes, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8871
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: brandes.william@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE78
_______________________________________________________________________
3389. RCRA BURDEN REDUCTION INITIATIVE, PHASE 2
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921 to 6927; 42
USC 6930; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6937 to 6939; 42 USC 6944;
42 USC 6949(a); 42 USC 6974; PL 104-13
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260.31; 40 CFR 261.4; 40 CFR 261.38; 40 CFR
264.16; 40 CFR 264.52; 40 CFR 264.56; 40 CFR 264.73; 40 CFR 264.98 et
seq; 40 CFR 265.16; 40 CFR 265.52; 40 CFR 265.56; 40 CFR 265.73; 40 CFR
265.98 et seq; 40 CFR 266.103; 40 CFR 268.7, 268.9; 40 CFR 270.16,
270.17
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: As part of its response to the Paperwork Reduction Act, EPA
formed the RCRA Burden Reduction Initiative. The Agency is reviewing
additional Burden Reduction opportunities, some of which were proposed
but not included in the Burden Reduction Initiative final rule.
Additionally, EPA will look for opportunities for burden reduction
within the Biennial Report. Moving from a paper system to an electronic
system focused on information gathered and generated by Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities may provide for significant Burden
Reduction savings.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4735.
Agency Contact: Robert Burchard, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5302W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8450
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: burchard.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF01
_______________________________________________________________________
3390. E-CYCLING PILOT PROJECT FOR REGION 3 STATES (ECOS); STREAMLINING
RCRA REGULATIONS TO ENCOURAGE REUSE, RECYCLING, AND RECOVERY OF
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922;
42 USC 6924(y); 42 USC 6938
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.4(a)(24); 40 CFR 261.40
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This project is the result of an Environmental Council of
States (ECOS) partnership agreement that EPA Region 3 entered into with
the six state environmental agencies. As part of the partnership
agreement, the Region agreed to prepare a regional rule and to expedite
its promulgation by using the direct final rulemaking process. By using
this innovative approach to have a regional e-Cycling Pilot Project,
EPA Region 3 and the Mid-Atlantic States (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV) will
be able to provide additional information about EPA's national proposed
cathode ray tube (CRTs) exclusion from the definition of solid waste
(e.g., CRTs are the video display components of televisions and
computer monitors). The Regional e-Cycling Pilot Project could serve as
a model for electronic recycling nationwide and the states believe that
the recycling program will function effectively as a result of this
regulatory flexibility.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/26/02 67 FR 78761
Direct Final Rule 12/26/02 67 FR 78718
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule 02/24/03 68 FR 8553
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
[[Page 38294]]
Additional Information: SAN 4701.
Agency Contact: Marie Holman, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional
Office Philadelphia, 3EI00, Philadelphia, PA 19107
Phone: 215-814-5463
Fax: 215 814-2782
Email: holman.marie@epamail.epa.gov
Sandra Panetta, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office
Philadelphia, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2184
Fax: 202 566-2218
Email: panetta.sandra@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2003-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________
3391. FINAL DETERMINATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE TOXICITY
CHARACTERISTIC RULE TO PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS FROM
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921 ``RCRA 3001''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: In the final hazardous waste Toxicity Characteristic (TC)
rule published in June 1990, EPA decided to temporarily defer
application of the TC rule to petroleum-contaminated media and debris,
such as soils and groundwater, that result from underground storage
tank (UST) corrective actions. This rule is part of the Agency's
commitment to make a final determination regarding the UST temporary
deferral. The temporary deferral was, in part, based on the Agency's
concern that without such a deferral,UST cleanup procedures would be
adversely affected, resulting in delays in remedial action and
increases in remediation costs. Since this action is deregulatory,
there are no adverse effects on small businesses, or on State, local,
or tribal governments.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/12/93 58 FR 8504
Final Action 12/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3189.
Agency Contact: Sammy Ng, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, 5401G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-7166
Fax: 202 603-0175
Email: ng.sammy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AD69
_______________________________________________________________________
3392. MODIFICATIONS TO RCRA RULES ASSOCIATED WITH SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED
INDUSTRIAL WIPES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA proposed to modify the RCRA regulations for management of
solvent-contaminated industrial wipes in response to stakeholder
concerns that industrial wipes are over-regulated because they pose
little threat to human health and the environment. Industrial wipes are
used with solvents across industry in various ways; EPA estimates that
there are approximately 471,000 users of industrial wipes in 13
economic subsectors, but many users use small numbers of wipes with
small amounts of solvents on them.
If finalized, this regulation would provide regulatory relief for two
types of solvent-contaminated industrial wipes: (1) disposable wipes,
which are disposed of in a landfill or by combustion after use, and (2)
reusable wipes, which are laundered after use to remove the solvent and
then are used again. EPA proposed to conditionally exclude disposable
industrial wipes from the definition of hazardous waste and to
conditionally exclude reusable industrial wipes from the definition of
solid waste.
The regulation, if finalized, is estimated to result in $34 million of
savings throughout the economy and has been developed with conditions
to ensure that management of these solvents remains protective of human
health and the environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/20/03 68 FR 65586
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4091.
Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 334 Computer and
Electronic Product Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing; 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing; 333
Machinery Manufacturing; 441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers; 812
Personal and Laundry Services; 323 Printing and Related Support
Activities; 811 Repair and Maintenance; 336 Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Katherine Blanton, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-605-0761
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: blanton.katherine@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE51
_______________________________________________________________________
3393. INCREASE METALS RECLAMATION FROM F006 WASTE STREAMS
Priority: Other Significant
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Many metal finishers and other industrial sectors generate an
electroplating sludge as part of their production process that is
amenable to recycling; i.e., the sludge contains economically
recoverable amounts of metals such as copper, nickel, zinc, etc.
Currently, these sludges (F006) are listed hazardous wastes subject to
RCRA regulations. Many generators continue to send these sludges for
treatment and disposal when they could be recycled. Similarly,
generators currently sending their sludges for recycling receive no
economic benefit for this practice. Since the mid-1990's, EPA has been
working with industry and the States to create incentives for safe
recycling and has promulgated rules to foster this practice. However,
EPA is interested in exploring whether further regulatory changes are
warranted.
EPA is currently evaluating several options that would provide regulatory
[[Page 38295]]
relief to generators and handlers of F006. All options would reduce
regulatory costs to generators and handlers relative to the current
RCRA Subtitle C regulatory program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4651.
Agency Contact: Jim O'Leary, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8827
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: oleary.jim@epamail.epa.gov
James Michael, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8610
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: michael.james@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE97
_______________________________________________________________________
3394. REVISIONS TO THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6903``RCRA Section 1004''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.2
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Under RCRA, to be a hazardous waste, a material must also be
a solid waste. EPA's framework for determining whether a material is a
solid waste is based on what the material is, and how it's managed
(e.g., how it is used, reused, etc.). For materials being recycled,
RCRA jurisdiction is complex and the history of legal decisions related
to the definition of solid waste is extensive. Primarily, in response
to American Mining Congress v. EPA, 824 F. 2d 1177(D.C. Cir. 1987)
(``AMC I'') and one of the most recent decisions, the Association of
Battery Recyclers, v. EPA 208 F.3d 1047 (2000) (``ABR''), EPA has
proposed to revise the definition of solid waste. We specifically
addressed materials undergoing reclamation. In the context of
reclamation, we discussed options for how to distinguish materials that
are discarded from materials that remain in use in a continuous process
in the generating industry. The rule would also establish criteria for
determining whether or not hazardous secondary materials are recycled
legitimately.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/28/03 68 FR 61558
Final Action 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4670. Nominated for reform in OMB's Report
to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Regulations, Appendix A to
revise the definition of solid waste rule to grant an exemption from
RCRA for materials destined for recycling or reuse. OMB has given it a
medium priority level.
Agency Contact: Marilyn Goode, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8800
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: goode.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov
Ingrid Rosencrantz, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-605-0709
Fax: 703 308-0522
Email: rosencrantz.ingrid@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE98
_______________________________________________________________________
3395. REVISIONS OF THE LEAD-ACID BATTERY EXPORT NOTIFICATION AND CONSENT
REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6901 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR subpart G 266.80 (a)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Currently, generators, transporters and facilities that
reclaim but do not store spent lead-acid batteries are exempt from
hazardous waste management requirements, as specified in 40 CFR Part
266 subpart G. Spent lead-acid batteries destined for export/
reclamation are not, therefore, subject to RCRA manifesting or export
notification and consent requirements specified in 40 CFR Part 262.
Allowing the export of spent lead-acid batteries without prior notice
and consent of the receiving country is not consistent with widely-
accepted international practices. Similarly, the exemption contrasts
with more recent Universal Waste requirements in 40 CFR Part 262, which
require export notice and consent for comparable waste streams. The
purpose of this regulation is to modify the spent lead-acid battery
exemption to require appropriate notice and consent for those batteries
intended for export.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 4778.
Agency Contact: Marilyn Goode, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8800
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: goode.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov
Frank Mcalister, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8196
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: mcalister.frank@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF06
_______________________________________________________________________
3396. REGULATORY AMENDMENTS TO THE F019 HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING TO
EXCLUDE THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM THE CHEMICAL CONVERSION
COATING PROCESS (ZINC PHOSPHATING) OF AUTOMOBILE BODIES OF ALUMINUM
Priority: Other Significant
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 1006 et seq
[[Page 38296]]
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.31; 40 CFR 302.4
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Automobile manufacturers are adding aluminum or aluminized
components to automobiles to reduce the weight of vehicles to increase
fuel economy. When aluminum components are added to the automobile
assembly process, the current federal regulations require that the
wastewater treatment sludges generated from this conversion coating
process be managed as a hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act. EPA intends to reduce burden on the regulated
community by revising the current RCRA regulations that apply to the
wastewater treatment sludges from the chemical conversion coating (zinc
phosphating) of aluminum.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4834.
Agency Contact: James Michael, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8610
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: michael.james@epamail.epa.gov
GailAnn Cooper, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8419
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: cooper.gailann@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AG15
_______________________________________________________________________
3397. STREAMLINING LABORATORY WASTE MANAGEMENT IN ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH
LABORATORIES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Laboratory Initiative is focusing on ways to make the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act a better fit for the laboratory
setting and to improve reuse, recycling, and the overall management of
chemicals in the laboratory settings. EPA recognizes the unique aspects
of research and academic laboratories compared with large manufacturing
processes. For example, research and academic laboratories generate
small amounts of many different wastes while large manufacturing
processes tend to generate large amounts of a few wastes. Our goal is
to improve the program to better protect human health and the
environment, through standards that are harmonious with the way
laboratories operate. Our aim is to improve compliance, not by relaxing
the standards, but by improving the fit through regulatory changes to
part 262.34.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4920. No legal deadline.
Agency Contact: Patricia Mercer, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5304W, Washington DC, DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8408
Fax: 703 308-0514
Email: mercer.patricia@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AG18
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3398. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PERMITS FOR MUNICIPAL
SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major under 5 USC 801.
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258.4
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 03/22/04 69 FR 13242
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local
Agency Contact: Dwight Hlustick
Phone: 703-308-8647
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: hlustick.dwight@epamail.epa.gov
Deborah Hanlon
Phone: 703-308-5824
Fax: 703 308-8686
Email: hanlon.deborah@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE92
_______________________________________________________________________
3399. PROJECT XL SITE-SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
MILLERSVILLE LANDFILL, SEVERN, MARYLAND
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn 06/10/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Local, State
Agency Contact: Steven Donohue
Phone: 215-814-3215
Fax: 215 814-2782
Email: donohue.steven@epamail.epa.gov
Sherri Walker
Phone: 202-566-2186
Fax: 202 566-2218
Email: walker.sherri@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2090-AA25
[[Page 38297]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Oil Pollution Act (OPA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3400. REVISIONS TO THE SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND
COUNTERMEASURES (SPCC) RULE
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321 ``CWA sec 311(j)(l)(C)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency issued a ``Notice
Concerning Certain Issues Pertaining to the July 2002 Spill Prevention,
Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule'' to publish clarifications
developed by the Agency during the course of settlement proceedings
regarding the SPCC regulation. These clarifications to the SPCC
regulation were the result of legal challenges to certain aspects of
the July 17, 2002 final regulation.
EPA is issuing a proposed rule to extend by one year the compliance
deadline for regulated facilities to amend (or in some cases, prepare)
and implement their SPCC Plans. This extension will provide sufficient
time for the regulated community to undertake the actions necessary to
update (or prepare) their plans in accordance with recent
clarifications EPA has made to certain provision of the SPCC
regulations. The extension also avoids a potentially overwhelming
number of individual extension requests. EPA will also issue a proposed
rule extending by an additional two years the compliance deadline for
certain groups of the regulated community. EPA is considering
additional measures to ease the compliance burden of smaller
facilities, and for oil-filled and motive power equipment.
EPA is considering a proposal to amend 40 CFR Part 112, which includes
the SPCC rule promulgated under the authority of the Clean Water Act.
The proposal may also include advanced notices of proposed rulemaking
on secondary containment for small electrical equipment and on
secondary containment requirements for loading racks. Part 112 includes
requirements for SPCC Plans, and for Facility Response Plans (FRPs).
The proposed rule includes changes stemming from the litigation over
the SPCC rule, as well as other changes, that have not been fully
defined. These may include potential differentiation of requirements
for non-petroleum oils, and policy statements associated with the July
2002 SPCC final rule. Among these are the following possible areas: 1)
Applicability ofthe rule to motive power; 2) Secondary containment and
consideration of costs; 3) Wastewater and the applicability of the rule
to oil-water separators; 4) Loading/unloading areas vs. rack; 5)
Wastewater exemption at production facilities; 6) Applicability of the
rule to mobile/portable containers; 7) Applicability of the rule to
various forms of piping; 8) Scope and definition of operational
equipment vs. process vessels; 9) Distinction between the various
secondary containment requirements; and 10) Integrity testing for small
bulk containers. Specific decisions on the scope of the rulemaking will
follow analysis of flexibility available under the July 2002 rule to
support pending policy clarifications.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice of Settlement Terms 05/25/04 69 FR 29728
1 yr Compliance Extension NPRM 06/00/04
2 year Compliance Extension
Proposal 07/00/04
1 yr Compliance Extension Final 08/00/04
2 Year Compliance Extension
Final 04/00/05
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 2634.2. Split from RIN 2050-AC62.
Agency Contact: Hugo Fleischman, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5203G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-8769
Fax: 703 603-9116
Email: fleischman.hugo@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AG16
_______________________________________________________________________
3401. NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST FOR UNCONTROLLED HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES:
PROPOSED AND FINAL RULES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9605 ``CERCLA 105''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300.425
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will revise the sites included on the National
Priorities List (NPL) of uncontrolled waste sites in the National
Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA requires that the Agency revise the NPL
at least annually. Periodic revisions will allow EPA to include sites
on the NPL with known or threatened hazardous substance releases and to
delete sites that have been cleaned up.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final 20 03/06/98 63 FR 11332
NPRM 24 03/06/98 63 FR 11340
Final 21 07/28/98 63 FR 40182
NPRM 25 07/28/98 63 FR 40247
Final Tex-Tin 09/18/98 63 FR 49855
Final 22 09/29/98 63 FR 51848
NPRM 26 09/29/98 63 FR 51882
Final 23 01/19/99 64 FR 2942
NPRM 27 01/19/99 64 FR 2950
NPRM Midnight Mine 02/16/99 64 FR 7564
NPRM 28 04/23/99 64 FR 19968
Final 24 05/10/99 64 FR 24949
NPRM Almeda 05/10/99 64 FR 24990
Final 25 07/22/99 64 FR 39878
NPRM 29 07/22/99 64 FR 39886
NPRM 30 10/22/99 64 FR 56992
Final Action 10/22/99 64 FR 56966
Final 26 02/04/00 65 FR 5435
NPRM 31 02/04/00 65 FR 5468
Final 28 05/11/00 65 FR 30482
NPRM 32 05/11/00 65 FR 30489
Final 29 07/27/00 65 FR 46096
NPRM 33 07/27/00 65 FR 46131
NPRM Alabama/Malone 08/24/00 65 FR 51567
Final 30 12/01/00 65 FR 75179
NPRM 34 12/01/00 65 FR 75215
NPRM 35 01/11/01 66 FR 2380
Final 31 06/14/01 66 FR 32235
NPRM 36 06/14/01 66 FR 32287
Final 32 09/13/01 66 FR 47583
NPRM 37 09/13/01 66 FR 47612
NPRM Libby/Omaha 02/26/02 67 FR 8836
Final adds 19 sites 09/05/02 67 FR 56757
NPRM 38 09/05/02 67 FR 56794
Final Action- 10/24/02 67 FR 65315
Final Action-- 04/30/03 68 FR 23077
NPRM- 04/30/03 68 FR 23094
Final 35 (adds 12 sites) 09/29/03 68 FR 55875
NPRM 05/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local
Additional Information: SAN 3439.
Agency Contact: Yolanda Singer, Environmental Protection Agency,
[[Page 38298]]
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-8835
Fax: 703 603-9100
Email: singer.yolanda@epamail.epa.gov
Terry Jeng, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-0629
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: jeng.terry@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AD75
_______________________________________________________________________
3402. STANDARDS AND PRACTICES FOR CONDUCTING ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 312
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, January 11, 2004, Small Business
Liability Protection Act section 223, CERCLA 101(35)(B)(2)(ii).
Abstract: The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (the ``Brownfields Amendments'') amended a number of
provisions in CERCLA including section 101(35)(B) and includes, among
other things, new provisions regarding CERCLA liability protections for
certain landowners. As part of these provisions, the Brownfields
Amendments require bona fide prospective purchasers, contiguous
property owners, and innocent landowners to conduct ``all appropriate
inquiries'' into prior ownership and use of the property at the time
the party acquires the property. In the Brownfields Amendments,
Congress directed EPA to promulgate regulations establishing standards
and practices for conducting ``all appropriate inquiries.'' Section 101
(35)(B)(iii) of CERCLA, as amended, includes criteria that EPA is
required to address in setting these standards and practices. This
regulation, when finalized, will establish the federal standards for
conducting ``all appropriate inquiries,'' pursuant to the statute.
Recipients of Brownfields Assessment Grants awarded under section
104(k)(2)(B) of CERCLA also will be regulated by the final action.
Purchasers of contaminated properties seeking any of the protections
from CERCLA liability will be required to follow the promulgated
procedures and standards. EPA developed the proposed federal standard
for all appropriate inquiries under a negotiated rulemaking process.
EPA established a FACA Committee charged with negotiating a federal
standard in accordance with the statutory criteria.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4739. State, local and Tribal governments
affected if they are grant recipients.
Agency Contact: Patricia Overmeyer, Environmental Protection Agency,
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 5105T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-2774
Fax: 202-566-2757
Email: overmeyer.patricia@epamail.epa.gov
Helen Keplinger, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 2272A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4221
Fax: 202 229-3954
Email: keplinger.helen@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF04
_______________________________________________________________________
3403. REVISE 40 CFR PART 35 SUBPART O: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS AND
SUPERFUND STATE CONTRACTS FOR SUPERFUND RESPONSE ACTIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 to 9675
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 35 subpart O
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: 40 CFR part 35 subpart O is the Superfund Administrative
Regulation that governs awarding of Superfund cooperative agreements
(CAs) to States, Indian tribes, and territories of the United States.
Subpart O covers State-lead, site-specific cooperative agreements for
non-time-critical removal, preremedial, remedial, and enforcement
actions, and site-specific management assistance for Federal-lead
projects. Also covered by subpart O are non-site-specific Core Program
and Voluntary Cleanup Program State infrastructure development, as well
as Brownfields pilots, and Brownfields assessments. The requirements
for Superfund State contracts, financial administration, property,
procurement, reporting, recordkeeping, and closeout are provided in
subpart O.
Subpart O was promulgated 6/5/1990, and became effective on 7/5/1990.
Many changes in the Superfund program have occurred over the past
almost ten years and these need to be reflected in subpart O. The six
categories of CAs presently used in subpart O need greater flexibility
to accommodate the new types of CAs that have developed. For example,
the number of Block Funding Reform pilots, begun in 1997, to
consolidate several of the cooperative agreements offered in subpart O,
has grown to about 16 for fiscal year 2000, and have generated at least
60 approved deviation requests from subpart O and 40 CFR part 31. These
pilot projects offer considerable administrative relief to States,
tribes, and EPA by reducing reporting requirements,broadening scope
changes without amendment, increasing the ability to move monies within
and among CAs, and relaxing application requirements regarding site-
specific identification of cooperative agreement funds to certain
activities, while maintaining site-specific drawdown requirements
needed for cost recovery and Superfund accounting. Subpart O also needs
to be conformed with part 31 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements).
EPA expects to institutionalizethe combining of CA types, create more
flexible reporting requirements, permit greater scope changes without
amendment, provide more flexible money movement within and among CAs,
and promote other policy advances in State/tribal/EPA interaction.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4177.
[[Page 38299]]
Agency Contact: Kirby Biggs, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204W, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-308-8506
Fax: 703 308-8433
Email: biggs.kirby@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE62
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
_______________________________________________________________________
3404. REPORTABLE QUANTITY ADJUSTMENTS FOR CARBAMATES AND CARBAMATE-
RELATED HAZARDOUS WASTE STREAMS; REPORTABLE QUANTITY ADJUSTMENT FOR
INORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING PROCESS WASTE (K178)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9602(a); 42 USC 11004
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302; 40 CFR 355
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA listed carbamate waste streams and certain inorganic
chemical manufacturing process waste as hazardous wastes under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). RCRA listed wastes, by
statute, automatically become hazardous substances under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) and are assigned a one pound statutory reportable quantity
(RQ) until EPA adjusts them. These substances also become subject to
reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) with a one pound threshold. EPA proposed RQ
adjustments for these carbamates and wastes. Most RQ adjustments are
greater than one pound. Raising the RQs for these substances will
decrease the burden on 1) the regulated community for complying with
the reporting requirements under CERCLA and EPCRA; 2) Federal, State,
and local authorities for program implementation; and 3) Federal,
State, or local authorities, if they release hazardous substances at
the RQ level or greater.
In addition, we've proposed an RQ adjustment for the inorganic chemical
manufacturing process waste (K178)(66 FR 58258, 11/20/01). The Agency
received one comment for the carbamates RQ adjustment and one for the
inorganics RQ adjustment. Neither comment wil delay promulgation of the
final rule.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/04/03 68 FR 67916
Final Action 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 3423.
Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE12
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
_______________________________________________________________________
3405. CRITERIA FOR THE DESIGNATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES UNDER CERCLA
SECTION 102(A)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9602
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302.4
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will address the development of evaluation
criteria for the designation of substances as hazardous under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA). It is necessary to develop evaluation criteria because the
Agency has the authority under CERCLA 102(a) to designate substances as
hazardous; however, the Agency does not have criteria to do so. To date
the only substances designated as CERCLA hazardous substances are as a
result of their appearance on other Acts' lists defined under CERCLA
101(14). Using CERCLA designation criteria the Agency may establish
CERCLA hazardous substances independently from other Acts, in the
interest of public health and the environment.
The purpose of this action is to have well thought-out criteria for
designating hazardous substances that may be applied to individual
substances for evaluation and decision as to whether or not the
substance should be appropriately designated a CERCLA 102(a) hazardous
substance. The Agency already has the authority to designate substances
as hazardous; in this action, criteria will be developed to implement
that authority.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4201.
Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE63
_______________________________________________________________________
3406. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTING EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN AIR RELEASES OF NOX
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9603
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302.6(c)
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 38300]]
Abstract: The Agency is considering proposing to administratively
exempt from reporting requirements the releases of certain NOx
emissions to air. This would eliminate reports from facilities emitting
NOx where the Agency has determined that the releases pose little or no
risk or to which a Federal response is infeasible or inappropriate.
Requiring reports of such releases would serve little or no useful
purpose and could, instead, impose a significant burden on the Federal
response system and on the persons responsible for notifying the
Federal government of the release.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4736.
Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF02
_______________________________________________________________________
3407. CORRECTION OF ERRORS AND ADJUSTMENT OF CERCLA REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 9602-9603
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 302 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Agency is considering proposing corrections and other
changes to 40 CFR 302.4, the Designation of Hazardous Substances. The
proposal may include the correction of entries for individual
substances, entries for F-and K- waste streams and entries in Appendix
A of 40 CFR 302.4. Other aspects of the proposal may include additional
substances as entries in Table 302.4, Appendix A to Section 302.4, and
the table in Section 302.6(b)(iii); removal of other entries from these
lists; and amendments to certain footnotes that explain entries in
Table 302.4.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4737. The Agency is considering additional
corrections not covered in a prior Error Correction Rulemaking (67 FR
45314, 7/9/02) and expected to generate comment from the public.
Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5204G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-9086
Fax: 703 603-9104
Email: beasley.lynn@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AF03
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3408. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR INDIAN COUNTRY WATERS
Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131; 40 CFR 121.17 (New); 40 CFR 122.4 (Amended);
40 CFR 123.1 (Amended); 40 CFR 131.4 (Amended); 40 CFR 131.40 (New); 40
CFR 230.10 (Amended); 40 CFR 233.1 (Amended); 40 CFR 233.51 (Amended)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering preparing an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM) for Federal water quality standards for waters in
Indian country. EPA is currently reviewing detailed comments from
fourteen tribes, two tribal organizations, four States, and two Federal
agencies to the November 2003 staff draft ANPRM. A majority of tribal
commenters indicated a need for more formal consultation with tribes on
the potential rulemaking. EPA is considering how best to undertake
government-to-government consultation with affected tribes before any
rulemaking on Federal water quality standards for waters of Indian country.
Without applicable standards, the Clean Water Act's mechanisms for
protecting water quality in Indian country are limited. A Federal
promulgation would not prevent tribes from developing and adopting
their own federally approved water quality standards where possible.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4344.
Agency Contact: Fred Leutner, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4305, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0378
Fax: 202 566-0409
Email: leutner.fred@epamail.epa.gov
Edward Hanlon, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4305,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0765
Fax: 202 566-0409
Email: hanlon.edward@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD46
[[Page 38301]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3409. REVISIONS TO THE NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION
CONTINGENCY PLAN; SUBPART J PRODUCT SCHEDULE LISTING REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321(d)(2); ``CWA 311(d)(2)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action will propose revisions to subpart J of the
National Contingency Plan (NCP). The Clean Water Act requires EPA to
prepare a schedule of dispersants, other chemicals, and other spill
mitigating devices and substances, if any, that may be used in carrying
out the NCP. Under subpart J, respondents wishing to add a product to
the Product Schedule must submit technical product data to EPA. This
rulemaking will propose revisions to subpart J to clarify and change
protocols for effectivenessand toxicity testing. It will clarify EPA
authority to remove products from the Product Schedule. These changes
will help ensure protection of the environment when these products are
used to clean up and mitigate oil spills (1) into or upon navigable
waters, adjoining shorelines, the waters of the contiguous zone, or (2)
which may affect natural resources belonging to or under the exclusive
management authority of the United States.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4526.
Sectors Affected: 54 Professional, Scientific and Technical Services;
3259 Other Chemical Product Manufacturing; 325 Chemical Manufacturing;
3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing
Agency Contact: William Nichols, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5203G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-9918
Fax: 703 603-9116
Email: nichols.nick@epa.gov
David Evans, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5203G, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 703-603-8885
Fax: 703-603-9116
Email: evans.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2050-AE87
_______________________________________________________________________
3410. UNIFORM NATIONAL DISCHARGE STANDARDS FOR VESSELS OF THE ARMED
FORCES--PHASE II
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1322; 33 USC 1361
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1700
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 10, 2001.
Abstract: This action is Phase II of implementing regulations for
Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces.
In 1996 the Clean Water Act was amended to create section 312(n),
Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces
(UNDS). Section 312(n) directs EPA and DOD to jointly develop a
nationally uniform set of discharge standards for Armed Forces vessels,
preempting existing and future State and local standards for these
discharges. The purpose of the statute is to allow DOD to plan, design,
and build environmentally sound vessels, to encourage the development
and use of innovative pollution control technology, and to improve
operational flexibility. EPA and DOD jointly promulgated Phase I of
these regulations, 40 CFR part 1700, on May 10, 1999 (64 FR 25126). The
Phase I rulemaking concluded that 25 discharges from Armed Forces
vessels would require control because they have the potential to
adversely impact the aquatic environment. Phase II will establish the
performance standards for these 25 discharges. Due to the complicated
task of developing standards for so many complex waste streams
simultaneously, DOD and EPA modified the rulemaking approach to ensure
that the benefits of the UNDS program accrue in a more timely manner.
The modification consists of promulgating the Phase II discharges in
groups or ``batches.'' The first batch, consisting of seven discharges,
would be proposed in January of 2005. Once DOD implements the rules for
achieving the standards set in Phase II, covered discharges from Armed
Forces vessels will be required to meet these standards, and will not
be subject to discharge standards established by States.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/05
Final Action 09/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4357.
Agency Contact: Steven Giordano, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4504T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1272
Fax: 202-566-1546
Email: giordano.steven@epamail.epa.gov
Brian Rappoli, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4504T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-260-9590
Fax: 202-564-1546
Email: rappoli.brian@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD39
_______________________________________________________________________
3411. MINIMIZING ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM COOLING WATER INTAKE
STRUCTURES AT EXISTING FACILITIES UNDER SECTION 316(B) OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT, PHASE 3
Priority: Economically Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 ``CWA 301''; 33 USC 1316 ``CWA 306''; 33
USC 1326 ``CWA 316''; 33 USC 1361 ``CWA 501''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 125
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, November 1, 2004.
Final, Judicial, June 1, 2006.
Abstract: This rulemaking will affect existing facilities that use
cooling water intake structures, and whose intake flow levels exceed a
minimum threshold to be determined by EPA during this rulemaking. The
rule will apply to existing facilities in the
[[Page 38302]]
following industries at a minimum: 1) electricity generating facilities
not covered by Phase 2 regulations; 2) pulp and paper manufacturing
facilities; 3) chemicals and allied products manufacturing facilities;
4) petroleum and coal products manufacturing facilities; and 5) primary
metals manufacturing facilities. EPA will also consider developing
regulations for certain new offshore facilities not included in the
Phase I rule, such as offshore and coastal oil and gas extraction
facilities. Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act provides that any
standard established pursuant to sections 301 or 306 of the Clean Water
Act and applicable to a point source shall require that the location,
design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intakestructures
reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse
environmental impact. A primary purpose of this action is to minimize
the impingement and entrainment of fish and other aquatic organisms by
cooling water intake structures. Impingement occurs when fish and other
aquatic life are traped against cooling water intake structures.
Entrainment occurs when aquatic organisms, eggs and larvae are drawn
into a cooling system and then pumped back out, resulting in
significant injury or mortality to the entrained organisms.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/04
Final Action 06/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4543. Split from RIN 2040-AC34.
Sectors Affected: 312 Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing; 325
Chemical Manufacturing; 61131 Colleges, Universities and Professional
Schools; 334 Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing; 211111
Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction; 22111 Electric Power
Generation; 335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance and Component
Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing; 311 Food
Manufacturing; 333 Machinery Manufacturing; 21 Mining; 211112 Natural
Gas Liquid Extraction; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing;
322 Paper Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing;
326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 331 Primary Metal
Manufacturing; 22133 Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply; 313 Textile
Mills; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 321 Wood Product
Manufacturing
Agency Contact: Paul Shriner, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1076
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: shriner.paul@epamail.epa.gov
Martha Segall, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1041
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: segall.martha@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD70
_______________________________________________________________________
3412. NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR MUNICIPAL SANITARY AND COMBINED
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEMS, MUNICIPAL SATELLITE COLLECTION SYSTEMS,
SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS, AND PEAK EXCESS FLOW TREATMENT FACILITIES
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311``CWA 301''; 33 USC 1314``CWA 304''; 33 USC
1318``CWA 308''; 33 USC 1342``CWA 402''; 33 USC 1361``CWA 501(a)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.38; 40 CFR 122.41; 40 CFR 122.42
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is considering whether to develop a notice of rulemaking
outlining a broad-based regulatory framework for sanitary sewer
collection systems under the NPDES program. The Agency is considering
proposing standard permit conditions for inclusion in permits for
publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) and municipal sanitary sewer
collection systems. The standard requirements would address reporting,
public notification, and recordkeeping requirements for sanitary sewer
overflows (SSOs), capacityassurance, management, operation and
maintenance requirements for municipal sanitary sewer collection
systems, and a prohibition on SSOs. The Agency is also considering
proposing a regulatory framework for applying NPDES permit conditions,
including applicable standard permit conditions, to municipal satellite
collection systems. Municipal satellite collection systems are sanitary
sewers owned or operated by a municipality that conveys wastewater to a
POTW operated by a different municipality.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/00/05
Final Action 04/00/07
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN 3999. Note: This rule was formerly known as
``Revisions to NPDES Requirements for Compliance Reporting and
Collection System Discharges.''
Sectors Affected: 22132 Sewage Treatment Facilities
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/npdes
Agency Contact: Kevin Weiss, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4203M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-0742
Fax: 202 564-6392
Email: weiss.kevin@epamail.epa.gov
Kevin DeBell, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4203M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-0040
Fax: 202 564-6392
Email: debell.kevin@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD02
_______________________________________________________________________
3413. POLICY REGARDING NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT DURING WET
WEATHER CONDITIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.41(m)
Legal Deadline: None
[[Page 38303]]
Abstract: During periods of wet weather, wastewater flows received by
municipal sewage treatment plants can significantly increase, which can
create operational challenges for sewage treatment facilities. Where
peak flows approach or exceed the design capacity of a treatment plant
they can seriously reduce treatment efficiency or damage treatment
units. In addition to hydraulic concerns, wastewater associated with
peak flows may have low organic strength, which can also decrease
treatment efficiencies. One engineering practice that some facilities
use to protect biological treatment units from damage and to prevent
overflows and backups elsewhere in the system is referred to as wet
weather blending. Wet weather blending occurs during peak wet weather
flow events when flows that exceed the capacity of the biological units
are routed around the biological units and blended with effluent from
the biological units prior to discharge. Regulatory agencies, sewage
treatment plant operators, and representatives of environmental
advocacy groups have expressed uncertainty about National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements addressing such
situations. EPA requested public comment on a proposed policy published
on November 7, 2003. EPA's intention is to develop a policy that will
provide criteria for authorizing or approving blended discharges that
meet permit limitations in NPDES permits. When implemented, EPA intends
that the policy will ensure that NPDES requirements be applied in a
nationally-consistent manner that improves the capacity, management,
operation and maintenance of sewage treatment plants and collection
systems and protects human health and the environment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Draft Policy 11/07/03 68 FR 63042
Final Policy 08/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4690.
Sectors Affected: 22132 Sewage Treatment Facilities
URL For More Information:
www.epa.gov/npdes
Agency Contact: Kevin Debell, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4203M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-0040
Fax: 202 564-6392
Email: debell.kevin@epa.gov
Patrick Bradley, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4203M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-0729
Fax: 202 564-6392
Email: bradley.patrick@pa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD87
_______________________________________________________________________
3414. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PATHOGENS AND
PATHOGEN INDICATORS FOR COASTAL RECREATION WATERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1313
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131D
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The October 2000 Beaches Environmental and Coastal Health Act
(BEACH Act) amended the Clean Water Act to require coastal and Great
Lake States to adopt criteria: ``as protective of human health as''
EPA's criteria for pathogen and pathogen indicators for their coastal
recreation waters by April 2004. The BEACH Act defines ``coastal
recreation waters'' as marine coastal waters that are designated under
section 303 (c) of the Clean Water Act by a State for swimming,
bathing, surfing or similar water contact activities and the Great
Lakes. The Act further requires EPA to promptly propose new or revised
water quality criteria for coastal or Great Lake States that do not
adopt criteria for pathogens or pathogen indicators ``as protective of
human health as'' EPA's criteria.
This action announces the Agency's intent to set revised or new water
quality standards for pathogens and pathogen indicators for states
(with coastal recreation waters) that fail to adopt water quality
criteria and standards for pathogens for which EPA has developed
criteria. This action announces the Agency's intent to set revised or
new water quality standards for pathogens and pathogen indicators for
states (with coastal recreation waters) that fail to adopt water
quality criteria and standards for pathogen indicators as protective of
human health as EPA's 1986 bacteria criteria.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/00/04
Final Action 09/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4852.
Agency Contact: Richard Healy, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4305T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-0405
Fax: 202 566-0409
Email: healy.richard@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AE63
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3415. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRY
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 ``CWA 301''; 33 USC 1314 ``CWA 304''; 33
USC 1316 ``CWA 306''; 33 USC 1318 ``CWA 308''; 33 USC 1342 ``CWA 402'';
33 USC 1361 ``CWA 501''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 450; 40 CFR 122
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, May 15, 2002, -.
Final, Judicial, March 31, 2004, -.
Abstract: In June, 2002, EPA proposed three options that relate to the
discharge of pollutants from construction sites. The proposal included
two options that work in conjunction with existing storm water
regulations to continue support for state and local flexibility and
land use
[[Page 38304]]
decision-making. The proposal also included an option to rely solely on
existing regulations and not establish additional regulatory
requirements through effluent guidelines. The comment period closed in
December, 2002. Final action is subject to a court-ordered deadline of
3/31/2004.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/24/02 67 FR 42644
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4280. For more information on the
construction and development rule visit web site.
Sectors Affected: 233 Building, Developing and General Contracting; 234
Heavy Construction
Agency Contact: Jesse Pritts, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1038
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: pritts.jesse@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD42
_______________________________________________________________________
3416. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE CONCENTRATED AQUATIC
ANIMAL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: ``CWA Section 301''; ``CWA Section 304''; ``CWA
Section 306''; ``CWA Section 307''; ``CWA Section 308''; ``CWA Section
318''; ``CWA Section 402''; ``CWA Section 501''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 451
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, August 14, 2002.
Final, Judicial, June 30, 2004.
Abstract: Currently, there are no federal technology-based standards
for aquatic animal production facilities, which are part of the
aquaculture industry. This action is a new effort to develop pollutant
controls in the form of nationally applicable discharge standards for
commercial and public aquaculture operations. In assessments of surface
water quality, States most frequently cite siltation, nutrients, and
pathogens as the major cause of water quality impairment. With the
growth of the aquaculture industry, and inconsistent state of
regulatory oversight, EPA will examine available technologies for the
control of solids which in turn control other pollutants, primarily
nutrients. This action was formerly titled Aquaculture.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/12/02 67 FR 57871
Notice of Data Availability 12/29/03 68 FR 75068
Final Action 06/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4406.
Sectors Affected: 112511 Finfish Farming and Fish Hatcheries; 112519
Other Animal Aquaculture; 112512 Shellfish Farming; 71213 Zoos and
Botanical Gardens
Agency Contact: Marta Jordan, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1049
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: jordan.marta@epamail.epa.gov
Marvin Rubin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1050
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: rubin.marvin@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD55
_______________________________________________________________________
3417. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE MEAT AND POULTRY
PRODUCTS POINT SOURCE CATEGORY (REVISIONS)
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1317; 33
USC 1318; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 432 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, January 30, 2002, -.
Final, Judicial, February 26, 2004, -.
Abstract: The Agency proposed revisions to the effluent limitations
guidelines and standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point Source
Category in February 2002. The current regulations, at 40 CFR 432, are
more than 20 years old and establish limitations and standards for only
conventional pollutants. The current regulations do not establish
national regulations for ammonia nitrogen discharges associated with
slaughterhouses/packinghouses (Subparts A-D). Nutrients like ammonia
may pose a water quality problem for impaired streams. Revisions to the
current regulations may also include effluent limitations for poultry
processing, which is not currently covered by any effluent guideline.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/25/02 67 FR 8582
NODA 08/13/03 68 FR 48471
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4407.
Sectors Affected: 311611 Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering; 311612
Meat Processed from Carcasses; 311613 Rendering and Meat By-product
Processing; 311615 Poultry Processing
Agency Contact: Samantha Lewis, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1058
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: lewis.samantha@epamail.epa.gov
Marvin Rubin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1050
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: rubin.marvin@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD56
_______________________________________________________________________
3418. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES PROGRAM PLAN FOR 2004/2005
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33USC 1314; 33 USC 1316
CFR Citation: None
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, February 4, 2004, Final Plan.
Abstract: EPA publishes an Effluent Guidelines Program Plan every other
year as required by Section 304(m) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The
Plan sets forth EPA's rationale for the selection of particular
industries as
[[Page 38305]]
candidates for new or revised effluent guidelines. EPA's Effluent
Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/2005 will describe the effluent
guidelines program and the effluent guidelines underway, as well as
identify existing guidelines that may be revised or new guidelines that
may be developed. OW will use the 2004/2005 Plan as a strategic
opportunity to help design the future of the technology-based pollution
control program for industrial sources of water pollution.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Draft Plan 12/31/03 68 FR 75515
Final Action 04/26/04 69 FR 22472
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4766.
URL For More Information:
http://www.epa.gov/guide/plan.html
URL For Public Comments:
http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ow-2002-0020
Agency Contact: Carey Johnston, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1014
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: johnston.carey@epamail.epa.gov
Tom Wall, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202-566-1060
Fax: 202 566-1054
Email: wall.tom@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD92
_______________________________________________________________________
3419. TEST PROCEDURES: REVISIONS TO METHOD DETECTION AND QUANTITATION
FOR THE CLEAN WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1361(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, February 28, 2003, Settlement
Agreement.
Final, Judicial, November 1, 2004, Settlement Agreement.
Abstract: EPA is to take final action on a reassessment of the Agency's
procedures for determining the sensitivity of analytic test methods for
aqueous samples. EPA may also amend the Guidelines Establishing Test
Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40 CFR part 136 related
to the detection and quantification procedures currently used by EPA
for analytes regulated in the wastewater program as authorized under
the Clean Water Act (CWA). The current method detection limit (MDL)
procedure is set forth at 40 CFR part 136, appendix B. EPA has not
promulgated a generic procedure for quantification but it uses the
minimum level of quantitation (ML) in its wastewater program. The ML is
defined in analytical methods and is generally set at 3.18 times the
MDL. The Office of Water has been working to revise and refine these
concepts to facilitate regulation of pollutants at low levels (often
levels that are lower than measurement capabilities will allow) and to
address other potential approaches to detection and quantification,
including concepts being introduced by outside organizations such as
voluntary consensus standards bodies (VCSBs). The rulemaking would also
re-evaluate the current MDL and quantification approaches and assess
alternative approaches.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/12/03 68 FR 11791
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4378.
Agency Contact: Richard Reding, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4656
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: reding.richard@epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1005
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD53
_______________________________________________________________________
3420. TEST PROCEDURES: NEW AND UPDATED TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS
OF POLLUTANTS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT AND SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1361(a); 42 USC 300f; 42 USC 300g-
1; 42 USC 300j-4; 42 USC 300j-9(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 141
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would amend the ``Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants'' under 40
CFR Part 136 and the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations under
40 CFR part 141 to approve new and updated EPA methods for wastewater,
ambient water quality, and drinking water, including new and updated
versions of methods from voluntary consensus standards bodies and other
organizations. These methods are used to comply with monitoring
requirements in the wastewater,ambient water quality and/or drinking
water programs, as authorized under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Safe
Drinking Water Act. This regulation would propose new methods for
metals such as Method 200.8 (which utilizes ICP/MS), new methods for
chemical pollutants (e.g., Method 245.7), updated methods for chemical
pollutants (e.g., Methods 300.1 and 200.7), including methods from
voluntary consensus standards bodies (VCSBs), and from other external
organizations submitted under EPA's alternate test procedure program.
The new and updated methods include methods from organizations such as
the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard
Methods, and the Association of Official Analytical Methods-International.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/06/04 69 CFR 18166
Final Action 04/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4540. This action incorporates the
following analytical methods that had previously been tracked
independently: 1. RIN
[[Page 38306]]
2040-AC95, SAN 3155 - Test Procedures for the Analysis of Miscellaneous
Metals, Anions, and Volatile Organics Under the Clean Water Act, Phase
One 2. RIN 2040-AD12, SAN 4089 - Test Procedures for the Analysis of
Miscellaneous Metals, Anions, and Volatile Organics Under the Clean
Water Act, Phase Two, and 3. RIN 2040-AD52, SAN 4377 - Test Procedures
for the Analysis of Mercury Under the Clean Water Act (Method 245.7).
Agency Contact: William Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1061
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: telliard.william@epamail.epa.gov
Marion Kelly, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1045
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: kelly.marion@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD71
_______________________________________________________________________
3421. MINIMIZING ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM COOLING WATER INTAKE
STRUCTURES AT EXISTING FACILITIES UNDER SECTION 316(B) OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT, PHASE 2
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 ``CWA 301''; 33 USC 1316 ``CWA 306''; 33
USC 1326 ``CWA 316''; 33 USC 1361 ``CWA 501''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 125
Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, February 28, 2002, -.
Final, Judicial, February 16, 2004, -.
Abstract: This rulemaking affects large existing electricity generating
facilities that employ cooling water intake structures. Section 316(b)
of the Clean Water Act provides that any standard established pursuant
to sections 301 or 306 of the Clean Water Act and applicable to a point
source shall require that the location, design, construction, and
capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology
available for minimizing adverse environmental impact. A primary
purpose of the rulemaking is to minimize any adverse environmental
impact that may be associated with the impingement and entrainment of
fish and other aquatic organisms by cooling water intake structures.
Impingement refers to trapping fish and other aquatic life on intake
screens or similar devices where they may be injured or killed.
Entrainment occurs when smaller aquatic organisms, eggs, and larvae are
drawn into a cooling system, and then pumped back out, often with
significant injury or mortality due to heat, physical stress or
exposure to chemicals.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/09/02 67 FR 17122
NODA 03/19/03 68 FR 13522
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4474. Split from RIN 2040-AC34.
Sectors Affected: 2211 Electric Power Generation, Transmission and
Distribution
Agency Contact: Debbi Hart, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-6379
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: hart.debbi@epamail.epa.gov
Martha Segall, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1041
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: segall.martha@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD62
_______________________________________________________________________
3422. STREAMLINING THE GENERAL PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS FOR EXISTING AND
NEW SOURCES OF POLLUTION
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314 ``CWA 304''; 33 USC 1317 ``CWA 307''; 33
USC 1342 ``CWA 402''; 33 USC 1361 ``CWA 501''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 403
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The final rule will be promulgated as a program streamlining
activity. The rule will revise certain provisions in the General
Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403) that address restrictions on
and oversight of industrial discharges into Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTWs). The final rule would include exclusions or variable
requirements for smaller facilities that contribute insignificant
amounts of pollutants, clarify requirements for implementing
Pretreatment Standards, and provide more flexible reporting, inspection
and sampling requirements. The revisions should provide greater
flexibility, reduce burden, and achieve improved environmental results
at less cost for regulatory authorities and the regulated community.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/22/99 64 FR 39564
Final Action 11/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3663.
Agency Contact: Greg Schaner, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4203M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-0721
Fax: 202 564-6431
Email: schaner.greg@epamail.epa.gov
Jan Pickrel, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4203M, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7904
Fax: 202 564-6431
Email: pickrel.jan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC58
_______________________________________________________________________
3423. COMPARISON OF DREDGED MATERIAL TO REFERENCE SEDIMENT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1344 ``CWA 404''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 230
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action would revise the testing provisions of the Clean
Water Act section 404(b)(1) Guidelines to provide for comparisons
between dredged material proposed for discharge and reference sediment.
[[Page 38307]]
Reference sediment would be defined as sediment that reflects
conditions at the disposal site had no dredged material disposal ever
occurred there. Because the disposal site itself is currently used as
the point of comparison, this action would make a technical improvement
in assessing cumulative impacts and help make dredged material testing
under section 404 more consistent with that conducted for ocean
disposal, which currently employs a reference sediment approach. This
action is not expected to have a significant impact on state, local, or
tribal governments or small business, as the action will be limited to
Corps projects and permit applications for which dredged material
testing is necessary, and because the effect of the action will be
limited to changing the location of an otherwise collected sample.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/04/95 60 FR 419
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal
Additional Information: SAN 3288.
Agency Contact: John Goodin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4502T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1373
Fax: 202 566-1375
Email: goodin.john@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC14
_______________________________________________________________________
3424. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS: RECODIFICATION OF VARIOUS
EFFLUENT GUIDELINES
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Clean Water Act 301; Clean Water Act 304; Clean Water
Act 306; Clean Water Act 307; Clean Water Act 308; Clean Water Act 402;
Clean Water Act 501
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 401 to 419
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Several years ago, OW conducted a comprehensive review of
effluent guidelines and removed from the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) provisions contained in a number of regulations that were
obsolete or redundant (FR 60 33926, June 29, 1995). In addition to
removing these provisions, EPA's Office of Water identified additional
opportunities for further streamlining some of the effluent guidelines.
This action would recodify the effluent limitations and standards for
12 point source categories without making any legally substantive
changes in the requirements. The revised and shorter format will enable
Federal, State and local regulators and the regulated community to more
easily read, understand and implement the regulations. By reducing the
number of pages in title 40, the new format will also afford
significant long-term savings in the annual cost of printing these
regulations.
The point source categories which would be recodified by this action
include: Dairy Products Processing (part 405), Grain Mills
Manufacturing (part 406), Fruits and Vegetable Processing (part 407),
Canned and Preserved Seafood (part 408), Sugar Processing (part 409),
Textile Mills (part 410), Cement Manufacturing (part 411),
Electroplating (part 413), Inorganic Chemicals (part 415), Soaps and
Detergent Manufacturing (part 417), Fertilizer Manufacturing (part
418), and Petroleum Refining (part 419). The revisions would also
expand the list of general definitions in section 401.11.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4822.
Agency Contact: Hugh Wise, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1031
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: wise.hugh@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AE61
_______________________________________________________________________
3425. UNIFORM NATIONAL DISCHARGE STANDARDS FOR ARMED
FORCES VESSELS--PHASE II
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1322(n) ``CWA sec 312(n) ''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1700 ``(New)''
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action is Phase II of implementing regulations for
Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces.
In 1996, the Clean Water Act was amended to create section 312(n),
Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces
(UNDS). Section 312(n) directs EPA and DOD to jointly develop a
nationally uniform set of discharge standards for Armed Forces vessels,
preempting existing and future State and local standards for these
discharges. The purpose of the statute is to allow DOD to plan, design,
and build environmentally sound vessels, to encourage the development
and use of innovative pollution control technology, and to improve
operational flexibility. EPA and DOD jointly promulgated Phase I of
these regulations, 40 CFR part 1700, on May 10, 1999 (64 FR 25126). The
Phase I rulemaking concluded that 25 discharges from Armed Forces
vessels would require control because they have the potential to
adversely impact the aquatic environment. Phase II will establish the
performance standards for these 25 discharges. Due to the complicated
task of developing standards for so many complex waste streams
simultaneously, DOD and EPA modified the rulemaking approach to ensure
that the benefits of the UNDS program accrue in a more timely manner.
The modification consists of promulgating the Phase II discharges in
groups or ``batches.'' The first batch, consisting of seven discharges,
would be proposed in January of 2005. Once DOD implements rules for
achieving the standards set in Phase II, covered discharges from Armed
Forces vessels will be required to meet these standards, and will not
be subject to discharge standards established by States.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM (Phase II Batch one) 01/00/05
Final Action (Phase II Batch
one) 09/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
[[Page 38308]]
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN 3925.1. Split from RIN 2040-AC96.
URL For More Information:
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/rules/unds
Agency Contact: Steven Giordano, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4504T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1272
Fax: 202-566-1546
Email: giordano.steven@epamail.epa.gov
Brian Rappoli, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4504T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-260-9590
Fax: 202-564-1546
Email: rappoli.brian@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AE64
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3426. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE PULP, PAPER, AND
PAPERBOARD POINT SOURCE CATEGORY, DISSOLVING KRAFT AND DISSOLVING
SULFITE SUBCATEGORIES (PHASE III)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1317; 33
USC 1318; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 430.10 to 430.18; 40 CFR 430.40 to 430.48
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On December 17, 1993, EPA proposed revised effluent
limitations, guidelines and standards, and best management practices
regulations for the Dissolving Kraft and Dissolving Sulfite
Subcategories of the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source Category
(40 CFR part 430). EPA refers to this rulemaking as Pulp and Paper
Phase III. EPA is considering the public comments on the proposed rule
and the new data acquired since proposal. EPA will consider as part of
its 2004 effluent guidelines planning process under CWA section 304 (m)
whether to proceed with the rulemaking.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/17/93 58 FR 66078
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4370.
Sectors Affected: 3221 Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills
Agency Contact: Donald Anderson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1021
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: anderson.donaldf@epa.gov
Ahmar Siddiqui, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1044
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: siddiqui.ahmar@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD49
_______________________________________________________________________
3427. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF TRACE METALS UNDER THE CLEAN
WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314 ``CWA 304''; 33 USC 1361(a) ``CWA 501
(a)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR part 136 to approve new EPA methods for the determination of trace
metals at EPA's water quality criteria levels. These methods are
necessary for the implementation of water quality-based permits under
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) of the
Clean Water Act. Water quality-based permits are necessary when
technology-based controls do notensure that a particular water body
would meet the State's designated water quality standard. Because the
methods currently approved under 40 CFR part 136 were designed to
support primarily technology-based permitting needs, and because these
technology-based levels are as much as 280 times higher than water
quality-based criteria for metals. EPA is pursuing approval of new test
procedures.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3702.
Agency Contact: William Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1061
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: telliard.william@epamail.epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1005
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC75
_______________________________________________________________________
3428. TEST PROCEDURES: INCREASED METHOD FLEXIBILITY FOR TEST PROCEDURES
APPROVED FOR CLEAN WATER ACT COMPLIANCE MONITORING
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314 ``CWA 304''; 33 USC 1361(a) ``CWA 501
(a)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would highlight the flexibility
already contained in the 600 and 1600 series of EPA Methods that are
currently approved for Clean Water Act compliance monitoring under 40
CFR part 136, Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis
of
[[Page 38309]]
Pollutants. These methods typically contain a statement that, in
recognition of advances that are occurring in analytical technology,
and to allow the analyst to overcome sample matrix interferences, the
analyst is permitted certain options to improve separations or lower
the costs of measurements. These options include alternate extraction,
concentration, cleanup procedures, and changes in columns and
detectors. The methods further require the analyst to demonstrate that
the method modifications will not adversely affect the quality of data
by generating quality control results that meet the specifications
contained in the method. Despite this stated flexibility, the Agency
has found that many NPDES and pretreatment permitting authorities are
not aware of this flexibility when issuing or enforcing NPDES and
pretreatment permits. Therefore, this regulatory action will highlight
the existing method flexibility and clarify EPA's position regarding
its application. This action will also extend this flexibility to other
methods currently approved under 40 CFR part 136. The purpose of
extending this flexibility to other methods is to (1) increase
consistency between methods, (2) provide for increased recognition of
advances in analytical technology, and (3) reduce costs associated with
analytical measurements.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3714.
Agency Contact: William Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1061
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: telliard.william@epamail.epa.gov
Marion Kelly, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1045
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: kelly.marion@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC92
_______________________________________________________________________
3429. TEST PROCEDURES: PERFORMANCE-BASED MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (PBMS)
PROCEDURES AND GUIDANCE FOR CLEAN WATER ACT TEST PROCEDURES
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314 ``CWA 304''; 33 USC 1361(a) ``CWA 501(a)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would establish the use of
performance-based measurement procedures and guidance for use in Clean
Water Act compliance monitoring under 40 CFR part 136, Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants. The new
procedures would include guidance concerning the format, content,
quality assurance/quality control, and data validation requirements for
use of test methods. This regulatory action would also describe
increased program guidance in the form ofa clearinghouse, technical
bulletins, and/or guidance documents geared towards clarifying
technical and policy issues associated with the use of test methods
approved for use in the program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/28/97 62 FR 14975
Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3713.
Agency Contact: William Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1061
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: telliard.william@epamail.epa.gov
Marion Kelly, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1045
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: kelly.marion@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC93
_______________________________________________________________________
3430. TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CO-PLANAR AND MONO-ORTHO-
SUBSTITUTED POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1361(a)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 503
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulatory action would propose to amend the Guidelines
Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants under 40
CFR parts 136 and 503 to approve EPA Method 1668 for the congener-
specific determination of co-planar and mono-ortho-substituted
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in effluent, ambient water, and
sludge. This method is necessary for the implementation of water
quality-based permits under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) of the Clean Water Act. Water quality-based
permits are necessary when technology-based controls do not ensure that
a particular water body would meet the State's designated water quality
standard. At present there is no EPA analytical method for
determination of these PCBs at the levels of concern.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4049.
Agency Contact: William Telliard, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4303T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1061
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: telliard.william@epamail.epa.gov
Maria Gomez-Taylor, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1005
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: gomez-taylor.maria@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD09
[[Page 38310]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3431. NPDES STREAMLINING RULE -- ROUND III
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 ``CWA 301''; 33 USC 1312 ``CWA 302''; 33
USC 1314 ``CWA 304''; 33 USC 1316 ``CWA 306''; 33 USC 1318 ``CWA 308'';
33 USC 1342 ``CWA 402''; 33 USC 1361 ``CWA 501''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA plans to issue a rulemaking package to revise NPDES
requirements in parts 122, 123, and 124 to eliminate redundant
regulations, provide clarification, and remove or streamline
unnecessary procedures. Revisions under consideration in this rule
include adding additional permit modifications that can be considered
minor modifications at 122.63, and changes to requirements concerning
EPA's review of State permits. Other revisions may be considered as
work on this rule progresses. This rulemaking is expected to affect
entities which implement the NPDES program or are regulated by it. This
includes small businesses and State, tribal and local governments. Most
of these effects are expected to be deregulatory or streamlining in nature.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/06
Final Action 08/00/07
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 3786.
Agency Contact: HowardE Rubin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4203M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-2051
Fax: 202 564-9544
Email: rubin.howarde@epamail.epa.gov
Robert Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4203M, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-9536
Fax: 202 564-9544
Email: wood.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC84
_______________________________________________________________________
3432. WATERSHED RULE: TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) PROGRAM REVISIONS
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1313; 33 USC 1329; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1256
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 124; 40 CFR 130
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This action amends regulations governing the TMDL program to
ensure that it is effective allowing for active participation by all
stakeholders including local governments and communities. The
amendments will address: the scope and content of the list of impaired
waters required by section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, the scope and
content of TMDLs, EPA's role in helping States establish 303(d) lists
and TMDLs so that impaired waters are restored, and the framework for
implementing TMDLs provided by State CPPs and watershed plans. EPA is
also proposing revision to the NPDES permitting regulations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4623.
Agency Contact: Christine Ruf, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4503T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1220
Fax: 202-260-2300
Email: ruf.christine@epamail.epa.gov
Francoise Brasier, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4503T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1214
Fax: 202 566-1333
Email: brasier.francoise@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD82
_______________________________________________________________________
3433. CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND REGULATION REVISIONS RE: USE AS
MATCHING FUNDS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 33 USC 1383(h)
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 35.3125(b)(1)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This regulation would revise the Clean Water State Revolving
Fund (CWSRF) Regulations to allow the use of loans from the non-Federal
and non-State match share of CWSRF funds as a match for infrastructure
grants. In 1990, EPA issued regulations implementing the CWSRF program,
established as Title VI of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in 1987. Section
603(h) of the CWA prohibits use of the CWSRF loan as matching funds
with respect to the non-Federal share of the cost of a treatment works
project for which a municipality or agency is receiving assistance from
the Administrator under any other authority. From FY 1995 onward,
Congress has authorized and appropriated funds for infrastructure
construction grants in various Appropriations Acts. There are currently
projects totaling over $4 billion dollars. EPA has been asked to allow
CWSRF funds to be used as a match for these grants; but 40 CFR
35.3125(b)(1) prohibits such action. The prohibition on the use of
CWSRF as a match for a Title II construction grant would continue.
[[Page 38311]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Action To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4493.
Agency Contact: Gary Hudiburgh, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
EN-336, 4204M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-0626
Email: hudiburgh.gary@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD68
_______________________________________________________________________
3434. REGULATIONS FOR GRAY AND BLACK WATER DISCHARGES FROM CRUISE SHIPS
OPERATING IN CERTAIN ALASKAN WATERS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: PL 106-554, sec 1404-1407
CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Title XIV: Certain Alaska Cruise Ship Operations (HR 4577)
authorizes EPA to establish effluent standards for black and gray water
from cruise ships into the waters of Alaska, the Alexander Archipelago,
and the Kachemak Bay National Marine Estuarine Research Reserve. EPA
will develop those standards based on the best available scientific
information on the environmental effects of the regulated discharges
and the availability of new technologies for wastewater treatment. The
implementation of these regulations will reduce the environmental
impacts of cruise ships operating in the waters of Alaska, the
Alexander Archipelago, and the Kachemak Bay National Marine Estuarine
Research Reserve.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/06
Final Action 06/00/08
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4746. This rule was formerly known as
``Regulations for Cruise Ships Operating in Alaskan Waters''
Sectors Affected: 483114 Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger
Transportation; 483112 Deep Sea Passenger Transportation
Agency Contact: Elizabeth Kim, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4504T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1270
Fax: 202 566-1546
Email: kim.elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov
David Redford, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4504T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1264
Fax: 202 566-1546
Email: redford.david@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD89
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Clean Water Act (CWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3435. EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR THE CENTRALIZED WASTE
TREATMENT POINT SOURCE CATEGORY (REVISION)
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 437
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 12/22/03 68 FR 71014
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
Agency Contact: Elwood Forsht
Phone: 202-566-1025
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: forsht.elwood@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD95
_______________________________________________________________________
3436. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR ALABAMA--PHASE II
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Withdrawn 05/01/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Agency Contact: Fritz Wagner
Phone: 404 562-9267
Email: wagner.fritz@epa.gov
Jim Keating
Phone: 202-566-0383
Fax: 202 566-0409
Email: keating.jim@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD35
_______________________________________________________________________
3437. ROUND 2 STANDARDS FOR THE USE OR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
Priority: Other Significant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 503 (Revisions)
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 10/24/03 68 FR 61083
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: Alan Rubin
Phone: 202-566-1125
Fax: 202-566-1139
Email: rubin.alan@epamail.epa.gov
Robert Cantilli
Phone: 202-566-1091
Fax: 202 566-1140
Email: cantilli.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC25
[[Page 38312]]
_______________________________________________________________________
3438. MODIFICATION TO COMPETITIVE PROCESS USED BY EPA FOR WETLAND
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT GRANTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 35.613; 40 CFR 35.382
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 02/10/04 69 FR 6284
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State
Agency Contact: Connie Cahanap
Phone: 202 566-1382
Fax: 202 566-1349
Email: cahanap.concepcion@epa.gov
Donna An
Phone: 202-566-1384
Fax: 202 566-1349
Email: an.donna@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD83
_______________________________________________________________________
3439. SEWAGE SLUDGE ROUND I (COMPLETION OF A SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: Section 405(d)``and (e) of the Clean Water Act''; 33
USC 1345(d)``and (e) as amended''; 5 USC 610
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 503
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: On February 19, 1993 (58 FR 9248), EPA promulgated Standards
for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge for the three major sewage
sludge management practices of land application, surface disposal, and
incineration. The Part 503 Standards impose sewage sludge quality
requirements on sewage sludge preparers and management practices on
land appliers of sewage sludge. The Standards also have monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. Small entities are subject
to these standards. Small entities are defined as wastewater treatment
plants that treat domestic sewage with wastewater flow capacities of
less than one million gallons per day (MGD), septage pumpers and
haulers, and sewage sludge preparers and treaters that process and
subsequently use/dispose of less than 290 dry metric tons of sewage
sludge per year. On August 4, 1999 (64 FR 42551) the Part 503 standards
were amended. One of the amendments allowed the permitting authority,
at their discretion, to reduce the frequency of monitoring requirements
for all wastewater treatment plants including small entities. EPA
performed a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis when the Standards were
promulgated in 1993 which indicated that the Rule could have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA then
used this analysis to develop the rule in a way that mitigated small
entity impact to the extent possible while still fulfilling the Clean
Water Act's Section 405(d) mandate to protect public health and the
environment with an adequate margin of safety. EPA initiated a review
of the rule under Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act to
determine if the rule should be continued without change, or should be
amended or rescinded, to minimize adverse economic impacts on small
entities. EPA would have considered, and solicited comments, on the
following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) The nature
of complaints or comments received concerning the rule; (3) The
complexity of the rule; (4) The extent to which the rule overlaps,
duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government
rules; and (5) The degree to which technology, economic conditions, or
other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. Comments
should be submitted to the Agency Contact listed below. Comments must
be received 90 days after this Federal Register notice. This action is
not a rulemaking--it is a review of an existing rulemaking. Any new
rulemaking activity resultingfrom this review will be noticed in future
Regulatory Agendas.
In submitting comments, please reference Docket ID number OW-2003-0016,
and follow the instructions provided in Unit G. of the preamble to the
Spring Regulatory Agenda.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 1 02/19/93 58 FR 9248
Begin Review 05/01/03
End Review 05/20/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4792.
Agency Contact: Alan Rubin, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4304T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1125
Fax: 202-566-1139
Email: rubin.alan@epamail.epa.gov
Robert Cantilli, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, EN-336, 4304T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1091
Fax: 202 566-1140
Email: cantilli.robert@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD96
_______________________________________________________________________
3440. SLUDGE: AGENCY RESPONSE TO THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL REPORT ON
BIOSOLIDS APPLIED TO LAND AND THE RESULTS OF EPA'S REVIEW OF EXISTING
SEWAGE SLUDGE REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 503
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Strategy 12/31/03 68 FR 75531
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Agency Contact: Robert Cantilli
Phone: 202-566-1091
Fax: 202 566-1140
Email: cantilli.robert@epamail.epa.gov
Alan Rubin
Phone: 202-566-1125
Fax: 202-566-1139
Email: rubin.alan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AE59
[[Page 38313]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3441. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: ALDICARB
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA promulgated MCLs for aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, and
aldicarb sulfone in the Phase II rulemaking in 1991 at levels of 0.003,
0.004, and 0.002 ug/l, respectively. In response to an administrative
petition from the manufacturer Rhone-Poulenc, the Agency issued an
administrative stay of the effective date. EPA will reexamine risk
assessment and occurrence data on aldicarb and make a determination of
what further action is appropriate.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 3238.
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Dan Olson, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5239
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: olson.daniel@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AC13
_______________________________________________________________________
3442. UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING REGULATION FOR PUBLIC WATER
SYSTEMS REVISIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141.40
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, August 6, 2004, This statute (SDWA)
requires EPA to publish a list. SDWA does not require a regulation.
Abstract: The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act require
the Agency to publish, every 5 years, a revised listing of the
contaminants to be monitored under the UCMR. The purpose of this
proposed action is to meet that requirement by revising the National
Primary Drinking Water Regulations for the UCMR by making minor
modifications to the current UCMR program to improve its
implementation, to revise the lists of analytes to permit a second
round of monitoring;,and to approve the analytical methods needed to
perform this monitoring.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/00/04
Final Action 09/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 4770.
Agency Contact: Dave Munch, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, MS
140, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 513-569-7843
Fax: 513 569-7191
Email: munch.dave@epamail.epa.gov
Dan Hautman, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, MS 140,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 513-569-7274
Fax: 513 569-7191
Email: hautman.dan@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD93
_______________________________________________________________________
3443. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR
URANIUM
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: Safe Drinking Water Act, sec. 1412; 42 U.S.C 300f; 42
U.S.C. 300g-1; 42 U.S.C. 300j-4; 42 U.S.C. 300j-9
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141.25
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA plans to promulgate a method for compliance monitoring of
uranium that uses an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-
MS) technology. This technology has gained wide acceptance over the
past decade, and should reduce costs for analyzing for uranium and
provide a greater level of accuracy. States, laboratories and water
systems have asked the Agency to approve this analytical method.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/02/04 69 FR 31068
NPRM Comment Period End 07/02/04
Direct Final Action 06/02/04 69 FR 31008
Direct Final Rule Effective 08/31/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4826.
Agency Contact: Lisa Christ, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-8354
Email: christ.lisa@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AE62
[[Page 38314]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3444. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: GROUNDWATER RULE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect the private sector under PL
104-4.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300 g-1``SDWA 1412 (b)(8)'';; 42 USC 300j-4
``SDWA 1445''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, Not later than promulgation of the
Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rule (currently scheduled for October
2004).
Abstract: EPA has proposed a targeted risk-based regulatory strategy
for all public water systems served by groundwater. The proposed
requirements provide a meaningful opportunity to reduce public health
risk for a significant number of people served by groundwater sources
from the exposure to waterborne pathogens from fecal contamination. The
proposed strategy addresses risks through a multiple-barrier approach
that relies on five major components: periodic sanitary surveys of
groundwater systems requiring the evaluation of eight elements and the
identification of significant deficiencies; hydrogeologic assessments
to identify wells sensitive to fecal contamination source water
monitoring for systems drawing from sensitive wells without treatment
or with other indications of risk; a requirement for correction of
significant deficiencies and fecal contamination through the following
actions: eliminate the source of contamination, correct the significant
deficiency, provide an alternative sourcewater, or provide a treatment
which achieves at least 99.99 percent (4-log) inactivation or removal
of viruses, and compliance monitoring to insure disinfection treatment
is reliably operated where it is used.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/10/00 65 FR 30194
Final Action 12/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Additional Information: SAN 2340. Statutory deadline for final rule:
After August 6, 1999, but not later than the Administrator promulgates
a Stage II rulemaking for disinfection byproducts (currently scheduled
for October 2004).
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Crystal Rodgers, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5275
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: rodgers.crystal@epamail.epa.gov
Tracy Bone, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607M, Washington,
DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5257
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: bone.tracy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AA97
_______________________________________________________________________
3445. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: MINOR CORRECTIONS AND
CLARIFICATION TO DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: SDWA 1412
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 140 and 141
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule is intended to make minor changes to clarify and
correct Drinking Water regulations. Typographical errors and
inadvertent omissions will be corrected in the final Long Term 1
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Final Rule. Additional technical
corrections for other drinking water regulations have been added during
the rule development process.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/02/04 69 FR 9781
Final Action 07/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4795.
Agency Contact: Tracy Bone, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5257
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: bone.tracy@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AE58
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3446. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: RADON
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq``SDWA1412''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, February 6, 1999, Publish radon
health risk reduction and cost analysis.
NPRM, Statutory, August 6, 1999.
Final, Statutory, November 2, 2000.
Abstract: The Radon rule complies with the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA) requirement to reduce exposure to radon in homes. In 1999, EPA
proposed regulations for radon which provide flexibility in how to
manage the health risks from radon in drinking water. The proposal was
based on the unique framework in the 1996 SDWA. The proposed regulation
would provide for either a maximum contaminant level (MCL), or an
alternative maximum contaminant level (AMCL) with a multimedia
mitigation (MMM) program to address radon in indoor air. Under the
proposal, public water systems in States that adopted qualifying MMM
programs would be subject to the AMCL, while those in States that did
not adopt such programs would be subject to the MCL. EPA proposed
regulations for radon which provide flexibility in how to manage the
health risks from radon in drinking water. The proposal was based on
the unique framework in the 1996 SDWA. The proposed regulation would
provide for either a maximum contaminant level (MCL), or an alternative
maximum contaminant level (AMCL) with a multimedia mitigation (MMM)
program to address radon in indoor air. Under
[[Page 38315]]
the proposal, public water systems in States that adopted qualifying
MMM programs would be subject to the AMCL, while those in States that
did not adopt such programs would be subject to the MCL. Systems would
also be able to develop a State approved MMM program in the absence of
a State program.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
ANPRM 09/30/86 51 FR 34836
NPRM 07/18/91 56 FR 33050
Notice 02/26/99 64 FR 9560
NPRM 11/02/99 64 FR 59246
Final Action 12/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN 2281.
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Rebeccak Allen, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4689
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: allen.rebeccak@epamail.epa.gov
Richard Reding, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4303T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4656
Fax: 202 566-1053
Email: reding.richard@epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AA94
_______________________________________________________________________
3447. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: LONG TERM 2 ENHANCED
SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE
Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f; 42 USC 300g-1; 42 USC 300g-2; 42 USC
300g-3; 42 USC 300g-4; 42 USC 300g-5; 42 USC 300g-6; 42 USC 300j-4; 42
USC 300j-9; 42 USC 300j-11
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 to 142; 40 CFR 9
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: The Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
(LT2ESWTR) will control risk from microbial pathogens, specifically
cryptosporidium, in drinking water. It is being developed
simultaneously with the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection
Byproducts Rule (DBPR) which will address risk caused by the use of
disinfectants in drinking water. This rule could affect all public
water systems that use surface water as a source. Promulgating the
LT2ESWTR and the Stage 2 DBPR as a paired rulemaking is necessary to
ensure that adequate protection from microbial risk is maintained while
EPA manages risk from disinfection byproducts. In developing the
LT2ESWTR, EPA has analyzed a significant body of new survey data on
microbial pathogens in source and finished waters, as well as data on
parameters which could serve as indicators of microbial risk. This
survey data, which was collected under the Information Collection Rule
(ICR), Supplemental Surveys to the ICR, and additional research
projects, has provided a substantially more comprehensive and complete
picture of the occurrence of waterborne pathogens than was available
previously. EPA has also used significant new data on the efficiency of
treatment processes for the removal and inactivation of microorganisms,
as well as new information on the pathogenicity of certain microbes, to
determine effective regulatory requirements for controlling microbial
risk. On March 30, 1999 EPA established a committee of stakeholders
under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to assist in the
development of these rules; an agreement in principle was signed in
September 2000 outlining the proposed rule options.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/11/03 68 FR 47639
Final Action 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN 4341.
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Dan Schmelling, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5281
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: schmelling.dan@epamail.epa.gov
Thomas Grubbs, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607M, 4607,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5262
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: grubbs.thomas@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD37
_______________________________________________________________________
3448. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: STAGE 2 DISINFECTION
BYPRODUCTS RULE
Priority: Economically Significant
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f; 42 USC 300g-2; 42 USC 300g-3; 42 USC
300g-4; 42 USC 300g-5; 42 USC 300g-6; 42 USC 300j-4; 42 USC 300j-9; 42
USC 300j-11
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 to 142; 40 CFR 9
Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, July 14, 2003.
Abstract: This Regulation, along with a Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR) that will be promulgated
simultaneously, is intended to expand existing public health
protections and address concerns about risk trade-offs between
pathogens and disinfection byproducts. This rule could affect all
public water systems that add a disinfectant to the drinking water
during any part of the treatment process although the impacts may be
limited to community water systems (CWSs) and non-transient non-
community water systems (NTNCWSs). Promulgating the LT2ESWTR and the
Stage 2 DBPR as a paired rulemaking is necessary to ensure that
adequate protection from microbial risk is maintained while EPA manages
risk from disinfection byproducts. In developing the Stage 2 DBPR, EPA
analyzed a significant body of new survey data on source water quality
parameters, treatment data and disinfection byproduct occurrence. This
survey data, which was collected under the Information Collection Rule
(ICR),
[[Page 38316]]
Supplemental Surveys to the ICR, and additional research projects,
provide a substantially more comprehensive and complete picture of the
occurrence of DBPs and microbiological pathogens than was available
previously. EPA also used new information on the health effects of
exposure to DBPs to determine effective regulatory requirements for
controlling risk. On March 30, 1999, EPA reconvened a committee of
stakeholders under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to assist
in the developmentof these rules; an Agreement in Principle was signed
in September 2000 outlining the proposed rule options.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/18/03 68 FR 49548
Final Action 07/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.
Additional Information: SAN 4342.
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Tom Grubbs, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5262
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: grubbs.thomas@epa.gov
Stig Regli, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607M, 4607,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5270
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: regli.stig@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD38
_______________________________________________________________________
3449. NATIONAL SECONDARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS (NSDWR): METHYL
TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) AND TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE NSDWR
Priority: Other Significant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 143 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) is an automobile fuel
additive, introduced in the late 1970s during lead phase-out as an
octane enhancer. It has been used in increasing quantity in the 1990s
to meet the requirement of the Federal Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) and
Oxyfuels programs required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
However, MTBE has been detected in groundwater and drinking water in a
number of States due to leaking underground storage tanks and leaking
pipelines. Although most of these detections are at levels well below
health concern, MTBE's distinctive turpentine-like taste and odor can
be detected at low levels.
EPA is required to make a regulatory determination for at least five
unregulated contaminants by August 2006. Presently, the Water program
is collecting and analyzing research information on occurrence, health
effects, method sensitivity, and treatment effectiveness. A proposed
regulatory determination, which will consider MTBE as well as a number
ofother contaminants, is anticipated for August 2005. To meet this
schedule, management briefings and preliminary decisions on these
unregulated contaminants will be scheduled for fall of 2004.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4404.
Sectors Affected: 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Agency Contact: Irene Dooley, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4699
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: dooley.irene@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD54
_______________________________________________________________________
3450. NATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS: REVISIONS TO THE
TOTAL COLIFORM MONITORING AND ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS AND ADDITIONAL
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates: This action may affect State, local or tribal
governments and the private sector.
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA is revising the Total Coliform Rule (TCR), which was
published in the July 18, 2003 Federal Register (68 FR 42907)(Notice of
Intent to revise the TCR). EPA intends revisions to the TCR to maintain
or provide for greater human health protection than under the existing
TCR while improving system efficiency. A Federal Advisory Committee
recommended that EPA, as part of the TCR 6-year review process,
``initiate a process for addressing cross-connection control and
backflow prevention requirements and consider additional distribution
system requirements related to significant health risks.``The original
TCR, promulgated in 1989, protects human health by requiring microbial
monitoring in drinking water distribution systems. The TCR does not
include distribution system corrective or protective requirements to
reduce contamination from coliforms and other contaminants. Since then,
EPA has gained a better understanding of distribution system impacts on
human health and, therefore, intends tostrengthen the TCR by adding
distribution system requirements. The process to do so involves a
performance evaluation, development of issue papers on both
distribution systems and total coliform, stakeholder meetings, and
proposed and final rules.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/06
Final Action 06/00/08
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal
[[Page 38317]]
Federalism: Undetermined
Additional Information: SAN 4775.
Agency Contact: Kenneth Rotert, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5280
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: rotert.kenneth@epamail.epa.gov
Jennifer Mclain, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5248
Fax: 202 564-3767
Email: mclain.jennifer@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD94
_______________________________________________________________________
3451. DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT CANDIDATE LIST 3
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300g-1(b)
CFR Citation: 00 CFR None
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, February 6, 2008, The 1996 SDWA
Amendments require EPA to publish the third list of candidate
contaminants by February 2008. Not a rulemaking.
Abstract: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) as amended in 1996
requires EPA to publish a list every five years of contaminants that
are known or anticipated to occur in public water systems, and which
may require regulation under the SDWA. The purpose of this action is to
prepare and publish the third Contaminant Candidate List (CCL). In
preparing the third list, EPA will evaluate the classification approach
recommended by the National Academy of Sciences' National Research
Council (NRC) and, as applicable, use the NRC approach to identify and
narrow a very broad universe of potential contaminants into a smaller,
more focused list for future CCLs. If we identify additional
contaminants early in the evaluation process, we will supplement the
CCL List 2 and, if appropriate, we will consider those contaminants in
the regulatory determinations for 2006.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM-Preliminary Notice 02/00/07
Final Notice 02/00/08
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4745.
Agency Contact: Thomas Carpenter, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4885
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: carpenter.thomas@epamail.epa.gov
Yvette Selby, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5245
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: selby.yvette@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD99
_______________________________________________________________________
3452. UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL: UPDATE OF STATE PROGRAMS
Priority: Info./Admin./Other
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300h-1``SDWA 1422''; 42 USC 300h-4``SDWA 1425''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 147 (Revision)
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: EPA provides a place in part 147 of its UIC regulations where
all the State UIC programs are summarized. Included in this
summarization are all the authorities and regulations used by the
States to implement the UIC program, as well as all other documents
that are relevant to the program. The primary reason for this is to
provide one place where all the UIC programs nationwide are presented.
A second reason, more importantly, is to allow EPA to incorporate by
reference into the Code of Federal Regulations the State program
authorities. Current citations to State regulations in 40 CFR part 147
are out of date for many States. This update is necessary to ensure
that the CFR accurately reflects current approved State UIC programs
and that elements of those programs are federally enforceable if
necessary. EPA Regional Offices will be submitting State revision
packages as they are completed. Part 147 will then be updated in
several stages. This is the first stage. This effort should have no
impact on the regulated community because we will merely be
incorporating by reference elements of already effective State
programs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Direct Final Rule To Be Determined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: Federal, State
Additional Information: SAN 4236.
Agency Contact: Mario Salazar, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4606M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-3894
Fax: 202 564-3756
Email: salazar.mario@epamail.epa.gov
Bruce Kobelski, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4606M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-3888
Fax: 202 564-3756
Email: kobelski.bruce@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD40
_______________________________________________________________________
3453. DRINKING WATER: REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS REGARDING CONTAMINANTS
ON THE SECOND DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT CANDIDATE LIST
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.
Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300g-1(b)
CFR Citation: None
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, August 6, 2006, The 1996 SDWA
Amendments require EPA to publish the second regulatory determinations
by August 2006.
Abstract: The 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
require EPA to publish a list of non-regulated contaminants every five
years, which may warrant regulation due to their health effects and
their potential for occurrence in public water systems (PWSs). The
first Contaminant Candidate List (CCL), was published in the Federal
Register on March 2, 1998 (63 FR 10247). The second CCL will be
published in 2004. In addition to publishing the drinking water CCL,
the SDWA also requires the Agencyto select five or more contaminants
from the second CCL and determine, by August 2006, whether to regulate
these contaminants with a National Primary Drinking Water Regulation
(NPDWR). In order to make a determination of
[[Page 38318]]
whether or not to develop an NPDWR for a contaminant, the SDWA requires
three statutory tests be met: 1) the contaminant may have an adverse
effect on the health of persons; 2) the contaminant is known to occur
or there is a substantial likelihood that the contaminant will occur in
public water systems with a frequency and at levels of public health
concern; and 3) in the sole judgment of the Administrator, regulation
of the contaminant presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk
reduction for persons served by public water systems. Using these three
statutory tests to make regulatory decisions, there are three possible
outcomes: 1) regulate the contaminant with an NPDWR; 2) develop
guidance (e.g., Health or Consumer Advisory); or 3) determine no action
is necessary.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Preliminary Notice 08/00/05
Final Notice 08/00/06
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4821.
Agency Contact: Wynne Miller, Environmental Protection Agency, Water,
4607M, 4607M, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4887
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: miller.wynne@epamail.epa.gov
Thomas Carpenter, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4607M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4885
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: carpenter.thomas@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AE60
_______________________________________________________________________
3454. DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT CANDIDATE LIST 2
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq``SDWA1412(b)(1)(B)''
CFR Citation: None
Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, February 6, 2003, Not a rule.
Abstract: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996,
requires the EPA to publish a list of contaminants which, at the time
of publication, are not subject to any proposed or promulgated national
primary drinking water regulations (NPDWRs), that are known or
anticipated to occur in public water systems, and which may require
regulations under SDWA (section 1412(b)(1)). SDWA, as amended,
specifies that EPA must publish the first list of drinking water
contaminants no later than 18 months after the date of enactment, i.e.,
by February, 1998 (henceforth referred to as the 1998 Contaminant
Candidate List or the 1998 CCL), and every five years thereafter. The
CCL2 Federal Register notice announces EPA's decision to carryover the
1998 CCL as the draft CCL2 (minus the nine contaminants addressed under
the 2003 regulatory determination), provides information on EPA's
efforts to expand and strengthen the underlying CCL listing process to
be used for future listings, and requests comment onCCL-related
activities to improve the drinking water contaminant listing process.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Preliminary Notice 04/02/04 69 FR 17406
Final Notice 10/00/04
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: None
Additional Information: SAN 4703.
Agency Contact: Daniel Olson, Environmental Protection Agency, 4607M,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5239
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: olson.daniel@epamail.epa.gov
Jitendra Saxena, Environmental Protection Agency, 4607M, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 564-5243
Fax: 202 564-3760
Email: saxena.jitendra@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2060-AD86
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3455. NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS:
APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF COLIFORMS AND E.
COLI. IN DRINKING WATER
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141.21
Completed:
________________________________________________________________________
Reason Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Action 02/13/04 69 FR 7155
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Government Levels Affected: State, Local, Tribal
Agency Contact: Herb Brass
Phone: 513-569-7936
Fax: 513 569-7191
Email: brass.herb@epamail.epa.gov
James Sinclair
Phone: 513-569-7970
Fax: 513 569-7191
Email: sinclair.james@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AD90
[[Page 38319]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Shore Protection Act (SPA)
_______________________________________________________________________
3456. SHORE PROTECTION ACT, SECTION 4103(B) REGULATIONS
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Legal Authority: 33 USC 2601 ``Shore Protection Act of 1988''; PL 100-
688 ``4103(b)''
CFR Citation: 40 CFR 237
Legal Deadline: None
Abstract: This rule will implement the Shore Protection Act (SPA) and
is designed to prevent the deposit of municipal and commercial waste
into U.S. Coastal Waters. This rule establishes minimum waste handling
practices for vessels and waste handling facilities involved in the
transport of municipal or commercial wastes in the coastal waters of
the United States. The rule may require certain vessels and waste
handling facilities to develop an operation and maintenance manual that
identifies procedures toprevent, report, and clean up deposits of waste
into coastal waters. Local governments and businesses involved with the
vessel transportation and shore side handling of these wastes would be
affected by this rule. Currently no tribes are known to be involved in
waste handling of this type; therefore none would be affected by this
rule. With regard to small businesses, EPA has provided guidance on
development of operation and maintenance manuals and encourages the use
and documentation of existing industry practices that meet or exceed
the EPA proposed minimum waste handling standards. All indications are
that this regulation as proposed would have a minimal economic impact.
This regulation will result in reduction of municipal and commercial
wastes deposited in coastal waters.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/30/94 59 FR 44798
Final Action 08/00/05
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Businesses
Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local
Additional Information: SAN 2820.
Agency Contact: Steven Giordano, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water, 4504T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1272
Fax: 202-566-1546
Email: giordano.steven@epamail.epa.gov
James Woodley, Environmental Protection Agency, Water, 4504T, 4504T,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-566-1288
Fax: 202 566-1546
Email: woodley.james@epamail.epa.gov
RIN: 2040-AB85
[FR Doc. 04-13235 Filed 06-25-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
|
