Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (I/UCRC)
Program Solicitation
|
![]() |
![]() |
National Science Foundation |
![]() | ||
![]() |
Program Title:
Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (I/UCRC)
Synopsis of Program:
The Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers (I/UCRCs) program develops long-term partnerships among industry, academe, and government. The centers are catalyzed by a small investment from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and are primarily supported by industry center members, with NSF taking a supporting role in their development and evolution. Each center is established to conduct research that is of interest to both the industry and the center. An I/UCRC contributes to the Nation's research infrastructure base and enhances the intellectual capacity of the engineering and science workforce through the integration of research and education.
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
Alexander Schwarzkopf, I/UCRC Program Leader, Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education & Centers, 585 N, telephone: (703) 292-8383, fax: (703) 292-9051, email: aschwarz@nsf.gov
Donald R. Price, Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education & Centers, 585 N, telephone: (703) 292-5360, fax: (703) 292-9051, email: dprice@nsf.gov
Tapan K. Mukherjee, Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education & Centers, 585 N, telephone: (703) 292-8381, fax: (703) 292-9051, email: tmukherj@nsf.gov
Glenn H. Larsen, Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, 505 N, telephone: (703) 292-4607, fax: (703) 292-9013, email: glarsen@nsf.gov
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):
- research and graduate program requirements;
- letter of intent; planning grant; and full center proposal requirements;
- cost participation, memberships, and cost sharing requirements.
Each PI must be a tenure-track or tenured faculty member at an institution eligible to apply for an I/UCRC award. The Center Director must be from the lead institution.
The Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers (I/UCRC) Program was initiated in 1973 to develop long term partnerships among industry, academe and government. The National Science Foundation invests in these partnerships to promote research programs of mutual interest, contribute to the Nation's research infrastructure base and enhance the intellectual capacity of the engineering workforce through the integration of research and education.
The Centers are catalyzed by a small investment from NSF and they are primarily supported by Center members, with NSF taking a supporting role in their development and evolution. The I/UCRC Program initially offers five-year awards to Centers. This five-year period allows for the development of a strong partnership between the academic researchers and their industrial and government members. After five years, Centers that continue to meet the I/UCRC Program requirements may apply for a second five-year award. These awards allow Centers to continue to grow and diversify their non-NSF membership. After ten years, the Centers are expected to be fully supported by industrial, other Federal agency, and state and local government partners. A center can re-compete for a new cycle after ten years only if the proposed center involves significant new intellectual substance.
Requirements of an I/UCRC
A Center in the I/UCRC Program must:
An I/UCRC has the following infrastructure:
Other requirements of an I/UCRC include reporting and evaluation.
Establishment of a Center
A Center can be composed of one or more institutions with one Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) reviewing all the researchers' activities. Multi institution centers are encouraged because they provide a broader research base that more readily addresses industry's research needs. Proposals for multi-institution centers must be submitted using the collaborative proposal model in FastLane.
The phases for I/UCRC Program funding are described below. All phases are required for all prospective centers.
(1) Letter of Intent
A letter of intent describing the proposed Center must be submitted to NSF for internal review. The letter of intent must be approved by an I/UCRC Program Director before a proposal for a planning grant award will be accepted. Approval decisions will be made periodically, but no later than three months after receipt of a letter of intent. The proposed Centers that fit within the industry/university collaborative scope, are considered potentially viable, are economically important to the research area, and do not significantly duplicate the research focus of other Centers funded in the program will be encouraged to submit a proposal for a planning grant.
(2) Planning Grant Proposal
A planning grant supplies funds to study the feasibility of developing the industry/university interaction necessary to establish and support a Center. As part of this study, it is a requirement that a meeting that brings together potential members to explore opportunities and establish a research plan that fits their needs be held. Planning grant proposals will be reviewed competitively by a panel.
(3) Center Proposal
Submission of a proposal requires that all institutions comply with all the financial requirements listed in the Eligibility Information section of this document. The NSF support is generally "seed funds" used to augment support for administration of the Center.
The initial I/UCRC award to a Center has a potential duration of five years, assuming sufficiently meritorious achievement and success at maintaining leverage of NSF support.
The initial I/UCRC award may be extended for an additional period of up to five years following a successful renewal review guided by peer evaluation and a favorable recommendation by the NSF Program Director.
(4) Collaborations with Additional Institutions
Support is available for additional institutions to join an existing or proposed center in the I/UCRC Program. See Award Information for details.
(5) Competition to Start New I/UCRC Funding Cycle
Because the goal of a Center is to become self-sufficient after the full ten-year funding cycle, the I/UCRC Program will not continue to fund operating Centers after ten years. This allows the limited I/UCRC Program funds to be used to establish new Centers. However, if an operating Center that is in its tenth year of I/UCRC support adds significantly new intellectual substance to its research program and continues to meet the criteria of the I/UCRC Program, it may submit a full proposal for a new I/UCRC award with the same operating parameters as an initial award. No letter of intent or planning grant proposal is required in this process. These proposals will undergo merit review. Awards will be based on the relative merit of the proposals and on a balance of support for both new Centers and those requesting the initiation of a new funding cycle.
Universities and colleges with research and graduate programs are eligible as lead and collaborating institutions for I/UCRC Program support. Since a comprehensive range of disciplines and skills is necessary to address research issues of interest to industry, it may be necessary to form a consortium of universities to achieve a critical mass of interdisciplinary research capabilities for the formation of a center. In that case, one of the universities acts as the administrative lead for the center and each partner is expected to attract industrial support to the Center.
A Letter of Intent must be approved by the NSF Program Director before the institution may submit a planning grant proposal. Institutions must have been awarded a planning grant before they are eligible to submit a full center proposal.
To be eligible for the I/UCRC Program, the Center must obtain firm commitments of $300,000 annually for five years in cash membership fees. Support must include a minimum of six Center members with a membership fee of $25,000 or higher per year. Center members should be from industry, organizations, or other Federal agencies. If a center is multi-institutional, each institution must obtain cost participation of $150,000 annually in cash membership fees for 5 years generated by a minimum of 3 center members with a membership fee of $25,000 or higher per year.
Each grantee is required to certify that it will provide 25% cost sharing of the annual membership fees generated by that institution for research in the center.
Planning Grant - 12 month standard
award.
$10,000 per institution for a planning grant award for 12
months.
Center Awards - continuing or standard grant.
About $400,000 per year is available for new awards pending the availability of funds. The annual I/UCRC program budget is approximately $5.2 million.
Centers may be based at a single institution, or may be multi-institutional. The initial I/UCRC award to a Center has a potential duration of five years, assuming sufficiently meritorious achievement and success at maintaining leverage of NSF support.
The I/UCRC program funds awards at two levels:
For multi-institution centers, institutions obtaining an annual cost participation between $150,000 and $300,000 can receive up to $50,000 annually.
(Note The center must obtain a total of $300,000 in cost participation to receive an award)
Institutions obtaining $300,000 or more annually in cost participation can receive up to $70,000 annually.
NSF support is intended to augment the support the Center receives from industry and other sponsors. Proposals for Center awards are evaluated using external peer review.
Support, in accordance with multi-institution center requirements of the previous paragraph, is available for additional institutions to join centers in the I/UCRC Program. In order to join, the collaborative institution must meet the requirements listed in Section III. Eligibility Information. For these multi-institution centers, additional funds are available to the lead institution to offset the added administrative burden. Lead institutions generally receive up to $10,000 per year for each university added to the center.
Renewals
Continuing I/UCRC Program support is subject to the Center fully meeting the I/UCRC operational requirements with a high level of quality and industrial involvement being met each year. The initial I/UCRC award may be extended for an additional period of up to five years following a successful renewal review guided by merit review and a favorable recommendation by the NSF Program Director. NSF I/UCRC Program support for the second five-year award will be up to one half of the amount of the initial award. Additional support for evaluation will be funded
Letters of Intent
(required):
A letter of intent describing a proposed Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) must be submitted to the I/UCRC Program for internal review and approval by an I/UCRC Program Director before a proposal for a planning grant will be accepted. Those proposed Centers that fit within the industry/university collaborative scope, are considered potentially viable, and do not significantly duplicate the research foci of other Centers currently funded in the program will be encouraged to submit a proposal for a planning grant.
(1) Guide to Submission of a Letter of Intent for an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center
Format- Letter of Intent
Letters of intent are to be submitted via Fastlane which is accessible from the NSF web site at http://www.nsf.gov. The Project Description should include:
A brief description of the research focus of the potential Center (limited to 1 page maximum);
A list of the participating universities or colleges and faculty members (limited to 3 pages maximum).
Full Proposal Instructions:
Proposals submitted in response to this program announcement/solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF Website at: http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpg. Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
(2) Guide to Submission of a Planning Grant Proposal for an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center
Introduction- Planning Grant
Planning grant proposals are accepted only if the letter of intent describing a proposed I/UCRC has been approved by an I/UCRC Program Director. Planning grants are used to plan the joint industry/university research agenda and to determine the feasibility and viability of developing a Center. Proposals are merit reviewed in accordance with NSF policy.
Format- Planning Grant
Proposals for Planning Grants must be submitted electronically via Fastlane, accessible from the NSF web site at http://www.nsf.gov.
Project Summary
Project Description
Model of the Envisioned Center
A full description of the envisioned Center is required, including:
Detail how the objectives of the planning grant will be achieved. Include:
Budget
Support is generally for travel, an industry planning meeting, publications and faculty time. Note any other sources of funds to be used in this study.
Industry Endorsements
Letters from at least six potential Center members must accompany
the proposal. These letters should note that the Center's concept
and proposed research agenda have the potential for receiving
support from industry and that the firm or organization would
consider joining if the Center were formed. Enter these in
the Supplementary Documents section of Fastlane.
(3) Guide to Submission of a Center Proposal for an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center
Introduction - Center Proposal
Support from NSF for Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers is awarded as seed funds to develop a partnership between industry and academe, with NSF taking the role of a facilitator. A significant proportion of a Center's support is expected to come from industrial, state, and other funds. As a Center progresses, it is likely to have increased opportunities for funding from additional firms, other Federal agencies, Federal laboratories, and state and local governments, thus increasing the leverage of NSF funds.
To be eligible to submit a proposal, a Center is required to have been awarded a planning grant. In addition, the Center is to comply with the financial requirements as listed in the Eligibility Information section of this document. This helps provide for the minimum funding needed to support a vital research agenda and to ensure that the Center can support graduate students and research projects. The minimum number of members required produces a critical mass and encourages a more generic research program. In general, Center members are industrial firms, although some may be other organizations such as Federal agencies.
Proposal Format- Center Proposals
The proposal should reflect the unique combination of the proposing institution's research interests, capabilities, and potential for working with industry. These features should be discussed in sufficient detail to facilitate review in accordance with the I/UCRC Program requirements. The following narrative outline is recommended to replace the project description outline given in the Grant Proposal Guide. This narrative should be no longer than 30 pages.
a. Introduction
In no more than three pages, describe the technical focus of and need for the Center. Describe the technical area, the industry, the research required and the expertise and resources that will be used to address this need.
b. Center Structure and Operations
Proposers must discuss the following issues in their
proposals:
c. Research Plan
For each research project proposed for the Center, describe (in
no more than three pages per project):
d. Financial Management of the Center
The proposal should include :
In addition to the information requested in the project description, include the following items in the appropriate section of FastLane.
The following information should be added to the Supplemental Docs section of Fastlane:
Target Dates for Proposal Submission
There are no specific target dates for Center proposals but a Center Proposal must be received within 18 months of award of a planning grant. Allow about six months between receipt of the formal proposal and the final decision.
Proposers are reminded to identify the program announcement/solicitation number (01-116) in the program announcement/solicitation block on the proposal Cover Sheet. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
Cost Sharing:
The proposed cost sharing must be shown on Line M on the proposal budget. Documentation of the availability of cost sharing must be included in the proposal. Only items which would be allowable under the applicable cost principles, if charged to the project, may be included as the awardee's contribution to cost sharing. Contributions may be made from any non-Federal source, including non-Federal grants or contracts, and may be cash or in-kind (see OMB Circular A-110, Section 23). It should be noted that contributions counted as cost-sharing toward projects of another Federal agency may not be counted towards meeting the specific cost-sharing requirements of the NSF award. All cost-sharing amounts are subject to audit. Failure to provide the level of cost-sharing reflected in the approved award budget may result in termination of the NSF award, disallowance of award costs and/or refund of award funds to NSF.
Proposals must be submitted by the following date(s):
None Specified.
Target Dates
For Letters of Intent, allow up to three months for notification of the approval decision. For planning grants and full center proposals, allow up to six months between receipt of the formal proposal and the final decision.
Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this announcement/solicitation through the FastLane system. Detailed instructions for proposal preparation and submission via FastLane are available at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program announcement/solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this announcement/solicitation.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications). The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Proposers are no longer required to provide a paper copy of the signed Proposal Cover Sheet to NSF. Further instructions regarding this process are available on the FastLane Website at: http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov
Reviews of proposals submitted to NSF are solicited from peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. NSF invites the proposer to suggest, at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts with the proposer. Special efforts are made to recruit reviewers from non-academic institutions, minority-serving institutions, or adjacent disciplines to that principally addressed in the proposal.
The National Science Board approved revised criteria for evaluating proposals at its meeting on March 28, 1997 (NSB 97-72). All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.
On July 8, 2002, the NSF Director issued Important Notice 127, Implementation of new Grant Proposal Guide Requirements Related to the Broader Impacts Criterion. This Important Notice reinforces the importance of addressing both criteria in the preparation and review of all proposals submitted to NSF. NSF continues to strengthen its internal processes to ensure that both of the merit review criteria are addressed when making funding decisions.
In an effort to increase compliance with these requirements, the January 2002 issuance of the GPG incorporated revised proposal preparation guidelines relating to the development of the Project Summary and Project Description. Chapter II of the GPG specifies that Principal Investigators (PIs) must address both merit review criteria in separate statements within the one-page Project Summary. This chapter also reiterates that broader impacts resulting from the proposed project must be addressed in the Project Description and described as an integral part of the narrative.
Effective October 1, 2002, NSF will return without review proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria within the Project Summary. It is believed that these changes to NSF proposal preparation and processing guidelines will more clearly articulate the importance of broader impacts to NSF-funded projects.
The two National Science Board approved merit review criteria are listed below (see the Grant Proposal Guide Chapter III.A for further information). The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which he/she is qualified to make judgments.
NSF staff will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions:
Evaluation
Letters of Intent will be evaluated by NSF staff based on the economic importance of the research area, the quality and quantity of the proposed research and the researchers. The NSF evaluation will be furnished to the author of the Letter of Intent. Notification of approval of the Letter of Intent is required before submission of a planning grant proposal.
Planning grant proposals will be competitively
reviewed by mail and/or panel review. The proposals will be subject
to the NSF merit review criteria and the additional criteria given
below:
Center proposals will be subject to NSF merit review criteria. In addition, the technical and managerial quality of the proposed Center, the qualifications of the proposers, the level of industrial involvement and the likelihood of achieving the goals of the I/UCRC program will be considered. Accordingly, the NSF reviewers will consider the extent to which there is evidence that the Center will meet the "Requirements of an I/UCRC" as described in Section II. Program Description.
All proposals are carefully reviewed by at least three other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular field represented by the proposal. Proposals submitted in response to this announcement/solicitation will be reviewed by Ad Hoc and/or panel review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Director. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.
NSF is striving to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on the date of receipt. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program Division administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See section VI.A. for additional information on the review process.)
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (NSF-GC-1); * or Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Terms and Conditions * and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative agreement awards also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions (CA-1). Electronic mail notification is the preferred way to transmit NSF awards to organizations that have electronic mail capabilities and have requested such notification from the Division of Grants and Agreements.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at http://www.nsf.gov/home/grants/grants_gac.htm. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (301) 947-2722 or by e-mail from pubs@nsf.gov.
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions is contained in the NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Chapter II, available electronically on the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gpm. The GPM is also for sale through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402. The telephone number at GPO for subscription information is (202) 512-1800. The GPM may be ordered through the GPO Website at http://www.gpo.gov.
Special Award Conditions:
Near the end of each 12-month period, the Program Director/and or the Division Director of the Engineering Education and Centers Division will review the Center on a number of renewal criteria including the following: 1) the extent to which the industry/university interaction is developing; 2) the extent to which the support base is developing; 3) the extent to which a robust research program is developing. If the review is satisfactory, the Program Director will recommend support for the next period of this continuing award.
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the PI must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period.
Centers are required to annually submit the following:
Centers are required to submit an annual report 90 days prior to the anniversary of their NSF award. These reports are used as a basis for assessing annual performance and determining continued funding. The annual report is to include:
Within 90 days after the expiration of an award, the PI also is required to submit a final project report. Failure to provide final technical reports delays NSF review and processing of pending proposals for the PI and all Co-PIs. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project reporting system, available through FastLane, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. This system permits electronic submission and updating of project reports, including information on project participants (individual and organizational), activities and findings, publications, and other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system.
General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:
Alexander Schwarzkopf, I/UCRC Program Leader, Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education & Centers, 585 N, telephone: (703) 292-8383, fax: (703) 292-9051, email: aschwarz@nsf.gov
Donald R. Price, Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education & Centers, 585 N, telephone: (703) 292-5360, fax: (703) 292-9051, email: dprice@nsf.gov
Tapan K. Mukherjee, Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education & Centers, 585 N, telephone: (703) 292-8381, fax: (703) 292-9051, email: tmukherj@nsf.gov
Glenn H. Larsen, Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, 505 N, telephone: (703) 292-4607, fax: (703) 292-9013, email: glarsen@nsf.gov
For further information, visit the I/UCRC Program web site at http://www.eng.nsf.gov/eec/i-ucrc.htm
For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact:
Esther M. Bolding, Directorate for Engineering, Division of Engineering Education & Centers, 585 N, telephone: (703) 292-8380, fax: (703) 292-9051, email: ebolding@nsf.gov
The NSF Guide to Programs is a compilation of funding for research and education in science, mathematics, and engineering. The NSF Guide to Programs is available electronically at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?gp. General descriptions of NSF programs, research areas, and eligibility information for proposal submission are provided in each chapter.
Many NSF programs offer announcements or solicitations concerning specific proposal requirements. To obtain additional information about these requirements, contact the appropriate NSF program offices. Any changes in NSF's fiscal year programs occurring after press time for the Guide to Programs will be announced in the NSF E-Bulletin, which is updated daily on the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov/home/ebulletin, and in individual program announcements/solicitations. Subscribers can also sign up for NSF's Custom News Service (http://www.nsf.gov/home/cns/start.htm) to be notified of new funding opportunities that become available.
I/UCRC Supplemental Programs
Centers in the I/UCRC Program are eligible for $5,000 per year per institution per center to support a woman, under-represented minority or disabled undergraduate research assistant to perform Center research. Additionally, the I/UCRC Program will supply up to $25,000 per year per center for one or two years to support Center research performed by a faculty member from an undergraduate or predominantly undergraduate institution. This proposal must be approved by the Center's IAB, and the research may be performed either at the Center or the faculty member's home institution.
Research Experience for Teachers (RET)
Centers are eligible to submit proposals to the Research Experience for Teachers (RET) supplement opportunity (NSF- 00-118). This supplement enables the Center to build long term collaborative relationships and support the active participation of K-12 mathematics and science teachers (particularly middle school and secondary school teachers) in research of the Center. This project has a duration of one year. The maximum request may be up to $25,000 per institution per award and may be carried out during the summer or academic year or both.
Other
Centers in the I/UCRC Program also may submit proposals to other NSF programs such as Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU); Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI); Combined Research-Curriculum Development; etc. Further information on these programs may be found on the NSF web site at http://www.nsf.gov. Proposals for these programs should follow the guidelines given in the Grant Proposal Guide and the appropriate program announcement. Centers in the I/UCRC Program also may apply for funds from other Federal agencies, and NSF can act as an intermediary in processing these funds.
The National Science Foundation (NSF) funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. Awardees are wholly responsible for conducting their project activities and preparing the results for publication. Thus, the Foundation does not assume responsibility for such findings or their interpretation.
NSF welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers and educators. The Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities and persons with disabilities to compete fully in its programs. In accordance with Federal statutes, regulations and NSF policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from NSF, although some programs may have special requirements that limit eligibility.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student research assistants) to work on NSF-supported projects. See the GPG Chapter II, Section D.2 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov
|
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies needing information as part of the review process or in order to coordinate programs; and to another Federal agency, court or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 267 (January 5, 1998), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 63 Federal Register 268 (January 5, 1998). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, Division of Administrative Services, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230.
OMB control number: 3145-0058.
![]() |
||
nsf.gov![]() |
| About NSF | Funding | Publications | News & Media | Search | Site Map | Help | |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
The National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA Tel: 703-292-5111, FIRS: 800-877-8339 | TDD: 703-292-5090 |
Contact
NSF Customize |