Social, Behavioral, and Economic SciencesSocial and  Economic SciencesNational Science Foundation
NSF.GOV SBE HOME BCS HOME SES HOME NUGGETS FASTLANE
Programs
Cross-Directorate Activities
Decision, Risk and Management Sciences
Economics
Innovation and Organizational Change
Law and Social Science
Methodology, Measurement and Statistics
Political Science
Science and Technology Studies
Societal Dimensions of Engineering, Science, and Technology
Sociology
Resources
SES Staff Directory
Divisional Q&As
Proposal Submission & Target Dates
Search Award Abstracts
FastLane
Human Subjects Info
Online Documents
Note:
Also see the Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS)

Back to Top

Proposal and Submission Guidelines
Format

All proposals must be submitted by your institution's Sponsored Research Office through Fastlane, NSF's web-based system. Please go to http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov for details.

Maximum Length of the Proposal's Project Description
15 single-spaced pages
This page limit is strictly enforced by the Foundation. Tables and figures as well as appendices are now included in the 15-page limit. See the Grant Proposal Guide guidelines for further details. It is appropriate to include brief samples of questionnaires in an appendix, but explicit permission for appendices must be obtained from the Program Officer and documented as such in the proposal.

Content of the Project Description
The Project Description should be a detailed research design. It should clearly indicate the research question, the importance of the theoretical contribution of and motivation for the research, and the methodology that will be used to answer the question. The research design should be as specific as possible.

Review Process
Each proposal normally receives at least 3 written advisory reviews. Each proposal is sent to about 6 outside reviewers and is also evaluated by a Program's Advisory Panel. The Advisory Panels are composed of scientists representing a range of subfields in that Program.

Evaluation Criteria
NSF uses two broad criteria of scientific merit in the selection of research projects for funding, the intellectual merit and the broader impacts of the proposed activities:

Intellectual merit is interpreted by the program as having three components:

  • Theoretical significance, or the importance of the project in advancing conceptual understanding within cultural anthropology or allied fields of social science.
  • Research competence, or the qualifications of the investigator to conduct the project, as shown by the quality of prior work.
  • Research design and methodology, or the ability of the specific activities described to actually advance our knowledge of the theoretical issues.

The broader impacts of the proposed activities refers to the project's ability to benefit society at large in any of a number of ways, encompassing enhancing scientific understanding through broad dissemination; promoting teaching, training and learning; broadening the participation of underrepresented groups; and enhancing the infrastructure for research and education, such as networks and partnerships.

Another way of thinking of scientific merit is for researchers to ask themselves these questions:

  • What theoretical question will your new data answer?
  • What does the literature lead you to expect the outcome to be?
  • What data will you gather to assess the empirical situation?
  • How will you analyze the data to see if your theoretical expectation is supported or contradicted?
  • Why should society-at-large be interested in the new knowledge your project creates?

Percentage of Proposals Funded
About 25%

Average Size of a Funded Project
About $65,000, (including indirect costs) though PIs should request the amount of funding necessary to complete the project successfully. It usually helps to discuss specific budget questions with the program officer.

Typical Duration of Projects
2 Years, though NSF encourages projects of longer duration when the multi-year activities are explicitly justified.

Common Terms
Target Date
A date identifying the day by which proposals are expected to be received by NSF for the current funding cycle. Proposals received after the target date will be reviewed but the review may be delayed until the next review cycle.

Deadline
Deadlines are cutoff dates after which proposals usually will not be accepted for review by NSF. In special competitions for which deadlines have been set, the program typically does not have the authority to waive this requirement. Deadlines identified in proposal solicitations are enforced.

Publication Requests
You may request printed NSF publications by sending an email message to pubs@nsf.gov. When making a request, please include the following information:

  1. NSF publication number,
  2. number of copies; and
  3. your complete mailing address.

Back to Top



The Division of Social and Economic Sciences
Suite 995, National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230 USA
Tel: 703-292-8760
Last Updated 04.27.04
Contact SES Webmaster