The physical anthropology program encourages exploratory, "high-risk",
innovative or pilot projects which have the potential to be expanded
and lead to significant new knowledge. Projects which face severe
time constraints because of transient phenomena or access to materials
may also be considered. Applicants may submit brief proposals at
any time and request up to a total of $25,000 including indirect
costs. Proposals will be evaluated by outside experts and considered
separately from regular research projects; thus, an accelerated
review will be possible. Depending on timing, urgency, and topic,
the proposal may be discussed at panel, though it will not be 'competing'
with full proposals for funds. A project which costs $25,000 or
less but is not an exploratory or pilot project as defined below
should be submitted as a "regular" application.
Who may submit
Proposals are welcomed from US institutions, including undergraduate
institutions, on behalf of all qualified researchers. Graduate students
may not submit High Risk proposals (Grants for Improving Doctoral
Dissertations are available for students).
Definition of Exploratory, "High Risk" Projects
Proposals accepted in this competition will be sent to specialists
for peer review but will avoid the normal panel examination. The
purpose of by-passing the normal panel review is to ensure that
significant projects are not declined because of a panel's normal
preference to downgrade extremely risky research. A project
will be considered "risky" if the data may not be obtainable in
spite of all reasonable preparation on the researcher's part.
For example, a physical anthropologist may propose a theoretically
significant field project to study demographic changes in a small
population in Greece. The project may hinge on the exact content
and accessibility of church records on a small island. The panel
may downgrade a more expensive request for a full study on the grounds
that the data may not be up to the task. Additional library study
by the researcher can not answer this question -- a brief trip to
the field site is necessary to verify that the theoretically significant
data on demographic change are in fact obtainable.
Proposals for extremely urgent research where access to the data
may not be available in the normal review schedule, even with all
reasonable preparation by the researcher, are also appropriate for
this competition.
Review Criteria
The primary criteria for funding at the National Science Foundation
are the scientific merit of the project as reflected in peer reviews
which focus on the theoretical significance of the knowledge to
be gained, the methodological soundness of the approach, the capacity
of the researcher to complete the project, and the utility or social
relevance of the new knowledge to be gained. As with all proposals,
the broader impacts resulting from the proposed activity must be
addressed. Chapter
III of the Grant Proposal Guide (NSF
03-2) provides further discussion of the NSF merit review criteria.
Proposal Preparation and Submission
Proposals must be specifically discussed with the program officer
before they are submitted. In many cases proposals may be better
reviewed through the normal full panel review where the budget is
not limited. Only proposals meeting the criteria as specified above
will be accepted into this funding opportunity.
Project descriptions should not exceed ten single-spaced pages.
The cover page should reference Program Announcement NSF
01-153.
Proposals should follow the guidelines specified in Grant Proposal
Guide (GPG)
except for the length specified above.
Submission Date
Proposals may be submitted at any time. Decisions will be announced
about four months after submission. Prospective applicants should
communicate with the program director:
____________________________________
Mark L. Weiss, Program Director for Physical Anthropology
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rm. 995
Arlington VA 22230
(703) 292-7321
Fax: (703) 292-9068
mweiss@nsf.gov
____________________________________
The National Science Foundation strongly encourages women, minorities,
and persons with disabilities to compete fully in this competition.
In accordance with Federal statutes and regulations and NSF policies,
no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin,
or disability shall be excluded from participation in, denied the
benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or
activity receiving financial assistance from the National Science
Foundation.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities
provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons
with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student
research assistants) to work on a NSF project. See GPG
, Ch. 5. For information, contact: Programs
for Persons with Disabilities,
Directorate for Education and Human Resources (703) 306-8636
NSF has TDD (Telephone Device for the Deaf) and Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing
impairments to communicate with the Foundation. To access TDD phone
(703) 306-0090; FIRS 1-800-877-8339.