Answers
to Frequent Proposal Preparation Questions
If I submit a proposal what is the probability
it will be funded?
Success rates (# awards / # submissions) are determined by the
Program’s annual budget and the number of proposals received. Although
these vary yearly, the fluctuations are usually minor and the data
below provide a reasonable guide.
Fiscal year 2000:
|
Submissions
|
Awards
|
Success Rate
|
Senior Research |
110
|
38
|
35%
|
Archaeometry |
7
|
2
|
29%
|
Doctoral Dissertations |
76
|
39
|
51%
|
High Risk |
2
|
1
|
50%
|
REU Supplements |
11
|
11
|
100%
|
I am a "classical" or "historical"
archaeologist, geochemist, paleontologist ... . What constitutes
the kind of "anthropologically significant" archaeology
which the Archaeology Program supports?
The Program frequently funds researchers with non-Anthropology
degrees and it actively encourages such individuals to apply. The
Program provides support for technique development and ancillary
studies often proposed by non-archaeologists and does not limit
its scope by either time period or geographical region. Successful
applicants however must convincingly demonstrate that their research
is significant from an anthropological perspective and that it addresses
questions of interest to anthropological archaeologists.
My work is interdisciplinary. What should I do?
The NSF recognizes that innovative research often lies at or
between traditional disciplinary boundaries and encourages interdisciplinary
and multidisciplinary research. A potential applicant should contact
a relevant program Director and discuss their particular project.
For administrative reasons a proposal may be submitted to only one
Program. However it can be jointly evaluated and funded by several.
This is a common practice in archaeology and projects do not slip
between the cracks. Experience indicates that review by multiple
Programs may best be viewed as multiple opportunities for support
and not as double jeopardy.
My project involves multiple researchers at several
institutions. How should I handle this?
There are several mechanisms to provide support to researchers at
multiple institutions and to accomplish this within the framework
of a single project. These include subcontracts, collaborative awards
and a central plan of administration by a single institution. Although
one needs to consider carefully which mechanism is most appropriate
in a specific case, none are cumbersome and all are regularly employed.
Applicants should call the Program Director to discuss the details,
advantages and disadvantages of each alternative.
Can I submit a "late" proposal?
NSF distinguishes between "deadlines" and "target
dates." Deadlines are absolute and proposals received after
a deadline are not accepted. Target dates allow flexibility and
leeway is permissible. For those Archaeology competitions with target
dates, there is no need to inform the Program Director if a proposal
will be a week or two late. If the delay will be significantly more,
please contact to make certain it can still be included in the pending
review cycle. For some competitions, requests may be submitted at
any time.
I am not a U.S. citizen. Can I still submit an
application?
Rules vary by competition. In most cases, including all Archaeology
Program specific competitions, the citizenship of a researcher is
not relevant and the NSF requires only that the proposal be submitted
through a U.S. based institution. Thus the Program often provides
doctoral dissertation support to foreign nationals enrolled in U.S.
Ph.D. programs. It can not, however, support U.S. citizens enrolled
abroad. Some NSF competitions do have nationality requirements and
potential applicants should read specific program announcements
carefully.
I do not have an institutional affiliation. Can
I still submit an application?
Unaffiliated researchers may submit proposals directly to NSF.
The Grant Proposal Guide limits a project description
to 15 single spaced pages. How strictly is this rule enforced?
In infrequent and well justified circumstances "senior
archaeology" and "archaeometry" applicants, with
Program Director permission, may include several pages of figures
in the "Supplementary Material" section of the proposal
and reference this in the project description text. If you find
this is necessary, please contact the Program Director. Project
descriptions in dissertation and high risk exploratory proposals
are strictly limited to 10 pages of text and 5 pages of figures.
One may increase the number of figure pages at the expense of text
but not the reverse.
After I submit my application how soon may I
expect an answer?
Senior research and archaeometry proposals undergo both "outside"
and panel review. The Archaeology Panel meets twice yearly, usually
in late October or early November and again in conjunction with
the Society for American Archaeology meeting in the Spring. The
Archaeometry Panel meets once yearly, usually in conjunction with
the SAA meeting as well. Applicants may contact the Program Director
to determine the date of the relevant panel and then either email
or call after the meeting for information. Although a definitive
answer may not be available, by this time the likely outcome for
most applications will be clear. Dissertation and high risk proposals
receive outside review only and are evaluated on a case by case
basis. Although official notification takes considerably longer
the average time between proposal submission and Program recommendation
is 12 weeks and applicants are welcome to contact the Program director
at the appropriate time.
May I suggest names of potential reviewers and/or
non-reviewers?
The Fastlane system permits one to suggest reviewers and non-reviewers
and many applicants take advantage of this option. Please make certain
not to include individuals with whom you have research, financial
or institutional ties. The Program pays close attention to such
requests. Only in the most exceptional circumstances - usually when
the number is inordinately large - would an application be sent
to individuals on the do-not-use list.
|