skip primary navigation
NIEHS NIH health and human services EHP Home Page



Advanced Search
Become a Print Subscriber
Subscribe online today!
Subscriber Services
Buy EHP Publications
View Shopping Cart
Advertising Information
EHP 2004 Review Issue
EHP is now Open Access

www.mdbiotechinc.com

www.embitec.com

www.firstgov.gov
skip secondary navigation

Workshop Summary


 
Applying New Biotechnologies to the Study of Occupational Cancer - A Workshop Summary

Mark Toraason,1,* Richard Albertini,2 Steven Bayard,3 William Bigbee,4 Aaron Blair,5 Paolo Boffetta,6 Stefano Bonassi,7 Steven Chanock,5 David Christiani,8 David Eastmond,9 Samuel Hanash,10 Carol Henry,11 Fred Kadlubar,12 Frank Mirer,13 Daniel Nebert,14 Stephen Rapport,15 Kathleen Rest,16 Nathaniel Rothman,5 Avima Ruder,1 Russell Savage,1,* Paul Schulte,1,* Jack Siemiatycki,17 Peter Shields,18 Martyn Smith,19 Paige Tolbert,20 Roel Vermeulen,5 Paolo Vineis,21 Sholom Wacholder,5 Elizabeth Ward,22,* Michael Waters,23 and Ainsley Weston24
1National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; 2University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA; 3Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA; 4University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; 5National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 6International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; 7National Institute for Research on Cancer, Genoa, Italy; 8Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 9University of California, Riverside, California, USA; 10University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; 11American Chemistry Council, Arlington, Virginia, USA; 12National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA; 13Health and Safety Department, International Union, United Auto Workers, Detroit, Michigan, USA; 14University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; 15University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 16National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC, USA; 17University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; 18Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; 19University of California, Berkeley, California, USA; 20Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 21University of Torino, Torino, Italy; 22 American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 23National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; 24National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA

Abstract
As high-throughput technologies in genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics evolve, questions arise about their use in the assessment of occupational cancers. To address these questions, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the American Chemistry Council sponsored a workshop 8-9 May 2002 in Washington, DC. The workshop brought together 80 international specialists whose objective was to identify the means for best exploiting new technologies to enhance methods for laboratory investigation, epidemiologic evaluation, risk assessment, and prevention of occupational cancer. The workshop focused on identifying and interpreting markers for early biologic effect and inherited modifiers of risk. Key words: biomarkers, chemical exposure, epidemiology, gene-environment interactions, genomics, occupational cancer, polymorphisms, proteomics, risk assessment, toxicogenomics. Environ Health Perspect 112:413-416 (2004). [Online 14 January 2004]


Address corresponding to M. Toraason, NIOSH C23, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH, 45226 USA. Telephone: (513) 533-8207. Fax: (513) 533-8138. E-mail: mtoraason@cdc.gov

*These authors were responsible for developing the summary based on speaker presentations at the workshop.

The workshop was cosponsored by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the American Chemistry Council.

The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Received 18 March 2003; accepted 14 January 2004.


doi:doi:10.1289/txg.6343 available via http://dx.doi.org/

You can read this entire article in HTML or PDF.