This web site was copied prior to January 20, 2005. It is now a Federal record managed by the National Archives and Records Administration. External links, forms, and search boxes may not function within this collection. Learn more.   [hide]
EPA National News: PR 20 NEW REFORMS CAP TWO YEAR EFFORT TO REFORM SUPERFUND
Skip common site navigation and headers
United States Environmental Protection Agency
National News
begin hierarchial links EPA > National News > End hierarchial links



 

PR 20 NEW REFORMS CAP TWO YEAR EFFORT TO REFORM SUPERFUND

PR 20 NEW REFORMS CAP TWO YEAR EFFORT TO REFORM SUPERFUND

MONDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1995

20 NEW REFORMS CAP TWO-YEAR EFFORT TO REFORM SUPERFUND; EPA ADMINISTRATOR CALLS FOR LEGISLATIVE CHANGES

Twenty new "common sense" administrative reforms to the Superfun= d toxic=20
waste cleanup program were announced today by U.S. Environmental Pr= otection=20
Agency Administrator Carol M. Browner, culminating the Clinton Admini= stration's=20
two-year effort to fundamentally redirect Superfund to make it faster= , fairer=20
and more efficient. Browner called on Congress to complete the refor= m of =20
Superfund through legislative changes, noting that these administrati= ve=20
improvements represent the final changes that can be made without new= =20
reauthorizing legislation.
Today's reforms -- the third round of Clinton Administration ref= orms --=20
intend to assist state and local governments, communities, and indust= ries=20
involved in Superfund cleanups to more easily: 1) make cost-effective= cleanup=20
choices that protect public health and the environment; 2) reduce lit= igation so=20
more time can be spent on cleanup and less on lawyers; and 3) help co= mmunities=20
become more informed and involved so that cleanup decisions make the = most sense=20
at the community level.=20

"The Clinton Administration believes that Superfund is broken an= d needs to=20
be fixed -- that's why we've worked for two years on administrative r= eforms to=20
make Superfund faster, fairer and more efficient," Browner said. "Bu= t=20
administrative reforms can only do so much. Ultimately, Congress mus= t change=20
the law if we are to protect public health and the environment for th= e one in=20
four Americans who live near a toxic waste dump."

Browner added, "We believe Congressional reforms must include th= ree=20
principles: First, polluters, not taxpayers, must pay for cleanup. S= econd, we=20
must speed cleanups and lower costs to return more property to commun= ities for=20
their productive use. And third, communities should have a role in s= electing=20
cleanup plans that protect public health and make economic and enviro= nmental=20
sense."

Some of the new reforms will aim to control costs while protecti= ng public=20
health by assuring more consistency, streamline processes to save tim= e and=20
money, create new choices for cost-effective cleanup options, and enc= ourage=20
economic redevelopment. Among these reforms will be the establishmen= t of cost-
effectiveness "rules of thumb" and an EPA National Remedy Review Boar= d that will=20
ensure costs are appropriate to cleanup needs; setting criteria for r= eopening=20
remedy decisions at select sites where new and better science will ac= hieve the=20
same level of protection with potential cost savings; directives to e= nsure=20
rigorous attention to costs in the development of cleanup options and= remedy=20
selection; and national risk-based priority setting to select sites f= or funding=20
based on the principle of cleanup of "worst sites first."

The cost-effectiveness reforms also include specific efforts to = ensure=20
appropriate health protection in the decisionmaking process, through = involving=20
=0C=00
stakeholders in designing accurate, site-specific risk assessments. T=

    ° make=20
    Superfund sites more attractive for economic redevelopment, the refo= rms include=20
    an effort to pilot the deletion of "clean" parcels of Superfund sites= and=20
    establishing guidance to ensure that all cleanup actions are consider= ed when=20
    listing sites on the Superfund National Priorities List -- which is e= xpected to=20
    keep some sites off the list, a factor that will help make them more = attractive=20
    for redevelopment.
Reforms that aim to reduce litigation and reduce both costs and = conflict=20
delays include efforts to increase fairness in the enforcement proces= s by=20
compensating settling parties for a portion of the "orphan shares," o= r cleanup=20
costs that are attributable to insolvent parties; and efforts to redu= ce=20
transaction costs by doubling the number of "small party" entities --= typically=20
small businesses and individuals whose contribution to pollution at S= uperfund=20
sites is small -- who are protected from lawsuits. To provide a posi= tive=20
incentive to reduce litigation, EPA also will reward cooperative part= ies at=20
sites that consistently perform high quality work by significantly re= ducing EPA=20
oversight.

A third set of reforms aims to provide more and better informati= on and=20
opportunities for involvement to citizens, state and local government= s, and=20
industry in cleanup decisions, to encourage responsible cleanup choic= es that=20
reflect local needs and preferences. Among these reforms will be eff= orts to=20
establish greater roles for states and tribes in remedy selection; pr= oviding=20
clearer information on remedy selection decisions through simple summ= ary sheets;=20
promoting pilot efforts to create consensus on cleanup options in com= munities;=20
and providing forums for stakeholder concerns by establishing an ombu= dsman in=20
each Region to help resolve stakeholder concerns and increasing use o= f tools=20
such as electronic bulletin boards to improve communications among st= akeholders.

As a followup to previously announced reforms, EPA also has issu= ed a new=20
policy that adopts as guidance the provisions of the lender liability= rule; and=20
issued model de minimis settlement agreements designed to further str= eamline the=20
de minimis settlement process.

R-178 =09 # # # =20

NEW COMMON-SENSE REFORMS MAKE SUPERFUND PROGRAM=20 FASTER, FAIRER AND MORE EFFICIENT

Continuing its commitment to make the Superfund program faster, faire= r and more efficient for the one in four Americans who live=20 near a toxic waste site, the Clinton Administration is announcing a p= ackage of 20 new, common-sense administrative reforms. These=20 reforms culminate the Clinton Administration's EPA's two-year effort = to fundamentally redirect the Superfund program under the=20 current law. These new reforms will help governments, communities an= d industry in three important ways:
    1. Make common-sense, cost-effective cleanup choices that protect pub= lic health and the environment. Lowering the costs of cleanup=20 makes both economic and environmental sense for communities, state an= d local governments, and businesses involved in cleanup=20 settlements. The new reforms will assure consistency; streamline proc= esses to save time and money; create new opportunities for=20 choosing cost-effective cleanup options; and do more to protect publi= c health and encourage economic redevelopment, including plans=20 to: =B7 Control Remedy Costs and Promote Cost-Effectiveness by establi= shing cost-effectiveness "rules of thumb" and establishing an=20 EPA National Remedy Review Board to ensure that costs are approp= riate to the cleanup needs; revisiting remedy decisions at=20 select sites where new and better science will achieve the same = level of protection, with potential cost savings; issuing=20 directives to ensure rigorous attention to costs in developing c= leanup options and selecting remedies; and promoting=20 consistent use of the most up-to-date policies and guidance to a= ssure cost effectiveness.

    =0C=00
    =B7 Ensure Risk Assessments are Grounded in Reality by soliciting = stakeholder input in designing accurate, consistent sitespecific assessments, including reasonable exposure pathways, an= d reaffirming EPA's commitment to allow parties at a site=20 to perform risk assessments under the proper circumstances.

    =B7 Conduct National Risk-Based Priority Setting by establishing f= ormal priority-setting systems for funding federal facility=20 and Superfund cleanups based on the principle of "worst sites fi= rst," and involving States and other stakeholders in=20 setting those priorities; and issuing guidance to promote risk-b= ased priority setting in determining federal facility=20 cleanup milestones.

    =B7 Reform Listing and Deletion Policies by piloting the deletion= of "clean" parcels of certain Superfund sites; and=20 establishing guidance to ensure that all cleanup actions that ha= ve been taken up to the time of a listing decision are=20 considered when listing sites on the Superfund National Prioriti= es List -- with the result that some sites will not warrant=20 listing, helping to make them more attractive for redevelopment.

    2) Reduce litigation through reforms so that more time is spent on cl= eanups and less on lawyers. In thousands of communities,=20 toxic waste cleanups have prompted litigation as some of those respon= sible for pollution at a site have sued or threatened to sue=20 many small businesses and individual citizens over even the smallest = possibility of involvement. In other cases, responsible=20 parties argue over "orphan shares" of responsibility -- cleanup oblig= ations of companies responsible for past pollution who are=20 insolvent. The new reforms will expedite cleanups by providing solut= ions to these and other common conflicts, including=20 commitments to:

    =B7 Increase Fairness in the Enforcement Process by compensating s= ettling parties for a portion of "orphan shares," the costs=20 that are attributable to insolvent parties; ensuring that settle= ment funds are dedicated to specific sites by placing them=20 in site-specific accounts; and, where settlement can't be reache= d, working with regions to ensure that cleanup orders are=20 issued to all appropriate parties (but not to parties whose cont= ribution to the pollution at the site is small -- de=20 minimis and de micromis parties) where there is a sufficient bas= is to direct them to conduct a cleanup.

    =B7 Reduce Transaction Costs by adopting private party cost alloca= tions, including those identifying an orphan share, as the=20 basis for a settlement after EPA review and approval; increasing= by thousands the number of parties who contribute very=20 small volumes of waste that will be protected -- at a minimum, d= oubling the level previously identified for small party=20 protection; and rewarding cooperative parties at sites that cons= istently perform high quality work by significantly=20 reducing EPA oversight.

    3) Help governments, communities, and industry become more informed= and involved so that cleanup decisions make the most sense at=20 the community level. EPA is committed to making Superfund work bette= r for the communities that rely on it to cleanup the toxic=20 waste sites threatening their public health and economic well-being. = A lack of good information about site conditions and cleanup=20 options has often led to cynicism and distrust of the Superfund progr= am. These reforms will harness the power of information to=20 take full advantage of the willingness of all involved at a site to a= rrive at responsible cleanup decisions.

    =B7 Establish Greater State/Tribal Role in Remedy Selection by imp= lementing a process allowing States and Tribes (at Tribal=20 sites) to select remedies at certain Superfund sites, consistent= with applicable law and regulations governing cleanups.

    =B7 Provide Clear Information on Remedy Selection Decisions throug= h a simple summary sheet explaining the cleanup plan and the=20 relationship between risk, cost, and other tradeoffs that were b= alanced in selecting a remedy from among the available=20 options.

    =B7 Promote Consensus in Choosing Cleanup Options by developing an= d initiating pilot projects in which EPA empowers and assists=20 citizens, PRPs, and other stakeholders in devising a mutually ac= ceptable, protective cleanup plan.

    =B7 Provide a Meaningful Forum for Stakeholder Concerns by establi= shing an Ombudsman in each Region to facilitate resolution of=20 stakeholder concerns at the Regional level; and using tools such= as electronic bulletin boards and grants to private and=20 educational institutions to improve communication among all Supe= rfund stakeholders.


Release date:10/02/95 Receive our News Releases Automatically by Email

 

 
Begin Site Footer

EPA Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us

URL:
Last Revised: 02/28/1997 11:49:15 AM