DOD Health Care:
Actions Needed to Help Ensure Full Compliance and Complete Documentation for Physician Credentialing and Privileging
GAO-12-31: Published: Dec 15, 2011. Publicly Released: Dec 15, 2011.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
Contact:
(202) 512-3000
williamsonr@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
DOD and the military servicesArmy, Navy, and Air Forceeach establish requirements for reviewing physician credentials and competence, but the military services requirements are in some cases inconsistent with DODs requirements and each others. For example, DOD requires disclosure and primary source verification of all state medical licenses a physician has ever held; Navy only requires these steps for licenses held during the previous 10 years. Inconsistencies also exist between DODs and the services requirements for the use of and primary source verification of certain clinical competence and practice history documents. Such differences may result in MTF noncompliance with requirements that DOD deems important. They may also create challenges for ensuring that all requirements are met for physicians from one military service who are working at an MTF managed by another service. Furthermore, DOD lacks a systematic process to address inconsistencies across requirements, to coordinate revisions to the requirements, and to achieve its goal of standardizing physician credentialing and privileging requirements across the MHS.
The five Army MTFs GAO examined did not fully comply with certain Army physician credentialing and privileging requirements. For 34 of the 150 credentials files GAO reviewed, the MTF had not documented proper verification of every state medical license the physician ever held at the time the MTF granted privileges; 7 of these 34 credentials files lacked this documentation for the physicians only current medical license. In addition, credentials files did not consistently contain documents required to support the physicians clinical competence, including peer recommendations and performance assessments; 14 files were missing required peer recommendations and 21 files were missing required performance assessments. Further, MTFs were not consistently documenting follow-up conducted on peer recommendations, as required. When required documents were present, they sometimes lacked required information. For example, performance assessments did not consistently contain data to support the assessment, even when an MTFs form specifically prompted for it. MTFs also lacked a systematic process for compiling and analyzing performance data. Finally, while MTFs usually complied with Armys requirement to search physicians malpractice history, files often lacked information needed to determine if the MTF had documented a complete practice history, as required.
Army oversight processes and requirements were insufficient to assure that its MTFs fully complied with requirements and documented complete information to support credentialing and privileging decisions. Army oversight of individual MTFs privileging decisions was insufficient to identify the instances of noncompliance and incomplete documentation that GAO observed during its review of credentials files at five selected Army MTFs. In particular, Army lacks a process for reviewing individual MTFs credentials files to identify these issues, as do Navy and Air Force. Moreover, weaknesses in Army requirements contributed to noncompliance and incomplete documentation. For example, MTFs did not consistently document follow-up on peer recommendations, in part because existing requirements do not clearly delineate responsibilities for documenting follow-up. Further, Army lacks requirements for documenting certain types of informationsuch as information on significant MTF deliberationsneeded to support credentialing and privileging decisions.
Why GAO Did This Study
The process of credentialing and privileging is central to ensuring that physicians who work in DOD military treatment facilities (MTF) have the appropriate credentials and clinical competence. After an Army physician allegedly shot and killed 13 people at Fort Hood in November 2009, GAO was asked to examine DODs physician credentialing and privileging requirements and whether MTFs are fully complying with those requirements. GAO examined the extent to which: (1) DOD ensures that physician credentialing and privileging requirements are consistent across the Military Health System (MHS), (2) Army MTFs are complying with Armys physician credentialing and privileging requirements, and (3) Armys existing oversight and physician credentialing and privileging requirements are sufficient to assure compliance and complete documentation. GAO reviewed DOD and service-level requirements and interviewed DOD and military service officials. Because Army has the largest staff of medical personnel, GAO reviewed a nongeneralizable sample of 150 physician credentials filesselected to include a variety of specialtiesand interviewed staff at five Army MTFs selected based on size and location.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To help ensure that the military services' requirements for physician credentialing and privileging are consistent across the MHS, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Surgeons General of the military services to establish a DOD-wide process to identify and address existing inconsistencies between DOD's and the military services' physician credentialing and privileging requirements, including those inconsistencies we identified in this report.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To help ensure that the military services' requirements for physician credentialing and privileging are consistent across the MHS, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Surgeons General of the military services to establish a DOD-wide process to coordinate all current and future efforts to revise physician credentialing and privileging requirements.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to coordinate individual MTFs' efforts to establish mechanisms to collect and analyze data to evaluate physician performance and support performance assessments.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to clarify requirements for how MTFs document follow-up on peer recommendations, including who is responsible for documenting follow-up and where that documentation should be filed.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to clarify requirements for the information that physicians need to provide in their curriculum vitae (CV) so that MTFs can identify unaccounted for periods in practice history, as well as how MTFs should document explanations of any unaccounted for periods.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to establish requirements for MTFs to document significant events that occur during the review of a credentials file, including which types of significant events should be documented, who is responsible for documenting significant events, and where that documentation should be filed.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to establish a process to ensure that relevant information from the DPDB is documented in the credentials file.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Open
Comments: As of September 2016, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
Recommendation: To assure that MTFs are fully complying with DOD's and the military services' requirements for physician credentialing and privileging and implementing these requirements appropriately, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Surgeons General of the military services to establish and implement an oversight process to conduct reviews of a sample of credentials files to identify and address areas of noncompliance and incomplete documentation.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »
Nov 1, 2016
-
Defense Intelligence:
Additional Steps Could Better Integrate Intelligence Input into DOD's Acquisition of Major Weapon SystemsGAO-17-10: Published: Nov 1, 2016. Publicly Released: Nov 1, 2016.
Oct 31, 2016
-
DOD Inventory of Contracted Services:
Timely Decisions and Further Actions Needed to Address Long-Standing IssuesGAO-17-17: Published: Oct 31, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 31, 2016. -
Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex:
DOD Partially Used Best Practices for Analyzing Alternatives and Should Do So Fully for Future Military Construction DecisionsGAO-16-853: Published: Sep 30, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 31, 2016.
Oct 26, 2016
-
Presidential Travel:
Estimated Costs for a Specific Presidential Trip to Illinois and FloridaGAO-17-24: Published: Oct 11, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 26, 2016. -
Joint Information Environment:
DOD Needs to Strengthen Governance and Management [Reissued on October 25, 2016]GAO-16-593: Published: Jul 14, 2016. Publicly Released: Jul 14, 2016.
Oct 24, 2016
-
Military Personnel:
Performance Measures Needed to Determine How Well DOD's Credentialing Program Helps Servicemembers [Reissued on October 21, 2016]GAO-17-133: Published: Oct 17, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 17, 2016.
Oct 20, 2016
-
Security Assistance:
Guidance Needed for Completing Required Impact Assessments Prior to Presidential DrawdownsGAO-17-26: Published: Oct 20, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 20, 2016.
Oct 17, 2016
-
Global Positioning System:
Observations on Quarterly Reports from the Air ForceGAO-17-162R: Published: Oct 17, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 17, 2016.
Oct 12, 2016
-
DOD Civilian and Contractor Workforces:
Additional Cost Savings Data and Efficiencies Plan Are NeededGAO-17-128: Published: Oct 12, 2016. Publicly Released: Oct 12, 2016.
Sep 26, 2016
-
Waste Management:
DOD Has Generally Addressed Legislative Requirements on the Use of Burn Pits but Needs to Fully Assess Health EffectsGAO-16-781: Published: Sep 26, 2016. Publicly Released: Sep 26, 2016.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here