United States Department of Agriculture
Research, Education and Economics
ARS * CSREES * ERS * NASS
Bulletin
Title: | Trial Policy for Assessment of Impact-of-Person-on-the- Job in ARS Category 4 Positions |
Number: | 01-401-ARS |
Date: | February 12, 2001 |
Originating Office: | Human Resources Division, AFM/ARS |
Distribution: | ARS Headquarters, Areas, and Locations (provide a copy to all Category 4 Scientists and their supervisors) |
Expires: | February 11, 2003 |
This
Bulletin establishes trial policy and procedures for reviewing the grade level of
incumbered ARS Category 4 positions.
As of 3/7/2002 this bulletin is being extended for another year to allow for additional cases to be completed under the trial policy and to collect more data to assess trends and patterns. The bulletin will be extended to February 11, 2003. Minor changes have been made to streamline the procedural process based on solicited feedback from Human Resources Division specialists using this trial policy. Changes are effective as of April 8, 2002. |
Table of Contents
1. Background
2. Review Basis
General
Submission Criteria
Exceptions
Classification Problems
Option if Dissatisfied
3. Evaluation Procedure Summary
4. Materials Required
5. Procedures
6. Summary of Responsibilities
Category 4 Scientists
Supervisors
Area Directors
Human Resources Division
7. Glossary
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 5
Exhibit 6
There has been longstanding interest in developing a uniform procedure for grading ARS
Category 4 (Service Scientist) positions. These positions sometimes offer the opportunity
for employees to impact the classification of their positions. During the Area Director
(AD) Workshop in September 1999, a request was made to design and test such a procedure.
This Bulletin establishes a one year trial procedure. Results will be evaluated at the end
of the trial period to determine whether the approach should be retained, modified or
terminated.
The intent of this procedure is to accommodate demonstration of person-in-the-job impact
on Category 4 positions, not to encourage or require this type of impact in all Category 4
positions.
The grade level of most Federal government positions, including those in ARS Category 4, is determined by criteria in U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) position classification standards. Most positions do not have unlimited promotion potential, but rather are limited by assignment characteristics and supervisory controls over the position. The maximum grade level of each individual position is determined using appropriate OPM standards, and is referred to as the full performance level (FPL).
Noncompetitive promotion is permitted when impact-of-person-on-the-job can be
demonstrated and documented. The intent of impact is evident in this excerpt from the Introduction
to the Position Classification Standards (OPM, July 1999):
The duties and responsibilities of a position may change over
time. For the most part these changes result from reorganizations, new or revised
organizational responsibilities or missions, and changes in technology. Sometimes,
however, the unique capabilities, experience, or knowledge a particular employee brings to
the job can also have an effect on the work performed and therefore on the classification
of the position.
While it is the position which is classified, the relationship
of the employee to the position can be recognized when the performance of the incumbent
broadens the nature or scope and effect of the work being performed. For example,
exceptional ability of the employee may lead to the attraction of especially difficult
work assignments, unusual freedom from supervision, special authority to speak for and
commit the agency, continuing contribution to organizational efficiency and economy,
recognition as an expert sought by peers, or similar considerations. Such
changes affect the difficulty of work or the responsibility and authority given the
employee and can be recognized in the position
classification decision. Job changes resulting from the individual
impact of an employee should be recorded to distinguish the position from descriptions of
other positions.
When significant changes in work occur for any of the kinds of
reasons mentioned above, the classification of the position (title, series, and grade)
should be reviewed and revised as needed.
When a position which has been affected by the impact of an
individual is vacated, it should normally revert to its original classification.
Additional guidance is provided in The Classifier's Handbook (OPM, July 1999):
The policy for classifying positions based on impact
of the person on the job is described in the Introduction to the Position
Classification Standards. This policy is based on the premise that the special
knowledge, skills, abilities, talents, or achievements of an individual may have an
important effect on the duties, responsibilities, and expectations of the job held.
The impact of the person on the job is reflected in the
classification when the performance of a particular individual actually makes the job
materially different from what it otherwise would be. On the other hand, the mere fact
that an individual in a position possesses higher qualifications or stands out from other
individuals in comparable positions is not sufficient reason by itself to classify the
position to a higher grade.
When determining grade level based on this concept, it is
essential that management recognizes and endorses the duties and that the work environment
allows continuing performance at a different level. The job description should clearly
state the higher level duties and responsibilities, The position's final classification
must be based on grade level criteria in appropriate standards and not merely on
comparison with other jobs. As with series determination, the employee's possession of
special qualifications would not affect the grade unless these qualifications are required
to perform the higher level duties.
When the classification of a position has been directly
affected by an individual employee, the position will normally require redescription and
reevaluation when it is vacated and typically will be filled at a lower grade level.
Submission Criteria
Procedures in this Bulletin apply only after a Category 4 scientist has been in grade at the FPL of their position for at least one year. If an assignment changes, the incumbent should perform the new assignment for at least one year prior to being reviewed. This Bulletin does not apply to career ladder promotions which occur prior to reaching the FPL.
Whenever the Area Director (AD) determines that a Category 4 scientist may have impacted their position beyond the established FPL, the AD may submit the position for review under procedures in this Bulletin.
Indicators of probable impact are:
Such features affect the difficulty of work or the responsibility and authority given
the employee. This concept can be recognized in the position classification decision when
it actually makes the position materially different than it otherwise would have been.
Note: Classification actions neither measure nor reward performance. An
employee's performance in a job has no direct relationship with the classification of the
job. Classification measures what an employee is assigned to do, not how well the employee
does it. Outstanding performance of assigned duties is therefore not a basis for
review under this Bulletin. Impact without a material change in the position itself is to
be recognized in the performance evaluation and ratings process and through the incentive
awards system.
Exceptions
No Category 4 position will be reviewed if the incumbent's performance rating of record is less than "Fully Successful" on a Critical Element or if management expects to assign such a rating before the scientist's case is reviewed.
No Category 4 position will be subject to review if the incumbent is affected, or will be affected, by budget impact, impending assignment change, or other organizational issues.
Application of the OPM General Schedule Supervisory Guide (GSSG) to determine the grade value of the supervisory component of a service position is the responsibility of the servicing Human Resources Specialist (HRS), and is performed separately from this procedure.
Classification Problems
If a review establishes problems with regard to either the grade level or categorization
of a position, the matter will be documented and referred to the AD for resolution.
Option if Dissatisfied
Category 4 employees may appeal the classification of their positions to either the USDA
Office of Human Resources Management (OHRM) or OPM as explained in P&P 431.1, Position
Classification and Position Management, or may request reconsideration by the REE
Classification Officer.
Under this procedure, grade levels of Category 4 positions will be determined by
application of OPM position classification standards.
Peer input will be obtained to help assess the impact of an incumbent's contributions to science, technology or programs, and a determination of the effect (if any) of such impact on the final grade level. When there is documented evidence of personal impact sufficient to warrant promotion, such promotion will be made noncompetitively.
The HRS retains position classification authority, including final grade level
determination. In determining the grade level, the HRS will consider input from the
position's immediate supervisor and from interviews of four Subject Matter Contacts (SMC)
selected by the HRS from a list submitted by the incumbent. The HRS may also interview
appropriate National Program Leaders (NPL), the incumbent, and other persons as determined
advantageous to fact finding. Names of persons interviewed by the HRS are subject to
confidentiality and will not be divulged. After the evaluation is completed, scientists
should not contact the subject matter experts regarding the evaluation process or their
input to the servicing HRS.
Grade levels based on an incumbent's personal impact are limited to the term of occupancy
of that incumbent, and do not establish a permanent FPL or career ladder. The position
will normally require redescription and reevaluation when it is vacated and typically will
be filled at a lower grade level.
Materials to be submitted for review are described in Exhibit 1.
Procedures for evaluating Category 4 positions are outlined in Exhibit 5.
AD. Area Director.
AD-332. (Available in InForms.) Position Description Cover Sheet.
Case Material. The position description and Supplemental Data Format (see definition
below) considered as a package.
Category 4 (Service Scientist). Permanent positions whose incumbents either primarily orexclusively serve as project or program leaders over or personally perform, work assigned to ARS involving professional scientific services to the public or to other governmental agencies, such as: identification of animals, plants, or insects; diagnosis of diseases; mass production of plants, animals, or insects; collection, introduction, and maintenance of germplasm or specimens; vaccine production; education, extension, or technology transfer activities; or nutrient data and food intake surveys. Category 4 positions are SY positions.
FPL. Full Performance Level.
Full Performance Level. The highest grade level of work described and classified
for a
particular position.
GM. General Schedule employees in the former Performance Management and
Recognition System.
GS. General Schedule.
GSSG. OPM General Schedule Supervisory Guide.
HRD. Human Resources Division, ARS.
HRS. Human Resources Specialist.
Impact of the Person on the Job. Sometimes the unique capabilities, experience, or knowledge a particular employee brings to the position can affect the work performed and therefore the classification of the position. The relationship of the employee to the position can be recognized when these aspects broaden the nature or scope and effect of the work being performed.
NPL. National Program Leader
OHRM. Office of Human Resources Management, USDA.
OPM. U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Position Description. The position description consists of the nine factors of the
Factor Evaluation System (FES). Supplemental Data (see definition below) are not part of
the position description.
Position Evaluation Report. A statement summarizing the most significant information
relevant to a position classification decision.
SF-52. (Available in InForms.) Request for Personnel Action.
SMC. Subject Matter Contact.
Subject Matter Contact. An individual knowledgeable of a Category 4 scientist's contributions, stature, recognition and impact, and listed on the Recommended Subject Matter Contacts List.
Supplemental Data. Factual information concerning a scientist's career which
reviewers must have in order to make fair and equitable grading decisions. See Exhibit
2.
/s/
JAMES H. BRADLEY
Director
Human Resources Division
1. Prepare position description in Factor Evaluation System
(FES) format as detailed in Policies and Procedures 431.1, Section 2.
2. Prepare Supplemental Data package as outlined in Supplemental
Data Format (Exhibit 2).
3. Complete Recommended Subject Matter Contacts List (Exhibit
3). Designate (by number) which contribution(s) each contact is knowledgeable about.
If the contact is a general (multi-contribution or career-long) contact, enter the word
"General" rather than contribution number(s). It is recommended that--where
possible--contact selection include at least some persons from ARS, USDA and other action
agencies, State agencies, user groups, academia, and others outside of ARS. Be sure to
include NPL(s) on the Subject Matter Contacts list.
4. Assemble AD-332, revised position description, Supplemental
Data package, and Recommended Subject Matter Contacts List. Top with a complete Case
Materials Certification (Exhibit 4). Forward with SF-52, Request for Personnel
Action (SF-52), through supervisory channels and the Area Office to the servicing HRS, in
accordance with Area/local procedures.
5. Address questions about package preparation and/or policy to
the servicing HRS.
Information on individual positions and incumbents will be submitted according to the
following outline. The standardized format is an important feature in assuring consistency
throughout ARS. Supplemental data will be reviewed for adherence to format. Inaccurate,
incomplete or improperly prepared packages will be returned for revision.
Outline
1. Most Significant Contributions
2. Stature, Recognition, and Impact
a. Honors and Awards
b. Special Invitations
c. Membership in Professional Societies
d. Offices and Committee Assignments Held
in Professional and Honorary Societies
3. Advisory and Consultant Activities
a. Participation in National Scientific
Meetings, Technical Conference, Workshops, etc.
b. Professional Advisory and Consulting
Activities
c. Special Assignments
4. Other Significant Information
5. Publications
General Guidance
In writing Supplemental Data, use gender-neutral terms and style instead of saying
"he," "she," "his," or "her." Begin sentences with
action verbs (the subject is understood). Write brief narrative paragraphs following the
outline shown above.
Cautions
Undue detail, verbosity, and needless repetition may weaken rather than strengthen your
package.
In completing your package, keep in mind the importance of recency.
Detailed Format Guidance
1. Most Significant Contributions. List up to five
of your most significant contributions having impact on science, technology or
programs. List and number in chronological order with the most recent listed first.
Purpose
The purpose of submitting Contributions Statements is to permit an
assessment of the impact of your original contributions to a field of science or
technology, and on ARS programs. Each submitted significant contribution must summarize
the following information in a brief, concise paragraph:
What was contributed? Emphasize what was done, but not how
it was done.
What was your role in the contribution? This is
particularly important for work involving a team effort. The position classification
procedure cannot take cognizance of group activities. It is important to describe as
accurately as possible what you as an individual contributed to the total contribution or
group effort.
Finally and most importantly, what is the impact on science or
the degree of adoption, or economic or program importance of the contribution? The
actual impact of a contribution sometimes changes with time--often it is not apparent for
some time after the work has been completed--therefore, great care and precision in
writing are required.
As a rule, each significant contribution statement should not
exceed one-half of a page in length.
Identify contributions since last promotion (or entry on duty with
ARS) via an asterisk.
Contribution Format Samples
As Germplasm Curator for the crop, coordinated the evaluation of
hundred germplasm accessions and consolidated the data into a report distributed to
scientists working with the crop. The report has stimulated increased use of the germplasm
to broaden the genetic base of the crop in the United States. (Exhibit 1a, letter from
State Agriculture Experiment Station scientists/Director documenting use of the report and
of the germplasmlines; Exhibit 1b, letter from plant breeder from Seed Company documenting
utility of the report and the new germplasm in their program; Exhibit 1c, copy of the
germplasm report).
Led a small team which.... (Exhibit 2a, letter from State program
official; Exhibit 2b, #14)
Organized, standardized and reevaluated all published information
on food consumption patterns in the rural Southwest during 1950-1990. Prepared a
comprehensive analytical report which formed the foundation of major policy and guideline
revisions by regional program administrators. (Exhibit 3a, #23; Exhibit 3b, #142)
Served as technical consultant to a series of major national
workshops and symposia evaluating scientific information on food nutrient composition.
This directly affected national policy in the area of _____________ by
______________________. (Exhibit 5a, memo from series coordinator; Exhibit 5b, memo from
Chairman of Mid-Atlantic Nutrition Advisory Board)
Developed a computer-based Indexing System (Exhibit 3) for insect
and mite systematics. It greatly increased the capability of Federal and State agencies to
conduct regulatory and economic entomology programs
Exhibits
For each contribution, select supporting documentation (exhibits).
A maximum of three exhibits may be used to document each contribution. (Copies
of exhibits are preferred over originals, since exhibits are discarded after the
position is evaluated.)
Exhibits must be selected with the following in mind:
. Exhibits must support statements of your
role and impact of the work on science, technology or programs.
. There is no requirement to "fill the
quota" with the maximum number of allowed exhibits. A total of eight to ten
carefully selected exhibits is often more effective in supporting a well- prepared
package.
. Full credit for a contribution cannot be
given when the contribution is documented solely by abstracts.
. Serial articles ("Part I, Part
II," etc.) are counted as separate documents when used as exhibits. Similarly,
supporting statements are counted individually, unless a statement is an enclosure to
another statement.
Acceptable exhibits include:
. Publications, i.e., technical reports,
germplasm releases, policy papers, review articles, peer-reviewed journal articles,
patents, etc.;
. Concise statements signed by some
knowledgeable authority such as NPS staff scientists, supervisors, action agency official,
industry or commodity group representative, AD's, etc.
. Videotapes, computer models, and other
commonly accessible media.
Note: Contributions may also be
documented by a mixture of types of exhibits, provided the maximum of three total
exhibits is not exceeded.
Exhibits must be referenced to the particular contribution
documented and--in the case of publications--to the publications list, e.g., Exhibit 1,
#3; Exhibit 3a, #6; Exhibit 3b, #8; Exhibit 4, #10; etc., and labeled accordingly.
Publications related to a contribution but of lesser importance than the exhibit(s) will
only be referenced to the publication list, e.g., #28, #34, and #40.
2. Stature, Recognition and Impact. Under subheadings shown
below, list up to 20 of your most significant awards, invitations and
advisory/consultant activities, in chronological order:
a. Honors and Awards: Give a
brief but sufficient description to enable the reader to determine true significance.
Differentiate between group and individual awards; do not include civic or social awards.
b. Special Invitations: These are to
be specific invitations to you to present a paper before science-oriented or
industry groups, prepare a paper or a chapter for a book, conduct a seminar, etc. These
are usually good evidence of professional recognition and standing. The key word is invitation.
Be selective since the stature of the group issuing the invitation is just as important as
the fact that an invitation was received. If an invitation was declined due to travel
restrictions or other reasons, state "Declined" in parentheses after the
listing.
For each entry, list the title, date,
location, and organization or purpose of gathering. If a paper was subsequently published,
reference it to the publication list.
c. Membership, Offices and Committee
Assignments Held in Professional and Honorary Societies: List
and give dates.
3. Advisory and Consultant Activities:
a. Participation in National
Scientific Meetings, Technical Conferences, Workshops, etc.: List, give date,
location, type of meeting, and title of talk or paper you gave. (Coauthored papers
or talks which were presented by others are not to be listed.) In some cases, it
may be difficult to determine if a paper should be listed here or as an invitational
paper. Make this decision and include the paper in one place but not both.
Reference papers to the publication list. If the same meeting, conference, etc., has been
attended a number of times, summarize information rather than listing individually.
b. Professional Advisory and Consulting
Activities: List each with dates, name and type of organization or situation
(generally outside ARS), and type and significance of contribution. These need not be on a
"paid" basis. Service as a journal reviewer is reported under this section. If
numerous, summarize information and list only most recent activities.
It may be appropriate to cite related
activities as further evidence of your impact and recognition.
c. Special Assignments: These should
be of a technical and professional nature. List each; give dates covered and briefly
describe. Include formal Technical Advisor appointment activities and contributions to
Special Foreign Currency Programs (Public Law 480). Only publications associated with the
assignment are to be referenced.
4. Other Significant Information:
Present narratively any information not covered in
paragraphs 1-3 considered important in evaluating you as a scientist. Examples include
educational and public relations efforts, and other activities which may be a part of the
your responsibilities.
Any exceptional or extenuating circumstances which may have
affected the quality or quantity of output, either favorably or unfavorably, should be
summarized here if such circumstances have not been covered under other items of the
format.
Materials in preparation or submitted but not yet accepted
are to be listed here, NOT in the publications list.
Often a scientist is required to perform duties vital to ARS
operations but which are not scientific or evaluable under classification standards. When
classifying a position having mixed duties, direct credit cannot be given for such
activities as some Location Coordinator duties, Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor,
Safety Officer, etc. A brief description of the intended role in meeting organization
goals and objectives, how well this role is fulfilled,
and how effective the individual is in cooperating with others
when this is necessary or desirable in the total program can be indicated.
5. Publications:
Start this section on a separate page. Attach the entire listing
at the end of the package. List only those items already published or accepted by the
publishing agent, citing acceptance date for the latter.
Publications to be listed are policy papers, technical reports,
patents, review articles, technical bulletins, books, book chapters, conference or society
proceedings, thesis/dissertation, popular publications, and others (identify specifically;
for example, transcript of radio talk). Do not include talks, radio or other presentations
unless they have actually been published.
List publications in chronological order, all authors in proper
order. Give full references including journal, volume and complete pagination.
Abstracts may be listed at your option. If shown, they will
be grouped separately in a separate section at the end of the publications list, and
numbered "A1, A2," etc.
Note: Materials in preparation or
submitted but not yet accepted are to be shown in paragraph 4, Other Significant
Information, NOT as part of this publications list.
PRIOR TO SUBMITTING YOUR CONTACT LIST, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SUBJECT MATTER CONTACTS TO
ALERT THEM THAT THEY MAY BE RECEIVING A PHONE CALL ON YOUR BEHALF.
Name of Scientist ________________________
Contact's Name, Official Capacity and Location | Telephone Number(s) | Knowledge of Contribution(s) Number: |
CASE MATERIALS CERTIFICATION
The enclosed case materials are accurate, complete and in the
prescribed format.
...............................................
Employee's Signature/Date
...............................................
Immediate Supervisor's Signature/Date
...............................................
Area Director's Signature/Date
Privacy Act Notification
General
This information is provided pursuant to the Privacy Act for individuals supplying
information for inclusion in a system of records. Section 5107, Title 5, United States
Code, authorizes agencies to place positions in the appropriate grade and series in
conformance with standards published by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
Providing information for evaluation is voluntary, but essential to the classification
process.
Purposes and Uses
Information in case materials is needed to provide evaluators with essential incumbent
facts to evaluate the position against classification criteria. This information may be
disclosed to appropriate officials/employees of the Agricultural Research Service (ARS),
USDA Office of Human Resources Management, and OPM, involved in the position
classification process. These data may also be used to aid decisions on placement of
Category 4 scientists within ARS.
Effects of Nondisclosure
Because the case materials contain information which is used to classify your position,
providing complete and specific information is in your best interest.
Step | Responsible Individual | Action |
1. Determine tentative grade level | Servicing HRS | . review
position description and Supplemental Data . select no less than 4 SMC's from Recommended SMC List and other necessary contacts . decide questions to ask/issues to clarify during interviews . tentatively grade position by reference to appropriate classification standard(s) Note: HRS is encouraged to interview the NPL(s) and at least one person not listed on the SMC List |
2. Conduct interviews | Servicing HRS | . focus on
resolving questions relevant to determining incumbent's impact, stature and recognition . if proximity of interviewees permits, a face-to- face interview may be preferable |
3. Final grade level determination | Servicing HRS | . make
final grade level determination . prepare and issue Position Evaluation Report through supervisory channels . destroy exhibits and interview notes . attach a copy of the Supplemental Data to file copy of the Position Evaluation Report . annotate AD-332: Classification limited to tenure of current incumbent. OR Redescription of duties - no change to classification. |
Supervisor | provide copy of Position Evaluation Report to incumbent |
Purpose: To provide additional
guidance for consistently implementing this Bulletin.
Evaluation Appendix A provides a format for documenting
grade level determination of
report nonsupervisory
Category 4 positions; the format for supervisory positions is in
formats: Appendix B.
Note
especially that:
. final
evaluation report structure will vary depending on whether the incumbent performs genetic
resources curator duties; and,
. when
the incumbent does perform such duties, grade level must be determined by reference or
cross-series comparison to criteria of a specific narrative or FES classification standard
or standards before Museum Curator GS-1015 criteria are applied.
Operating Questions regarding implementation of the Bulletin
which do not appear to be
guidance: adequately addressed in
the Bulletin should be referred to the REE Classification Officer.
Appeal Note that Category 4
employees who are dissatisfied with the classification
route: decision
resulting from this procedure may first obtain a classification review decision from the
REE Classification Officer before filing an appeal. For classification appeal policy and
procedures, see USDA PB 511-1 (3/8/99) and P&P 431.1, Section 7. Category 4 employees
are not covered by the exclusion for positions graded on the basis of peer panel
review.
Appendix A
Evaluation Report Format for
Nonsupervisory Positions
Position Evaluation Report
Position Number 4_____
I. Position Identification:
[current title, pay plan, series, grade],
USDA, ARS, _____ ________ Area, _______________________________ [unit name],
_______________ [duty station]
II. Classification References:
A. [series/guide
name](TS-__, _________ [mo/yr]
B. OPM Position
Classification Standard for the Museum Curator, GS-1015 Series (TS-38, February 1962) [cross-
series comparison for genetic resources curators only]
[NOTE: In many instances, only a
single standard/guide need be cited. In other instances, you will have to rely on
cross-series comparison for basic standards criteria.]
III. Background Information:
This is a professional service position
occupied by ___________ [name]. The service component of this position is evaluated under
the [series] standard(s). Bulletin 01-0401-ARS provides for a supplemental assessment of
the impact of a service scientist's contributions to science and technology, and a
determination of the effect (if any) of such impact on final grade level.
IV. Series and Title Determination:
The position performs.... This requires
application of professional education and training in the fields of ______________ and
________________, so that classification to the GS-_______ series is appropriate. The
title _______________ _____________ is prescribed by the standard. OR The
illustrative title ____________ __________ is constructed.
V. Grade Level Determination:
A. Standard(s)
Application
Applying criteria
of the GS-________ standard yields a grade of GS-____, because
____________________________. [for narrative standards]
OR
Factor Evaluation
System points assigned, as shown on the AD-332, total _____ points, whichconverts to GS-
____. [for FES standards]
[For curator
positions only]
The position was
also compared to criteria of the GS-1015 standard, and evaluated as follows:
Factor
I - Research Function:
Overall
evaluation at Level ____ (___ points) because ___________________.
Factor
II - Curatorial Function:
Overall
evaluation at Level _____(___ points) because ___________________.
Grade
Conversion:
Total
of ___ points converts to GS- _____. [Provide additional explanation if total points
assigned fall into the gap between grade level.]
[NOTE: Since this procedure is based on review of person-in-the-job impact, be sure the
evaluation clearly describes how the position duties and responsibilities are impacted by
the person and how the position has changed as a result of the impact.]
B. Final
Grade Level Determination: GS-_____
VI. Final Classification:
Based on the foregoing evaluation, this
position is properly classified as _____________, GS- ______-___.
[typed name]
Human Resources Specialist
[date]
Appendix B
Evaluation Report Format for
Supervisory Positions
Position Evaluation Report
Position Number 4_____
I. Position Identification:
[current title, pay plan, series, grade],
USDA, ARS, _____ ________ Area, _______________________________ [unit name],
_______________ [duty station]
II. Classification References:
A. [series/guide
name](TS-__, _________ [mo/yr]
B. OPM Position
Classification Standard for the Museum Curator, GS-1015 Series (TS-38, February 1962) [cross-
series comparison for genetic resources curators only]
C. OPM General
Schedule Supervisory Guide (GSSG) (TS-123, April 1993)
[Note: In many instances, only a
single standard/guide need be cited.]
III. Background Information:
This is a mixed position occupied by
_________ __. _______ [name]. The service component of this position is evaluated under
the series standard(s), and the supervisory component is evaluated under the GSSG.
Bulletin 01-0401-ARS provides for a
supplemental assessment of the impact of a service scientist's contributions to science
and technology, and a determination of the effect (if any) of such impact on final grade
level.
IV. Series and Title Determination:
The position performs.... This requires
application of professional education and training in the fields of ______________ and
________________, so that classification to the GS-_______ series is appropriate. The
title _______________ _____________ is prescribed by the standard. OR The
illustrative title ____________ __________ is constructed. Incumbent exercises technical
and administrative supervision of assigned scientific and support staff, so that addition
of the title "Supervisory" is appropriate.
V. Grade Level Determination:
A. Standard(s) Application
Applying criteria
of the GS-________ standard yields a grade of GS-____, because
____________________________. [for narrative standards]
OR
Factor Evaluation
System points assigned, as shown on the AD-332, total _____ points, which converts to GS-
____. [for FES standards]
[For curator
positions only]
The position was
also compared to criteria of the GS-1015 standard, and evaluated as follows:
Factor I -
Research Function:
Overall
evaluation at Level ____ (___ points) because ___________________.
Factor II -
Curatorial Function:
Overall
evaluation at Level _____(___ points) because ___________________.
Grade
Conversion:
Total of ___
points converts to GS- _____. [Provide additional explanation if total points assigned
fall into the gap between grade level.]
Grade Based on
Standard(s) Application:
[Note: Since this procedure is based on review of person-in-the-job impact, be sure the
evaluation clearly described how the position duties and responsibilities are impacted by
the person, and how the position has changed as a result of the impact.]
B. GSSG
Evaluation: Factor Evaluation System points assigned, as shown on the attached
Position Evaluation Summary for the General Schedule Supervisory Guide, total _____
points, which converts to GS- ____.
C. Final
Grade Level Determination: GS-_____
VI. Final Classification:
Based on the foregoing evaluation, this
position is properly classified as _____________,
GS-______-___.
[typed name]
Human Resources Specialist
[date]