bypass top and left hand navigationNational Science Board   HOME     PDF     SEARCH     HELP     COMMENTS     TEXT ONLY  
Science and Engineering Indicators 2004
  Table of Contents     Figures     Tables     Appendix Tables     Presentation Slides  
Chapter 4:
Highlights
Introduction
National R&D Trends

Federal R&D Performance and Funding

Technology Linkages: Contract R&D, Federal Technology Transfer, and R&D Collaboration
International R&D Trends and Comparisons
R&D Investments by Multinational Corporations
Conclusion
References
 
 
Click for Figure 4-34
Figure 4-34


Click for Figure 4-35
Figure 4-35

U.S. and International Research and Development: Funds and Technology Linkages

PDFPrint this chapter (438K)
R&D Investments by Multinational Corporations

Foreign-Owned R&D Spending in the United States
U.S. MNCs and Overseas R&D Spending
R&D Expenditure Balance

International R&D investments by multinational corporations (MNCs), such as overseas R&D spending and R&D joint ventures and alliances, support long-term activities aimed at the development of new products and technological capabilities. The resulting technological linkages across firms and geographic regions are increasingly vital in the fast-paced environment of scientific research and global market competition. International R&D spending links are particularly strong between U.S. and European pharmaceuticals, computers, and transportation equipment companies.[85] In recent years, the United States has attracted large investments by foreign R&D-performing companies. Foreign-owned R&D in the United States grew at a real average annual rate of 10.8 percent from 1994 to 2000, mostly as a result of mergers and acquisitions, compared with an average annual growth rate of 6.9 percent for U.S.-owned R&D overseas. This section analyzes data on foreign direct investment (FDI) in R&D (see sidebar, "Foreign Direct Investment in R&D"), including activity by foreign-owned companies in the United States, parent companies of U.S. MNCs, and U.S. overseas affiliates in terms of investing or host countries, their industrial focus, and implications for the ownership structure of U.S. R&D. Major findings were:

  • Foreign-owned firms conducting R&D in the United States accounted for $26.1 billion (13 percent) of the $199.5 billion in total industrial R&D expenditures in the United States in 2000. This share fluctuated between 11 and 13 percent during the period 1994–2000.

  • In 2000 about two-thirds of foreign-owned R&D in the United States was performed in three industries: chemicals and pharmaceuticals, computer and electronic products, and transportation equipment. Seven countries invested $1 billion or more in R&D in the United States in 2000: Germany, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, France, and the Netherlands, accounting for about 90 percent of all R&D expenditures by foreign-owned firms in the United States.
  • Parent companies of U.S. MNCs accounted for two-thirds of the R&D spending by all industrial R&D performers in the United States in 2000. In that year, these parent companies had R&D expenditures of $131.6 billion in the United States, whereas their majority-owned foreign affiliates (MOFAs) had R&D expenditures of $19.8 billion for a total of $151.3 billion in global R&D expenditures.

  • Two-thirds of the R&D performed overseas in 2000 by U.S.-owned companies ($13.2 billion of $19.8 billion) took place in six countries: the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, France, and Sweden. At the same time, emerging markets such as Singapore, Israel, Ireland, and China were increasingly attracting R&D activities by U.S. subsidiaries. In 2000, each of these emerging markets reached U.S.-owned R&D expenditures of $500 million or more, levels considerably higher than those in 1994.

  • Three manufacturing sectors dominated overseas R&D activity by U.S.-owned companies: transportation equipment, computer and electronic products, and chemicals and pharmaceuticals. These are the same three industries that accounted for most foreign-owned R&D in the United States, implying a high degree of R&D globalization in these industries.

Foreign-Owned R&D Spending in the United States top of page

Overview

The economic presence of foreign-owned companies in the United States is substantial. In 2000, majority-owned U.S. affiliates of foreign companies—affiliates operating in the United States in which the ownership stake of foreign direct investors is more than 50 percent—had a gross product (value added) of $449.4 billion, sales of $2.1 trillion, and almost 5.6 million employees in the United States, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)[86] (table 4-22 text table). These affiliates accounted for 6.0 percent of U.S. private-industry GDP and 4.9 percent of U.S. private employment in 2000 (Zeile 2002).

R&D spending by majority-owned U.S. affiliates of foreign companies (hereafter, foreign-owned R&D) reached $26.1 billion in 2000, an increase of 8.6 percent over 1999 expenditures.[87] In 2000, foreign-owned R&D spending accounted for 13 percent of the $199.5 billion in total industrial R&D expenditures in the United States, according to NSF's Survey of Industrial Research and Development.[88] This share fluctuated between 11 and 13 percent between 1994 and 2000. Note that the share of foreign-owned R&D spending in 2000 (13 percent) was more than twice the comparable share of U.S. private-industry gross product and employment, reflecting significant activity in R&D-intensive industries.

Investing Country and Industry Analysis

Relatively few investing countries account for most of the foreign-owned R&D in the United States. In 2000, European-owned subsidiaries accounted for $18.6 billion (71 percent) of foreign-owned R&D in the United States (figure 4-34 figure), a share comparable with their 67 percent share in foreign-owned gross product in the United States. The corresponding R&D shares for Canadian- and Asia/Pacific-owned subsidiaries were 14.0 and 10.9 percent, respectively. In particular, R&D activities by U.S. affiliates of foreign companies were dominated by seven investing countries with $1 billion or more in R&D expenditures (table 4-22 text table). These top countries accounted for about 90 percent of all foreign-owned R&D in the United States, a somewhat higher percentage than their corresponding shares of gross product (value added), sales, and employment (82, 73, and 80 percent, respectively). German- and British-owned subsidiaries accounted for about 20 percent each of the total foreign-owned R&D spending in the United States in 2000, followed by Canadian-owned affiliates with 14 percent. Relative to gross product, German-, Canadian-, and Swiss-owned companies, respectively, were the most R&D-intensive subsidiaries (table 4-22 text table).

Foreign-owned R&D in the United States is performed primarily in manufacturing. In 2000 about two-thirds was performed in three industries: 27 percent in chemicals (of which 80 percent was in pharmaceuticals), 24 percent in computer and electronic products (of which three-fourths was in communications equipment), and 12 percent in transportation equipment, mostly in motor vehicles. Electrical equipment and components and machinery accounted for 7 and 3 percent, respectively, of foreign-owned R&D in the United States (table 4-23 text table and appendix table 4-50 Microsoft Excel icon). The information sector and the professional, technical, and scientific services sector each represented 3 percent of this U.S. total in 2000, exhibiting little change from 1999.

Firms from some investing countries are particularly active in certain industries. In 2000, 80 percent of R&D performed by Swiss-owned subsidiaries in the United States was performed by chemical and pharmaceutical affiliates, compared with 38 and 24 percent, respectively, for British- and German-owned subsidiaries (table 4-23 text table). In contrast, more than a fourth of Japanese-owned R&D was performed by companies classified in computer and electronic products.[89]

The shares of computer and electronic products as well as transportation equipment in foreign-owned R&D spending are comparable with their shares in total company-funded industrial R&D spending in the United States, according to data from NSF's Survey of Industrial Research and Development.[90] However, the share of chemicals in foreign-owned R&D was more than twice the share of chemicals in overall industrial R&D in the United States (11 percent in 2000).[91] This difference suggests the appeal of the United States as a center for chemicals and pharmaceuticals R&D for major foreign companies, reflecting asset-seeking FDI goals. At the same time, the share of the gross product of these foreign-owned chemical affiliates in total foreign-owned gross product in overall chemical industry share in U.S. (private industry) GDP in 2000 (2.1 percent), indicating substantial production the United States (9.1 percent) was much higher than the activity by these affiliates (U.S. BEA 2003). These observations suggest that R&D investments by foreign chemical companies in the United States are likely pursuing both market- and asset-seeking objectives.

U.S. MNCs and Overseas R&D Spending top of page

Overview

The economic reach of U.S. MNCs—defined as U.S. parent companies and their foreign affiliates—is considerable.[92] According to BEA data, U.S. MNCs had a gross product of $2.70 trillion, sales of $9.03 trillion, and 31.20 million employees worldwide in 2000 (table 4-24 text table). Parent companies of U.S. MNCs (hereafter, U.S. MNC-parent companies) had R&D expenditures of $131.6 billion in 2000, whereas their MOFAs had R&D expenditures (hereafter, U.S.-owned overseas R&D) of $19.8 billion for a total of $151.3 billion in global R&D expenditures.[93]

Between 1994 and 2000, R&D spending by MOFAs grew at a faster rate (6.9 percent real average annual rate) than that of their U.S. parents (4.3 percent).[94] The percentage of total R&D spending by U.S. MNCs that was performed abroad by their MOFAs increased from 11.5 percent in 1994 to 13.1 percent in 2000. However, the 2000 R&D spending share of MOFAs within the worldwide operations of U.S. MNCs was approximately half of their share in employment and sales and a little more than half of their share in gross product (value added) (table 4-24 text table). This shows a relative preference by parents of U.S. MNCs for domestically based R&D performance compared with other activities, which is consistent with the behavior of MNCs based in other advanced economies (Niosi 1999). The high concentration of R&D expenditures by U.S. MNCs at home results in a significant role of these parent companies as R&D performers in the United States. U.S. MNC-parent companies accounted for two-thirds of the R&D spending by all industrial R&D performers in the United States in 2000.[95] In comparison, the gross product of U.S. MNC-parent companies accounted for about a fifth of U.S. (private industry) GDP in 2000, according to BEA.[96]

Host Country and Industry Analysis

Two-thirds of the R&D performed overseas in 2000 by MOFAs of U.S. companies ($13.2 billion of $19.8 billion) took place in six countries: the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, France, and Sweden (table 4-25 text table).[97] On a regional basis, the European region accounted for approximately two-thirds ($12.9 billion) of all U.S-owned overseas R&D; the Asia/Pacific region ($3.7 billion, or 18.9 percent) outpaced Canada ($1.9 billion, or 9.5 percent) as a locale for U.S.-owned overseas R&D (figure 4-34 figure).

In 2000, approximately three-fourths of U.S.-owned overseas R&D was performed in three manufacturing sectors: transportation equipment ($5.7 billion, or 29 percent), computer and electronic products ($4.9 billion, or 25 percent), and chemicals ($4.3 billion, or 22 percent, most of which, 83 percent, was in pharmaceuticals)[98] (table 4-25 text table). Compared with 1999, the share of computer and electronic products increased 3 basis points, mostly at the expense of chemicals, whereas the transportation equipment share was little changed. Information as well as professional, technical, and scientific services represented 2 and 6 percent, respectively, of overseas R&D in 2000, compared with 1 and 5 percent, respectively, in 1999. Certain emerging markets play an increasing role in U.S.-owned overseas R&D. The 10 locations shown in table 4-26 text table hosted $3.5 billion (18 percent) in R&D expenditures by MOFAs of U.S. parent companies in 2000, compared with $1.3 billion (11 percent) in 1994. Furthermore, U.S.-owned R&D expenditures in these 10 countries increased by 15.9 percent annually (real average annual growth) from 1994 to 2000, compared with 6.9 percent annual growth for the aggregate of all host countries. For some of these locations, the real average annual increases were much higher, albeit from smaller levels of R&D activity.

The change in the relative overseas R&D rankings of these emerging markets are significant, indicating a selective diffusion of global R&D activities beyond traditional areas, likely aimed at adapting products to local markets and regulations, complemented by local know-how and human R&D resources. For example, U.S. subsidiaries in Singapore, Israel, Ireland, Taiwan, and South Korea with activities in computer and electronic product manufacturing spent a total of $1.2 billion in R&D in 2000, or 25 percent of $4.9 billion of U.S.-owned overseas R&D in this industry. A third of the combined $555 million in R&D expenditures by U.S. subsidiaries in Mexico and Brazil was devoted to transportation equipment R&D.

R&D Expenditure Balance top of page

Foreign-owned R&D expenditures in the United States grew at a real average annual rate of 10.8 percent from 1994 to 2000, compared with an average annual growth rate of 6.9 percent for U.S.-owned overseas R&D. In 1998–2000 annual foreign-owned R&D spending in the United States exceeded U.S.-owned overseas R&D spending by at least $5 billion (figure 4-35 figure), or more than 3 percent of total industrial R&D in the United States. In 2000 the difference, or expenditure balance, was $6.3 billion, down from a record $7.7 billion in 1998. At the regional level, R&D expenditures by European-owned companies in the United States outpaced overseas R&D spending by U.S. subsidiaries in Europe by $5.7 billion in 2000 (figure 4-34 figure).

U.S.-owned companies in the United States and abroad, and foreign-owned affiliates in the United States, may have a combination of local and foreign sources of R&D funding. However, data on international funding sources for industrial R&D in the United States are generally unavailable. Both dimensions, ownership structure and funding sources, and how they may affect each other, are necessary for a fuller characterization of the international character of U.S. R&D activities. The Bureau of the Census, which conducts the NSF Survey of Industrial Research and Development, and BEA, which conducts the FDI surveys, are engaged in a data-linking project aimed at a more detailed profile of U.S R&D performance and funding.








Footnotes

[85]  Much like trends in international technology alliances discussed earlier in this chapter.

[86]  U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), Survey of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, 2000. Available at http://www.bea.gov/bea/di/di1fdiop.htm. BEA data used in this section exclude data for depository institutions. All data are on a fiscal year basis. Estimates for 2000 are preliminary. For the methodology of BEA's Survey of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, see http://www.bea.gov/bea/di/fddscrpt.htm.

[87]  R&D spending data in this section are based on R&D performance, which refers to R&D spending according to who conducts the R&D activity, whether for the performer itself or for others, regardless of funding source.

[88]  National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Industrial Research and Development, 2003. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/indus/start.htm.

[89]  Further industry-country analysis is precluded by disclosure limitations.

[90]  National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Industrial Research and Development, 2003. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/indus/start.htm.

[91]  National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Industrial Research and Development, 2003. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/indus/start.htm.

[92]  BEA defines parent company of a U.S. multinational corporation (MNC) as an entity (individual, branch, partnership, or corporation), resident in the United States, that owns or controls at least 10 percent of the voting securities, or equivalent, of a foreign business enterprise [R. J. Mataloni, Jr., U.S. multinational companies: Operations in 2000, Survey of Current Business (December 2002): 111–131]. This section is based on data for U.S. nonbank MNC-parent companies and their majority-owned nonbank foreign affiliates.

[93]  According to the NSF Survey of Industrial Research and Development, R&D abroad reached $17.9 billion in 2001, up 2.3 percent from $17.5 billion in 2000 (appendix tables 4-54 Microsoft Excel icon and 4-55 Microsoft Excel icon). Note, however, that the 2000 estimate for R&D abroad reported in the NSF survey differs from that reported in BEA's Survey of Direct Investment Abroad because of methodological differences in the surveys. For more information, see the NSF website at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/sird/start.htm and the BEA website at http://www.bea.gov/bea/di/usdscrpt.htm.

[94]  See appendix tables 4-51 Microsoft Excel icon, 4-52 Microsoft Excel icon, and 4-53 Microsoft Excel icon for historical data and selected industry detail for R&D performed by U.S. MNCs. In this section, data for R&D expenditures of U.S. MNC-parent companies include R&D performed for the Federal Government.

[95]  Note, however, that BEA's definition of U.S. MNC-parent companies does not rule out parent companies that are owned by foreign companies. About 13 percent of the published R&D expenditures for U.S. MNC-parent companies were also part of the R&D expenditures of majority-owned affiliates of foreign companies in the U.S. in 2000, and in 1999, according to BEA estimates.

[96]  Ned Howenstine, Chief, Research Branch, International Investment Division, U.S. BEA, personal communication with author, 8 April 2003. To match the industrial basis for foreign direct investment statistics, GDP data used in this comparison refer to U.S. private GDP excluding depository institutions and private households.

[97]  Data for U.S.-owned R&D in the United Kingdom are for 1999; most 2000 data were unavailable because of disclosure limitations.

[98]  Note that these are the same three industries that accounted for most foreign-owned R&D in the United States, implying a high degree of R&D internationalization in these industries.

Previous Page Top Of Page Next Page