Annual
Energy Outlook 2004 with Projections to 2025
Market Trends - Coal
Index (click to jump links)
Coal Production and Prices
Coal Mining Labor Productivity
Coal Consumption
Coal Production and Prices
Emissions Caps Lead to More Use of Low-Sulfur Coal
From Western Mines
Continued improvements in mine productivity (which
have averaged 5.9 percent per year since 1980) are projected to
cause falling real minemouth prices throughout the forecast relative
to historical levels. Higher electricity demand and lower prices,
in turn, are projected to yield increasing coal demand, but the
demand is subject to the overall sulfur emissions cap in the Clean
Air Act Amendments of 1990, which encourages progressively greater
reliance on the lowest sulfur coals (from Wyoming, Montana, Colorado,
and Utah).
The use of western coals can result in up to 85 percent
lower sulfur dioxide emissions than the use of many types of higher
sulfur eastern coals. As coal demand grows over the forecast, however,
new coal-fired generating capacity is required to use the best available
control technology (scrubbers or advanced coal technologies), which
can reduce sulfur emissions by 90 percent or more, providing market
opportunities for higher sulfur coal throughout the forecast.
From 2002 to 2025, production of high- and medium-sulfur
coal is projected to increase from 578 to 664 million tons (0.6
percent per year), and low-sulfur coal production is projected to
rise from 527 to 879 million tons (2.2 percent per year). As a result
of the competition between low-sulfur coal and post-combustion
sulfur removal, western coal production is expected to continue
to increase, but its projected annual growth rate falls from 8.4
percent, achieved between 1970 and 2002, to 2.2 percent in the forecast
period. Western coal production is projected to rise from 601 million
tons in 2002 to 706 million tons in 2010 and 996 million tons in
2025 (Figure 106).
Rate of Decline in Minemouth Coal Price Is Expected
To Slow
The average minemouth coal price, which fell by 3.6
percent per year (in constant dollars) from 1990 to 2002, is projected
to continue declining, from $17.90 in 2002 to $16.19 per ton in
2016 (2002 dollars), as mine productivity rises and lower cost production
in the West increases. Average minemouth prices trend upward after
2016, as productivity improvements slow and increasing coal demand
creates a need for new coal-mining capacity. In 2025, the average
minemouth price is projected to remain lower than the real price
in 2002 at $16.57 per ton (Figure 107).
The mines of the Northern Great Plains, with thick
seams and low overburden ratios, have had higher labor productivity
than other coalfields, and their advantage is expected to be maintained
throughout the forecast. Average U.S. coal mining labor productivity
(Figure 108) is projected to follow the trend for eastern mines
most closely, because eastern mining is more labor-intensive than
western mining.
Coal Mining Labor Productivity
Coal Mine Employment Is Expected To Remain Near
Current Levels
Gains in coal mine labor productivity result from
technology improvements, economies of scale, and better mine design.
At the national level, average labor productivity is also expected
to be influenced by changing regional production shares. Competition
from low-sulfur, low-cost western and imported coals is projected
to limit the growth of eastern low-sulfur coal mining. The boiler
performance of western low-sulfur coal has been tested successfully
by many electricity generators, and its use in eastern markets is
projected to increase.
Eastern coalfields contain extensive reserves of
higher sulfur coal in moderately thick seams suited to longwall
mining. Continued penetration of technologies for extracting and
hauling large volumes of coal in both surface and underground mining
suggests that further reductions in mining cost are likely. Improvements
in labor productivity have been, and are expected to remain, the
key to lower coal-mining costs.
As labor productivity improved from 1970 to 2002,
the average number of miners working daily fell by 2.0 percent per
year. Over the forecast period, substantial increases in coal production,
coupled with the expectation that productivity improvements will
be considerably less than during the past 20 years, result in a
stable outlook
for employment in the coal industry (Figure 109). The average number
of employees working at U.S. coal mines is projected to increase
from 75,000 in 2002 to 79,000 in 2025.
Lower Mining Cost Assumptions Lead to More
Coal Consumption
Alternative assumptions about future mining costs
affect projected coal prices and the choice of fuels for electricity
generation. In two alternative mining cost cases, minemouth prices,
delivered prices, and the resulting fuel consumption patterns in
the electricity sector vary with changes in projected mining costs.
Productivity is assumed to increase by 1.3 percent
per year through 2025 in the reference case, while wage rates and
equipment costs are constant in 2002 dollars. The national average
minemouth coal price is projected to decline by 0.3 percent per
year to $16.57 per ton in 2025 (Figure 110).
In the low mining cost case, productivity is assumed
to increase by 2.9 percent per year, and real wages and equipment
costs are assumed to decline by 0.5 percent per year [118].
As a result, the average minemouth price falls by 1.3 percent per year
to $13.27 per ton in 2025, 20 percent less than projected in the
reference case. Projected U.S. coal consumption is 44 million tons
(2.8 percent) higher in the low mining cost case than in the reference
case in 2025, primarily as a result of switching to coal from natural
gas in the electricity sector when gas prices rise later in the
forecast. The high mining cost case assumes that productivity declines
by 0.6 percent per year and real wages and equipment costs increase
by 0.5 percent per year. Consequently, the average minemouth price
of coal is projected to increase by 0.8 percent per year, to $21.45
per ton in 2025, 29 percent higher than in the reference case. Coal
consumption in 2025 is 142 million tons (9.1 percent) lower in the
high mining cost case than in the reference case, because less coal-fired
capacity is projected to be added.
Coal Consumption
Coal Consumption for Electricity Continues To Rise
in the Forecast
Domestic coal demand is projected to increase by 501 million
tons in the reference case forecast, from 1,066 million tons in
2002 to 1,567 million tons in 2025 (Figure 111), because of projected
growth in coal use for electricity generation. Total coal demand
in other end-use sectors is projected to remain relatively constant.
Coal consumption for electricity generation is projected
to increase from 976 million tons in 2002 to 1,477 million tons
in 2025 as the utilization of existing coal-fired generation capacity
increases and, in later
years, new
capacity is added. The average utilization rate for coal-fired power
plants is projected to increase from 70 percent in 2002 to 83 percent
in 2025. Because coal consumption (in tons) per kilowatthour generated
is higher for subbituminous coal and lignite than for bituminous
coal, the expected shift to western coal is projected to increase
the tonnage consumed per kilowatthour of generation, particularly
in the Midwest and Southeast regions.
Low-Sulfur Coal Continues To Gain Share in the
Generation Market
Phase 1 of CAAA90 required 261 coal-fired generating
units to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions to about 2.5 pounds per
million Btu of fuel. Phase 2, which took effect on January 1, 2000,
tightened the annual emissions limits imposed on large, higher emitting
plants and also set restrictions on smaller, cleaner plants fired
with coal, oil, and gas [119].
During Phase 1, many generators switched either partially
or entirely from higher sulfur bituminous to low-sulfur subbituminous
coal, incurring relatively modest capital investments. Such fuel
switching often generated sulfur dioxide allowances beyond those
needed for Phase 1 compliance, and the excess allowances generated
during Phase 1 were banked for use in Phase 2 or sold to other generators.
In the forecast, fuel switching for regulatory compliance and for
cost savings is projected to reduce the composite sulfur content
of all coal produced (Figure 112). The main sources of low-sulfur
coal are the Central Appalachian, Powder River Basin, and Rocky
Mountain regions and coal imported from Colombia, Venezuela, and
Indonesia.
Coal users could face additional costs in the future
if additional or new restrictions on emissions are adopted.
An example of a proposal to further reduce emissions from U.S. power
plants is the Bush Administrations Clear Skies Initiative.
Relative to current law and regulations, the Administrations
proposal specifies further restrictions on emissions of nitrogen
oxides and sulfur dioxide and would introduce a national cap on
mercury emissions.
Industrial Steam Coal Use Rises, But Demand for
Coking Coal Declines
For applications other than electricity generation,
a projected increase of 4 million tons in industrial steam coal
consumption between 2002 and 2025 (0.3-percent annual growth) is
expected to be more than offset by a decrease of 5 million tons
in coking coal consumption (Figure 113). Increasing consumption
of industrial steam coal is projected to result primarily from greater
use of existing coal-fired boilers in energy-intensive industries.
The projected decline in domestic consumption of coking
coal results from the expected displacement of raw steel production
from integrated steel mills (which use coal coke for energy and
as a material input) by increased production from minimills (which
use electric arc furnaces that require no coal coke) and by increased
imports of semi-finished steels. The amount of coke required per
ton of pig iron produced is also declining, as process efficiency
improves and injection of pulverized steam coal is used increasingly
in blast furnaces. Domestic consumption of coking coal is projected
to fall by 1.2 percent per year from 2002 to 2025.
Although total energy consumption in the combined
residential and commercial sectors is projected to grow by 1.3 percent
per year, most of the growth is expected to be captured by electricity
and natural gas. Coal consumption in the residential and commercial
sectors is projected to remain constant, accounting for less than
1 percent of total U.S. coal demand in the forecast.
Declining U.S. Coal Exports, Rising Imports
Are Projected
U.S. coal exports declined sharply from 1998 to 2002,
from 78 million tons to 40 million tons, and are projected to continue
declining in the reference case to 23 million tons in 2025 (Figure
114). Recent declines in U.S. coal exports occurred against the
backdrop of a world coal market that saw an increase in trade from
546 million tons in 1998 to 656 million tons in 2002. While low-cost
supplies from China, Indonesia, Russia, and Australia satisfied
much of the growth in international steam coal demand, low-cost
supplies of coking coal from Australia supplanted substantial amounts
of U.S. coking coal in the world market.
The U.S. share of total world coal trade is projected
to fall from 6 percent in 2002 to less than 3 percent in 2025, as
international competition intensifies and coal imports to Europe
and the Americas grow more slowly or decline. From 2002 to 2025,
U.S. steam coal exports are projected to drop from 19 million tons
to 10 million tons, despite substantial projected growth in world
steam coal trade. U.S. coking coal exports are also projected to
decline, from 21 million tons in 2002 to 13 million tons in 2025,
while a small increase in the world trade in coking coal is expected.
U.S. imports of low-sulfur coal are projected to
grow from 17 million tons in 2002 to 46 million tons in 2025. For
many coastal power plants, imports will be the least costly option
for meeting emissions targets. The addition and expansion of existing
coal import facilities in the United States, along with a reduction
in demand for coal in Europe, are likely to contribute to projected
increases in coal imports. Much of the low-sulfur coal projected
to be imported is expected to come from Colombia, Venezuela, and
Indonesia.
Notes and Sources
Released: January 2004
|